The Villa at Rose City

517 West Page Street, Rose City, MI 48654 (989) 685-2442
For profit - Corporation 102 Beds VILLA HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
40/100
#180 of 422 in MI
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Villa at Rose City has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality, with some significant concerns. It ranks #180 out of 422 facilities in Michigan, placing it in the top half of all nursing homes in the state, and it is the top choice out of two in Ogemaw County. The facility is showing an improving trend, reducing issues from 18 in 2024 to just 5 in 2025, which is encouraging. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5 rating and a low turnover rate of 18%, significantly better than the state average. However, the home has incurred $63,934 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 78% of Michigan facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents reported include failures in supervision that led to multiple unwitnessed falls resulting in serious injuries for residents, including fractures. Additionally, there was a troubling incident where a resident fell while being removed from a van due to improper staff training, leading to significant injuries. The facility also struggled with pressure ulcer management, resulting in residents developing serious skin injuries and experiencing unnecessary pain. While there are strengths in staffing and overall quality measures, these serious incidents highlight areas for improvement that families should consider.

Trust Score
D
40/100
In Michigan
#180/422
Top 42%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
18 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
18% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 30 points below Michigan's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
$63,934 in fines. Lower than most Michigan facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Michigan. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 18 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (18%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (18%)

    30 points below Michigan average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Federal Fines: $63,934

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: VILLA HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record

5 actual harm
Mar 2025 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for management and care of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter per standards of practice for one resident (Resident #124) of one resident reviewed. Findings include: On 3/4/25 at 12:30 PM, Resident # 124 was observed in their room in bed. The Resident had a neck immobilizer brace in place. An IV pump and pole were positioned on the right side of the Resident. A 250 milliliter (mL) bag of 0.9% normal saline solution containing 1.75 grams (g) of Vancomycin (antibiotic) with approximately 40 mL of solution remaining in the bag was hung on the pole and fed into the IV pump but not connected to the Resident. When queried, Resident #124 revealed they had spinal fusion surgery which was why they had to wear the neck brace. When queried regarding the IV antibiotic, Resident #124 revealed had an infection. When queried regarding IV access, Resident #124 revealed they had a PICC line and moved their shirt sleeve to show a PowerPICC line in their right upper arm. The transparent Tegaderm dressing covering the PICC line insertion site was undated, lose and peeling. Resident #124 was asked when the dressing had been changed last and indicated they were not sure of the date. Record review revealed Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cervical spinal fusion, osteomyelitis of the cervicothoracic vertebrae (infection of the spine), and antibiotic use. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident required none to moderate assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The MDS further detailed the Resident had intravenous (IV) access. Review of Resident #124's Health Care Provider (HCP) orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: - Sodium Chloride Flush Intravenous Solution 0.9 % (Sodium Chloride Flush) Use 10 milliliters four times a day for before and after antibiotic administration . (Start Date: 2/25/25) - Heparin Lock Flush Solution 10 units/mL Use 5 mL intravenously two times a day for per protocol . Use 5 mL as final flush in non-valved lines . (Start Date: 2/25/25) - IV PICC line change dressing every 7 days . every Wednesday . per protocol (Start Date: 2/26/25) Per the MAR, the PICC line dressing was changed on 2/26/25. Review of Resident #124's hospital Patient Summary Discharge Instructions, Orders and Medications dated 2/24/25 revealed, Complete Medication List . list of medications for you to use at home. Take only the medications listed below . New Medications . Sodium chloride (sodium chloride 0.9% injectable solution) 10 milliliters (mL) IV flush every 8 hours . Vancomycin 1.75 g (IV) solution every 12 hours . How to care for your PICC . Flush the PICC as told . Keep the PIICC dressing dry and secure it with tape if the edges stop sticking to your skin . Preventing Other Problems. Do Not use a syringe that is less than 10 mL to flush the PICC . How to care for your PICC dressing: Keep your PICC dressing clean and dry . Your PICC dressing needs to be changed if it becomes loose or wet . On 3/5/25 at 8:45 AM, Resident #124 was observed in their room. The Resident was receiving vancomycin IV infusion via the PICC line in their right upper extremity and the dressing over the PICC line insertion site was undated, loose, and peeling. On 3/6/25 at 7:09 AM, Resident #124 was observed in their room. The Resident was receiving vancomycin IV infusion via the PICC line in their right upper extremity. An interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/6/25 at 8:07 AM. When queried if the transparent dressing over PICC line insertion site should be loose and peeling, the DON stated, No. When asked if the dressing should be dated, the DON replied, I don't know if the policy stated that. The DON was informed of observations of Resident #124's PICC line dressing at this time but did not provide further explanation. When queried why the facility was flushing Resident #124's PowerPICC line with heparin, the DON indicated that was the protocol and HCP order. The DON was then asked if flushing a PICC line with heparin is evidence based best practice and stated it is. When queried why Resident #124's hospital discharge documentation specified the PICC line should be flushed with 10 mL normal saline and not heparin, the DON did not provide further explanation. On 3/6/25 at 9:57 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B. When queried if they were going to flush Resident #124's PICC line, LPN B stated, Already did it. LPN B was then asked what they used to flush the Resident's PICC line and opened the medication cart. LPN B presented a prefilled 10 mL syringe of normal saline and a prefilled 5 mL syringe of Heparin 10 units/mL. LPN B was asked to describe the process in which they flush the PICC line and stated, Heparin is second. When asked to clarify if they were saying they flushed the PICC with the normal saline flush followed by the 5 mL syringe of heparin, LPN B verified. When asked if a 5 mL flush syringe is appropriate to use with a PICC line, LPN B indicated that was what the facility pharmacy had sent. Upon request for a facility policy/procedure pertaining to PICC line care and maintenance, the facility provided a pharmacy procedure entitled, 005-J: Flushing Midline and Central Line IV Catheters (May 2022;) . Flushing . 1. Flush open ended (non-valved) catheters with normal saline and heparin . 2. Flush closed ended (valved) catheters with normal saline . Technique: 1. Always use a syringe barrel size of 10 mL or greater when flushing . Flushing when giving medication with SASH (saline, administer medications, saline, heparin) method . 16. Connect 10 mL syringe containing heparin . A study conducted by [NAME], [NAME], Atem, Nair, Warkola, and [NAME] (2025) showed consistent results with previous research studies and literature reviews to recommend discontinuation of heparin use and implementation of normal saline only as a flush and locking agent in routine PICC line care. Reference: [NAME], L., [NAME], M., Atem, F., Nair, K., Warkola, R, & [NAME], M. (2025). Heparin Versus Saline: A Comparative Study to Support Practice Change Within an Organization. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 48, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/[NAME].0000000000000569
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow two physicians' orders to discontinue a medication for one resident (Resident #11) of five residents' records reviewed for unneces...

Read full inspector narrative →
. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow two physicians' orders to discontinue a medication for one resident (Resident #11) of five residents' records reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #11 (R11): On 3/05/25 at 2:27 PM, the medication orders for R11 were reviewed. An active and current order for Melatonin Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for insomnia at bedtime was observed. A review of the Behavioral Health Solutions (BCS) recommendations for the date of service 12/29/2024 included, Based on the data obtained and discussions with patient and staff, this provider concludes: a change in medication will be recommended at this time-dc PRN (discontinue as needed) Melatonin as not used in December. The summary of this report further stated, Plan: Patient with no c/o (complaints of) insomnia. No PRN Melatonin use is noted in December. Recommend dc of Melatonin at this time. Recommend staff continue to monitor sleep. Document episodes of insomnia. The recommendation had been highlighted, and the physician had signed near the highlighted recommendation. During an interview on 3/05/25 at 4:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Social Services (Staff F) reviewed the recommendations made by BCS on 12/29/24 and acknowledged the physician had signed and agreed with the recommendations. The medication administration records for 12/2024, 01/2025 and 02/2025 revealed the Melatonin ordered as needed had not been discontinued. Further review of the medical record for R11 revealed an additional consultation by BCS for the date of service 2/25/2025 included, . Plan Patient with no c/o insomnia. Recent scheduling of Melatonin noted per PCP (Primary Care Physician) 2/2/2025; no PRN Melatonin use has been noted. Recommend dc of PRN Melatonin at this time. Recommend staff continue to monitor sleep. Document episodes of insomnia. The recommendation had been highlighted, and the physician had signed near the highlighted recommendation and made a check mark on the highlighted recommendation. During an interview on 3/05/25 at 4:07 PM, the DON and Staff F reviewed the recommendations made by BCS on 2/25/25 and acknowledged the physician had signed and had agreed with the recommendations. The medication administration records for 02/2025 and 03/2025 revealed the Melatonin ordered as needed had not been discontinued. During an interview on 3/06/25 at 4:00 PM, the DON and Staff F upon reviewing BCS recommendations and physician follow up agreed the Melatonin as needed order had been approved by the physician to be discontinued but remained an active order until 3/5/25. The facility presented an undated policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders. This policy read in part, Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#121) of five residents reviewed for unne...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#121) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications had appropriate indications for use. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, malnutrition, and weakness. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required set-up to partial assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The MDS further detailed the Resident expressed symptoms of depression during the Resident Mood Interview but displayed no behaviors. Review of Resident #121's Health Care Provider (HCP) orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the Resident was receiving Trazadone (antidepressant medication) 50 mg every evening for sleep. Resident #121 did not have a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, and/or insomnia. Review of Resident #121's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, I uses antidepressant medication r/t (related to) Poor prognosis (Initiated: 2/28/25). The care plan included the intervention, Administer antidepressant medications as ordered by physician . (Initiated: 2/28/25) Review of documentation in Resident #121's EMR revealed the following: - 2/25/25 at 5:29 PM: Nursing Evaluation . Sleep: Does not have sleep issues . - 2/26/25 at 7:58 PM: Physician/PA/NP - Progress Note (Narrative) . admission visit for weakness following hospitalization for altered mental status, dementia, failure to thrive . Staff related no concerns at this time . Psych: No increased stress, anxiety, depression or memory changes . General: Appears comfortable, alert, no anxiety noted, no acute distress . An interview was completed with Social Services Director F on 3/6/25 at 11:05 AM. When queried regarding Resident #121's Trazadone, Director F reviewed the Resident's HCP orders in the EMR and stated, The order is for sleep. When asked if sleep was an appropriate indication for use for an antidepressant medication for a Resident who does not have a diagnosis of depression or insomnia, Director F verbalized understanding but did not provide further explanation. On 3/6/25 at 11:31 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When queried regarding Resident #121's Trazadone order indication for use of sleep, the DON replied, The doctor uses it off label. The DON was asked if the Resident had a diagnosis of sleep and stated, No. When asked if the Resident had a diagnosis of insomnia or depression, the DON stated, No. The DON was then queried regarding the lack of appropriate indications for use of the psychotropic medication and stated they would speak to the doctor to have them add a diagnosis. No further explanation was provided. A policy/procedure related to psychotropic medication use was requested at this time but not received by the conclusion of the survey.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and medical supplies were secu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and medical supplies were secured, stored and disposed of per professional standards of practice in one of two medication storage rooms, one of two medication carts, and one treatment cart. Findings include: A tour of the C and D hall medication cart was completed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B on [DATE] at 7:29 AM. A container of undated glucometer testing strips were observed in the top drawer of the medication cart. When queried if the strips should be dated when opened, LPN B verbalized they should and indicated the glucometer controls were completed by night shift staff. On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, the treatment cart positioned near the C hall entrance was observed to be unlocked and unattended by staff. No staff were present at the nurses' station. At 9:33 AM on [DATE], Registered Nurse (RN) H approached the nearby medication cart but did not address the unlocked treatment cart. RN H was then queried regarding the treatment cart and confirmed it was unlocked. A tour of the treatment cart was completed with RN H at this time. The treatment cart contained both prescription and OTC treatment medications. The following open and expired items were present in the cart: - Open and undated package of calium alginate wound dressing - Open and undated package of Xeroform petroleum wound dressing - Open and undated package of Xeroform impregnated with 3% Bismuth Tribromophenate and petroleum The above wound care dressings were partially used and/or cut. When queried if wound care dressing packages are supposed to be opened, undated, partially used and in the cart, RN H stated, Ugh, gross. No. The following expired items were present in the treatment cart: - Nine Hydralock SA 6 X 10 inch wound dressings; Expired: [DATE] - 74 Adhesive Tape Remover Pads; Expired: [DATE] - Prescription Mycostatin (antifungal) cream container; Quantity 120 for Resident #50; the pharmacy label specified, Discard [DATE]. - Prescription Mycostatin (antifungal) cream container; Quantity 120 for Resident #15; Expired [DATE] RN H was asked if Resident #15 was receiving the prescription cream and stated, (Resident #15) has been getting. When queried the last time the topical medication treatment was administered to Resident #15, RN H replied, Today. With further inquiry, RN H confirmed the expired cream was utilized. A tour of the [NAME] End Medication Room was completed on [DATE] at 12:05 PM. There were multiple items observed under the sink including emergency lights and cords, medication disposal solution jug, and another jug labeled, Save Coffee Grounds Please in sharpie. The following expired items were present in the medication room: - Multiple home medications for various residents - Five green top laboratory blood tubes; Expired: [DATE] - Three blue top laboratory blood tubes; Expired: [DATE] - Six blue top laboratory blood tubes; Expired: [DATE] - One 1 milliliter (mL) [NAME] point tuberculosis (TB) syringe; Expired: 9/23 - 0.5 mL [NAME] point insulin syringe; Expired: 6/24 The medication refrigerator in the medication room contained multiple vaccines including influenza and pneumococcal. Refrigerator temperature monitoring was completed one time per day. An interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 12:41 PM. When queried if supplies should be stored under the sink in the medication room, the DON stated, There shouldn't be anything under the sink. The DON was then queried regarding multiple resident's expired home medications and expired supplies in the medication room and verbalized that expired supplies should be disposed of. When asked how often a medication refrigerator, containing vaccines, temperature should be checked, the DON stated, Once a day. When queried regarding CDC (Center for Disease Control) recommendations related to temperature monitoring of refrigerated vaccines, the DON reviewed the facility policy/procedure and stated, Twice a day. Review of facility policy/procedure entitled, Medication Storage in the Facility (Dated [DATE]) revealed, Medications and biologicals are stored safety, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations . Procedures . B . Medications rooms, carts and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access . H. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications . are immediately removed . disposed . Temperature . F. The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccines are stored, at least two times a day, per CDC guidelines . Expiration Dating . C. Certain medications or package types such as . blood sugar testing solutions and strips, once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the sanitizer for the wiping cloths, used to sanitize food preparation areas, was at the correct concentration ...

Read full inspector narrative →
. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the sanitizer for the wiping cloths, used to sanitize food preparation areas, was at the correct concentration for disinfection. Findings include: During a tour of the dietary department on 3/4/25 at 9:42 AM with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) A, the red sanitizer bucket was observed with a wiping cloth immersed in solution ready to use. The wiping cloths were used to sanitized dietary counters and food preparation areas. CDM A tested the solution to determine the amount of sanitizer present. The quaternary ammonium sanitizing chemical measured 50 - 100 ppm (parts per million). CDM A stated the proper sanitizer level was 200-400 ppm. During a tour of the dietary department on 3/5/25 at approximately 1:30 PM with CDM A, the red sanitizer bucket was observed with a wiping cloth immersed in solution ready to use. The sanitizer bucket was again tested by CDM A. It did not register any quaternary ammonium sanitizer present as the test strip did not change color. CDM A tried a new test strip dispenser, but it again registered zero ppm. CDM A stated it was the change of shift, and the sanitizer bucket should be emptied, but with the wiping cloth immersed, it appeared ready for use. The CDM stated there was not a written procedure for the sanitizing process. On 3/5/25 at 2:02 PM, CDM A provided a newly formulated undated guide titled Sanitizer Sink Procedure. It read in part, .Compare strip to color chart, Must be between 200-400ppm. During a tour of the dietary department on 3/6/25 at 11:00 AM, CDM tested the sanitizer bucket. The quaternary ammonium sanitizing chemical measured zero indicating there was no disinfectant present in the solution to sanitize and yet contained a wiping cloth immersed ready for use. The FDA Food Code 2017 States: - 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths . (B) Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other EQUIPMENT surfaces shall be: (1) Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under § 4-501.114; - 4-501.114 Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Chemical Sanitization -Temperature, pH, Concentration, and Hardness. A chemical SANITIZER used in a SANITIZING solution for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times specified under 4-703.11(C) shall meet the criteria specified under §7-204.11 Sanitizers, Criteria, shall be used in accordance with the EPA-registered label use instructions, P and shall be used as follows: .C) A quaternary ammonium compound solution shall: (1) Have a minimum temperature of 24oC (75oF), P (2) Have a concentration as specified under § 7-204.11 and as indicated by the manufacturer's use directions included in the labeling, P and (3) Be used only in water with 500 MG/L hardness or less or in water having a hardness no greater than specified by the EPA-registered label use instructions; - 4-702.11 Before Use After Cleaning. UTENSILS and FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be SANITIZED before use after cleaning. .
Oct 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147582. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147582. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision, follow and implementtimely interventions for three residents (Resident #1,Resident #2 and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in repeated unwitnessed falls, an eyebrow laceration, right hip and left hip fractures with the likelihood of further falls and/or injuries. Findings include: Resident #1: On 10/23/2024, at 10:00 AM, Resident #1 was resting in a reclined geri-chair in the therapy room with the speech therapist. On 10/23/24, at 10:10 AM, a record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intellectual disability, repeated falls and Dementia. Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. A review of the Fall Risk Evaluation admission 9/6/2024 revealed total score is 16 Total score of 5 or above is HIGH RISK. A review of the Physical Therapy PT Evaluation & Plan of Treatment Start of Care: 9/8/2024 revealed . Ambulation Walk 10 feet = Supervision or touching assistance . A review of the Fall - Unwitnessed . 09/13/2024 11:00 . This nurse called to nursing station, observed staff hoyering res into w/c. Res had fallen and obtained laceration to left brow. Res was assessed by DON, no further injuries noted. Resident unable to give description . Res assessed and received laceration to left brow, area cleansed, Res sent to ER for eval for need of stitches. Confused Gait Imbalance Impaired Memory Balance Problem were all check marked. A review of the corresponding IDT progress note revealed IDT met to discuss resident fall. Root cause determined to be poor safety awareness d/t dementia diagnosis, has history of falls. Intervention for resident to be supervised with ambulation. Care plan reviewed and updated. A review of the Fall - Unwitnessed . 10/9/2024 1350 (1:50 PM) . CNA went to get resident up to take to lunch and when she went in room resident was sitting in wheelchair and said that she fell. Resident had no c/p at this time Resident stated she fell . After lunch RN attempted to get resident out of wheelchair. Resident was able to stand but unable to walk, right leg would give out. (physician) notified and Xray ordered . Injury location Right trochanter (hip) . Confused Gait Imbalance Weakness/Fainted Balance Problem were all check marked. A review of the progress notes revealed: 9/23/2024 . Sutures removed from left eyebrow . 10/7/2024 12:30 . Resident has been becoming increasingly restless. She is pacing and wandering into others rooms . 10/9/2024 14:14 Resident stated she fell in room prior to lunch. No injuries noted or c/o of pain at that time. After lunch resident returned to unit and was unable to walk. Resident could stand but when attempt to walk right leg would give out. Resident would grab right leg as if it was painful. Xray ordered. No visible injuries noted. 10/9/2024 17:30 . X-ray came out Right Hip fx (fracture) present notified DON and (physician) resident sent to hospital via (ambulance). 10/15/2024 11:34 IDT met to discuss resident fall. Root cause determined to be poor safety awareness r/t dementia, and unsteady gait. Intervention for lipped mattress to be placed in bed. Resident had Xray ordered immediately, with results of fracture, send to ED for further eval/treatment. Care plan reviewed and updated accordingly. 10/13/2024 14:59 Resident readmitted from (hospital), assisted from gurney to bed to recliner chair due to restlessness . 10/15/2024 17:50 Late Entry: admission visit for right hip pain status post ORIF (open reduction internal fixation) . Open reduction internal fixation is a surgical repair of the hip fracture. A review of the facility provided Investigation Form 10/11/2024 revealed CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND INTERVENTIONS . Resident with multiple falls prior to admission . A review of the care plan revealed Focus Fall Risk: (resident) is high risk for falls r/t weakness, incontinence, poor safety awareness Date Initiated: 09/06/2024 . Interventions Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Date Initiated: 09/06/2024 Environment: Keep my room free of potential fall hazards - clutter, spills, tripping hazards, poor lighting, etc. Date Initiated: 09/10/2024 Follow facility fall protocol. Date Initiated: 09/10/2024 Gripper socks to be utilized unless wearing hard/rubber soled shoes Date Initiated: 09/10/2024 Ortho B/P's x 2 days Date Initiated: 09/13/2024 PT to evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN. Date Initiated: 09/10/2024 Focus The resident has had an actual fall with injury Date Initiated: 09/13/2024 . Interventions Date and description of other interventions put in place after a fall: 9/13/24-Supervised when awake while in common areas, sent to ED for stitches to L eyebrow 10/9/24-Xray ordered, New med order rec'd, Lipped mattress, floor mat in place. Date Initiated: 09/13/2024 Resident #2: On 10/23/24, at 11:35 AM, Resident #2 was in their room in their wheelchair. Their family was present. Resident #2 denied they fell and hurt themselves and their family reminded them they fell and broke their hip. A review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Dementia and repeated falls. Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. A review of the Fall Risk Evaluation admission 9/26/2024 revealed total score is 18 Total score of 5 or above is HIGH RISK. A review of the Fall-Unwitnessed . 10/2/2024 21:00 . CNA going to answer call light on C-Hall, when she swa resident seated on floor, called for nurse assistance. This nurse entered room and observed resident lying on her L side, in between her w/c and bed. Legs outstretched, w/no immediate injuries observed. States I tried going by myself but I'm too weak. Unable to state if she was attempting to transfer to bed or bathroom . Confused was check marked. A review of Fall-Unwitnessed . 10/5/2024 09:23 . Resident from across hall called out to writer, Writer observed (resident) laying on the floor, on her right side, with her food tray across the front of her, bed table on it's side, (resident) stretched out towards the bathroom door, hold her left hip complaining of pain . Stated she did not remember than stated she was trying to go to the bathroom . assessed resident for injury, neuros started, lifted with mechanical lift back in to bed. Attempted to assess for injury to left hip but will not allow writer to straighten legs. Once in bed straighten legs, complaining of pain, grabbing hip . Impaired Memory was check marked. A review of the SBAR-Fall . 10/05/2025 . Resident attempted to self transfer to restroom falling on to the floor unwitnessed. Feet close to bed body extend toward restroom door, Resident laying on right side when observed by writer, bed side table tipped over food tray above head . A review of the Fall-Unwitnessed . 10/12/2024 . Staff entered room alerted by resident yelling out. Resident [NAME] on floor on abdomen next to bed in lowest position on mat next to bed with head toward window. Resident incontinent at time of fall. Resident c/o left hip pain. Resident description I was going to the bathroom . immediate action take . new intervention to toilet before breakfast and have resident up in w/c for breakfast. Obtaining x-ray left hip per order . Injury Location Left trochanter (hip) . Confused Impaired Memory were check marked. A review of the Radiology Report Date of Service 10/12/2024 3:07 PM revealed Results: there is an intertrochanteric fracture at the hip. Conclusion: Fractured hip . A review of the progress revealed 10/16/2024 16:18 . Resident returned from hospital via ambulance. Assisted into bed. No c/o pain, staples to left leg have dry dressing covering . A review of the care plan revealed Focus The resident is at risk for falls r/t impaired cognition, deconditioning Date Initiated: 09/26/2024 Goal The resident will be free of minor injury through the review date. Date Initiated: 09/26/2024 Interventions Anti roll backs in wheelchair Date Initiated: 10/23/2024 Anticipate and meet (resident) [NAME] to deter attempting to self transfer Date Initiated: 09/26/2024 Environment: keep my room free of potential fall hazards - clutter, spills, tripping hazards, poor lighting, etc. Date Initiated: 09/27/2024 Follow facility fall protocol. Date Initiated: 09/27/2024 Gripper Socks to be utilized unless wearing hard/rubber soled shoes Date Initiated: 09/27/2024 keep bed in lowest position while I am resting Date Initiated: 09/27/2024 Padded floor mat to exposed side/sides of bed when resting Date Initiated: 09/27/2024 . Focus The resident has had an actual fall with no injury, fall with major injury 10/1/2024 Date Initiated:10/02/2024 Goal The resident will resume usual activities without further incident through the review date. Date Initiated: 10/02/2024 Interventions Date and description of other intervention put in place after a fall: 10/2/24-Bed moved against wall on right side. Resident to transfer with left side which is her strong side. 10/5/24-Resident to be offered to eat at the nurses station or dining room [ROOM NUMBER]/12/24-Xray; up for all meals, toileted before meals, bed flipped against the wall. Will be moved closer to the nurses station when bed becomes available. Grab bars added per family request as well. Date Initiated: 10/14/2024 Resident #3: On 10/23/24, at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was resting in their low bed. There was a mat to the floor on the right side of the bed. The left side of the bed was pushed against the wall. On 10/23/24, at 10:30 AM, a record review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Diabetes and recent subdural hematoma. Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. A review of the Fall Risk Evaluation admission 7/16/2024 revealed total score is 9 Total score of 5 or above is HIGH RISK. A review of Fall - Unwitnessed . 8/5/2024 . Call light activated. CNA entered room and immediately called for nurse assistance. Resident lying on floor next to bed, w/his head in between bed and nightstand. He's alert, taking, w/no obvious s/s of injury. Resident unable to give Description . Confused Gait Imbalance Impaired Memory were all check marked. A review of the SBAR-Fall Effective Date: 8/05/2024 . Call light activated, CNA entered room and immediately called for nurse assistance. Resident lying on floor next to bed, w/ his head in between bed and nightstand. He's alert, talking, w/no obvious s/s of injury. Unable to state what occurred. ROM and neuro-checks WNL. Refusing full set of vitals at the time d/t confusion. Full skin assessment completed, some redness to L ear observed, skin intact . A review of Fall-Unwitnessed . 8/6/2024 19:00 . CNA walking passed resident room and notified nurse of incident. Entered room and observed resident lying on floor next to bed, on his L side. He's alert and talking w/ no obvious injuries observed. Resident unable to give description . Immediate action taken . Non-compliant w/ wearing grippy socks, confused . A review of Fall-Witnessed . 8/17/2024 20:20 . This nurse head others calling out for help and observed resident laying on his back near nurses station. CNA who was sitting at nurses station stated she observed him falling backwards from standing and fell mostly on his back. Resident unable to give account of events r/t dementia . Resident assisted to bed with use of Hoyer lift . Impaired Memory was check marked. A review of the SBAR-Fall . 8/17/2024 . Resident was observed getting up from seated area and observed slipping and falling backwards. Resident was barefoot at time of fall . A review of Fall-Unwitnessed . 8/18/2024 22:50 . Nursing staff entered room to provide care for resident he was noted to be laying on mat next to bed with head toward door. Resident unable to give description . Immediate action taken . Brief was soiled w/ urine and feces . Confused Gait Imbalance Impaired Memory were check marked. A review of Fall-Unwitnessed . 9/1/2024 19:05 . A review of the SBAR-Fall . 09/01/2024 . At 1845 CNA was walking down C hall and called for nurse assistance. Entered resident's room, observed him seated on floor mat next to bed, alert w/no immediate injuries observed. Unable to state what occurred. ROM, neuro-checks and vitals all WNL. Brief was soiled w/urine and feces. Assisted into bed to provided personal hygiene. No injuries observed to skin and no s/s of pain . A review of the focus (resident) is high-risk for falls r/t poor safety awareness: confusion Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 . Interventions Non-slip material to wheelchair cushion. Date Initiated: 10/01/2024 Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 Assist with routine toileting and PRN to help prevent self-transfers Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 Environment: keep room free of potential fall hazards - clutter, spills, tripping hazards, poor lighting, etc Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 Follow facility fall protocol. Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 Gripper socks to be utilized unless wearing hard/rubber soled shoes Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 If resident becomes restless/agitated, bring res into communal area for increased supervision. If resident refuses, remain with resident until directed by nurse Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 PT evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN. Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 The resident needs activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction. Date Initiated: 07/16/2024 On 10/23/24, at 11:30 AM, Resident #3 remained in the same position. On 10/23/24, at 11:55 AM, CNA C and CNA E in to assist Resident #3 with incontinent care. CNA E offered that Resident #2 ate breakfast in bed and remained in bed since. On 10/23/24, at 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding the sampled residents and their multiple falls. The DON was asked if there was anything else the facility could have done to prevent the unwitnessed falls and DON responded, well, I cant have one to one while they are in their rooms. Prior to exit, the DON was asked to provide the day of the most recent unwitnessed fall in the facility and the DON, stated, yesterday. A review of the facility provided Fall Evaluation Safety Guideline Effective Date: 11.28.17 revealed . A fall evaluation is used to identify individuals who have predicting factors for falls . Involve interdisciplinary (IDT) on: Individualized assessment for safety Identification of Hazards Need for Supervision Development and implementation of interventions to reduce accidents . Guideline for Evaluation May include: . Fall history . Impaired mobility/functional status Incontinence Cognitive status Mood or behavior indicators . If the evaluation finds the resident at risk, implement resident specific interventions/precautions .
Mar 2024 17 deficiencies 3 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staff training and supervision during facility van ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staff training and supervision during facility van transportation and appropriate emergency medical response for one (#216) of one resident reviewed resulting in the wheelchair lift platform not being raised during Resident removal from the facility transportation van, Resident #216 being pulled out of the van in their wheelchair without the platform lift elevated, falling, and experiencing unnecessary pain, lacerations, multiple soft tissue injuries, a cervical spine (neck) fracture, and psychosocial distress utilizing the reasonable person concept. Findings include: An interview was conducted with Anonymous Witness M on 2/16/24 at 10:00 AM. Witness M verbalized concerns regarding Resident #216 being pushed out of the facility wheelchair van in the parking lot. Per Witness M, a facility staff member did not put the ramp up on the wheelchair van when they attempted to remove the Resident from the van resulting in the Resident falling and breaking their neck. Witness M revealed they were also concerned because the facility staff moved the Resident into the facility before calling the ambulance and had not reported the incident to the State agency. Record review revealed Resident #216 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximum assistance for transfers, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Per the face sheet, Resident #216 was discharged to another nursing home on 6/1/23. A review of documentation in Resident #216's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: - 6/7/23 at 4:48 PM: SNF to ED Handoff Form . Resident fell off lift from wheelchair van in chair approx. 2 feet . Reason(s) for transfer: Laceration to left great toe, difficulty turning neck, pain in both shoulders and arms . - 6/7/23 at 5:25 PM: Post-Fall Evaluation . Post Fall Follow-up . Is there new pain post fall? Yes . Pain Scale is at: 9 . generalized and severe pain neck, head and shoulders . Injury . Yes . Abrasion . Bruise . Cut . Laceration . multiple abrasions and bruising with laceration see SBAR for completer description . Pain . New . increase due to fall . Pain prior to fall controlled with medication Resident sent to ER for treatment and evaluation . resident c/o (complain) of pain with bilateral arm movements and turning head to right . - 6/7/23 at 6:43 PM: Health Status Note . Resident sent out to hospital at 1640 (4:40 PM) due to fall from transport van, multiple bruises, and abrasions, laceration to right great toe. C/o of shoulder pain both shoulders, bump to back of head and c/o of difficulty turning head to right. - 6/7/23 at 7:03 PM: Resident was being removed from van when both resident and transporter fell to pavement. - 6/13/23 at 7:07 PM: SBAR - Fall . Brief description . Transport was returning resident to facility when both resident and transporter fell out of back of van to pavement . Any injury noted? Yes . Location . Vertebrae (upper-mid) Bruising mid back spine . Right hand (back) abrasion with bruising thumb and knuckles . Left hand (back) abrasion index finger, knuckles, thumb with bruising . Right buttock large bruise . Left buttock bruise . Left knee (front) bruising . Right lower leg (front) bruising inner right shin . Back of head hematoma c/o (complain of) of difficulty turning head to right . Right toe(s) abrasions . Right toe(s) great toe with approx. 2-inch laceration . Left toe(s) abrasions . Right shoulder (rear) Right shoulder bruising with pain . Left shoulder (rear) bruising with pain . hematoma to left upper arm near shoulder painful to touch . left rib bruising . right rib bruising . Type of injury . Swelling . Bruising . Laceration . Hematoma . Decreased Mobility/ROM (Range of Motion) . Pain . Yes . Pain elicited by . Passive ROM . general pain all over severe pain in shoulders, neck and head . Send to ER . Facility Incident and Accident reports for Resident #216 were requested. The facility provided a file which included the following: - Incident and Accident Report, dated 6/7/23: Fall . Location: Outside on facility grounds . Description: Transport was getting resident out of van and both fell to the ground . Immediate Action Taken: Resident was assessed (for) injury. Vitals taken. Right foot was cleaned and bandaged for injury to right great toe. Resident taken to (hospital ER) . Injuries . Abrasion: Left finger(s) . Abrasion: Right fingers . Other (Describe): . in notes at bottom . Level of Pain . 10 (out of 10- worst possible pain) . Alert . Wheelchair bound . Mental Status: Orientated to Person . Situation . Injuries Reported Post Incident: Abrasion: Right toes; Abrasion: Left toes; Abrasion; Left Fingers, Abrasion: Right Fingers; Bruise: Vertebrae (upper-mid); Bruise: Right iliac crest (rear); Bruise: Left iliac crest (rear); Bruise: Right buttocks; Bruise: Left buttocks; Bruise: Right knee (front); Bruise: Left knee (front); Bruise: Right lower leg (front); Bruise: Right shoulder (rear); Fracture: Vertebrae (upper-mid); Hematoma: Back of head; Hematoma: Left upper arm . Other Info: Resident being removed from transport van and both resident and transporter (CNA Q) fell to the ground . Witnesses: (CNA Q) . - Typed, undated summary: On June 7, 2023, Transporter (Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA]) Q was moving (Resident #216) in their wheelchair from the back of the van onto the lift. (CNA Q) wheeled patient from van and didn't realize the rear lift was still in the down position. (CNA Q) stepped off the back of van with (Resident #2216) in wheelchair off the ledge and both fell to the ground. (CNA Q hit the ground first with (Resident #216) sill in their wheelchair, landed on top of them. Receptionist (Staff V) was approaching as the incident occurred and immediately called for assistance. (Registered Nurse [RN] W), (CNA Y), (CNA X) immediately assessed (Resident #216) for pain and injuries then lifted (Resident #216) with mechanical lift into wheelchair. (Resident #216) was then directly lifted into bed for further assessment. After further evaluation, (Resident #216) then complained of shoulder pain . transferred to hospital . - Written, undated statement by RN W: Around 4:30 PM, I was called from another resident room to front of building. (Resident #216) was laying on back with blanket under head. Was told resident and transporter fell out of van. Approx. 2 feet. Resident was assisted up with Hoyer (mechanical lift) to wheelchair and taken back to room for evaluation. Multiple bruising to arms, legs, buttocks, side of hands, and feet. Abrasions to fingers and toes. Hematoma to back of head and upper left arm. Laceration the length of right great toe. Resident c/o (complain of) neck pain, head pain 10/10 (worse possible pain) and pain to arms and shoulders 9/10, Resident set to hospital after notifying Doctor for further evaluation and possible sutures to toe . - Written statement by CNA Y, dated 6/7/23 (no time): I was standing at the nurses' station around 4:30 PM when (Staff V) yelled to me for help. I ran out behind them. I seen (Resident #216) and (CNA Q) on the ground. The nurses (RN I), (RN W) and (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] Z) checked Resident . Hoyered (Resident #216) back into wheelchair . - Written statement by CNA Q, dated 6/7/23 at 4:20 PM: I transported three residents back to the facility at 4:20 PM. Two residents . were unloaded safely and brought back to their rooms with the help from (Staff V). (Resident #216) was the last one to get out sine they were sitting in the middle part of the van . I used the passenger side door to get back in the van to get resident not realizing the van list is still position to the ground. I pulled resident's wheelchair to get to the platform and we were both on the ground. I had the wheelchair with the O2 (oxygen) tank and the resident on top of me. (Staff V) saw me and the resident on the ground and they immediately called for help. Resident was assessed and was put back in their chair . - Written statement by CNA Q, dated 6/13/23 (no time): I sat with (Resident #216) at 6:28 PM while I was waiting to be seen by and ED provider. At 7:40 PM, Residents family arrived in room. (Family AA) was there ans said they couldn't understand how it happened. (Family AA) looked at me and asked if I was there when it did. I said I was and informed them that I was the one who transported (Resident #216). I explained to them what happened, apologized for what happened . - Written statement by CNA X, dated 6/7/23 at 4:30 PM: I was coming down hall when a resident had pointed to the window and said 'Look!!' I looked out the window and seen (CNA Q) and (Resident #216) laying on the ground behind the van. I ran out to help. We hoyered (Resident #216) back into chair, transferred to bed. An interview was conducted with CNA G on 3/20/24 at 2:09 PM. When queried if they were working on 6/7/23 when there was an incident involving Resident #216, CNA G stated, I was the transporter at that time. When asked what happened, CNA G stated, On the way back (to the facility), I had two more residents in the back. (Resident #216) was sitting closer to me. When asked to clarify if they were saying they were transporting three residents back to the facility, CNA G confirmed they were. CNA G revealed they had to pick up an extra resident on the way back to the facility. When asked what happened when they got to the facility, CNA G revealed they got the other resident's out of the van and stated receptionist Staff V helped me and took the first resident in. CNA G continued, For some reason, I didn't put the platform up after I got the first resident out and took them back to their room. I went back and went through the door to get (Resident #216). When asked what they meant when they said door, CNA G indicated they went through the side entrance door of the van. CNA G revealed they proceeded to unhook Resident #216's wheelchair after they reentered the van through the side door and stated, I backed them out the back. In my head, the platform was up. CNA G continued, I didn't even look, I was just backing up. The next thing I knew, I was on the ground and the wheelchair and (Resident #216) and the oxygen were on top of me. CNA G verbalized they pushed the Resident off of them after they fell. CNA G was asked what time it happened and replied, It was close to 4:30 PM. CNA G stated, I believe it was the receptionist who came out and found us on the ground. CNA G indicated they believed Staff V called for help. CNA G stated, We had nurses and aides out there too and then they brought (Resident #216) in and assessed them. CNA G relayed the Resident was then transported to the hospital. When asked how far they fell, CNA G replied, I believe it was a two-foot drop. When asked if they received any education and/or disciplinary actions following the occurrence, CNA G revealed they do not drive anymore. CNA G was asked if the Resident was injured and stated, (Resident #216) broke their neck. They already had a fracture. CNA G revealed they had no injuries, other than being sore, following the incident. An interview was completed with Resident #216's Family Member AA on 3/20/24 at 2:30 PM. When queried regarding the incident involving Resident #216 and the transportation van on 6/7/23, Family AA stated, (Resident #216) fractured the vertebrae in their neck and got stitches in their toe. Family AA stated, (Resident #216) wasn't being taken care of (at facility) and fell out (of the van) backwards. When asked if they were informed of what had occurred by the facility, Family AA revealed a facility nurse contacted them and informed them the Resident had fallen from the van during removal and had been sent to the hospital. Family AA indicated they did not realize what actually happened until they got to the hospital. When queried what happened at the hospital, Family AA revealed Resident #216 had to be transferred from the local hospital to a larger hospital. When asked why the Resident was transferred, Family AA revealed the Resident needed to see a specialist for their neck and was at the larger hospital for a week or two. Family AA specified the fracture could have been prevented if facility staff would have done what they were supposed to do. On 3/21/24 at 8:33 AM, an observation of the transportation van was completed. A measurement of the back of the van to the group revealed the distance was 28 inches. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/21/24 at 8:43 AM. When queried regarding facility investigation completion, the DON revealed the Administrator had completed the investigation. The Administrator was out of state and unavailable. When queried regarding other Residents in the van, the DON stated, I didn't know there was anyone else. When asked if the facility had documentation of demonstration and check offs of van transportation for loading and unloading residents for CNA G the DON stated, No check offs. The transportation schedule for Residents on 6/7/23 was requested at this time. At 8:50 AM on 3/21/24, the DON approached this Surveyor and stated there was one other Resident who had been transported on the day of the incident, but they had been removed from the van prior to the fall. When queried regarding CNA G stating there had been three residents, the DON indicated they just spoke to CNA G and confirmed there were only two residents. A follow up interview was completed with CNA G on 3/21/24 at 8:57 AM. When asked if there were two or three residents in the transportation van on 6/7/23 when the incident occurred involving Resident #216, CNA G stated there was (discharged Resident #1) and then I had to pick up (discharged Resident #2). CNA G stated, I wasn't expecting to pick up (discharged Resident #2) so I got (discharged Resident #1) out of their wheelchair and sat them on the seat. When asked what they did with the wheelchair, CNA G revealed they folded it up. When queried why they told the DON there were only two residents in the transportation van, CNA G indicated they had forgot. Review of CNA G's education and training completion documentation prior to 6/7/23 revealed no documentation of van lift use and competency. An interview was completed with Staff V on 3/21/24 at 9:20 AM. When queried if they were working on 6/7/23, Staff V confirmed they were. When asked what happened, Staff V stated, I saw (CNA G) pull in. It was such a traumatic thing. Upon request, Staff V was provided a copy of their witness statement for review. Staff V then stated, (CNA G) got the one (resident) off and I wheeled them where they needed to go. When asked, Staff V was unable to recall the name of the resident they took into the facility. When queried what time it was, Staff V stated, It had to be right around 4:30 PM because that is when I leave. Staff V revealed they went back out to see if CNA G needed more help before they left for the day and stated, As soon as I walked out, I seen them on the ground. I ran back in and hollered for help. When asked, Staff V revealed they were going back to see if CNA G needed more help before they left for the day. When asked what they observed when they exited the building, Staff V stated, (CNA G) was on their back on the ground and the Resident was on the ground next to them on their back. When asked where Resident #216's wheelchair was, Staff V revealed they did not recall seeing the wheelchair. When asked, Staff V stated both CNA G and Resident #216 were on the concrete outside of the building on their backs with the Resident closest to the door. Staff V was asked if either the Resident or CNA G were touching the platform that raises and lowers and stated It (platform) was flat. When asked what they meant, Staff V stated, It was parallel with the van exit, like it was never lowered. Staff V continued, The back of the platform had the lip, (CNA G) may have tripped and pulled (Resident #216) down. When asked, Staff V reiterated they were certain the platform was up and parallel with the back of the van. Staff V was asked to draw a picture. The picture showed both CNA V and Resident #216 past the end of the raised platform on the concrete with Resident #216 closest to the door of the facility. Staff V then stated, Both of them hit their heads. When queried regarding Resident #216, Staff V stated, The Resident was moaning and was obviously in a lot of pain. Staff V revealed CNA G was more concerned about the Resident. Staff V was asked what happened next and stated, (LPN Z) and (CNA X) came out. I think (CNA X) seen from a Resident room. At 9:36 AM on 3/21/24, Staff V re-entered the conference room and indicated they made a mistake during their previous interview. When asked what they meant, Staff V stated, It (platform) was down, not up. When asked, Staff V stated both the Resident and CNA G were on the concrete past the end of the platform on their backs. No further explanation and/or description was provided when asked. An interview was completed with LPN Z on 3/21/24 at 9:41 AM. When queried if they were working on 6/7/23, LPN Z replied that they were. LPN Z was asked if they recalled the incident involving Resident #216 and the transport van on that day, LPN Z stated, I know (Resident #216) had an appointment and (CNA G) had taken them. LPN Z stated the receptionist had yelled for help and they responded along with other staff. When queried what they observed, LPN Z stated, (Resident #216) was on the ground and revealed there were multiple people outside at that time. LPN Z stated, Somebody got the Hoyer and indicated the Resident was placed in their wheelchair using the lift. When queried who got the Resident off the ground and into the wheelchair using the Hoyer lift, LPN Z replied, The aides (CNAs). When queried if they had completed an assessment of the Resident, LPN Z replied, (RN W) would have done an assessment. LPN Z was then asked where Resident #216's oxygen tank and wheelchair were at when they observed the Resident and stated, on the ground next to them. When asked the position of the platform, LPN Z indicated it was down. On 3/21/24 at 10:03 AM, an interview was completed with CNA X. When queried regarding the incident on 6/7/23 involving Resident #216 and the transport van, CNA X revealed they did not see it happen and stated, A resident alerted me to them being on the ground. CNA X indicated they looked out the window and both CNA G and Resident #216 were on the ground and the wheelchair was tipped sideways. CNA X stated, I went out and by the time I got there, (CNA G) was up. When asked what happened next, CNA X stated, We had to grab the Hoyer to get (Resident #216) up. When queried if Resident #216 was in pain, CNA X stated, Oh yeah. CNA G was asked who transferred the Resident in the Hoyer lift and revealed it was the CNA staff but was unable to recall staff names. When asked how they got the Resident into the sling, CNA X replied, We had to roll (Resident #216). When queried if Resident #216 expressed pain and/or discomfort when being rolled and transferred in the Hoyer, CNA X replied, Yeah and stated Resident #216 was grimacing. CNA X was asked if anyone braced and/or supported the Resident's head and neck when the Resident was being rolling and transferred in the Hoyer, CNA X replied, Not that I remember. At 10:13 AM on 3/21/24, an interview was completed with the DON. When asked, the DON revealed the facility has some video camera surveillance. When queried regarding footage of the incident involving Resident #216 and the transport van on 6/7/23, the DON stated there were no cameras in the front of the building and no footage of the incident. An interview was conducted with RN W on 3/21/24 at 12:07 PM. When queried what occurred on 6/7/23 involving Resident #216, RN W stated, I was called up front because an employee and Resident on the ground. RN W then stated, I knew the Resident was hurt pretty bad. We sent them out to the hospital, and they never came back. When asked how the Resident was hurt pretty bad, RN W replied, Lacerations and pain. When asked Resident #216 was bleeding, RN W stated, Yes. I can't remember if the laceration was on their head, and they had pain. When queried if they assessed the Resident when they were outside, RN W revealed they listened to their lungs, got vital signs, and asked where hurt. When asked if the Resident was having pain, RN W indicated they were and stated, (Resident #216) was a tough person and didn't like to complain. When asked what they did next, RN W stated, Hoyered (Resident #216) up and took them to their room and did a more thorough assessment. When queried if the Resident's neck was immobilized prior to moving the Resident, RN W stated, I don't think so. RN W was asked if they considered applying a cervical collar (c-collar) for immobilization and replied, We don't have c-collars. When asked if they considered using a backboard, rather than the Hoyer lift, to transfer the Resident due to the mechanism of the fall and potential extent of injuries, RN W stated, I don't think we even have one. When asked why they did not call EMS immediately, when the Resident was outside rather than moving them, RN W stated, I don't know. We had to get (Resident #216) inside to assess them. When queried regarding the location of the wheelchair and the oxygen tank, RN W indicated they did not know and stated, I don't know if (Resident#216) was in the wheelchair originally. When asked what they meant, RN W revealed they did not know if the Resident was seated in their wheelchair when they fell out of the transport van. When queried regarding the Resident's position when they first saw them, RN W stated, Think maybe (Resident #216) was sitting but I'm not sure. On 3/21/24 at 12:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was asked what their expectations of nursing staff in response to an incident when a resident is pulled out of a wheelchair van backwards directly onto the pavement and stated, A full head to toe (assessment), vital signs, neuros. When queried why Resident #216 was moved and transferred using a Hoyer lift without cervical spine immobilization, the DON stated, (Resident #216) didn't complain of pain right away. The DON was then asked why documentation specified the Resident complained of generalized and severe pain neck, head and shoulders but did not indicate the Resident had no pain initially and did not provide an explanation. When queried why the Resident was transferred using a Hoyer lift and without cervical spinal immobilization, the DON stated, That is the standard. When asked what they meant, the DON revealed it was the standard to use a Hoyer lift for a Resident who fell. When queried if being pulled out of a wheelchair van backwards in a wheelchair onto the concrete/pavement was a typical mechanism of injury for a fall, the DON confirmed it was not. The DON was then asked if the facility had cervical spinal immobilizers (c-collars) and stated, No. When asked why Resident #216 was moved, when the facility did not have the equipment to provide cervical spinal immobilization, and the SBAR assessment specified Resident #216 was having severe pain, the DON stated, I was not there. The DON indicated the Resident was transferred to the hospital in a timely manner. When queried if the Resident was transferred from the ground to a wheelchair using a Hoyer lift and then from the wheelchair to their bed, the DON confirmed and asked, Would a couple of minutes make a difference? When queried regarding cervical spinal immobilization, the DON stated, Yes, I agree the movement may have made a difference. Review of EMS documentation revealed dated 5/7/23 reviewed EMS was called at 5:00 PM by the facility for a fall at the facility. The EMS report detailed, Primary Impression: Multiple injuries . Fall with injury . Distress: Moderate Fall . 2 feet . Mechanism of Injury: Blunt . Trauma . Assessment Time: 5:06 PM . Narrative: Dispatched for a fall . Arrived to find (Resident #216) sitting on edge of bed. Staff on scene states that (Resident) was being taken out of the wheelchair van on the lift when they fell off the lift approximately 2 feet up . fell on another employee . States has laceration on foot . Goose egg noted to right side of head. Swelling and pain to left upper arm . bruising noted to both legs, hands, and feet. 4 cm (centimeter) laceration to right foot, toenail ripped off big toe on left foot . A second EMS report was received and revealed Resident #216 was transferred from the local hospital to a tertiary hospital for specialty services on 6/8/24 at 2:45 AM. Review of Resident #216's hospital documentation revealed the following: - 6/7/23 at 5:39 PM: ED Provider Notes . Review of Systems . Musculoskeletal: Positive for back pain and neck pain. Skin: Positive for wound . Laceration to right great toe, multiple abrasions to hands and feet . Positive for headaches . C-Collar has been applied. Does have pain with palpation. There is ecchymosis and point tenderness noted approximate T1 (First Thoracic Spine Vertebra) . Comments . There are multiple abrasions noted to the dorsal surface of toes and fingers. There is a laceration noted to the dorsal surface of great toe that will require repair . Patient has history of dementia and is a poor historian . alert to person and place . does recall the fall . Laceration Repair . Laceration details: Location . R big toe. Length (cm): 3 . Depth (mm): 3 . Repair method: Sutures . Medical Decision Making: Patient has been seen and evaluated in the emergency department for a fall . out of a van from the floor level onto the ground . did sustain a C2 (Second Cervical Spinal Vertebra) fracture . also has multiple abrasions noted to hands and feet . right great toe laceration requiring repair . I did speak with the radiologist regarding CT (Computed Tomography scan) of the C-spine as has had previous neck fracture in the past. This is a new fracture when compared to most recent CT. I did speak with (Specialist Physician) at (Tertiary hospital) and the patient will be transferred as a trauma for further evaluation and treatment . - 6/7/23 at 5:49 PM: ED Triage Notes (Nursing) . Patient fell at (facility). Ems states patient fell forward out of wheelchair onto a staff member. Patient did hit head . L arm pain, laceration to R foot and part of L great toenail removed in fall . - 6/7/23, Resulted 10:35 PM: CT cervical spine without contrast (trauma age >65) . There is a new tip of C2 spinous process fracture with 3 mm of distraction of the tip fragments . Final Result . 1. New tip of C2 spinous process fracture . - 6/7/23, Resulted 10:24 PM: CT head without contrast .Head trauma, moderate-severe . There is a right posterolateral frontal scalp hematoma . Final Result . Right lateral scalp hematoma . Review of facility policy/procedure entitled, Patient Transport Van: Safety Policy (no date) did not include any information pertaining to loading and/or unloading residents utilizing the wheelchair platform.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for pressure ulcer (wounds caused by pressure) prevention and management and care, including timely and appropriate wound identification for four residents (Resident #22, Resident #23, Resident #30, and Resident #37) of seven residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of proper identification and care of Resident #22's and Resident #23's pressure ulcers, Resident #30 developing an unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- area of damage to underlying tissue with unknown depth) pressure ulcer, and Resident #37 developing a DTI pressure ulcer, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for further pressure ulcer development and a decline in overall condition. Findings include: Resident #23: On 3/19/24 at 3:57 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O. When queried regarding Residents with pressure ulcers and/or wounds, CNA O stated, (Resident #23) has something. With further inquiry, CAN's O indicated they were unsure what type of wound the Resident had. On 3/19/24 at 4:00 PM, an observation occurred of Resident #23 in their room. The room was dark with the lights off. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back, wearing a hospital style gown The Resident's eyes were open. Resident #23 made eye contact when spoke to but provided non-sensical responses to questions. An alternating air mattress was noted on the bed. An interview was conducted with CAN's T on 3/20/24 at 8:39 AM. When queried regarding residents with pressure ulcers, CAN's T stated, (Resident #23) had open sores on their bottom. When asked if the wounds were caused from pressure, CAN's T indicated they were. Record review revealed Resident #23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one sided paralysis), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and aphasia (difficulty to use or comprehend language) following cerebral infarction (stroke), weakness, falls, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was rarely/never understood and was dependent upon staff for completion of all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the exception of eating. The MDS further revealed the Resident was at risk for pressure ulcer development, did not have any pressure ulcers, but did have Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) at the time of assessment completion. The Review of Resident #23's care plans revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #23) has actual impairment to skin integrity AEB (As Evidenced By): MASD (Moisture-Associated Skin Damage) right and left buttock (Initiated: 2/1/24). The care plan was changed on 2/1/24 from, (Resident #23) actual impairment to skin integrity AEB: Stage 2 pressure ulcer right buttock. Review of Resident #23's care plans revealed the Resident had a care plan titled, (Resident #23) has actual impairment to skin integrity AEB: Stage 2 pressure ulcer right buttock which was changed on 2/1/24 to (Resident #23) has actual impairment to skin integrity AEB (As Evidenced By): MASD (Moisture-Associated Skin Damage) right and left buttock (Initiated: 2/1/24). The care plan included the following interventions: - Evaluate and treat per physician's orders (Initiated: 2/13/24) - Apply barrier cream per facility protocol to help protect skin from excess moisture (Initiated: 2/13/24) - Educate resident/family/caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury (Initiated: 2/13/24) - Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin (Initiated: 2/13/24) - Identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolve where possible (Initiated: 2/13/24) - Monitor/document location, size and treatment of skin injury. Report abnormalities, failure to heal . to MD (Initiated: 2/13/24) On 3/20/24 at 8:45 AM, Resident #23 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. Resident #23 made eye contact and made non-sensical verbal responses when spoke to. When asked if they were able to move their legs, Resident #23 did not move their legs and shook their head to indicate no. Review of Resident #23's Wound Evaluation and wound image documentation in the EMR revealed an assessment dated [DATE] at 2:21 PM. The evaluation detailed, MASD . Right Gluteus - Medial . Deteriorating - 9 months old . In-House Acquired . Length: 2.47 cm . Width: 0.93 cm . Wound Bed . Granulation . Exudate . Light . Serosanguineous . Edges . Non-attached . The attached wound picture with measuring sticker was noted to be off center in the image. The wound was oval shaped with distinct edges and visible depth. The wound bed in the image was light pink and red in color with white tissue at the 12 and 5 o'clock positions. The initial date of the wound specifically identified and unable to be determined and a review of progress note documentation was completed. The following documentation was present in Resident #23's EMR: - 3/13/24 at 9:27 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0 (Zero) . Skin turgor with good elasticity . Skin temperature is warm (normal). Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal. Continues with treatment to buttocks. - 3/6/24 at 9:28 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0 (Zero) . Skin turgor with good elasticity . Skin temperature is warm (normal). Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal. - 2/15/2024 15:23 Type: *IDT . Residents MASD wounds on buttocks are worsening at this time. Resident will be started on pro-stat (nutritional supplement for individuals with increased protein needs, malnutrition, and pressure ulcers) per (physician) and resident will be encouraged to lay down between meals at this time. Treatment orders will continue to be the same . - 2/1/24 at 3:12 PM: Nursing Evaluation . skin integrity concerns. 0 (zero) . - 1/18/24 at 3:23 PM: IDT . Wound is almost healed, will continue to monitor weekly at this time. No further concerns . - 11/26/23 at 12:58 AM: Skin/Wound Note (Narrative) . Upon rounding on resident and changing hydrocolloid dressing (wound care dressing used for mildly exudating wounds to provide a moist wound healing environment) 2 more areas of open skin noted next to current open area on right buttock. Dressing increased to larger size . - 10/29/23 at 5:37 PM: Nursing Evaluation Quarterly assessment . Skin Integrity: The resident does not have skin integrity concerns . Resident get excoriation to buttock due to incontinence, ointment applied as preventive . - 9/29/23 at 2:56 PM: IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) . MASD noted to R buttock, wound previously closed, continues with incontinence, and wound has opened back up. Surrounding wound is boggy and white/purple . - 9/27/23 at 12:16 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0 . L (left) buttock: open area 0.5 cm in length, 0.2 cm wide, slough noted in wound bed, area cleansed, and current treatments applied. - 8/23/23 at 1:28 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0 . Skin temperature is warm (normal). Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal. Left buttock open area has healed to small pin-like open area, cream applied. - 8/15/23 10:50 AM: Skin/Wound Note (Narrative) LATE ENTRY . wound NP (Nurse Practitioner) in facility this day and resolved buttock wound . - 7/29/23 at 4:47 PM: Nursing Evaluation . Skin Integrity: The resident has skin integrity concerns. 0 (zero) . - 7/26/23 at 3:13 PM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0 . Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal. Continue to apply cream to buttocks . - 7/19/23 at 3:24 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NEW skin issue(s) observed. 1 . Small open areas on bilateral inner buttocks . Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal . - 3/20/23 at 9:26 PM: Physician . Progress Note . Right gluteal wound Stage III. Skin Intact . - 3/2/23 at 3:15 PM: Physician . Progress Note . Right gluteal wound . Stage III (open wound with full thickness tissue loss). 3.0 (cm) x 1.0 (cm) . Authored by Wound Care Physician. An interview was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) J on 3/20/24 at 11:10 AM. When queried if the facility had a wound care nurse, RN J revealed they did not. When queried regarding Resident #23's wound, RN J stated, I believe (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] R) is doing that today. On 3/20/24 at 11:13 AM, an interview was completed with LPN R. When queried regarding Resident #23's wound care treatment, LPN R confirmed they were completing wound care measurements and treatments. A request to observe Resident #23's wound was completed at this time. On 3/21/24 at 10:22 AM, Resident #23 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the Activity room of the facility. On 3/21/24 at 3:12 PM, an observation of Resident #23's wound was completed with LPN R. The Resident was in bed and positioned on their side. The wound bed was elongated and slightly larger than a half dollar. The wound had visible depth and defined borders. The wound bed was pink and red with white colored tissue on the lateral side, from approximately 12 o'clock to 4 o'clock. The wound was noted to be located over the bony prominence of the ischial tuberosity (bony prominence in lower pelvis) on the right gluteus. The periwound was discolored and darkened with a reddened area proximal to the open wound. An interview was conducted with LPN R following the wound care observation. When queried why the wound was not classified as a pressure ulcer, LPN R replied the wound had been there was a long time and had opened and closed. LPN R then stated the wound had recently deteriorated and a new treatment had been ordered. When asked if an area could begin as MASD and then become a pressure ulcer, LPN R stated it could. LPN R was asked if the wound was over a bony prominence and had defined borders and confirmed it was. LPN R was asked again how the wound was not a pressure ulcer and replied, It could be. When queried why there were no depth measurements of the wound documented, LPN R revealed the facility utilizes the wound imaging system for wounds and it does not measure wound depth. No further explanation was provided. Resident #30: On 3/19/24 at 3:57 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN's) O. When queried regarding Residents with pressure ulcers, CAN's O stated, (Resident #30) has something on their heel. With further inquiry, CAN's O revealed the area on their heel was black from the Resident's heel dragging when they were in their wheelchair. When asked if the Resident was able to move both of their legs, CAN's O revealed the Resident had a stroke which affected their left side. When queried how the Resident's foot was dragged, CAN's O specified the Resident did not usually have foot pedals in place on their wheelchair. Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact, had one sided upper and lower extremity impaired Range of Motion (ROM), and required substantial to total assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The MDS further revealed the Resident was at risk for pressure ulcer development but did not have any pressure ulcers at the time of assessment completion. Review of Resident #30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the Resident had a care plan entitled, The resident has potential for impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) diabetes, obesity, impaired mobility, neuropathy (Initiated: 4/3/23). The care plan included the interventions: - Apply barrier cream per facility protocol to help protect skin from excess moisture (Initiated: 4/10/23) - Encourage that heels are elevated while resident is lying in bed . (Initiated: 4/10/23) - Change bedding/clothing if moist (Initiated: 7/18/23) - Dietary Consult as needed (Initiated: 4/10/23) - Encourage/assist with turning and repositioning (Initiated: 4/10/23) - Monitor skin when providing cares, notify nurse of any changes in skin appearance (Initiated: 4/10/23) The Resident did not have a care plan in place related to a current pressure ulcer/alteration in skin integrity. Further review of Resident #30's EMR revealed the Resident had a pressure ulcer on the left heel in May 2023 which had healed. Review of documentation in Resident #30's EMR revealed the following: - 3/13/24 at 9:37 AM: Skin Observation . Resident has NO NEW skin issue(s) observed. 0. Skin turgor with good elasticity. Skin color is normal for ethnic group. Skin temperature is warm (normal). Skin moisture is normal. Skin condition is normal. - 3/15/24 at 3:10 PM: Health Status Note . left heel is redden (sic) and soft, comfort foam applied for cushioning. Res to wear heel boots at all times. (Spouse) notified, voiced concern that heel has opened many times when resident walks even short distances. Resident #30's EMR did not contain wound assessment documentation. Review of Resident #30's health care provider orders revealed the Resident did not have an active order for heel boots. On 3/20/24 at 11:54 AM, Resident #30 was observed being pushed down the hallway of the facility in their wheelchair by Therapy Staff N toward the dining room. The Resident had a soft heel boot in place on their left foot and a regular foot covering in place on their right foot. After taking Resident #30 into the dining room, an interview was completed with Therapy Staff N. When queried why Resident #30 had a heel boot in place on their left foot, Therapy Staff N stated, I'm not sure. Therapy Staff revealed the Resident's foot is a bit internally rotated and indicated the heel boot may be related to that. On 3/20/24 at 4:40 PM, an interview was completed with CAN's Q. When queried regarding observation of Resident #30 with a heel boot in place on their left foot only, CAN's Q replied, Supposed to have a bandage on heel. When asked the reason for the bandage, CAN's Q indicated they were not sure. An interview was completed with Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R on 3/20/24 at 4:41 PM. When queried regarding Resident #30's left heel, LPN R stated, I wasn't here and revealed they were unaware of any concerns regarding the Resident's heel. When queried regarding the progress note dated 3/15/4 in Resident #30's EMR, LPN R reviewed the progress note documentation. When queried if there was any documentation after the note on 3/15/24, LPN R confirmed there was no additional assessment documentation. Upon request, an observation of Resident #30's left heel was completed with LPN R at this time. Upon entering Resident #30's room, the Resident was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room with their feet directly on the floor. When queried regarding their left heel, Resident #30 stated it hurt. When asked how long it had been hurting, Resident #30 replied, About a week. LPN R removed the heel boot and sock on Resident #30's left foot. There was no bandage in place over the Resident's heel. The medial edge of the heel was dark red in color with a deep, dark, purplish colored area, slightly larger than a dime was present in the center of the dark red area. When queried if the dark red area was blanchable, LPN R proceeded to press on the area and stated, No. Following the wound care observation, LPN R was queried regarding the wound and stated that it was an unstageable pressure ulcer. When queried regarding the facility policy/procedure related to notification of alteration in skin integrity and implementation of treatments/interventions, LPN R stated, Usually reported to the Unit Manager and then the DON (Director of Nursing). LPN R then stated, Was supposed to have a foam cushion in it and did not have it. When queried regarding staff statements related to the pressure ulcer, LPN R did not provide an explanation. When queried if Resident #30 had an order in place for the heel boot, LPN R confirmed there was no order for the heel boots. The DON entered LPN R's office at this time. When queried regarding the unstageable pressure ulcer on Resident #30's heel, the DON stated, It wasn't brought to my attention. After reviewing Resident #30's EMR, the DON stated, I do remember talking about this on Friday and indicated they did not see the area the nurse had identified on Resident #30's left heel and planned to follow up, but had not. When queried why there was no follow up assessment documentation of the pressure ulcer, the DON revealed there should have been. No further explanation was provided. Record review of the facility 'Skin Protection Guideline', dated 7/7/2021, the purpose was to provide evidenced based practice standards for the care and treatment of skin. To ensure residents that admit and reside at our facility are evaluated and provided individualized interventions to prevent, reduce and treat skin breakdown. here was no mention of 'Moisture Associated Skin Damage' within the facility skin management procedure. Record review of the National Pressure Injury Advisor Panel (NPIAP) staging tool (undated) revealed that there was no mention of a Moisture Associated Skin Damage. Resident #22: Observation on 03/19/24 at 10:54 AM of Resident #22 lying in bed on his back with the head of the bed elevated estimated above 30-degree angle, Resident appears asleep. Roommate is awake and stated he doesn't roll over, that's how he sleeps on his back. In an observation on 03/19/24 04:32 PM the state surveyor observed Resident #22 to be ambulating in the main hallway with gray sweat pants on and what appeared to be 2-3 red spots noted on the back of the pants on lower aspect of the buttock region. Record review of Resident #22's OBRA quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a younger special-needs gentleman who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #22's electronic medical record revealed a skin/wound evaluation dated 3/19/2024 at 11:07 AM and noted right ischial tuberosity wound in-house acquired measurements: length 0.81cm X width 0.79cm. Review of the percent-changed graph noted the wound started on 8/1/2023. Record review of left ischial tuberosity in-house acquired evaluation dated 3/6/2024 developed over a year prior, measurements: length 2.72cm X width 1.27cm. Observation on 03/20/24 at 08:31 AM with Certified Nurse Assistant L, who had just given Resident #22 a morning shower, revealed there were observed 4 open areas, with bleeding. Observation of the 4 open wound areas revealed red beefy tissue with depth noted. Resident #22 was asked if the 4 open wounds were painful, and he shook his head up and down for yes. In an observation on 03/20/24 at 08:35 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)/infection control/Unit manager E came into the shower room on the west unit to assess the wounds of Resident #22. RN E applied calaseptine cream to all open areas. RN E stated that the facility called the wounds moisture associated skin damage. Resident #37: Record review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed section M: skin conditions revealed that the resident #37 was admitted with one unstageable pressure injury and also developed another unstageable pressure injury while residing at the facility. In an interview on 03/19/24 at 03:33 PM with Resident #37 revealed that she did have bilateral heel pressure injuries. Resident #37 stated that she was in the hospital and the right heel sore just showed up. Then she came back to the facility and a while later (months) after being back at the facility the left heel got a sore also. Resident #37 stated that she was so sick during the time that they just didn't keep the feet off the mattress. Resident #37 stated that she does get wound clinic treatments for the heel wounds. Record review of Resident #37's left heel pressure injury in-house acquired evaluation, dated 3/13/2024, revealed the area of the left heel pressure injury status as deteriorating and over 7 months old. Measurements: length 3.78cm X width 2.38cm, no depth measurements were taken. Area measurement of 6.83cm covered most of the left heel. Record review of Resident #37's 'Skin & Wound Evaluation' form dated 3/20/2024 at 12:02 PM revealed pressure staged as deep tissue injury and in-house acquired, measuring 8.5cm area, length 3.6cm X width 3.1cm. No depth was measured. Progress was noted as stalled. Observation and interview on 03/20/24 at 08:16 AM with the Registered Nurse/Unit manager (RN/UM) E the surveyor Observation of bilateral heels had a plain gauze dressing wrapped in white Kerlix gauze and taped. The old dressing was removed and observation of the right heel being black in color. Observation of the left facility acquired pressure injury revealed the left heel had drainage noted to the old dressing which was removed. RN E applied wound cleanser with 4 x 4 gauze and then patted dry. RN E then applied Dermacal (treatment) to wound bed, cut to size, and covered with 4 x 4 gauze, Resident #37 stated that she went to the wound clinic last Tuesday 3/12/24. RN E stated that the dressing was removed the day prior by the Director of Nursing who took it off yesterday and did not apply the complete dressing. RN E proceeded to apply the Unna boot with Zinc and calamine 3inX10yards. that is changed one time weekly. This dressing was not in place at the beginning of the wound observation. In an interview on 03/20/24 at 08:16 AM, during the bilateral heel dressing changes Resident #37 revealed that she stated she got the wounds from lying in bed and goes to the wound clinic now. Resident #37 stated she got the wounds from here (facility), they just showed up. Resident #37 stated that the wounds are painful. At the pain clinic they debride/scrape them, and it hurts.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Record review revealed that resident #40 is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], currently on hospice, has a brief...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Record review revealed that resident #40 is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], currently on hospice, has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a 6 indicating severe impairment. Resident #40 has diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gait abnormalities, lack of coordination, repeated falls, unsteady on feet, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. On 03/20/24 at 12:53 PM, record review of resident #40's fall reports revealed that resident #40 sustained falls on 4/19/23, 7/10/23, 7/12/23, 7/28/23, 7/30/23, 8/9/23, 8/14/23, 11/17/23 and 3/4/24. Eight of these falls were unwitnessed. Fall sustained on 7/10/23, resident #40 was observed on the floor in their room, resident #40 had self transferred, the fall was unwitnessed. Care plan interventions included a medication review and to use call light. BIMS was 10 indicating moderate impairment. Fall sustained on 7/12/23, unwitnessed fall in the room, resident #40 observed on the floor on their left side about two feet from the entrance door, spilled water was observed on the floor. Fall report indicated that Resident #40 stated they had been reaching for water, slid out of bed and scooted over to the door. Care plan interventions included: offer to take resident to the bathroom two times a night. Fall sustained on 7/28/23, this was an unwitnessed fall, resident #40 was observed on the floor in the bathroom, stated they hit head on the trash can. Care plan interventions included: post fall med review, take to the restroom after meals, grippy socks. Fall sustained on 7/30/23, this was an unwitnessed fall, resident #40 was observed lying on her right side, head under the sink, legs bent at the knees, feet towards the bed. resident #40 stated they hit the right side of their head, unsure of what they hit it on. Resident #40 complained of sharp pain with any movement of their right arm. Resident sustained a right clavicle fracture. The family was notified of the fall, the physician was notified of the fall and resident #40 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Care plan interventions: education on using call light to ask for assistance. BIMS 10, moderate impairment. Fall sustained on 8/9/23, this was an unwitnessed fall, resident #40's roommate called the certified nursing assistant (CAN's) to the room, resident #40 was observed on the floor mat next to their bed, fall report indicated that resident #40 stated they tried to get out of bed to go to the bathroom. No injury. The fall was unwitnessed. Care plan interventions included: perform a medication review. Fall sustained on 8/14/23, resident #40's roommate came to nurses station reporting that resident #40 is on the floor. This was an unwitnessed fall. Resident #40 noted to be sitting next to the bed on the floor mat, denies hitting head, resident #40 stated they couldn't find their call light because it was attached to their blankets and got twisted up. No injury noted. No neuro assessments. Care plan intervention to put the call light on the bed and not the blankets to avoid this happening again. BIMS of 4. Fall sustained on 11/17/23 fall report indicated that resident #40's anti-roll back brakes failed on the wheelchair during self transfer and resulted in a fall. This was an unwitnessed fall. Care plan interventions included repairing the anti-roll back brakes. Fall sustained on 3/4/24, this was an unwitnessed fall, resident #40 noted to be kneeling in her room between bed and wheelchair. Resident #40 had vomited and attempted self transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. Fall report indicated that resident #40 had been complaining of nausea the previous shift, a new order for zofran as needed was put in place. No injuries noted, BIMS 6. On 03/21/24 at 09:32 AM, record review of resident #40's care plan revealed resident was a 1-2 staff assist with transfers. On 03/21/24 at 09:45 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was asked how much assistance did resident #40 need to ambulate. The DON stated that resident #40 was a 1 assist for ambulation, meaning they needed one staff assistance to ambulate. The DON was asked if resident #40 had a history of self transferring and the DON said yes resident #40 does self transfer. The DON stated that up until the time of the fall with fracture on 7/30/23 the resident had been successful with self transfers from the bed to the chair. DON stated that at times resident #40 would attempt to ambulate but staff would get to resident #40 before they got into the hallway. On 03/21/24 at 09:55 AM, an interview was attempted resident #40, resident #40 could not recall the fall that occurred on 07/30/23 that resulted in a fracture. Resident #40 is currently on hospice and declining. Residents #40's BIMS is currently 6 indicating severe impairment and BIMS at the time of the fall was 10 indicating moderate impairment. On 03/21/24 at 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with the director of therapy, The therapy director was asked what the residents ambulation and transfer status at the time of discharge from therapy. The therapy director stated that when resident #40 was on therapy they were a standby/supervision for ambulation and supervision/touching assistance for transfers from bed to chair/chair to bed. On 4/26/23 resident #40 was discharged from therapy and she was standby/supervision assist for ambulation with a walker and supervision with transfers. On 03/21/24 record review of Physical Therapy discharge notes for resident #40 revealed that they were supervision/touching assistance for transfers from bed to chair and chair to bed. Discharge notes also revealed that resident #40 is a supervision/touching assistance for ambulation. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure adequate supervision for fall prevention and management for three residents (Resident #18, Resident #36, and Resident #40) of eight residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of implementation of meaningful interventions to prevent falls, Resident #36 and Resident #40 experiencing multiple falls including falls with fracture, emergency medical treatment, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for decline in overall health. Findings include: Resident #18: On 3/19/24 at 11:10 AM, Resident #18 was observed sitting in their room in a Broda chair (wheeled, reclining chair with head rests and elevating solid leg rests used for positioning). A Hoyer (mechanical lift) sling was under them, and their call light was not within reach. The Resident was noted to have upper and lower extremity contractures. An interview was completed at this time. When queried if they had fallen in the facility, Resident #18 indicated they had but did not provide further details. When asked when they fell, Resident #18 smiled but not provide a verbal response. On 3/20/24 at 2:01 PM, Resident #18 was observed in their room. The Resident was in bed, positioned on their back with their eyes closed. The left side of the Resident's bed was against the wall and a wedge style cushion was in place under the fitted sheet. Review of the CMS-802 Form indicated Resident #18 had not fallen at the facility. Record review revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Central Pontine Myelinolysis (CPM- neurological disorder which causes destruction of the substance which protects nerve fibers), heart disease, Tourette's disorder, bipolar disorder, pain, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had impaired mobility in both upper and lower extremities, and was dependent upon staff to complete all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) including turning and repositioning. The MDS revealed the Resident had no falls. Review of Resident #18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, The resident is high risk for falls r/t (related to) debility (Initiated: 6/5/23). The care plan included the interventions: - Ensure bed brakes are locked (Initiated: 12/14/23) - Anticipate and meet the resident's needs (Initiated: 6/5/23) - Follow facility fall protocol (Initiated: 12/14/23) A second care plan entitled, The resident has had an actual fall . (Initiated: 8/2/23) was noted and included the following intervention, Date and description of other interventions put in place after a fall: 8/1/23: Neuros per protocol, low bed, mats on floor while in bed; 2/28/24: Bed rotated as resident prefers to roll onto R. side (Initiated: 8/2/23) The care plan entitled, The resident has an alteration in musculoskeletal status r/t BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremity) and BUE (Bilateral Upper Extremity) contractures (Initiated: 11/20/23) included the intervention, Anticipate and meet needs. Be sure call light is within reach and respond promptly to all requests for assistance (Initiated: 11/20/23). Review of Resident #18's EMR revealed the Resident was assessed to be a high risk for falls on 6/5/23, 8/1/23, 11/1/23, 2/9/24, and 2/28/24. Progress note documentation detailed: - 8/1/23 at 9:30 PM: Post-Fall Evaluation . New pain post fall: Yes . Resident stated . 'right side of face hurt' . New Interventions . Bed in lowest position, mat placed by bed, square wedge cushion placed under sheet to prevent resident from rolling out again . Additional Comments: Asked Hospice if resident could get an increase in liquid morphine . related to at times, resident lifts head and bangs it down on bed and keeps repeating until body gets closer and closer to the edge of the bed . - 8/1/23 at 11:30 PM: Health Status Note .nurse heard resident yell 'help, help, I'm on the floor!' . entered room and observed resident on the floor lying next to the bed, face was turned on the right side facing the bathroom, right arm was outstretched behind them partly under the bed, and left arm was underneath chest. This nurse called for CNA, who was down the hallway, to get the Hoyer lift (mechanical lift which uses a sling to transfer individuals). Res. was assisted back into bed by Hoyer lift and assess for injury . Res. denied pain other than to the right side of face which was laying on and was slightly red . Intervention is to have bed in lowest position, have mat next to bed, and square wedge cushion is to be placed under sheet to prevent res. from rolling out of bed . - 2/28/24 at 12:50 AM: Post-Fall Evaluation . New Intervention . A new wedge system to keep resident from rolling out of bed . - 2/28/24 at 1:17 AM: Fall . nurse heard a 'help me, help me' down short-A hall, then hurried to resident's room and observed resident lying in prone position on the mat with face/head turned towards the door. Bed in was in lowest position. This nurse asked res. what happened, and res. stated 'I fell out of bed, help me up, hurry, get me up!' Res. was turned over onto back so CAN's (Certified Nursing Assistants) could assist into bed . Review of facility provided Incident and Accident (I and A) reports for Resident #18 revealed the following: - 8/1/23 at 9:30 PM: Un-Witnessed (Fall) . nurse heard resident yell 'help, help, I'm on the floor!' Upon entering room . observed resident lying on the floor on stomach, next to bed with right arm in back of them slightly under the bed, left arm was under chest and face was turned to the right side towards the bathroom door, laying on their right cheek . resident was lifted back into bed by Hoyer and assessed for injuries . Right side of resident's face/cheek was slightly red where they were laying on it . Bed placed in lowest position. Mat placed next to bed. Square wedge cushion placed under sheet to prevent resident from rolling out of bed . No injuries observed at time of incident . Predisposing Situation Factors Restless/Agitation . Other Info: Resident kept lifting head off bed and letting it fall back on bed and kept repeating this last night . - 2/28/24 at 12:50 AM: Fall . Resident's Room . nurse heard resident yell 'help me, help me' . to resident's room to note resident lying on the floor mat next to bed in a prone position while laying on the right side of face with head turned toward the door Residents arms and hands were under abdomen. The wedge cushion used under the bed sheet to prevent resident from rolling out of bed was on the floor half under bed. The light was off. The blanket and sheet were on the floor partly wrapped up in resident's legs. Resident yell 'get me off of this floor, hurry up, get me up!' . Immediate Action Taken . Bed rotated as resident prefers to roll onto right side, preventing rolling out of bed . Predisposing Physiological Factors . Incontinent . None . Predisposing Situation Factors . Restless/Agitation . None . Pain . An interview and review of Resident #18's falls was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/25/24 at 11:07 AM. When queried regarding the Resident's fall on 8/1/23, the DON indicated the Resident fell out of their bed. The DON then stated that as fall mat was implemented as the intervention following the fall. When queried why the wedge indicated in the post fall interventions and observed under the Resident's fitted bed sheet was not included in the active care plan, an explanation was not provided. The post fall evaluation documentation specifying Hospice was contacted to request additional pain medication (morphine) as the Resident had been lifting and banging their head down the bed and moving themselves closer to the edge of the bed the night prior to the fall and the night they fell. The DON stated, That's fair when asked where documentation was located showing indicating the Resident was having pain, what non-pharmacological interventions were attempted, and why the concern was not addressed when first identified on 7/31/23 prior to the Resident falling. When queried if additional supervision/monitoring was implemented, the DON indicated there was not. No further explanation was provided. When queried if they had additional investigation documentation pertaining to the Resident's fall on 2/28/24, the DON provided statements from two CAN's. Review of the statements revealed the Resident had last been seen by staff at 10:00/10:15 PM and was found on the floor at 12:50 AM. When queried how often staff should visually observe as well as turn and reposition dependent Residents, the DON replied every two hours. The DON was then asked why it had been over two hours since the Resident was seen by staff, per the statements, the DON did not provide an explanation. Resident #36: On 3/19/24 at 11:43 AM, Resident #36 was observed in the hallway of the facility. The Resident was propelling themselves in their wheelchair towards the exit door at the end of the hallway. There were no footrests in place on the Resident's wheelchair. Resident #36 was pleasantly confused and did not provide meaningful responses to questions when asked. At 12:00 PM on 3/19/24, Resident #36 was not present in their room. An observation of their room revealed the Resident had a raised edge mattress in place. On 3/20/24 at 11:00 AM, Resident #36 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the activity room of the facility. The Resident's wheelchair did not have footrests in place. The Resident was pleasantly confused and did not provide meaningful responses to questions when asked. Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction (stroke), weakness, and repeated falls. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required maximum to total assistance to complete all ADL's with the exception of eating. The MDS further revealed the Resident had impaired Range of Motion (ROM) in one upper extremity and had one fall with no injury since the prior MDS assessment completion. Review of Resident #36's EMR revealed a care plan entitled, The resident has had an actual fall. The care plan included the interventions: - 2/2/23- fall-assist res. into a stationary chair when in the activity room; 4/18/23- post fall med review, therapy referral; 6/30/23 - Encourage to keep wheelchair at bedside and to place gripper socks on while in bed, PT eval, med review; 7/12/23 - apply gripper strips to side of bed, post-fall med review; 7/30/23 - offer to take to rest room twice during the night, encourage to keep gripper socks on while in bed; 8/11/23 - 1 assist with transfers in activity room; 9/25/23 - Commode with side rails to be placed above toilet. Neuros completed. X-ray's; 10/7/23 - Medication review, encourage call light use, toilet with evening first rounds; 10/14/23 - Toilet twice nightly and put a night light in room; 11/23/23- mat at bedside; 2/7/24: Resident to be visualized by staff when OOB (Out of Bed). Seated in common areas (Initiated: 7/30/23) - Continue interventions on the at-risk plan (2/17/23) - Encourage resident to be in commons area when awake and up to wheelchair to aid in the prevention of falls (Initiated: 10/9/23) - Mat next to bed to aid in the prevention of injury should resident attempt to self-transfer from bed (Initiated: 11/23/23) - Resident to be one of the first residents up in the morning and taken commons area (Initiated: 11/23/23) - When staff is not at nurse station take resident to activities (Initiated: 2/7/24) A second care plan entitled, (Resident #36) is at risk for falls r/t (related to) instability, shuffling gait, medication use, dementia, lack of coordination, repeated falls, impaired mobility, and poor safety awareness (Initiated: 7/12/23). The care plan included the interventions: - Ensure bed brakes are locked (Initiated: 7/7/22) - Anticipate and meet needs (Initiated: 7/7/22) - Commode to be place over resident's toilet to aid in the prevention of falls (Initiated: 9/26/23) - Encourage resident to make sure has good grip shoes on or grippy socks (Initiated: 4/18/23) - Grip strips next to bed (Initiated: 7/12/23) - Review information on falls and attempt to determine cause of falls. Record possible root causes. Alter and/or remove any potential causes if possible. Educate family/caregivers/IDT as to causes (Initiated: 4/18/23) Resident #36 had another care plan entitled, (Resident #36) had limited physical mobility r/t disease processes (Initiated: 7/7/22). The care plan included the intervention, Uses Wheelchair (ensure foot pedals are in place) (Initiated: 10/19/23). On 3/21/24, Resident #36 was observed sitting the hallway of the facility, across from the nurses' station in their wheelchair in the same place and position at 8:30 AM and 10:36 AM. The Resident's wheelchair was noted to have bilateral footrests in place at this time. Review of facility provided I and A reports revealed no additional investigation documentation and/or witness statements for any fall other than the fall on 10/14/23. Any additional documentation related to the Resident #36's falls was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). Review of provided I and A and EMR documentation revealed Resident #36 had 11 falls from 6/30/23. Review of the falls revealed the following: - 6/30/23 at 4:15 AM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their room/bathroom. Per the Fall note dated 6/30/23 at 4:47 AM, Staff responded to resident's bathroom call light and observed resident lying on the floor of bathroom . resident lying on right side with head under the handrail and feet out of the doorway . pain to right hip . was heading to urinate prior to falling. Encouraging resident to keep walker at bedside for use with all ambulation and will encourage use of gripper socks while in bed for safer nighttime transfers. Predisposing factors listed on the I and A form included poor lighting, transferring without assistance, and improper footwear. The intervention, Encourage to keep wheelchair at bedside and to place gripper socks on while in bed . was added to Resident #36's care plan on 6/30/23. - 7/11/23 at 3:15 PM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their room. The Fall note dated 7/11/23 at 3:15 PM revealed, Resident was sitting on buttocks and was leaning on left arm for support in doorway facing toward the hallway . legs were extended in front of them into the hallway . walker was next to them . Regular socks on with no shoes on . Review of I and A documentation revealed predisposing factors included impaired memory and improper footwear. The intervention, Apply gripper strips to side of bed was added to the care plan on 7/12/23. - 7/30/23 at 1:36 AM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their bathroom. Per witness statements, CAN's U heard someone calling out while checking on other residents and observed (Resident #36) sitting on the floor behind the door at approximately 1:45 AM. The Incident Note dated 7/30/23 at 1:54 AM detailed, (Resident #36) had the door open enough to see they were sitting on the floor. The note revealed staff were unable to open the door enough to enter the room and had to have the Resident slide back from the door. After entering the room, Resident #36 was observed sitting at an 85-degree angle with back toward the bed and with their legs straight out. The Resident had no pants on and was wearing regular socks. An IDT Note dated 8/2/23 at 3:38 PM detailed, IDT reviewed fall .fall likely r/t room change. prior care planned interventions were not transferred to new room. Maintenance to apply gripper strips in new room. The care plan intervention added following the fall was offer to take to rest room twice during the night, encourage to keep gripper socks on while in bed. - 8/11/23 at 10:30 AM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in the Activity Room. Per Health Status Note, the Resident was observed sitting on floor next to the table in the activity room . facing towards the hall, legs were outstretched in front of them. Rolling chair behind (Resident) . had attempted to sit on the chair, the chair rolled back, and res fell to the floor, landing on buttocks . did c/o (complain of) left hip pain while on floor, however once Hoyered (mechanical lift) up and placed in chair res denied any pain . The intervention implemented on the Post-Fall Evaluation was Resident education not to use chairs that roll. The I and A dated 8/1/23 at 11:31 AM indicated the Predisposing factors included incontinence, poor vision, weakness, ambulating without assist, and seating. Upon request for additional investigation documentation related to the fall from the DON, staff statements were provided. The statements revealed the fall was unwitnessed. Per Activity Staff T's statement, they saw Resident #36 on the floor when they sat down after gathering residents and assisting with beverages. The intervention, 1 assist with transfers in activity room was added to the care plan. - 9/25/23 at 11:40 PM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their bathroom. The Incident Note dated 9/26/23 at 3:30 AM detailed, Nurse was called into resident's room last night at 2340 (11:40 PM). Res. observed sitting on bathroom floor with legs outstretched in front of them next to the toilet . leaning against the door frame . The floor was wet around res., who was wearing just a blouse and low-cut regular socks. Res. did not have a pull-up on . The Resident did not use any assistive devices to transfer to the bathroom. The I and A specified the Resident's left lower leg and buttocks hurt with bending and raising the leg and the immediate actions included, Mat placed next to bed and Walker moved away from bed. Predisposing factors were listed as poor lighting, wet floor incontinent, and had improper footwear. The intervention, Commode to be place over resident's toilet was added to the Resident's care plan on 9/26/23. - 10/7/23 at 11:23 AM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their room. Per I and A form dated, 10/7/23 at 11:23 AM, Resident #36 fell in their room while trying to get up from bed to go to the bathroom and there were no witnesses. Predisposing factors listed included poor lighting, incontinence, and transferring independently. There were no nurses notes in the EMR related to the fall and no interventions were implemented. - 10/7/23 at 9:45 PM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their room. Per documentation, facility staff were notified by another resident that Resident #3 was on the floor. Resident #36 was on the floor halfway out of their room door on their left side on the floor. Their walker was lying on the floor, and they did not have appropriate footwear in place. The Resident had left sided rib pain following the fall. An IDT note dated 10/10/23 at 3:29 PM revealed the intervention implemented following the fall was, resident to be toileted first round by CAN's (Certified Nursing Assistants) on night shift and education on call light use. - 10/14/23 at 1:30 AM: Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom which resulting in a comminuted (severe break in which the bone splits into three or more pieces) displaced open fracture of the left thumb and distal phalanges (long bones in fingers) which required sutures and laceration of the right wrist which necessitated sutures. Resident #36's SBAR-Fall documentation dated 10/14/23 at 1:30 AM revealed the Resident's pain level was eight out of 10 (10 being the worst imaginable pain) at 4:08 AM on 10/14/23 (note: Resident #36 was not in the facility at 4:08 AM). The Resident's pain was in their right side of chest (ribs) . left hip . laceration site, right hand-palm - stated, 'I think I broke my back' on initial observation, but unable to pinpoint then stated pain to left side, .thumb laceration . The Resident's injuries were documented as Right hand -palm- Laceration . Left thumb deep laceration with abnormal traction of thumb. The Health Status Note dated 10/14/23 at 2:15 AM detailed, Another res. heard a thud and this resident yell for help, then called for the CAN's . nurse entered room and noted res. sitting on the floor of the bathroom with the left side of face leaning against the plastic waste basket. Res. was bleeding moderately and complaining that hands hurt. This nurse noted a bad laceration on the dorsal side of right hand, with a skin flap bent back revealing muscle. Area cleaned gently and dressed with a nonstick Telfa pad and Kerlix wrapped around hand to stop the bleeding. Resident's left thumb was bent at an angle and also cut with part of muscle hanging out. Area cleaned gently and dressed with a nonstick Telfa pad and Kerlix wrapped around hand to stop the bleeding . EMS arrived at 0200 (AM) . The I and A form dated 10/14/23 at 1:30 AM specified, Resident's left thumb was bent backward at an unusual angle and was moderately bleeding with muscle hanging out. There was blood on resident's shirt, arms, and legs, besides all over the floor. Resident was not wearing gripper socks .Immediate Action Taken: Resident cleaned up . Right hand laceration was cleaned and dressed . Left thumb was cleaned and dressed . Notes: Resident has a laceration around left thumb with muscle hanging out, which was angled backward in an unusual position . also had a recent fall this month, was educated to call for assistance when having to use the bathroom; however, resident has dementia and forgets to call for help . Predisposing factors listed included poor lighting and balance, confused, gait imbalance, and improper footwear. Review of left-hand X-ray, dated 10/14/23 at 3:32 AM from the hospital revealed, Findings . There is a comminuted fracture of the mid and distal first proximal phalanx that is angulated dorsally and radially. There is also comminuted and displaced fracture at the base of the first distal phalanx . Comminuted and displaced fractures of the left first proximal and distal phalanges. A Health Status Note dated 10/14/23 at 10:20 AM detailed, Resident returned from (hospital at) approximately 0730 AM. via EMS. Resident alert with confusion. Left hand with open displaced fx (fracture) to L thumb requiring some sutures. Resident with thumb splint in place with Kerlix. Residents L thumbnail with some bleeding noted at nail. Dressing in place. R (right) hand laceration with 4 sutures and steri strips in place. Resident looking at hands and asked, 'what happened'. Resident does not remember having fall. Resident with facial grimacing . - 10/16/23 at 12:21 PM: IDT Note . IDT members met to discuss fall. Root cause determined to be confusion and need to toilet. Immediate interventions to send to ED to eval and treat. Resident to be toileted twice nightly by staff and assist to bathroom. The Resident's care plan was updated to include the intervention, Toilet twice nightly and put a night light in room following the fall on 10/14/23. Review of facility-provided Verification of Investigation Form signed by the DON on 10/18/23 detailed, Resident said they were trying to go to the bathroom and slipped and fell . was complaining of left thumb pain and right hand. Resident typically requires 1 assist and uses a wheelchair for assistance. All care plan interventions at the time of the fall were in place and being used . History: Resident has poor situational and safety awareness due to dementia . Summary . Due to resident's inability to comprehend declines . tried to ambulate to bathroom independently. Resident did not use call light and did not turn on bathroom light. Resident fell d/t poor lighting and inappropriate safety awareness. - 10/17/23: A Fall (post) progress note dated 10/17/23 at 11:39 AM was present in Resident #26's EMR. The note specified, Res observed sitting on floor next to the table in the activity room. Res was facing towards the hall, legs were outstretched in front of them. Rolling chair behind . Res had attempted to sit on the chair, the chair rolled back, and res fell to the floor, landing on buttocks. An IDT Note dated 10/17/23 at 11:40 AM detailed, IDT met to discuss resident fall. Root cause determined to be resident independently transferring, and unsafe seating d/t wheeled chair. Interventions to be 1 assist with all transfers while in activities, and resident is not to sit on wheeled furniture . Note: An I an A form for a fall on 10/17/23 was not provided. - 11/23/23 at 10:42 AM: Per SBAR- Fall documentation in the EMR, Resident #36 had an unwitnessed fall in their room at 6:58 AM and facility staff were notified by the Resident's roommate that they were on the floor. Resident #36 was found sitting on buttocks between w/c (wheelchair) and bed facing door. Resident #36 informed staff they were attempting to go to the bathroom without assistance. The Post Fall Evaluation form for this fall detailed there was a noted pattern to falls in which falls occur in resident's room or restroom. The intervention imp[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedure to ensure neglect was reporte...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedure to ensure neglect was reported to the State Agency for one resident (Resident #216) of one resident reviewed, resulting in the lack of reporting of Resident #216 being pulled from the facility wheelchair van with the platform lift down and suffering multiple injuries including a cervical spinal fracture and the likelihood for additional unreported incidents of neglect and lack of thorough investigation. Findings include: Resident #216: On 6/7/23 at approximately 4:30 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN's) G was transporting three facility residents, including Resident #216, back to the facility from off site appointments in the facility wheelchair van. Upon returning to the facility, CAN's G unloaded two residents in wheelchairs from the van and Staff V assisted by taking the residents back to their respective units of the facility. Upon returning to the van to unload Resident #216 in their wheelchair, CAN's G did not check the platform lift position and entered the side door of the van. CAN's G proceeded to unhook Resident #216's wheelchair and walk backwards, towards the lift exit door at the back of the van. CAN's G walked off the back of the van, with the platform lowered, pulling Resident #216 in their wheelchair to the concrete pavement with momentum from movement. The distance from the floor of the van to the ground was measured to be 28-inches. Record review revealed Resident #216 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact, required substantial to maximum assistance for transfers, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Per the face sheet, Resident #216 was discharged to another nursing home on 6/1/23. A review of documentation in Resident #216's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: - 6/7/23 at 4:48 PM: SNF to ED Handoff Form . Resident fell off lift from wheelchair van in chair approx. 2 feet . Reason(s) for transfer: Laceration to left great toe, difficulty turning neck, pain in both shoulders and arms . - 6/7/23 at 5:25 PM: Post-Fall Evaluation . Post Fall Follow-up . Is there new pain post fall? Yes . Pain Scale is at: 9 . generalized and severe pain neck, head and shoulders . Injury . Yes . Abrasion . Bruise . Cut . Laceration . multiple abrasions and bruising with laceration see SBAR for completer description . Pain . New . increase due to fall . Pain prior to fall controlled with medication Resident sent to ER for treatment and evaluation . resident c/o (complain) of pain with bilateral arm movements and turning head to right . - 6/7/23 at 6:43 PM: Health Status Note . Resident sent out to hospital at 1640 (4:40 PM) due to fall from transport van, multiple bruises, and abrasions, laceration to right great toe. C/o of shoulder pain both shoulders, bump to back of head and c/o of difficulty turning head to right. - 6/7/23 at 7:03 PM: Resident was being removed from van when both resident and transporter fell to pavement. - 6/13/23 at 7:07 PM: SBAR - Fall . Brief description . Transport was returning resident to facility when both resident and transporter fell out of back of van to pavement . Any injury noted? Yes . Location . Vertebrae (upper-mid) Bruising mid back spine . Right hand (back) abrasion with bruising thumb and knuckles . Left hand (back) abrasion index finger, knuckles, thumb with bruising . Right buttock large bruise . Left buttock bruise . Left knee (front) bruising . Right lower leg (front) bruising inner right shin . Back of head hematoma c/o (complain of) of difficulty turning head to right . Right toe(s) abrasions . Right toe(s) great toe with approx. 2-inch laceration . Left toe(s) abrasions . Right shoulder (rear) Right shoulder bruising with pain . Left shoulder (rear) bruising with pain . hematoma to left upper arm near shoulder painful to touch . left rib bruising . right rib bruising . Type of injury . Swelling . Bruising . Laceration . Hematoma . Decreased Mobility/ROM (Range of Motion) . Pain . Yes . Pain elicited by . Passive ROM . general pain all over severe pain in shoulders, neck and head . Send to ER . An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/21/24 at 8:43 AM. When queried regarding facility investigation completion, the DON revealed the Administrator had completed the investigation. When asked if the incident was reported to the State Agency, the DON replied, No. When queried why it was not reported, the DON relayed the incident was not abuse and therefore did not need to be reported. Review of Resident #216's hospital documentation revealed the following: - 6/7/23 at 5:39 PM: ED Provider Notes . Review of Systems . Musculoskeletal: Positive for back pain and neck pain. Skin: Positive for wound . Laceration to right great toe, multiple abrasions to hands and feet . Positive for headaches . C-Collar has been applied. Does have pain with palpation. There is ecchymosis and point tenderness noted approximate T1 (First Thoracic Spine Vertebra) . Comments . There are multiple abrasions noted to the dorsal surface of toes and fingers. There is a laceration noted to the dorsal surface of great toe that will require repair . Patient has history of dementia and is a poor historian . alert to person and place . does recall the fall . Laceration Repair . Laceration details: Location . R big toe. Length (cm): 3 . Depth (mm): 3 . Repair method: Sutures . Medical Decision Making: Patient has been seen and evaluated in the emergency department for a fall . out of a van from the floor level onto the ground . did sustain a C2 (Second Cervical Spinal Vertebra) fracture . also has multiple abrasions noted to hands and feet . right great toe laceration requiring repair . I did speak with the radiologist regarding CT (Computed Tomography scan) of the C-spine as has had previous neck fracture in the past. This is a new fracture when compared to most recent CT. I did speak with (Specialist Physician) at (Tertiary hospital) and the patient will be transferred as a trauma for further evaluation and treatment . - 6/7/23 at 5:49 PM: ED Triage Notes (Nursing) . Patient fell at (facility). Ems states patient fell forward out of wheelchair onto a staff member. Patient did hit head . L arm pain, laceration to R foot and part of L great toenail removed in fall . - 6/7/23, Resulted 10:35 PM: CT cervical spine without contrast (trauma age >65) . There is a new tip of C2 spinous process fracture with 3 mm of distraction of the tip fragments . Final Result . 1. New tip of C2 spinous process fracture . - 6/7/23, Resulted 10:24 PM: CT head without contrast .Head trauma, moderate-severe . There is a right posterolateral frontal scalp hematoma . Final Result . Right lateral scalp hematoma . Review of facility policy/procedure entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property (Effective Date: 11/28/17) revealed, Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees . to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress . Reporting . It is the policy of this facility that . abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment . are reported immediately . if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess an indwelling urinary catheter u...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess an indwelling urinary catheter upon admission for one resident (Resident #322) of one resident sampled for indwelling catheters. Findings include: Resident #322: On 03/19/24 at 11:00 AM record review revealed that resident #322 is [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified open wound, right lower leg, atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes, hyperlipidemia and morbid obesity due to excess calories. On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of admission to the facility from the hospital. On 03/20/24 at 10:30 AM, record review revealed no care plan or order for the indwelling catheter. No diagnosis was present in the health record for the catheter as well. On 03/20/24 at 03:40 PM, record review of the 5 day MDS, dated [DATE], section H noted that the resident does not have an indwelling catheter. On 03/20/24 at 03:40 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator was interviewed about why section H is coded as the resident not having an indwelling catheter. The MDS coordinator acknowledged that resident #322 has an indwelling catheter, but the indwelling catheter was not marked on the 802 and not coded correctly in section H of the MDS. On 03/21/24 at 09:55 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about indwelling catheters and asked if a resident should have an order and a care plan for an indwelling catheter. The DON stated that yes they should have an order and care plan. The DON stated that their should also be a task for CAN's to provide catheter care. On 03/21/24 at 10:00 AM, review of the Urinary Indwelling Catheter Management Guideline effective 11.28.17 stated: a medically justified indwelling catheter will require physician order for: catheter size and type.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of adm...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of admission from the hospital. The indwelling catheter was observed draining urine, the collection bag was covered, off the floor and below the resident. A leg strap was in place to anchor the catheter. On 03/20/24 at 03:30 PM, record review of the CMS 802 was conducted and revealed that resident #322 was not coded for having an indwelling catheter. On 03/20/24 at 03:40 PM, record review of the 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], section H was coded that the resident does not have an indwelling catheter. On 03/20/24 at 03:40 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, was interviewed about why resident #322 was not coded on the CMS 802 for having an indwelling catheter and why section H of the 5 day MDS dated [DATE] was not coded as having an indwelling catheter. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that resident #322 has an indwelling catheter but it was not marked on the CMS 802 and not coded correctly in section H of the MDS. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that accurate resident information was completed on the Resident Roster Matrix (802) for two residents (Resident #46, Resident #322), resulting in the inaccurate assessment of the residents with a likelihood for unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Registered Nurse (RN) MDS/Care Plan Coordinator' job description (undated) revealed the MDS/Care plan coordinator is to coordinate the development and implementation of all resident plans of care in accordance with state & federal regulations and facility policies . Upon entrance conference on 3/19/2024 the team leader was notified of Covid-positive resident with the facility. Observation on 3/19/2024 of the surveyor's self-tour of the D-wing unit revealed that there were transmission-based precaution caddies out in the hallway in front of various room. Record review on 3/19/2024 at 10:33 AM the team leader received a copy of the Resident Roster Matrix (802) form revealed that there were no transmission-based precautions residents identified or were there any Covid positive resident identified. Record review and observation on 03/19/24 at 11:33 AM the surveyor Record review of CMS 802 reviewed- Resident #46 was residing in Rm#64 at the time of the survey. Observation during the initial tour of the west end unit of the facility revealed that on the D-wing room [ROOM NUMBER] was a transmission-based precautions room. Observations of various resident rooms identified personal protective equipment caddies or three drawer plastic bins outside of rooms and signage posted on doorways. In an interview and record review on 03/20/24 at 03:39 PM with the Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set assessment nurse G, the state surveyor inquired about the Tuesday 3/19/2024 CMS 802 form and Resident #46's COVID positive and transmission-based precautions (TBP) that were not included in the Resident Roster Matrix form. The RN/MDS G stated that those both should have been included on the Resident roster Matrix CMS 802, and on the MDS assessment form, record review of assessment. RN/MDS G stated that she was aware of the Covid positive in the building, and that the Resident Roster Matrix was a team effort and was missed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #322) of one resident sampled for baseline indwelling catheter care plans. Findings include: Resident #322: On 03/19/24 at 11:00 AM record review revealed that resident #322 is [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified open wound, right lower leg, atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes, hyperlipidemia and morbid obesity due to excess calories. On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of admission to the facility from the hospital. On 03/20/24 at 10:30 AM, record review revealed no care plan or order for the indwelling catheter. No diagnosis was present in the health record for the catheter as well. On 03/21/24 at 09:55 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about indwelling catheters and asked if a resident should have an order and a care plan for an indwelling catheter. The DON stated that yes they should have an order and care plan. On 03/21/24 at 10:00 AM, review of the Urinary Indwelling Catheter Management Guideline effective 11.28.17 under the section Additional Care Practices Should Include: Developing a plan of care upon admission and/or placement that includes: A review quarterly, annually and with a change in condition, causal and/or contributing factors, associated risks including infections, goals including trial removals if indicated, individualized interventions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop respite care plans for one resident (Resident #65,), resulting in the likelihood for the resident's psychosocial and c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop respite care plans for one resident (Resident #65,), resulting in the likelihood for the resident's psychosocial and care needs to be unmet. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Registered Nurse (RN) MDS/Care Plan Coordinator' job description (undated) revealed the MDS/Care plan coordinator is to coordinate the development and implementation of all resident plans of care in accordance with state & federal regulations and facility policies . Duties/Responsibilities: Calculate triggers and develop resident assessment protocol for initiation of care plans . Resident #65: Record review of Resident #65's closed medical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with admission date of 12/18/2023 for hospice/respite care. Record review of the MDS discharge form dated 12/23/2024. Record review of Resident #65's care plans pages 1-17, revealed that there was no hospice/respite care plan noted. In an interview on 03/21/24 at 10:13 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that Resident #65 was admitted for a 5-day respite care and then discharged home with wife on hospice. The DON stated that there should have been a respite care plan. In an interview and record review on 03/21/24 at 12:36 PM with Corporate Clinical Nurse P reviewed Resident #65's care plans all pages 1-17 reviewed all 17 pages of the care plan from the closed medical record. Resident #65 was a Respite stay with no hospice/respite care plan noted in the medical record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Record review revealed that resident #40 is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], currently on hospice, has a brief...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #40: Record review revealed that resident #40 is [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE], currently on hospice, has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a 6 indicating severe impairment. Resident #40 has diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gait abnormalities, lack of coordination, repeated falls, unsteady on feet, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. On 03/20/24 at 12:53 PM, record review was conducted of fall reports, they revealed that resident #40 sustained falls on 4/19/23, 7/10/23, 7/12/23, 7/28/23, 7/30/23, 8/9/23, 8/14/23, 11/17/23 and 3/4/24. Fall sustained on 4/19/23, resident was in the therapy room using Front wheeled walker, turned and their right leg gave out and they fell on their right side. Care plan interventions included: medication review and a therapy screen. Fall sustained on 7/10/23 resident #40 observed on the floor in their room, they had self transferred, the fall was unwitnessed. Care plan interventions included a medication review and to use call light. BIMS was 10 indicating moderate impairment. Fall sustained on 7/12/23 unwitnessed fall in the room, resident #40 observed on the floor on their left side about two feet from the entrance door, spilled water was observed on the floor. Fall report indicated that Resident #40 stated they had been reaching for water, slid out of bed and scooted over to the door. Care plan interventions included: offer to take resident to the bathroom two times a night. Fall sustained on 7/28/23 at 4:45 PM resident #40 was observed on the floor in the bathroom, stated they hit their head on the trash can. Care plan interventions included: post fall med review, take to the restroom after meals, grippy socks. Fall sustained on 7/30/23 resident #40 was observed lying on their right side, head under the sink, legs bent at the knees, feet towards the bed. Resident #40 stated they hit the right side of their head, unsure of what they hit it on. Resident #40 complained of sharp pain with any movement of their right arm. Resident sustained a right clavicle fracture. Family was notified of the fall, physician was notified and resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Care plan interventions: education on using call light to ask for assistance. BIMS 10, indicating moderate impairment. Fall sustained on 8/9/23 resident #40's roommate called the certified nursing assistant (CAN's) to the room, resident #40 was observed on the floor mat next to their bed, fall report indicated that resident #40 stated they tried to get out of bed to go to the bathroom. No injury. The fall was unwitnessed. Care plan interventions included: perform a medication review. Fall sustained on 11/17/23 fall report indicated that resident #40's anti-roll back brakes failed on the wheelchair during self transfer and resulted in a fall. Care plan interventions included repair the anti-roll back brakes. An interview was conducted with the DON about the care plan interventions for resident #40's falls, the DON was asked if those are appropriate interventions post fall, the DON stated that the therapy screen for an intervention was not appropriate since the resident was already on therapy. The DON was asked if the repeated use of a medication review as a care plan intervention was appropriate to prevent falls. The DON stated that in some cases it was appropriate, but not always. The DON was asked if the intervention of offering the restroom to resident #40 two times a night was appropriate after the resident sustained a fall reaching for her water near the bedside to get a drink. The DON stated that no, that intervention was not appropriate. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update or revise care plans with appropriate interventions for two residents (Resident #28, Resident #40), resulting in the likelihood for resident care needs being missed, prolonged illness or injury, recurrent falls and falls with major injury. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Registered Nurse (RN) MDS/Care Plan Coordinator' job description (undated) revealed the MDS/Care plan coordinator is to coordinate the development and implementation of all resident plans of care in accordance with state & federal regulations and facility policies . Duties/Responsibilities: Calculate triggers and develop resident assessment protocol for initiation of care plans . Resident #28: Observation of Resident #28 during the initial tour of the west unit of the facility revealed Resident #28 to be seated up in a wheelchair with a blue disposable brief on and the resident was attempting to also put on a white elastic pull-up style brief. The Resident stated that he has to pee all the time. Observation of Resident #28 revealed contractures of the Director of Nursing was in the hallway and notified of the resident's needs. Record review of Resident #28's nursing progress notes dated 3/17/2024 at 10:46 AM noted that direct care staff concerned about resident not acting like himself today. He stated that he did not care what they brought him to eat. Sleepy and sitting in his wheelchair with a blanket wrapped around him. he voiced that he felt achy. Has not touched his breakfast or touched his coffee which is unusual for him. Record review of Resident #28's nursing progress notes dated 3/17/2024 at 11:10 AM noted that Resident #28 was found on the floor by staff. The physician was notified of the fall and a urinary sample was ordered. Record review on 03/20/24 at 10:46 AM of Resident #28's physician orders revealed that on 3/20/2024 Resident #28 Started Levaquin 500mg (antibiotic) for Urinary tract infection. Record review of Resident #28's care plans pages 1-23, revealed that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was impaired by contractures of the right knee and right hand. Toileting required assist with toileting care and peri care and changing of clothes if soiled. Resident #28 was care planned for bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility initiated 10/24/2023, there were only two interventions related to bladder incontinence: (1.) Skin- provide skin care with each incontinence episode. (2.) Clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. There was no care plan for the addition of urinary tract infection with the treatment of antibiotics and signs and symptoms of adverse reactions to antibiotic medication.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0660 (Tag F0660)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the resident's responsible party sign Against Medical Advice (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the resident's responsible party sign Against Medical Advice (AMA) discharge paperwork for one resident (Resident #63), resulting in a cognitively-impaired resident discharging from the facility. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'admission Packet' undated revealed Section D: Transfer or Discharge, (2.) In the event that the resident and/or resident representative request discharge of the resident against the advice of the attending physician, resident and/or resident representative (in his/her representative capacity) hereby expressly release the facility, its offices, employees, and agents from any and all liability . Resident #63: Record review of Resident #63's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed that the resident sustained a fall at home resulting in left maxillary and left orbital facial fractures, left arm fracture of the radius and ulna. The discharge summary noted the resident to experience delusions, intermittent confusion, and agitation. An interview and record review on 03/21/24 at 10:30 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding Resident #63's cognitive abilities revealed the Minimum Data Set scored a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS') score of 5 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #63's electronic medical record revealed discharged AMA (against Medical Advice) form dated 1/19/2024 was only signed by the cognitively impaired resident, and not the responsible party. The DON stated that the resident came from a hospital after a fall at home with fractured arm, facial bruising. A family member wanted the resident to come here but realized that she did not want to be here. Record review of the facility AMA form, dated 12/19/2023, revealed that the Resident #63, who is cognitively impaired, signed herself out. The Responsible party signature line was left unsigned. Record review of progress notes noted that the resident was picked up by the son. Responsible party signature was not obtained. In an interview on 03/21/24 at 11:16 AM, Social Services Designee H stated that the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is a brief mental cognition test for cognitive ability. BIMS' score indicates the severity impairment level 13-15 cognitively intact, 8-12 moderately impaired, 0-7 severely impaired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment and implement a Restorativ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment and implement a Restorative Nursing program for one resident (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of accurate assessment and documentation of Range of Motion (ROM), a lack of implementation of Restorative Nursing services for a resident with a known contracture, further decline in ROM, and the likelihood for functional decline and avoidable pain. Findings include: Resident #7: On 3/19/24 at 11:31 AM, Resident #7 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in their room. An interview was completed at this time. When queried how much assistance they require for transferring and bathing, Resident #7 revealed they were unable to stand. When asked the reason, Resident #7 indicated they were unable to really move their legs and stated they also had a lot of pain from an infection in their spine. When queried if they were receiving therapy and/or Restorative Nursing Services for Range of Motion (ROM), Resident #7 verbalized they had in the past but were not now. The Resident specified they would like to receive some sort of therapy but were told they couldn't because of insurance. With further inquiry, Resident #7 revealed their joints were becoming stiffer since not receiving therapy. Record review revealed Resident #7 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included functional quadriplegia (upper and lower extremity immobility due to severe disability or frailty without injury to the brain or spinal cord), right ankle contracture, paralytic syndrome, and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact, had impaired Range of Motion (ROM) in both lower extremities, and was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the exception of eating. The MDS further revealed the Resident had not received any therapy and/or Restorative Nursing services. Review of Resident #7's MDS assessment dated [DATE] detailed the Resident had impaired ROM in both upper and lower extremities and the MDS dated [DATE] specified the Resident had no functional ROM limitations. Review of Resident #7's care plans in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, The resident has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) quadriplegia (Initiated: 8/13/23). The care plan included the following interventions: - Uses Wheelchair (ensure foot pedals are in place) (Initiated: 8/13/23) - Podus Boot (firm boot frequently used for individuals with foot drop contractures)- staff to apply boot q (every) day and leave on for no more than 6 hrs. at a time. May remove for comfort (Initiated: 10/6/23) The Resident did not have an active and/or discontinued care plan in place related to Therapy, Restorative Nursing, and/or ROM activities. Review of Resident #7's task documentation in the EMR revealed no documentation of passive and/or active ROM activity completion. A review of progress note documentation in Resident #7's EMR revealed the following: - 2/6/24 at 8:37 AM: Nursing Evaluation . Quarterly . Musculoskeletal: No ROM impairment to upper extremities. ROM impairment to LE (Lower Extremities). The resident needs assistance with ADL's. Resident uses . Wheelchair . - 1/23/24 at 2:49 PM: Physician/PA/NP - Progress Note . Musculoskeletal/ Extremities . Limited Range of Motion Upper Left: Limited ROM able to minimally flex elbow. Limited Range of Motion Upper Right: Limited ROM able to minimally flex elbow. Limited Range of Motion Lower Left: Passive ROM. Limited Range of Motion Lower Right: Passive ROM . Abnormal Gait: Non-ambulatory . Upper Extremity Weakness: Paralysis with minimal movement of elbows. Lower Extremity Weakness: Paralysis . - 1/4/24 at 2:37 PM: Physician/PA/NP - Progress Note . Musculoskeletal/ Extremities . Limited Range of Motion Upper Left: Limited ROM; Active; able to minimally flex elbow. Limited Range of Motion Upper Right: Limited ROM; Active; able to minimally flex elbow. Limited Range of Motion Lower Left: Limited ROM; Passive. Limited Range of Motion Lower Right: Limited ROM; Passive Encouraged to get up out of bed daily Encouraged to participate in passive ROM exercises daily as tolerated. Consider therapy consult with worsening pain or function Continue with current pain management regimen . - 9/24/23 at 6:08 PM: Physician/PA/NP - Progress Note . Follow-up . regarding quadriplegia and need for Podus boot . has a plantarflexion contracture of the ankle with dorsiflexion . Contracture is interfering or is expected to interfere significantly with patient's ability to function normally. Therapy program in place which includes active stretching of involved muscles and tendons carried out by professional staff at skilled nursing facility. Patient is lacking in 20 degrees of dorsiflexion. Plantarflexion contracture limits the patient's ability to stand . - 7/20/23 at :07 PM: Health Status Note . admitted to the facility . has a diagnosis of paraplegia but can move upper extremities and left lower extremity. Does not have good control of hands as has no sensation to them . A review of Resident #7's Health Care Provider orders was completed. The Resident did not have an order for Restorative Nursing Services and/or active/passive ROM. The orders further revealed the most recent order for physical therapy was on 10/26/23. A list of Residents who were currently receiving Restorative Nursing services was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/21/24 at 8:38 AM. Review of provided list revealed Resident #7 was not receiving Restorative. An interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/25/24 at 10:06 AM. When queried why Resident #7 was not receiving Restorative Nursing Services, the DON stated, Not on Restorative because no change in baseline. When queried regarding the facility policy/procedure for Restorative Nursing, the DON revealed Residents are referred to Restorative after discharge from therapy for a designated amount of time. The DON was then asked if the Resident was at risk for decline in ROM and further contracture development due to their medical conditions and confirmed they were. When queried why Restorative was not being provided to prevent decline and further contracture development, the DON stated, Restorative means restore and reiterated the Resident was at their baseline. When queried regarding the inconsistencies in MDS documentation of the Residents functional limitations in ROM, the DON revealed they were unaware of variations in ROM on MDS assessments. Resident #7's MDS assessment documentation was reviewed with the DON at this time. When queried how the Resident went from bilateral upper and lower extremity ROM impairment (8/3/23) to no ROM impairment (11/6/23) to bilateral lower extremity impairment in February 2024 when there was documentation of a right ankle contracture upon admission, the DON was unable to provide an explanation. Resident #7's most recent therapy documentation with ROM measurements was requested at this time. On 3/25/24 at 11:00 AM, an interview and review of Resident #7's therapy documentation was completed with the DON and Occupational Therapist (OT) F. The therapy discharge documentation recommended ROM activities for the Resident but did not provide current ROM measurements for comparison. When queried if it was possible to obtain current ROM measurements for Resident #7, OT F stated they would obtain the measurements and inform this Surveyor. A follow up interview was completed with OT F and the DON on 3/25/24 at 11:25 AM. OT F relayed they had seen Resident #7 and obtained ROM measurements. When asked, OT F stated the Resident had impaired ROM in their bilateral lower extremities. When queried regarding the Resident's current ROM compared to most recent therapy discharge documentation, OT F stated there was a decline in the Resident's ROM. OT F was asked what was specifically worse and revealed the Resident's right upper extremity had declined as well as in their right hand. OT F stated the Resident was not able to make a fist with their right hand when they had been able to previously. OT F exited the room at this time and the DON acknowledged Resident #7 had a decline in ROM. When asked why the Resident had not been receiving Restorative Nursing to prevent the decline in ROM, the DON did not provide further explanation. Review of facility policy/procedure entitled Restorative Nursing Guideline (Effective: 10/1/19) revealed, Purpose . A resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to include range of motion and / or to prevent further decrease in range of motion . Assessment for Mobility . Based upon the comprehensive assessment, the resident's care plan must include specific interventions, exercises and/or therapy to maintain or improve the ROM and mobility, or to prevent, to the extent possible, declines or further declines in the resident's ROM or mobility. The resident/representative must be included in the development of the restorative/rehabilitative care plan and provided the risks and benefits of the treatments . Care plan interventions may be delivered through the facility's restorative program, or as ordered by the attending practitioner, through specialized rehabilitative services .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Resident #322: On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of admission to the facility (03/15/24) from the hospital. The...

Read full inspector narrative →
Resident #322: On 03/19/24 at 02:24 PM, resident #322 stated they had an indwelling catheter at their request and they had it on the day of admission to the facility (03/15/24) from the hospital. The indwelling catheter was observed draining urine, the collection bag was covered, off the floor and below the resident. A leg strap was in place to anchor the catheter. On 03/19/24 at 02:32 PM, record review revealed no care plan, order or justifiable diagnosis for the indwelling catheter. Record review also did not reveal an assessment of the indwelling catheter or progress notes indicating the potential removal of the indwelling catheter had been discussed. On 03/20/24 at 10:30 AM, record review revealed no care plan, order or justifiable diagnosis for the indwelling catheter. Record review also did not reveal an assessment of the indwelling catheter or progress notes indicating the potential removal of the indwelling catheter had been discussed. On 03/21/24 at 09:16 AM, record review revealed no care plan, order or justifiable diagnosis for the indwelling catheter. Record review also did not reveal an assessment of the indwelling catheter or progress notes indicating the potential removal of the indwelling catheter had been discussed. On 03/21/24 at 09:59 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about indwelling catheters and if they should have a diagnosis for use and be removed as soon as possible if clinically indicated. The DON stated that yes they should have a diagnosis and be reviewed for the earliest removal possible. On 03/21/24 at 10:00 AM, record review of the Urinary Indwelling Catheter Management Guideline states under Additional Care Practices Should Include: attempting to remove the catheter as soon as possible when no indications exist for justification of placement. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and maintain an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident (Resident #322) and prevent facility-acquired urinary tract infections for two residents (Resident#28, Resident #51, resulting in an indwelling catheter being left in place with no justifiable diagnosis. Findings include: Record review of the 'Nursing 2023 Urinary Tract Infections in Long-term Care, Improving the outcomes through evidence-based practice' Nursing 2023, Volume 53, Number 10, revealed Urinary tract infections (UTI's) are the most common infections in long-term care (LTC) facilities, yet clinical judgement rather than evidence is most often used in evaluation and treatment. Resident #28: Observation of Resident #28 during the initial tour of the west unit of the facility revealed Resident #28 to be seated up in a wheelchair with a blue disposable brief on and the resident was attempting to also put on a white elastic pull-up style brief. The Resident stated that he has to pee all the time. Observation of Resident #28 revealed contractures of the Director of Nursing was in the hallway and notified of the resident's needs. Record review of Resident #28's nursing progress notes dated 3/17/2024 at 10:46 AM noted that direct care staff concerned about resident not acting like himself today. He stated that he did not care what they brought him to eat. Sleepy and sitting in his wheelchair with a blanket wrapped around him. he voiced that he felt achy. Has not touched his breakfast or touched his coffee which is unusual for him. Record review of Resident #28's nursing progress notes dated 3/17/2024 at 11:10 AM noted that Resident #28 was found on the floor by staff. The physician was notified of the fall and a urinary sample was ordered. Record review on 03/20/24 at 10:46 AM of Resident #28's physician orders revealed that on 3/20/2024 Resident #28 Started Levaquin 500mg (antibiotic) for Urinary tract infection. Resident #51: Record review of Resident #51's progress note dated 3/13/2024 at 1:05 PM revealed that the resident complained of when he urinates, he feels he cannot empty his bladder. Record review of Resident #51's progress note dated 3/13/2024 at 6:51 PM revealed that the resident was noted with groin pain beginning 2-3 days ago accompanied with urinary frequency, Resident complained of lower abdominal pain worsening. Urinary analysis was ordered on 3/13/24 per progress note. Record review of Resident #51's urinalysis laboratory report revealed collection date of 3/15/2024 at 4:48 AM. Record review on 03/19/24 at 02:16 PM of Resident #51's progress notes dated 3/19/2023 revealed that the resident was placed on Levaquin 500mg oral for 7 days for Urinary Tract Infection. In an interview on 03/20/24 at 02:35 PM with the Director of Nursing regarding the occurrence of urinary tract infections on the west end unit on the E- hallway It was a facility acquired UTI, and we are treating it.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure info...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure informed consent for non-psychotropic medications used to treat mood and behavior disorders for one resident (Resident #10) of one resident reviewed for Depakote (anticonvulsant medication frequently used as a mood stabilizer), resulting in lack of consent for use and the potential for unnecessary and undesired medication use. Findings include: Resident #10: Record review revealed Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one-sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke), paranoid schizophrenia, and mood disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired, displayed no behaviors, and was dependent upon staff to complete all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the exception of eating. Review of Resident #10's Electronic Health Record revealed the Resident was currently receiving the following psychoactive medications: - Abilify 20 milligram (mg) daily (antipsychotic medication) - Duloxetine HCL Delayed Release Sprinkle 30 mg daily (antidepression and antianxiety medication) - Ativan 1 mg three times a day (antianxiety medication) - Depakote Sprinkles Delayed Release Sprinkle 250 mg (Divalproex Sodium) three times a day for behaviors. An interview and record review was completed with Social Services Director H on 3/25/24 at 9:14 AM. When queried regarding facility policy/procedure related to informed consent for psychotropic medications, Director H revealed a signed consent is obtained from the Resident and/or responsible party for each medication. When queried regarding consents for Resident #10's psychotropic medications, Director H provided signed consent forms for Ability, Duloxetine, and Ativan. Director H was queried regarding a consent for the Resident's Depakote and stated, We don't do consents for that. When asked if the medication was being used a psychotropic medication for behavior, Director H confirmed it was. Director H was then asked why a consent would be obtained, like all other psychotropic medications, when it was being used for that reason and stated, I can see that. That makes sense. The Director of Nursing (DON) entered the room at this time and was informed Resident #10 was receiving Depakote for behaviors but did not have a consent. The DON verbalized they understood and indicated the medication should have a consent. Director H revealed they had never obtained consents for off label medications when used for psychotropic purposes including Depakote but would obtain the consent. No further explanation was provided. A policy/procedure related to psychotropic medication use was requested at this time but not received by the conclusion of the survey.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for medication labeling...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for medication labeling and medication storage in 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed, resulting in opened and undated multi-dose medications, and the likelihood for altered medication efficiency. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Medication Storage in the Facility' policy, dated 4/2018, revealed: When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. (1.) The nurse shall place a date open sticker on the medication and enter the date opened and the new date of expiration (note: the best stickers to affix contain both an open date and expiration notation line). The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days unless the manufacture recommends another date or regulations/guidelines require different dating. Observation and review on 03/20/24 at 07:06 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K of the [NAME] C Hall medication cart revealed Resident #8 had ipratropium/albuterol nebulizers, 0.5mg/3ml plastic 29 ampoules located in an open foil packet of 30 ampoules, there was no open date noted on the foil packet. Observed Amantadine Hydrochloride 50mg/5mL multi-dose bottle that was opened and had no open date noted for an unsampled resident. LPN K also reviewed the multi-dose bottle and found no open date. Observation on 03/20/24 at 07:29 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) I, while on the A-B short hall, revealed two loose tablets: one blue oval, and a white round with numbers 121 on back side, where noted to be loose in the bottom of the second drawer of the medication cart. Observation of an Advair discus that was used unsampled resident residing in room #B27. RN I reviewed the box and the Advair Discus for an open date on the multi-dose inhalation device, none was found. The unsampled resident in room B#27 also had fluticasone propionate nasal spray device that came from hospital not dated, still in the drawer. RN I stated that the facility usually send them home with family. Observation on 03/20/24 at 07:32 AM with RN I of unsampled resident residing in room B#26 had foil packets of Budesonide nebulizer suspension of 0.5mg/2ml ampoule 5 pack with 2 left in pack, no open date noted. RN I reviewed the foil packet for an open date, and none was found. Observation on 03/20/24 at 07:52 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) J on the Long A-hall revealed Resident #3's ipratropium/albuterol nebulizer foil pack opened with 23 ampoules out 30 remained in the foil package. There was no open date noted on the foil packet of multi-dose ampoules. Observation of unsampled resident residing in A-hall room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed ipratropium/albuterol nebulizer foil pack opened with 28 ampoules out of 30 no open date noted. RN J reviewed both foil packets for open dates and none was found.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection, documentation, and analysis resulting in a lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis and the likelihood for spread of microorganisms and illness to all 62 facility residents. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 3/19/24 at 10:09 AM, the facility Administrator disclosed the facility currently had one resident who was Covid-19 positive. An interview and review of facility infection control program and data was completed on 3/21/24 at 12:57 PM with Infection Control Registered Nurse (RN) E and the Director of Nursing (DON). When queried regarding Covid-19 infection within the building, RN E confirmed the facility currently had one positive (Resident #46). When queried regarding the process/procedure related to outbreak reporting and communication with the health department, RN E stated, (The Administrator) reported to the health department. When queried regarding documentation of proof of reporting/communication of Covid outbreak, RN E stated they did not maintain documentation of health department notification of the reportable disease outbreak. RN E was then queried regarding process surveillance for Infection Control (IC) and indicated they did not understand the question. When asked if they were completing audits and what they were auditing, RN E provided a hand washing observation form detailing a single observation of hand washing for one staff member for January and March 2024. When asked if they had any additional audits for the past 12 months, RN E provided Standard Precautions Observations of Hand Hygiene Provision of Supplies audit form the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) which addressed functionality and accessibility of hand hygiene/washing supplies and the environment surrounding the sink for: - January 2024 - C Hall - February 2024- E Hall - March 2024- room [ROOM NUMBER] - December 2023 - October 2023 - September 2023 When queried if they had completed any additional IC audits/rounding in the past year, RN E stated they had not. When queried if they conducted random hand hygiene audits, RN E replied, No. RN E revealed they asked a staff member to wash their hands for the provided hand washing audit. When queried if they completed audits/surveillance in the kitchen and laundry, RN E stated they did not. When asked why, RN E indicated they were very busy with other tasks as they were also the Unit Manager, and that each department was responsible for their area. RN E was asked if they thought they may identify different concerns pertaining to IC that an individual who is not a nurse, RN E replied, Yes. RN E verbalized they had not been actively involved in ancillary departments and indicated they were unaware that needed to be incorporated into the IC program. The January 2024 infection control data was reviewed at this time. The Monthly Infection Control Log (Line List) only included residents who were receiving antibiotic therapy. When queried how they identified potential infections and communicable diseases to prevent spread, RN E gestured toward the provided line list and responded the infection control information they tracked was included on the line list. RN E was then asked how they track residents who are ill but do not receive antibiotics and stated, I don't. When queried if they track residents who are receiving anti-fungal medications, RN E replied, No. I was told I don't have to. When asked how they identify potential infections to mitigate and prevent spread if they do not identify residents with signs and symptoms of infection, RN E verbalized understanding but did not provide further explanation. When queried if fungal infections are able to be transmitted from person to person, RN E confirmed they could. RN E was asked how they are able to identify potential trends of fungal infections when they are not tracking signs/symptoms and treatment and was unable to provide an explanation. The line listing did not include signs/symptoms of infection for any resident. No carry-over infections were included on the January 2024 line listing. When queried regarding carry-over infections from December 2023, RN E did not respond. RN E was asked how they monitor and track infections from the previous month who are still potentially infectious and/or receiving antimicrobial treatment and revealed they do not track carry over infections from prior months. When asked if a resident who became ill at the end of the previous month has the potential to spread infection to other residents, RN E confirmed they could. When queried regarding the signs/symptoms of infection for the residents listed who were receiving antibiotic treatment, RN E indicated they were able to look up the information in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) if needed. Resident #37 was included on the line list as having a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Per the line list, Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the infection Date of Onset was 1/24/24. A urinalysis (UA) was obtained on 1/24/24 which showed no infection. Resident #37 received Keflex (antibiotic) from 1/24/24 to 2/1/24 and did not meet criteria for treatment. When queried why Resident #37 received Keflex for a UTI when diagnostic testing showed they did not have a UTI, RN E stated, (Resident #37) went to the ER on [DATE] and came back on it. When asked why the antibiotic was not discontinued, RN E revealed the Physician wanted them to continue the antibiotic and had completed a Risk vs. Benefit for the medication. When asked to see the Risk vs. Benefit, RN E provided a typed document that the Physician had signed. The dates on the document did not correlate with the antibiotic and information on the line list. When asked about the dates on the Risk vs Benefit, RN E stated, I must have made a mistake when I typed it. RN E was asked what they meant and revealed they typed the word document, and the Physician signed it. The line listing for March 2024 was then reviewed. Resident #35 was listed as having a skin infection and was receiving antibiotic therapy for MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus- antibiotic resistant bacterial infection which started on 3/11/24 and resolved on 3/21/24. The line listing detailed the Resident was on contact isolation precautions. When queried if the information on the line listing meant the Resident was supposed to have contact transmission-based isolation precautions in place from 3/11/24 to 3/21/24, RN E confirmed. When asked why the Resident did not have transmission-based isolation precautions in place at any time during survey, RN E was unable to provide an explanation. The line listings for both January and March 2024 had multiple lines with two antibiotics listed on the same line for individual residents. When asked if both antibiotics for each resident were started on the same date for the same infection for each resident, RN E revealed they would need to review each resident's medical record. No further explanation was provided. A brief review of facility provided infection control policies and procedures revealed not all policies included a yearly review date. When queried regarding their role in infection control policy/procedure review, RN E revealed they are not involved in reviewing and/or revising infection control policies/procedures. When asked who is responsible, RN E indicated policies/procedures are reviewed/revised by corporate staff. Review of facility provided policy/procedure entitled, Infection Prevention and Control Guideline (Effective: 11/28/17) revealed, It is the practice To prevent, recognize and control the onset and spread of infection. Prevention and Control Program included a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating and controlling infections and communicable diseases . a. Surveillance System of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable disease of infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively maintain food service equipment effecting 63 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively maintain food service equipment effecting 63 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 03/19/24 at 10:30 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Director of Nutritional Services A. The following items were noted: Walk-In Freezer: The walk-in freezer entrance door perimeter was observed with ice damns. The wall surface, adjacent to the entrance door, was also observed with sporadic ice dam pockets. Director of Nutritional Services A indicated she would contact maintenance for necessary repairs as soon as possible. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 4-601.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris. Two of two Garland oven doors were observed loose-to-mount, creating a small gap between the unit face and door back. The gap measured approximately 1-2 inches wide. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 4-501.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and adjusted in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. (C) Cutting or piercing parts of can openers shall be kept sharp to minimize the creation of metal fragments that can contaminate FOOD when the container is opened. The hand sink faucet cold water valve assembly was observed leaking water upon actuation of the hot water valve assembly. The hand sink basin was also observed located adjacent to the mechanical dish machine. Director of Nutritional Services A indicated she would contact maintenance for necessary repairs as soon as possible. The Main Dining Room Kitchenette hand sink basin was observed draining very slowly. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 5-205.15 states: A PLUMBING SYSTEM shall be: (A) Repaired according to LAW; and (B) Maintained in good repair. On 03/19/24 at 11:35 A.M., An interview was conducted with Director of Nutritional Services A regarding the facility maintenance work order system. Director of Nutritional Services A stated: We have the TELS program. On 03/21/24 at 08:45 A.M., Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Preventative Maintenance (TELS) and Inspections dated (no date) revealed under (I) Policy Guidelines: It is the policy of (facility name) that in order to provide a safe environment for residents, employees, and visitors, a preventative maintenance program (TELS) has been implemented to promote the maintenance of equipment in a state of good repair and condition. Routine inspections promote safety throughout the facility and aid in keeping equipment in good working order and operating in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines. Regular inspection, testing, and replacement or repair of equipment and operational systems contribute to preservation of the facility's assets. Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Preventative Maintenance (TELS) and Inspections dated (no date) further revealed under (III) Procedural Components: (D) Work Orders and Service Requests: (1) A system for electronic work orders is established in TELS among all staff, and maintenance personnel that provides rapid communication regarding equipment problems. (2) The system includes documentation of: (a) The problem; (b) Date the problem was identified; (c) Who was assigned; and (d) Location of the problem. On 03/21/24 at 09:00 A.M., Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Quik Reference Tool: Clean and Sanitary dated (no date) revealed under Standard: All food preparation areas, food service areas, and dining areas will be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Quik Reference Tool: Clean and Sanitary dated (no date) further revealed under Guideline: (1) The Dining Services Director will ensure that the kitchen is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, including floors, walls, ceilings, lighting, and ventilation. On 03/21/24 at 09:15 A.M., Record review of the Direct Supply TELS Work Orders for the last 60 days revealed no specific entries related to the aforementioned maintenance concerns.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant affecting 63 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant affecting 63 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, decreased illumination, and reduced air-quality. Findings include: On 03/20/24 at 11:30 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Maintenance Services Director C and Environmental Services Director D. The following items were noted: Entrance Foyer: Two acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture leak. The two sets of facility entrance double-doors were observed missing the weather stripping between the door slab surfaces. The primary set of entrance double-doors were also observed with air gaps between the door slab and door jamb. The air gaps measured approximately 0.25 - 0.75 inches-wide on the right-side door, viewed from the parking lot. The right-side door was additionally observed to not completely close, due to hinge concerns. Maintenance Services Director C indicated he would contact corporate to outsource necessary repairs for the entrance double-door sets. Entrance Lobby: Restroom (right side): Two acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture leak. The overhead light assembly was also observed non-functional. Main Dining Room: Two large return-air-ventilation grills were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The soiled ventilation grills measured approximately 2-feet-wide by 3-feet-long respectively. Environmental Services Director D indicated he would have staff thoroughly clean the soiled ventilation grills as soon as possible. Activity Room: The popcorn machine was observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. East Unit Kitchenette: Nine 12-inch-wide by 12-inch-long vinyl tiles were observed (etched, scored, cracked, particulate, missing). Maintenance Services Director C indicated he would have staff replace the faulty vinyl tiles as soon as possible. Nursing Station: 1 of 3 chair armrests were observed (etched, scored, particulate), creating an increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Nursing Station Restroom: Three acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture exposure. Soiled Utility Room: Five acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture exposure. Alcove: One acoustical ceiling tile was observed stained from a previous moisture exposure. Tub Room: The oscillating floor fan was observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. Environmental Services Director D indicated he would have staff thoroughly clean and sanitize the soiled floor fan as soon as possible. West Unit D-Hall Linen Closet: The perimeter wall/floor vinyl coving strip was observed missing. The missing coving strip measured approximately 14-feet-long. Maintenance Services Director C indicated he would have staff install the missing vinyl coving strip as soon as possible. Nursing Supply Room: Four acoustical ceiling tiles were observed stained from a previous moisture leak. Nursing Station Restroom: One acoustical ceiling tile was observed stained from a previous moisture leak. The hand sink basin was observed loose-to-mount, creating a gap between the wall and sink basin. The gap measured approximately 0.25 - 1.0 inches-wide. On 03/20/24 at 01:15 P.M., An interview was conducted with Maintenance Services Director C regarding the facility maintenance work order system. Maintenance Services Director C stated: We have the TELS system. On 03/20/24 at 02:00 P.M., An environmental tour of sampled resident rooms was conducted with Maintenance Services Director C and Environmental Services Director D. The following items were noted: 2: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 3: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 4: The Bed 1 overbed upper 48-inch-long fluorescent light bulb was observed non-functional. The casement window screen was also observed loose-to-mount. The casement window frame was further observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were additionally observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 7: The Bed 2 desk fan was observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 11: The Bed 1 overbed light assembly switch was observed non-functional. The pull string extension was also observed missing. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 14: The casement window screen was observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The casement window frame was also observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 18: The Bed 2 desk fan was observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The casement window screen was also observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The casement window frame was additionally observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 28: The Bed 2 overbed light assembly lower 48-inch-long fluorescent bulb was observed non-functional. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 30: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 46: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 47: The casement window screen was observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The casement window frame was also observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 51: The restroom overhead light assembly plastic lens cover interior was observed soiled with multiple dead insect carcasses. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were also observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 59: The casement window screen was observed with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The casement window frame was also observed with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were further observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 63: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 66: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 67: The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. 69: The Bed 1 sconce light was observed non-functional. The restroom return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were also observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. Note: The return-air-ventilation interior baffles and plenum were observed heavily soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits throughout the entire facility. On 03/20/24 at 04:35 P.M., Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Preventative Maintenance (TELS) and Inspections dated (no date) revealed under (I) Policy Guidelines: It is the policy of (facility name) that in order to provide a safe environment for residents, employees, and visitors, a preventative maintenance program (TELS) has been implemented to promote the maintenance of equipment in a state of good repair and condition. Routine inspections promote safety throughout the facility and aid in keeping equipment in good working order and operating in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines. Regular inspection, testing, and replacement or repair of equipment and operational systems contribute to preservation of the facility's assets. Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Preventative Maintenance (TELS) and Inspections dated (no date) further revealed under (III) Procedural Components: (D) Work Orders and Service Requests: (1) A system for electronic work orders is established in TELS among all staff, and maintenance personnel that provides rapid communication regarding equipment problems. (2) The system includes documentation of: (a) The problem; (b) Date the problem was identified; (c) Who was assigned; and (d) Location of the problem. On 03/21/24 at 09:15 A.M., Record review of the Direct Supply TELS Work Orders for the last 60 days revealed no specific entries related to the aforementioned maintenance concerns. On 03/21/24 at 09:30 A.M., Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Deep Clean Procedures dated (no date) revealed under Procedures: (5) Clean restroom by moving in a clockwise rotation from the restroom door: (b) Vents - use high duster to clean vent(s); (c) Light cover - dust and disinfect. On 03/21/24 at 09:45 A.M., Record review of the Policy/Procedure entitled: Daily Cleaning Procedures (DCP) dated (no date) revealed under Procedures: (7) Clean Restroom: (c) High dust - lights, vents.
Mar 2023 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents' dignity by not answering call lights in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents' dignity by not answering call lights in a timely manner for 3 residents (Resident #11, Resident #36, and Resident #107), of a total of 16 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in incontinence, shame and embarrassment, with the likelihood for isolation and decreased socialization. Findings Include: Resident #11: Review of the face Sheet, Minimum Data Set, MDS dated [DATE], physician orders and care plans dated 10/22 through 2/23, revealed Resident #11 was 92 years-old, alert, dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included, Chronic heart and lung disease, emphysema, muscle wasting, spinal stenosis, and anxiety. Review of the MDS dated 9/22, revealed Resident #11 was interviewable. Observation was done on 3/9/23 at 10:25 a.m., of Resident #11 sitting in her wheelchair in her room. The residents call light was clipped to the bed blanket near the wall; the resident was sitting approximately 4 feet from the call light. When this surveyor asked the resident if she could reach her call light, she attempted and was unable. Resident #11 stated, The light (call light) is not for the nurse's convenience, I need it, I can't reach it, I almost wet my pants. Resident # 36: Review of the Face Sheet, MDS dated [DATE], physician orders and care plans dated 8/21/21 to 2/23, revealed resident #36 was 77 years-old, alert, dependent on staff for all ADL's and admitted to the facility on 11/18. The resident's diagnosis included, bile duct cancer, diabetes, chronic heart and lung disease, hepatic failure, aneurysm of aorta, anemia, dysphagia (swallowing deficit), diverticulosis of intestine, heart failure, splenomegaly, depression, and anxiety. Review of the MDS dared 2/23, revealed Resident #36 was interviewable. During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 10:30 a.m., resident #36 stated It takes them (staff members) about an hour (to answer his call light), they (facility) are short sometimes, it makes me up-set. Resident #107: Review of the Face Sheet, MDS dated [DATE], and care plans dated 2/9/23 to 2/13/23, revealed Resident #107 was [AGE] years old, alert, and able to make his own healthcare decisions, dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic heart and lung disease, diabetes, hearts disease, sepsis (infection), and acute respiratory failure. During an interview done on 3/9/23 at 10:51 a.m., Resident #107 said staff did not answer his call light and it caused him to be incontinent in his bed. The resident was very embarrassed when he told this to the surveyor and stated, It makes me feel left alone. During an interview done on 3/9/23 at 10:51 a.m., Residents Family Member D stated, They (staff) don't answer call lights and he pooped his (Resident #107) pants because of it. During an interview done on 3/9/23 at 1:24 p.m., Nursing Assistant/CNA A stated it should take 3 minutes to answer a call light. During an interview done on 3/9/23 at approximately 1:40 p.m., the Administrator said an acceptable time to answer a resident call light was less than 10 minutes. When this surveyor requested call light audits and call light time records, the Administrator said they did not have any available. Review of the facility Resident Rights-Guidelines dated 2017, reported Call light in reach for room and bathroom and the correct type for resident use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans with resident changes, to ensure that interventions necessary for care and appropriate care services were pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans with resident changes, to ensure that interventions necessary for care and appropriate care services were provided for two residents (Resident #14 and Resident #45) of 16 sampled residents, reviewed for care plans, resulting in the likelihood for unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Care plan Standard Guideline' policy dated 11/28/2017, revealed the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment . Review and revise by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments . Resident #14: Observation on 03/08/23 at 9:19 AM Of Resident #14's room revealed that the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device hose was open to the air noted lying in cookie crumbs on the bedside nightstand. The CPAP mask was laying on nightstand on brown paper towel with cookie crumbs noted under the mask. The mask is dry and not stored in a bag. Observed distilled water noted in in room, gallon jug on floor. Record review of Resident #14's Impaired gas exchange, need for continuous monitoring related to diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea), noted interventions add on 3/8/2023 to: Apply CPAP mask at bedtime, Wash water tub, air tubing and mask headgear in warm H2O (water), using mild detergent, rinse and air dry out of direct sun light. Both interventions were added after the state surveyor began to ask questions about the CPAP. The state surveyor noted that Oxygen therapy care plan date 3/8/2023 had added interventions also put in place. Resident #45: In an interview and observation on 03/08/23 at 10:40 AM with Resident #45 revealed the resident was seated up in wheelchair in room. Resident #45 stated that she had heart failure, and had to go the hospital to much fluid, then came back to facility. Resident #45 stated that she got pneumonia and had to go back to the hospital. Resident #45 stated that she does have diabetes and thyroid issues. Record review of Resident #45's physician orders dated 2/28/2023 noted: Levothyroxine sodium 75 mcq oral daily at 6:00 am. Nursing 2017 Drug Handbook, pages 875-878, revealed levothyroxine sodium thyroid hormone replacement therapy has adverse reactions and needs monitoring. Record review on 03/10/23 at 02:20 PM of Resident #45's care plans, pages 1-24, had no mention of thyroid disease or thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Review of care plans in place had no interventions for thyroid therapy adverse reactions or monitoring.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #35: On 3/09/23, at 9:36 AM, Resident #35 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #35's daughter was a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #35: On 3/09/23, at 9:36 AM, Resident #35 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #35's daughter was at bedside and offered that they had to give their mom her shower last Saturday because the shower aide doesn't come in a lot. Resident #35's daughter explained that they took their mom to the shower room, gave her a shower and that the social worker said it was ok. On 3/09/23, at 10:53 AM, a record review of Resident #35's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Osteoarthritis and Stroke. Resident #35 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and had severely impaired cognition. A review of the Focus ADL's -Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (relate to) dementia Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 care plan revealed . Interventions Bathing: Assist with shower/bathing on scheduled shower days 2 x (times) week and PRN (as needed), Provide nail care and hair care as needed. May use shower chair Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 . A review of the [NAME] revealed Bathing: Assist with shower/bathing on scheduled shower days 2 x week and PRN. Provide nail care and hair care as needed. May use shower chair . A review of the Task: Bathing (shower WED & SAT AM) Look Back: 30 (days) revealed the resident only received four showers in the last 30 days on the following days: 2/11/2023 2/22/2023 3/1/2023 3/4/2023 Resident #48: On 3/08/23, at 10:30 AM, Resident #48 was ambulating in the hallway. Resident #48 was wearing a red plaid button jacket type flannel and green and blue pajama bottoms. On 3/09/23, at 9:00 AM, a record review of Resident #48's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Personal history of other diseases of the nervous system and sense organs, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Diabetes Mellitus and Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Resident #48 required assistance with ADL's. According to the most recent Minimum Data set Assessment BIMS (brief mini mental score) of 4 the resident had severely impaired cognition. Focus The resident has actual / potential for an ADL self-care performance deficit Date Initiated: 02/13/2023 Goal The resident will demonstrate the appropriate use of adaptive device (s) to increase ability through the review date. Date Initiated: 10/04/2022 Target Date: 04/05/2023 Interventions -Bathing: (specify) Date Initiated: 10/04/2022 Encourage resident to use bell to call for assistance. Date Initiated: 10/04/2022 Monitor/document/report PRN any changes, and potential for improvement, reasons for self-care deficit, expected course, declines in function. Date Initiated: 10/04/2022 A review of [NAME] revealed SAFETY Date and description of other interventions put in place after a fall: 2/18/23 - offer toileting q (every) 2 hours while awake 2/22/23 - Offer toileting to resident two times through night when resident is sleeping and stay with the resident while he is in the bathroom at night Ask resident if he needs to use the bathroom every two hours while awake . Bathing -Bathing: (specify) . There was no personalized description as to how the residents ambulates, bathing assistance, or that he may wear the same clothes. A review of the Task: Bathing (specify type & schedule) TUE & FRI AM look Back: 30 (days) . revealed the resident went ten days between showers. The document revealed the following showers: . 2/25/2023 3/7/2023 On 3/09/2023, at 10:00 AM, Resident #48 was observed in the hallway with the same clothing on from the day before. The resident had 2 ball caps on their head. The resident was asked how their day was going and the resident was non-verbal. An activity staff member passed by and stated, he has days where he doesn't say anything. A review of the facility provided Quality of Life Purpose: Quality of life is fundamental principle that applies to all care and services provided to facility residents. Each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Responsible Party: All staff . Quality of Life - Sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. This includes a basic sense of satisfaction with oneself, the environment, the care received, the accomplishments of desired goals and control over one's life . Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for four residents (Resident #14, Resident #25, Resident #35, and Resident #48), out of 16 residents reviewed, resulting in showers not being given, observations of residents appearing unkept, not getting showers, wearing the same clothing for days and the likelihood of decreased mood. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Quality of Life' policy dated 5/2020, revealed that the purpose: Quality of Life is a fundamental principle that applies to all care and services provided to facility residents. Each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being . Quality of Life- Sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. This includes a basic sense of satisfaction with oneself, the environment, the care received, and accomplishments of desired goals and control over one's life. Record review of facility provided shower/bathing schedule undated, revealed that residents were scheduled two days a week for showers/baths. Both Resident #14 and #25 were scheduled for Mondays and Fridays each week. Resident #14: In an observation and interview on 03/08/23 10:17 AM with Resident #14 revealed that he loves music for his nerves, it calms him down. Resident #14 appears disheveled and hair greasy appearing. Record review of Resident #14 medical record revealed an elderly male resident with medical diagnosis of: Respiratory failure, morbid obesity, heart failure, cardiac disease and hallucinations . Record review of Resident #14's Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) care plan dated 7/9/2021, intervention of Bathing/Showering: Resident requires extensive assistance by one staff with bathing/showering per schedule and as necessary. There were no interventions about resident refusals. Observation and interview on 03/9/23 at 9:35 AM during resident council meeting revealed that Resident #14 attended the resident council meeting, was unkept in appearance, hair greasy dirty, Record review of facility provided bathing/shower schedule revealed Resident #14 was scheduled for baths/showers on Mondays and Fridays in the afternoon. Record review of Resident #14's electronic shower task tab, shower assistance tab and shower set-up tab; 30 days look back dated 2/26/23 and 3/8/2023 revealed only two documented entries. On 2/26/23 documentation noted a refusal and on 3/8/2023 at 4:29 PM a shower was given by staff. Resident #25: Observation on 03/08/23 at 02:43 PM of Resident #25 self-ambulated the hallways, appeared unkept in appearance. Record review of facility provided bathing/shower schedule revealed Resident #25 was scheduled for baths/showers on Mondays and Fridays in the mornings. Record review of Resident #25 shower task electronic shower task tab, shower assistance tab and shower set-up tab; 30 days look back dated 2/11/23 and 3/8/2023 revealed only four documented entries. On 2/11/23 documentation noted a refusal, and a shower was given on 2/17/23, 3/2/23 and 3/6/23 by staff. That is three (3) showers within 30 days. There should have been eight showers in 30 days with only one documented refusal. Observation and interview on 03/9/23 at 9:25 AM with Resident #25 were seated in activity room looking unkept, and unshaven. The state surveyor asked Resident #25 when he had a shower last. He could not recall. Resident attended the resident council meeting took off ball cap.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update and personalize the mobility care plan with an ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update and personalize the mobility care plan with an ambulation status change and add a right leg brace for one resident (Resident #35), reviewed for range of motion and mobility, resulting in unassessed/unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #35: On 3/09/23, at 9:36 AM, Resident #35 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #35 has an immobilizer brace to the right leg. The brace appears old and is dirty. Resident #35's daughter was at bedside and offered that they had to give their mom her shower last Saturday because the shower aide doesn't come in a lot. Resident #35's daughter explained that they took their mom to the shower room, gave her mom their shower and that the social worker said it was ok. On 3/09/23, at 10:53 AM, a record review of Resident #35's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Osteoarthritis and Stroke. Resident #35 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and had severely impaired cognition. A review of the physician orders revealed . No weight bearing on right leg Active Revision Date 2/21/2023 . Skin integrity check under brace . Start Date 3/8/2023 . There was no other orders regarding the brace for example if the resident wears the brace 24 hours a day or possibly takes it off at night, A review of the Focus ADL's -Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (relate to) dementia Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 care plan revealed . Interventions Bathing: Assist with shower/bathing on scheduled shower days 2 x (times) week and PRN (as needed), Provide nail care and hair care as needed. May use shower chair Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 . TRANSFER resident requires assist PRN x 1, otherwise up ad lib with assistive device. Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 . A review of the care plan Focus The resident has limited physical mobility Date Initiated: 03/09/2023 revealed . Goal The resident will demonstrate the appropriate use of adaptive device (s) to increase mobility through the review date. Date Initiated: 03/09/2023 . Interventions Resident has a weight bearing restriction (specify) Date Initiated: 03/09/203 Uses a wheelchair for long-distance mobility. Assure feet are on foot rests when propelled by staff . Walk to Dine- Resident to be walked to the dining room for meals with x 1 assist. Use walker & gait belt. Date Initiated: 01/11/2023 Monitor/document/report PRN any s/sx (signs and symptoms) of immobility . Date Initiated: 12/02/2022 . The care plan was contradictive and not updated to reflect the resident's current ambulation status. A review of the [NAME] revealed . Transferring TRANSFER: resident requires assist PRN x 1, otherwise up ad lib with assistive device . Mobility Resident has a weight bearing restriction (specify) Uses a wheelchair for long-distance mobility. Assure feet are on foot rests when propelled by staff Walk to Dine - Resident to be walked to the dining . A review of the facility provided Quality of Life Purpose: Quality of life is fundamental principle that applies to all care and services provided to facility residents. Each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Responsible Party: All staff . Quality of Life - Sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. This includes a basic sense of satisfaction with oneself, the environment, the care received, the accomplishments of desired goals and control over one's life .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate between clinical and social services to pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate between clinical and social services to provide a person-centered comprehensive mood care plan for one resident (Resident #48), reviewed for behavioral care, resulting in unmet care needs with the likelihood of emotional, mood and behavioral needs being unassessed/unmet. Findings include: Resident #48: On 3/08/23, at 10:30 AM, Resident #48 was ambulating in the hallway. Resident #48 stopped closely and stared at surveyor. Resident #48 was asked how they were doing today and Resident #48 stated, Well, I made it out with the will of god and the men. Resident #48 ambulated to their room along with surveyor and talked about Korea and getting all the men out but then there was a big explosion. Resident #48 pointed to their roommate's bed and stated, He is out on the field right now. Resident #48 was wearing a red plaid button jacket type flannel and green and blue pajama bottoms. On 3/09/23, at 9:00 AM, a record review of Resident #48's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Personal history of other diseases of the nervous system and sense organs, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Diabetes Mellitus and Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Resident #48 required assistance with ADL's. According to the most recent Minimum Data set Assessment BIMS (brief mini mental score) of 4 the resident had severely impaired cognition. A review of the Focus the resident has an alteration in neurological status (SPECIFY) r/t Date Initiated: 10/08/2022 Goal The resident will be able to communicate needs daily through the review date. Date Initiated: 02/17/2023 . Interventions Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD (medical doctor) and follow Nursing up as indicated. Date Initiated: 02/17/2023 The care plan was incomplete and not personalized. A review of Kardex revealed SAFETY Date and description of other interventions put in place after a fall: 2/18/23 - offer toileting q (every) 2 hours while awake 2/22/23 - Offer toileting to resident two times through night when resident is sleeping and stay with the resident while he is in the bathroom at night Ask resident if he needs to use the bathroom every two hours while awake . There was no personalized intervention or description as to the residents behaviors of urinating all over and that he wanders. A review of the progress notes revealed the following: 2/28/2023 . Behavior occurred: Resident will wander out of his room during sleep hours looking for food. Staff met his needs then redirect him back to bed. This is resident's baseline. 2/23/2023 . VA note: (the resident) ambulates ad lib about facility. Participates in his ADL's as he is able. Feeds himself. Dresses self and toilets self. Staff monitor for need for assistance and assist as needed. Urinates places other that toilet at times. Needs direction to specific destinations . A review of the Behavioral Care Solutions progress note revealed . [DATE] . Consult requested to review patient's mood . Patient reports that he is unhappy because he's being treated like a prisoner of war . Staff report patient frequently reports that he is here to serve god Patient urinates all over per staff. He is oriented to person . Assessment & Plan Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood . Alzheimer's disease with late onset . Patient scores 4 on BIMS indicating server cognitive deficit. Would not recommend dementia medications due to patient's current BIMS score. A review of the Social Service progress notes revealed no mention of behaviors, Alzheimer's diagnosis, updates or intervention changes to the care plan for Resident #48's behaviors and diagnosis if Alzheimer's disease. On 3/09/2023, at 10:00 AM, Resident #48 was observed in the hallway with the same clothing on from the day before. The resident had 2 ball caps on their head. The resident was asked how their day was going and the resident was non-verbal. CNA G stopped and stated, he has days where he doesn't say anything at all. CNA G offered to ambulate with Resident #48. A review of the facility provided Quality of Life Purpose: Quality of life is fundamental principle that applies to all care and services provided to facility residents. Each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Responsible Party: All staff . Quality of Life - Sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. This includes a basic sense of satisfaction with oneself, the environment, the care received, the accomplishments of desired goals and control over one's life . A review of the facility provided Mood and Behavior Guideline Purpose: This facility promotes and supports a resident centered approach to care . Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, therefore an individualized approach to care is essential . Responsible Party: Clinical, Social Services . The objective of the Mood and Behavior Guideline is to provide a plan of care that is individualized to the resident's needs based upon the comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team. This plan of care will include medically related social services to address mood and behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that opened and partially used medications for 3 residents (Residents #30, Resident #40 and Resident #109) were date...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that opened and partially used medications for 3 residents (Residents #30, Resident #40 and Resident #109) were dated, 2) Failed to ensure that medications were administrated when prepared, and 3) Failed to ensure that 1 of 3 medication carts were maintained clean and sanitary, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination and outdated medications. Findings Include: Observation was done on 3/8/23 at 2:38 p.m., of C and D and E medication carts accompanied by Nurse LPN E. The following are the observations: Medication Cart C and D: -At 2:38 p.m., Med cart C & D was observed to have crushed meds and pieces of paper in drawer two. During an interview done on 2:38 p.m., Nurse LPN E said she was not sure who was assigned to clean the carts and stated, we all clean them when we use them. -For Resident #30 Lidocaine 4% patch (pain medication) was open and no date was found on the box. -For resident #109, a Norco 5 mg tablet (narcotic pain medication) was found sitting in a medication cup in the locked compartment (a set-up). During an interview done on 2/8/23 at 2:48 p.m., Nurse E said she was going to give it (the set-up Norco tablet). During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 2:40 p.m., Nurse E said all medications have to have a open date when opened. Medication Cart E: -At 10:05 a.m., Med cart E was observed to have crushed medications and pieces of paper I the second drawer. -For Resident #40, a Scopolamine 1 mg patch (for nausea) box was found open and partly used with no dates on the box. Review of CMS (Center for Medicaid and Medicare) Manual Regulations and Guidance for Medication Administration dated 2011, revealed medications are to be given when they are prepared (not set-up). Review of the facility medication Storage policy dated 4/18, said all med carts will be kept clean, and when the original container is open it has to be dated, the nurse will put a open date and an expiration date on the container.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident monthly infection data was analyzed for 12/22 and 1/23 for a census of 54 residents, resulting in the lik...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident monthly infection data was analyzed for 12/22 and 1/23 for a census of 54 residents, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, resident and staff illness, and antibiotic usage with possible hospitalization. Findings Include: Infection Control Data Analyzing: Review of the facility Infection Control Guideline dated 11/28/17, reported The Infection Control Preventionist and the Infection Control Prevention and Control Committee will utilize the information collected from both Process and Outcome Surveillance activities in order to analyze the data to identify opportunities for improved care and process and identify an action plan for follow up and corrective action. The analyzing will compare current and past infection control surveillance data, compare the reported incidence of infections by type and location. Based on analysis of data, develop and implement an action plan that includes correction actions, staff education, and measurable goals; data is reported to the Quality Control Committee. Review of the monthly resident and staff data collection dated 12/22 and 1/23, revealed incomplete data analyzing. The documentation did not have all the components of the facility Infection Control Guideline (dated 11/17). During an interview done on 3/9/23 at 8:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing/Infection Control Nurse, RN stated I did not do a complete analysis of the monthly data, I see it now. Review of the facility Infection Preventionist job description (un-dated), revealed the Infection Control Nurse was responsible for the facility's infection control program including surveillance, data collection and analysis of the data to determine corrective measures (staff education).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #28: On 3/08/23, at 9:30 AM, Resident #28 was lying in their bed. Their CPAP mask was lying face down on their nightsta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #28: On 3/08/23, at 9:30 AM, Resident #28 was lying in their bed. Their CPAP mask was lying face down on their nightstand. The face mask was covered with white residue. Resident #28 was asked who washed their mask for them and Resident #28 stated, I don't think it's ever been washed. The outside surface of the CPAP machine was covered in dry white flaky residue. Resident #28 complained of a scratchy throat and stuffy nose. On 3/08/2023, at 10:00 AM, an observation along with Nurse Manager (NM) H of Resident #28's CPAP mask was conducted. NM H was asked what they though the white residue was and Resident #28 spoke up and stated it's from my dry scalp. NM H shook the head straps and white dry flaky residue fell all over the nightstand. NM H picked up the CPAP machine and mask and left out of the room as they stated they were going to go clean it right away. On 3/09/23, at 10:43 AM, Resident #28 was lying in their bed and stated they cleaned my CPAP yesterday and it's nice and clean. Resident #28 remained stuffy and stated, my stuffiness is worse today. On 3/9/23, at 1:00 PM, a record review of Resident #28's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Congestive Heart Failure and weakness. Resident #28 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living and had intact cognition. A review of the Focus (the resident) has altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing r/t (related to) CHF Date Initiated: 09/02/2022 Goal The resident will have no complications related to SOB (shortness of breath) the review date. Date Initiated: 07/06/2022 . Interventions BIPAP/CPAP at night Date Initiated: 09/02/2022 . Weekly: Wash water tub, air tubing and mask headgear in warm H2O, using a mild detergent, rinse and air dry out of direct sunlight. Date Initiated: 03/08/2023 A review of the physician orders revealed Monthly: Wipe outside of unit with damp cloth and mild detergent. Clean the water tub with mild detergent and rinse. Fill the water tub with a solution of one part white vinegar to 10 parts water and let sit for 30 minutes, rinse and allow to air dry. Start Date 3/12/2023 . Weekly: Wash water tub, air tubing and mask headgear in warm H2O, using a mile detergent, rinse and air dry out of direct sunlight Start Date 2/12/2023 . Resident #14: Observation on 03/08/23 at 9:19 AM Of Resident #14's room revealed that the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device hose was open to the air noted lying in cookie crumbs on the bedside nightstand. The CPAP mask was laying on nightstand on brown paper towel with cookie crumbs noted under the mask. The mask is dry and not stored in a bag. Observed distilled water noted in in room, gallon jug on floor. Record review of Resident #14's Impaired gas exchange, need for continuous monitoring related to diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea), noted interventions add on 3/8/2023 to: Apply CPAP mask at bedtime, Wash water tub, air tubing and mask headgear in warm H2O (water), using mild detergent, rinse and air dry out of direct sun light. Both interventions were added after the state surveyor began to ask questions about the CPAP. The state surveyor noted that Oxygen therapy care plan date 3/8/2023 had added interventions also put in place. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 resident's (Resident #14, Resident #36 and Resident #107) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) masks were properly cleaned and stored when not in use, of 4 residents review for respiratory equipment, resulting in the likelihood for respiratory infection with unnecessary antibiotic usage. Findings Include: Resident #107: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool dated 2/24/23), and care plans dated 2/9/23 to 2/13/23, revealed Resident #107 was [AGE] years old, alert, and able to make his own healthcare decisions, dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnosis included, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic heart and lung disease, diabetes, hearts disease, sepsis (infection), and acute respiratory failure. Review of the physician order dated 2/24/23, reported BiPAP/CPAP every day shift on in AM. Cleanse mask soap and water; every night shift on at HS (at night). Review of the resident's oxygen care plan intervention dated 2/10/23, reported Bi-Pap - every night shift On/off in AM. Observation was made on 3/8/23 at 9:00 a.m., the resident was in his bed sleeping and his dry CPAP mask was sitting on his bedside table. The mask was not on a paper towel nor in a protective bag at the time. Review of the facility CPAP policy dated 2010, revealed no documentation regarding CPAP masks storage when not in use. Review of the Employee Equipment Use policy dated 3/22/2018, (which was given to this surveyor upon request for a facility equipment storage of CPAP mask policy) revealed no documentation of residents CPAP equipment at all. During a second observation made on 3/9/23 at 10:43 a.m., the resident was awake in his bed with his dry CPAP mask again sitting on his bedside stand. The mask was not on a paper towel, nor in a protect bag at the time. During a phone interview done on 3/10/23 at 7:42 a.m., the Director of Nursing/Infection Control Nurse, RN stated The mask (the CPAP mask) is stored in a bag when not in use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in the facility's laundry resulting in the increased potential for harm to its 54 residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in the facility's laundry resulting in the increased potential for harm to its 54 residents and staff. Findings include: On 3/8/23 at 2:12 PM, brown droplet staining, chipping paint and rust were observed on the ceiling and overhead lighting over folding tables and clean laundered items in the clean laundry storage room. At this time the surveyor inquired with Environmental Services Director, Staff M, on the current state of the ceiling in this room to which they stated, it's been like that for a while. We had boiler issues in the past. On 3/8/23 at 2:17 PM, an accumulation of dust and debris was observed behind the laundry dryer units. At this time the surveyor inquired with staff M on the frequency in which the flooring is cleaned and swept behind the dryers, to which they replied, Maintenance just did it, and Housekeeping sweeps and mops everyday. On 3/8/23 at 2:24 PM, both the exterior and interior of the laundry's clean linen storage cabinets were observed with heavy staining along with exposed/ chipped wood and peeling paint on its storage surfaces. At this time the surveyor inquired with staff M on the current state of the storage units to which they replied, yeah, it's time to seal them up again. On 3/8/23 between 2:33 PM, and 2:45 PM, during an environmental tour of the facility all the facilities clean linen storage closets were observed with clean linens, towels, and clean ready for use clothing items (such as socks) on the floor in each closet. On 3/8/23 at 2:46 PM, the surveyor inquired with staff M on the frequency in which the closets are monitored to ensure the items supplied to the residents are clean and sanitary, to which they replied, throughout the day.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that food preparation and kitchen equipment were maintained in a sanitary manner and in good working condition, and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that food preparation and kitchen equipment were maintained in a sanitary manner and in good working condition, and 2) Failed to ensure that the kitchen ice machine front grate was clean and dust free, resulting in an increased potential for food borne illness with possible hospitalization and with the potential to affect the census of 54 residents who consume nutrition from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/8/23 at 8:25 a.m., accompanied by [NAME] B, the following was observed: -At 8:25 a.m., the large can opener was noted to have silver paint chipping off the blade area which comes in contact with food when in use. During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 8:25 a.m., [NAME] B stated the paint is chipping off the blade. -At 8:30 a.m., clear wrapped cheese slices were opened, partly used, and had no dates on the clear wrap at all. There was some black smeared marker writing on the wrapping, but it was not readable. During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 8:30 a.m., [NAME] B stated no, it's not readable at all. -At 8:39 a.m., the resident microwave was found to have dried splashes and dried food inside on the door and top. During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 8:39 a.m., [NAME] B stated yes, it (the microwave) is dirty inside and on top. -At 8:40 a.m., the clean and ready for use large floor mixer was observed to have paint chipping off the attachment, directly over the bowl. -At 8:50 a.m., the kitchen ice machine front black grate was noted to have an excessive amount of dust and dirt on it. This grate was directly above the opening to the ice compartment. During an interview done on 3/8/23 at 8:50 a.m., [NAME] B stated He (Maintenance) has to clean that (ice machine). Review of the facility Dining Service Weekly Department Inspection sheets dated 2/23 and 3/23 (done on a weekly basis), revealed all areas of the kitchen were satisfactory. No concerns at all were documented. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code: Section 3-501.17, Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. 4-202.11 Food-Contact Surfaces. (A) Multiuse FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES shall be: (1) SMOOTH; (2) Free of breaks, open seams, cracks, chips, inclusions, pits, and similar imperfections; (3) Free of sharp internal angles, corners, and crevices; (4) Finished to have SMOOTH welds and joints; 4-602.11 Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be cleaned: (5) At any time during the operation when contamination may have occurred.
Feb 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00133950. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00133950. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #105) from 3 residents reviewed for falls. Resident #105 had a history of falls prior to admission and had two falls at the facility (on 01/07/23 and on 01/08/23) resulting in two fractures (Left distal radius fracture and left occipital fracture), hospitalization and pain. Findings Include: Resident #105: Review of the facility Face Sheet, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 1/6/23), Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/5/23, medical progress notes dated 1/5/23 through 1/9/23, revealed Resident #105 was 87 years-old, alert to self only with a BIMS of 3 (1 to 9= uninterviewable, 3=severe cognitive decline), had an evaluation score of 21 (at High Risk) for falls, with poor safety awareness; full code status and admitted on [DATE]. The resident had a history of falls with injury prior to admission to the facility. The resident's diagnosis upon admission included, recent preadmission fall with traumatic subdural hematoma (brain bleed) with neurosurgery, psychosis, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and repeated falls with supervision and assistance needed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), transfers and ambulation. Review of facility nurse's notes dated 1/5/23, documented Resident admitted ; appears alert with confusion. Oriented to self, not aware of time, location, or circumstances. Full code at this time. Resident argumentative at times, mostly noted when (Resident #105) doesn't understand. Ambulated independently despite repeated education to seek assistance. Resident unable to remember to use call light. Review of the facility admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, resident assessment tool dated 1/13/23-Resident not in facility at this time, discharged to hospital), reported the Resident #105 was supervision and one physical assist for transfers and toileting. Review of the facility Physical Therapy notes dated 1/6/23, reported Recent head injury (just prior to admission to facility) causing new cognitive impairment and ataxia (impaired coordination caused by recent medical condition). Patient presents with balance deficits, decreased dynamic balance, decreased functional capacity, decreased safety awareness, decreased static balance, gross motor coordination deficits, postural alignment control deficits, safety awareness deficits, strength impairments and motor control deficits. Review of the facility Occupational Therapy notes dated 1/6/23, reported reduced dynamic balance and increased need for assistance from others. Review of the facility's Resident #105's cognitive care plan dated 1/5/23, reported impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought r/t (related to) dementia; communicate with the resident regarding resident's capabilities. Review of the facility's Resident #105's high risk for fall's care plan dated 1/6/23, reported high risk for falls r/t dementia, poor safety awareness, hx (history) of falls; follow facility fall protocol (facility Fall Evaluation safety Guideline dated 11/28/17), anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Resident First Fall at Facility on 1/7/23: Review of the facility Incident Report dated 1/7/23, reported Resident #105 had a fall and was observed crawling on her knees on 1/7/23 at approximately 10:30 p.m. Review of Nursing Assistant/CNA L written statement dated 1/7/23, reported Around 10:30 pm, I was coming out of (another resident's room) when I saw (Resident #105) crawling in the middle of C-Hall. Review of the facility Nurse (LPN, H) statement (un-dated) reported The night resident observed walking in hallway several times (on 1/5/23) and staff assisted her back to bed without difficulty. Resident was seeking to go home; the following night (1/6/23) was my second night working with (Resident #105). I had received in report (from the hospital on 1/5/23) that her Seroquel (anti-psychotic medication, side effects: light-headiness, blurred vision, dizziness, problems moving) was discontinued from recommendation from social worker. I informed (Medical Director J) that resident remained restless and exit seeking at night and (Medical Director J) agreed to restart medication (the Seroquel). The night of the 7th (1/7/23), resident (Resident #105) was reported to this nurse by day nurse as having had increased behaviors and was given Ativan tabs ordered PRN (as needed-antianxiety medication, side effects: drowsiness/dizzy). Resident continued to have behaviors at start of shift wandering and combative with staff, so Ativan was given before resident was assisted to bed. Resident (#105) was later observed at around 10:30 p.m. crawling on hands and knees out of her room attempting to go into room across the hall. Asked resident how she came to be on the floor; I fell, I was trying to go to the bathroom. (Medical Director J) was made aware of fall and new orders to increase Depakote (seizure medication, side effects: dizziness, memory and mood changes, blurred vision). Residents Second Fall at Facility on 1/8/23: Review of the facility Incident Report dated 1/9/23, documented Patient (Resident #105) tried to stand from wheelchair while in her room near sink area. Unsuccessful transfer, patient complained of pain to wrist and right shoulder. Patient sent to ER for evaluation. Hospital completed series of x rays and reported on 1/9/23 at 3:30p of a hip and wrist fracture. The Incident report was completed on 1/9/23 (day after resident fell). Review of nurses (LPN, H) notes (un-dated) reported on 1/8/23, (Resident #105) sat in w/c (wheelchair) and both this nurse and CNA (Nursing Assistant/ F) assisted her with toileting. Then this nurse reported behavior to (Medical Director J), overheard resident yelling no repeatedly to CNA asking to help her into bed. CNA (CNA F) left resident (#105) in w/c at her request and came just outside room to tell this nurse (Nurse H) she refused to go to bed then we both heard resident yell out as she fell. Observed resident sitting on floor in front of sink stating that her wrist hurt, wanting ice. Ice pack provided and placed to resident satisfaction (Medical Director J) made aware of fall and ordered Ativan IM (intermuscular) to be given. EMS (Emergency Medical Service) called at that time from residents' bedside and was transferred to ER (Emergency Room) for being un-responsive. Review of the facility physician order dated 1/9/23 at 02:07 (2:07 a.m.), reported Ativan Injection Solution 2 MG/ML inject 0.1 ml intramuscularly STAT for agitation dose not administered. Resident unresponsive; transferred to ER. Review of hospital records dated 1/10/23, reported Left distal radius fracture, left occipital fracture, potential for right hip fracture. Due to frequent falls and other comorbidities, the family has elected to start hospice care. Review of facility fall investigation report for 1/8/23 (un-dated) reported CNA (F) went to the nurse's station to report refusal of care to the nurse (Nurse H) 10 ft away approx. and get her assistance. Less than 30 seconds later res. (resident #105) could be heard yelling. Resident was observed by (Nurse H) sitting on the floor in front of sink. Currently resident at the hospital because she is 1:1 (one-on-one for supervision). Review of the facility CNA F's written statement dated 1/8/23, documented I helped resident (Resident #105) off the toilet into her wheelchair. I asked the resident if she wanted to lay down, she began to yell at me saying no, no, no. I went down the hall to tell the nurse she did not want to lay down. Just as I told the nurse we heard a noise coming from down the hall we walked into her room, and I observed the resident laying on her back on the floor. During a phone interview done on 2/2/23 at 8:43 a.m., CNA F stated When I got on shift, I got report (Resident #105) was restless and combative and confused. She was standing up in the hallway with the nurse, I got her in her wheelchair. I wheeled her to her bed, she started yelling, she didn't want to lay down. I told her you can sit in your wheelchair. I told her let us know when she wanted to go to bed (Resident #105 had a BIMS of 3 and was combative at this time). I assumed she would come out in the hallway. I walked out of the room, talked to (Nurse H) and told her she would not lay down and we heard a bump. Her wheelchair had rolled out from behind her, it rolled back. I did not lock her wheelchair because it's a restraint. She was sitting on her bottom leaning against the sink. I left her alone in the room to notify the nurse. When this surveyor asked CNA F if she could have used the call light or hollered for assistance she stated, I probably should have hollered out for somebody. During an interview done on 2/3/23 at 10:38 a.m., Nurse H revealed CNA F did leave the residents room and leave her alone to come to inform her she would not go to bed. Nurse H said CNA F should not have left the resident alone in her room when she was trying to get up. Resident #105 had fallen the day prior to her 1/8/23 fall and had an extensive history of falls and behaviors with decreased cognition assessed and confirmed by facility staff. During an interview done on 2/2/23 at approximately 9:00 a.m., the Administrator stated (Resident #105) could un-lock it (her wheelchair); she was folding clothes the first night she was here, she was able to un-lock her wheelchair. During an interview done on 2/2/23 at 9:30 a.m., Director of Rehab Services PTA K was asked by this surveyor if a locked wheelchair was a restraint and she stated, locking a wheelchair is not a restraint, more safety. Review of the facility Restraint Use policy dated 4/21/20, reported Physical Restraint: any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that meets all of the following: Is attached or adjacent to the resident's body, cannot be removed easily by the resident, and restricts freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body. Review of the facility Fall Evaluation Safety Guideline policy dated 11/28/17, reported Identification of resident risk for accidents on admission: Utilize medical history and physical exam, observe resident in environment, individualized assessment for safety need for supervision. Falls Relates to Confusion: Place confused and/or risk residents close to the nursing station for observation and/or provide with diversional and targeted individualized activity. Multiple Falls: Keep resident in view during high risk times, if possible (this includes bring residents up to the nurse's station for close observation), Review the direct caregivers and ask them for intervention ideas. Refer to Therapeutic Recreation for activity intervention during high-risk movement groups, hydration, group activity, etc. (this includes documenting interventions prior to medication use).
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 18% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 30 points below Michigan's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 harm violation(s), $63,934 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 34 deficiencies on record, including 5 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $63,934 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Michigan. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 40/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is The Villa At Rose City's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns The Villa at Rose City an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Michigan, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is The Villa At Rose City Staffed?

CMS rates The Villa at Rose City's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 18%, compared to the Michigan average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at The Villa At Rose City?

State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at The Villa at Rose City during 2023 to 2025. These included: 5 that caused actual resident harm and 29 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates The Villa At Rose City?

The Villa at Rose City is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by VILLA HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 102 certified beds and approximately 66 residents (about 65% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Rose City, Michigan.

How Does The Villa At Rose City Compare to Other Michigan Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Michigan, The Villa at Rose City's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (18%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Villa At Rose City?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is The Villa At Rose City Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, The Villa at Rose City has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Michigan. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at The Villa At Rose City Stick Around?

Staff at The Villa at Rose City tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 18%, the facility is 27 percentage points below the Michigan average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was The Villa At Rose City Ever Fined?

The Villa at Rose City has been fined $63,934 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the Michigan average of $33,718. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is The Villa At Rose City on Any Federal Watch List?

The Villa at Rose City is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.