CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to Intake MI00138305.
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to Intake MI00138305.
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of a stage 4 pressure ulcer that included physician lead care for the evaluation and treatment for pressure ulcers and facility staff trained in the treatment of pressure ulcers for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #27), reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #27 developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer on the right gluteal (buttock) fold that worsened to an infected Stage 4 pressure ulcer that required hospitalization, IV antibiotics and surgical intervention.
Findings include:
On 8/2/23, the Nursing Home Administrator was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy that began on 6/7/23, when Resident #27 developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer, that worsened to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer, leading to hospitalization, IV (intravenous) antibiotics and surgical interventions.
Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dorsopathies (diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue associated with degenerative diseases of the spine) of the cervical (neck) region.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27, with a reference date of 4/19/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional Status revealed that Resident #27 required extensive assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and that Resident #27 could stand and bear weight with assistance of 1 person.
Review of Resident #27's assessment Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk dated 4/21/23, indicated that the document was not complete, and was void of answers to the questions. This was the most recent assessment prior to Resident #27 developing the Stage 4 pressure wound on Right gluteal fold. Prior to the assessment on 4/21/23, the most recent was completed on 11/3/22, which indicated that Resident #27 was at risk, and the current assessment completed on 7/20/23 indicated that Resident #27 was at high risk. Per the facility policy, Braden assessments are completed quarterly.
Review of Resident #27's Pain Care Plan revealed, .at risk due to diagnosis of Stage 4 pressure ulcer (no location) .Created 7/25/23. There were no interventions related to prevention/worsening of pressure ulcers.
Review of Resident #27's Skin Care Plan revealed, .at increased risk to develop skin breakdown, due to limited mobility, secondary to severe cervical spine disease, paraplegia, chronic pain, and a history of stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacrum. She has a history of choosing to not lay down at times, frequently requesting to get up when in bed, resorting to outburst of yelling loudly, and crying. She has been educated why laying down is important for her, she states that she understands, but does not care. She is at times incontinent of bladder. She developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer to right sacrum even with interventions. She was readmitted from hospital with stage 2 on sacrum. Edited on 7/25/23 by DON. INTERVENTIONS: Blue boots to bilateral feet while in bed, start date 7/25/23. May be up in chair for therapy and appointments, start date 7/25/23. Wedge cushion to help with turning and repositioning, start date 7/25/23. CNA to check skin daily and PRN (as needed) during care, start date 8/24/21. Nurse to check and document skin condition weekly with first bath of the week. Notify MD and wound care nurse if any problems arise, start date 8/24/21. Moisture barrier cream to any excoriation/irritation PRN. Notify physician if not effective, start date 8/24/21. Perform treatments per physicians order, start date 8/24/21. Provide and encourage supplements as ordered, start date 7/25/23. Assist and encourage with eating and drinking at meal time prn to ensure nutritional and fluid intake are sufficient to maintain healthy skin integrity and promote healing, start date 8/24/21. Ensure that water is within reach at bedside, start date 8/24/21. Alternating pressure mattress to bed and roho (pressure relieving) cushion to wheelchair, start date 7/25/23. Assist/encourage to keep heels elevated off bed. Assist and encourage to turn and reposition every 2-3 hours and side to side and PRN. May be on back for meals, start date 7/25/23, edited 7/25/23.
During an observation and interview on 07/31/23 at 11:06 AM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back, positioned slightly on her left side, with the head of bed (HOB) at 30 degrees. There was a wound vac (a type of therapy for wounds) powered on at the bedside on the night stand, leading to Resident #27's buttock area. Resident #27 reported that she was too weak and too tired to talk.
During an observation on 07/31/23 at 01:47 PM Resident #27 was in the same position as the previous observation, lying in bed on her back, positioned slightly on her left side, with the HOB at 30 degrees.
During an observation on 07/31/23 at 03:23 PM Resident #27 was in the same position as the previous observation, lying in bed on her back, positioned slightly on her left side, with the HOB at 30 degrees, and there was a visitor in the room.
During an observation and interview on 07/31/23 at 03:55 PM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back in the same position as observed since 11:00 AM. Family Member (FM) J reported that Resident #27 had a large wound on her right lower buttock, and FM J was notified of the wound the first part of June, and informed that it was an abrasion (skin damage from scraping or wearing away) from the elastic of her incontinence brief. FM J reported was never updated that Resident #27's wound was worsening, until she was in the room during a wound dressing change on 7/8/23 and observed it herself. FM J reported that Resident #27 had ultimately became ill and required transfer to hospital on 7/8/23, then was sent to another hospital for surgery for an infected Stage 4 pressure ulcer. FM J reported that Resident #27 had drastically declined from her normal self since developing the wound, requiring her to be bedridden and have a urinary catheter, but that prior to was very active, regardless of being wheelchair bound.
Review of Resident #27's Hospital Summary admission on [DATE] revealed, .Chief Complaint: Right gluteal decubital (relating to laying down) ulcer with possible infection. History of present illness: .transferred from (other hospital) to (this hospital) for possible gluteal ulcer infection. CT (imaging) at the outside hospital found irregular tissue with pockets of gas concerning for infection or abscess in the upper posterior right thigh extending to the level of the buttock. She was then transferred to (this hospital) .Plan: .will be admitted to hospital .Chronic right gluteal decubital ulcer, likely Stage 4, possible superimposed with infection with pockets of gas on CT .Vancomycin (antibiotic), Cefepime (antibiotic), and Metronidazole (antibiotic) .Operative Summary: .A scissor was used to cut away necrotic (dead) tissue overlying (covering) the wound .1.8 cm diameter wound with 5 cm undermining, unstageable, necrotic devitalized tissue debrided (removed), wound class dirty, PATOS (present at time of surgery). Excisional debridement with scissors down to level of subcutaneous (fat) tissue .Culture tissue/bone: Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus (bacterial infection sometimes resistant to antibiotic treatment), Finegoldia [NAME] (bacteria) Hospital Course: .presented .from an outside hospital for a possible gluteal ulcer infection .General surgery consulted. Debridement, irrigation and Wound Vac placement was recommended .She was treated with antibiotics which were transitioned to p.o. (oral) antibiotics. Foley catheter placed to help with wound care .
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 01:06 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound on Resident #27's right buttock fold was noted by staff initially on 6/7/23, and that it looked like the top layer of her skin had pushed away from the surface and stated, .I thought it was from her incontinence brief being too tight .Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that she notified FM J at that time, but did not notify the physician of the new wound. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound was not improving, and started getting worse on 6/22/23, with odor and slough (dead skin cells that accumulate in the wound bed) starting in the wound, and continued to deteriorate. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the only notification to the physician would have been the written order changes that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C made and stated, .he (MD D) had to sign them .I don't know if he physically assessed the wound .Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that Resident #27's wound got much worse on 7/6/23, and at that timeliest Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C notified the DON, and changed the wound treatment orders again. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that over the next couple days, nurses had to change the bandages frequently because of them becoming saturated with wound drainage. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that FM J was visiting during a wound treatment on 7/8/23 and insisted that Resident #27 be taken to the hospital due to the condition of the wound. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that Resident #27 had preferred to be up in her chair during the day and didn't like to lay in her bed, and that was the reason that MD D completed the unavoidable wound form on 7/21/23, after Resident #27 returned from the hospital. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that she did not document Resident #27's refusals to lay down and/or the efforts they had made to encourage her to lay down. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C was not able to describe any additional interventions that were attempted to relieve pressure when the resident declined to lay down in bed, other than asking Resident #27 to lay down. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that she did not involve Resident #27's responsible party for additional suggestions, when Resident #27 declined to lay down.
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 03:47 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) Q reported that Resident #27 was compliant and the CNA's had not ever reported any trouble with refusing cares. RN Q reported that just prior to going to the hospital, Resident #27's wound dressing was completely saturated, the area around the wound was red and warm, she had spiked a fever, was confused and stated, .(FM J) was adamant that she be sent to the hospital . RN Q reported that she had called MD D and left a message for him regarding Resident #27's condition and that the on-call physician gave the orders to sent to the hospital.
Review of Resident #27's Determination of Unavoidable Pressure Wound dated 7/21/23 (3 days after return from hospital) revealed, 1. Was a risk assessment completed upon admission? Yes - 9/12/19 and quarterly .3. Were nutritional interventions implemented and routinely evaluated? (no answer) .Does resident have 2 or more primary risk factors? Yes - Continuous urinary incontinence or chronic voiding dysfunction, Paraplegia (paralysis) .8. Did resident develop malnutrition and/or dehydration .NO .9. The physician has documented unavoidable pressure wound based on residents condition? (no answer). 10. List prevention and treatment implemented despite unavoidable criteria: turn side to side, elevate heels off bed, offer naps at 10:00 AM and 2:00 PM, alternating air mattress, pressure relief cushion, WC (wheelchair) block to rest foot off put pressure to right gluteal fold. The pressure wound located on the right gluteal fold, stage 4, is determined to be unavoidable due to choosing not to lay down, she becomes very angry when even asked. (signed by MD D)
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 09:49 AM, MD D reported that Resident #27 did not have a wound until she returned from the hospital and stated, .they found it at the hospital . MD D reported that new wounds may have orders started verbally over the phone, but that a physical assessment would be done the next time the physician was in the facility. MD D reported that he would expect the nurse to notify him of new wounds, but that if he saw an order for a wound treatment, MD D would question the order and stated, .but only if the order catches my eye .because I look at a lot of orders . MD D reported that he did not remember Resident #27 having any orders for wounds. MD D reported that Resident #27 is at very high risk to develop pressure ulcers due to her not cooperating with staff and stated, .I did not know about the wound, so no, I could not say that it was unavoidable .
Review of Weekly Meeting notes provided by the DON indicated that Resident #27's right gluteal fold wound was discussed on 6/22/23 and 6/29/23. There was not a physician present for these meetings.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 02:42 PM, DON reported that she had saw the wound about 1 week after it was first identified and at that time agreed that it was an abrasion from the incontinence brief. DON reported that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C was not certified in wound care, and to have a doctor look at new wounds was not part of their process and stated, .the doctors are usually ok with the orders that (LPN C) writes DON reported that Resident #27's wound was discussed in meetings every week, it was known that the wound was not improving and stated, .we normally have a doctor look at it if its changing .this fell through the cracks . DON reported that she did not think Resident #27's wound had been assessed but a physician, and that there was no documentation to indicate that it was.
Review of Resident #27's Wound Sheets revealed the following nursing documentation:
6/7/23: Right gluteal fold, wound type-abrasion, facility acquired, 0.4 cm length x 0.3 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, no odor.
6/15/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 0.7 cm length x 0.5 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, no odor.
6/22/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 1.0 cm length x 1.1 cm width x 0.2 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, mild odor.
6/28/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 1.8 cm length x 1.7 cm width x 0.7 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, 1/4 of wound yellow and red, medium amount of drainage, mild odor.
7/3/23: Right gluteal fold, (no type noted), facility acquired, 3.0 cm length x 3.2 cm width x 0.5 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, yellow, saturated with drainage, mild odor.
7/7/23: Right gluteal fold, (no type noted), facility acquired, 3.4 cm length x 3.8 cm width x 0.6 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, yellow, saturated with drainage, strong odor. Surrounding skin with hard edges and bruising.
Review of Resident #27's Written Orders revealed the following orders for wound dressings:
6/7/23: Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS (normal saline) pat dry, apply Mepilex (foam bandage), change every 5 days/PRN (as needed). signed by MD D.
6/15/23: DC (discontinue) Mepilex, new order: Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Xeroform (bandage that maintains moist environment) change daily and PRN. signed by MD D.
6/16/23: DC Mepilex. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Xeroform change daily. This was the same order as on 6/15/23. signed by MD D.
6/23/23: DC Xeroform. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Calcium Alginate and border gauze change daily. signed by MD D.
7/3/23: DC Calcium Alginate. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Hydrofera Blue (bandage that provides protection and addresses bacteria and yeast) 4 x 4 gauze, cover with border gauze and change every 3 days/PRN. signed by MD D.
7/6/23: DC Hydrofera Blue, Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Collagen (healing) Powder and cover with 4 x 4 border gauze. There was no physician signature on the order.
All of these orders were written by Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C .
Review of Resident #27's Physician Notes dated 6/23/23, indicated no documentation of a wound and or a skin assessment.
Review of Resident #27's Dietary Notes dated 4/19/23 indicated that appetite was usually good, the skin was intact and that there were no supplements in place. There were no further notes until 7/12/23, which indicated appetite was good, skin wound, and resident in the hospital.
Review of Resident #27's Hospital Dietician Consult dated 7/9/23 revealed, .PU (pressure ulcer) right buttock .does not meet criteria for malnutrition .maintaining weight.
During an observation on 08/01/23 at 09:09 AM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back, positioned slightly on her right side with the HOB at 30 degrees.
During an observation and interview on 08/01/23 at 09:35 AM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back, positioned slightly on her left side with the HOB at 30 degrees. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P reported that she had just repositioned Resident #27 onto her right side and stated, .we try to turn her every 2 hours .it was supposed to be at 9:00, I was a little late . CNA J reported that she did not know how bad Resident #27's wound was until she saw the soaked bandage just prior to her hospitalization a few weeks ago. CNA J reported that CNA H is Resident #27's regular CNA, so she would know more about her.
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 01:58 PM, CNA H reported that Resident #27's wound started small, like an abrasion, the incontinence briefs were not too small, but when Resident #27 was sitting, her buttocks pressed on the edge of the brief. CNA H reported that Resident #27 preferred to be up in her chair during the day, but understood that she needed to get off her bottom, and did not decline laying down for CNA H. CNA H reported that she had been Resident #27's aide for a long time and Resident #27 could stand up, with help to relieve pressure off her bottom and would ask to stand longer to stretch her legs. CNA H reported that she (CNA H) would toilet Resident #27 multiple times a day, just to relief the pressure and stated, .but I was off work a lot during the time her wound started and have been until today . CNA H reported that Resident #27 did drink supplements, but needed encouragement.
During an observation on 08/01/23 at 10:40 AM in Resident #27's room, CNA P performed incontinence care on Resident #27. Resident #27's buttocks were observed with a wound vac covering the right lower buttock and a large bandage covering the coccyx (tailbone) area.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 10:57 AM, CNA F reported that she was not aware that Resident #27 had a wound until she went to the hospital for it a few weeks ago. CNA F reported that Resident #27 was very different before she was hospitalized and stated, .she could stand up .could use the bathroom .she liked to go to the dining room .always brushing her hair .
Review of the facility policy Skin Assessment and Ulcer Prevention revealed, .Goal: To assess each resident upon admission and at least quarterly for the potential for skin breakdown utilizing the standardized scale (Braden). To assess each resident with wounds for changes and determine proper wound treatments .When a wound is identified the physician will be notified, the resident will be added to the weekly physician wound rounding sheet with wound details. Physician will sign and document that each resident was seen in (electronic health record). The policy was complied by DON on 8/2/23 and approved by NHA on 8/2/23.
On 8/2/23, the survey team verified the facility completed the following to remove the Immediate Jeopardy.
1. Resident #27 will be seen by the attending physician and will have a consultation with the wound clinic on August 2, 2023.
2. Any resident with a Stage 1 pressure ulcer or higher will be seen by the attending physician to assess the wound and document review on August 2, 2023.
3. The Pressure Ulcer policy and procedure has been updated as of August 2, 2023, to include immediate notification of physician when a wound is identified and that the resident will be added to the physician's weekly rounds. All licensed nursing staff will be trained in person or over the phone on the updated policy and procedure and acknowledgement of the training will be tracked by signature of the nurse or documentation from the trainer on August 2, 2023.
Although the immediate jeopardy was removed on 8/2/23, the facility remained out of compliance with a scope of isolated and severity of actual harm due to all nursing staff had not received training for wound care/skin prevention program and sustained compliance had not been verified by the state agency.
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate pain monitoring and management for 1 of 1 ( Resident #31) resident reviewed for pain management, resulting in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate pain monitoring and management for 1 of 1 ( Resident #31) resident reviewed for pain management, resulting in unrelieved pain that impacted the resident's quality of life.
Findings include:
Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #31, was originally admitted to the facility with pertinent diagnoses which included sciatica (pain in the lower back that can spread to buttock, groin, and legs) and pelvic mass.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31, with a reference date of 5/3/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 which indicated Resident #31 was moderately cognitively impaired.
Review of Resident #31's Care Plan revealed, ( Resident #31) has a potential for pain due to recent diagnosis of colitis (inflammation of the colon) and respiratory failure. Approach: Assess/record/report pain characteristics including intensity (0-10), location, onset, duration, and precipitating or relieving factors. Created: 4/27/23 . Observe for non verbal cues of pain, i.e., grimacing, crying, restlessness, irresistibleness, or moaning for possible need for pain intervention. Created: 4/27/23 . Staff will anticipate need for pain relief, instruct remind resident to request medication before pain becomes too great, providing better control of pain.
Review of Resident #31's Medication Administration Record revealed, Orders: Morphine (medication to treat severe pain) 20 mg/mL (milligrams per millimeter) solution. Take 0.25 mL (5 MG) every 2 hours as needed for pain or sob (shortness of breath). Tramadol (medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 mg P.O. (by mouth) TID (Three times a day).
Review of Resident #31's Medication Administration Record revealed that Resident #31 had received one dose of morphine on 7/20/23, 7/21/23, 7/23/23, 7/26/23 and 7/31/23.
During a care observation on 8/01/23 at 10:58 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C and Certified Nursing Assistant M completed incontinence care and a dressing change for Resident #31. LPN- WN C removed Resident #31's brief and began to wipe Resident #31's perineal area. As LPN-WN C started wiping, Resident #31 began screaming out in pain and begging for staff to stop stating Don't do that! Please don't do that!. CNA M reported that Resident #31 had a vaginal mass that was getting worse and anytime staff had to clean the area around the mass, Resident #31 would scream out in pain. Resident #31 had screamed so loud that another staff member knocked on the door and entered to check on Resident #31 and staff. LPN-WN C reported that she thought Resident #31 had scheduled pain medication but she did not know if Resident #31 had been given any additional as needed medication to provide pain relief prior to providing care for Resident #31.
During an interview on 8/01/23 at 1:39 PM, Hospice Nurse (HN) K reported that Resident #31 had increased pain related to the pelvic mass. HN K reported that comfort care and pain management were the most important goals of care for Resident #31. HN K reported that Resident #31 frequently became agitated during care because of the pain that she experienced, so he would expect that staff were providing Resident #31 with the PRN Morphine due to the severity of her pain.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 7:38 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) V reported that Resident #31 did not get the PRN morphine often. RN V reported that Resident #31 often yelled out during care and refused care. RN V reported that she was unaware of staff reporting that Resident #31 was experiencing pain during incontinence care. RN V reported that Resident #31 had not received PRN morphine prior to incontinence care to help with pain.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 9:03 AM, CNA S reported that Resident #31 often yelled out during care, especially incontinence care. CNA S reported that she had noticed an increase in refusal of care and yelling out during incontinence care over the last few months.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 1:22 PM, CNA E reported that she had definitely noticed an increase in pain over the last month, and felt that it was related to Resident 31's pelvic mass. CNA E reported that after the pelvic mass was discovered, providing incontinence care on Resident #31 became much harder to complete because of the pain that Resident #31 experienced during care. CNA E reported that it was common for Resident #31 to scream and cry out during incontinence care. CNA E was unaware if nurses were giving medication prior to incontinence care to assist with comfort and reduce pain.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 11:44 AM, RN V reported that she had administered PRN morphine to Resident #31 at 11:30 AM on this day in preparation for incontinence care to determine if pre-medicating with morphine would assist with the pain Resident #31 experienced during incontinence care.
During a care observation on 8/2/23 at 11:50 AM, CNA P and CNA Y removed Resident #31's brief and CNA P began to wipe Resident #31's perineal area. As CNA P wiped Resident #31, she softly said ow but she did not shout out. Resident #31 was relaxed, calm, and did not appear to struggle with perineal care. As CNA P and CNA Y finished completing care, Resident #31 stated see it's much better. CNA P reported that she felt that the morphine medication helped Resident #31 tremendously and that when she (CNA P ) had completed care earlier in the day that Resident #31 was screaming nonstop. CNA P reported that Resident #31 seemed to be able to tolerate incontinence care much better with pain medication.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 12:08 PM, HN K reported that he was under the assumption that Resident #31 was receiving the PRN morphine at least once per shift. HN K reported that the morphine was ordered for breakthrough pain, and that he would expect that the morphine would be given prior to cares anytime Resident #31 was experiencing pain with care. HN K reported he would expect nursing staff to assess Resident #31's pain prior to completing care to determine the need for pain relief due to Resident #31's frequent screaming out during care.
During an interview on 8/2/23 at 1:35 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported that she was aware that Resident #31 experienced pain with care, but that staff had not reported any concerns related to Resident #31's increased pain with incontinence care since developing the vaginal mass.
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0710
(Tag F0710)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #30
Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #30 was admitte...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #30
Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #30 was admitted with diagnoses that included diabetes, osteomyelitis of vertebra, thoracic region, depression, muscle weakness, cauda equina syndrome (nerve roots in the lumbar spine are compressed, cutting off sensation and movement), and fracture of left lower leg, and spinal stenosis, lumbar region.
Review of Physician Note dated 5/17/23 at 12:45 PM, revealed, no documentation in the note of the resident admitting with pressure ulcers nor any assessment of the pressure ulcers by the physician. Note contained notation of .Review of system: 10 point review of system conducted and is negative except for stated above in HPI . Review of assessment and plan revealed no noted assessment or plan for Resident #30's pressure ulcers.
Review of the medical record revealed the following physician entries dated 5/17/23, 7/12/23, 7/14/23, 7/19/23 and 8/2/23.
Review of the full medical record revealed facility staff first documentation of a pressure ulcer in Resident #30's was in Nursing progress notes on 5/19/23 at 4:19 PM, which revealed, .Cleanse left proximal/medial and medial/distal ankle with ns pat dry apply Mepilex change every 7 days. Cleanse left second toe with ns pat dry apply small Mepilex change every 7 days. Moisture barrier cream to right to sacrum, right buttock, right gluteal fold, right upper thigh at all times. Nurses to ensure that this is done at least once a shift. Monitor left ankle daily Monitor right ankle/shin daily monitor back incision daily .
Review of Nursing Progress Notes dated 6/16/23 at 00:04 AM, revealed, .Resident continues with tx to coccyx-area with darker spots in middle/pink, open areas noted surrounding darker sloughing tissue. Will continue to monitor . This note indicated that Resident #30's coccyx wound had worsened.
Review of Order dated 6/16/23, revealed, .D/C monitor (L) ankle, (R) ankle, (L) shin and back .D/C moisture barrier cream .Cleans buttock .NS Pat dry Apply Calcium Alginate ABD, Tape Change Daily & PRN . Note: This order was not signed by the physician nor dated.
Further review of the medical record showed no documentation of a physician note for the month of June 2023.
Review of Physician Progress Note dated 7/12/23 at 1:00 PM, revealed, .Acute visit: [AGE] year-old female is being seen today to evaluate her decubitus ulcer. Patient has had a decubitus ulcer since admission. She is currently improving. She is doing well. She is having dressing change with calcium alginate and ABD pad to be changed daily. She has significant improvement since admission. Patient is currently on antibiotics for osteomyelitis/discitis, She is doing well with the antibiotics .On examination: Her vital signs are recorded as stable, She is afebrile .Examination of the decubitus lesions shows a large decubitus ulcer over the left gluteal area extending up to the inner margin. The margins are irregular and has healthy granulated tissue with yellow slough covering about 40% of the ulcer. The ulcer measures 11.5 cm in length 13.6 cm wide and 6 mm deep. This is a stage III ulcer .Assessment and plan. 1) large decubitus stage III ulcer .-Continue calcium alginate with ABD pad dressing secured and change daily .
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 01:47 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported she would write out the orders and the doctor reviewed and signed the orders. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported the providers come in the facility three times per week. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported one physician comes in three times per week, then the other physician comes in three times per week. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported she started off treating the pressure ulcer with Calcium alginate started off as that on ABD. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported the order was changed to include the calcium alginate with silver to assist in cleaning up the wound and that was started on 7/6/23. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported she was unsure why there were black specks in the wound and a culture was not ordered. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported black specks would be seen occasionally, not very often, and the resident's whole buttocks were black when she admitted to the facility. When queried what she thought the black specks were, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported she was unsure. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported the lateral ankle and shin ran together and now they were two different wounds as the middle of it had healed. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported the right buttock ulcer and sacrum ulcer merged on 6/22/23 and that was why the sacrum wound got bigger and then merging was not a bad thing.
Review of the record on 8/2/23 showed a physician note entered for 6/16/23 at 2:33 PM recorded as a late entry on 8/2/23 at 2:33 PM. No assessment and plan of care for the pressure ulcer was mentioned in the note.
Review of policy Physician Services revised on 2/28/21 revealed, .5. The Physician will see the resident .must review the resident's total program of care including medications and treatments each visit and date, write and sign a progress note for that visit .7. Sign and date all orders except for flu and pneumococcal vaccines which may be administered per physician approved policy after an assessment for contraindications .
This citation pertains to Intake MI00138305.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician assessed and monitored a change in condition after reviewing and signing multiple orders for pressure ulcer treatment in 2 of 5 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #30), reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the lack of physician assessment, monitoring, and ultimate hospitalization for Resident ##27 who developed a Stage 4 pressure ulcer with osteomyelitis and lack of consistent physician assessment and monitoring of a pressure ulcer for Resident #30.
Findings include:
Resident #27
Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dorsopathies (diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue associated with degenerative diseases of the spine) of the cervical (neck) region.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27, with a reference date of 4/19/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional Status revealed that Resident #27 required extensive assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and that Resident #27 could stand and bear weight with assistance of 1 person.
During an observation and interview on 07/31/23 at 03:55 PM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back in the same position as observed since 11:00 AM. Family Member (FM) J reported that Resident #27 had a large wound on her right lower buttock, and FM J was notified of the wound the first part of June, and informed that it was an abrasion (skin damage from scraping or wearing away)from the elastic of her incontinence brief. FM J reported was never updated that Resident #27's wound was worsening, until she was in the room during a wound dressing change on 7/8/23 and observed it herself. FM J reported that Resident #27 had ultimately became ill and required transfer to hospital on 7/8/23, then was sent to another hospital for surgery for an infected Stage 4 pressure ulcer. FM J reported that Resident #27 had drastically declined from her normal self since developing the wound, requiring her to be bedridden and have a urinary catheter, but that prior to was very active, regardless of being wheelchair bound.
Review of Resident #27's Hospital Summary admission on [DATE] revealed, .Chief Complaint: Right gluteal decubital (relating to laying down) ulcer with possible infection. History of present illness: .transferred from (other hospital) to (this hospital) for possible gluteal ulcer infection. CT (imaging) at the outside hospital found irregular tissue with pockets of gas concerning for infection or abscess in the upper posterior right thigh extending to the level of the buttock. She was then transferred to (this hospital) .Plan: .will be admitted to hospital .Chronic right gluteal decubital ulcer, likely Stage 4, possible superimposed with infection with pockets of gas on CT .Vancomycin (antibiotic), Cefepime (antibiotic), and Metronidazole (antibiotic) .Operative Summary: .A scissor was used to cut away necrotic (dead) tissue overlying (covering) the wound .1.8 cm diameter wound with 5 cm undermining, unstageable, necrotic devitalized tissue debrided (removed), wound class dirty, PATOS (present at time of surgery). Excisional debridement with scissors down to level of subcutaneous (fat) tissue .Culture tissue/bone: Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus (bacterial infection sometimes resistant to antibiotic treatment), Finegoldia [NAME] (bacteria) Hospital Course: .presented .from an outside hospital for a possible gluteal ulcer infection .General surgery consulted. Debridement, irrigation and Wound Vac placement was recommended .She was treated with antibiotics which were transitioned to p.o. (oral) antibiotics. Foley catheter placed to help with wound care. Found to have a poor appetite She has a history of severe protein calorie malnutrition but had improved and did not meet criteria for that during this hospitalization .
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 01:06 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound on Resident #27's right buttock fold was noted by staff initially on 6/7/23, and that it looked like the top layer of her skin had pushed away from the surface and stated, .I thought it was from her incontinence brief being too tight . Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that she notified FM J at that time, but did not notify the physician of the new wound. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound was not improving, and started getting worse on 6/22/23, with odor and slough (dead skin cells that accumulate in the wound bed) starting in the wound, and continued to deteriorate. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the only notification to the physician would have been the written order changes that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C made and stated, .he (MD D) had to sign them .I don't know if he physically assessed the wound . Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that Resident #27's wound got much worse on 7/6/23, and at that time Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C notified the DON, and changed the wound treatment orders again, but did not notify the physician.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 02:42 PM, DON reported that she had saw the wound about 1 week after it was first identified and at that time agreed that it was an abrasion from the incontinence brief. DON reported that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C was not certified in wound care, and to have a doctor look at new wounds was not part of their process and stated, .the doctors are usually ok with the orders that (Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C ) writes DON reported that Resident #27's wound was discussed in meetings every week, it was known that the wound was not improving and stated, .we normally have a doctor look at it if its changing .this fell through the cracks . DON reported that she did not think Resident #27's wound had been assessed but a physician, and that there was no documentation to indicate that it was.
Review of Resident #27's Physician Notes dated 6/23/23, indicated no documentation of a wound and or a skin assessment. This was the only physician visit recorded following 6/7/23 when the wound was first identified.
Review of Resident #27's Wound Sheets revealed the following nursing documentation:
6/7/23: Right gluteal fold, wound type-abrasion, facility acquired, 0.4 cm length x 0.3 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, no odor.
6/15/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 0.7 cm length x 0.5 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, no odor.
6/22/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 1.0 cm length x 1.1 cm width x 0.2 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, red, small amount of drainage, mild odor.
6/28/23: Right gluteal fold, abrasion, facility acquired, 1.8 cm length x 1.7 cm width x 0.7 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, 1/4 of wound yellow and red, medium amount of drainage, mild odor.
7/3/23: Right gluteal fold, (no type noted), facility acquired, 3.0 cm length x 3.2 cm width x 0.5 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, yellow, saturated with drainage, mild odor.
7/7/23: Right gluteal fold, (no type noted), facility acquired, 3.4 cm length x 3.8 cm width x 0.6 cm depth, no undermining, no tunneling, yellow, saturated with drainage, strong odor. Surrounding skin with hard edges and bruising.
Review of Resident #27's Written Orders revealed the following orders for wound dressings:
6/7/23: Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS (normal saline) pat dry, apply Mepilex (foam bandage), change every 5 days/PRN (as needed). signed by MD D.
6/15/23: DC (discontinue) Mepilex, new order: Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Xeroform (bandage that maintains moist environment) change daily and PRN. signed by MD D.
6/16/23: DC Mepilex. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Xeroform change daily. This was the same order as on 6/15/23. signed by MD D.
6/23/23: DC Xeroform. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Calcium Alginate and border gauze change daily. signed by MD D.
7/3/23: DC Calcium Alginate. Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Hydrofera Blue (bandage that provides protection and addresses bacteria and yeast) 4 x 4 gauze, cover with border gauze and change every 3 days/PRN. signed by MD D.
7/6/23: DC Hydrofera Blue, Cleanse right gluteal fold with NS pat dry, apply Collagen (healing) Powder and cover with 4 x 4 border gauze. There was no physician signature on the order.
All of these orders were written by Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C .
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 09:49 AM, MD D reported that Resident #27 did not have a wound until she returned from the hospital and stated, .they found it at the hospital . MD D reported that new wounds may have orders started verbally over the phone, but that a physical assessment would be done the next time the physician was in the facility. MD D reported that he would expect the nurse to notify him of new wounds, but that if he saw an order for a wound treatment, MD D would question the order and stated, .but only if the order catches my eye .because I look at a lot of orders . MD D reported that he did not remember Resident #27 having any orders for wounds. MD D reported that Resident #27 is at very high risk to develop pressure ulcers and stated, .I did not know about the wound.
Review of Weekly Meeting notes provided by the DON indicated that Resident #27's right gluteal fold wound was discussed on 6/22/23 and 6/29/23. There was not a physician present for these meetings.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to Intake MI00138305.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** This citation pertains to Intake MI00138305.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in a condition (new and worsened wound) and failed to notify the resident representative of the worsening of a wound for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #27), reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the lack of physician assessment, monitoring, and delay in treatment for a Stage 4 pressure ulcer, and the inability of the physician and resident representative to participate in medical decisions regarding care and treatment.
Findings include:
Resident #27
Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dorsopathies (diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue associated with degenerative diseases of the spine) of the cervical (neck) region.
Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27, with a reference date of 4/19/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional Status revealed that Resident #27 required extensive assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and that Resident #27 could stand and bear weight with assistance of 1 person.
During an observation and interview on 07/31/23 at 03:55 PM Resident #27 was lying in bed on her back in the same position as observed since 11:00 AM. Family Member (FM) J reported that Resident #27 had a large wound on her right lower buttock, and FM J was notified of the wound the first part of June, and informed that it was an abrasion (skin damage from scraping or wearing away)from the elastic of her incontinence brief. FM J reported was never updated that Resident #27's wound was worsening, until she was in the room during a wound dressing change on 7/8/23 and observed it herself. FM J reported that Resident #27 had ultimately became ill and required transfer to hospital on 7/8/23, then was sent to another hospital for surgery for an infected Stage 4 pressure ulcer. FM J reported that Resident #27 had drastically declined from her normal self since developing the wound, requiring her to be bedridden and have a urinary catheter, and that previously was very active, regardless of being wheelchair bound.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 01:06 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound on Resident #27's right buttock fold was noted by staff initially on 6/7/23, and that it looked like the top layer of her skin had pushed away from the surface and stated, .I thought it was from her incontinence brief being too tight . Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that she notified FM J at that time, but did not notify the physician of the new wound. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the wound was not improving, and started getting worse on 6/22/23, with odor and slough (dead skin cells that accumulate in the wound bed) starting in the wound, and continued to deteriorate. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that the only notification to the physician would have been the written order changes that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C made and stated, .he (MD D) had to sign them .I don't know if he physically assessed the wound .Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that Resident #27's wound got much worse on 7/6/23, and at that time Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C notified the DON, and changed the wound treatment orders again. Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C reported that FM J and/or MD D were not notified of Resident #27's wound worsening.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 02:42 PM, DON reported that she had saw the wound about 1 week after it was first identified and at that time agreed that it was an abrasion from the incontinence brief. DON reported that Licensed Practical Nurse Wound Nurse (LPN-WN) C was not certified in wound care, and to have a doctor look at new wounds was not part of their process and stated, .the doctors are usually ok with the orders that (LPN C) writes DON reported that Resident #27's wound was discussed in meetings every week, it was known that the wound was not improving and stated, .we normally have a doctor look at it if its changing, we did not .this fell through the cracks . DON reported that she did not think Resident #27's wound had been assessed but a physician, and that there was no documentation to indicate that it was.
Review of Weekly Meeting notes provided by the DON indicated that Resident #27's right gluteal fold wound was discussed on 6/22/23 and 6/29/23. There was not a physician present for these meetings.
Review of Resident #27's Physician Notes dated 6/23/23, indicated no documentation of a wound and or a skin assessment.
In an interview on 08/02/23 at 09:49 AM, MD D reported that Resident #27 did not have a wound until she returned from the hospital and stated, .they found it at the hospital . MD D reported that new wounds may have orders started verbally over the phone, but that a physical assessment would be done the next time the physician was in the facility. MD D reported that he would expect the nurse to notify him of new wounds, but that if he saw an order for a wound treatment, MD D would question the order and stated, .but only if the order catches my eye .because I look at a lot of orders . MD D reported that he did not remember Resident #27 having any orders for wounds. MD D reported that Resident #27 is at very high risk to develop pressure ulcers and stated, .I did not know about the wound.
Review of the facility policy Skin Assessment and Ulcer Prevention revealed, .When a wound is identified the physician will be notified, the resident will be added to the weekly physician wound rounding sheet with wound details. Physician will sign and document that each resident was seen in (electronic health record). The policy was complied by DON on 8/2/23 and approved by NHA on 8/2/23.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to minimize the risk of scalding and burns by allowing domestic hot water to exceed 120°F in one of two shower rooms. This resulted in an inc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to minimize the risk of scalding and burns by allowing domestic hot water to exceed 120°F in one of two shower rooms. This resulted in an increased risk of injury among residents who use the Station One Spa room.
Findings Include:
During an environmental tour of the facility, at 2:32 PM on 7/31/23, an interview with Certified Nurses Assistant CC found that it takes a while for hot water to reach the shower, so staff typically leave the hot water running at the sink in the showers. At this time, the sink was slowly running and the hot water temperature of station two spa was 113F.
During a tour of the unlocked station one spa, at 2:36 PM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the sink was slowly running, as the surveyor turned the sink pressure higher and tested the hot water, it was found to reach 125.2F after being tested with a Thermoworks Rapid Read thermometer.
During a tour of the unlocked station one clean utility room, at 2:37 PM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the hot water reached 120.7F.
During a tour of the unlocked station one soiled utility room, at 2:38 PM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the hot water reached 122F.
An interview with Assistant Maintenance Director AA, at 3:02 PM on 7/31/23, found that hot water should be between 105F and 120F
An interview with Maintenance Director Z, at 4:00 PM on 7/31/23, found that hot water in the facility does not recirculate continuously, which leaves temperature variations as hot water travels to its source destination. With the boiler located above station one, the higher temperatures are found in this area. MD Z stated that its hard to achieve hot water on station two with the current set up and we have looked into adding recirculation pumps and return hot water lines to alleviate this issue.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper cooling methods of potentially hazar...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper cooling methods of potentially hazardous foods; 2. Thoroughly clean food and no-food contact surfaces to sight and touch; 3. Provide air gaps on all on drains originating from food contact surfaces; and 4. Properly store emergency food product. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 61 residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Findings Include:
1.
During the initial tour of the kitchen, starting at 10:20 AM on 7/31/23, an interview with [NAME] BB found that the facility does not routinely cool food and doesn't have anything cooling at this time.
During a walkthrough of the walk-in cooler, at 10:25 AM on 7/31/23, it was observed that a full-size six-inch chaffing pan was found with the prepared ingredients for cooking au gratin potatoes. At this time, the dish was covered tightly with saran wrap with increased condensation and melted butter on the top. An interview with cook BB found that she added hot water to the pan to finish preparation this morning. Using an infra-red thermometer, the outside of the chaffing dish was found to be 46F.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.15 Cooling Methods. (A) Cooling shall be accomplished in accordance with the time and temperature criteria specified under § 3-501.14 by using one or more of the following methods based on the type of FOOD being cooled: (1) Placing the FOOD in shallow pans; (2) Separating the FOOD into smaller or thinner portions; (3)Using rapid cooling EQUIPMENT; (4) Stirring the FOOD in a container placed in an ice water bath; (5) Using containers that facilitate heat transfer; (6) Adding ice as an ingredient; or (7) Other effective methods. (B) When placed in cooling or cold holding EQUIPMENT, FOOD containers in which FOOD is being cooled shall be: (1) Arranged in the EQUIPMENT to provide maximum heat transfer through the container walls; and (2) Loosely covered, or uncovered if protected from overhead contamination as specified under Subparagraph 3-305.11(A)(2), during the cooling period to facilitate heat transfer from the surface of the FOOD.
2.
During a tour of the facility, at 10:28 AM on 7/31/23, observation of the ice machine found increased amounts of black accumulation along the top portion of the white inside shield. When asked if she could see the accumulation, Registered Dietitian (RD) L stated yes. Further review of the ice scoop holder found increased amounts of crusted debris accumulation in the bottom of the holder. When shown to RD L she took the holder to get washed. When asked how the ice machine is cleaned, RD L stated that housekeeping takes care of the ice machines.
During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:45 AM on 7/31/23, a review of the drink area found increased accumulation on the spout of the juice dispenser. When asked how often the juice machine gets cleaned, RD L stated that staff soak it in hot water overnight. Further review of the area found increased accumulation around the underside portions of the coffee and hot chocolate machines.
During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:47 AM on 7/31/23, a review of the single door [NAME] and True reach in units found increased amounts of debris in the top portions of the gaskets.
During a tour of the facility, at 11:01 AM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the microwave in the kitchen was found with bubbling, pitting, and scoring on the inside top seams of the unit. When shown to RD L she stated she has been meaning to get a new unit.
During the initial tour of the facility, at 2:21 PM on 7/31/23, on station one clean utility, it was found that an increased amount of debris accumulation was evident on the inside right portion of the ice machine.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris.
3.
During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:35 AM on 7/31/23, it was observed that no air gap (a physical gap between the drain line and sewer line to prevent the backflow or backsiphonage of wastewater into equipment) was present on the sanitizer compartment of the three-compartment sink and that it was directly connected to the wastewater line. When asked if she knew why there was not an air gap installed, RD L stated that it's something that always gets brought up and she is unsure. When asked if there was a variance associated with the lack of an air gap, RD L could not remember, but stated it always comes up when they get inspected.
During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:50 AM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the preparation sink was found with a direct connection of the wastewater line. Further review found an unapproved check valve installed on the direct connection.
During the initial tour of the station 2 clean utility room, at 2:21 PM on 7/31/23, it was observed that the drains coming from the ice machine were found sunken into the floor drain, no longer making an air gap for proper protection from the backflow of wastewater.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this section, a direct connection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or UTENSILS are placed. (B) Paragraph (A) of this section does not apply to floor drains that originate in refrigerated spaces that are constructed as an integral part of the building. (C) If allowed by LAW, a WAREWASHING machine may have a direct connection between its waste outlet and a floor drain when the machine is located within 1.5 m (5 feet) of a trapped floor drain and the machine outlet is connected to the inlet side of a properly vented floor drain trap. (D) If allowed by LAW, a WAREWASHING or culinary sink may have a direct connection.
4.
During an interview with RD L, at 11:10 AM on 7/31/23, it was found that the emergency food used to be stored off site, but she is not sure where it is currently stored.
During a tour of the emergency food product, with Maintenance Director Z, at 12:50 PM on 7/31/23, found that the product was stored underneath a wastewater line in the basement of an offsite facility.
According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-305.12 Food Storage, Prohibited Areas.FOOD may not be stored: .(F) Under sewer lines that are not shielded to intercept potential drips; .
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This def...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all of the 61 residents in the facility.
Findings include:
During an interview with Maintenance Director (MD) Z, at 12:45 PM on 7/31/23, it was found that staff flush minimal use fixtures, but have not been logging it down. When asked how often staff are flushing water, MD Z stated that weekly he would flush toilets in the unoccupied unit. When asked if there was a binder, policy, logs, or a checklist to go over and review, MD Z was unsure.
At 1:50 PM on 7/31/23, the facility provided a policy entitled Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth and Spread, dated 7/10/23. A review of the policy found that it requires documentation to be performed in a preventative maintenance log when tasks are completed. The policy also states that monthly checklist would be developed in order to know what areas of the facility should routinely be drained (or flushed) and that unoccupied rooms would get flushed twice weekly.
At 2:38 PM on 7/31/23, observation of station one clean utility room found an old shower room that had been re-purposed over time to become a room for storage. At this time it was observed that the commode in the back corner of the room (behind a curtain and equipment) was found with little water in the bowl, indicating that the commode had not been flushed in weeks.
At 2:40 PM on 7/31/23, observation of station one soiled utility room found that the mop sink faucet over the hopper discharged brown water when turned on, indicating a minimal use fixture that is not being routinely flushed.
During a tour of Willowbrook, the unoccupied memory unit, at 3:02 PM on 7/31/23, with Assistant Maintenance Director AA, it was found that numerous resident rooms had fixtures that ran brown water during the first few seconds of flushing, indicating that these areas, that share the same water supply as the occupied portion of the building, are not being adequately protected with risk reducing measures.
No time during survey did the facility show or submit a completed risk assessment or a completed CDC tool-kit, both of which are used to identify risk areas and minimize the risk of contamination.
MINOR
(B)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the 5 day investigation to the State Agency for a facility reported incident in 2 residents (R19 and R38) out of 3 reviewed for abus...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the 5 day investigation to the State Agency for a facility reported incident in 2 residents (R19 and R38) out of 3 reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for further allegations of abuse to not be thoroughly investigated and/or reported to the State Agency timely.
Findings include:
Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed the resident was a female admitted with pertinent diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, delusional, anxiety, impulse disorder and dementia.
Review of medical record for Resident #38 revealed the resident was a female admitted with pertinent diagnoses of diabetes, macular degeneration (loss in the cent of the field of vision), anxiety, depression, heart failure, and sleep disorders.
Review of Incident submitted to the State Agency dated 7/11/23 at 11:23 AM, revealed, .Incident Summary: At approx both residents were in activity room. (Resident #19's) tweeter alarm sounded and resident tossed it towards (Resident #38). It landed on her and startled her. (Resident #19) was removed from the activity room away from other residents. Both residents were assessed for pain and injury no injury noted. (Resident #38) stated I'm fine it, just startled me, it was funny I thought it was a snake. When (Resident #19) asked why she did not answer. (Resident #19) was placed on 1:1 and assessed by (Name of Psychological Services) Services Social worker who was on campus at time. She is noted to be having increased delusions and hallucinations at this time. MD and family was notified. Granddaughter (Name of Granddaughter) is requesting to have resident seen at inpatient psychiatric services. Referral made as requested . Submitted by (Director of Nursing) B on 7/11/23.
In an interview on 08/01/23 at 4:03 PM, DON B reported she realized the final five-day investigation was not in the report when she went into the state system to submit for something else and saw that it was not completed.