JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC

24856 HOSPITAL DRIVE, REDLAKE, MN 56671 (218) 679-3400
Non profit - Other 47 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#43 of 337 in MN
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Jourdain Perpich Extended Care Facility has received a Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with top-tier quality. It ranks #43 out of 337 nursing homes in Minnesota, placing it in the top half, and is #1 out of 4 in Beltrami County, meaning it is the best option locally. The facility is newly inspected, so there is no trend data, but it has a strong staffing rating with only 11% turnover, well below the state average, and offers more RN coverage than 78% of facilities in Minnesota. Importantly, there have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign of compliance. However, a recent inspection found a concern regarding refrigerator temperatures not being properly monitored, which could potentially affect the safety of meals for residents. Overall, the facility shows many strengths but also has room for improvement in its kitchen safety practices.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Minnesota
#43/337
Top 12%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
11% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 37 points below Minnesota's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 102 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Minnesota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (11%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (11%)

    37 points below Minnesota average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Minnesota's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were maintained for 1 of 1 unit kitchenette refrigerator(s); and failed to ensure hairnets ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were maintained for 1 of 1 unit kitchenette refrigerator(s); and failed to ensure hairnets were worn effectively when preparing resident meals. This had the potential to affect 23 out of 23 residents who receive meals and snacks from the kitchen and refrigerator Findings include: UNIT REFRIGERATOR: On 1/24/24 at 11:59 a.m., DM-C identified the unit kitchenette refrigerator was stocked with snack food for all the residents. The night shift nursing staff were responsible to check the temperatures of the unit kitchenette refrigerator daily. The refrigerator was observed and contained included the following foods: turkey sandwiches, chocolate pudding made with milk, and an open bottle of hidden valley ranch dressing. The January 2024 fridge/freezer temperature monitoring log identified the unit kitchenette refrigerator temperatures ranged from 32 to 51 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and 12 of the 23 temperatures documented were at 42 degrees F and above. On 1/24/24 at 12:14 p.m., DM-C stated some of the temperature recordings of the unit kitchenette refrigerator were out of range. The temperatures should be between 33-41 degree's F. Storing food at temperatures above 41 degrees F may cause foodborne illness. The current temperature was 40 degree's F; however, DM-C placed a second internal thermometer in unit kitchenette refrigerator to double check the temperature, since there were so many recorded off temperatures. During observation on 1/24/24 at 12:57 p.m., both internal thermometers in unit kitchenette refrigerator read 50 degrees F. During observation on 1/24/24 at 1:48 p.m., both internal thermometers in unit kitchenette refrigerator read 50 degrees F. The facility policy Food Safety Requirements-Resources Information dated 3/4/17, identified a potential cause of foodborne illness was improper storage of food. All food storage refrigerators must be kept at or below 41 degrees F. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code dated 2022, identified foods requiring refrigeration should be at 41 degrees F or below to prevent food borne illness. HAIRNETS: During observation on 1/23/24 at 11:22 a.m., cook (C)-A was preparing food for lunch. C-A's hairnet was placed about 1.5 inches (in) behind their hairline and about 40 percent of C-A's hair was untucked at the back of hairnet. The untucked hair was hanging about 12 in. down C-A's back. During interview on 1/23/24 at 11:41 a.m., C-A stated she was aware her hair was hanging out of hairnet and that was how she usually wore her hairnet. During interview on 1/23/24 at 11:46 a.m., dietary manager (DM)-C stated she was aware C-A's hair was hanging out of hairnet. DM-C identified it was a long-standing issue and had previously discussed the concern with C-A and C-A's supervisor. On 1/24/24 at 7:12 a.m., C-A was observed preparing food for breakfast. C-A's hairnet was placed about 1 in. behind C-A's hairline and about 25 percent of C-A's hair was untucked at the back of the hairnet. The untucked hair was hanging about 12 in. down C-A's back. During interview on 1/24/24 at 7:17 a.m., cook supervisor (CS)-D stated hairnets were required when preparing and serving food and expected hairnets be worn effectively [all hair contained under the hairnet]. CS-D was aware C-A's hair was hanging out of hairnet and has spoken to C-A about wearing the hairnet effectively and it has been a long-standing issue. During interview on 1/24/24 at 11:10 a.m., DM-C stated it was important to wear a hairnet effectively to prevent food contamination. The facility policy Employee Sanitation Practices dated 3/4/17, identified all kitchen employees should wear hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code dated 2022, identified consumers are particularly sensitive to food contaminated by hair. Food employees should wear hair restraints effectively to keep hair from contacting exposed food to prevent food-borne illness.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Minnesota.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Minnesota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac Staffed?

CMS rates JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 11%, compared to the Minnesota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC during 2024. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac?

JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 47 certified beds and approximately 23 residents (about 49% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in REDLAKE, Minnesota.

How Does Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac Compare to Other Minnesota Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Minnesota, JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (11%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Minnesota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac Stick Around?

Staff at JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 11%, the facility is 35 percentage points below the Minnesota average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 20%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac Ever Fined?

JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Jourdain Perpich Ext Care Fac on Any Federal Watch List?

JOURDAIN PERPICH EXT CARE FAC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.