ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Arrington Living Center in Collins, Mississippi has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #97 out of 200 facilities in the state places them in the top half, but this is overshadowed by their poor overall performance. The facility's trend has been stable, with two major issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but these issues highlight serious care deficiencies. Staffing is a strength here, earning a 5/5 star rating with a turnover rate of 45%, which is better than the state average. However, recent inspections revealed serious incidents, such as a resident suffering a fractured femur due to improper transfer techniques and another resident sustaining an ankle fracture from not using the required lifting equipment, raising concerns about safety protocols. Despite having good RN coverage, the facility still faces significant challenges that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #97/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 45% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $22,632 in fines. Higher than 82% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Mississippi nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (45%)
3 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
May 2025
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) inappropriately transferred a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and submit Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe of no more than nin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention for a resident transfer with a stand mechanical lift, resulting...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards during a transfer when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) trans...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to wash a resident's hair, who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of two (2) residents r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sanitize a full body lift between use for two (2) of four (4) observations.
Findings Include:
A review of t...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0576
(Tag F0576)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays for two (2) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 45% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $22,632 in fines. Higher than 94% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (28/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Arrington Living Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Arrington Living Center Staffed?
CMS rates ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Arrington Living Center?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm, 3 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Arrington Living Center?
ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLLINS, Mississippi.
How Does Arrington Living Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Arrington Living Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Arrington Living Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Arrington Living Center Stick Around?
ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Arrington Living Center Ever Fined?
ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has been fined $22,632 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,305. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Arrington Living Center on Any Federal Watch List?
ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.