ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER

902 GERALD MCRANEY STREET, COLLINS, MS 39428 (601) 765-6711
Government - City/county 60 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
28/100
#97 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Arrington Living Center in Collins, Mississippi has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #97 out of 200 facilities in the state places them in the top half, but this is overshadowed by their poor overall performance. The facility's trend has been stable, with two major issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but these issues highlight serious care deficiencies. Staffing is a strength here, earning a 5/5 star rating with a turnover rate of 45%, which is better than the state average. However, recent inspections revealed serious incidents, such as a resident suffering a fractured femur due to improper transfer techniques and another resident sustaining an ankle fracture from not using the required lifting equipment, raising concerns about safety protocols. Despite having good RN coverage, the facility still faces significant challenges that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
28/100
In Mississippi
#97/200
Top 48%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
2 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
45% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$22,632 in fines. Higher than 82% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Mississippi nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (45%)

    3 points below Mississippi average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Mississippi average (2.6)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 45%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $22,632

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) inappropriately transferred a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) inappropriately transferred a dependent resident, resulting in a fractured femur for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for accidents, Resident #3. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 4/24/25, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) with measures put in place to correct the deficiency effective 4/25/25, prior to the State Agency (SA) entrance on 4/29/25. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised 10/10/2022, revealed, Policy: This facility's policy is to protect each resident's health, welfare, and rights by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect .Definitions .'Neglect' means the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress . A record review of the facility's investigation, dated 4/23/25, revealed that during the 3-11 PM shift on 4/23/25, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) noted Resident #3 had a swollen and painful left hip. The Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor assessed the resident and arranged for transfer to an acute care hospital. The facility was notified that Resident #3 had sustained a fracture. Upon reviewing security footage, the Administrator observed that Resident #3 was assisted with lunch, then later wheeled to her room by her daughter-in-law, who left the resident alone in the room in a geri-chair at 12:53 PM. The assigned CNA (CNA #1) later entered and exited the room between 1:13 PM and 1:18 PM. When questioned, the CNA admitted that no one assisted her with transferring Resident #3 and that she had transferred her by placing one arm under the legs and one under the arms. The CNA was immediately suspended pending the facility's investigation. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 9/29/17 with diagnoses including Sick Sinus Syndrome. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/11/25 revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Further review revealed Resident #3 was dependent upon staff for assistance with mobility including rolling left to right, moving from sitting to lying position, and getting in and out of the shower. A record review of the Emergency Department's Provider Notes, dated 4/24/25, revealed, .History .Nursing home reports that they noted that patient's left upper leg was swollen and appeared to be painful when they were changing her this evening .Left upper leg is swollen .X-ray hip - complete 2 views LT (Left) .Left hip arthroplasty with significantly displaced angulated overriding comminuted periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femoral shaft along the mid to distal aspect of the femoral stem component. Severe osteopenia. Soft tissue swelling . On 4/30/25 at 1:05 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained that an investigation was initiated after the night shift charge nurse notified her on 4/23/25 that the resident had a knot with bruising on the left hip and appeared to be in pain. The DON instructed staff to contact the nurse practitioner, who recommended sending the resident to the ED (Emergency Department). The DON stated the ED physician questioned the injury mechanism and referred the incident to the Attorney General's office. The DON and Administrator questioned CNA #1 on 4/24/25, and CNA #1 admitted to lifting the resident out of her chair and into bed by herself. The DON stated that CNA #1 should have either used the stand-and-pivot method or a mechanical lift with other staff assistance. She emphasized the expectation that staff follow safe transfer techniques to prevent resident injury. On 4/30/25 at 10:42 AM, during an interview with CNA #1, she stated that on 4/24/25 she lifted the resident from the chair to bed using one hand under the hips and the other under the back. She acknowledged that lifting the resident in that way was inappropriate but felt comfortable doing so because of the resident's small size and her own strength. CNA #1 acknowledged the risk of injury, including broken bones, from improper lifting. On 5/1/25 at 9:20 AM, during an interview with RN #1 (Care Plan/MDS Nurse), she explained CNAs are instructed to use a lift if they are uncomfortable transferring a resident. She confirmed that Resident #3 was recommended for one-person stand-and-pivot transfer at the time of the injury. On 5/1/25 at 9:39 AM, during an interview with the facility's Occupational Therapist, he stated that therapy last saw Resident #3 on 9/9/24 and recommended one-person maximal assistance with a stand-and-pivot method. He stated this method was safest and that improper lifting could result in residents having serious injuries or falls. On 5/1/25 at 10:26 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, she confirmed CNA #1 admitted to lifting the resident inappropriately. The Administrator stated she did not believe the act was malicious and CNA #1 had no prior disciplinary issues, but the CNA was placed on leave pending investigation and later terminated. On 5/1/25 at 12:40 PM, during an interview with Resident #3's Resident Representative (RR), she stated the resident had experienced a recent incident that resulted in a hip fracture. She stated the injury occurred when CNA #1 lifted the resident from a chair to bed. She added that on 4/30/25 at 9:35 AM, the Administrator informed her that CNA #1 admitted to lifting the resident inappropriately. On 5/8/25 at 9:50 AM, during a post-exit interview with the Administrator, she explained that at the time of the inappropriate transfer, Resident #3 had a lift pad under her in the geri-chair because staff earlier in the day had used a mechanical lift to transfer her. She stated that while the resident could typically perform a stand-and-pivot transfer with assistance, her condition varied day to day. The Administrator emphasized that the staff are expected to evaluate transfers and, if a resident appears too weak or unstable to complete a safe pivot, a mechanical lift must be used. She explained that this expectation was reinforced through immediate in-services and education following the incident, which applied not only to residents with established lift orders, but to any resident whose transfer needs may change based on their condition at the time. The facility submitted the following corrective action plan: 1. Address how corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) (CNA #1) in question was suspended on April 24, 2025, pending investigation completion. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to be terminated week of April 28, 2025, following completion of investigation. 2. Address how the facility will identify other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice. All residents using the lifts have the potential to be affected. 3. Address what measures will be put into place or systemic changes made to ensure that the deficient practice will not recur. An Emergency Quality Assurance meeting was called at 9:20 a.m. on April 24, 2025, to discuss injury to Resident. Read and sign immediate education was placed in the In-Service Binder by the Staff Educator on April 24, 2025, regarding: i. Lift Education - Patient Lifts Safety Guide ii. Policy and Procedure for Safe Lifting Program iii. Step-by-step Instructions to find lift orders in the kiosk for residents. iv. Policy and Procedure for Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation A 100% audit was conducted by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses of all residents using sit to stand or total lifts to verify sling sizes, care plans, lift evaluations, and orders were correct and accessible to staff through the Electronic Health Record kiosk. A 100% audit was conducted by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses of all residents diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis to review care plans. All Nurses and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) will complete one-on-one checkoffs on proper use of the lift beginning April 24, 2025, by Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse, Staff Educator, Registered Nurse Supervisors, or DON. All Nurses and CNAs will continue to complete skills checkoffs for sit to stand lift and total lift bi-annually and on hire. In addition to lift usage review in Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee, the committee will review any specific changes or needs for further education of staff beginning during the QAPI meeting on April 30, 2025, and continue for three months. Conducted a directed in-service on April 24, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. with consultant via Zoom on abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Recording of in-service was distributed by Remind to all staff unable to attend to watch prior to working next shift. 4. Indicate how the facility plans to monitor its performance to make sure that solutions are sustained. The facility must develop a plan for ensuring that correction is achieved and sustained. This plan must be implemented, and the corrective action evaluated for its effectiveness. The plan of correction is integrated into the quality assurance system. QA Nurse began spot rounds regarding proper use of lifts on April 24, 2025, and will continue every week for four weeks, then every month for three months, and then quarterly. Audit results will be reviewed by the OAPI Committee on April 30, 2025, and monthly for three months until such time consistent substantial compliance has been achieved as determined by the committee. 5. Indicate the date(s) the corrective action(s) will be completed. The corrective action will be completed by April 24, 2025, with audits to continue until substantial compliance is reached. Validation: The State Agency (SA) validated on 5/1/2025, through interview and record review that all corrective actions had been implemented as of 4/24/25, and measures put in place to correct the deficiency effective 4/25/25, prior to the SA's entrance on 4/29/25.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and submit Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe of no more than nin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and submit Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe of no more than ninety-two (92) days from the prior assessment for two (2) of nineteen (19) sampled residents, Resident #21 and Resident #42. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, MDS Assessments, revised 2/18/25, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a .standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity .Types of .Assessments .e. Quarterly Assessment - completed using an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) no >(greater than) 92 days from the most recent prior quarterly or comprehensive assessment . Resident #21 A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 3/19/24 with current diagnoses including Generalized Osteoarthritis. A record review of the electronic health record revealed on the MDS tab that Resident #21 had a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 3/24/25 with a status of Export Ready. Resident #42 A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #42 on 1/29/24 with current diagnoses including Hemiplegia. A record review of the electronic health record revealed on the MDS tab that Resident #42 had a Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 3/24/25 with a status of In Progress. On 5/1/25 at 11:49 AM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1/MDS nurse, she explained that the MDS department reviews every resident's MDS, and any issues are generally caught at that time. She confirmed that Resident #21's Quarterly MDS had been completed but not exported and was twenty-two (22) days overdue, and Resident #42's Quarterly MDS was in progress and was twenty-five (25) days overdue. She stated she was not sure how these were missed by the facility. On 5/1/25 at 1:25 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated she expected the MDS to be submitted on time.
Feb 2024 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention for a resident transfer with a stand mechanical lift, resulting...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention for a resident transfer with a stand mechanical lift, resulting in left ankle fractures for one (1) of three (3) resident care plans reviewed. Resident #1. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Plan of Care, revised 10/10/22, revealed POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to .implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .Policy explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe .a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . A record review of the Care Plan revealed Focus The resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit .Interventions .TRANSFER: The resident requires STAND lift X (times) 2 staff for transfers. Date initiated 1/10/24 . A record review of the facility's investigation, dated 1/18/24, revealed that on 1/17/2024, Resident #1 reported she had pain in her left foot and that her foot had hit something while she was being transferred from the wheelchair to the bed the prior afternoon (1/16/24). The resident received x-rays and upon obtaining the images, the Nurse Practitioner gave an order to transfer the resident to an acute hospital. Additional x-rays were obtained which revealed she had fractures. An investigation was completed, and it was found that CNA #4 was transferring Resident #1 and did not use a stand lift, which was what the resident required per her care plan. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/28/2011 with current diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Muscle Weakness. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. A record review of the Physician's Order Sheet, revealed Resident #1 had a Physician's Order, dated 1/10/24, for Stand lift x (times) 2 persons for transfers. A record review of the local hospital report, dated 1/17/24, revealed Resident #1 had an acute spiral fracture lateral malleolus (outside ankle) and an acute avulsion fracture medial malleolus (inner side of ankle). During an interview on 02/15/2024 at 09:25 AM, Resident #1 revealed a CNA came into the room and assisted her from the wheelchair to her bed and did not use any type of mechanical lift. During an interview on 02/15/2024 at 12:15 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed CNA #4 did not use the stand lift as was required per the Physician's Order and plan of care for Resident #1. He stated that he expected the staff to review the resident's care plan to ensure the resident was properly transferred. During an interview on 02/15/2024 at 12:30 PM, with the Administrator, she revealed the resident was not transferred appropriately per the care plan and Physician's Order. She stated that the facility conducted a thorough investigation and reported the fracture to the authorities as required. CNA #4 was placed on leave pending the investigation on 1/17/24 and was terminated on 1/18/24 because she did not come to Human Resources for a meeting as requested. The Administrator said that residents and other staff were interviewed and there were no other instances in which a resident was inappropriately transferred. The facility had an emergency Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 1/17/24 at 2:40 PM to discuss the injury to the resident. The facility's policies regarding mechanical lifts were reviewed during the QAPI meeting and there were no changes recommended to the current policy. The facility provided immediate education beginning 1/17/24 on Lift Education, Policy and Procedure for Safe Lifting Program, Step by step instruction to find lift orders in the kiosk for residents, and policy and procedure for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. She explained that a 100% audit was conducted of all residents using the stand and full body lifts to verify sling sizes, care plans and Physician Orders to ensure all were correct and accessible to staff through the electronic health records. All nurses and CNAs completed one-on-one checkoffs on the proper use of the lift beginning 1/17/24 and no staff were allowed to work until in-service training was completed. Lift skills checkoffs for nurses and CNAs will be completed bi-annually and upon hire. The QAPI committee will review lift usage and the need for further education of staff for the next three months. Based on implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. Validation: On 2/15/24, the State Agency (SA) validated the following: The SA validated through interviews and record review that the facility completed a thorough investigation and reported the event to the SA and the Attorney General's Office. The SA validated through staff interview and record review CNA #4 was suspended on 1/17/24 pending the facility's investigation and was terminated on 1/18/24. The SA validated through interviews and review of the QAPI sign in sheet the facility held a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 1/17/24 at 2:40 PM and the facility's policies regarding mechanical lifts were reviewed. The SA validated through staff interview and in-service sign in sheets that the facility provided immediate education beginning 1/17/24 on Lift Education, Policy and Procedure for Safe Lifting Program, Step by step instruction to find lift orders in the kiosk for residents, and policy and procedure for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. The SA validated through staff interview and record review the facility conducted a 100% audit of all residents using the stand and full body lifts to verify sling sizes, care plans and Physician Orders to ensure all were correct and accessible to staff through the electronic health records. The SA validated through staff interview and record review of competency checkoffs, that all nurses and CNAs completed one-on-one checkoffs on the proper use of the lift beginning 1/17/24 and no staff were allowed to work until in-service training was completed.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards during a transfer when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) trans...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents and/or hazards during a transfer when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transferred Resident #1 from the wheelchair to the bed without using the required stand mechanical lift, resulting in left ankle fractures for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accident/hazards. Resident #1. Based on the implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Safe Lifting Program, revised 09/22/2022 revealed, POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury . Compliance Guidelines .3. Mechanical lifting equipment or other approved transferring aids will be used based on the resident's needs .10. Two staff members must be utilized when transferring residents with a mechanical lift .13. Staff members are expected to maintain compliance with safe handling/transfer practices . A record review of the facility's investigation, dated 1/18/24, revealed that on 1/17/2024, Resident #1 reported she had pain in her left foot and that her foot had hit something while she was being transferred from the wheelchair to the bed the prior afternoon (1/16/24). The resident received x-rays and upon obtaining the images, the Nurse Practitioner gave an order to transfer the resident to an acute hospital. Additional x-rays were obtained which revealed she had fractures. An investigation was completed, and it was found that CNA #4 was transferring Resident #1 and did not use a stand lift, which was what the resident required per her care plan. A record review of the local hospital report, dated 1/17/24, revealed Resident #1 had an acute spiral fracture lateral malleolus (outside ankle) and an acute avulsion fracture medial malleolus (inner side of ankle). A record review of the Physician's Order Sheet, revealed Resident #1 had a Physician's Order, dated 1/10/24, for Stand lift x (times) 2 persons for transfers. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/28/2011 with current diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Muscle Weakness. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. On 02/15/2024 at 09:25 AM, an interview with Resident #1 revealed a CNA came into the room and assisted her from the wheelchair to her bed. She stated that she bumped her leg on something, but she did not report that her foot was hurt until the next morning. She said the nurse came and looked at her foot and then she was sent to the hospital. She confirmed the CNA transferred her by helping her to stand and did not use any type of mechanical lift. On 02/15/2024 at 10:30 AM, an interview with CNA #1 revealed there was information on the kiosk that indicated how a resident was to be transferred, including if a mechanical lift was required or how many staff were required to complete the transfer. On 02/15/2024 at 12:15 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed he assisted with the investigation in which CNA #4 transferred Resident #1 to the bed without using the mechanical lift. He acknowledged that CNA #4 did not use the stand lift as was required per the Physician's Order and plan of care for Resident #1. He stated that he expected the staff to review the resident's care plan to ensure the resident was properly transferred. On 02/15/2024 at 12:30 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed the resident was not transferred appropriately per the care plan and Physician's Order. She stated that the facility conducted a thorough investigation and reported the fracture to the authorities as required. CNA #4 was placed on leave pending the investigation on 1/17/24 and was terminated on 1/18/24 because she did not come to Human Resources for a meeting as requested. The Administrator said that residents and other staff were interviewed and there were no other instances in which a resident was inappropriately transferred. The facility had an emergency Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 1/17/24 at 2:40 PM to discuss the injury to the resident. The facility's policies regarding mechanical lifts were reviewed during the QAPI meeting and there were no changes recommended to the current policy. The facility provided immediate education beginning 1/17/24 on Lift Education, Policy and Procedure for Safe Lifting Program, Step by step instruction to find lift orders in the kiosk for residents, and policy and procedure for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. She explained that a 100% audit was conducted of all residents using the stand and full body lifts to verify sling sizes, care plans and Physician Orders to ensure all were correct and accessible to staff through the electronic health records. All nurses and CNAs completed one-on-one checkoffs on the proper use of the lift beginning 1/17/24 and no staff were allowed to work until in-service training was completed. Lift skills checkoffs for nurses and CNAs will be completed bi-annually and upon hire. The QAPI committee will review lift usage and the need for further education of staff for the next three months. Based on implementation of the facility's corrective actions on 1/17/24, the deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the facility was in compliance effective 1/18/24. Validation: On 2/15/24, the State Agency (SA) validated the following: The SA validated through interviews and record review that the facility completed a thorough investigation and reported the event to the SA and the Attorney General's Office. The SA validated through staff interview and record review CNA #4 was suspended on 1/17/24 pending the facility's investigation and was terminated on 1/18/24. The SA validated through interviews and review of the QAPI sign in sheet the facility held a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 1/17/24 at 2:40 PM and the facility's policies regarding mechanical lifts were reviewed. The SA validated through staff interview and in-service sign in sheets that the facility provided immediate education beginning 1/17/24 on Lift Education, Policy and Procedure for Safe Lifting Program, Step by step instruction to find lift orders in the kiosk for residents, and policy and procedure for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. The SA validated through staff interview and record review the facility conducted a 100% audit of all residents using the stand and full body lifts to verify sling sizes, care plans and Physician Orders to ensure all were correct and accessible to staff through the electronic health records. The SA validated through staff interview and record review of competency checkoffs, that all nurses and CNAs completed one-on-one checkoffs on the proper use of the lift beginning 1/17/24 and no staff were allowed to work until in-service training was completed.
Sept 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to wash a resident's hair, who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of two (2) residents r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to wash a resident's hair, who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident #17 Findings Include: On 09/12/22 at 9:21 AM, during an observation and interview with Resident #17 stated she gets a bath once a week. The resident's hair looked oily and unclean. Resident #17 states that she gets her hair washed sometimes. On 09/13/22 at 8:58 AM, in an observation and interview with Resident #17 said I have not had a bath this week. The resident's hair continues to look oily and unclean. On 09/14/22 at 3:30 PM, in an observation and interview with Resident #17 stated she still has not had a bath this week and has never refused one. The resident's hair continues to look oily and unclean. On 09/15/22 12:06 PM, in an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 she stated that a bed bath consists of head-to-toe bath, including washing the resident's hair. On 09/15/22 at 1:02 PM, in an interview with CNA #7 she confirmed that a bed bath consisted of the resident's whole body, including the hair. She verified that Resident #17's hair was oily. On 09/15/22 at 1:05 PM, in an interview with Resident # 17 she stated that her hair needs washing. Resident #17 commented that although she received a bath yesterday, the CNA did not wash her hair. On 09/15/22 at 1:07 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 she stated that Resident #17's hair usually does not look oily and that Resident #17's hair, Is a little oily. On 09/15/22 at 1:10 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she stated that Resident #17 just got off of non-weight bearing status this week and could now start receiving showers again. While the resident was on non-weight bearing status she had to receive bed baths. She said she had expected the CNAs to wash her hair when completing a bed bath because a bed bath included a head-to-toe bath. On 09/15/22 at 3:40 PM, in an interview with CNA #5, she stated that baths and showers are documented in the Activities Daily Living (ADL) section in the computer when it is completed. She confirmed that when a resident receives a bed bath, it should include the hair being washed every time, but admitted that she does not wash the resident's hair with every bed bath. CNA #5 said that she washes residents hair probably twice a week. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 11/13/18 with diagnoses including Presence of Right Artificial Hip Joint and Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, which indicated Resident #17 has moderate cognitive impairment. Section G indicated Resident #17 required one-person physical assistance with bathing. Record review of the Shower List revealed Resident #17 received a Bed Bath on 9/12/22 and 9/14/22. Record review of the Inservice Sign In Sheet revealed the facility provided training on ADL care from 4/26/22 through 4/28/22.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sanitize a full body lift between use for two (2) of four (4) observations. Findings Include: A review of t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to sanitize a full body lift between use for two (2) of four (4) observations. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions Infection Control, (undated), revealed, Policy: All staff are to assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be transmitted during the course of providing resident care services. Therefore, all staff shall adhere to 'Standard Precautions' to prevent the spread of infection Definitions: Standard Precautions represent the infection prevention measures that apply to all resident care, regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status of the resident, in any setting where healthcare is delivered . On 09/12/2022 at 09:00 AM, the State Agency (SA) observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 retrieve a full body lift directly from the hallway and take it into an unsampled resident's room on the 400 Hall. CNA #1 did not sanitize the lift before use. CNA #3 assisted CNA #1 with transferring the resident inside the resident's room. On 09/12/2022 at 09:19 AM, the SA observed CNA #1 pushing the full body lift out of the same unsampled resident's room and back into the hallway on 400 Hall. CNA #1 did not disinfect the lift after use. CNA #2 immediately retrieved the lift from the hallway and pushed it to the 300 Hall for CNA #4 to use. On 09/12/2022 at 09:34 AM, the SA observed CNA #4 pushing the lift inside the room of an unsampled resident room on the 300 Hall. CNA #4 was assisted in the room by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2. On 09/12/2022 at 09:40 AM, the SA conducted an interview with CNA #4, who stated that she did not clean the lift and that she did not know it was supposed to be cleaned. She stated that she more than likely had training on it but does not remember because she works PRN (as needed). On 09/12/2022 at 09:42 AM, the SA conducted an interview with LPN #2, who confirmed that she did not clean the lift, but has received training on infection control. On 09/12/2022 at 09:49 AM, the SA conducted an interview with CNA #1, who confirmed that she did not clean the lift and that she should have cleaned it. She stated that it is important to clean it because it can move one contamination from one resident to another resident. On 09/12/2022 at 09:55 AM, the SA conducted an interview with CNA #2, who stated that she was asked to bring the lift to CNA #4, so she grabbed it from the 400 Hall and brought it to the 300 Hall. She stated that she did nothing with it before or after that. On 09/12/2022 at 10:03 AM, the SA conducted an interview with CNA #3 who confirmed that she did not clean the lift and that cleaning the lift slipped her mind. She also confirmed that she was supposed to clean the lift. On 09/13/2022 at 09:14 AM, the SA conducted an interview with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IP) #1, who stated that the reason it is important to clean the equipment in-between use is to prevent the spread of infection. She confirmed that the lift should have been cleaned between usage and that staff had received training on that matter. On 09/13/22 at 10:36 AM, the SA conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), who confirmed that it is important to clean the equipment between use to cut down the spread of infection. She verified that the staff has had training and should have cleaned the lift. A record review of the Inservice Sign In Sheet revealed an inservice was conducted with the Topic: Prevention and Control of Infection Standard Precautions Covid 19 protocols with the Date listed as July Inservice All Staff. The inservice sheet included the signatures of CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #4, and LPN #2 which indicated they had received training on infection control.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0576 (Tag F0576)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays for two (2) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays for two (2) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #22. This had the potential to affect 59 residents. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Mail and Telephone Services with a revised date of 11/28/17 revealed Purpose: To facilitate communication between the residents and their significant others via telephone and mail services . On 09/14/22 at 10:11 AM, during the Resident Council meeting, Resident #22 stated that they do not get mail on the weekends. There is no one at the facility to go to the post office to get the mail on Saturday. Resident #22 stated that she has inquired about the mail in the past and nothing was done about it. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #22 was admitted by the facility on 4/18/16 with a diagnosis of Unspecified Osteoarthritis. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/11/22 revealed Resident #22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 09/14/22 at 10:35 AM, in an interview with Activities Director, stated that about a year ago, the residents agreed in a resident council meeting to only have their mail delivered Monday through Friday. She said the facility has a Post Office (PO) box and someone, usually the Administrator, must go to the post office to get the mail. She explained that neither herself nor the Administrator works on weekends, so the mail is not picked up at the PO box on Saturdays. On 09/15/22 at 1:38 PM, in an interview with Resident #1, she stated she does not get mail on Saturdays. She receives a lot of mail from family and friends, and also receives catalogs that she enjoys looking through. She would like to get mail on Saturdays. She regularly receives letters from her sister because it is the only way she can communicate with her. She stated that she had been told by the facility that she could not receive mail on Saturdays because no one is at the facility on weekends to get it. Resident #1 commented, I would be thankful if I could get my mail on Saturday. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #1 was admitted by the facility on 11/15/19 with a diagnosis of Essential (primary) Hypertension. Record review of the quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/30/22 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 09/15/22 at 2:35 PM, in an interview with the Administrator, she stated residents do not get mail on Saturday. Most of the facility's mail goes to the adjoined hospital's business office and no one is there to get the mail on Saturdays. She confirmed the facility also has a PO box that is checked Monday through Friday, but no one is at the facility to check it on Saturday. She stated that It is the resident's right to receive mail on the weekends.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 45% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $22,632 in fines. Higher than 94% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (28/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Arrington Living Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Arrington Living Center Staffed?

CMS rates ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Arrington Living Center?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm, 3 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Arrington Living Center?

ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLLINS, Mississippi.

How Does Arrington Living Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Arrington Living Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Arrington Living Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Arrington Living Center Stick Around?

ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Arrington Living Center Ever Fined?

ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER has been fined $22,632 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,305. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Arrington Living Center on Any Federal Watch List?

ARRINGTON LIVING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.