CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER

302 ALCORN DRIVE, CORINTH, MS 38834 (662) 286-2286
For profit - Limited Liability company 95 Beds NEXION HEALTH Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#152 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Cornerstone Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about care quality. Ranked #152 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, they are in the bottom half of state options, although they are the top choice in Alcorn County. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from four in 2024 to seven in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars, although the turnover rate of 58% is average for the state. However, the facility has a concerning $90,844 in fines, higher than 93% of Mississippi facilities, signaling serious compliance issues. Specific incidents raised during inspections include a resident choking three times due to the facility's failure to follow their care plan, resulting in hospitalization and a poor recovery prognosis. Additionally, a Certified Nursing Assistant threatened to hit a resident, indicating issues with staff conduct. While the facility has good staffing levels, these alarming incidents highlight serious weaknesses in resident safety and care.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Mississippi
#152/200
Bottom 24%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$90,844 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
32 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Mississippi average (2.6)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Mississippi avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $90,844

Well above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: NEXION HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Mississippi average of 48%

The Ugly 32 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening
Sept 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff and resident interview, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity and respect for three (3) of ten (1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff and resident interview, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity and respect for three (3) of ten (10) residents sampled. Resident #2, #4, and #5. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled, Statement of Resident Rights undated, revealed, If anyone hurts you, threatens to hurt you, neglects your care, takes your property, or violates your dignity, you have the right to file a complaint with the Facility Administrator . You have a right to: 4.be treated with courtesy, consideration, and respect.Resident #2An interview with Resident #2 Spouse/Resident Representative (RR) on 9/11/25 at 10:00 AM, revealed that she has some issues with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, she revealed she's rude and very snappy. She stated, My husband is here for therapy, and he deserves to be treated with kindness and respect like everyone else in this place. She stated that her daughter told her that she needed to report it, but she confirmed that she hasn't because I don't want anything to be taken out on my husband. The RR stated, Because if that happens, then they will see the bad side of me. The RR stated, I feel sorry for the patients who may not have a family member to stand up for them. The least that she (CNA #1) could do is be kind.Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 8/21/25 with medical diagnoses, which include Cerebral Infarction and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis.Record review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact.Resident #4An interview with Resident #4 on 9/11/25 at 10:25 AM, the resident stated, Everyone is nice here except one, and she's here working today. Resident #4 identified CNA #1 as the person that she is referring to and revealed, the lady from the therapy department came to see if I was ready for therapy the other day and I told her I'm waiting for my aide to come and get me ready. I put my call light on, and she (CNA #1) came in, and I told her I needed to get ready for therapy. I couldn't understand what she was saying because she was mumbling, but then she said Well, get your clothes ready, and she just walked out the door. Resident #4 stated, I can't get up and get my clothes ready; if I could, I wouldn't be here. She revealed she seldom does anything for me; she'll answer the call light, make a remark, and then leave, and someone else will have to come in to help me. She revealed I don't know why she acts that way to people, it may just be her personality, or maybe she's just not nice to anyone. She revealed she's not fearful of the aide, but stated that she is just not a nice person.The admission Record review revealed that the facility admitted Resident #4 on 4/7/21 with medical diagnoses, including Lack of Coordination and Need for assistance with personal care.Record review of Resident #4's MDS with an ARD of 7/30/25 revealed a BIMS score of 14, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #5During an interview on 9/11/25 at 10:30 AM, Resident #5 stated, Most of the employees here are nice, but there is one here today that's not kind. Resident #5 confirmed that she is here for therapy, and then she will go back home and confirmed that she doesn't have much longer to put up with her. Resident #5 confirmed that the aide hasn't done anything abusive to her, but she is just mean-acting, but she isn't going to stir anything up because I'm just waiting to get back home. The admission Record review revealed that the facility admitted Resident #5 on 9/5/25 with medical diagnoses, including Encounter for other Orthopedic Aftercare and Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Left Femur.Record review of Resident #5's MDS revealed a BIMS score of 12 on 9//8/25, which indicated the resident has moderate cognitive impairment.During an interview on 9/11/25 at 11:00 AM, State Agency (SA) observed two staff members sitting at the B-hall nursing unit. One staff member (CNA #2) was sitting at the desk, and another staff member (CNA #1) was sitting with her back to the SA and was observed with a hoodie over her head. SA inquired how many Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were working on that hallway and CNA #2 stated two. CNA #1 stated one and two and pointed to herself and CNA #2 in a gruff tone. SA asked their names, and CNA #2 gave her first and last names. When the SA asked CNA #1 her name, she answered her first and middle name. SA asked if her middle name was her last name, and CNA stated, No, rudely.During an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) and the Administrator (ADM) on 9/11/25 at 11:30 AM, the DON revealed that she was aware that the residents had complained about CNA #1 and her mannerisms and behaviors. They both confirmed that they had talked with CNA #1 about her tone with the residents and stated that It's just her personality and demeanor. The Administrator revealed we have both verbally spoken to her about her abrasiveness and tone multiple times. The DON acknowledged that CNA #1 had a Disciplinary Action Record completed on 3/26/25 because a grievance was filed stating the employee talks too fast and the residents cannot understand her and she is very short with residents. The DON and ADM both acknowledged that the residents in the facility have the right to be treated with respect and kindness and further revealed that if they had a loved one in their facility, they would not like someone to take care of them who is rude and short with them.An interview on 9/11/25 at 12:20 PM with an Anonymous Employee #1 revealed she had overheard CNA #1 being rude and not friendly to the residents. The employee confirmed that she tries to reassure the residents and to let them know it's okay and that I have reported it to the nursing supervisor. She revealed that the DON was aware of it too, but she did not know what had happened.An interview on 9/11/25 at 12:30 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed she had overheard the DON and Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) speaking with CNA #1 about her tone, which can be abrupt. RN #1 revealed she's not abusive, but it's just the way she talks to people and it's not okay.During an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed that it had been reported to her by another staff member that CNA #1 was a little aggressive and rude to the residents. She revealed she reported it to the DON. She revealed she has worked with CNA #1 in the past; she's loud and gruff, but I've never witnessed her abuse anyone. LPN #1 confirmed that each resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity.In an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:35 PM, Anonymous Employee #2 revealed that there is another staff member who is rude and hateful and she (CNA #3) works night shift on the B-Hall and is hateful and talks loudly to her residents. She revealed that CNA #3 just returned to work after being suspended for cussing in the hallway and being rude to other staff members.During an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:50 PM, Anonymous Employee #3 confirmed she witnessed CNA #3 cursing in the hallway on night and being loud toward a resident and a family member, and stated that it was reported it to the DON.Record review of CNA #3 Disciplinary Action Record dated August 29, 2025, revealed that she was terminated after investigation of cursing in the hallway, threatening to whip staff a**, and being rude to a resident. Record review of a typed letter dated August 29, 2025, and signed by the DON revealed, I received a call this morning from a family member stating that a CNA had been very rude to her and her mother . She said that the CNA had a nasty tone and was just rude. the CNA in question was yelling and cursing in the hallway last night and threating to whoop whoever took her supplies a** Record review of CNA #3 Disciplinary Action Record dated 11/30/24 and 12/1/24, Facts regarding incident: Unsampled resident reported CNA being loud and rude with him at night.In an interview on 9/11/25 at 3:10 PM, the DON acknowledged that there were complaints made to her regarding CNA #3 being rude to a resident, in front of the resident's family, and cursing loudly in the hallway. She confirmed CNA #3 had several previous written Disciplinary Actions for her rudeness. She revealed that we had suspended her and did an investigation for the August 28th occurrence and was informed by their corporate office that they could allow CNA #3 to return to work with a last and final warning and that they are monitoring her closely. During an interview on 9/11/25 at 3:25 PM, the Administrator stated each resident deserves to be treated with dignity and respect and live in a peaceful environment. He stated after listening to these concerns, the facility failed to honor these residents' rights.
Jan 2025 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Scre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) status change for a resident following an inpatient psychiatric hospital stay for one (1) of three (3) PASARRs reviewed. Resident # 57. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled PASRR Policy and Procedure with a revision date of 7/18/18 revealed, (Facility proper name) uses the most current version of PASRR Rules of the Mississippi Division of Medicaid: Administrative Code, Medicaid Title 23: Part 207, Chapter 1: Long Term Care Pre-admission Screening as they pertain to the Level 1 (PAS) and Level 2 (PASRR) long term care processes and procedures. Record review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism, Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar II Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent. Record review of Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of May 2, 2024, revealed under Section A2105. Discharge Status 07. Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (psychiatric hospital or unit) In an interview on 1/22/25 at 2:45 PM, the former Social Services Director revealed when Resident #57 went out for inpatient psychiatric treatment, she was responsible for completing the PASARRs. She confirmed she did not submit a new change of status form for a Level 2 PASARR because she thought that since the resident had a negative Level I Preadmission Screening (PAS), they were exempt from sending anything further for the resident. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator revealed that the purpose of the Level 2 evaluation is to ensure the residents get the proper psychiatric care they need. He revealed he was unaware that a change in status form was not completed for Resident #57 after her psychiatric hospital stay but confirmed that it should have been.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for residents that were de...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for residents that were dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene for five (5) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #15, Resident #31, Resident #55, Resident #67, and Resident #71. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, Person Centered with a revision date of 10/2022 revealed under, Policy Statement .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #15 Record review of Resident #15's Care Plan date initiated 12/27/24 revealed that she had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness and impaired mobility. Resident #15's interventions included that she required partial to moderate assistance by staff for personal hygiene and to offer assistance with any shaving needs. On 01/21/25 at 10:30 AM an observation and interview revealed Resident #15 with numerous scattered facial hairs that were approximately one-half inch long on her chin and upper lip. She stated she use to could take care of it herself, but not anymore. She admitted that no one had offered to shave or remove her facial hair since she had been there and stated, I've been here about a month. On 01/22/25 at 10:38 AM an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #1, confirmed the facial hair on Resident #15's chin and upper lip needed to be removed. She confirmed that shaving is part of grooming during their bath and since it was not done then her ADL care plan was not followed. Record review of Resident #15's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/23/24 and that she had diagnoses that included Other Fracture of Right Lower Leg, Unspecified Fall, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/24 under Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated that she had moderate cognitive deficits. Resident #71 Record review of Resident #71's Care Plan date initiated 12/11/24 revealed that he had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness and poor balance. Resident #71's interventions included that he required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene and to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. On 01/21/25 at 10:00 AM an observation and interview with Resident #71 revealed long, jagged fingernails that were approximately one-half to three-fourths inch long bilaterally. Resident #71 stated that his fingernails were too long. On 1/22/25 at 10:34 AM, an observation and interview with RN Supervisor #1 confirmed that Resident #71 had long jagged fingernails on both hands. She confirmed that the staff were supposed to take care of their fingernails on bath day and revealed that the residents' ADL care plan was not followed. Record review of Resident #71's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 and that he had diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #71's MDS with ARD of 12/16/24 under Section C revealed a BIMS Score of 11 which indicated that he had moderate cognitive deficits. Resident #31 Record review of Resident #31's Care plans revealed, Focus: I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Cerebral infarction, weakness, need for assistance with personal care .with interventions initiated on 03/11/2020 that included, Perform AM/PM care including oral care, peri-care, bathing, dressing, hygiene, shaving and nail care. On 1/21/25 at 10:05 AM an observation and interview revealed Resident #31's fingernails were long and jagged with a brown substance under every nail. The resident had facial hair that was approximately one inch long on his cheeks, chin, and above the resident's lip and admitted that he had tried to get someone to shave him, but they still have not. Resident #31 stated, I've been trying to get shaved, and I want it all shaved off. On 1/22/25 at 9:15 AM, an interview and observation CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #31 needed to be shaved, and his fingernails needed trimming. She admitted that nail care and shaving is part of grooming. A record review of Resident #31's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/25/2020 with diagnoses that included Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 11/29/24 revealed Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 06, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #55 Record review of Resident #55's Care plans revealed, Focus: I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t weakness, impaired mobility .with interventions initiated on 06/01/2023 that included Bathing/Showering: Check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. On 1/21/25 at 10:25 AM an observation and interview with Resident #55's, he stated he likes his fingernails short. An observation at this time revealed the resident's fingernails were all long and jagged. On 1/22/25 at 9:20 AM, an observation and interview CNA #2 confirmed that Resident #55's fingernails on both hands were too long. She revealed his fingernails should be taken care of when he gets his baths. A record review of Resident #55's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/31/2023 with diagnoses that included Pneumonia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 11/8/24, revealed Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #67 Record review of a care plan for Resident #67 titled, I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) impaired mobility, revealed Interventions: personal hygiene: I am totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. On 11/21/25 at 9:25 AM, an observation of Resident # 67 revealed the resident had a brown substance on every fingernail on the resident's right hand. On 1/22/25 at 9:40 AM, in an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 she confirmed there was a dried brown substance on each fingernail on Resident #67's right hand. She confirmed that Resident #67 had not received nail care and the resident's care plan had not been implemented. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #67 was admitted by the facility on 7/29/24 with a diagnosis of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Record review of Resident #67's MDS with an ARD of 11/05/24, revealed GG0130: Self Care : Personal Hygiene: coded 01 Dependent.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary services, to promote healing, and prevention of developing new pressure ulcer...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary services, to promote healing, and prevention of developing new pressure ulcers for (1) one of (3) three residents with wounds reviewed. (Resident #49) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, (Proper Name) Pressure Injury Prevention Program, with a revision date of 09/2024 revealed all residents will be assessed for the risk of pressure injury . specific interventions will be implemented to prevent the development of avoidable pressure injuries, or to treat new/existing pressure injuries. An observation on 1/21/25 at 9:15 AM revealed Resident #49 lying asleep in bed, an air-mattress control box was attached to the foot of the bed, with no lights on indicating the mattress was not on. An observation of the mattress revealed the resident was lying in the middle of the bed, with the mattress completely deflated and sunken in the middle. Review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #49 revealed an active order dated 7/12/23 for a low air loss mattress for pressure redistribution. An observation of Resident #49 on 1/21/25 at 11:20 AM, revealed the mattress remained sunken in the middle, with Resident #49 lying in the sunken area. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #4 was in the room preparing to get the resident out of bed. She revealed the air-mattress was sunken in the middle earlier in the morning before breakfast when she provided care to Resident #49 and admitted that she had not reported that to anyone. An observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 11:25 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed Resident #49's air-mattress control box was not on. LPN #1 pushed the buttons on the top of the air-mattress control box and stated she could not get the box to come on. LPN #1 touched the mattress and confirmed that it was deflated. She stated that the resident could develop worsening wounds or skin breakdown from lying on a deflated air mattress. In an observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 11:27 AM with the Maintenance Director, he confirmed Resident #49's air-mattress was deflated because the control box was cut off. He turned the box on, and it immediately came on and inflated the mattress. He then confirmed staff should check the air-mattress often to ensure it is on and functioning and report any concerns. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/22/25 at 9:48 AM confirmed that Resident #49 could develop worsening of wounds because of his small stature and lead to more skin breakdown from lying on a deflated air mattress. She then confirmed CNA #4 should have reported the mattress being deflated immediately when it was observed. Review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident # 49 on 4/13/22 with a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease. Record review of Resident # 49's Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/01/24, revealed Section M: 0300: Number of Stage 4 pressure ulcers coded as (1) one. Item M:1200 was coded as having a pressure reducing device for bed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely and securely stored for one (1) of three (3) survey ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely and securely stored for one (1) of three (3) survey days. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Storage of Medications with a reviewed date of July 2024, revealed, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. An observation and interview with Resident #72 on 01/21/25 at 9:35 AM, revealed him lying on his bed in his room and there were ten pills inside a medication cup placed on the top of his over bed table. Resident #72 revealed that the nurse brought his medicine in about five minutes ago and he asked her to leave it there, and he planned to take it in a few minutes. He revealed that the nurse had set the medicine down and left it and a cup of water for him to take it with. An observation and interview on 01/21/25 at 9:40 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed that there were ten pills in a medicine cup on Resident #72's over bed table. She revealed that she had just prepared his 9:00 AM medications and brought them to him. LPN #3 confirmed that she should have stayed in the room and watched him take the medications and not left them with him. She revealed that by leaving medications at the bedside, she would not know what medication the resident took and someone else could come in and take them. LPN #3 confirmed that she was supposed to watch the residents take their medicine and not leave them at the bedside. LPN #3 validated with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that those medications in the cup were the ones she had just prepared and brought in for Resident #72 to take. An observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #2 on 01/21/25 at 9:50 AM confirmed that it was against the facility policy to leave medications at a resident's bedside. She confirmed that there were ten pills in the medication cup left at Resident #72's bedside and that the nurses were supposed to watch the residents swallow the medications before they left the room. RN Supervisor #2 revealed that by leaving medications at the bedside, there was a risk of another resident taking the medications which could possibly be something they were not supposed to have. An interview on 01/22/25 at 2:00 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that medications should never be left at a resident's bedside. She revealed that someone else could have rolled in there and taken the medications while the resident was asleep. She went on to say that Resident #72 could have also put off taking them until later when other medications were due and received too much. The DON confirmed that LPN #3 should have watched the resident swallow the pills prior to leaving the room. Record review of Resident #72's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that on 01/21/25 at 9:00 AM, LPN #3 signed out ten medications for administration to Resident #72. Record review of Resident #72's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/18/24 and that he had diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/25/24 under Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated that he was cognitively intact.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, record review and facility policy review the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide personal hygiene for five (5) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #15, Resident #31, Resident #55, Resident #67, and Resident #71. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised March 2018, revealed, Policy Statement: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain grooming and hygiene needs Resident #15 An observation and interview on 01/21/25 at 10:30 AM, revealed Resident #15 sitting up on the side of her bed with facial hairs scatted over her chin and upper lip that was approximately one-half inch long. She stated that she use to be able to use tweezers when she was at home and kept her facial hair plucked. She revealed that her hair needed to be removed but she didn't have a way to do it, and no one had offered to shave or remove her facial hair since she had been there. She stated that she knew they get busy and probably forget about her but she didn't like to have hair on her face. An observation and interview on 01/22/25 at 10:30 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3, revealed that facial hair was supposed to be addressed during a resident's bath or shower time and as needed and confirmed that Resident #15 had scattered facial hair on her chin and upper lip. She admitted that most ladies do not want facial hair, and it should be removed unless they refuse. An interview on 01/22/25 at 10:38 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #1, confirmed the facial hair on Resident #15's chin and upper lip. She revealed that most ladies were concerned about their appearance and would want it removed. She confirmed that facial hair should be addressed and removed during the resident's bath or shower and as needed. Record review of Resident #15's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/23/24 and that she had diagnoses that included Other Fracture of Right Lower Leg, Unspecified Fall, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/24 under Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 11 which indicated that she had moderate cognitive deficits. Resident #71 An observation and interview with Resident #71 on 01/21/25 at 10:00 AM revealed him lying in bed with long, jagged fingernails on his bilateral hands and was approximately one-half to three-fourths long. Resident #71 stated that his fingernails were too long, and they had started to split and crack. He revealed that no one had offered to trim his fingernails since he came there and stated, I need them cut. An observation and interview with Resident #71 on 01/22/25 at 9:38 AM, revealed no change in the appearance of the resident's fingernails. He stated that he used to be able to take care of his own nails when he was home, but not anymore and he liked to keep his nails a lot shorter than they are now. An observation and interview on 01/22/25 at 10:24 AM with CNA #3, revealed that nail care was part of personal hygiene and should be looked at and taken care of every day and as needed. CNA #3 revealed that Resident #71's fingernails appeared like they had not been clipped in a while. An observation and interview with RN Supervisor #1 on 1/22/25 at 10:34 AM confirmed Resident #71's nails needed to be trimmed and stated that long jagged fingernails could cause scratches, skin tears and possible spread of infection. An interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/22/25 at 10:50 AM revealed that fingernails should be cleaned every day and facial hair should be addressed with the resident's bath or as needed. Record review of Resident #71's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 and that he had diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #71's MDS with an ARD of 12/16/24 under Section C revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated that he had moderate cognitive deficits. Resident #31 An observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 10:05 AM revealed Resident #31's bilateral fingernails were approximately one and one-half (1 ½) inches long and jagged past the tip of fingers; a brown substance was under each nail. Resident #31 revealed they need to be cut; they are too long. Facial hair was approximately one inch long and was noted on the cheeks, chin, and above the resident's lip. Resident #31 stated, I've been trying to get shaved, and I want it all shaved off. During a phone interview on 1/21/25 at 2:57 PM, Resident #31's Representative (RR) stated We had visited before and found him to have long fingernails and not be shaved. We have brought it to the staff's attention before. An observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 9:05 AM revealed that Resident #31 was lying in bed with no change in appearance from the prior day. Resident #31 again confirmed that he wants to be shaved, and his nails cut. In an interview and observation on 1/22/25 at 9:15 AM, CNA #1 confirmed Resident #31's nails were very long, and that he needed to be shaved and stated, I'm not sure when his nails or shaving has last been. She revealed the resident had refused to have his nails cut in the past, so she doesn't ask him anymore if he wants them to be done. During an observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 9:25 AM, the DON confirmed Resident #31's fingernails were long and jagged, with a brown substance under them and that he needed shaving. She stated that this is not how we operate. Regardless, if he has refused in the past, he should still be offered to have his nails cleaned and cut and his facial hair shaven, which is part of his daily grooming. A record review of Resident #31's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 11/29/24 revealed Resident #31 had a BIMS score of 06, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #55 An observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 10:25 AM revealed Resident #55's bilateral fingernails were approximately one-half (1/2) inch long and jagged past the tip of his fingers. Resident #55 revealed he likes them to be cut shorter and neater. An observation on 1/22/25 at 8:45 AM revealed Resident #55's fingernails remain one-half inch long and jagged past the tip of his fingers. An observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 9:20 AM, CNA #2 revealed she was assigned to Resident #55 today and confirmed that his fingernails on bilateral hands were long and jagged. She revealed his fingernails should be looked at every day when he gets either a bed bath or a shower and that they should be kept trimmed to prevent him from scratching himself and causing a skin tear. A record review of Resident #55's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Pneumonia, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 11/8/24, revealed Resident #55 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #67 An observation of Resident # 67 on 11/21/25 at 9:25 AM, revealed all the resident's fingernails on the right hand to have a dried dark brown substance surrounding the nail cuticles and under the nail beds. An observation on 11/21/25 at 1:45 PM, revealed Resident #67's fingernails to the right hand were still observed to have a dried dark brown substance surrounding the nail cuticles and under the nail beds. In an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 1/22/25 at 9:40 AM confirmed that Resident # 67's fingernails on the right hand had a dried dark brown substance around the nail cuticles and under the nail beds and it appeared to be feces. She then stated that Resident #67 had not received nail care or hand hygiene lately and confirmed that failing to perform hand hygiene and nail care could lead to infections. In an interview with CNA #4 on 1/22/25 at 9:45 AM, she revealed that Resident #67 was prone to playing in her stool and confirmed she had not made rounds on the resident and seen the condition of her nails this shift. In an interview with the DON on 1/22/25 at 9:49 AM, she confirmed that not performing nail care was an infection control concern. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #67 was admitted by the facility on 7/29/24 with a diagnosis of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Record review of Resident #67's MDS with an ARD of 11/5/24 revealed a BIMS score of 99 indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. Section GG revealed that Resident #67 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) for the 4th quarter (July 1 - September 30) in the fiscal ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) for the 4th quarter (July 1 - September 30) in the fiscal year (FY) 2024. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Direct-Care Information (Payroll-Based Journal), last reviewed 3/2023, revealed Policy Statement: Staffing and census information will be reported electronically to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) through the Payroll-Based Journal system in compliance with 6106 of the Affordable Care Act .2. Direct-care staffing information includes staff hired directly by the facility, those hired through an agency, and contract employees .10. Staffing data includes the number of hours worked each day by each staff member . Record review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report revealed that the facility triggered for low weekend staffing for the fourth quarter of 2024. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 1/22/25 at 3:12 PM, they revealed during the timeframe the facility triggered for low weekend staffing, the facility was having to use a lot of agency nursing staff. The DON and the Administrator both confirmed that some agency staff hours were not accurately submitted to the PBJ, resulting in the low weekend staffing being triggered.
Sept 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and com...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment, as evidenced by dirty wheelchairs for three (3) of four (4) residents sampled. Resident #2, #3, #4. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment with a reviewed date of 3/2023 revealed, Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard . A review of Anonymous Complaint #MS 26061 revealed Wheelchairs are not being cleaned. Resident #2 During an interview on 9/9/24 at 2:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 revealed that the night shift aides are responsible for cleaning the wheelchairs. They have an assignment sheet they are supposed to follow to ensure that all wheelchairs are cleaned. An observation and interview on 9/9/24 at 2:05 PM, revealed Resident #2's wheelchair had a thick gray substance on the frame and the spokes of the wheels. Resident #2 revealed she wasn't sure when her wheelchair was supposed to be cleaned, but it needed it. A record review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory failure with hypoxia, Unspecified Diastolic (Congestive) heart failure and Bacteremia. Record review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/01/24, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #3 An observation and interview on 9/9/2024 at 2:20 PM revealed Resident #3 sitting in his wheelchair, which was noted to have a dried, thick gray substance on its metal base. Resident #3 revealed, Yeah, my chair is dusty. It could use some cleaning. A record review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypercapnia, Unspecified Diastolic (Congestive) heart failure, and Unspecified Cirrhosis of Liver. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 08/14/24, revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #4 An observation and interview on 9/9/24 at 3:55 PM, revealed the wheels on Resident #4's wheelchair were cracked and the wheelchair was dirty, with a dark gray substance noted on the frame of the wheelchair and the spokes of the wheels. Resident #4 revealed she had a different wheelchair before she got this one, which was in worse condition. She revealed it needs to be cleaned and also fixed. A record review of Resident #4's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral infarction, Cerebrovascular disease, Hemiplegia, and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the right dominant side. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 08/02/24, revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. In an interview on 9/9/24 at 4:15 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the wheelchairs are supposed to be cleaned nightly by the CNAs. She revealed that there is an assignment list that they go by, but there is no sign-off sheet to document when it is being done. During an observation and interview on 9/9/24 at 4:55 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the wheelchairs for Residents #2, #3, and #4 were dirty and stated that some of the wheelchairs needed to be repaired as well.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident, family and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document a sum...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident, family and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document a summary of the resident's and family's grievances and any corrective actions and follow-up for the grievances for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for grievances. Resident #1. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy titled, Filing Grievances/Complaints with a revised date of 6/2024 revealed, .Our facility will assist residents, their representatives (Sponsors), other interested family members, or advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such request are made . 2. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally, in writing, or electronically and may be filed anonymously.7. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations .11. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint of behalf of the resident, will be informed verbally and in writing (if requested) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. Record review of Complaint Intake MS#25961 dated 07/24/24 revealed, We have had four (4) meetings with the Administrator over issues we have had over the last two (2) weeks. A record review of the facility Grievance Log, dated 3/1/2024 to 9/9/2024, revealed no grievances logged for Resident #1. During a phone interview on 9/9/24 at 1:20 PM, Resident #1's husband/Resident Representative (RR) revealed that he had six meetings with the administrator and stated we just got lip service, and nothing is ever resolved when we discussed issues. He revealed the complaints were about the resident being wet or dirty for long periods of time. He stated that the lady in therapy even went and got the administrator several times because my wife would be wet and needed to go to therapy. He revealed when she went to the hospital on 7/31/24, we did not go back to the facility. An interview on 9/9/24 at 2:48 PM the Director of Rehab (DOR) revealed she recalled a time when Resident #1 was first admitted that she went into the resident's room around 9:30 AM to get her for therapy and the resident told me that she needed to be changed first. The DOR confirmed that she had let nursing know and then talked to the administrator about it because I felt like we would have a complaint about it. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 3:55 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed that the family of Resident #1 had frequent complaints. She revealed that on one particular day, she went to the Director of Nurses (DON), and reported a concern voiced by Resident #1's husband about loud, disturbing voices outside of her room. An interview on 9/9/24 at 4:05 PM, the Administrator (ADM) revealed that he was the grievance officer and was aware of the concerns that the family of Resident #1 had voiced and felt like they had addressed them all. He revealed the family would come directly to talk to me about their concerns and that he did not do a formal grievance form and therefore failed to follow-up and ensure the issues were resolved with the RR. An interview on 9/9/24 at 4:15 PM the Director of Nurses (DON) revealed that Resident #1's family did have frequent complaints, she revealed that she felt like we were addressing the issues but confirmed that she had not filled out a proper grievance form and stated, she understands that it is crucial to make sure resident's complaints or grievances are handled in the proper manner and that follow-up is done. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diastolic (congestive) heart failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not check...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not check a resident every two hours for incontinence episodes for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with reviewed date of January 2023 revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan with an initiation date of 03/19/24, revealed Focus: I am incontinent of bladder .Interventions/Tasks .Check every two (2) hours and as required for incontinence On 04/15/24 at 10:50 AM, an observation revealed Resident #1 lying in his bed on his left side and there was a mild odor of urine noted in the room. His sheet was pulled down with his incontinent brief exposed. The brief was saggy and appeared to be wet. On 04/15/24 at 11:20 AM, an observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 performed wound care to Resident #1's right trochanter. LPN #1 pulled down Resident #1's incontinent brief to prepare for wound care and she confirmed that his incontinent brief was soaked with urine. Resident #1 revealed that he had not been changed since before breakfast. She revealed that the CNAs were supposed to make rounds on the residents every two hours. On 04/15/24 at 11:25 AM, an interview with CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #1 had not been changed since the last shift left at 7 AM that morning. On 04/15/24 at 11:45 AM, an interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed CNAs were supposed to round on residents every two hours and if the resident refused care, they were supposed to report this to the nurse. The ADON confirmed Resident #1 should be checked at least every two hours. On 04/15/24 at 2:00 PM, an interview with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, revealed that the purpose of the care plan was to identify the care that each resident needed so the staff would know essentially how to take care of the resident. She revealed that the care plan identified the problems and the conditions of the residents and put individualized interventions in place to follow for each resident. The MDS Nurse also revealed all residents should be checked on at least every two hours whether they were asleep or not and if they refused to be changed, they should be care planned for that as well. The MDS Nurse confirmed that if a resident was not checked on every two hours, the care plan was not followed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Livi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was completed on a dependent resident when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not check a resident every two hours for incontinent episodes and the resident was left wet for an undetermined amount of time for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018 revealed, . Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. During an observation on 04/15/24 at 10:50 AM, revealed Resident #1 lying in bed and there was a mild odor noted. His bed sheet was pulled down with his incontinent brief exposed and it was sagging and appeared to be wet. During an observation and interview on 04/15/24 at 11:20 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 gather supplies and perform wound care to Resident #1's right trochanter. There was a mild odor noted when LPN #1 unfastened the resident's incontinent brief. LPN #1 confirmed the mild odor, and stated, It smells like urine. LPN #1 pulled down Resident #1's incontinent brief to prepare for wound care and she confirmed that his brief was soaked with urine. Resident #1 stated that he had not been changed since before breakfast. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 11:25 AM, CNA #1 confirmed Resident #1 was assigned to her and she had not changed him yet because he was sleeping. CNA #1 confirmed that he had not been changed since the last shift left at 7 AM that morning. She revealed that she didn't get him up because he didn't like to be woken up. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 11:45 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed that CNAs were supposed to round on residents every two hours and if the resident refused care, they were supposed to report this to the nurse. She revealed that leaving a resident wet for extended periods could cause the wounds to get worse and could cause infection. The ADON revealed that Resident #1 was normally up and on the move but he still should be checked at least every two hours. She revealed that even if residents were sleeping, they were required to check and see if they needed to be changed. She revealed that it was unacceptable for a CNA to leave a resident for hours without checking on them and changing their brief. She revealed that they would educate and in-service about this. She stated, They can't not change them. She revealed that it was unacceptable for a CNA to leave a resident over four hours without checking on them and changing their brief. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 11:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed CNAs are required to check on residents every two hours that are incontinent and see if they needed changing. She revealed that CNA #1 should have rounded on Resident #1 and changed him even if he was asleep. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 3:09 PM, CNA #2 revealed that they were supposed to round on all residents every two hours and change them whether they were asleep or not because residents could be at risk for skin breakdown. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed that he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Huntington's Disease, Spina Bifida, Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer of Right Hip, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/24, Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 which indicated he had moderate cognitive deficits.
Nov 2023 9 deficiencies 4 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect as evidenced by: (1) the facility's failure to identify a resident choked on 6/17/23; failure to ensure the resident had supervision and was on a modified diet to prevent choking on 8/20/23; and failure on 10/25/23 to supervise and modify diet which lead to the resident again choking and requiring Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hospitalization with a poor recovery prognosis. Resident #13. (2) the facility's failure to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse as evidenced by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) threatening to hit a resident for Resident #46 for two (2) of three (3) allegations of abuse and neglect reviewed. The facility neglected to identify or investigate the choking incident on 06/17/23 with required hospitalization for three (3) days and removal of a food bolus from his oropharynx and failed to have knowledge of the 08/20/23 choking incident that required the Heimlich maneuver to remove the food bolus from his oropharynx in the facility. This neglect resulted in the resident not receiving services to possibly prevent choking episodes. The resident's diet was changed on 8/21/23 to Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) mechanical soft. The Administrator had the resident's diet changed on 8/31/23 to CCD with chopped meats and the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)were to chop the resident's meat when the tray was served. The meal tickets were never changed to include the CNA to chop meats. On 10/25/23 in the evening, Resident #13 was served an Italian Sausage link that was five (5) to six (6) 1½ inch chunks of meat and the resident was found in his bed, unable to breath and without a pulse or respirations. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was performed for over ten (10) minutes and was not successful. Resident #13 was transported to the local hospital where he remains on life support. The facility's negligence to identify the choking incidents and to ensure that staff were aware of the diet needs of Resident #13 and serve the correct diet order to a resident with a known history of choking in the facility and dysphagia resulted in Resident #13 choking on 10/25/23 and required life saving measures and remained in the hospital on the ventilator at the time of the survey. This negligence resulted in harm for Resident #13 and placed other residents at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment or death. The situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) that began on 6/17/23 when the first choking episode occurred and the facility failed to identify the event as choking. On 11/2/23 at 3:35 PM, the State Agency notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and SQC and provided the Administrator with the IJ templates. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 11/3/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed to remove the IJ on 11/3/23, and the IJ was removed on 11/4/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 11/06/23, prior to exit and the scope and severity for F600 was lowered to an E, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Resident #13 Record review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy with a revision date of 5/28/2021 revealed, INTENT: This protocol was intended to assist in the prevention of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse. POLICY: .2 .The facility will conduct an investigation of alleged or suspected abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property, and will provide notification of information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of, oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability .Neglect is defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness Record review revealed a facility-reportable incident (FRI) that had occurred on 10/25/23 at 7:42 PM, when Resident #13 was noted to be having an active seizure while eating supper in bed. A record review of the Unusual Incident .Staff reported at the supper time, resident was asleep and did not want supper. Night shift Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 reported that she had assisted the resident to the restroom, and he was eating his supper, while she was caring for roommate. She heard (Resident #13) making a noise, and he was found actively having a seizure. The nurse was called to the room and life-saving measures were began by nursing staff ending in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). The resident was transferred to the hospital. Staff called to check on resident condition on 10/26/23 and was informed that a piece of sausage was extracted from the resident's oropharynx prior to resident being intubated. Medical records were obtained from (hospital) on 10/26/23 and received at 2:33 PM. Resident was intubated and noted to have Pneumonitis on 10/26/23. After investigation, resident had a witnessed seizure causing aspiration of food content. I cannot substantiate abuse or neglect. This investigation was not dated but signed by the Administrator. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 10/25/23 at 19:42 (7:42 PM) revealed, Nurse was alerted by CNA that I was needed in resident's room. Upon arriving in room resident appeared to be having seizure activity. Pulse was faint and respirations noted. Resident had foamy secretions coming from mouth. Resident was pale in color . CNA told this nurse that prior to her alerting me he had been eating . This nurse performed back thrust times 5 and was in process of performing ABD (abdominal) thrust when other help arrived. Thrust was ineffective. Nurse left room and got crash cart and upon returning CPR was in process related to no pulse or respirations. Progress note for 10/25/23 at 19:45 (7:45 PM) Nurse observed resident unresponsive, pale and foaming at the mouth. Nurse called 911 and returned to aid with chest compression until EMS arrived. Record review of the local hospital emergency room report dated 10/25/23 stated, History of Present Illness .Per ambulance run report: Patient was found lying supine in bed upon arrival; nursing home staff stated that the patient was found unresponsive and cyanotic immediately after mealtime. Per ED (Emergency Department) sign out: Patient was exhibiting agonal breathing; a piece of sausage was extracted from his oropharynx prior to intubation . Problem List Plan: . Respiratory: Patient ' s acidosis and elevated lactate is likely attributed to airway obstruction caused by food getting stuck in his oropharynx; although there is clinical and radiographic evidence concerning for potential aspiration pneumonia .Infectious Disease: Radiographic and clinical suspicion for aspiration pneumonia . Feeding: Feeding tube inserted .CPR Exam: Narrative: .Respiratory: Decreased air entry throughout, stridorous respirations, significant accessory muscle use, saturating 49% on nonrebreather .On arrival, it immediately became apparent that the patient was in profound respiratory distress and needed emergent airway management. During the intubation, we visualized a very large piece of food obstructing the patient's airway, using forceps, and removed the foreign body. After the patient was intubated and sedated and placed on the ventilator, his vital signs normalized . An interview on 10/31/23 at 12:50 PM, CNA # 2 revealed on 10/25/23 she was passing the dinner trays and went into Resident #13's room and he was asleep, which is not uncommon for him, she revealed a lot of times he would wake up later and eat. She stated she tried to wake him, and he said he wasn't hungry and covered his head up. She sat the tray down on his side table and never uncovered it. She stated when she came back to work the next day, she found out that Resident #13 had choked. We were told to make sure we chopped his meats from now on. She confirmed she had never been in-serviced on how to chop the resident's meats before and wasn't aware that he was supposed to have his meats chopped because the diet ticket never said to chop his meats. An interview on 10/31/23 at 1:40 PM, with CNA #7 revealed the resident is a heavy eater and snacks in his room all the time. She revealed the day before he choked on 10/25/23, he had a whole piece of chicken that was served on his meal tray. She revealed we never cut his meat up before and the resident can eat by himself, and we don't stay in the room with him while he is eating. An interview on 11/01/23 at 8:10 AM, CNA #8 revealed she was never aware that the resident required his meats to be chopped before he choked on 10/25/23. She revealed we were told after he choked that we needed to make sure and chop his meats, but not before. An interview on 11/01/23 at 8:25 AM with the dietary management group Account Manager revealed she has been at the facility for about two months and stated that when she started, she was told anyone with a chopped meats diet we were to put a whole piece of meat on the plate and put a knife on the tray so that the CNA could cut up the meat. She revealed this was the only place she had ever worked that I had heard that a CNA would cut the meat up. She stated on 10/25/23 she was in the kitchen but didn't cook the dinner meal but did observe the meal which consisted of Italian sausage that was cut into about one (1) to one and one-half (1 ½) inch chunks and each resident got about three or four chunks of the meat on their tray. An interview on 11/01/23 at 8:50 AM with CNA #6 revealed that she was working the night of 10/25/23 and went into Resident #13's room at about 7:15 PM to get his vital signs. She stated he was asleep, and she woke him up and took his vital signs and temperature. The resident said he had to go to the bathroom, and he was hungry. I assisted him to the bathroom and then set up his tray which consisted of noodles, round Polish sausage there were about four large round pieces about ½ inch to one inch long on his tray, and broccoli florets. She revealed she did not cut the sausage up because she was not aware that he required his meat to be chopped or cut. She revealed I went and started getting his roommate's vital signs and then she heard Resident #13 make a sound I never had heard before, she stated she thought he was having a seizure because he had fallen back on his bedrail and was foaming out of the mouth. I went for help immediately. She revealed on his plate he had eaten all the sausages and maybe one of the broccoli florets. She stated that after this incident we were in-serviced to make sure to look on the meal ticket and that CNAs were responsible for chopping meat for residents requiring chopped meats. We were also in-serviced on neglect and abuse. She confirmed before the choking incident they were not told to cut the residents' meats up. She stated she had worked here for about a year and had never been told to chop his meats before and hadn't seen his meats chopped up. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator (ADM) revealed Speech Therapy had ordered a chopped meats diet in August because the resident had a choking episode. She revealed the Dietary Director of Operations told her they were not able to do a chopped meats diet. She revealed we immediately in-serviced the staff that the kitchen would send out the appropriate knife and they would have to chop the meats. She stated, I did not feel comfortable with my staff cutting the meats, but I was told by the Dietary Director of Operations that it was a facility policy but since then I found out that was not true. She confirmed that she found out that was not true through the Corporate Chief Operating Officer (COO) and stated, I didn't say anything to the Dietary Director of Operations after that because that's a corporate-level issue and I was letting them handle it. She stated, I could make it happen today to stop all chop meats and just do a Mechanical soft. I haven't done it yet because Corporate had been working with the dietary management company about the issue. She revealed that since the incident happened on 10/25/23 with Resident #13 the aides are still chopping meat for the residents and stated that we keep a list of residents who require chopped meats at the nurse's station. The Administrator confirmed when she found out on 10/26/23 that the resident had choked, she had not done anything different with the chopped meat diets because corporate was working on that. An interview on 11/01/23 at 10:05 AM with the Director of Operations (DO) for the dietary services management group revealed that dietary services has three diets which are Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed. He stated that Resident #13 was put on a chopped meat diet on 08/21/23, because he had a choking episode. He confirmed that he had asked the Administrator for a diet clarification because dietary does not historically do chopped meats, but could do mechanical soft, and he was told by the Administrator to send out a knife for the residents who were on a chopped meat diet and the aides would chop the meats. He confirmed that this occurred on the Thursday before Labor Day, which would have been 08/31/23. The Director of Operations for Dietary revealed he is over 23 buildings, and this is the only building where they are doing chopped meats and requiring aides to chop the meat when it gets to the resident. He stated, I don't like doing that, but I couldn't get the Administrator to understand that chopped meats is a mechanical soft diet, I just needed them to get the order clarified. An interview on 11/01/2023 at 12:55 PM with the Nurse Consultant, Director of Nurses (DON), and Administrator revealed they were not aware of the choking episode on 6/17/2023. The DON and Nurse Consultant revealed they were not aware of a choking episode on 8/20/23. The Administrator revealed she was aware of the 8/20/23 choking episode and had a conversation with the Dietary because Speech Therapy had evaluated Resident #13 and requested a chopped meat diet. An interview on 11/01/23 at 2:05 PM, with CNA #7 revealed she never saw on the electronic charting guide for Resident #13 that the CNA was to chop meats. She revealed, our tablets are how we know how to chart for the residents and what they are supposed to get. An interview on 11/01/23 at 2:15 PM with CNA #4 revealed, I've never seen chopped meats listed on the tablets that we use to document. An interview on 11/01/23 at 2:25 PM, the Speech Therapist (ST) confirmed Resident #13 was on caseload for dysphagia beginning June 2023 through August 2023 and then again up until he was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. She revealed the recommendations were for him to be supervised for meals. He was at risk of aspiration because he wanted to lie down and eat. She revealed she would always caution Resident #13 about sitting up and eating and not lying down to eat. An interview on 11/01/23 at 2:35 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse updated the care plan on 8/25/23 to be up in w/c for all meals and stated that she put it in there when he had his quarterly MDS. She revealed I think we also may have talked about it in the morning meeting, but I'm not sure. An interview on 11/01/23 at 2:45 PM, the Medical Records Nurse revealed that when a resident comes back from the hospital the hospital directly uploads any paperwork into our system. She revealed the hospital will notify the Social Worker (SW) that they are uploading paperwork from the residents' hospital stay. She confirmed we usually review the paperwork in our standup meeting the next day or our clinical standards meeting on Friday. She confirmed for those meetings the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), MDS nurse, Treatment Nurse, Social Worker, and Administrator are in attendance. She stated, I don't know what happened in June when Resident #13 went out to the hospital and when he returned the discharge paperwork revealed he had choked and confirmed that she had apparently overlooked it. A phone interview on 11/01/23 at 3:30 PM with the Medical Director revealed, As far as I know he never had any seizures. He stated he had access to the hospital records and according to the hospital records they are currently treating Resident #13 for pneumonia and encephalopathy and the family is there, and they are talking about putting him on hospice because the prognosis is very poor. An interview on 11/01/23 at 4:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed on 8/20/23 was the Nurse Supervisor; she stated the floor nurse hollered for me and said she had done the Heimlich maneuver on Resident #13 and was able to get the food expelled. She revealed we called the doctor to see if there was anything he wanted us to do, and she revealed he wanted us to watch for any signs or symptoms of possible aspiration. She stated they put in a diet order change the next day for chopped meats and confirmed the order put in for care plans for him to be set up in the wheelchair was due to the choking episode on 8/20/23. She revealed she was unaware of the choking episode for Resident #13 in June and stated we have a daily stand-up meeting where all disciplines attend including the Administrator, DON, and ADON. She confirmed I'm not sure if it was discussed in the morning stand-up meeting or the clinical standards meeting about him choking on 8/20/23 but all the nursing knew about it and his care plan to be up in his wheelchair for all meals. An interview on 11/01/23 at 4:10 PM, with the Administrator revealed for the incident on 10/25/23 she was not made aware that Resident #13 was eating dinner until the next day on 10/26/23 around lunch time. She confirmed the nurse told her that he had a seizure and they had to do CPR and he was sent to the hospital. She had seen the hospital paperwork on 10/26/23 that revealed he had the sausage in his oropharynx and revealed for the August 20th incident the staff nurses just reported that he got strangled on his food and that's when he got the order for speech therapy to be evaluated. She confirmed she wasn't aware that Resident #13 required the Heimlich maneuver at that time. An interview at the same time with the DON revealed for the 8/20/23 incident she was made aware that the resident had trouble with taking his medicines and wasn't made aware of him choking. She revealed she is going to start going back and reading the nurse's notes each day so she will know what is going on. She revealed it usually will come out on the 24-hour nurses report and we will discuss it in the morning meeting. The DON and Administrator both revealed they were not sure how the choking episodes got missed. The DON confirmed after the 10/25/23 incident she instructed Resident #13's care plan to be updated to make sure CNA to chop meats was reflected on his meal tickets and that she was the one that put it on his 10/25/23 meal ticket for CNA to chop meats, and confirmed that it was not on there for the CNA to see that day. She confirmed it was not on the care plan before 10/25/23 and it should have been. She confirmed again that she was not aware of Resident #13 having a choking episode in June or August and that she wasn't aware that he had choked on 10/25/23 until the afternoon on 10/26/23. A phone interview on 11/01/23 at 4:25 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 confirmed she was working the night shift on 10/25/23 and that the CNA came and said she needed a nurse in Resident #13's room. She revealed the CNA said she thought he was having a seizure because he had foam coming out of his mouth. I took off to the room and when I entered it appeared that Resident #13 was having seizure activity. I put him in a recovery position on the right side and the CNA said he had been sitting up eating so I thought at that time that he was probably choking. She confirmed I did five thrusts to the back, and when I went to turn him over to do the abdominal thrust other help had arrived in the room and he was not breathing. I went and got the crash cart at that time and when I returned to the room CPR was in process. She revealed when EMS arrived, I told them he was having seizure-like activity. She revealed I had never worked with Resident #13 but had heard reports that he had choked before. She confirmed another nurse was on the phone with the DON at that time. And had notified her. I knew that he was on a chopped meats diet but there was no residue of any meat on the plate at that time, just some broccoli. An interview on 11/02/23 at 8:30 AM, the DON stated regarding the incident on 10/25/23, the nurse let me know that night that she thought he was having a seizure and revealed she did not instruct the night shift staff to start an investigation because she thought it was a seizure. She revealed that they didn't have stand-up the next morning, I can't remember why we didn't have it, but I was informed around one or one-thirty that day when we were having a party, when a staff member said they had called over to the ER and had been told that he had something in his throat when they tried to intubate him. She stated that's when we called over and got the medical records. She stated at that time they had started an investigation, but she still wasn't aware of the June and August incidents of choking until the SA told me on 11/01/23that it was located in the medical records and nurses' notes. The DON revealed the staff called her back that night and said the resident was being admitted and had to be intubated. The DON confirmed that she didn't thoroughly investigate the choking because I thought it was a seizure. She revealed that any resident sent out to the hospital, the staff will have to notify the DON or the Administrator right away. An interview on 11/02/23 at 10:00 AM, the Social Worker stated she was aware that he had choking episodes before the recent one on 10/25/23 but could not remember specific dates. She confirmed in the morning meeting we discuss any major issues and choking is an important issue. She revealed the morning meeting is made up of all department heads, which also includes the Administrator and DON. An interview on 11/02/23 at 10:40 AM, the ADON revealed she did an in-service on 8/31/2023 for the CNAs and nursing staff regarding chopped meats. She confirmed the in-service was not attended by all nursing staff including CNA #2 and CNA #6. She revealed that the 7 PM -7 AM shift did not get in-serviced on chopping meats because the meal trays are sent out on the day shift not the night shift. She confirmed that she did not demonstrate how to chop the meat to the in-service staff and that not all staff were in-serviced. An interview on 11/02/23 at 10:50 AM, the Administrator revealed the Registered Dietitian (RD) consult record is made up by the nursing department and given to the RD each week when she comes. She revealed the residents on the consult record and the residents that have had any significant changes are usually listed on the record to be seen that week. She confirmed that Resident #13 had never been put on the list for the RD to see after the choking episodes. Record review of Resident #13's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Dysphagia, Altered Mental Status, and Unspecified Dementia. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/25/23, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment further indicated under Section GG that Resident #13 required for eating, supervision, or touching assistance- Helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. The assessment further indicated under Section K that Resident #13 had coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medication and complaints of difficulty or pain with swallowing. Record review of the local hospital emergency room Report dated 6/17/23 revealed chief complaint: Altered Mental Status. Rehab facility was contacted for further information regarding patient's presentation, and they reported that patient had abnormal moaning and jerking-like motions, and that staff had concerns for new onset seizure-like activity. Per chart review, patient has no prior history of seizures but does have a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) involving left middle cerebral artery. At the time of my exam, it was noted that a patient had a golf ball sized food bolus extracted from posterior oropharynx. A record review of Progress notes dated 6/20/23 by the Medical Records Nurse, Note Text: Resident discussed in clinical standards, return from hospital on 6/20/23, continues all meds as ordered, new med of levetiracetam 500 mg bid for seizures, alert with periods of confusion, up with assist, CCD diet, will monitor. Record review of Progress notes dated 08/20/23 at 18:20 PM, stated, Resident noted with choking episode this shift at dinner time. LPN reporting that the resident had gotten choked on a piece of meat off his dinner tray. LPN assist resident with dislodging piece of meat. Resident's color returning to normal with O2 (oxygen) saturation of 97% on RA (room air). Resident cont. (continues) to be noted with a cough. Record review of Progress Note dated 08/21/23 at 13:48 PM stated, It was reported to ST (Speech Therapy) that the pt got choked while eating meat the previous day. Also nurse reports pt had difficulty while taking meds today. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 08/23/23 at 10:16 AM stated, Resident is to be gotten up for meals in W/C (wheelchair). Record review of the Diet Requisition Form diet change dated 8/21/23 revealed Resident #13 was changed to a Mechanical soft chopped meat texture diet. Record review meal ticket dated 08/31/23 at 2:34 PM diet order was changed to Chopped Meats; Knife and resident was served whole meats with a knife to cut. Record review of the Order Summary Report Active Orders as of 8/31/23 revealed an order dated 8/21/23, CCD Diet, Chopped Meat texture, thin consistency. Record review of Resident #13's meal ticket dated 8/30/23 all meals CCD-Mechanical Soft. Review of the Dinner meal ticket revealed- Ground Italian Sausage, brown gravy, parmesan noodles, broccoli florets chopped and sliced pears. The same meal was served on 10/25/23 the evening that the resident choked, and review of the dinner meal ticket revealed, Italian Sausage, Parmesan noodles, Broccoli florets, sliced pears . knife .CNA will cut meat Resident #46 An interview with the Administrator on 10/30/23 at 10:55 AM, revealed on 10/20/23, there was a witnessed verbal abuse incident of Resident #46 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1. She revealed CNA #1 admitted that she threatened to hit Resident #46 and she was terminated for verbal abuse. The Administrator revealed this incident was reported to the State Agency (SA) and other entities and an investigation was completed. During a phone interview on 10/31/23 at 8:05 AM, Resident #46's brother, his Resident Representative (RR), revealed the facility notified him that CNA #1 threatened to hit his brother and that she was terminated for this. During a phone interview on 10/31/23 at 4:10 PM, CNA #1 revealed Resident #46 was upset and angry and was swinging his arms and trying to hit her. She stated she did not threaten the resident she was going to hit him, but told him, Don't hit people. They are going to want to hit you back. She stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 yelled at her to not talk to residents that way and she then told LPN #1 that if someone hit you, you would want to hit them back. When asked about her written statement, Don't hit me if you hit me I'm going to hit you back, she stated she did write that in her statement and that was what happened, but she did not mean she was going to hit him, she just wanted him to know that he could get hit back if he hit another resident or any other person. When asked if the statement she wrote at the time of the incident was accurate, she confirmed that what she wrote was what happened. She stated, It's fine, I just want to get this over with. She stated she was fired because of this incident. She verified she had been in-serviced on abuse and neglect. During a phone interview on 10/31/23 at 4:30 PM, LPN #1 revealed she was working on the medication cart at the nurse's station, and she saw CNA #1 pushing Resident #46 in his wheelchair and she heard CNA #1 tell the resident, If you hit me, I am going to hit your ass back. She said she confronted the CNA and told her she could not talk to the resident that way and she told me that if nobody does anything about him hitting, then I can tell him that. She stated, I was actually offended hearing her talk to the resident that way and any other resident or family overhearing this would also have been offended. She confirmed this was abusive towards the resident and she reported it immediately. On 10/31/23 at 5:00 PM, during a phone interview, CNA #2 revealed she was a Nurse's Aide when this incident occurred, and since she was not certified, she was working with CNA #1. She stated the resident was in his wheelchair and was trying to get out of the chair, so CNA #1 went to him to take him to the nurse's station. She stated Resident #46 was angry and swung his arms and CNA #1 told him that if he hit her, she was going to hit him back. She stated she told CNA #1 to calm down and that it was not the resident's fault, but CNA #1 responded with Resident #46 should not hit people or he would get hit back. CNA #2 stated LPN #1 was at the nurse's station and heard what was said and reported the incident. She stated she gave her statement during the investigation. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/2/23 at 9:50 AM, it was revealed that an allegation of verbal abuse of Resident #46 by CNA #1 was reported. She stated this was reported and CNA #1 was told to leave the facility immediately and an investigation was done. She stated CNA #1 was terminated due to her confession and the results of the investigation. The DON confirmed the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse by a staff member. An interview with the Administrator on 11/2/23 at 9:51 AM, revealed that CNA #1 admitted that she told Resident #46 that if he hit her, she would hit him back and she also wrote a statement that verified what occurred during this incident. She stated when this allegation of abuse was made, the facility reported this to the State Agency, Attorney General's office, and to the local police department and CNA #1 was suspended and then terminated. The Administrator confirmed the facility failed to ensure that Resident #46 was free from verbal abuse by a staff member and abuse towards any resident was not acceptable. Record review of CNA #1's statement dated 10/20/23 revealed, Don't hit me if you hit me, I'm going to hit you back. He was swinging and [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan for for two (2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan for for two (2) of 18 care plans reviewed as evidenced by (1) the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a resident with a history of choking on 6/17/23 and 8/20/23 resulting in the resident experiencing a choking episode on 10/25/23 which required Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and hospitalization with a poor recovery prognosis. Resident #13. (2) the facility also failed to implement a care plan regarding shaving and nail care for a resident that required assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) for Resident #30. The facility failed to implement care plans for Resident #13 following a choking incident on 06/17/23 with required hospitalization for three (3) days and removal of a food bolus from his oropharynx and on 08/20/23 choking incident that required the Heimlich maneuver to remove the food bolus from his oropharynx in the facility. This failure to implement a care plan resulted in the resident not receiving services to prevent choking episodes. The resident's diet was changed on 8/21/23 to Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) mechanical soft. The resident's diet changed on 8/31/23 to CCD with chopped meats and the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were to chop the resident's meat when the tray was served. The meal tickets were never changed to include the CNA to chop meats. On 10/25/23 in the evening, Resident #13 was served an Italian Sausage link that was five (5) to six (6) 1 ½ inch chunks of meat and the resident was found in his bed, unable to breath and without a pulse or respirations. The facility performed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for approximately ten (10) minutes and Resident #13 was transported to the local hospital where he remained on life support. The facilities failure to implement the care plan to sit up at meals, supervision, and to serve the correct diet order to a resident with a known history of choking in the facility and dysphagia resulted in Resident #13 choking on 10/25/23 and required life saving measures and remained in the hospital on the ventilator at the time of the survey. This failure resulted in harm for Resident #13 and placed other residents at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment or death. The situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 6/17/23, when the facility failed to implement care plans for a resident with dyphasia who had a history of choking. On 11/2/23 at 3:35 PM, the State Agency notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and provided the Administrator with the IJ templates. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 11/3/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed to remove the IJ on 11/03/23 and the IJ was removed on 11/4/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the removal plan on 11/06/23, prior to exit. and the scope and severity for F656 was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 10-2022: Reviewed [DATE] revealed, Policy Statement A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1 .The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 2. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. 3. The IDT includes: a. The attending physician; b. A registered nurse who has responsibility for the resident; c. A nurse aide who has responsibility for the resident; a member of the food and nutrition services staff; e. The resident and the resident's legal representative (to the extent practicable); and f. Other appropriate staff or professionals as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident . Resident #13 Cross Reference F600 Record review of Resident #13's care plan revealed Focus: The resident has risk for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) .DYSPHAGIA following CVA (cerebrovascular accident) .Interventions . CCD diet, Chopped Meat texture, Thin Consistency (undated) CNA to Chop meats. Date initiated 10/26/23 .Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any s/sx (signs/symptoms) of dysphagia: Pocketing, Choking, Coughing, Drooling, Holding food in mouth, Several attempts at swallowing, Refusing to eat, Appears concerned during meals. Date initiated: 06/26/2023 .Provide and serve diet as ordered. Date initiated: 06/26/2023 .Resident to be up in w/c (wheelchair) for all meals d/t (due to) aspiration precautions Date initiated: 08/25/2023 .Staff to assist patient with self-feeding with all meals Date initiated: 06/26/2023 . Record review of Resident #13's care plan Focus: The resident has an ADL (activity of daily living) self-care performance deficit . Interventions .EATING: The resident requires (supervision assistance) by (1) staff to eat. Date initiated 8/25/23 . Record review of Resident #13's care plan Focus: I have alteration in my respiratory status r/t .08/20/23-choking episode noted during meal on meat . Record review of Progress Notes, dated 08/23/23 at 10:16 AM stated, Resident is to be gotten up for meals in W/C (wheelchair). Record review of Progress Note dated 08/21/23 at 13:48 PM revealed, It was reported to ST (Speech Therapy) that the patient got choked while eating meat the previous day. Also nurse reports patient had difficulty while taking meds today. Record review of Resident #13's meal ticket, dated 8/30/23, all meals CCD-Mechanical Soft. Review of the Dinner meal ticket revealed- Ground Italian Sausage, brown gravy, parmesan noodles, broccoli florets chopped and sliced pears. The same meal was served on 10/25/23 the evening that the resident choked, and review of the dinner meal ticket revealed, Italian Sausage, Parmesan noodles, Broccoli florets, sliced pears. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 2:05 PM, with CNA #7 revealed she never saw on the electronic charting guide for Resident #13 that directed the CNA to chop meats. She revealed facility CNA tablets are how CNAs know how to chart for the residents and what they are supposed to get, but that was not showing on the tablets. During an interview, on 11/1/23 at 2:15 PM, with CNA #4 revealed I've never seen chopped meats listed on the tablets that we use to document. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 2:35 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse updated the care plan on 8/25/23 to be up in w/c for all meals and stated that she put it in there when he had his quarterly MDS. She revealed I think we also may have talked about it in the morning meeting, but I'm not sure. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 4:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed on 8/20/23 was the Nurse Supervisor when the resident choked that night and stated they put in a diet order change the next day for chopped meats and confirmed the order put in for care plans for him to be set up in the wheelchair was due to the choking episode on 8/20/23. She revealed she was unaware of the choking episode for Resident #13 in June and stated we have a daily stand-up meeting where all disciplines attend including the Administrator, DON, and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). She confirmed I'm not sure if it was discussed in the morning stand-up meeting or the clinical standards meeting about him choking on 8/20/23 but all the nursing knew about it and his care plan to be up in his wheelchair for all meals. During an interview on 11/01/23 at 4:15 PM, the DON confirmed after the 10/25/23 incident she instructed Resident #13's care plan to be updated to make sure it read for the CNA to chop meats was reflected on his meal tickets and that she was the one that put it on his 10/25/23 meal ticket for CNA to chop meats, and confirmed that it was not on there for the CNA to see that day. She confirmed it was not on the care plan before 10/25/23 and it should have been. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 8:30 AM, the DON revealed she was not aware that the resident had a choking episode in June or in August and revealed she didn't know that the care plan was updated in June for the staff to assist him with all meals or the care plan updated in August for him to be up in the wheelchair for all meals. She revealed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) team is involved in care plan meetings and confirmed the care plan was not being followed. She revealed she is usually informed of any changes during the stand-up meeting each morning and revealed, I don't know how the incident in June and August was missed. The DON stated, I guess it was a breakdown in communication. The DON confirmed she did instruct the staff to update the Resident's care plan on 10/26/23 for the CNA to Chop the meat. She revealed when it is in the care plan it pulls to the CNA's [NAME]. She confirmed it was not in the care plan prior to the incident on 10/25/23 and it should have been. She confirmed that the CNAs would not have any way of knowing how to chop the meats until they corrected it on 10/26/23. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 12:07 PM, the Social Worker revealed they normally keep sign-in sheets for the care plan meeting, but she does not have one for the 8/25/23 quarterly care plan meeting. She stated when she had the care plan meeting with Resident #13, it was just the two of them. She revealed if the family is coming, then all necessary disciplines will meet with the family. During an interview on 11/2/23 at 12:15 PM, the MDS nurse revealed she was not at Resident #13's quarterly care plan meeting on 8/25/23 and revealed she usually does not attend the resident care plan meetings only if she is requested to attend. She revealed she did put in the care plan in August that the resident was to be up in wheelchair (w/c) for all meals related to (d/t) aspiration precautions and that was probably because we discussed it in the morning meeting about his choking episode in August. She stated the morning meetings consist of all department heads, including the DON and the Administrator, we discuss anything from the 24-hour report that is significant. She stated, I'm sure everyone was aware of him choking which was a significant issue. Record review of Resident #13's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Dysphagia, Altered Mental Status, and Unspecified Dementia. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment further indicated under Section GG that Resident #13 required for eating, supervision, or touching assistance- Helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. The assessment further indicated under Section K that Resident #13 had Coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medication and complaints of difficulty or pain with swallowing. Resident #30 Record review of Resident #30's care plans revealed the resident had a care plan that indicated the resident has an ADL self-care deficit related to a CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) and left sided weakness, encephalopathy and dementia with an initiation date of 3/15/22. The interventions for this care plan included that the resident required total assistance by one staff with bathing/showering and extensive assistance by one staff with personal hygiene. During an observation and interview on 10/30/23 at 11:30 AM, revealed Resident #30 had facial hair that was approximately 3/4 inch long on the resident's chin and sides of his face. Bilateral fingernails were approximately 1/2 inch long and had a brown substance under 4 nails. Resident #30 stated that he was not sure when he was last shaved or when his nails were last trimmed. During an observation and interview on 10/31/23 at 9:15 AM, revealed Resident #30 with no change in appearance from the previous day. He stated he is supposed to be shaved when he is showered but it doesn't always happen. He revealed he likes his nails trimmed and has tried to cut them himself with a pair of toenail clippers. He revealed the treatment nurse trimmed them once before. During an observation and interview on 10/31/23 at 9:25 AM, with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 revealed she is assigned to Resident #30 today. She confirmed that the resident looked like he had not been shaved in a while and that his fingernails were long and needed to be trimmed. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 3:50 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 revealed the purpose of the care plans were to see what is needed to care for the residents and to make sure those needs are met. He stated that all staff have access to the care plans including the CNA's. He revealed that if a resident was supposed to be shaved and was not then their care plan was not implemented. During an interview on 11/1/23 at 4:00 PM with CNA #5 revealed the CNA's have access to the care plans and the resident care plans are to be followed for care needed and to make sure everything goes as it is supposed to. She confirmed that if a resident was not shaved and needed assistance then the resident's care plan would not have been implemented. Record review of Resident #30's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident is moderately cognitively intact and in Section GG that the resident needs substantial/maximal assistance with showers/bathe self. The Facility submitted the following Removal Plan: 1. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse audited diet orders for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. On 10/26/2023 at 7:30pm, Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. On 10/27/2023 at 8:00am, Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). 5. On 10/27/2023 at 1:00pm, Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. On 10/28/2023 at 8:00am, Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. On 11/1/2023 at 11:22am, Medical Director gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. On 11/1/2023 at 5:00pm, Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist, and the Medical Director. 11. On 11/2/2023 at 4:00pm, Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The Regional Clinical Services counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00am. 15. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-serviced. The facility alleges that all corrective actions were completed as of 11/3/2023 and the Immediate Jeopardy removed on 11/4/2023. The state Survey Agency (SA) validated the removal of the immediacy. 1. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 at 9:12 AM with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that the diet orders were audited for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through record review and interview that the Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through interview and record review that the Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:27 AM through interview that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). Record review of these in-services were validated by the SA. 5. The SA validated Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. The SA validated through interviews and record review on 11/06/23 that Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. The SA validated through interview and record review on 11/06/23 with the Medical Director that he gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet are on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. The SA validated that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. The SA validated through record review and interviews on 11/06/23 that an Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. 11. The SA validated through interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services that she counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00am. 15. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-service is completed.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of choking on 06/17/23 was ordered a therapeutic diet to prevented a choking incident on 8/20/23 and again on 10/25/23 which required Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and hospitalization with a poor recovery prognosis for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for diets. The facility failed to identify a choking incident on 06/17/23 with required hospitalization for three (3) days and removal of a food bolus from his oropharynx and failed to identify an 08/20/23 choking incident that required the Heimlich maneuver to remove the food bolus from his oropharynx in the facility. This failure resulted in the resident not receiving services to prevent choking episodes. The resident's diet was changed on 8/21/23 to Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) mechanical soft. The resident's diet changed on 8/31/23 to CCD with chopped meats and the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were to chop the resident's meat when the tray was served. The meal tickets were never changed to include the CNA to chop meats. On 10/25/23 in the evening, Resident #13 was served an Italian Sausage link that was five (5) to six (6) 1 ½ inch chunks of meat and the resident was found in his bed, unable to breath and without a pulse or respirations. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was performed for over ten (10) minutes and Resident #13 was transported to the local hospital where the resident was placed on life support. The facility's failure to ensure that staff were aware of the diet needs of Resident #13 and to clarify and serve the correct diet order to a resident with a history of choking and dysphagia resulted in Resident #13 choking on 10/25/23 and required life saving measures The resident remained in the hospital on the ventilator at the time of the survey. The situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 6/17/23 when the facility failed to ensure Resident #13 received a modified diet after a choking episode. On 11/2/23 at 3:35 PM, the State Agency notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and provided the Administrator with the IJ templates. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 11/3/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed to remove the IJ on 11/03/23, and the IJ was removed on 11/04/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the removal plan on 11/06/23, prior to exit. and the scope and severity for F803 was lowered to a 'D while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: Cross Reference F600 Review of the facility policy titled, Food and Nutrition Services dated October 2022, revealed, Policy Statement Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 7 .Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident . Review of the facility policy titled, Diet and Nutrition Care Manual Dysphagia Advanced (level 3) or Mechanical (Dental) soft diet dated 2019 revealed, This diet is used for individuals with mild oral and/or pharyngeal phase dysphagia. Foods that are difficult to chew are chopped, ground, shredded, cooked, or altered to make them easier to chew and swallow . Review of the facility policy titled, Therapeutic Diets dated October 2022 revealed, the diet order should match the terminology used by the food and nutrition services department. Record review of the Diet Requisition Form New admission dated 5/16/22 revealed Resident #13 had a regular consistent carbohydrate (CCD) regular texture, thin liquids diet. Record review of the local hospital emergency room Report, dated 6/17/23, read chief complaint: Altered Mental Status. Rehab facility was contacted for further information regarding patient's presentation, and they reported that patient had abnormal moaning and jerking-like motions, and that staff had concerns for new onset seizure-like activity. Per chart review, patient has no prior history of seizures but does have a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) involving left middle cerebral artery. At the time of exam, it was noted that the patient had a golf ball sized food bolus extracted from posterior oropharynx. Record review of Progress notes dated 08/20/23 at 18:20 PM, revealed, Resident noted with choking episode this shift at dinner time. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reporting that the resident had gotten choked on a piece of meat off his dinner tray. LPN assist resident with dislodging piece of meat. Resident's color returning to normal with O2 (oxygen) saturation of 97% on RA (room air). Resident continued to be noted with a cough. Record review of the Diet Requisition Form Diet Change, dated 8/21/23, revealed Resident #13 was changed to a Mechanical soft chopped meat texture diet. Record review of a Meal Ticket, dated 08/31/23 at 2:34 PM, revealed diet order was changed to Chopped Meats; Knife and resident was served whole meats with a knife to cut. Record review of Progress Note dated 08/21/23 at 13:48 PM read, It was reported to ST (Speech Therapy) that the pt got choked while eating meat the previous day. Also nurse reports pt had difficulty while taking meds today. Record review of Resident #13's meal ticket dated 8/30/23 all meals CCD-Mechanical Soft. Review of the Dinner meal ticket revealed- Ground Italian Sausage, brown gravy, parmesan noodles, broccoli florets chopped and sliced pears. The same meal was served on 10/25/23, the evening that the resident choked, and review of the dinner meal ticket revealed, Italian Sausage, Parmesan noodles, Broccoli florets, sliced pears. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 10/25/23 at 19:42 PM stated, Nurse was alerted by CNA that I was needed in resident's room. Upon arriving in room resident appeared to be having seizure activity. Pulse was faint and respirations noted. Resident had foamy secretions coming from mouth. Resident was pale in color. CNA told this nurse that prior to her alerting me he had been eating. This nurse performed back thrust times 5 and was in process of performing ABD (abdominal) thrust when other help arrived. Thrust was ineffective. Nurse left room and got crash cart and upon returning CPR was in process related to no pulse or respirations. Progress note for 10/25/23 at 19:45 PM Nurse observed resident unresponsive, pale and foaming at the mouth. Nurse called 911 and returned to aid with chest compression until EMS arrived. Record review of the local hospital emergency room report dated 10/25/23 stated, History of Present Illness .Per ambulance run report: Patient was found lying supine in bed upon arrival; nursing home staff stated that the patient was found unresponsive and cyanotic immediately after mealtime. Per ED (Emergency Department) sign out: Patient was exhibiting agonal breathing; a piece of sausage was extracted from his oropharynx prior to intubation . During the intubation, we visualized a very large piece of food obstructing the patient's airway, using forceps, and removed the foreign body. After the patient was intubated and sedated and placed on the ventilator, his vital signs normalized . In an interview on 10/31/23 at 12:50 PM CNA # 2 revealed she had never been in-serviced on how to chop the resident's meats before and wasn't aware that he was supposed to have his meats chopped because the diet ticket never said to chop his meats. In an interview on 10/31/23 at 1:40 PM with CNA #7 revealed the day before he choked on 10/25/23, he had a whole piece of chicken that was served on his meal tray. She stated we never cut his meat up before and the resident can eat by himself, and we don't stay in the room with him while he is eating. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 8:10 AM, CNA #8 revealed she was never aware that the resident required his meats to be chopped before he choked on 10/25/23. She revealed we were told after he choked that we needed to make sure and chop his meats, but not before. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 8:25 AM with Dietary management Service Account Manager revealed she has been here for about two months and stated that when she started, she was told anyone with a chopped meats diet we were to put a whole piece of meat on the plate and put a knife on the tray so that the CNA could cut up the meat. She revealed this was the only place she had ever worked that a CNA would cut the meat up. She stated on 10/25/23 she was in the kitchen and did observe the meal which consisted of Italian sausage that was cut into about one (1) to one and one-half (1½) inch chunks and each resident got about three or four chunks of the meat on their tray. An interview, on 11/01/23 at 8:50 AM, with CNA #6 revealed that she was working the night of 10/25/23 and went into Resident #13's room at about 7:15 PM to get his vital signs. The resident said he was hungry. CNA #6 stated she assisted him to the bathroom and then set up his tray which consisted of noodles, round Polish sausage there were about four large round pieces about ½ inch to one inch long on his tray, and broccoli florets. She revealed she didn't cut the sausage up because she was not aware that he required his meat to be chopped or cut. She revealed I went and started getting his roommate's vital signs and then she heard Resident #13 make a sound I never had heard before. She stated she thought he was having a seizure because he had fallen back on his bed rail and was foaming out of the mouth. I went for help immediately. She revealed on his plate he had eaten all the sausages and maybe one of the broccoli florets. She stated that after this incident we were in-serviced to make sure to look on the meal ticket and that CNAs were responsible for chopping meat for residents requiring chopped meats. She confirmed before the choking incident they were not told to cut the residents' meats up. She stated she had worked here for about a year and had never been told to chop his meats before and hadn't seen his meats chopped up. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator (ADM) revealed Speech Therapy had ordered a chopped meats diet in August because the resident had a choking episode. She revealed the Dietary Director of Operations told her they were not able to do a chopped meats diet. She revealed we immediately in-serviced the staff that the kitchen would send out the appropriate knife and they would have to chop the meats. She stated, I did not feel comfortable with my staff cutting the meats, but I was told by the Dietary Director of Operations that it was a facility policy but since then I found out that wasn't true. She confirmed that she found out that wasn't true through my Corporate Chief Operating Officer and stated, I didn't say anything to the Dietary Director of Operations after that because that's a corporate-level issue and I was letting them handle it. She stated, I could make it happen today to stop all chop meats and just do a Mechanical soft. I haven't done it yet because Corporate had been working with Dietary Management about the issue. She revealed that since the incident that happened on 10/25/23 with Resident #13 the aides are still chopping meat for the residents and stated that we keep a list of residents who require chopped meats at the nurse's station. She confirmed when she found out on 10/26/23 that the resident had choked, she hadn't done anything different with the chopped meat diets because corporate is working on that. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 10:05 AM, with the Director of Operations (DO) for the dietary services management company revealed that the management company has three diets which are Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed. He stated that Resident #13 was put on a chopped meat diet on 08/21/23, because he had a choking episode. He confirmed that he had asked the Administrator for a diet clarification because we do not historically do chopped meats, we could do mechanical soft, and he was told by the Administrator to send out a knife for the residents who were on a chopped meat diet and the aides would chop the meats. He confirmed that this occurred on the Thursday before Labor Day, which would have been 08/31/23. The Director of Operations revealed he is over 23 buildings, and this is the only building where they are doing chopped meats and requiring aides to chop the meat when it gets to the resident. In an interview on 11/01/2023 at 12:55 PM, with the Nurse Consultant, Director of Nurses (DON), and Administrator revealed they were not aware of the choking episode on 6/17/2023. The DON and Nurse Consultant revealed they were not aware of a choking episode on 8/20/23. The Administrator revealed she was aware of the 8/20/23 choking episode and had a conversation with the Dietary because Speech Therapy had evaluated Resident #13 and requested a chopped meat diet. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 2:05 PM with CNA #7 revealed she never saw on the electronic charting guide for Resident #13 that the CNA was to chop meats. She revealed our tablets are how we know how to chart for the residents and what they are supposed to get. In an interview on 11/01/23 at 4:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed on 8/20/23 was the Nurse Supervisor; she stated the floor nurse hollered for me and said she had done the Heimlich maneuver on Resident #13 and was able to get the food expelled. She stated they put in a diet order change the next day for chopped meats. Record review of Resident #13's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Transient Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Dysphagia, Altered Mental Status, and Unspecified Dementia. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment further indicated under Section GG that Resident #13 required for eating, supervision, or touching assistance- Helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. The assessment further indicated under Section K that Resident #13 had coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medication and complaints of difficulty or pain with swallowing. Removal Plan: On 11/02/23 at 3:35 PM, the Facility Administrator was notified that the situation of neglect for Resident #13 was deemed an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The Facility submitted the following Removal Plan: 1. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse audited diet orders for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. On 10/26/2023 at 7:30pm, Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. On 10/27/2023 at 8:00am, Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). 5. On 10/27/2023 at 1:00pm, Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. On 10/28/2023 at 8:00 am, Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. On 11/1/2023 at 11:22 am, Medical Director gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. On 11/1/2023 at 5:00pm, Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist and the Medical Director. 11. On 11/2/2023 at 4:00pm, Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The Regional Clinical Services counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. 15. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-serviced. The facility alleges that all corrective actions were completed as of 11/3/2023 and the Immediate Jeopardy removed on 11/4/2023. 1. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 at 9:12 AM with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that the diet orders were audited for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through record review and interview that the Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through interview and record review that the Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:27 AM through interview that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). Record review of these in-services were validated by the SA. 5. The SA validated Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. The SA validated through interviews and record review on 11/06/23 that Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. The SA validated through interview and record review on 11/06/23 with the Medical Director that he gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet are on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. The SA validated that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. The SA validated through record review and interviews on 11/06/23 that an Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. 11. The SA validated through interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services that she counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. 15. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-service is completed.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner to preve...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner to prevent negligent care to a resident and to ensure staff were made aware of significant incidents and the dietary needs of Resident #13 for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Resident #13 Resident #13 had choking episodes on 6/20/23 which resulted in the hospitalization where a golf ball size meat bolus was removed in the Emergency Room. Resident #13 choked on meat again on 8/20/23 which was removed in the facility with the Heimlich Maneuver. The resident's diet was changed on 8/21/23 to Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD) mechanical soft. The Administrator requested the resident's diet changed on 8/31/23 to CCD with chopped meats and the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were to chop the resident's meat when the tray was served. The meal tickets were never changed to include the directions for CNA to chop meats. On 10/25/23 in the evening, Resident #13 was served an Italian Sausage link that was five (5) to six (6) 1½ inch chunks of meat and the resident was found in his bed, unable to breath and without a pulse or respirations. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was performed for over ten (10) minutes and was not successful. Resident #13 was transported to the local hospital where he remained on life support. The hospital report revealed the resident had choked again. This situation was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 6/17/23 when the Administration failed ensure measures were put into place to prevent further choking episodes. The facility's failure to be administered in a way to ensure a resident was protected from further choking incidents resulted in harm to Resident #13 and the likelihood of serious harm, impairment, or death to other residents. On 11/2/23 at 3:35 PM, the State Agency notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and provided the Administrator with the IJ templates. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 11/3/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed to remove the IJ on 11/3/23, and the IJ was removed on 11/4/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the removal plan on 11/06/23, prior to exit. and the scope and severity for F835 was lowered to a 'D while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: Cross Reference F600 Record review of facility policy, dated March 2017, Job Description Position Title: Facility Administrator revealed, Basic Function- Responsible for the overall management, leadership, growth, and profitability of the facility . Essential Functions and Responsibilities: .Maintain and guide the implementation of facility policies and procedures in compliance with corporate, state, federal, and other regulatory guidelines . Ensures that the quality and appropriateness of resident care meets or exceeds company and industry standards and ensures that all services are in compliance with state and federal legal, regulatory, accreditation and reimbursement guidelines . Report incident reports to proper company and agency authorities in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Attend and/or conduct facility meetings, as required to carry out responsibilities. Promotes optimal communication among staff members, facility staff, referral sources physicians and residents. Record review of facility policy, dated April 2017, titled, Job Description Position Title: Director of Nursing revealed, Function: Plans, coordinates and manages the nursing department. Responsible for the overall direction, coordination and evaluation of nursing care and services provided to the Residents .Care and Services: Responsible for the overall direction, coordination and evaluation of the nursing department . Schedules and performs Resident rounds to monitor and evaluate the quality and appropriateness of nursing care. Maintains administrative authority, responsibility and accountability for the proper charting and documentation of care and of medications and treatments. Record review of facility policy, dated 05/2017, titled, Position Description Position Title: Assistant Director of Nursing revealed, The primary purpose of your job position is to assist the Director of Nursing Services in planning organizing, developing, and directing the day-to-day functions of the Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, the Medical Director, and/or Director of Nursing Services, to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times . Review nurses' notes to ensure that they are informative and descriptive of the nursing care being provided . Participate in developing, planning, conducting, and scheduling in-service training classes that provide instructions on how to do the job, and ensure a well-educated nursing service department . The Administrator (ADM) in an interview on 11/01/23 at 9:30 AM, revealed Speech Therapy had ordered a chopped meats diet in August because the resident had a choking episode. She revealed the dietary management company's Dietary Director of Operations told her they were not able to do a chopped meats diet. She revealed we immediately in-serviced the staff that the kitchen would send out the appropriate knife and they would have to chop the meats. She stated, I didn't feel comfortable with my staff cutting the meats, but I was told by the Dietary Director of Operations that it was a facility policy but since then I found out that wasn't true. She confirmed that she found out that wasn't true through Corporate and stated, I didn't say anything to the Dietary Director of Operations after that because that's a corporate-level issue, and I was letting them handle it. She stated, I could make it happen today to stop all chop meats and just do a Mechanical soft. I haven't done it yet because Corporate had been working with the dietary company about the issue. She revealed that since the incident that happened on 10/25 with Resident #13 the aides are still chopping meat for the residents and stated that we keep a list of residents who require chopped meats at the nurse's station. She confirmed when she found out on 10/26/23 that the resident had choked, she had not done anything different with the chopped meat diets because corporate is working on that. The Director of Operations (DO) for Dietary with the dietary management company stated in an interview on 11/01/23 at 10:05 AM, that the company has three diets which are Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed. He stated that Resident #13 was put on a chopped meat diet on 08/21/23, because he had a choking episode. He confirmed that he had asked the Administrator for a diet clarification because dietary does not historically do chopped meats, but could do mechanical soft, and he was told by the Administrator to send out a knife for the residents who were on a chopped meat diet and the aides would chop the meats. He confirmed that this occurred on the Thursday before Labor Day, which would have been 08/31/23. The Director of Operations for Dietary revealed he is over 23 buildings, and this is the only building where they are doing chopped meats and requiring aides to chop the meat when it gets to the resident. He stated that he did not like sending knives out for CNAs to cut up meat but he was unable to get the Administrator to understand that chopped meats is considered a mechanical soft diet. The Director of Operations (DO) for Dietary stated he just needed the Administration to get the diet order clarified. The Nurse Consultant, Director of Nurses, and Administrator revealed during an interview on 11/01/2023 at 12:55 PM, they were not aware of the choking episode on 6/17/2023. The DON and Nurse Consultant revealed they were not aware of a choking episode on 8/20/23. The Administrator revealed she was aware of the 8/20/23 choking episode and had a conversation with the Dietary because Speech Therapy had evaluated Resident #13 and requested a chopped meat diet. Registered Nurse (RN) #2, in an interview on 11/01/23 at 4:00 PM, revealed she was unaware of the choking episode for Resident #13 in June and stated we have a daily stand-up meeting where all disciplines attend including the Administrator, DON, and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). She confirmed I'm not sure if it was discussed in the morning stand-up meeting or the clinical standards meeting about him choking on 8/20/23. The Administrator revealed during an interview on 11/01/23 at 4:10 PM, for the incident on 10/25/23 she was not made aware that Resident #13 was eating dinner when the episode occurred, until the next day, on 10/26/23, around lunch time. She confirmed the nurse told her that he had a seizure and the facility had to do CPR and send Resident #13 to the hospital. She had seen the hospital paperwork on 10/26/23 that revealed he had the sausage in his oropharynx and revealed for the 8/20/23 incident the staff nurses just reported that he got strangled on his food and that's when he got the order for speech to be evaluated. She confirmed she was not aware that Resident #13 required the Heimlich maneuver at that time. The DON revealed in an interview, at the same time, on 11/01/23 at 4:10 PM, that for the 8/20/23 incident she was made aware that the resident had trouble with taking his medicines and was not made aware of him choking. She revealed she is going to start going back and reading the nurse's notes each day so she will know what is going on. She revealed it usually will come out on the 24-hour nurses report and we will discuss it in the morning meeting. The DON and Administrator both revealed they were not sure how the choking episodes got missed. The DON confirmed after the 10/25/23 incident she instructed Resident #13's care plan to be updated to make sure CNA to chop meats was reflected on his meal tickets and that she was the one that put it on his 10/25/23 meal ticket for CNA to chop meats, and confirmed that it was not on there for the CNA to see that day. She confirmed it was not on the care plan before 10/25/23 and it should have been. She confirmed again that she was not aware of Resident #13 having a choking episode in June or August and that she wasn't aware that he had choked on 10/25/23 until the afternoon on 10/26/23. An interview on 11/02/23 at 8:30 AM, the DON revealed she did not know that the care plan was updated in June for the staff to assist him with all meals or the care plan updated in August for him to be up in the wheelchair for all meals. She revealed Resident #13 has a history of wanting to lie down in bed and eat. That's his preference. SA asked the DON why she thought the care plan was put in on 6/26/23. The DON revealed I didn't put it in, and I wasn't aware of that care plan or a choking incident. The DON stated, I wasn't aware of this incident until it was brought to my attention yesterday. I can't review every piece of paper that comes through. She revealed she is usually informed of any changes during the stand-up meeting each morning and revealed I do not know how the incident in June and August was missed, she confirmed I guess it was a breakdown in communication. She stated that for the incident on 10/25/23, the nurse let me know that night that she thought he was having a seizure and revealed she did not instruct the night shift staff to start an investigation because I thought it was a seizure. The DON revealed the staff called her back that night and said the resident was being admitted and had to be intubated. She revealed that they did not have stand-up the next morning. She stated, I can not remember why we didn't have it, but I was informed around one or one-thirty that day when we were having a party, she revealed a staff member said they had called over to the ER and had been told that he had something in his throat when they tried to intubate him. She stated, that's when we called over and got the medical records. She stated at that time they had started an investigation, but she still wasn't aware of the June and August incidents of choking until the State Agency (SA) had told her they had discovered documentation of choking in the medical records and nurses' notes. The DON confirmed that she didn't thoroughly investigate the choking because she thought it was a seizure. The DON confirmed she did instruct the staff to update the Resident's care plan on 10/26/23 for the CNA to Chop the meat. She revealed when it is in the care plan it pulls to the CNA's [NAME]. She confirmed it was not in the care plan prior to the incident on 10/25/23 and it should have been. She confirmed that the CNAs would not have any way of knowing how to chop the meats until they corrected it on 10/26/23. An interview on 11/02/23 at 10:40 AM the ADON revealed she did an in-service on 8/31/2023 for the CNAs and nursing staff regarding Chopped meats. She confirmed the in-service was not attended by all nursing staff including CNA #2 and CNA #6. She revealed that the 7 p.m.-7 a.m. shift did not get the in-service on chopping meats because the meal trays are sent out on the day shift not the night shift. She confirmed that she did not demonstrate how to chop the meat to the in-service staff. Record review of the Diet requisition form Diet change dated 8/21/23 revealed Resident #13 was changed to a Mechanical soft chopped meat texture diet. Record review Meal ticket dated 08/31/23 at 2:34 PM diet order was changed to Chopped Meats; Knife and resident was served whole meats with a knife to cut. Record review of Resident #13's meal ticket, dated 8/30/23, all meals CCD-Mechanical Soft. Review of the Dinner meal ticket revealed- Ground Italian Sausage, brown gravy, parmesan noodles, broccoli florets chopped and sliced pears. The same meal was served on 10/25/23 the evening that the resident choked. Record review of the dinner meal ticket revealed, Italian Sausage, Parmesan noodles, Broccoli florets, sliced pears. Record review of Progress notes dated 08/20/23 at 18:20 PM, stated, Resident noted with choking episode this shift at dinner time. LPN reporting that the resident had gotten choked on a piece of meat off his dinner tray. LPN assist resident with dislodging piece of meat. Resident's color returning to normal with O2 (oxygen) saturation of 97% on RA (room air). Resident continued. to be noted with a cough. Record review of Progress Note dated 08/21/23 at 13:48 PM stated, It was reported to ST (Speech Therapy) that the pt got choked while eating meat the previous day. Also nurse reports pt had difficulty while taking meds today. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 08/23/23 at 10:16 AM stated, Resident is to be gotten up for meals in W/C (wheelchair). The Facility submitted the following Removal Plan, on 11/03/23, alleging removal of the immediacy as of 11/04/23. 1. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse audited diet orders for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. On 10/26/2023 at 3:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. On 10/26/2023 at 7:30 pm, Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. On 10/27/2023 at 8:00 am, Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). 5. On 10/27/2023 at 1:00pm, Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. On 10/28/2023 at 8:00 am, Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. On 11/1/2023 at 11:22 am, Medical Director gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. On 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm, Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. On 11/1/2023 at 5:00pm, Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist, and Medical Director. 11. On 11/2/2023 at 4:00pm, Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The Regional Clinical Services counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. 15. The Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-serviced. The facility alleges that all corrective actions were completed as of 11/3/2023 and the Immediate Jeopardy removed on 11/4/2023. 1. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 at 9:12 AM with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that the diet orders were audited for residents that require chop meats and ensured that it is on the [NAME] and Care Plan. Results noted five residents on chopped meats and five corrections were made to pull to the [NAME] and Care Plan by the MDS Nurse. 2. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through record review and interview that the Nurse Educator initiated an in-service to nursing staff to supervise residents who require a chopped diet. 3. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:24 AM through interview and record review that the Staff Development Coordinator initiated an in-service to all staff on Abuse/Neglect, Vulnerable Adults Act and Resident Rights. 4. The SA validated on 11/06/23 at 9:27 AM through interview that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services with nursing staff on verify a meal ticket, identify diet textures, fluid consistencies, Choking/Relief of foreign body obstructing airway, Heimlich Maneuver Competency, Crash Carts (location and how they are stocked). Record review of these in-services were validated by the SA. 5. The SA validated Speech Therapy evaluation was requested on residents that remain in facility on chopped meats by Administration and Medical Director. 6. The SA validated through interviews and record review on 11/06/23 that Speech Therapy evaluated four residents with chopped meats with no change noted in each residents Care Plan. Each resident was found to be safe on a chopped meat diet. Residents that are in hospital will be evaluated per Speech on return to facility. 7. The SA validated through interview and record review on 11/06/23 with the Medical Director that he gave orders to change all chopped meat diets to Mechanical Soft. Orders were changed on residents remaining in the facility with a chopped meat order, Responsible Parties of residents were notified, and dietary recommendations were turned into dietary department. 8. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Minimum Date Set (MDS) Nurse that updated diets for all residents in facility on Mechanical Soft diet are on [NAME] and Care Plan. 9. The SA validated that the Nurse Educator initiated in-services to nursing staff to notify Director of Nurses of all transfers out of facility, giving a resident full assessment and documenting on each resident transferred out, making sure when passing trays, the meal ticket matches what is on the tray, chopped meat will no longer be provided it will be ground meat consistency (Mechanical Soft), and choking verses seizure (similarity and differences). 10. The SA validated through record review and interviews on 11/06/23 that an Emergency AD HOC Quality Assurance Meeting was held. Administrator in-serviced that paperwork on all transfers will be obtained and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team in morning stand up meeting. Those present were the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Social Services, Medical Records Clerk, Wound Nurse, Business office Managers, Housekeeping Supervisor, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Maintenance Director, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, Assistant Director of Nurses, Activity Director, Staff Development Coordinator, Human Resources, Respiratory Therapy, Regional Dietary Manager, Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. 11. The SA validated through interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Director of Nursing initiated an audit to review twenty-four-hour report from 6/1/2023 to 11/1/2023 to ensure no other incidents of choking or harm were documented and unreported to Administration. 12. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing on proper use of the twenty-four-hour report, Proper Reporting, and Proper Investigation on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. The twenty-four-hour report will be printed each morning and taken to the daily stand-up meeting for review for all discipline documentation effective 11/3/2023. 13. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the weekend Registered Nurse was in-serviced on 11/1/2023 at 1:00pm to notify Director of Nurses with all transfers and incidents by the Nurse educator. 14. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 with the Regional Clinical Services that she counseled the Administrator, Director or Nurses and Assistant Director of Nursing on investigation being timely and thorough on 11/3/2023 at 10:00 am. 15. The SA validated through record review and interview on 11/06/23 that the Regional Clinical Services Nurse and Regional Case Mix Nurse in-serviced Administrator, Director of Nurses, Assistant Director of Nurses, Staff Development, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurses, Medical Records, Wound Nurse, Nurse Educator, Social Services Director, Assistant Social Services Director, Business Office Managers and Therapy on reviewing care plans in Care Plan Meeting on 11/3/2023 at 4:00pm. 16. All in-services that have been initiated will have 100% completion by 11/3/2023. NO employees will be allowed to work until in-service is completed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent a resident from b...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent a resident from being physically restrained in a bed that was up against the wall with bilateral ¼ side rails up, a large foam wedge cushion in the bed, with a straight back chair and a wheelchair pushed up next to the bed for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for restraints. Resident #41 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physical Restraints and Involuntary Seclusion with a review date of 3/2023 revealed .Intent .Patients/Residents have the right to be free from any physical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and when not required to treat the patient's /resident's medical condition. Patients/Residents have the right to function at their highest practicable level in the least restrictive environment possible . An observation and attempted interview on 10/30/23 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #41 lying in bed. The bed was pushed up against the wall on one side, had one-fourth (¼) side rails up bilaterally, and an approximately 3 feet long foam wedge cushion lying in the bed on the side that was away from the wall, a straight back chair was pushed up against the side of the bed below the 1/4 side rail and a wheelchair was pushed up beside the straight back chair. An attempted interview revealed the resident was pleasant but confused with disorganized speech. An observation on 10/30/23 at 11:15 AM, revealed Resident #41 lying in bed with her feet up on the wall beside the bed, the foam wedge was pushed toward the end of the bed, straight back chair remained pushed up next to the bed and a wheelchair parked next to the straight back chair. An observation on 10/30/23 at 3:00 PM, revealed that Resident #41 was lying in bed and the foam wedge cushion had been pushed to the foot of the bed, and the straight back chair was next to bed with wheelchair beside the straight back chair as previously observed. An interview and observation on 10/30/23 at 4:30 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed that the foam wedge in the resident's bed was larger than normal and stated she was not sure why the chairs were there previously or why the wedge was being used but admitted that it would be hard for the resident to get out of bed with all those things blocking her. This observation revealed the straight back chair and wheelchair had been moved away from the side of the bed, but the large foam wedge was still in the bed. An interview and observation on 10/30/23 at 4:45 PM, with the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the foam wedge that was in Resident #41's bed was larger than what they normally used for positioning. She confirmed that she noticed the straight back chair next to the resident's bed at lunch, but a nurse was sitting in it and feeding the resident at that time. She confirmed with the 1/4 side rail, bed against the wall, large foam wedge in the bed and a straight back chair pushed next to the bed then the resident would not be able to get out of bed and it should not have been that way. She confirmed that it was considered as restraining the resident to stay in the bed. An interview on 11/1/23 at 10:30 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 confirmed that Resident #41 did have a large foam wedge in her bed with 1/4 side rails, a straight back chair pushed next to the end of the bed with a wheelchair pushed up next to the straight back chair. She revealed that the wedge was being used to keep the resident turned in the bed but admitted that it was larger than most. She stated she put the straight back chair there after breakfast and parked the wheelchair beside it and did not think about it keeping the resident from getting out of bed. She confirmed that the resident would not have been able to get out of bed with all of that in the bed and beside the bed. Record review of Resident #41's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. Record review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/2/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, which indicate the resident is severely cognitively impaired and in Section GG that the resident needed partial to moderate assistance with walking.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide shav...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide shaving and nail care for a resident requiring assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for ADL's. Resident #30 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting with a revision date of 3/2018 revealed under Policy Statement .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . An observation and interview on 10/30/23 at 11:30 AM, revealed Resident #30 had facial hair that was approximately 3/4 inch long on the resident's chin and sides of his face. Bilateral fingernails were approximately 1/2 inch long and had a brown substance under 4 nails. Resident #30 stated that he was not sure when he was last shaved or when his nails were last trimmed. An observation and interview on 10/31/23 at 9:15 AM, revealed Resident #30 with no change in appearance from the previous day. He stated he is supposed to be shaved when he is showered but it doesn't always happen. He revealed he likes his nails trimmed and has tried to cut them himself with a pair of toenail clippers. He revealed the treatment nurse trimmed them once before. An observation and interview on 10/31/23 at 9:25 AM, with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 revealed she is assigned to Resident #30 today. She confirmed that the resident looked like he had not been shaved in a while and that his fingernails were long and needed to be trimmed. An observation and interview on 10/31/23 at 9:40 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed that Resident #30 looked like it had been a while since he was shaved and that his fingernails were long and revealed that could cause a skin tear. Record review of Resident #30's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident is moderately cognitively intact and in Section GG that the resident needs substantial/maximal assistance with showers/bathe self.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, facility assessment and policy review the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, facility assessment and policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing resulting in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) not being provided for two (2) of six (6) residents sampled. Resident #6 and #30 Findings include Review of the facility policy titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing with a revision date of August 2022 revealed under the Policy .Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. This review revealed under Policy Interpretation and implementation .Minimum staffing requirements imposed by the state, if applicable, are adhered to when determining staffing ratios but are not necessarily considered a determination of sufficient and competent staffing. An observation on the A Hall on 12/20/23 at 9:25 AM revealed breakfast trays were still sitting in the resident's rooms and there was a strong smell of urine when entering the hall from behind closed doors. An interview on 12/20/23 at 9:40 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed she smelled the urine and stated, they have not figured out exactly where it was coming from. She revealed that the housekeeping was trying to get into the hall, but all the breakfast trays had not been picked up yet. She stated that there were two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) for A Hall for 30 residents and two CNAs for the A Plus (+) Hall for about 28 residents. She stated that they normally have a CNA that floats between the two halls, but they do not today, and it is hard for them to get all the baths done. An observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 9:50 AM, with CNA #2 revealed she was in Resident #6's room performing vital signs and picking up breakfast trays. A strong smell of urine was noted coming from Resident #6's bed and it was wet. CNA #2 confirmed that Resident #6 was due for a bath today. She stated it is just her and one other CNA for 30 residents and they have to do their own baths. She stated, we are going to get to them, but it's hard. They say we are not shorthanded, but this is hard to get everything done for the residents. She confirmed that normally they have a third CNA that floats and helps, but they do not today. She stated, we will just have to take turns giving our baths so one of us can answer the call lights. She revealed that there were a lot of residents on the A hall's that were totally dependent on staff. During an observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 10:10 AM, revealed Resident #30 had facial hair that was approximately ½ inch long on his chin and the sides of his face. Resident #30 stated the last time he had a shower and was shaved was last Thursday. The resident revealed that he is supposed to get a shower on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. He stated that a lot of times they will shower me and forget to shave me. An interview with CNA #1 on 12/20/23 at 1:55 PM, revealed there were two (2) aides assigned to A + hall and she was responsible for 14 residents. She revealed that they must give their own showers which made managing the resident care difficult, but they do the best they can. She revealed that they do not get any help from the office staff and strictly relied on aides to help each other out to meet the residents' needs. An observation and interview on 12/20/23 at 2:00 PM, with Resident #30 and the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that Resident #30 needed to be shaved. She confirmed that Resident #30 should be receiving a shower on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays which includes shaving. Resident #30 stated to the DON, The last time I had a shower or was shaved was a week ago. An interview on 12/20/23 at 2:05 PM with CNA #4 revealed she cannot be seen talking to the State Agency (SA) in the hall because they have already come around and told us that we are throwing them under the bus, but I am not, I am just telling the truth, we need help. It is hard to get everything done when there are just two of us for 28 residents and sometimes things go undone. An interview on 12/20/23 at 2:20 PM, with LPN #1 confirmed that baths sometimes do not get done on the day shift for different reasons but sometimes it is because we are shorthanded. An interview and observation on 12/20/23 at 3:00PM, with Resident #6 revealed she was sitting in the dining area participating in activities. This observation revealed the resident had an odor of urine and her hair was in a long braid and hair was coming out of the braid and sticking up on top of her head, appeared greasy. On interview Resident #6 revealed the facility is short staffed a lot and those girls have so much to do so she doesn't complain and tries to do as much on her own as she can. She stated she is supposed to get a bath on Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays, but she did not get one today. She confirmed that her sheets were wet this morning when she finally got up around 9:30 AM. She stated she wears a brief during the day and admitted she had the same brief on that was put on her this morning around 9:30 AM and that no one had checked it today. She revealed that sometimes she can tell when she has used the bathroom and sometimes, she cannot. An interview with CNA #2 on 12/20/23 3:06 PM, revealed that she was working A hall and assigned to 15 residents. She revealed that the aides were responsible for making sure the residents were clean/dry, toileting, turning and repositioning every 2 hours, showers, vital signs, passing meal trays and assisting with feeding, getting residents up and putting them back to bed, passing out ice and water and at times taking the residents out to smoke for a 15-minute smoke breaks. She stated that it's hard to get everything done. She revealed there may be things that do not get done in a day. She stated that this past Saturday they only had 3 aides and 2 were agencies. She revealed not all the residents got a shower that were scheduled to. An interview on 12/20/23 at 3:15 PM, with the Administrator revealed she had a CNA quit over the weekend and she had to terminate one on Monday. She stated she was not aware that there were only four (4) CNAs on the A halls, because she is not responsible for staffing. She stated the only reason she got involved with the staffing this past weekend was because her Director of Nurses (DON) had called in for the week. She stated, I give that responsibility to someone else, and I expect them to do their job. She revealed they do have a standup meeting each morning and talk about staffing and she has a way of printing the Per Patient Day (PPD) report off. She confirmed she should have been aware of only having 4 CNAs for the A Halls and stated that normally they did have a fifth one but after that one quit Sunday it was hard to find someone to fill that spot. She admitted that she has CNA staff working in offices in the building that could have gone to help. An interview on 12/20/23 at 3:45 PM with LPN-Staff Development revealed she prepares the schedule for all nursing staff, and she was aware that the A Hall only had 4 CNAs on duty the last few days, because they had a CNA to quit and one that got fired. She admitted that the A hall has most of the total care residents and it is hard to get everything done with just 4 CNA's. She stated they have started using some agencies, but it has to be approved with corporate and that is difficult. She states they normally only approve us to use agency on the weekends and there is a cap for how many we can use financially. Record review of the staffing grid for 12/20/23 and interview with the Administrator on 12/20/23 at 4:00 PM, revealed there were seven (7) CNA's for 7a-7p and when compared to the working schedule for today it revealed there were six (6) CNA's until 3p-7p, when the business office manager came out and worked the floor. The Administrator stated she put a total of 7 CNA's down on the staffing grid because the Transporter/CNA was their 7th CNA. An interview on 12/20/23 at 4:10 PM, with the Transporter/CNA and the Administrator present revealed she only works the halls if she is asked to, so today and the last couple of days she has just transported and restocked supplies. She stated she went to the floor on Monday (12/18/23) for a little bit after she transported. An interview on 12/20/23 at 4:15 PM, with the Administrator revealed LPN/Staff Development and the Director of Nurses (DON) does staffing and they should know who is scheduled and I am not sure if we had any call in's for today either. I thought the Transporter/CNA was going to help on the floor when she got finished transporting, so I did not know she was not. She stated she does not know what else to do, she has about 11 open positions total right now. An interview on 12/21/23 at 12:15 PM, with CNA #3 revealed there were two residents on A HALL that did not get their baths as scheduled yesterday, so we have been working to get those done this morning and do the men's baths today. She stated that some of the office staff came out to the floor after 3 PM yesterday, so that helped us get some more baths completed or it would have been more than just 2. She revealed that Resident #6 finally got her bath after they got help on the floor, but it was after 3 PM. She revealed she knows the resident wets herself often during the night and should have been washed off before dressing and putting a new brief on for the day. She stated it is just hard to do it all with just the two of us. An interview on 12/21/23 at 12:32 PM, with the DON confirmed that she has discussed staffing issues this morning and she is new, but she plans on looking at the acuity of the residents and trying to come to a solution to make sure we have enough staff. Record review of the facility census on day of entry 12/20/23 revealed the facility census was 80 and was licensed for 95 beds. Record review of the facility assessment updated on 8/22/23 revealed on page 20 that the facility had on average 86 residents that needed 1-2 staff assistance with dressing,46 residents that needed 1-2 staff assistance and 37 that was totally dependent on staff for bathing and 85 that needed 1-2 staff assistance with toileting; page 29 revealed that the facility required a restorative CNA 6 days per week (completed by the floor CNA) and 7-9 CNA's on day shift (adjusted per census) A record review of the facility staffing grid 12/6/23 - 12/20/23 revealed there were 5 days that the facility had less than 7 CNAs in the facility on day shift. Record review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure. Record review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/11/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 08, which indicates the resident is moderately cognitively impaired and in Section GG that the resident needed partial to moderate assistance with toileting, bath/shower, and personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #30's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #30's MDS with an ARD of 8/28/23 revealed in Section C a BIMS score of 11, which indicated the resident has moderate cognitive impairment and in Section GG that the resident needs substantial/maximal assistance with showers/bathe self.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify unresolved quality deficiencies, some of which were identified on previou...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify unresolved quality deficiencies, some of which were identified on previous surveys and ensure actions were taken to correct the deficiencies through the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) process as evidenced by deficiencies cited involving quality of care and sufficient staffing. This deficient practice affected 80 of the 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, QAPI (Quality Assessment Performance Improvement) Program with no revision date revealed .Purpose Statement: The purpose of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee is to create a system for improving the care for our residents . An interview on 12/21/23 at 11:05 AM, with the Administrator during record review and validation of F656 and F677 plan of correction with a completion date of 12/05/23 revealed six unsampled residents were audited by the Medical Records Director and Wound Care Nurse for proper ADL (Activity of Daily Living) to ensure cleanliness, shaving, and nailcare were provided 3 (three) times weekly times 2 (two) weeks, then weekly times 4 (four) weeks, and then monthly times 3 (three) months. The report of audit findings will be brought to the Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Committee for review and recommendations monthly for 4 (four) months starting on 11/30/23. The Administrator will be responsible for monitoring and compliance. The Administrator revealed that she had told the Auditors to make sure and include Resident #30 since he was the resident that was previously cited for not having his ADLs completed, but validated he was not included on the audit list for F677 and F656. She revealed the Director of Nurses is responsible for monitoring and compliance regarding the ADL deficiency (F677). An interview on 12/21/23 at 12:30 PM, with the Administrator revealed that she felt like the Quality Assurance (QA) process was working and that the issue with residents not getting the ADLs just occurred this past weekend when the facility had staffing issues. An interview post survey on 12/22/23 at 10:00 AM, with the Administrator revealed she is responsible for QA in the facility. She stated that during the rounds that were being completed for their plan of correction two residents were found with ADL issues and we had staff take care of them immediately. She stated that she found Resident #30 needed nail care on a round that she made and then another resident was found to need a shower on another day's rounds. She revealed that even after finding residents with ADL issues during the rounds, they have completed the weekly rounds and have gone to monthly rounds. Record review of the QAPI meeting minutes from 11/30/23 revealed that Audits on 6 residents for proper ADL to ensure cleanliness, shaving and nailcare were listed but no findings were documented or listed as discussion.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidenced by: 1) not posting signage for visitors to have knowledge that the building was in a COVID-19 outbreak and failed to identify signs and symptoms of illness for two (2) of six (6) survey days and 2) failed to post signage on isolated residents room doors indicating TBP (transmission-based precautions) for four (4) of four (4) resident rooms on isolation. Resident #55, Resident #280, Resident #281 and Resident #282 Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Covid-19 Policy and Procedures with a revision date of 5/12/23, revealed . Source Control / Masking: . For all PUI (persons under investigation), Quarantine and Isolation rooms: Post signs on the door or wall outside of the resident room that clearly describe the type of precautions needed and PPE (personal protective equipment). Also revealed under, Core Principles of Covid-19 Infection Prevention . Instructional signage throughout the facility and proper visitor education on Covid-19 signs and symptoms, infection control precautions, and other applicable facility practices (e.g., use of face covering or mask, specified entries, exits and routes to designated areas, hand hygiene) . Facility should provide guidance (e.g., posted signs at entrances) about recommended actions for visitors who have a positive viral test for Covid-19, symptoms of Covid-19 or have had close contact with someone with Covid-19 Record review of the facility policy titled, Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions with a revision date of September 2022 revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 5. When a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions, appropriate notification is placed on the room entrance door and on the front of the chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and the type of precaution. a. The signage informs the staff of the type of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) precaution(s), instructions for use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), and/or instructions to see a nurse before entering the room. On initial entry to the facility on [DATE] at 10:08 AM, the Survey Agent (SA) observed there were no signs announcing to visitors not to enter the facility with signs and symptoms of illness or exposure to Covid-19. A chalkboard was located next to the front entrance that read, Covid-19 cases in the building: 4 (four), mask not mandatory at this time. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 10/30/23 at 10:16 AM, revealed they had two (2) residents with Covid-19 in the facility. She revealed the Covid-19 outbreak started on 10/3/23 with the staff and 10/10/23 with the residents. She revealed a total of seven (7) staff members and 11 residents have tested positive for Covid-19 during the outbreak. An observation of Resident # 280's door on 10/30/23 at 10:19 AM, revealed PPE hanging on the door. There was no isolation sign to notify the staff or visitors what type of precautions were needed or the required PPE. An interview with the Respiratory Therapist (RT) on 10/30/23 at 10:21 AM, revealed she was unsure what type of isolation precaution Resident #280 was ordered. She confirmed there should be a sign on the door to notify visitors and staff of the type of precaution and the PPE required to prevent the spread of infection. An interview with the Front Desk Receptionist on 10/30/23 at 2:42 PM, confirmed that the facility does not have signs posted to notify visitors, if they were experiencing signs of illness or exposure to Covid-19, not to enter the facility. She revealed they used to have a screening process where visitors could sign in and answer questions related to symptoms or exposure, but they stopped that several months ago. An observation of B-Hall on 10/30/23 at 10:35 AM, revealed Resident # 55, Resident #280, Resident #281 and Resident #282 with PPE hanging on the doors and no isolation signs to indicate the residents were on TBP (transmission-based precautions). An observation and interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 10/30/23 at 10:38 AM, confirmed that Residents # 55, Resident #280, Resident #281 and Resident #282 did not have an isolation sign on the door that indicated the residents were in transmission-based precautions. She revealed the purpose of having a sign on the residents' door was to notify the staff and visitors of the infection and what type of PPE they should wear to prevent the spread of infection. An observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) # 2 on 10/30/23 at 10:52 AM, while dressing out in PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for Resident #281 revealed she applied a gown, surgical mask, and gloves. Interview inquired how she knew what type of PPE to apply, since there was no sign on the door. CNA #2 stated, I just put on what they have on the door (PPE). An interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 10/31/23 at 3:25 PM, confirmed the facility had no screening process on entrance despite the facility being in Covid-19 outbreak status. She revealed that she followed the facility Corporate Policy for Infection Control, and they were told screening was no longer required. She revealed they were testing the residents and staff only if they showed signs of illness. The IP acknowledged posting signs visible to the visitors was a good idea and should be done to prevent the spread of infection. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/01/23 at 3:05 PM, revealed it was important to post TBP (transmission-based precaution) signage along with the type of PPE required so that the infection was not transmitted to other residents or staff. She confirmed that the facility did not have entrance signage or any type of screening process for visitors experiencing signs and symptoms of illness, or exposure not to enter the building. She confirmed these measures should be in place to prevent the transmission of infection. Resident #55 Record review of Resident # 55's admission Record revealed an admission date of 2/07/23 with medical diagnoses that included Seizures, Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status and Persistent Vegetative State. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/11/23 revealed, under section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicates Resident #55 was unable to complete the interview. Record review of Resident #55's Care Plans revealed, 10/22/23-I tested positive for covid Intervention/Task . Isolation Precautions: . droplet . Resident #280 Record review of Resident #280's admission Record revealed an admission date of 10/23/23 with medical diagnoses that included Enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Unspecified Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Record review of Resident #280's Order Summary Report revealed orders dated 10/23/23, Clarithromycin oral tablet 500 MG (milligrams) give 1 (one) tablet by mouth two times daily related to Enterocolitis Due to Clostridium Difficile, Not Specified As Recurrent for 14 days . Metronidazole oral tablet 500 MG (milligrams) give 1 (one) tablet by mouth every 8 hours related to Enterocolitis Due To Clostridium Difficile, No Specified As Recurrent for 30 days . Vancomycin HCL (Hydrochloride) Oral Capsule 250 MG (milligram) give 1 (one) capsule by mouth every 6 hours related to Enterocolitis Due To Clostridium Difficile, No Specified As Recurrent for 30 days. Record review of the Care Plans for Resident # 280 revealed, I was admitted with Dx (diagnosis) of C. Difficile (Clostridium Difficile). Also revealed under, Tasks . Contact Isolation . Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 10/30/23 revealed under section C, a BIMS score of 15, which indicates Resident # 280 is cognitively intact. Resident # 281 Record review of the admission Record for Resident # 281 revealed an admission date of 10/19/23 and medical diagnoses that included Enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile, Cerebral Infarction, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Left Upper Extremity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Bronchus or Lung. Record review of the Care Plans for Resident # 281 revealed, I tested positive for COVID 10/23/23. Record review of MDS with an ARD of 10/26/23 revealed under section C, a BIMS score of 11, which indicates Resident #281 is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #282 Record review of Resident # 282's admission Record revealed an admission date of 10/16/23 with medical diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Scabies, Acute Bronchitis, Atrial Fibrillation and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Record review of Resident # 282's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 10/28/23, Droplet Precautions every shift for MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) in sputum. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 10/23/23 revealed under section C, a BIMS score of 14, which indicates Resident #282 was cognitively intact.
Jul 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan for a resident requiring two-person assistance with bath...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan for a resident requiring two-person assistance with bathing and personal hygiene was followed for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled. Resident #2. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 10/2022 with a reviewed date of January 2023, revealed under Policy Statement: A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on 04/27/22 documented the following: Focus: The resident has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to anoxic brain damage. Interventions/Tasks: BATHING/SHOWERING: The resident is (dependent) on two (2) staff to provide bath/shower) and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: The resident is (extensive assistance) of two (2) staff for repositioning and turning in bed. On 07/18/23 at 10:25 AM, an interview with Nursing Aide (NA), revealed that she gave baths/showers on A- plus hall to all residents in even numbered rooms yesterday which was Monday, July 17, 2023. This NA revealed that she gave the showers first and when all were completed, she did the bed baths. NA stated, I do bed baths and showers by myself. NA also confirmed that she had given Resident #2 a full bed bath the day before by herself with no one else present in the room with her. On 07/18/23 at 10:30 AM, an observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, revealed that there was supposed to be a CNA working alongside Nursing Aides. CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor and that her hair was matted and unbrushed. CNA also revealed that Resident #2 required significant assistance and that there should always be 2 people bathing Resident #2. During an interview on 07/19/23 at 9:45 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that Resident #2 required extensive assistance of two staff members to provide bathing and shower needs and she confirmed that it was documented in Resident's Care Plan. DON revealed that the Nursing Aide (NA) was not supposed to be giving Resident #2 a bed bath by herself since her care plan was documented for two persons assist. She confirmed that there was no way the resident could be thoroughly cleaned if the NA completed the bed-bath by herself. DON revealed that this resident would require two people to turn and bathe to really get her clean. An interview on 07/19/23 at 10:05 AM, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse revealed that she was responsible for developing the comprehensive care plan. She revealed the care plan was developed to make sure the staff knew how to take care of the residents and that this resident required a two person assist for proper care. On 07/19/23 at 3:35 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 3 revealed that the CNAs had I-Pads to chart on. She revealed that they would log in to (Proper name of computer software), and could see Resident's Care Plans, including any updates and new orders. She revealed that the CNAs should always know exactly how to take care of each resident here in the facility. On 07/19/23 at 4:15 PM, Administrator confirmed that if the NA had given a bed bath to Resident #2 without assistance, then the Care Plan was not followed. She also revealed that the Nursing Aides were supposed to be teamed up with a Certified Nursing Assistant and that bed baths and showers should never be completed by a Nursing Aide alone. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record documented admission Date of 04/27/2022. Resident #2 was admitted with the following diagnoses to include: Anoxic Brain Damage, Seizures, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Bipolar Disorder, Muscle Weakness, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received services by qualified staff to maintain good grooming, bathing and personal hygiene needs for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled. Resident #2. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy with revision date of March 2018 entitled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revealed, Policy Statement . Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. On 07/18/23 at 10:05 AM, observed Resident #2 lying in bed with eyes open. She was non-verbal and unable to make her needs known. State Agent (SA) observed a white crusty substance to the right side of her mouth and right chin area and a mild body odor was noted. Resident's hair was observed as disheveled and matted. On 07/18/23 at 10:20 AM, an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, revealed that residents in even numbered rooms received baths every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and residents in odd numbered rooms received their baths on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. On 07/18/23 at 10:25 AM, an interview with Nursing Aide (NA), revealed that she had completed the Certified Nursing Assistant Program, had passed her written Certification Test on 06/13/23, had failed her skills test and was scheduled to retake her skills test in August to get her certification. She revealed that she gave baths/showers on A plus hall to all residents in even numbered rooms yesterday which was Monday, July 17, 2023. This NA revealed that she gave the showers first and when this was completed, she completed the bed baths. NA stated, I do bed baths and showers all by myself. She also revealed that someone was supposed to always be with her when taking care of residents, but they were not. This NA confirmed that Resident #2's hair was unbrushed and matted up and confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor. NA also confirmed that she had given Resident #2 a full bed bath the day before by herself with no one else present in the room with her. On 07/18/23 at 10:30 AM, an interview with CNA #1, revealed that there was supposed to be a Certified Nursing Assistant working alongside Nursing Assistants until they received their certification. CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor and that her hair was matted and unbrushed. CNA #1 revealed that Resident #2 was frequently resistant to care and often slapped them back with her hands blocking them from giving the care she needed. CNA #1 also revealed that the NA should always ask for help with residents. On 07/18/23 at 10:35 AM, an interview with the NA revealed that this resident was often resistant to care. She confirmed that her hair was messy but when they tried to brush it, resident would lift her hands up to stop them from brushing it. This NA revealed that she should have asked for help with Resident #2 and not given her a bed bath without a Certified Nursing Assistant present. On 07/18/23 at 10:45 AM, an interview with Administrator (ADM), revealed that the Nursing Assistants who had not received their certification were required to be overseen by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) or Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs). ADM stated, They were supposed to work together. Administrator revealed that Nursing Assistant (NA) had passed the written certification test; but had failed her first skills test and was rescheduled to take it again. On 07/18/23 at 11:15 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 in Resident #2's room, revealed that she was working on A-Hall this shift. She confirmed that Resident #2 had disheveled, matted hair, and a mild body odor. RN #1 stated, It doesn't appear that she had a bath yesterday based on the smell. An interview on 07/19/23 at 9:45 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the Nursing Assistants (NAs) were supposed to be supervised by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and she confirmed that the NA was not supposed to be giving Resident #2 a bed bath by herself since her needs were documented for two persons assist. She confirmed that there was no way the resident could be thoroughly cleaned if she completed the bed-bath by herself. The DON revealed that this would require two people to turn and really get her clean. On 07/20/23 at 4:15 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, revealed that the Nursing Aides who have not passed the CNA program could pass out ice, change bed linens, make beds; but were not supposed to give baths or showers to residents without a CNA or Nurse present. Record review of Resident #2's Documentation Survey Report under Tasks: Interventions and Tasks in Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that she received a bed bath on 07/17/23 completed by Nursing Assistant. It was also documented under Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-Bathing the numbers four (4) and two (2) which represented the following: 4-Total Dependence and 2-Two-person physical assist. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record documented admission Date of 04/27/2022. Resident #2 was admitted with the following diagnoses to include: Anoxic Brain Damage, Seizures, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Bipolar Disorder, Muscle Weakness, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/23/2023 under Section C documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 99 which indicated resident was unable to complete the interview.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing numbers to assist the residents in getting the care they needed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing numbers to assist the residents in getting the care they needed to maintain good grooming, bathing and personal hygiene needs for one (1) of three (3) days of survey. Findings include: The Administrator revealed that they had no policy on Nursing Assistant staffing; but provided the following typed statement on Company Letterhead: After completing the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) class, The Nurse Assistant is scheduled on the unit teamed with a Certified Nursing Assistant. They are overseen by the Nurse working the cart and Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor. This letter was typed up, dated 7/18/2023 and signed by Administrator. On 07/18/23 at 10:05 AM, observed Resident #2 lying in bed with eyes open. She was non-verbal and unable to make her needs known. State Agent (SA) observed a white crusty substance to the right side of her mouth and right chin area and a mild body odor was noted. Resident's hair was observed as disheveled and matted. On 07/18/23 at 10:25 AM, an interview with Nursing Aide (NA), revealed that she had completed the Certified Nursing Assistant Program, had passed her written Certification Test on 06/13/23, had failed her skills test and was scheduled to retake her skills test in August to get her certification. She revealed that she gave baths/showers on A plus hall to all residents in even numbered rooms yesterday which was Monday, July 17, 2023. This NA revealed that she gave the showers first and when this was completed, she completed the bed baths. NA stated, I do bed baths and showers all by myself. She also revealed that someone was supposed to always be with her when taking care of residents, but they were not because there wasn ' t enough staff. This NA confirmed that Resident #2's hair was unbrushed and matted up and confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor. NA also confirmed that she had given Resident #2 a full bed bath the day before by herself with no one else present in the room with her. On 07/18/23 at 10:30 AM, an interview with CNA #1, revealed that there was supposed to be a Certified Nursing Assistant working alongside Nursing Assistants until they received their certification. CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor and that her hair was matted and unbrushed. CNA also revealed that there should always be two (2) people bathing Resident #2; and stated, We don't always have enough staff. CNA #1 revealed that Resident #2 was frequently resistant to care and often slapped them back with her hands blocking them from giving the care she needed. On 07/18/23 at 10:45 AM, an interview with Administrator (ADM), revealed that the Nursing Assistants who had not received their certification were required to be overseen by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) or Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs). ADM stated, They were supposed to work together. Administrator revealed that Nursing Assistant (NA) had passed the written certification test; but had failed her first skills test and was rescheduled to take it again. On 07/18/23 at 11:15 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 in Resident #2's room, revealed that she was working on A-Hall this shift. She confirmed that Resident #2 had disheveled, matted hair, and a mild body odor. RN #1 stated, It doesn't appear that she had a bath yesterday based on the smell. An interview on 07/19/23 at 9:45 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that the Nursing Assistants (NAs) were supposed to be supervised by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and she confirmed that the NA was not supposed to be giving Resident #2 a bed bath by herself since her needs were documented for two persons assist. She confirmed that there was no way the resident could be thoroughly cleaned if she completed the bed-bath by herself. The DON revealed that this would require two people to turn and really get her clean. On 07/20/23 at 4:00 PM, an interview with CNA #2, revealed that when the NAs completed their classes, they were paired with a CNA. She revealed that the NAs who had not passed the CNA classes were not supposed to give baths or showers without a CNA or Nurse with them; but the NAs were providing care without supervision at this time due to staffing issues. CNA #2 revealed that if they were fully staffed for the day, then the NAs could be paired with a CNA. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record documented admission Date of 04/27/2022. Resident #2 was admitted with the following diagnoses to include: Anoxic Brain Damage, Seizures, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Bipolar Disorder, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing assistants (NA) have the competencies and skill sets to provide care and respond to resident's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing assistants (NA) have the competencies and skill sets to provide care and respond to resident's individualized needs for one (1) of six (6) residents sampled. Resident #2. Findings include: Administrator revealed that they had no policy on Nursing Assistant Competencies; but provided the following typed statement on Company Letterhead: After completing the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) class, The Nurse Assistant is scheduled on the unit teamed with a Certified Nursing Assistant. They are overseen by the Nurse working the cart and Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor. This letter was typed up, dated 7/18/2023 and signed by Administrator. On 07/18/23 at 10:05 AM, observed Nursing Assistant (NA) enter unsampled resident's room by herself. An interview with Nursing Assistant (NA), on 07/18/23 at 10:25 AM, revealed that she had just finished giving a bed bath to this unsampled resident. NA revealed that she had completed the Certified Nursing Assistant Program, had passed her written Certification Test on 06/13/23, had failed her skills test and was scheduled to retake her skills test in August to get her certification. NA stated that she gave baths/showers on A plus hall to all residents in even numbered rooms yesterday which was Monday, 7/17/23. She was giving showers and bed baths to all residents in the odd numbered rooms today. This NA revealed that she did the showers first and when this was completed, she did the bed baths. NA stated, I do bed baths and showers by myself. She also revealed that since she was not certified, someone was supposed to always be with her when taking care of residents, but they were not. This NA confirmed that Resident #2's hair was unbrushed and matted up and she confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor. NA also confirmed that she had given Resident #2 a full bed bath the day before by herself with no one else present in the room with her and confirmed that she should have had another person with her to be able to give a complete bath due to the resident's extensive care needs. An interview with CNA #1 on 07/18/23 at 10:30 AM, revealed that there was supposed to be a Certified Nursing Assistant working alongside Nursing Assistants until they received their certification. CNA #1 confirmed that Resident #2 had a mild body odor and that her hair was matted and unbrushed. CNA also revealed that there should always be two (2) people bathing Resident #2; and stated, We don't always have enough staff. CNA #1 also revealed that the NA should always ask for help with residents. In an interview and record review of the Nursing Assistant List provided by the Administrator on 7/18/23 at 10:45 AM, revealed that Nursing Assistant passed her written test following completion of the Certified Nursing Assistant Program. The Administrator revealed that Nursing Assistant failed the skills test on 06/13/23 and was rescheduled to take the skills test again on August 25, 2023. The Administrator confirmed that the Nursing Assistant was not certified at the time of the complaint survey. Record review of Resident #2's Documentation Survey Report under Tasks: Interventions and Tasks in Electronic Medical Record documented that she received a bed bath on 07/17/23 completed by Nursing Assistant. It was also documented under Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-Bathing the numbers four (4) and two (2) which represented the following: 4-Total Dependence and 2-Two-person physical assist. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record documented admission Date of 04/27/2022. Resident #2 was admitted with the following diagnoses to include: Anoxic Brain Damage, Seizures, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia, Bipolar Disorder, Muscle Weakness, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/23/2023 under Section C documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 99 which indicated resident was unable to complete the interview. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on 04/27/22 documented the following: Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to anoxic brain damage. Interventions/Tasks: BATHING/SHOWERING: The resident is (dependent) on two (2) staff to provide bath/shower) and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: The resident is (extensive assistance) of two (2) staff for repositioning and turning in bed.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure cooking equipment was clean as evidenced by the deep fryer and oven being dirty for one (1) of two (2)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure cooking equipment was clean as evidenced by the deep fryer and oven being dirty for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Equipment revised 9/2017, revealed Policy Statement: All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order .1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's directions and training materials . 2. All staff members will be properly trained in the cleaning and maintenance of all equipment . 3. All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. State Agent (SA) entered the kitchen on 7/18/23 at 9:00 AM and toured with the District Manager in training and the Dietary Manager (DM) an observation of the deep fryer revealed black oil and a crumb-like substance floating on the oil and thick crumb build-up along the sides of the fryer. The District Manager in training revealed that's on the to-do list for tonight. The DM revealed the oil in the fryer is supposed to be changed weekly and the fryer is wiped down daily after each use. He confirmed that the fryer was dirty, and the oil hadn't been changed in a while. He confirmed that the outside of the fryer had not been wiped down after preparation of meals in a while due to the large buildup of food particles. An observation of the oven revealed a build-up of dark debris particles covering the bottom of the oven. The DM confirmed the oven was dirty and needed to be cleaned and he wasn't sure when it was last cleaned. He confirmed we don't really use the oven much, but it still needs to be cleaned. The DM revealed the kitchen equipment is supposed to be clean to prevent any possible cross-contamination and confirmed the fryer and oven were not clean and that could be a fire hazard. An interview on 7/18/23 at 9:15 AM Dietary Worker #1 revealed the fryer is supposed to be kept clean and wiped down and the oil is supposed to be changed on Friday, she revealed that she didn't do it this past Friday because she was off work, and she has been the only one changing it. She revealed that the oil was old and black and there were thick food particles in the oil and the insides of the fryer and the along the side of the fryer. An interview on 7/18/23 at 9:25 AM the DM revealed he is responsible for ensuring the fryer and the oven is cleaned along with all kitchen equipment and he will make sure this gets cleaned right away. An interview on 7/19/23 at 3:50 PM the District Manager in training revealed, I know what the problem was regarding the fryer being dirty, she revealed she asked the staff yesterday if they knew how to properly clean the fryer and no one knew. State Agent inquired if there were instructions on how to clean the fryer, the District Manager in training revealed, we don't have instructions, but every manager should know and train the employees and this had not been done.
Mar 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to answer questions accurately, on a Preadmission Screening (PAS) Summary and Physician Certification, (Level...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to answer questions accurately, on a Preadmission Screening (PAS) Summary and Physician Certification, (Level I PAS), to generate a request for a psychiatric assessment to be completed, for a resident with active psychiatric diagnoses, to determine the need for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for not having a PASRR Level II. Resident #9 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), Adopted from Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 RAI 2018 Case mix, revised on 7/18/18 and Reviewed on 8/11/20, revealed, Health-related Quality of Life - All individuals who are admitted to a Medicaid certified nursing facility must have a Level I PASRR completed to screen for possible mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID), mental retardation (MR) in federal regulation/developmental disability (DD), or related conditions regardless of the resident's method of payment. Record review of Resident #9's admission Record, revealed a nursing facility admission date of 6/17/19. The Diagnosis Report revealed the admission diagnoses of Schizophrenia Unspecified, Major Depressive Disorder Single Episode Unspecified, and Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Unspecified, all with an onset date of 6/17/19. Record review of the PAS SUMMARY AND PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION, (Level I PAS), that indicated a PAS date, for submission, of 08/30/2019, completed for Resident #9, revealed the answer, no, to the questions that asked, Person has a diagnosis of a major mental illness? Person has a recent history of a mental illness? The Level I PAS also revealed the answer, yes, to the question that asked, Person is in need of nursing care for terminal illness. Record review of the Order Summary Report, for a physician's admission order dated 6/17/19 (discontinued), revealed a physician's order that noted I certify that post-hospital Nursing Facility/Skilled Nursing Facility (NF/SNF) services are required to be given on an in-patient basis because of the resident's need for skilled nursing or rehab care on a continuing basis for the condition(s) which required an in-patient hospital admission prior to transfer to the NF/SNF under the attending services of (physician's name). Record review of the Summary of Findings Report, dated 06/17/19, from an older History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/26/18 from the state mental health agency that completed the psychiatric assessment to determine the need for a Level II screening, for Resident #9, revealed You were ruled out from further assessments through the PASRR Program: There is not sufficient evidence of Serious Mental Illness. The Summary of Findings Report did not contain psychiatric documentation from Resident #9's nursing facility admission that began 6/17/19. The Summary of Findings Report noted, Psychiatric History: The submitted H&P dated 12/26/2018 does not document a psychiatric diagnosis as the newest admission to the facility does that is dated 06/17/19. Due to an absence of a psychiatric diagnosis on the H&P with symptoms/behaviors, (Resident #9's proper name) may benefit from an initial psychiatric evaluation for clarification of diagnosis and treatment planning. Record review of the response letter titled, PASRR NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FROM PASRR, from the state mental health agency that completed the psychiatric assessment to determine the need for a Level II screening for Resident #9, revealed, Based on the PASRR evaluation completed for you, you do not meet the criteria for serious mental illness or a developmental condition and therefore not subject to PASRR requirements at this time. An interview on 3/23/22 at 03:59 PM, with Social Services, revealed the copy of the Level II PASRR Summary of Findings Report and the response letter titled, PASRR NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FROM PASRR, received from the state mental health agency that assessed Resident #9 for need of a Level II Screening, was accepted by the nursing facility as the completed Level II assessment for Resident #9's nursing facility admission dated 6/17/19. Social Services confirmed the psychiatric diagnoses documentation that was on the Summary of Findings Report was not accurate and that the diagnosis was pulled from an older H&P and that it was not the psychiatric diagnoses documentation from Resident #9's nursing facility admission dated 06/17/19, and that there were incorrect answers to the questions on the PAS SUMMARY AND PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION, Level I PAS, that asked, Person is in need of nursing care for terminal illness? Person has a diagnosis of a major mental illness? Person has a recent history of a mental illness? An interview on 3/24/22 at 1:00 PM, with the Administrator, confirmed Resident #9 was possibly at risk of not benefiting from adequate mental health treatment(s), in the nursing facility, from possible recommendations of mental health treatment(s) and/or intervention(s), that would have been based on possible recommendations made by the state mental health agency responsible for completion of the Level II Screening, due to the Level I PAS not being completed accurately for Resident #9.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0646 (Tag F0646)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record reviews, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a Change in Status Request Form, for submission to the state mental health agency, to generate a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a Change in Status Request Form, for submission to the state mental health agency, to generate a request for a resident assessment to determine the need for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Screening, for a resident who had two physical changes and a Change in Status Forms were not completed or submitted for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed for not having a PASRR Level II. Resident #61 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), Adopted from Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 RAI 2018 Case mix, revised on 7/18/18 and reviewed on 8/11/20, revealed, Health-related Quality of Life - A resident with mental illness (MI) or intellectual disability/developmental disability (ID/DD), the nursing home is required to notify the State mental health authority, intellectual disability or developmental disability authority (depending on which operates in their State) in order to notify them of the resident's change in status. Section 1919(e)(7)(B)(iii) of the Social Security Act requires the notification or referral for a significant change. Record review of the Preadmission SCREENING (PAS) SUMMARY AND PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION, with a PAS date of 04/18/2017, revealed the answer, yes, to the questions that asked, Person is in need of nursing care for terminal illness? Person has a diagnosis of a major mental illness? Record review of the Diagnosis Report, for Resident #61, revealed the psychiatric diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Unspecified and Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Unspecified, both with an onset date of 3/22/17. Record review of the response letter titled, NOTICE OF NEGATIVE LEVEL I SCREEN OUTCOME, dated 4/19/17, from the mental health authority that assessed the PAS Level I for the requirement of a PASRR Level II, revealed, The PASRR Level I review Identification Screen, reviewed by (agency name removed), revealed that nursing facility placement is appropriate for you. Record review was attempted to reveal documentation from the state mental health authority that showed the nursing facility received a waiver that noted no PASRR Level II was needed, due to Resident #61 was terminally ill, but it was not available. Record review of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 3/20/20, for Resident #61, revealed, Discharge from Hospice. Record review, of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 8/16/21, revealed, Admit to (hospice agency name removed). Record review was attempted of the Significant Change in Status Request Forms, for Resident #61, for review of the recommendations, from the state mental health agency, regarding the need of a psychiatric assessment to determine the need for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II for Resident #61, for the physical changes in status, with hospice services, that were discontinued on 03/20/20, and hospice services that resumed on 08/16/21. The Significant Change in Status Request Forms were not located. An interview with Social Services on 03/23/22 at 3:59 PM, revealed her confirmation that she did not complete or submit the two Change in Status Request Forms for Resident #61, when the hospice services were discontinued on 03/20/20, and when the hospice services were resumed on 08/16/21. An interview on 03/24/22 at 1:00 PM, with the Administrator confirmed Resident #61 was possibly at risk of not benefiting from adequate mental health treatment(s), in the nursing facility, from possible recommendations of mental health treatment(s) and/or intervention(s), that would have been based on possible recommendations made by the state mental health agency responsible for completion of the Level II Screening, due to the Change in Status Request Form was not submitted for Resident #61 when the hospice services were discontinued on 03/20/20. The Administrator also confirmed that the Change in Status Request Form should have also been submitted for the resumption of hospice services on 08/16/21 for Resident #61.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident who smokes for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #39. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of December 2016 revealed under, Policy Statement- A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: #10-Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process and #12- The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS). On 3/22/22 at 8:30 AM, an observation revealed Resident #39 smoking in the designated smoking area supervised by staff. An interview on 3/23/22 at 9:40 AM, with Resident #39 confirmed that he is a smoker and has been smoking since the age of 12. Record review revealed that Resident #39 did not have a care plan for smoking and that he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a History and Physical dated 11/15/21 that stated, Current every day smoker. An Interview on 3/23/22 at 9:50 AM, with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse confirmed that Resident #39 did not have a smoking care plan. She revealed they get their information on developing care plans from referral paperwork and nursing admission charting. The MDS nurse confirmed the hospital referral dated 11/14/21 revealed the resident is a current every day smoker. She confirmed that this information should have triggered a smoking care plan for Resident #39 and that she overlooked it. An interview on 3/23/22 at 10:20 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that all smokers should have a care plan. She revealed that the care plan lets the staff know about safety measures for the resident and this helps prevent the resident from getting burned or other injury. She revealed that the resident had a care plan before he went to the hospital, and it did not get replaced on readmission. The DON confirmed that he should have a care plan for smoking.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, and record review the facility failed to appropriately administer medications for one (1) of two (2) residents observed for percutaneous ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, and record review the facility failed to appropriately administer medications for one (1) of two (2) residents observed for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) medication administration. Resident #178. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube revised November 2018, revealed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube. Steps in the procedure: #12. Administer medication by gravity flow. An observation on 03/22/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 administered PEG tube medications to Resident #178. RN #2 crushed and mixed each of the five (5) medications separately in medication cups with water. RN #2 did not administer the medications by gravity flow. She pulled up each medication separately in the 60 cc syringe and pushed the medications into the enteral tube. She pushed the water flushes with a syringe between each medication and after all medications were administered. An interview on 3/24/22 at 11:10 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that PEG medications and anything else given via PEG should be by gravity flow. The DON confirmed that RN # 2 did not follow the facility policy for medication administration by PEG tube. She stated the facility has provided inservice education on PEG medication administration and used the facility policy to conduct the in-service. A telephone interview on 3/24/22 at 12:15 PM, with RN #2 revealed that she was not aware that she was not supposed to push the medications when administering by a PEG. She stated that she has been a nurse for 13 years and did not know this. She stated that she had not had any in-service education concerning PEG medication administration. A telephone interview on 3/24/22 at 2:30 PM, with the Consultant Pharmacist revealed that gravity flow is preferable. He stated that pushing the medications could force the tube out of place, cause irritation or push air into the stomach. Record review revealed the facility provided an inservice education with a topic titled, Check Placement of PEG tube and one medication at a time with flush. Administer each medication by gravity flow. The inservice attendance sheet dated 03/07/22 revealed RN #2 was in attendance at this inservice and signed the in-service sheet.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide bath...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide baths and transfers for a resident that is dependent on staff for their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (1) of 19 residents observed. Resident #44. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting with a revision date of March 2018 revealed under the policy statement, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living, independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. On 03/21/22 at 07:33 AM, an interview and observation of Resident #44 revealed she was lying in bed alert, awake and oriented with disheveled, greasy hair. She revealed she was the last on the bath schedule due to having to be lifted with a lift and that she is suppose to have a bath on Mondays but sometimes it gets pushed to Tuesday or not at all. Resident #44 revealed she can't remember the last time she got up in the wheelchair. She has told the staff that she wants to get up, but they will tell me they are short staffed, and that they do not have anyone that is certified to use the lift. We've had days where the only CNA we had were ones that were in training. An interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 on 3/23/22 at 8:45 AM, revealed that bath days are Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays for even rooms and if the resident is bed bound then they get a bed bath. She has some residents that refuse a bath but Resident #44 is not one of them. CNA #1 revealed the facility has been short staffed, so some things they do get put off due to not having enough people and confirmed this resident must be lifted with a 2 person assist lift. Record review of documented baths and transfers revealed Resident #44 has had two baths and two transfers between the dates of 3/11/22 through 3/21/22 with no refusals documented. According to the bath schedule for Resident #44 she should have received five baths during that time frame. Record review of the admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the medical diagnoses revealed the following diagnoses: morbid obesity, fusion of spine cervical region and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #44's most recent accepted Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/4/22, Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicates the resident has moderate cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide hydration to a re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide hydration to a resident as evidenced by no water observed in the resident's room for two (2) of four (4) days of survey observations. Resident #6 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hydration Management, with no revision date revealed under Standard that All residents will be provided with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and nutritional status. An observation on 03/21/22 at 09:53 AM, revealed Resident #6 was alert and pleasantly confused. Her eyes appeared sunken, and she asked for water twice while the State Agency (SA) was interviewing her roommate. During this observation, Resident # 6's roommate, Resident #44 revealed that Resident #6 asked for water a lot. This observation revealed there was a half empty cup of water sitting on Resident #6's night stand that appeared to be thickened water but was out of reach of the resident. An observation on 3/22/22 at 9:00 AM, revealed that Resident #6 did not have a glass of water in her room. An observation on 3/23/22 at 8:40 AM, revealed there was no glass of water in Resident #6's room. An interview on 3/23/22 at 8:45 AM, with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 revealed that Resident #6 can feed herself, but she has to be assisted to sit up. CNA #1 revealed that when she works she usually feeds her. CNA #1 revealed that the staff try to leave her water on her table, because she can reach it and drink it by herself. An interview on 3/23/22 at 9:05 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 confirmed that monitoring for dry mouth is listed on Resident #6's orders. LPN #2 confirmed that Resident #6 has to have thickened liquids and she revealed that the staff leave her a big cup of thickened liquid on her bedside table for her in the morning, lunch and afternoon. LPN #2 confirmed that the resident can reach her own water and self drink. LPN #2 revealed everyone is responsible for putting water out for the residents, but the nurses are the ones that add the thickening liquid. LPN #2 revealed she put Resident #6 a glass of water in her room this morning. LPN #2 observed and confirmed that the resident did not have any water in her room at that time and stated, I will take care of this, I'm not sure what is going on. Record review revealed that Resident #6 was admitted to hospice 11/19/21 and all labs and monthly weight monitoring were discontinued per Resident #6's physician. An observation on 3/24/22 at 9:10 AM of Resident #6 revealed there was a glass of thickened water on her bedside table, but the table was out of reach of the resident. An interview on 3/24/22 at 9:15 AM, with LPN #2 confirmed the water on the bedside table should always be within reach of the resident, so she can drink it when she wants to. LPN #2 revealed she would send a Hospitality Nurse Aide to push Resident #6's bedside table close enough to the resident so she can reach her water. An interview on 3/24/22 at 9:30, with the Registered Dietician (RD) revealed that Resident #6 has no limits on the amount of fluid intake she has daily. The RD revealed that for Resident #6's most current weight of 83.2 pounds, the resident should be receiving at least 1300 milliliters (ml) of water per day. An interview on 3/24/22 at 2:08 PM, with the Administrator, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the CNA's are not taught how to add thickener and the Administrator revealed that she does not recall CNA's ever adding thickener to liquids. The Administrator revealed that it is the responsibility of the nurses to provide Resident #6 with her thickened water. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Dysphagia, Constipation, Personal history of urinary tract infections and Senile Degeneration of the brain. Record review of Resident #6's Nutrition-fluids for the past 30 days revealed that Resident #6's daily fluid intake ranged from 360 ml to 960 ml for a 24 hours period. Record review of Resident #6's Electronic Medical Record (EMAR) and Electronic Treatment Record (ETAR) for the dates of 3/1/22 through 3/23/22 revealed there was a task titled, Interventions Anti-Psychotic Every Shift #7 Give Fluid, and was initialed by nursing staff every day. Record review of Resident #6's physicians order dated 12/17/21 revealed the following order; Regular diet Pureed texture, Honey Thickened consistency, Double portions (every) Q meal with no straws, sippy cup with each meal, Magic Cup three times a day (tid) with meals, provide fortified foods on each meal tray daily, Ice Cream on lunch & supper trays for 60 days. Record review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/29/21, Section G, revealed the resident needed extensive assistance with drinking. Record review of Resident #6's MDS with an ARD of 12/29/21 revealed Resident #6's Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 99, which indicates that the resident was unable to complete the interview.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to properly store, label and date foods in the refrigerator and freezer for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Fin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to properly store, label and date foods in the refrigerator and freezer for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods revised 9/2017, revealed per policy statement, All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) food code. Procedure #5 revealed all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. An observation of the standup freezer revealed an open, undated one fourth full bag of French fries. An observation of the refrigerator revealed nine (9) cups of fruit cocktail, 21 glasses of milk, six (6) serving bowls of lettuce, three (3) glasses of orange juice, one (1) glass of soy milk not dated or labeled and five and one half (5 1/2) boiled eggs in a bag opened, not dated and unlabeled. A large hunk of whitish colored meat wrapped in plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated. There was a ten-pound tube of ground beef on the second shelf from the bottom and a box of pork thawing on the bottom shelf of the refrigerator not in a container. Observed the bottom of the refrigerator covered with pink-red fluid. An interview on 3/21/22 at 8:35 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed that any food in the freezer that has been opened should be labeled and all foods in the refrigerator should be labeled and dated. The DM stated that food should be labeled and dated to prevent the possibility of spoilage and causing illness. The DM stated that the meat should be in a container when thawing to prevent contaminating everything. The DM stated that the hunk of meat was turkey used the day before. She confirmed it should be labeled and dated. An interview, on 3/24/22 at 1:50 PM with the Administrator (ADM) confirmed that foods in the freezer and refrigerator should be labeled and dated. She stated that if they are not the food could be spoiled. She stated, as for the meat thawing, she could not imagine this. The ADM who also serves as the Infection Preventionist stated they have not had any outbreaks related to gastrointestinal issues.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), $90,844 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 32 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $90,844 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 4 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 32 deficiencies at CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 28 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 95 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CORINTH, Mississippi.

How Does Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $90,844 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Mississippi average of $33,987. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

CORNERSTONE REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.