PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Pleasant Hills Community Living Center in Jackson, Mississippi has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #135 out of 200 nursing homes in the state, placing it in the bottom half, and #6 out of 11 facilities in Hinds County, meaning only five local options are better. While the facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from 10 in 2024 to 9 in 2025, the staffing rating is low at 2 out of 5 stars, and turnover is at 55%, which is average compared to other facilities in the state. The facility has incurred $68,630 in fines, which is concerning and indicates compliance problems. Specific incidents reported include a critical failure to supervise a vulnerable resident who exited the facility unnoticed for several hours, raising serious safety concerns, and a serious incident of resident-to-resident aggression that resulted in injury requiring pain medication. Additionally, there were concerns about insufficient staff during night shifts, which hindered proper care for residents. Overall, while there are some improvements in the facility's operations, these significant weaknesses raise important questions for families considering this nursing home for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #135/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $68,630 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
9 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's right...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0557
(Tag F0557)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to respectful, dignified care when they failed to apply the indwelling uri...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences by discontinuing the use of disp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents dependent on wheelchairs for mobility (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-on-resident physical abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene, specifically fingernail and toenail care during Activities of Daily Living ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to evaluate and analyze hazards and risks and failed to assess a resident following a documented fall for one (1) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to safely and securely store medications for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents: Resident #8.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to assess the resident population and identify resources needed to provide necessary day-to-day care and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were followed related to respect and dignity when a Certified Nurse Aide (C...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured when ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan intervention when an order changed related to accuchecks for one (1) of 20 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a safety smoking assessment for a resident to safeguard against the potential hazards for burns and/or fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter tubing was secured to prevent complications for one (1) of one (1) reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and date enteral feeding bags for thr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated and spoken to in a dignified and respectful manner for two (2) of four (4) sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was a vulnerable resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by failing to consistently ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for three (3) of 3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and facility's policy review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent for the use of bed rails for seven (7) of eighteen residents reviewed for bedrails....
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, facility investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity during care for one (1) of four (4) residents r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have staff to provide care to meet the needs of the residents for two (2) of 19 sampled residents. Resident #8 an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight (8) consecutive hours a day for eight (8) of 60 days reviewed. 5/6/23,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $68,630 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 22 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $68,630 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (8/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center Staffed?
CMS rates PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 20 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center?
PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 79 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in JACKSON, Mississippi.
How Does Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center Stick Around?
PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center Ever Fined?
PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER has been fined $68,630 across 4 penalty actions. This is above the Mississippi average of $33,765. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Pleasant Hills Com Liv Center on Any Federal Watch List?
PLEASANT HILLS COM LIV CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.