SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER

6520 SUNSCOPE DRIVE, OCEAN SPRINGS, MS 39564 (228) 875-1177
For profit - Limited Liability company 73 Beds COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES Data: November 2025 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#187 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Sunplex Sub-Acute Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns about the care provided. Ranked #187 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, they fall in the bottom half, and are last among the six nursing homes in Jackson County. While the facility is improving, reducing issues from nine in 2024 to three in 2025, there are still serious deficiencies, including critical incidents where a resident was left unattended in a transport van for over 16 hours and another resident was allowed to elope due to inadequate supervision. Staffing is below average with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 52%, which is roughly in line with the state average. Additionally, the facility has faced significant fines totaling $104,874, which is concerning as it is higher than 97% of nursing homes in Mississippi.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Mississippi
#187/200
Bottom 7%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
9 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$104,874 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 9 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Mississippi average (2.6)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $104,874

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 35 deficiencies on record

9 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1. On 9/17/25, Resident #1, who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six (6), and was identified by the facility as an elopement risk, was assisted out of the front door by a Dietary Aide (DA) who thought she was a visitor. She remained outside the facility for approximately 35 minutes, during which the DA left the facility parking lot at approximately 8:50 PM. Resident #1 was found at 9:05 PM knocking on the front entrance door. The facility's failure to provide supervision placed Resident #1 and other vulnerable residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC), which began on 9/17/25, when Resident #1 exited the facility. The State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator of the IJ on 9/23/25 at 2:00 PM and provided an IJ Template. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 9/18/25, the SA determined the IJ and SQC to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the IJ was removed as of 9/19/25 prior to the SA's entrance on 9/22/25. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Elopement/Unsafe Wandering Plan, dated February 7, 2012, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to protect the resident from harm while providing care in a manner that helps promote quality of life in a safe environment.Definitions.3. Elopement-Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization. A record review of the facility's investigation revealed on 9/17/2025, at 9:00 PM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1, identified that Resident #1 was not in the common area or in her room when she returned from her lunch break. The Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Nurse (RN/MDS) was in the facility and was notified that Resident #1 was not on her side of the building. The RN/MDS nurse immediately called a Code W (elopement) and initiated a search of the building and perimeter. CNA #2 found Resident #1 who was knocking on the front door at 9:05 PM while searching in her assigned area; Resident #1 was dressed appropriately for the weather and had her purse on her shoulder. Resident #1 was escorted back into the building with no issues of distress noted. The Administrator and the Director of Nurses (DON) were notified of the incident. The RN/MDS completed a body audit with no signs or symptoms of injury. The RN/MDS completed a head count of all current residents in the facility, and all residents were accounted for. She also notified the medical provider and Resident Representative (RR). The Administrator arrived at the facility and checked that all doors were functioning properly. The root cause analysis determined by the Administrator and DON found that Resident #1 followed a dietary employee while he was leaving at the end of his shift. It was determined through interviews that the dietary employee was unaware that Resident #1, was a resident and was under the impression that she was a visitor. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 9/16/25 with current diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy and vascular dementia. A record review of the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Interview MDS, dated 9/16/25, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. A record review of the local weather report revealed on 9/17/25 from 7:55 PM to 8:55 PM, the temperature was 83 degrees and clear.On 9/22/25 at 8:30 PM, during an observation of the facility and surrounding area, the facility is located approximately 925 feet from a four-lane highway and is situated within an industrial complex with multiple surrounding commercial buildings. A wooded area borders the south side of the property. The facility grounds include a paved parking lot with designated spaces for staff and visitors, and sidewalks providing access to the front entrance. Multiple exterior lights were observed around the building perimeter, including at the front entrance and doorways. There are no fencing or restricted barriers observed between the facility grounds and the surrounding industrial area.On 9/22/25 at 9:15 PM, during an interview with CNA #1, she confirmed that she was assigned to Resident #1 on 9/17/25. She reported that she last observed the resident sitting in the main lobby prior to leaving for her scheduled lunch break at approximately 8:30 PM. CNA #1 stated that when she returned from break around 9:00 PM, Resident #1 was not in her room or in the lobby. She immediately notified the RN/MDS nurse and other staff that the resident was missing, and a facility-wide search was initiated. At approximately 9:05 PM, CNA #2 located Resident #1 knocking on the facility's front door. CNA #1 confirmed that she was aware the resident was care-planned as an elopement risk, with 15-minute checks in place and identification in the wander book. She stated the facility followed its elopement policy, secured exits, and ensured all residents were accounted for. She further reported that after the incident, she was included in an in-service on elopement prevention and policies.On 9/22/25 at 9:25 PM, during an interview with CNA #2, she stated that on 9/17/25 while working on her unit, staff realized Resident #1 was not accounted for. CNA #2 explained that at approximately 9:00 PM, CNA #1 asked if she had seen Resident #1. When she confirmed she had not, the facility immediately implemented its elopement policy and all staff began searching the building and grounds. CNA #2 reported that she was aware Resident #1 was identified as an elopement risk in the wander book and wore a yellow bracelet. She began her search in the main lobby and near the front entrance of the facility. While checking that area at approximately 9:05 PM, she heard knocking at the front door. Upon opening the door, she identified Resident #1 outside the facility. She confirmed that the resident was appropriately dressed for the weather, carrying her purse, did not appear injured or distressed, and was safely escorted back inside. CNA #2 revealed that following the event, she observed the RN/MDS nurse complete a body audit and headcount of all residents. She further reported that she later participated in a staff in-service regarding the facility's elopement policy and procedures.On 9/23/25 at 11:20 AM, during an interview with Dietary Aide #1, he revealed that on 9/17/25, after completing his dietary shift, he clocked out and went to leave the building. He explained that he did not know the exit code, so he went to a nurses' station to obtain it. After entering the code at the front door, he exited the facility. At that time, an individual followed closely behind him and opened the door as he exited. Dietary Aide #1 reported that he did not recognize the person as a resident, as she was dressed in street clothes appropriate for the weather and was carrying a purse. He assumed she was a visitor leaving at the same time. The employee revealed that once he entered his father's car, both he and his father observed the woman attempt to get into a parked vehicle in the lot. When she discovered the car was locked, she returned to the facility's front entrance. He confirmed that later he learned that the individual was Resident #1. He stated he had previously received annual training on elopement prevention and resident identification but admitted he did not initially recognize Resident #1 as a resident due to her appearance and belongings. Following the incident, the employee confirmed he received re-education on the elopement policy, door security procedures, and how to identify and respond if a resident attempts to exit with staff or visitors.A record review of the Employee Time Cards revealed on 9/17/25 Dietary Employee #1 clocked out of the facility at 8:27 PM.On 9/23/25 at 1:32 PM, during an interview, the RN/MDS confirmed that on 9/17/25, at approximately 9:00 PM, she was informed that Resident #1 was missing from her unit. She immediately called a Code W (elopement). All staff secured the doors, conducted a head count of all residents, and began a facility-wide search. At approximately 9:05 PM, Resident #1 was located at the front door, knocking to be let back inside. The RN/MDS stated that following the event, she notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). Once all residents were accounted for, the resident's physician and RR were also notified. Resident #1 was assessed and had no injuries. She was observed to be dressed in a gray short-sleeved shirt, brown shorts, and sandals, with her purse on her shoulder and sunglasses on top of her head. The RN/MDS further explained that Resident #1 had previously been assessed as an elopement risk, and her name and information had been placed in the elopement books located at each nurses' station, the kitchen, and therapy department. She also wore a yellow elopement-risk bracelet. Following the incident, the resident's care plan was updated with new interventions.On 9/23/25 at 1:50 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, she confirmed that on 9/17/25 at approximately 9:00 PM, staff identified that Resident #1 was missing, and the MDS nurse immediately initiated a Code W (elopement). Staff secured all doors, conducted a head count, and began searching the building and perimeter. At approximately 9:05 PM, the resident was found knocking at the front door, appropriately dressed and without distress. A body audit revealed no injuries, and the medical provider and responsible representative were notified. The Administrator stated she verified the doors were functioning, interviewed involved staff and residents, and initiated in-services for all employees on elopement procedures before their next shift. The incident was reported to State Agency (SA) and the Attorney General's office, and an emergency Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting was held to implement corrective actions. These included door quality checks, alarms on exits, elopement drills on all shifts, wander assessments on all residents, and audits of care plans and elopement books. She further explained that the root cause analysis determined the resident had followed Dietary Aide#1 out of the building, as the employee mistakenly assumed the resident was a visitor.On 9/23/25 at 1:50 PM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that on 9/17/25 she was notified by the Administrator and RN/MDS that Resident #1 had been found outside the facility, knocking on the front door. The DON stated that the RN/MDS verified all residents were accounted for and notified the resident's physician and RR. Resident #1 was assessed with no injuries noted and was observed to be appropriately dressed in a gray short-sleeve shirt, brown shorts, sandals, with her purse on her shoulder and sunglasses on top of her head. The DON further confirmed that Resident #1 had previously been assessed as an elopement risk, with her name and information placed in the elopement books located at each nurses' station, the kitchen, and therapy department. The resident also wore a yellow elopement-risk bracelet. Following the incident, the resident's care plan was updated with additional interventions.The facility submitted a corrective action plan as follows:9/17/25 at 9:00 PM, CNA#1 noted that Resident #1 was not in the common area or in her room when CNA #1 returned from her lunch break. CNA #1 reported to MDS Nurse #1 that Resident#1 was not in the common area or in her room. MDS Nurse called Code W (elopement), and all staff began a search of the facility and perimeter.9/17 /25 at 9:05 PM, CNA#2 was searching in the front of the building where the conference room and business office are located and heard Resident #1 knocking on the front door. Resident#1 was brought in with no signs of distress, only stating she was lost. Resident#1 was clothed appropriately with her purse on her shoulder. The weather was clear skies and around 75 degrees.9/17/25 at 9:10 PM, Administrator was notified by MDS Nurse about the incident. The Administrator notified the Director of Nursing (DON) of incident.9/17/25 at 9:18 PM, MDS Nurse completed body audit with no signs or symptoms of injury.9/17125 at 9:30 PM, MDS Nurse completed a head count of all current residents in the facility, and all residents were accounted for.9/17 /25 at 9:40 PM, MDS Nurse notified Resident #1 's representative of the incident.9/17/25 at9:45 PM, Medical Director (MD) was notified of Resident#1's incident and no new orders were given.9/17/25 at 10:15 PM, the Administrator arrived at the facility and checked that all doors were functioning properly. The Administrator interviewed all employees and any residents that had interactions with Resident #1 prior to the incident.9/17/25 at 10:30 PM, Administrator began in-service for all employees on elopement policy and procedures. All staff would be in-serviced before returning to their next shift.9/17/25 at 10:46 PM, Administrator reported incident to State Agency.9/18/25 at 9:00 AM, an emergency Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meeting was held to discuss incident, actions taken, and further interventions.9/18/25 at 9:15 AM, Social Services Director spoke with Resident #1 and noted no psychosocial harm due to incident.9/18/25 at 10:30 AM, Maintenance Director conducted a quality check of all doors to make sure they were operating as expected and door alarms were added to all of the doors. 9/18/25 at 11:00 AM, Regional Director of Operations interviewed Resident#1 and Resident #2 for any details they remember about the incident.9/18/25 at 12:25 PM, during education of elopement policy and procedures with dietary staff, Dietary Aide #1 stated that Resident #1 had followed him out of the building on 9/17/25. Dietary Aide #1 clocked out at 8:27 PM and went to the front door to exit. Dietary Aide #1 did not know the new front door code and went to nurse's station to get code. When Dietary Aide #1 came back through the facility, the resident followed him to the front door and went out behind him after 8:30 PM. Dietary Aide #1 stated that he sat in the parking lot until 8:50 PM with eyes on Resident #1 trying to determine if Resident #1 was a visitor.9/18/25 at 2:00 PM, wander assessments were completed on all active residents in the facility by DON, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, and Medical Records LPN. One out of sixty-one residents was identified at risk for elopement.9/18/25 at 2:00 PM, Maintenance Director began elopement drills for all shifts and completed on 9/19/2025 at 5:30 AM.9/18/25 at 3:30 PM, a follow up QAPI committee meeting was held by Administrator to discuss that all interventions were in place. These interventions are as follows: Maintenance will conduct a quality check of all doors, an elopement drill on each shift within the next 24 hours and put alarms on each of the doors. Completed on 9/18/2025 at 2:00 PM: Administrative nurses completed wander assessments on all current residents, update care plans and wander books accordingly; completed a 100 percent audit of care plans; completed 100 percent audit of wander books located at both nurse's stations. Social services would interview Resident #1 for any psychosocial harm. Administrative staff would in-service all employees on elopement policy and procedures before their next shift. The root cause analysis determined by Administrator and DON found that the resident followed out a dietary employee while he was leaving at the end of his shift. It was determined through interviews with Dietary Aide #1 that he was unaware that Resident #1 was a resident, under the impression that she was a visitor. The QAPI committee meeting determined at this time to prevent further adverse events the interventions would include elopement drills on all shifts and one elopement drill per week for four weeks on alternating shifts and one per month for six months on alternating shifts. Person-centered in-services will be completed with all staff for any new residents identified as an elopement risk or any current residents who are newly identified as an elopement risk.9/22/25 at 4:40 PM, incident was reported to Attorney General's office by Administrator.Facility alleges that all corrective actions were complete on 9/18/2025 and Immediate Jeopardy removed on 9/19/2025.Validation:The SA validated through interview and record review view, that all corrective actions had been implemented as of 9/18/25, and the facility was in compliance as of 9/19/25, prior to the SA's entrance on 9/22/25.
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety during a bed bath, in which Resident #2 fell from the bed to the floor, sustainin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety during a bed bath, in which Resident #2 fell from the bed to the floor, sustaining fractures to her bilateral lower extremities for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for falls. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Accidents and Incidents, undated, revealed It is the policy of this facility that the resident environment remains as free of accidents and hazards as possible and those residents receive supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents whenever possible . A record review of the facility's investigation of Resident #2's fall with fractures revealed that on 12/21/24 at approximately 10:45 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)# 1 provided care and a bath to Resident #2 while turning her in the bed on her left side. CNA#1 attempted to reach to hold onto the resident, but due to her being slippery, she rolled out of bed. A record review of the Hospitalist Discharge Note, dated 12/22/24, indicated in the Hospital Course that Resident #2 was receiving a bath when she fell from the bed onto her knees, suffering bilateral femoral fractures . During a phone interview with CNA #1 on 1/22/25 at 3:30 PM, she confirmed that she was assisting Resident #2 with her bed bath. CNA #1 stated that Resident #2 helped during her bath because she could roll in the bed on each side, using the side rail. On that day, since she was slippery due to her bath, she could not catch her while turning. She accidentally fell to the floor on her knees while holding on to the siderail and I could not catch her before she slipped off the bed. CNA #1 immediately notified the nursing supervisor and called for assistance for Resident #2. During a phone interview with Registered Nurse #1 on 1/27/25 at 10:00 AM, she revealed on 12/21/24 that CNA #1 summoned her to Resident #2, finding the resident on the floor next to her bed. CNA #1 stated that when she gave her a bed bath, the resident was slippery and fell to the floor, and she could not catch her from falling. Resident #2 complained of bilateral knee pain and the nurse immediately phoned the local emergency medical response. Then she notified the medical provider, Resident Representative (RR), Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator. On 1/27/25 at 10:30 AM, during an interview with the DON, she confirmed that she was aware of the fall that occurred with Resident #2 on 12/21/24. The DON stated she immediately began an investigation, and all notifications were made. The DON confirmed that Resident #2 was able to assist with bed mobility for turning and repositioning in her bed for bed baths. The DON stated the fall was an accident due to Resident #2 being wet and slippery during the bed bath. On 1/27/25 at 10:45 AM, an interview with the Administrator confirmed that she was notified of the fall that occurred on 12/21/24 with Resident #2. She stated the facility investigated the allegation and ruled the fall as accidental. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 3/27/24 and she had diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/25/2024 revealed Resident #2 had no impairment to her upper extremities, was not dependent for showering and bathing self, and was able to roll left and right with partial/moderate assistance.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively addressed and prevented the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively addressed and prevented the recurrence of resident accidents. This failure resulted in a resident sustaining bilateral fractures, despite a prior citation for F689 on 10/3/24, which indicates the facility did not sustain systemic corrective actions to prevent the recurrence for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #2. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program dated 10/22, revealed, .The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents . A record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form 2567 (a record that identifies the federal regulation in violation and describes the findings of noncompliance and the facility's plan of correction), dated 10/3/24, revealed the facility was cited F689 (Accident Hazards) when two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) improperly positioned a resident in bed, resulting in a fall with an injury. A record review of the facility's investigation of Resident #2's fall with fractures revealed that on 12/21/24 at approximately 10:45 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)# 1 provided care and a bath to Resident #2 while turning her in the bed on her left side. CNA#1 attempted to reach to hold onto the resident, but due to her being slippery, she rolled out of bed. During an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 1/27/25 at 11:00 AM, she confirmed she reviewed the CMS-2567 from the survey on 10/3/24. She stated the facility continued to conduct audits to monitor compliance of residents having a safe environment and to prevent accidents as per the plan of correction. During an interview with the Administrator on 1/27/25 at 11:20 AM, the facility performed audits to monitor the residents for safety and accident prevention. She commented that she was going to take the concerns regarding accident/hazards back to the (QAPI) committee to again develop action plans and audits.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident when Certif...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident when Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 did not safely position Resident #1 in the bed allowing the resident to fall to the floor for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for falls. (Resident #1) Findings Include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Accidents and Incidents revealed: It is the policy of this facility that the resident environment remains as free of accidents and hazards as possible and that residents receive supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents whenever possible . A record review of the facility's investigation revealed on 9/19/24, around 8:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) notified the Administrator of an allegation of abuse between Resident #1 and CNA #1. Resident #1 alleged that CNA #1 pushed her out of bed during care. An investigation was initiated by the DON and the Administrator. CNA #1 was suspended pending investigation, and the incident was reported to the State Agency (SA) Attorney General's Office (AGO), and the local Police Department. The family and the medical director were also notified. The investigation concluded that the allegation of abuse was not substantiated, and the incident was ruled accidental. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 9:15 AM, Resident #1 stated that she was sleepy on 9/19/24 while CNA #1 and CNA #2 provided care and she was unaware that CNA #2 had left the room. She explained that CNA #1 was standing behind her and that CNA #1 pulled the draw sheet to turn her over and it felt like CNA #1 had pushed her out of bed and she fell face down onto the floor. Resident #1 explained that she was unable to grab the bed rails because she did not realize she was that close to the edge of the bed. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 9:30 AM, CNA #1 stated that she was providing care with the help of CNA #2 for Resident #1 on 9/19/24. They were going to transfer her to her wheelchair, but noticed her brief needed to be changed. CNA #2 left the room and CNA #1 stayed in the room with the resident. Resident #1 was positioned on her side and after CNA #2 left the room, the resident began to slide out of bed. CNA #1 stated she was unable to catch the resident, and she fell to the floor. CNA #1 said she went to the door to tell the nurse. During an interview on 10/01/24 at 10:00 AM, CNA #2 stated that on 9/19/24, CNA #1 had asked for her help with getting the resident up and that she needed a new brief. CNA #2 said she left the room and confirmed the resident was lying on her left side facing the wall. During an interview on 10/03/24 at 9:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 confirmed that on 9/19/24, she heard a loud thump and saw the resident on the floor after CNA #1 came out of the room. She notified the resident's nurse and prepared the resident for transfer to the emergency room. During an interview on 10/3/24 at 9:46 AM, with LPN #3 she confirmed she was the nurse that was responsible for taking care of Resident #1 on 9/19/24. LPN #3 explained that LPN #2 called for her to come out of the medication room and go to Resident #1's room because she had fallen. LPN #3 stated that when she entered the room CNA#1, was standing in the room in a daze. She asked CNA #1 where the resident was because there was no one in the bed and CNA #1 stated that the resident was on the floor. The nurse stated she observed Resident #1 on the other side of the bed lying on her right side between the bed and the wall. Resident #1 was lying face down on her right side. The nurse stated that the bed was elevated to the waist level and Resident #1 had an opened brief between her legs on the floor that was saturated in urine. LPN #3 said the resident's bed had a draw sheet and an incontinent pad that was saturated in urine. LPN#3 also explained she assessed Resident #1 because she was bleeding from her right elbow, had a bruise on her right side, a bruise on the right side of her head, and her right knee had begun to swell. Resident #1 told her that CNA #1 pushed her out of the bed, and she did not want her back in her room ever again. Resident #1 was then sent to the emergency room for an evaluation. During an interview on 10/03/24 at 11:30 AM, the DON confirmed that she was aware of the fall that occurred with Resident #1 on 9/19/24. The DON stated she immediately began an investigation and made notifications. The DON confirmed the CNA did not ensure Resident #1 was positioned safely in the bed and should have had two people with bed mobility. During an interview on 10/03/24 at 11:45 AM, the Administrator confirmed he had been notified of the fall that occurred on 9/19/24 with Resident #1. He stated the facility investigated the allegation and ruled the fall as accidental. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Paraplegia. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/24 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15), indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Section GG revealed Resident #1 required substantial assistance with rolling left to right while in bed.
Jul 2024 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner, as evidenced by not providing meals conse...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner, as evidenced by not providing meals consecutively to all residents who were seated at the same table for three (3) of 20 residents observed during a dining room observation. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy Resident Rights dated November 23, 2016, revealed . It is the policy of this facility to promote and protect the rights of residents residing in this facility. Procedure . 2. This facility will make every effort to assist the resident in exercising his/her rights and to assure that the resident is always treated with .dignity . 6. Policies governing resident rights are outlined in a separate chapter of this manual entitled Resident Rights . (a) Resident rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence . (1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident is a manner and in an environment that promotes .enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individually . On 7/15/24 at 12:00 PM, observed 20 residents sitting in the dining room waiting for lunch with three (3) staff members also in the dining room. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4, she explained the kitchen staff are having problems in the kitchen and residents are still waiting for lunch. Lunch is usually served around noon, but it is a little late today. At 12:10 PM on 07/15/24, the tray cart came out of the kitchen to be served. Observed two (2) LPNs and one (1) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in the dining room and they began passing out trays. Resident #10 was in the dining room sitting at the table on the first row facing the kitchen with another resident. The resident sitting with Resident #10 was served his tray at 12:18 PM, no tray was available for Resident #10, so staff requested his tray and continued to pass out the trays to other residents at other tables. At 12:20 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview with LPN #4, she explained all residents are to be served at the same time at the same table, she asked kitchen staff for Resident #10's tray again and other residents' trays also. At 12:25 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview with Resident #10, he explained he had been in the dining room since 11:30 AM and he always eats lunch in the dining room. He feels everyone at a table should be served at the same time and he was here way before the other resident at his table. At 12:26 PM on 07/15/24, Resident #10 still had not gotten his lunch tray and the other resident at his table was through eating and left the dining room. At 12:27 PM on 07/15/24, three (3) lunch trays remained on the cart. LPN #4 explained those trays were not being passed out because those trays are for resident's sitting at the table with resident's whose trays are not on the cart. LPN #4 requested residents' trays from the kitchen staff again. Resident #10 received his lunch tray at this time. At 12:30 PM on 07/15/24, Resident #27 complained that she had not received her lunch tray and her tablemate had been served her tray. LPN #4 explained to the resident, she had asked the kitchen staff for her tray. At 12:33 PM on 07/15/24, Resident #27 received her tray. Staff explained to the resident that her lunch tray had been put on the hall cart. At 12:35 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview with Resident #27, she explained she always eats in the dining room and has been in the dining room since 11:30 AM. She understands the residents that need to be fed should get their food first, but she would like to get her food when her tablemate gets hers. At 12:36 PM 07/15/24, two (2) residents still did not have their trays. At 12:41 PM on 07/15/24, Resident #160 asked the staff where her tray was. LPN #4 explained to her she has requested her tray from the kitchen staff already and is waiting on her tray. Resident #160 complained she is going to miss her smoke break because she has not eaten her lunch yet. At 12:45 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview with Resident #160, she reported she has been in the dining room since 11:30 AM and she always eats in the dining room with her roommate. Her roommate was served her tray at this time, due to staff being afraid the food would be cold due to no cover on the plate. LPN #4 asked for Resident #160's lunch tray four (4) more times before the tray was delivered to the resident at 12:53 PM. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 at 12:55 PM on 07/15/24, she explained she had to ask several times for residents' trays and confirmed not all residents were served at the same time and that is a dignity concern for the residents. At 1:00 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview with LPN #5, she confirmed the three (3) residents who were not served at the same time as their tablemate, each resident eats in the dining room daily. The kitchen staff was informed before the trays came out of all the residents in the dining room. She is not sure how the trays for lunch are delivered to the dining room or floor or which one is served first. On 07/15/24 at 1:30 PM, during an interview with the Dietary Manager, she explained the dining room is served first, then TCU (Transition Care Unit) 1, then [NAME] 1, then TCU 2, and then [NAME] 2. She explained the nursing staff working in the dining room will notify kitchen staff the residents to be served in the dining room. Sometimes some residents will come in after the names are given and then their trays may be a little later than the others. She expects all residents to be served at the same time and be respected in a dignified manner. On 07/17/24 at 2:10 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator, they both verbalized all residents are to be served at the same time in the dining room before moving on to the next table. Not serving residents at the same table is a dignity issue. They both expect all residents' rights to be respected and each resident to be treated in a dignified manner. Resident #10 A record review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/03/24, with the diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side. A record review of Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/04/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #27 A record review of Resident #27's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/04/24 with the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified. A record review of Resident #27's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 05/08/24 revealed a BIMS Summary Score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #160 A record review of Resident #160's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 11/06/23, with the diagnosis of Paraplegia, Unspecified. A record review of Resident #160's Annual MDS, with an ARD of 05/08/24 revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status revealed there were no issues with the resident's short and long-term memory and was coded for modified independence indicating some difficulty in new situations only.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and the facility's policy, the facility failed to honor residents' request for an alternative menu as listed on the alternative me...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and the facility's policy, the facility failed to honor residents' request for an alternative menu as listed on the alternative menu for two (2) of two (2) residents sampled for choices. Resident #18 and #53 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Resident Rights dated November 23, 2016, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility to promote and protect the rights of residents residing in this facility. Procedure . 2. This facility will make every effort to assist the resident in exercising his/her rights and to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity . 6. Policies governing resident rights are outlined in a separate chapter of this manual entitled Resident Rights . (a) Resident rights. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination . (1) A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality . when preparing foods and meals, a facility must take into consideration residents' needs and preferences . A review of the facility's policy Menu Alternatives dated 07/09/2018 revealed, . An alternative meat or entrée and vegetable should be provided at every meal in the event of personal food preferences or refusals .Procedure: 1. Always available entrees, sandwiches, soups, salads, and desserts planned by the resident help increase resident satisfaction . On 07/15/24 at 12:00 PM, during an observation of a bulletin board just as you enter the dining room revealed a posting of the facility's Alternative Meals typed document which indicated If for any reason you do not like what is on the main menu, you may choose an item from the alternate list below: . Hamburger and French fries . Also observed posted was a document titled Alternative Weekly Menu which revealed, We are dedicated to ensuring that we give great customer service to all of our patrons. To ensure this we ask that all special requests be made in the department 2 to 4 hours prior to the start of the meal service . Resident #53 On 07/14/24 at 11:27 AM, during an interview with Resident #53, he explained that he had complained about the facility not honoring the alternative menu choices for months. He had asked for an alternative hamburger and fries, but the staff reported it is not allowed due to the last time it was offered all the residents ate mostly hamburgers and fries and would not eat the meal on the menu. He reported he was planning to start a petition this week for the residents' wanting hamburgers and fries as an alternative meal, as listed on the bulletin board. Residents were going to sign the form and he was going to present it to the management. He stated knew that he must follow the proper procedures to solve the problem. On 07/15/24 at 1:30 PM, during an interview with Resident #53, he explained the alternative menu posted in the dining room has hamburgers and fries as an option. The resident explained the that the menu has been up on the bulletin board in the dining room since he has been admitted in January. He explained that today he asked for an alternative and got soup and a sandwich. On 07/15/24 at 2:30 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6, she explained Resident #53 had complained about the food since being admitted . He does ask for an alternative meal almost daily. LPN #6 was not sure about hamburgers and fries. At 9:30 AM on 07/16/24, during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), she explained she had been aware residents were not happy about the menu and tries to meet with the resident council frequently regarding any concerns and goes over the menus. She explained the previous Administrator made the decision to no longer offer hamburgers and fries as the alternative menu, due to the residents asking for a lot of hamburgers. The DM explained that the removal of the hamburgers and fries from the alternative menu was related to budget concerns. The previous Administrator had decided to offer hamburger and fries on the weekly menu once a week instead and offer an entrée that consists of hamburger such as sloppy joes once a week. She confirmed the old alternative menu was never taken down and it was never explained to the residents in the Resident Council about hamburgers not being offered as an alternative meal. On 07/16/24 at 10:45 AM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #5, she explained Resident #53 does complain about the food including the menu and the alternative choices. Resident #53 does not like the menu most days and always asks for an alternative. He has asked for hamburgers and fries many times but has been told by the kitchen staff he cannot get hamburgers. CNA #5 explained other residents ask for hamburgers and been told no they cannot have one. She explained the facility used to make hamburgers and fries for the alternative meal but was not sure the reason why they stopped. She and other staff members have had a hard time getting kitchen staff to cooperate with alternative meals. At 3:34 PM on 07/16/24, during an interview with CNA #6, she explained Resident #53 does ask for alternative meals regularly. She explained the kitchen used to offer burgers and fries as an alternative meal, but the residents have not been able to get them. Instead, the residents can get soup and sandwiches. A record review of Resident #53's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/24/24, with the diagnosis of Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee. A record review of Resident #53's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 07/17/24 revealed orders for Regular diet, Regular texture, and Regular consistency. A record review of Resident #53's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/18/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #18 On 07/15/24 at 11:10 AM, during an interview with Resident #18, he reported he would like to get hamburgers again like he used to get if he didn't like the menu. He explained the facility used to let him order hamburgers and fries if he didn't like the menu, but the kitchen stopped fixing hamburgers and fries. He reported he does not always like the menu and asks for something else. Resident #18 was oriented to self and place. On 07/16/24 at 11:10 AM, Resident #18 reported he was told by the kitchen today that he could not get hamburgers and fries for lunch. At 11:15 AM on 07/16/24, during an interview with the facility's Cook, she confirmed she told Resident #18 he could not get hamburgers and fries for lunch today and that the DM would have to be addressed on the issue. A record review of Resident #18's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/24/23 with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity Without Behavioral Disturbance. A record review of Resident #18's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 07/17/24, revealed orders for Renal diet, Regular texture, and Regular consistency. A record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #18, with ARD of 04/10/24 revealed a BIMS score of 06, which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. On 07/17/24 at 8:30 AM, during an interview with the DM, she confirmed she was informed of the incident with Resident #18 on 07/16/24, regarding hamburgers and fries. The DM stated that she had spoken to the dietary staff and that any resident can get hamburgers and fries when requested. On 07/17/24 at 10:50 AM, during a phone interview with the facility's Registered Dietitian, she explained she was not aware residents were complaining about the menus. On 07/17/24 at 02:10 PM, during an interview with the new Administrator, she explained she has only been at the facility for three weeks and was not aware the previous Administrator had taken away hamburgers and fries as an alternative food item and had not informed the residents of the change. She stated that she expects the kitchen staff to honor residents' choices and that the alternative menu be followed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an unattended medication cart was secured and locked for one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed. Fin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an unattended medication cart was secured and locked for one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed. Findings include: A review of the facility's Hazardous Areas Devices and Equipment, reviewed 8/2023 revealed, All hazardous areas, devices, and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible . Identification of Hazards 1. A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness. Examples of environmental hazards include, but are not limited to the following: a. Equipment and devices that are left unattended or are malfunctioning . A review of the facility's Storage of Medications, dated 9/5/12 revealed, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturers' recommendations are those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Procedures . B. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications are allowed access to medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access . L. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal . and reordered from the pharmacy . if a current order exists . During an observation of the medication cart on the 200 Hall on 7/14/24 at 9:00 AM, revealed an unlocked and unattended medication cart. There was an unopened 21 gauge x (by) 1 inch gauge needle lying on the top of the medication cart. Both drawers had more than twenty (20) unsecured pills lying in the bottom of the drawer. The unlocked drawers allowed access to anyone. On 7/14/24 at 9:02 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed down the hallway administering medications to residents and was out of the view of the unlocked and unsecured medication cart. On 7/14/24 at 9:30 AM, in an observation and interview, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1 pushed the unsecured medication cart into a shower room. CNA #1 revealed she pushed the cart into the shower room to help the nurse because she knew the medication cart should not be left unattended in the hallway. CNA #1 said she did not notice the needle on the top of the medication cart, nor was she aware the drawers of the cart contained various pills. On 7/14/24 at 9:45 AM, during an interview, LPN #1 confirmed the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended in the hallway by the nurse's station. LPN #1 said the medication cart had been stationed on the hall since Wednesday of this week because the locking mechanism had broken. The medications were switched over to another medication cart while she was off from work and when she returned to work on Friday, she had noticed the cart had been changed out. LPN #1 explained the cart had been sitting in the hallway since Friday. She stated she had not noticed a needle on top of the cart, and she was not aware there were loose pills in the drawers of the cart. LPN#1 stated a confused resident could have hurt themselves if they had gotten the needle or taken some of the pills in the drawers. She stated whoever changed out the medication cart should have removed all the medications and stored the cart properly. During an interview on 7/14/24 at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the medication cart was changed out by the night shift because the cart was broken and would not lock. The DON said the night shift should have removed the needle and the medications out of the cart. The DON explained she had not noticed the cart on the hallway, and she expected the nurses to make sure medication carts are locked in the medication room when they are not being used. The DON confirmed a confused resident could have harmed themselves with the needle and taken the medication that was in the bottom of the drawers. During an interview on 7/14/24 at 12:34 PM, the Administrator explained she expected the nurses to keep medications and supplies in a secure medication room when the nurse was not using them. The Administrator said the medications should have been destroyed and the broken medication cart should have been taken out of the facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a grievance of cold food by Resident Council members was resolved four (4) of six (6) months of Resident Co...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a grievance of cold food by Resident Council members was resolved four (4) of six (6) months of Resident Council meetings reviewed. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy Grievances and/or Concerns dated November 23, 2016, revealed, .After receiving a .grievance the facility will actively seek a resolution and keep the resident appropriately apprised of its progress toward resolution. As necessary the facility will take action to prevent further occurrence during the investigation . A review of six (6) months of Resident Council Minutes revealed the residents have documented grievances of cold food for (4) of (6) months (01/31/24, 03/22/24. 04/29/24, and 05/24/24). On 07/14/24 at 1:30 PM, during a Resident Council Meeting, while reviewing previous concerns voiced by the Council regarding cold food, Residents #49, #5, #3, #39, #44, and #36 reported the food continued to be cold. On 07/16/24 at 3:00 PM, an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) acknowledged receiving notice of the Resident Council report when she attended the meetings or from the Activities Director. The DM also acknowledged the Resident Council reports of cold food. The DM stated in January she had a meeting with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the speed of tray delivery to the rooms. The DM stated the DON had additional staff go to the floor to assist with trays. The DM stated this resolved the issue. The DM reported that about three (3) months ago she noticed one burner on the steam table was malfunctioning. The DM stated she made a report to the Maintenance Department on 03/18/24. The DM stated she also informed the past Administrator of the problems with the steamer. The DM confirmed when the current Administrator arrived at the facility she informed her at the June Quality Assurance (QA) meeting. The DM reported during the maintenance inspection, it was realized that a second burner was out. The DM stated the Maintenance Director ordered a part to fix the steam table, but the part was not able to be used due to the steam table wires being burned out. The DM reported there has not been any follow-up from the Maintenance Department. On 07/16/24 at 3:15 PM, in an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), he acknowledged the DM reported the malfunctioning steam table to his department on 03/18/24 by way of a Maintenance Request Form. The MD stated he informed the previous Administrator of the malfunctioning steam table within a day or two of receiving the work order. The MD reported the Administrator ordered an element for the steam table to be repaired. The MD stated when the element arrived, he attempted the repair, but the steam table component was dry rotted. The MD stated by the time the part came in and he tried to fix the steam table, the Administrator was no longer working for the facility. The MD reported he would try to have a technician come to fix the steam table. The MD acknowledged that he did not have an established appointment for a technician to come to the facility to fix the steam table because he just called the technician yesterday and has not heard back from them. The MD confirmed he has not made any earlier attempts to contact a technician. On 07/16/24 at 3:30 PM, an interview with the DON she acknowledged the meeting with the DM in January to have Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) more active with passing out trays. The DON confirmed this intervention was effective. On 07/17/24 at 9:41 AM, an interview with the Administrator revealed she was never made aware of the malfunctioning steam table. The Administrator reported finding out the steam table did not fully work on Monday 07/14/24 from the Regional Director of Operations, as she was not present at the facility. The Administrator stated she received records of the Resident Council meeting minutes from the Activities Director as soon as they are finished. The Administrator revealed a service technician was scheduled to come to the facility this week.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, test tray evaluation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food was at an appetizing temperature for one (1) of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, test tray evaluation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food was at an appetizing temperature for one (1) of 16 sampled residents. (Resident #53). This has the potential to affect all residents receiving meals prepared by the facility's dietary department. Findings include: This tag is cross-referenced to tag F565: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a grievance of cold food by Resident Council members was resolved four (4) of six (6) months of Resident Council meetings reviewed. A review of the facility's policy titled Food Temperatures, dated 03/19/20 revealed, Food should be served at the proper temperature to ensure food safety and palatability. Procedure: . 8. Palatability of foods determines appropriate temperatures at bedside or tableside food. Generally, hot food is palatable between 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) . On 07/14/24 at 11:24 AM, during an interview, Resident #53 complained the food had been served cold at times. On 07/14/24 at 11:25 AM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #7, she explained she had been at the facility since April 2024, and residents had complained about the food being cold. On 07/14/24 at 11:45 AM, during an interview with Dietary Department Cook/Staff #4, she revealed two (2) of the four (4) compartments on the steam table did not work. The cook reported she poured boiling water into one of the inoperable compartments to use it. The cook revealed the Maintenance Department had been informed that the steam table could not be repaired. The cook stated she was informed that the steam table would have to be replaced. On 07/15/24 at 11:35 AM, during an observation of the kitchen staff as they prepared trays, the staff were not covering plates as they prepared them. There were up to six (6) racks of trays on a cart with no lids on the plates. At 11:39 AM on 07/15/24, during an observation of the steam table food temperatures, the scalloped corn was 170 degrees, garlic pepper pork loin was 160 degrees, and zucchini, tomatoes, and mushrooms were 170 degrees. At 12:05 PM on 07/15/24, the first tray cart left the kitchen to go to the dining room. None of the dining room trays had a plate cover. At 1:14 PM on 07/15/24, the last open tray cart containing four (4) trays left the kitchen to go to the hall. On 07/15/24 at 1:18 PM, the test tray reached the State Agency (SA) in the conference room. The food temperatures revealed garlic pepper pork loin with gravy at 110 degrees, zucchini and tomatoes at 100 degrees, and corn at 110 degrees. The food was lukewarm to taste. The Dietary Manager confirmed the food was lukewarm and not at an appetizing temperature. At 2:05 PM on 07/15/24, during an interview, CNA #5 explained Resident #53 and other residents had complained about the food being cold for several months. On 07/17/24 at 10:50 AM, during a phone interview with the facility's Registered Dietitian, she explained she was not aware residents were complaining about the cold food. On 07/17/24 at 2:15 PM, during an interview, the Administrator explained she was made aware recently that the residents had been complaining about cold food and that the steam table was not working properly. She expected all food to be delivered to the residents at an appetizing temperature. A record review of the admission Record of Resident #53 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/24/24, with diagnoses that included Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee and Essential Hypertension. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #53, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/18/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (MDS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure spoiled food items were discarded, food items such as seasonings and spices were not open and exposed,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure spoiled food items were discarded, food items such as seasonings and spices were not open and exposed, and the food prep area was free from contamination for two (2) of two (2) kitchen observations. This has the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's dietary department. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy Food Storage, revised 07/11/2024, revealed, Fresh vegetables should be checked and sorted for ripeness .should be inspected for decay .dry products should be kept in tightly sealed containers . A review of the facility's policy Infection Prevention and Control, dated 10/6/2017, revealed, The goals of the infection prevention and control program are to: A. Decrease the risk of infection to residents and personnel .C. Identify and correct problems relating to infection prevention and control practices .D. Maintain compliance with state and federal regulations related to infection and prevention . On 07/14/24 at 9:07 AM, during an interview and observation of the kitchen with the Cook, there were three (3) green bell peppers that had soft, pliable spots and areas of white biological growth. There were 15 containers of seasonings that were not closed, and the seasonings were exposed. The [NAME] acknowledged the overly ripe bell peppers and the exposed seasonings. The [NAME] reported she was unaware the produce was over-ripe and reported she and the Dietary Manager (DM) were responsible for maintaining food quality in the kitchen. On 07/15/24 at 11:14 AM, during an observation, the [NAME] picked up a glove from the floor and placed it on a food prep table where pureed tomatoes and sandwiches were being prepared. On 07/15/24 at 11:16 AM, in an interview with the Cook, she acknowledged that she had picked up a glove off the floor and placed it on the food prep table. The cook stated she knew food was being prepared on the table, but she did not want to place the glove back into the container with clean gloves. She confirmed the floor was considered dirty and the glove should have been discarded appropriately. On 07/15/24 at 1:24 PM, an interview with the DM revealed she was aware of the issues regarding spoiled peppers, exposed seasonings, and the [NAME] placing a glove on the food prep table from the floor. The DM stated it was the responsibility of the cook and herself to make sure spoiled foods were discarded. The DM reported whoever opened an item should make sure it was not left open, with the contents exposed. The DM stated she expected spoiled foods to be discarded and the seasonings to be closed. She also stated she expected items that were picked up off of the floor are discarded appropriately. On 07/17/24 at 9:24 AM, an interview with the Administrator stated the issues in the kitchen should not have occurred. It was her expectation that items be stored and discarded appropriately.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interviews and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (Casper) reporting data review, the provider failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) (information on the sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (Casper) reporting data review, the provider failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) (information on the staffing hours for the appropriate care of the residents) had been corrected before submitting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the second Quarter of the 2024 Fiscal Year (January 1, 2024 - March 31, 2024) for one (1) of four (4) quarters. Findings include: A review of the provider's [NAME] reporting data revealed the facility triggered excessively low weekend staffing and one star staffing rating for the second quarter of the 2024 fiscal year. A review of the facility's policy titled, Staffing Policy, reviewed 10/2022 revealed, . 4. Direct care staffing information per day (including agency and contract staff) is submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payroll-based journal system on the schedule specified by CMS but no less than once a quarter . During an interview on 7/17/24 at 9:00 AM, the Senior Director of Operations (SDO) explained she was responsible for sending staffing numbers to CMS. The SDO also said the staffing punches were pulled from Paylocity (online payroll software) and sent to CMS. The SDO also explained she notified the Administrator that the facility triggered for low weekend staffing. The SDO said she asked if there was anyone that was coded wrong which would cause the discrepancy. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 10:00 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) explained the facility failed to accurately code several employees when submitting the PBJ. The BOM said she attended a mini boot camp with the company on May 25, 2024. During this boot camp, it was brought to her attention that several employees who work for their facility do multiple jobs that have several different codes. If those individuals work the floor on weekends, those codes must be put in manually or the system would go back to their primary code. This would make the PBJ look like the staff did not work on those weekend days. The BOM stated when she came back to the facility, she did an audit and noted several days this occurred in the second quarter. The days this occurred were 2/17/24, 2/18/24, 3/9/24, 3/10/24, 3/30/24, and 3/31/24. A record review of the facility's Weekly Summary of Hours Report revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 worked 2/17/24, 3/9/24, and 3/10/24. The RN's primary position is Transitional Care Unit (TCU) Manager, which did not show that she was coded as a floor nurse for those days. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 worked as a CNA on 3/2/24. Her primary position is Transportation Aide. CNA #3 worked as a CNA on 3/2/24. The CNA's primary position is Transportation Aide. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 worked on 2/17/24, 2/18/24, and 3/10/24. This nurse's primary position is Medical Records. CNA #4 worked on 2/17/24, 2/18/24, 3/10/24, 3/30/24, and 3/31/24. The CNA's primary position is Dietary Aide. The Director of Nursing (DON) worked on 3/31/24. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 10:30 AM, the DON explained she was notified on 6/3/24 the facility triggered low staffing in the second quarter because of the inaccurate codes. The DON said she was told that the BOM as well as the DON would have to manually code staff that work weekends that do not normally provide direct care. During an interview on 7/17/24 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed the facility triggered for low weekend staffing and is a one-star facility. The Administrator stated she had only been the Administrator for three (3) weeks at this facility. The Administrator said she was informed that the facility had a problem with the right code being submitted to CMS if the staff works multiple positions. She was told the DON and BOM would manually place the correct codes in the system. The Administrator said she thinks this will fix the problem.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error by applying a transdermal medication patch without removing the previously...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error by applying a transdermal medication patch without removing the previously applied medication patch from the resident for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Resident #1 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Medications, Transdermal Drug Delivery System (Patch) Application, revised 8/25/14, revealed .To administer medication through the skin for continuous absorption while the patch is in place, through proper placement of the patch and care of the application sites .Procedure .Remove old patch from body . A record review of the Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine History and Physical, dated 1/12/2024 revealed Resident #1 had two fentanyl (Duragesic) patches on when he arrived at the Emergency Department (ED). On 3/14/24 at 10:35 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON), it was revealed that Resident #1 had 2 (two) Duragesic Patches before he was sent to the emergency department on 1/11/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 reported she had searched for the old patch on the resident and in the linen on 1/10/24 and she was unable to find it. She went ahead and applied the new pain patch on Resident #1. On 3/15/24 at 10:10 AM, during an interview with LPN #1, confirmed on 1/10/24 at approximately 8:10 AM, she did not feel or see the previous Duragesic patch on the resident. She felt as if it had been removed by the previous shift, which is why she applied the new Duragesic Patch. A record review of the Order Summary Report, with Active Orders As Of: 1/12/2024 revealed Resident #1 had a Physician's Order, dated, 10/21/23, for Duragesic-25 Patch (A type of transdermal pain patch) 72 hours 25 mcg/hr (micrograms/hour) (fentanyl) apply 1 patch transdermally every 72 hours and remove per schedule. A record review of the Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed there was no documentation indicating the Duragesic-25 Patch was removed 1/10/24 at 05:59 AM. There was documentation that a Duragesic -25 Patch was applied at on 1/10/24 at 8:15 AM by LPN #1. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/31/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and Cerebral Infarction.
Sept 2023 8 deficiencies 8 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews the facility failed to notify Resident #1's primary physician following immediately of a change in status following an incident that requ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews the facility failed to notify Resident #1's primary physician following immediately of a change in status following an incident that required the resident to be transferred to the hospital for evaluation for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1. Resident #1 was left alone and unattended on the facility transport van for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration, and care and assessments. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van after being abandoned on the facility's transport van after returning to the facility from a dialysis appointment on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:45 PM. The facility failed to notify the primary physician for Resident #1 immediately when staff located the resident and determined that she had been left unattended in the facility van for over sixteen (16) hours following her return to the facility after her hemodialysis treatment. Resident #1 was abandoned and restrained in her wheelchair by seat belts in the facility transport van and did not receive supervision or monitoring from the facility from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 7:45 AM on 9/16/23. The facility's failure to notify the primary physician immediately placed this resident, and other residents, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The State Agency determined the situation to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 9/15/23 when Resident #1 was abandoned on the facility transport van for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes following hemodialysis. The resident received no treatment, supervision, monitoring or care during this time. The IJ existed at: 42 CFR 483.10(g)(14)(i)(B)(D) Notification of Changes; Scope and Severity J - F580 The State Agency (SA) notified the facility Administrator of the IJ on 9/26/23 at 1:15 PM and provided the IJ Template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for F580; 42 CFR 483.10(g)(14)(i)(B)(D) Notification of Changes was lowered from a J to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status .reviewed 08/2023 revealed that it was the facility's policy that the resident's attending physician be notified promptly of changes in the resident's status, specifically when there has been an incident involving the resident or need to transfer the resident to a hospital. Record review of the Facility Investigation revealed the Transportation Aide (TA) transported Resident #1 back to the facility following her dialysis treatment at an outside dialysis facility at about 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 and the resident remained strapped in her wheelchair in the facility van in the facility parking lot until about 7:45 AM on 9/16/23 without supervision, monitoring, or care and without the knowledge of facility staff. According to the Facility Investigation on 9/16/23 facility staff began to attempt to locate Resident #1 at 7:00 AM, the resident was located on the van at 7:45 AM. The resident was removed from the van at 7:50 AM and the staff provided a bed bath and breakfast, and the Director of Nurses (DON) was notified. The DON notified Resident #1's primary physician at or about 8:40 AM, fifty (50) minutes after the resident was located on the van, one (1) hour and forty (40) minutes after the staff began to attempt to locate the resident and approximately sixteen (16) hours after the resident was left alone, without supervision in the facility van. On 9/21/23 at 2:28 PM, an interview with CNA #2 revealed that she had worked on 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 and was assigned to the unit on the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM (7A-7P shift). She assisted Registered Nurse (RN)#1 and other staff locating Resident #1 and removing her from the van. We observed Resident #1 seated in her wheelchair on the van, sweaty with throw-up and drool on her mouth and clothes and that her skin was hot, hot. Then we were instructed by RN #1 to bring her to her room, give her a bath, and assist with a meal. On 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, an interview with the facility Medical Director/Primary Physician (MD) for Resident #1 stated that Resident's missed medications and care were a concern. He stated that as soon as he was notified, he issued an order for Resident #1 to be transferred via ambulance to the hospital emergency department (ED) for assessment and lab tests to protect the resident. He confirmed that there was a period of at least fifty minutes between the resident's removal from the van and his notification and that he would not characterize his notification as immediate or prompt. He stated that if he had been notified sooner, he would have, and did, order assessment and treatment as needed at the Emergency Department (ED). The DON stated during an interview on 9/26/23 at 1:35 PM, that RN #1 notified her by telephone at home on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM that nursing staff had located Resident #1 on the facility van after she arrived back at the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:30 PM the previous afternoon. The DON confirmed that she reported to the facility at or about 8:40 AM and assessed Resident #1 and notified the MD. The DON stated that she was aware that the regulations and the facility policy required the resident's primary physician to be notified immediately upon change of condition or status and said that postponement of fifty (50) minutes did not qualify as immediate or prompt. The DON described monitoring of the dialysis access site as very important for the safety of the resident. The DON stated that the results of the resident having sat up and strapped in her wheelchair in the van for over sixteen (16) hours could have resulted in negative results including serious negative cardiac results and that the resident could have lost a lot of blood due to lack of monitoring of the dialysis access site following dialysis treatment. The DON confirmed that the resident was supposed to receive care and monitoring in accordance with current standards of practice and the resident's care plan. Physician care instructions that were missed or omitted for the sixteen (16) hours the resident spent in the facility van unsupervised without the knowledge of the facility staff. Record review of the local hospital ED notes dated 9/16/23 revealed that Resident #1 was assessed and treated by ED Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) on 9/16/23 for Heat Exposure .Rhabdomyolysis .Adult Neglect or Abandonment .Elevated Blood Pressure Reading. On 9/27/23 at 4:15 PM, an interview with the EDNP revealed that she considered Resident to #1 to be a risk for several potential negative cardiac results of having sat up in a wheelchair without care or repositioning for over sixteen (16) hours which included Rhabdomyolysis, Heat Exposure and Elevated Blood Pressure. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Diabetes, Hypertensive Urgency, Long Term (current) use of Insulin. The facility provided the following removal plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1, as evidenced by on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:45 PM, after returning to the facility from a dialysis appointment the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility's transport van. Resident #1 was left alone and unattended on the facility transport van for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van. This resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration, and care and assessments, and expressing that she was anxious, hurting, and afraid and, I thought I was doomed. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 9/15/23 when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility transport van. The facility's neglect to provide ordered care and services placed Resident #1 and other residents who use the facility transport van for transfers in a situation that could likely lead to serious injury, impairment or death. The IJ and SQC existed at: 42 CFR 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation - F600, Scope and Severity J. The SA notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and SQC on 9/26/23 and provided the Administrator with the IJ template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ and SQC were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ and SQC was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity of 42 CFR 483.12-F600- Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation was lowered from a Scope and Severity of J to a D while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, update 10/2022, revealed, Policy Statement: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . Policy Interpretation and Implementation .1. Protect residents from .neglect by anyone including .a. facility staff . Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertensive, Insulin-Dependent, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic kidney disease. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 indicating Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Section G revealed for resident transfer, that the resident was an extensive assist with two people. Section H revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section J revealed Resident #1 experienced pain frequently. Section M revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. A record review of the facility-reported investigation, dated 9/19/2023, revealed, Incident: During shift report on 9/16/2023 at approximately 7:00 am (AM), the night shift informed the oncoming shift that the resident did not return from dialysis on 9/15/2023. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van. On 9/20/23 at 9:30 AM, the State Agency (SA) observed Resident #1 sitting hunched over in the wheelchair with poor posture. The shunt/graft was covered by clothing. Resident was unable to stand. The SA observed a lift sling beneath the resident. The resident was soft-spoken and became short of breath during a conversation. During the interview, Resident #1 stated she was in bad shape. The Resident stated that she is always hungry, thirsty, and in pain. On 9/20/23 at 9:48 AM, an interview with Resident #1's daughter revealed her mother was left in her wheelchair overnight in the facility van because the Transportation Aide (TA) forgot to remove her. Resident #1's daughter also stated she was aware that her mother did not receive her nighttime medications, dinner, or any type of care for bedtime. During the interview, Resident #1's daughter confirmed the facility did not realize her mother was missing until the next day. Resident #1's daughter stated her mother always complains of being hungry, thirsty, and hurting. A record review of the Transportation Aide (TA)'s written statement revealed, on 9/16/23, .Arrived at (Proper Name of Facility) I noticed a elderly women falling so I jumped out of van to assist her the lady told me she was too weak then then pulled off. I went back inside (Proper Name of Facility) to finish up normal routine and left for the day. Around 7:15 AM I got a call asking about Resident #1 and I asked the nurse to check the bus .I would like to add that I arrived at (Proper Name of Facility) at or about 3:30 PM with Resident #1 . On 9/20/23 at 4:05 PM, an interview with the TA revealed on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM, she arrived from dialysis back to the facility with Resident #1 secured in the transport van. She parked and noticed a visitor who was in distress in the parking lot. She stated that she immediately jumped out of the parked van, closed the door, and assisted the visitor. Following the incident with the visitor, she stated that she clocked out and left the facility. The following day, 9/16/23, at approximately 7:20 AM, she received a phone call from the facility questioning where Resident #1 was. She realized that she had not removed Resident #1 from the van, and the resident remained unattended for approximately 16 hours. On 9/20/23 at 3:40 PM, an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #3 revealed that she worked on 9/15/23 until 7:00 PM. She was assigned to Resident #1. CNA #3 stated that Resident #1 usually returned to the facility around 4:30 PM. CNA #3 stated she informed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, who was coming on 9/15/23 at 7:00 PM, that the resident wasn't back yet. A record review of the License Practical Nurse (LPN) #1's written statement revealed, . 9/15/23 I received report that patient had not returned from dialysis. After completed pm (PM) med (medication) pass resident had still not returned. At around 10 or so I tried to call (Professional Name Dialysis) with no answer. Reported told day nurse that she had not returned from dialysis . On 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, an interview with LPN #1 revealed that she worked 9/15/23 from 7:00 PM until 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM. She said that at approximately 10:00 PM, she had one resident who had not received their medications, Resident #1. She stated, I realized (Resident #1) was the only resident that did not receive her hours' sleep medications. She stated, I called (the) dialysis unit and got no answer on 9/15/23 at 10:00 PM. LPN #1 revealed she received an admission on [DATE] at 10:00 PM and performed no further searches for Resident #1. The LPN confirmed on 9/16/23, she informed the day shift nurse and Registered Nurse (RN) #1 of the missing resident. LPN #1 confirmed that on 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 in the AM, Resident #1's shunt/ access site dressing was not observed for bleeding following dialysis. She also stated she did not give her medications, accucheck, or insulin. On 9/22/23 at 4:42 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed that he was made aware on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:50 AM of the incident in which Resident #1 was last observed by facility staff strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM and was located by facility staff strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. The Administrator confirmed that Resident #1 was left on the facility van following her dialysis treatment and did not receive any medications, food or fluids, care or services, or monitoring for sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 2:28 PM, an interview with CNA #2 revealed that she had worked on 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 and was assigned to the unit on the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM (7A-7P shift). She assisted RN #1 and other staff finding Resident #1 and removing her from the van. We observed Resident #1 seated in her wheelchair on the van, sweaty with throw-up and drool on her mouth and clothes and that her skin was hot, hot. Then we were instructed by RN #1 to bring her to her room, give her a bath, and assist with a meal. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, with the Medical Director (MD) revealed that there was potential for serious complications for Resident #1, , especially with her comorbidities. On 9/26/23 at 1:35 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM, the TA left Resident #1 in the facility van and was found on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. The DON stated that the resident not receiving medications, supervision, or monitoring for over sixteen (16) hours could have resulted in serious injury or impairment. She stated that the failure of the facility to ensure the resident received the morning dose of insulin and monitoring of the blood glucose for Resident #1 on the morning of 9/16/23 could have resulted in the resident experiencing signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. She said that failure to ensure the administration of respiratory medications on the evening of 9/15/23 for Resident #1 could have resulted in signs and symptoms of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which could have hurt the resident's breathing or exacerbated the resident's disease process. The DON stated that the failure of the facility to provide the scheduled dose of blood pressure medication on the evening of 9/15/23 could have resulted in serious negative cardiac results. During the interview with the DON, she stated that the facility's failure to provide adequate and appropriate monitoring for Resident #1 from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 until 7:45 AM on 9/16/23 could have resulted in the serious injury or impairment of Resident #1. The DON confirmed that failure to monitor the resident dialysis graph/shunt site could have resulted in bleeding at the site, which could have resulted in the resident losing blood or hemorrhaging. She stated that monitoring the site following a dialysis appointment was very important for the resident's safety. The DON stated that failure to appropriately monitor Resident #1 for signs/symptoms of hyperglycemia (high blood glucose levels) for over sixteen (16) hours could cause negative results for Resident #1 and cause serious injury or impairment. The DON confirmed that the Resident did not receive supervision, appropriate monitoring, or any Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care during the sixteen (16) plus hours when she was not in the facility. A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed Resident #1 missed the following physician orders for blood pressure at 7-10 P: Amlodipine, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet, Clonidine HCL and Hydralazine HCL Tablet. A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed Resident #1 missed the following physician orders to monitor access site Right Upper Arm for thrill & bruit, two times a day and observe dressing to right arm two times a day. A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed Resident #1 missed her diabetic medication and accucheck on 9/16/23 of Insulin Detemir Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliter) and accucheck is less than 60 mg/dl (deciliter) or greater than 400 mg/dl. A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed an order for Proventil HFA (bronchitis). Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/15/23, the following medications were coded as 3 (resident absent from home) and not administered for blood pressure Amlodipine, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet, Clonidine HCL and Hydralazine HCL Tablet. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/16/23, the following medications were coded as 3 (resident absent from home) and not administered: Insulin Detemir Solution, Accu check, and Proventil for bronchitis. In a record review Documentation Survey revealed, the facility failed to perform ADL (Activities of Daily Living) on Resident #1 for 16 hours and 15 minutes, on 9/15/23 through 9/16/23. Record review revealed Resident #1 had no progress reports from 9/7/23 till 9/16/23 at 9:40 AM. Record review of Resident #1's Progress Notes revealed, 9/16/23 09:40 (9:40 AM) Note Text, Arrived to facility at approx. (approximately) 8:40 AM in regards to resident being left on facility transport van overnight . MD (Medical Doctor) notified of incident and findings .Orders received to send to ER (Emergency Room). At approx. (approximately) 0920 (9:20 AM) Report was called to (Formal Name/local hospital) ER, Admin (Administrator) aware of incident and also at facility at this time. RP (Responsible Party) arrived to facility at approx. 0930 (9:30 AM) and Admin informed RP of incident and status of resident. Resident left facility at via stretcher at this time. The Emergency Department Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) from the local hospital confirmed in an interview on 9/27/23 at 4:15 PM, that she assessed and treated Resident #1 at the local hospital ED on 9/16/23 and that she had diagnosed Resident #1 with Heat Exposure, Neglect, and Abandonment. The EDNP confirmed her blood pressure was elevated and considered hospitalization. However, while blood tests revealed Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) levels elevated to approximately ten (10) times the normal levels, this finding did not reach the threshold for hospitalization. The EDNP explained that Resident #1's elevated CPK levels were indicative of the resident being in one position for an extended period of time which led to the breakdown of muscle tissue due to muscle damage. The EDNP stated that while Resident #1 did not have devastating results, her health was compromised. The EDNP stated that Resident #1 was in an extremely dangerous situation and noted conditions that contributed to this situation included having missed routinely scheduled doses of hypertension medications, food, and fluids for twenty-four (24) hours and exposure to hot, humid conditions for over sixteen (16) hours. The EDNP stated that Resident #1 had not received any psychosocial assessment during her time at the emergency department (ED). She stated that the ED's dedicated Case Worker was not on duty on 9/16/23 and that the Case Worker on duty had communicated with the facility related to giving a report to the staff and communication with the family of Resident #1 to confirm their approval to return Resident #1 to the facility. She stated that psychosocial assessments were normally under the canopy of a certified psychiatric provider. She stated that she had not completed a thorough psychosocial assessment. She said that she had only documented observations on the ED Progress/Discharge notes. Record review of the hospital emergency department (ED) report signed by Acute Care-NP; Emergency Medicine (EDNP) revealed that on 9/16/23. The PHYSICIAN ATTESTATION NOTE signed by the EDNP stated that Resident #1 was assessed and received treatment at the ED after being left in the transport vehicle overnight. Record review of the local hospital Emergency Department (ED) notes dated 9/16/23 revealed that Resident #1 was assessed and treated by ED Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) on 9/16/23 for Heat Exposure .Rhabdomyolysis .Adult Neglect or Abandonment .Elevated Blood Pressure Reading. Record review of the Progress Note dated 9/27/23, revealed Resident #1 was seen for counseling by a contracted Licensed Certified Social Worker (LCSW) on 9/27/23 with Chief complaint listed as A recent Incident. Resident was left overnight in the facility transport LCSW asked to assess resident 2* (secondary) to this event. The progress note review revealed Resident Quote; I thought I was doomed .Resident reports current emotional status or behavior as: Tired and concerned that the incident (being left in the transport van overnight) not be repeated and another resident suffer as she had. Today resident discussed: The Incident of being left in the transport van. Resident shared that she was anxious, hurting, and afraid. She explained that she got through the night by crying and being worried and didn't sleep at all. When asked if it was the most frightened, she had ever been in her life, resident stated it was not but close .she feels she was denied the help I was supposed to get and added she is resentful and angry about the incident . On 9/28/23 at 11:10 AM, a telephone interview with the facility's contracted Licensed Certified Social Worker (LCSW) revealed that regarding the cognitive level of Resident #1, the resident was able to express her feelings and needs verbally. She was sure Resident #1 remembered being in the facility van overnight on 9/15/23 because Resident #1 was able to describe being in the wheelchair and the van, and the pain and fear she felt. The LCSW stated that the incident was definitely detrimental in the way she was frightened and talked about not being provided with care. The LCSW reported that Resident #1 stated, I was denied the care I needed during their conversation on 9/27/23. The LCSW reported that effects from the incident may appear over time and said, That will be found out in days to come. The facility provided the following removal plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed Resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with Resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect.[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interventions to ensure Resident #1 received care and services for monitoring a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interventions to ensure Resident #1 received care and services for monitoring after hemodialysis, significant medications, accu check and activities of daily living, for one (1) of four (4) resident care plans. Resident #1. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 9/15/23 when Resident #1 was abandoned on the facility transport van. The facility failed to implement the plan of care for Resident #1 when Resident #1 was left unattended, unsupervised without care or monitoring following transportation from hemodialysis treatment. Resident #1 was abandoned and restrained by seat belts in a wheelchair in the facility transport van. The staff was unaware of Resident #1's absence from the facility from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 7:45 AM on 9/16/23 for over sixteen (16) hours without care as listed on the care plan, placed this resident, and other residents at risk, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 9/15/23, when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility van for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes following hemodialysis. The resident received no treatment, supervision, monitoring or care as designated per the care plan during this time. The IJ existed at: 42 CFR 483.21(b)(1) Comprehensive Care Plans - F656 - Scope and Severity J; The State Agency (SA) notified the facility Administrator of the IJ on 9/26/23 at 1:15 PM and provided the IJ template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.21(b)(1) Comprehensive Care Plans - F656 - Scope and Severity J; was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy Using the Care Plan with a revision date of 9/25/23, revealed, Policy statement: It is the policy of this facility that the care plan be used in developing the resident's daily care routines Record review of the Care Plans, undated, for Resident #1 revealed the following care plans were not implemented: Activities of Daily Living: Focus: I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) .Dementia .Interventions/Task, Eating, Toilet Use, Transfer . Hypertension: Focus: I have hypertension .Interventions/Task .Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Monitor for side effects . Impaired cognitive function: Focus: I have impaired cognitive function/dementia .Interventions/Task .Administer medications as ordered. Observe/document for side effects and effectiveness .Keep my routine consistent . Diabetes: Focus: I have Diabetes Mellitus .Interventions/ Task .Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness . Pain: Focus: I have acute/chronic pain .Interventions/Task .Administer analgesia as per orders .Evaluate effectiveness of pain interventions . Hemodialysis: Focus: I am on hemodialysis r/t renal failure .Interventions/Task .Check dressing daily at access site, monitor vital signs q (every) shift Skin integrity: Focus: I have potential for impairment to my skin integrity .Interventions/Task .Keep body parts from excessive moisture .Encourage .good nutrition and hydration . Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Focus: I have COPD .Interventions/Task Give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered. Monitor/document any side effects and effectiveness .Monitor for s/sx (signs or symptoms) of .Anxiety, Confusion, Restlessness, SOB (Shortness of Breath) at rest . A record review of the facility-reported investigation, dated 9/19/2023, revealed, Incident: During shift report on 9/16/2023 at approximately 7:00 am (AM), the night shift informed the oncoming shift that the resident did not return from dialysis on 9/15/2023. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van. Record review of the Documentation Survey Report .Tasks Only for Resident #1 for 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 revealed that there was no documentation of the resident receiving assistance in accordance with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment or the resident's care plan or physician orders for Bed Mobility, Hygiene, or Toilet Use on 9/15/23 through 6:59 PM on 9/16/23. There was no documentation for Eating and Drinking or percent of meals or nourishments/snacks eaten or fluid intake for 9/15/23 through 8:00 AM on 9/16/23. There was no documentation for Bladder continence or Bowel Movements and no observations of skin or behaviors recorded on 9/15/23 through 6:59 PM on 9/16/23. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/15/23, the following medications were coded as 3 (three) (absent from home) and not administered for blood pressure Amlodipine, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet, Clonidine HCL and Hydralazine HCL Tablet. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/16/23, the following medications were coded as 3 (absent from home) and not administered: Insulin Detemir Solution, Accu check, and Proventil for bronchitis. On 9/20/23 at 3:10 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed that she worked as the medication nurse on 9/15/23 7 PM-7 AM shift and confirmed she did not follow the care plan of giving Resident #1 her medications or checking her accu check. During the interview, she stated if the resident was available, she should have followed the care plan to provide her with medication because it is the process for staff to take care of the residents. On 9/20/23 at 3:20 PM, an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 confirmed that Resident #1 had not received any supervision, monitoring, care, food or fluids after the resident left for dialysis on 9/15/23 at approximately 10:00 AM through 7:00 PM when the CNA completed her shift. On 9/26/23 at 1:35 PM, an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) revealed it is my expectation that the nursing staff follow the care plans of all residents. The care plans provide a detailed and effective personalized outline of care for our residents. On 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM an interview with the Medical Director who is the primary physician confirmed that Resident #1 could have potentially suffered serious complications with her comorbidities; potentially serious injury or impairment, including but not limited to signs/symptoms (s/s) hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, s/s of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, negative effects of hypertension due to lack of monitoring while on the facility van for over sixteen (16) hours. The MD confirmed that he expected the facility nursing staff to follow the residents' care plans to ensure appropriate care for each resident. On 9/26/23 at 3:00 PM, an interview with LPN #2 reported that care plans were developed for individualized care and to ensure consistency in the nursing care of the resident, which helps improve services. LPN #2 added that she expects all nursing staff in the facility to follow care plans for the residents. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertensive, Insulin-Dependent, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 indicating Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Section G revealed for resident transfer, that the resident was an extensive assist with two people. Section H revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section J revealed Resident #1 experienced pain frequently. Section M revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. The facility provided the following removal plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 PM the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide resident centered care and services in accordance with the resident's individualized care plan and professional standards of practi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide resident centered care and services in accordance with the resident's individualized care plan and professional standards of practice that met Resident #1's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, Resident #1, as evidenced by the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility's transport van after returning to the facility from a dialysis appointment on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:45 PM. Resident #1 was left alone and unattended on the transport van for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration, care and assessments. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van and transferred the resident to their room in the facility. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing the resident's temperature 100.3 Fahrenheit, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, and Oxygen Saturation 100%. The facility did not obtain a blood glucose level at the time of assessment. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 9/15/23 when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility transport van. The facility's failure to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards to maintain a resident's highest practicable well-being placed Resident #1 and other residents who use the facility transport van in a situation with the likelihood of serious injury, harm, impairment or death. The IJ and SQC existed at: 42 CFR 483.25, Quality of Care - F684 Scope and Severity J The SA notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and SQC on 9/26/23 at 1:15 PM and provided the Administrator with the IJ template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ and SQC were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ and SQC was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity of 42 CFR 483.25, Quality of Care was lowered from a J to a Scope and Severity of D while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: The facility did not provide a specific policy on Quality of Care. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/15/23, the facility coded the following medications and services as '3' (resident absent from home) and failed to administer: Lyrica, Pravastatin Sodium, Risperdal, Amlodipine Besylate, Hydrocortisone Acetate, Lidocaine-Prilocaine, Memantine HCL, Metoprolol Tartrate, Clonidine HCL, Hydralazine HCL, Nephro-Vite, Proventil HFA, and Calazime, monitoring of access site, application of Nystatin external powder, observation of dressing right arm, vital signs, rate level of pain, monitor behaviors exhibited, or check fluids, . Boost was coded 1 away from home with meds. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/16/23, the facility coded the following as 3 (resident absent from home) and failed to administer: Insulin Detemir Solution, Protonix, Synthroid, Boost, Clonidine, Hydralazine, Nephro-Vite, and Proventil. Record review of the Documentation Survey Report .Tasks Only for Resident #1 for 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 revealed that there was no documentation of the resident receiving assistance in accordance with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment or the resident's care plan or physician orders for Bed Mobility, Hygiene, or Toilet Use from 9/15/23 through 9/16/23 at 6:59 PM. There was no documentation for Eating and Drinking or percent of meals or nourishments/snacks eaten or fluid intake from 9/15/23 through 8:00 AM on 9/16/23. There was no documentation for Bladder continence or Bowel Movements and no observations of skin or behaviors recorded on 9/15/23 through 6:59 PM on 9/16/23. Record review of the local hospital Emergency Department (ED) notes dated 9/16/23 revealed that Resident #1 was assessed and treated by ED Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) on 9/16/23 for Heat Exposure .Rhabdomyolysis .Adult Neglect or Abandonment .Elevated Blood Pressure Reading. On 9/20/23 at 3:10 PM, an interview with RN #2 revealed that she worked as the medication nurse for Transitional Care Unit (TCU) at the facility from 8:00 AM through 4:30 PM on 9/15/23. She said that Resident #1 was propelled to the facility van for transportation to a dialysis appointment on 9/15/23 between 9:45 (AM) and 10:00 (AM) as usual. RN #2 confirmed that she did not observe Resident #1 for the rest of the day. RN #2 stated that the facility did not send food, fluids or medications for residents to dialysis appointments. An interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 on 9/20/23 at 3:20 PM, revealed she worked 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM on 9/15/23 on the TCU and that she had mentioned to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 that Resident #1 was not in her room at approximately 7:00 PM, when the CNA had clocked out for the day and left the building. CNA #3 confirmed that Resident #1 had not received any supervision, monitoring, care, food or fluids after the resident left for dialysis at approximately 10:00 AM through 7:00 PM when the CNA left work on 9/15/23. In an interview with LPN #1 on 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, she confirmed that she was assigned to provide care for Resident #1 for the 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift on 9/15/23. She reported that she had arrived and clocked in at approximately 6:30 on 9/15/23 and relieved LPN #3 on the TCU and during shift change report, was told by LPN #3 that Resident #1 had not returned from her dialysis appointment. LPN #1 stated that Resident #1 had not received any supervision, monitoring, care, food, fluids, pain management or medications from 6:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM when the LPN had clocked and left the facility. In an interview on 9/21/23 at 2:28 PM, CNA #2 confirmed that AM (morning) care for each resident should include monitoring for and provision of incontinence/toileting needs, hygiene (which she said would include oral care/toothbrushing, washing hands and face, and use of personal care products of preference, such as deodorant/antiperspirant) and getting ready. CNA stated, Normally when she (Resident #1) gets back from dialysis, we heat her lunch up and she eats it and then she lays down cause she's tired from dialysis. Normally the Transportation Aide drops the resident off at the common area at the nurse's station and that's where she (Resident #1) eats her lunch. CNA #2 stated that Resident #1's CNA would then assist Resident #1 with transfer into bed and provide care as needed including monitoring for and provision of incontinence/toileting needs and hygiene. She stated that Resident #1 normally ate her evening meal (supper) in bed. CNA #2 confirmed that Resident #1 did not receive any care, monitoring (including monitoring of skin or behaviors), supervision, food, or fluids from 7:00 PM on 9/15/23 to 7:00 AM on 9/16/23, because she was on the van. CNA #2 stated that on 9/16/23 she and CNA #3 arrived on TCU unit at approximately 7:00 AM and asked the 7 PM-7 AM shift nurse and they told us that (Resident #1) had not come back from dialysis. She reported that they went down hall to do rounds and then, during breakfast, she (Resident #1) was found on the van on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. She stated that she had gone to the van and observed Resident #1 seated in her wheelchair on the van, sweaty with throw-up and drool on her mouth and clothes and that her skin was hot, hot. CNA #2 stated that Resident #1 required assistance with a bed bath, hygiene, eating, dressing and had her vital signs measured by staff upon return to her room at approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/23. On 9/21/23 at 3:00 PM, an interview with the facility Medical Director (MD), who was the Resident #1's primary physician, confirmed he had been made aware of the incident by the Administrator and DON on the morning of 9/16/23 at or about 8:40 AM and was told that the Transportation Aide forgot to transfer Resident #1 from the van to the facility on the evening of 9/15/23 upon return from a dialysis appointment and Resident #1 had spent the night in the van and was found on the van at approximately 7:45 AM on 9/16/23. The MD confirmed that the resident would have required monitoring for signs and symptoms of dehydration and monitoring of the dialysis shunt site for bleeding, which the facility failed to provide for over sixteen (16) hours due to Resident #1 being in the van without awareness of the staff. The MD confirmed that the resident did not receive any care supervision, monitoring, food, physician ordered medications or hydration from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 through approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/23. The Administrator revealed on 9/22/23 at 4:42 PM, during an interview that he was made aware on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:50 AM of the incident in which Resident #1 was left alone on the facility van following her dialysis treatment. The Administrator confirmed she was last observed by facility staff strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM and was located by facility staff still strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. He confirmed that Resident #1 did not receive any medications, food or fluids, care or services or monitoring for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes. On 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, an additional interview with the Medical Director confirmed that Resident #1 could have potentially suffered serious complications with her comorbidities; potentially serious injury or impairment, including but not limited to signs/symptoms (s/s) hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, s/s of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, negative effects of hypertension due to lack of monitoring while on the facility van for over sixteen (16) hours. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertensive Urgency, Long Term (current) use of Insulin, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, long-term current use of insulin, Dependence on renal dialysis, End stage renal disease, and Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease, or End Stage Renal. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 07 indicating Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Section G revealed for resident transfer, that the resident was extensive assist with two people. Section H revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section J revealed the resident had pain frequently. Section M revealed that the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. The facility provided the following Removal Plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ and SQC was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision for a resident who was left alone, abandoned, strapped in her wheelchair without monitoring on the fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision for a resident who was left alone, abandoned, strapped in her wheelchair without monitoring on the facility transport van following a dialysis treatment for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes for one (1) of four (4) Residents reviewed. Resident #1. The facility failed to remove the resident from the facility van following transportation from her hemodialysis treatment, abandoning the resident restrained by seat belts in a wheelchair in the facility transport van, without supervision or monitoring. The staff was unaware of Resident #1's location from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 7:45 AM on 9/16/23. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 9/15/23 when Resident #1 was abandoned on the facility transport van. The facility's failure to supervise Resident #1 placed this resident, and other resident, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 9/15/23, when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility van for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes following hemodialysis. The resident received no treatment, supervision, monitoring or care during this time. The IJ and SQC existed at: CFR 483.25(d)(2) Accidents - F689 Scope and Severity J The State Agency (SA) notified the facility Administrator of the IJ and SQC on 9/26/23 at 1:15 PM. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/27/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed on 9/27/23 to remove the IJ on 9/28/23. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ and SQC were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for F689 - 483.25(d)(2) Accidents scope and severity J was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Accidents and Incidents with a revision date of 9/25/23, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility that the resident environment remains as free of accidents and hazards as possible, and those residents receive supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents whenever possible . A record review of the Facility Investigation, dated 9/19/2023, revealed, during shift report on 9/16/2023 at approximately 7:00 am (AM), the night shift informed the oncoming shift that the resident did not return from dialysis on 9/15/2023. At approximately 7:50 AM on 9/16/2023, the facility staff located Resident #1 still strapped in the facility transport van. A record review of Resident #1's Incident Report revealed, 9/16/23 13:38 (1:38 PM), .writer notified of resident being left in facility transport van after dialysis yesterday evening. Resident was located in facility van the AM . A record review of the Transportation Aide (TA's) written statement revealed, on 9/16/23, .Arrived at (Proper Name/facility) I noticed a elderly women falling so I jumped out of van to assist her the lady told me she was to weak then pulled off. I went back inside (Proper Name of facility) to finish up normal routine and left for the day. Around 7:15 AM I got a call asking about Resident #1 and I asked the nurse to check the bus .I would like to add that I arrived at (Proper Name of facility) at or about 3:30 PM with Resident #1 . An interview with the TA on 9/20/23 at 4:05 PM, revealed that 9/15/23, After receiving Resident #1 from dialysis, I drove back to the facility and parked the van, with Resident #1 secured in the van. The TA noticed a visitor who was in distress in the parking lot and assisted the visitor. Following the incident with the visitor, she clocked out and left the facility. The following morning, she received a phone call from the facility questioning where Resident #1 was located. At that moment, she realized she had not transferred the resident from the van to the facility. The resident remained unattended for approximately 16 hours while in the facility van. A record review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1's written statement revealed, . On 9/15/23, I received a report that patient had not returned from dialysis. After completed pm (PM) med (medication) pass resident had still not returned. At around 10 or so I tried to call (Professional Name/Dialysis) with no answer. Reported to the oncoming nurse that she had not returned from dialysis . On 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, an interview with LPN #1 confirmed she was assigned to Resident #1 on 9/15/23 at 7:00 PM until 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM. LPN #1 stated that on 9/15/23 at 10:00 PM, Resident #1 did not receive her medications and was not in the building. She assumed she was at the hospital or still at dialysis. She attempted to contact dialysis unsuccessfully and passed on to the oncoming nurse on 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM that Resident #1 was not in the building. On 9/20/23 at 10:25 AM, an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that Resident #1 was left in the facility transport van, strapped in her wheelchair from 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM until 9/16/23 at 7:45 AM, when she was located by the facility staff. The DON revealed the resident was unattended for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes. During an interview on 9/20/23 at 3:40 PM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #3 revealed that she worked the day shift at the facility on Friday, 9/15/23, until 7:00 PM and confirmed Resident #1 was not in the facility. She reported to the night shift nurse (LPN #1) that Resident #1 was not in the facility. When she arrived at work on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM, Resident #1 was in the facility van strapped in her wheelchair. A record review Registered Nurse (RN) #1's written statement revealed, .At approximately 7:10, I was notified by night shift nurse and oncoming nurse and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) that resident did not return to facility from Dialysis on 9/15/23. Night shift nurse stated, I do not know where she is, I did not realize she was still gone around 10 pm (PM). Called TA, she stated, Oh my gosh, check the van. Resident was seen in the van, shoulders moving up and down indicating she was breathing. On 9/21/23 at 9:23 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed on 9/16/23 that she was informed that Resident #1 was not in the building. She stated she started making phone calls to locate the resident. The TA advised her to look in the facility van, where she was located still strapped in her wheelchair. Resident #1 was strapped in her wheelchair and the facility van for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes with no supervision. In an interview on 9/22/23 at 4:42 PM, with the Administrator, confirmed Resident #1 was last observed on the facility van when she was transported from dialysis on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM. The Administrator conveyed that he was informed on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:50 AM of the incident that Resident #1 was left unattended on the facility van following her dialysis treatment for approximately 16 hours and 15 minutes, with no supervision. In an interview on 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, with the Medical Director (MD) revealed the potential for serious complications for Resident #1 for being unsupervised and left in the facility van for over 16 hours. In an interview on 9/26/23 at 1:35 PM, with the DON revealed that on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM, the TA left Resident #1 in the facility van and was found on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. The DON stated that the resident not receiving medications, supervision, or monitoring for over sixteen (16) hours could have resulted in serious injury or impairment. The DON confirmed that the Resident did not receive supervision, appropriate monitoring or any Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, during the sixteen (16) plus hours when she was not in the facility. On 9/27/23 at 3:13 PM, an interview with RN #4 from the dialysis clinic confirmed Resident #1's dialysis was completed, and she was transported from the dialysis clinic to the facility on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:15 PM, by a facility staff member. She was unsure of who performed the transport. Record review of the local weather temperature for 9/15/23 at approximately 3:45 pm through 9/16/23 at 8:40 AM, when the facility located Resident #1, ranged from 89 degrees Fahrenheit to 77 degrees Fahrenheit and was obtained at https://www.timeanddate.com. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertension, Insulin-Dependent, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic kidney disease. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 indicating Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Section G revealed for resident transfer that the resident was an extensive assist with two people. Section H revealed the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section J revealed Resident #1 experienced pain frequently. Section M revealed that the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. The facility provided the following Removal Plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3 Fahrenheit, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed Resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with Resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received care and services following a hemodialysis treatment consistent with professional stan...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received care and services following a hemodialysis treatment consistent with professional standards of practice including ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications after dialysis treatments for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed, Resident #1 as evidenced by the facility failed to remove the resident from the facility van on 9/15/23 following their transportation from the dialysis facility, leaving the resident strapped in a wheelchair restrained by the seatbelts in the facility van for sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes without the staff's monitoring. The facility's failure to provide treatment, monitoring, care, food, or fluids after hemodialysis placed this resident and other residents in a situation that has caused and is likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) that began on 9/15/23, when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility van. The IJ and SQC existed at: 42 CFR 483.25(l) Dialysis - F698 Scope and Severity J. The SA notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and SQC on 9/26/23 and provided the Administrator with the IJ template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ and SQC were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ and SQC was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity of 42 CFR 483.25(l) Dialysis - F698 was lowered from a J to D while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy, Clinical Practice Guideline Dialysis-Hemodialysis dated March 24, 2010, revealed the Objectives .To ensure the resident is assessed and/or observed appropriately .to ensure adequate nutrition and hydration .The access device should be observed for complications at least every shift and more frequently if the resident has just been dialyzed. These observations should include the appearance of the device, and the presence or absence of sign/symptoms of infection, and the presence of bruit or thrill if applicable. Observations of the resident's mental status, dialysis access, respiratory status, body/skin condition, pain status, and urine output should be done pre and post dialysis .Ongoing observations/assessments of the resident's skin should be done. Ongoing observations/assessments of the resident's fluid balance, nutritional state, mental status, respiratory status, and cardiovascular status should be done. In an interview on 9/20/23 at 4:05 PM, the Transportation Aide (TA) revealed that on 9/15/23 she had transported Resident #1 from the dialysis facility following the resident's dialysis treatment to the facility at approximately 3:45 PM. She said she encountered a situation in the parking lot upon return to the facility, prior to unloading Resident #1, in which she had gone to the assistance of a visitor. She stated that she went inside the facility and forgot to unload Resident #1. The TA stated that after checking to see if she had any more transports for the day (and discovering that she did not) she clocked out and left the facility and left Resident #1 secured in her wheelchair in the van. She said she did not think any more about Resident #1 until she received a telephone call the following morning from Registered Nurse (RN) #2 who asked her if she had picked Resident #1 up from the dialysis facility. The TA stated she immediately told RN #2 to go check the van. Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #3 revealed on 9/20/23 at 3:20 PM, in an interview that she had worked 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM on 9/15/23 on TCU and that she had mentioned to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 that Resident #1 was not in her room at approximately 7:00 PM, when the CNA clocked out for the day and left the building. CNA #3 confirmed that Resident #1 had not received any observation, monitoring, care, food, or fluids after the resident left for dialysis at approximately 10:00 AM through 7:00 PM when the CNA left work on 9/216/23. In an interview on 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed she was assigned to provide care for Resident #1 from 7:00 PM on 9/15/21 to 7:00 AM on 9/16/23. She reported that she had arrived and clocked in at approximately 6:30 PM on 9/15/23 and relieved LPN #3 on the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) and during shift change report was told by LPN #3 that Resident #1 had not returned from her dialysis appointment. LPN #1 stated that at approximately 10:00 PM on 9/15/23 she noted that the only resident she had not completed medication administration for was Resident #1 and she had attempted to contact the dialysis facility by telephone without success but did not attempt to contact anyone else. LPN #1 stated that Resident #1 had not received any observation, monitoring, care, food, or fluids from 6:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM when the LPN had left the facility with no knowledge of the location of the resident. CNA #2 revealed on 9/21/23 at 2:28 PM, during an interview that Resident #1 did not receive any care, monitoring, observation, or fluids from 7:00 PM on 9/15/23 to 7:00 AM on 9/15/23, because she was on the van. CNA #2 stated that on 9/16/23 she and CNA #3 arrived on the TCU at approximately 7:00 AM and asked the 7PM-7AM shift nurse and they told us that (Resident #1) had not come back from dialysis. She reported that they went down hall to do rounds and then, during breakfast, she (Resident #1) was found on the van at approximately 7:45 AM. She stated that she had gone to the van and observed Resident #1 secured in her wheelchair on the van, sweaty with throw-up and drool on her mouth and clothes and that her skin was hot, hot. On 9/21/23 at 3:00 PM, during an interview with the facility Medical Director (MD), who was Resident #1's primary physician, he confirmed that the resident would have required monitoring for signs and symptoms of dehydration and monitoring of the dialysis shunt site for bleeding, which the facility failed to provide for over sixteen (16) hours due to Resident #1 being in the van without awareness of the staff. The Administrator revealed on 9/22/23 at 4:42 PM, during an interview that he was made aware on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:50 AM of the incident in which Resident #1 was left alone on the facility van following her dialysis treatment. The Administrator confirmed she was last observed by facility staff strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM and was located by facility staff still strapped in her wheelchair on the facility van on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. He confirmed that Resident #1 did not receive any medications, food or fluids, care or services or monitoring for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes. On 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, in a later interview with the MD, he confirmed that Resident #1 could have potentially suffered serious complications with her comorbidities including potentially serious injury or impairment due to lack of monitoring and care while on the facility van for over sixteen (16) hours. The MD stated that there were additional risks related to no fluids provided to the resident for over 16 hours following hemodialysis. He stated that following dialysis monitoring of the resident's vital signs and monitoring for bleeding at the access site would have been important. Record review of the local hospital Emergency Department (ED) notes dated 9/16/23 revealed that Resident #1 was assessed and treated by ED Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) on 9/16/23 for Heat Exposure .Rhabdomyolysis .Adult Neglect or Abandonment .Elevated Blood Pressure Reading. The ED notes included consideration of intravenous fluids avoided due to the residents diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease. On 9/27/23 at 4:15 PM, an interview with the EDNP revealed that she considered Resident to #1 to be a risk for several potential negative cardiac results of having sat up in a wheelchair without care or repositioning for over sixteen (16) hours which included Rhabdomyolysis, Heat Exposure and Elevated Blood Pressure. Record review of Resident #1's 9/2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 9/15/23 the following were coded as '3' for (resident absent from home) and not administered: prescribed fluids to be provided related to dialysis, monitoring dialysis access site, observation of dressing right arm, and vital signs. Record review of the interdisciplinary progress notes for Resident #1 for September 2023 revealed there were no entries that documented the resident leaving or returning to the facility for or following dialysis appointments/treatments. Record review of the Dialysis Transfer Forms for Resident #1 for September 2023 revealed that out of ten (10) forms, four (4) of the forms were completed in the section labeled Upon Return to Facility Following Dialysis; the section was not completed for the Dialysis Transfer Form dated 9/15/23. Record review of the Sign Out binder at the TCU nurses' station and the [NAME] Hall nurses stations for September 2023 revealed that there were no entries that documented any of the sampled residents, who relied on the facility for transportation for dialysis treatments at a dialysis unit outside of the facility, having been signed out or back in from dialysis appointments prior to 9/16/23. Record review of the Documentation Survey Report .Tasks Only for Resident #1 for 9/15/23 and 9/16/23 revealed that there was no documentation of the resident receiving assistance in accordance with the MDS assessment or the resident's care plan or physician orders for 'Eating and Drinking' or percent of meals or nourishments/snacks eaten or fluid intake for 9/15/23 through 8:00 AM on 9/16/23. There was no documentation for observations by Certified Nurse's Aides (CNAs) on 9/15/23 through 6:59 PM on 9/16/23. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure, Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease or End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Diabetes, Hypertensive Urgency, and Long Term (current) use of Insulin. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 for Resident #1 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 07, which indicated severe cognitive impairment and Section O indicated that the resident received renal dialysis. The facility provided the following Removal Plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed Resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and immediacy removed it on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to ensure the safety and the necessary care and services for one (1) of four (4) residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to ensure the safety and the necessary care and services for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed, Resident #1. The facility failed to identify the location of a resident when the resident failed to return to the facility unit following transportation from her hemodialysis treatment. This resulted in the facility abandoning the resident restrained by seat belts in a wheelchair in the facility transport van, without supervision or monitoring. The staff was unaware of Resident #1's absence from the facility from approximately 3:30 PM on 9/15/23 through 7:45 AM on 9/16/23. The facility's failure to staff the facility sufficiently resulted in Resident #1 been left unattended in the facility van for over sixteen (16) hours. This placed Resident #1 in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 9/15/23, when the facility failed to locate Resident #1 on the facility van for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes following hemodialysis. The resident received no treatment, supervision, monitoring or care during this time. The IJ existed at: 42 CFR 483.35(a) Sufficient Staff - F725 Scope and Severity J The State Agency (SA) notified the facility Administrator of the IJ on 9/26/23 at 1:15 PM and the IJ template was provided to the Administrator. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.35(a) Sufficient Staff F725 J was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Staffing . revised October 2017 revealed Our facility provides sufficient staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment .Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care . During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2 on 9/20/23 at 3:40 PM, RN #2 reported that she was 'usually' the RN Supervisor Monday through Friday of each week from 8:00 AM through 4:30 PM but had worked the cart as the medication/charge nurse on the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) on 9/15/23 due to a staff member scheduled to work had called off work. She confirmed that this left the unit without an RN Supervisor for the day shift on 9/15/23. She stated also that a new resident was admitted by the facility TCU shortly after 4:00 PM on 9/15/23. She confirmed that new admissions required additional time from staff for orientation to their surroundings, audits, monitoring for pain and overall condition and to establish a baseline to determine care needs. She reported that she was relieved by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 at 4:30 PM. She stated that during the shift change report she had informed LPN #3 that Resident #1 had not returned from dialysis. RN #2 said she then went to the [NAME] unit to work until 7:00 PM due to staff calling off work. During an interview with LPN #3 on 9/20/23 at 4:52 PM, confirmed that she had been told by RN #2 during shift change report at 4:30 PM on 9/15/23 that Resident #1 had not returned from the dialysis unit. LPN #3 confirmed that she had not been concerned when Resident #1 had not returned by 6:30 PM when she gave shift change report to LPN #1. She stated that she left the facility without contacting the dialysis unit, the Responsible Party (RP) for Resident #1 or the Director of Nurses (DON). During an interview with LPN #1 on 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, the LPN said that she was not concerned that Resident #1 had not returned from the dialysis unit when she initially assumed responsibility for the residents on TCU between 6:30 PM and 7:00 PM on 9/15/23. She said that on 9/15/23 at approximately 10:00 PM, after she had finished medication administration rounds, she 'realized' that Resident #1 had not returned. LPN #1 stated that she attempted to contact the dialysis unit by telephone without success. LPN #1 described the 7:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift on 9/15/23 as hectic and said she had one CNA assisting her to care for twenty-nine (29) to thirty (30) TCU residents. LPN #1 stated, that between 10:00 PM and 10:30 PM on 9/15/23 There was a new admit coming in and problems with another new resident. She said it was possible that if she had more staff present on the evening of 9/15/23 she would have had more time to give to locating Resident #1. LPN #1 stated, there was a lot going on and we were trying to make it work, She confirmed that after she called the dialysis unit, she did not make any further efforts to determine the whereabouts of Resident #1 or notify the DON or the resident's Responsible Party (RP) of the resident's absence. LPN #1 confirmed that because the resident was unsupervised in the facility van in the facility parking lot she had not received food, fluids, care, medications or monitoring following dialysis treatment, which LPN #1 described as very heartbreaking. On 9/21/23 at 9:48 AM, an interview with LPN #4 revealed that she became aware that Resident #1 was missing from the facility when she was making 'first rounds' shortly after 7:00 AM on 9/16/23 and directly observed that the resident was not in her room. She said she asked LPN #1 where Resident #1 was to which LPN #1 responded I didn't even know she wasn't here till after 10:00 (PM) last night. On 9/27/23 at 1:30 PM, an interview with the DON reported that there was one (1) LPN and one (1) CNA responsible for the care of the residents on each unit of the facility (TCU and West) from 7:00 PM on 9/15/23 through 7:00 AM on 9/16/23. She confirmed that it was possible that more staff on the shift may have led to staff locating Resident #1 sooner. She confirmed that prior to the incident the facility had not scheduled an additional staff member to accompany residents for medical appointments, with the driver being the sole staff member responsible for loading, transporting, unloading, and supervising residents during transportation. She confirmed that an additional staff accompanying Resident #1 for the return to the facility may have prevented the resident being left unsupervised on the facility van. The DON reported that there were two additional CNAs scheduled to work 9/15/23 at 7:00 PM through 7:00 AM on 9/16/23 that had called off work due to testing positive for COVID-19 and were not replaced on the schedule because there was no one available. On 9/27/23 at 5:05 PM, an interview with the Administrator confirmed he had completed a Facility Assessment, which was updated annually, was utilized in staffing decisions. The Administrator stated that staffing needs change often based on need determined by the number and acuity of residents. He reported that the facility did not employ agency staffing. The Administrator said that employees calling off work could sometimes be an issue. He stated that he had not been notified by the DON of a need for additional staff. He stated that if he were made aware of a need for additional staff he could reach out to sister facilities for additional staff to meet the care needs of residents. He confirmed that he had not done so for 9/15/23. He stated that on 9/15/23 the facility could have had more staff and that the staffing for 9/15/23 had not been by design. The Administrator clarified that by design there was supposed to be more staff but that had changed due to staff calling off work due to staff testing positive for COVID-19. Record review of the local hospital Emergency Department (ED) notes dated 9/16/23 revealed that Resident #1 was assessed and treated by ED Nurse Practitioner (EDNP) on 9/16/23 for Heat Exposure, Rhabdomyolysis, Adult Neglect or Abandonment, and Elevated Blood Pressure Reading. The ED notes included consideration of intravenous fluids avoided due to the resident's diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease. The EDNP confirmed on 9/27/23 at 4:15 PM, during a telephone interview, that providing assessment and care for Resident #1 on 9/16/23 was important. She stated that the incident was extremely dangerous for Resident #1 and that the resident's health was absolutely compromised. During a telephone interview on 9/28/23 at 11:10 AM, the contracted Licensed Certified Social Worker (LCSW) revealed that she had counseled Resident #1 at or about 5:00 PM on 9/27/23. Following her assessment, she had diagnosed Resident #1 with Acute Reaction to Stress and had recommended monitoring for adverse effects for at least ninety days. The LCSW stated that Resident #1 had reported feeling doomed, anxious, fearful and worried. The LCSW stated, I definitely believe it was detrimental in the way she was frightened and talked about not being provided with the care she needed Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertensive Urgency, Long Term (current) use of Insulin, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, long-term current use of insulin, Dependence on renal dialysis, and Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease, or End Stage Renal. The facility provided the following Removal Plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed Resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review the facility failed to ensure signific...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review the facility failed to ensure significant medication (anti-diabetic, anti-hypertension, bronchitis, and pain management medications) were administered to prevent discomfort or complications for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed, Resident #1. The State Agency (SA) conducted an onsite investigation from 9/20/23 through 9/28/23. On 9/15/23 the facility failed to remove the resident from the facility van following their transportation from the dialysis facility, leaving the resident strapped in a wheelchair in the facility van, unsupervised and without significant medications including insulin, respiratory and hypertensive medications for sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes without the staff awareness. The facility's failure to transfer Resident #1 inside the facility and administer medications as ordered by the physician after hemodialysis placed Resident #1 in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 9/15/23, when the facility abandoned Resident #1 on the facility van for approximately sixteen (16) hours and fifteen (15) minutes following hemodialysis and did not receive medications as ordered by the physician. The IJ and SQC existed at: 42 CFR 483.45(f)(2) Residents are free of any significant medication errors - F760, Scope and Severity J'. The SA notified the facility's Administrator of the IJ and SQC on 9/26/23 and provided the Administrator with the IJ template. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 9/28/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ and SQC were completed on 9/27/23 and the IJ was removed on 9/28/23. The SA validated the Removal Plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ and SQC was removed on 9/28/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity of 42 CFR 483.45(f)(2) Residents are free of any significant medication errors - F760 was lowered from a J to a D while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines with a current revision date, August 25, 2014, revealed, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices .Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time, except before or after meals order, which are administered based on mealtimes. Unless otherwise specified by the prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration scheduled for the facility. A record review of the Facility Investigation, dated 9/19/2023, revealed, Incident: During shift report on 9/16/2023 at approximately 7:00 am (AM), the night shift informed the oncoming shift that the resident did not return from dialysis on 9/15/2023. A record review of a written statement by Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed, on 9/15/23 she received report that patient (Resident #1) had not returned from dialysis. After completing pm (PM) med (medication) pass, the resident had still not returned. At around 10 (PM) or so I tried to call (Professional Name Dialysis Center) with no answer. Reported told day shift nurse that she had not returned from dialysis . A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed Resident #1 missed the following physician orders for blood pressure medication that was scheduled from 7 PM until 10 PM: Amlodipine, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet, Clonidine HCL and Hydralazine HCL Tablet. A record review of the Order Summary Report as of 9/25/23 revealed Resident #1 missed her diabetic medication (insulin) and accucheck on 9/16/23. She also missed accucheck parameter monitoring with orders to report to the physician if the blood glucose was less than 60 mg/dl (milligrams/deciliter) or greater than 400 mg/dl. A record review of the Order Summary Report also revealed Proventil HFA (bronchitis) was missed for Resident #1's breathing. In an interview on 9/20/23 at 5:15 PM, with LPN #1 revealed that she worked 9/15/23 from 7:00 PM until 9/16/23 at 7:00 AM. LPN #1 confirmed that Resident #1 did not receive her accucheck (blood sugar checks) on 9/15/23 in the evening and on 9/16/23 in the morning. Resident #1 did not receive her significant medications, such as blood pressure, bronchitis inhaler, and insulin. LPN #1 stated that since Resident #1 did not receive her blood pressure medications, a bronchitis inhaler or accucheck with insulin, this could have caused Resident #1's blood pressure to be elevated and caused a hypertensive crisis. Since the resident did not receive her inhaler, she could have been experiencing shortness of breath. Resident #1's accucheck was not checked nor was her insulin given, since neither was performed, she may have been hypo or hyperglycemic (high or low blood sugar levels), which would have been dangerous to her health. Record review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 9/1/23 - 9/30/23 confirmed on 9/15/23, the following medications were coded (documented) as 3 (resident absent from home) and not administered for blood pressure Amlodipine, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet, Clonidine HCL and Hydralazine HCL Tablet. Record review of Resident #1's [DATE]/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed on 9/16/23, the following medications were coded (documented) as 3 (resident absent from home) and not administered: Insulin Detemir Solution, Accu check, and Proventil for bronchitis. Record review of Resident #1's [DATE]/1/23 - 9/30/23 revealed the following medications were coded (documented) as a 3 (resident absent from home) on 9/15/23: Lidocaine-Prilocaine cream to left hand and Lyrica for Neuropathy. Ultram (Tramadol) was ordered every 12 hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 received Ultram daily from 9/1/23 - 9/14/23. Three of these 14 days, the resident received Ultram twice a day. The facility Medical Director reported during an interview on 9/26/23 at 10:20 AM, Missed medications are always a concern; that, among other things, is the reason I wanted her to go to the emergency room (ER), so they could look at her, check labs, etc. The Medical Director stated there was potential for serious complications for Resident #1, especially with her comorbidities. An interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 9/26/23 at 1:35 PM, revealed that on 9/15/23 at approximately 3:30 PM, the Transportation Aide (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility van and was found on 9/16/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. The DON stated that the resident not receiving her significant medication for blood pressure, diabetes, and an inhaler could have caused serious injury or impairment. She stated that the failure of the facility to ensure the resident received the morning dose of insulin and monitoring of the blood glucose for Resident #1 on the morning of 9/16/23 could have resulted in the resident experiencing signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia. The DON confirmed that failure to monitor the resident dialysis graph/shunt site could have resulted in bleeding at the site, which could have resulted in the resident losing blood or hemorrhaging. She stated that monitoring the site following a dialysis appointment was very important for the resident's safety. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 12/20/22 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Hypertensive, Insulin-Dependent, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/7/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 07 indicating Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Section J revealed the resident had pain frequently. The facility provided the following Removal Plan on 9/28/23. On 9/26/2023 1:15 pm the State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility neglected to provide care and services for Resident #1 from approximately 3:45 pm on 9/15/2023 until approximately 7:45 am on 9/16/2023, failed to notify the Physician timely of a change in condition after resident was left in the transport van, alone and unattended by a staff member which resulted in Resident #1 missing medications, meals, hydration and post dialysis site care/assessments. On 9/15/2023 the Transportation Assistant (TA) left Resident #1 in the facility vehicle after returning to the facility from dialysis at approximately 3:45 pm. The facility staff located Resident #1 and removed her from the facility vehicle at approximately 7:50 am on 9/16/2023, assisted Resident #1 back in the facility, transferred Resident #1 to bed, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 completed an assessment revealing a temperature 100.3, blood pressure 175/79, pulse 97, Oxygen Saturation 100%. The nurse did not obtain blood sugar at this time. The physician was notified of the incident at approximately 8:40 am on 9/16/2023 by the Director of Nursing. The Resident Representative was notified of the incident at approximately 9:15 am on 9/16/2023 by the Administrator. 1. 9/16/2023 8:40 am the DON (Director of Nurses) arrived at the facility, assessed Resident #1 and noted that resident was at baseline. 2. On 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and received an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. 3. 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. 4. 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. 5. 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. 6. On 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the investigation revealed that when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. LPN #1 received in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis and did not follow up to determine where the resident was located. 7. On 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. QAPI minutes included: Review of the incident, investigation and missing resident policy. Review of immediate actions taken. Recommendations to prevent reoccurrence were to complete in-service for all staff regarding missing residents prior to working, in-service for nurses to include if the reason why a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the record to notify the supervisor immediately, initiate a log for 2 people to document that the facility vehicle is checked at the end of each day and after each transport, conduct a missing person drill on each shift, initiate 2 staff members to ride on the facility vehicle for all resident transports and educate all transportation drivers of new procedures. 8. On 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. 9. 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. 10. 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. 11. 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The missing resident drill consisted of a resident being hidden in the Administrator's office and was identified by a staff member who did a sweep of the office areas and the staff member immediately reported to the Administrator that the resident was found. No changes to policy and procedure needed. 12. On 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. 13. 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. 14. 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. 15. On 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. 16. 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. -The Committee reviewed the incident, the Immediate Jeopardies cited by the state agency on 9/26/2023, and the policies regarding abuse and neglect, supervision of residents, dialysis care, diabetic care, timely notification of the physician, accidents, staffing and care plans. The following recommendations were discussed. The root cause analysis revealed that the TA was distracted and as a result left Resident #1 on the facility vehicle. It also revealed that the nurse failed to follow proper procedure to investigate why Resident #1 did not return from dialysis that resulted in the resident not being located in a timely manner which resulted in the resident not receiving proper dialysis care, diabetic care and medications. There were no recommendations to make changes to any policies by the QAPI Team and all interventions that were put into place were effective. The MDS Nurse will conduct another audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving dialysis and diabetic care. The MDS Nurse will conduct an audit of the care plans for 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services. The Social Service Director will evaluate Resident #1 for signs of psychosocial harm due to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. The facility assessment was reviewed and updated regarding staffing according to the acuity of the residents. The Committee determined at this time the staffing required for the night shift is 4 Certified Nursing Assistants and 2 Nurses. If these requirements are not met the nurse will contact the DON and Administrator and they will make arrangements to cover staffing needs by contacting all employees, department heads and sister facilities as needed to fill gaps. DON will provide in-service for all staff regarding abuse/neglect, accidents, and supervision of residents. DON will provide in-service for all nursing staff regarding staffing, care plans, diabetic care, dialysis care and timely notification of the physician. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 17. 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs and noted no signs of psychosocial harm related to the incident that occurred on 9/15/2023. 18. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 19. 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. 20. On 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident. The facility alleges removal of the immediacy on 9/28/2023. The SA validated the removal plan on 9/28/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 9/28/23 prior to exit. The SA validated through interview and record review that the DON stated she arrived on 9/16/2023 8:40 am and assessed Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 the Medical Director was notified at 8:40 am and gave an order to send to the emergency room for evaluation. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:15 am the Administrator notified the State Department of Health of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 9:40 am Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility at 2:30 pm. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 10:00 am the DON conducted a 100% head count of all residents in the facility and audited records of all residents that were out of the facility to ensure adequate documentation with no negative findings. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:10 am the facility initiated an investigation that revealed when the TA arrived at the facility on 9/15/2023 with Resident #1 she noticed a visitor almost fall, got out of the vehicle to assist then went in the facility not realizing that the Resident #1 was still on the van. The SA validated that the facility investigation also revealed LPN #1 did not follow up to determine where the resident was located when told in report on 9/15/2023 at 7:00 pm that Resident #1 did not return from dialysis. The SA validated through interviews, observations, and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 at 10:45 am an emergency Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 that occurred on 9/15/2023. In attendance were the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Regional Director of Operations, Regional Nurse Consultant, Medical Records Nurse, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, RN Supervisor, Medical Director, and Dietary Manager. The SA validated through staff interviews and record reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:30 the DON began in-service for all staff regarding missing residents and all nurses to include if the reason a resident is not in the facility is not documented in the progress note to notify the supervisor immediately, no staff was allowed to work until receiving in-service. The SA validated through observation, interviews, and record reviews that on 9/18/2023 11:30 am the Director of Nursing created a log to be placed on the facility vehicle and in-serviced all transportation drivers regarding signing in and out with a witness after every transport and at the end of each day to verify that no residents are on the transport van. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/16/2023 11:58 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on day shift. The SA validated through interviews and documentation reviews that on 9/17/2023 6:30 am the Administrator conducted a missing resident drill for all staff on night shift. The SA validated through interview that on 9/18/2023 at 11 am the Administrator notified the Attorney General's office of the incident. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/19/2023 at 10 am the DON in-serviced all staff on abuse and neglect policies. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/19/2023 at 6:30 pm the MDS Nurse audited 100 % of the records for all residents receiving dialysis to include care plans with no adverse findings. On 9/26/2023 at 8 pm the MDS nurse audit the care plans of 100% of residents receiving routine transportation services, dialysis, and diabetic care with no adverse findings. The SA validated through interview that on 9/20/2023 at 2:40 PM the Administrator notified the local police department of the incident involving Resident #1. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 2:34 pm an emergency QAPI meeting was held regarding the incident involving Resident #1 being left on the van on 9/15/2023. Those in attendance were Administrator, DON, IP, Social Service Director, Medical Records, Business Office Manager, Customer Relations Specialist, RN Supervisor, MDS Nurse and Medical Director. The SA validated through interview and record review that on 9/26/2023 3:00 pm the Social Service Director spoke with resident #1 concerning her psychosocial needs. The SA validated through interviews and staff sign in sheets that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all staff regarding accidents, supervision of residents and abuse/neglect. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that on 9/26/2023 5:00 pm the DON began in-servicing all nursing staff regarding diabetic care, dialysis care, staffing, notifying the physician in a timely manner and care plans. All staff will receive in-service prior to returning to work. The SA validated through interview and documentation review that on 9/27/2023 at 5:00 pm the Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) assessed Resident #1 concerning her psychological needs and concerns regarding the incident on 9/15/2023 the LCSW concluded, bothered but not overly traumatized by the event as evidenced by her willingness to stay, having stated faith in caregivers/staff here, continue to monitor Resident.
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents' individual preference were followed related to resident choice of the type of b...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents' individual preference were followed related to resident choice of the type of bath they preferred for two (2) of seven (7) sampled residents. Resident #4 and Resident #6. Findings include: Review of the facility's procedure, Bath, Shower/Tub, dated August 25, 2014, revealed, .The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin .Documentation .The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL (Activity of Daily Living) record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the shower/bath was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath. 3. Data obtained during the shower/bath .4. How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason (s) why and the intervention taken. Reporting .1. Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath . Resident #4 During an interview with Resident #4 on 8/14/23 at 8:45 PM, she said that she does not receive a shower, and the facility had told her that she could have showers three times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays (TTS). Resident #4 expressed that she did not feel clean with bed baths and had reported her concerns to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Ombudsman. In an interview on 8/15/23 at 3:30 PM (Tuesday), with Resident #4, she stated that the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had given her a bed bath and she did not receive a shower again. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 09:00 AM, with CNA #1, she confirmed that Resident # 4 did not receive a shower on 8/15/23 because the resident had refused. CNA #1 said she gave the resident a full bed bath and reported the refusal to the nurses. CNA #1 confirmed that she failed to document the resident's refusal to take a shower on the task sheet. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 09:15 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she denied that she was informed that Resident #4 had refused her shower on 8/15/23. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 09:30 AM, with LPN #2, she said she did not recall CNA #1 telling her that Resident #4 had refused her shower. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:00 AM, with the DON, she confirmed that she had talked with Resident #4 about her not receiving showers and had thought that the problem was resolved. The DON said the resident did not let her know that she still had not been receiving showers. An interview on 8/16/23 at 1:00 PM, with the Ombudsman, revealed on 8/11/23, Resident #4 had voiced concerns to him about not receiving showers and the resident felt that the staff did not want to get her up for showers because of her weight. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 2/9/23 and she had diagnoses including Paraplegia, Limited mobility, and Morbid Obesity. Record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/21/23 revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 that indicated Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Record review of the TTS Shower Schedule, dated 8/15/23, revealed Resident #4's name was listed on the document which indicated she received showers on TTS. Record review of the facility's Documentation Survey Report, dated August 2023, revealed Resident #4 received one (1) shower on 8/3/23 and received a bed bath on the other scheduled days bath days for August. Record review of the medical record for August 2023 revealed there was no documented refusals of showers for Resident #4. Resident #6 During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:00 AM, the sister of Resident #6 stated that the facility does not give the resident showers on his shower days. She explained that she had complained to the Administrator, the DON and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) that her brother had a strong body odor and the roommate had reported to her that the facility did not give him showers. She felt as if he did not get showers because he had confusion and was unable to speak for himself. In an interview with the roommate, Resident #7, on 8/16/23 at 10:15 AM, he stated that Resident #6 did not get a shower most of the time because he was confused and had a hard time expressing himself. Resident #7 said the CNAs came into the room and talked Resident #6 into getting a bed bath instead of a shower and he felt like they did this because they did not want to get him up. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/09/23 revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 14 that indicated Resident #7 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:30 AM, with the DON, she explained that she when she first came to the facility a year ago, she had changed the bath schedules so that most of the showers would be given on day shift. She stated that the nurses assign the showers to the CNAs. She confirmed that Resident #6 was scheduled for showers on TTS and stated that if a resident refuses a shower, the CNA should document the refusal and notify the nurse. She further explained that the nurse should also document the refusal in the resident's chart. The DON confirmed there were no refusals documented for Resident #6 by either CNAs or the Nurses for the month of August. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 11:15 AM, with CNA #1, she confirmed that Resident #6 did not get a shower on 8/15/23 and that she gave the resident a complete bed bath. CNA #1 said she had only been working at the facility for two (2) weeks and had been told that Resident #6 received bed baths because he did not like to get up. CNA #1 explained that Resident #6 had said that he did not want to get up for a shower. CNA #1 confirmed she did not document the resident's refusal but stated that she did inform LPN #1 and LPN #2 of the refusal. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 6:30 PM, with Resident #6's brother, he stated he was at the facility on 8/15/23 at 3:00 PM to cut his brothers hair but was told his brother did not want to get up. He was not told that Resident #6 had refused a shower and he would have encouraged him to get his shower while he was there, because he knew his brother enjoyed showers. During an interview on 8/17/23 at 8:00 AM, with LPN #1, she stated that she was not aware that Resident #6 had refused a shower and therefore, did not document a refusal. During an interview on 8/17/23 at 8:30 AM, with LPN #2, she said CNA #1 did not tell her that Resident #6 had refused a shower and that is why she did not document it in a nurses note. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 9/7/21 with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis and Quadriplegia. Record review of the Annual MDS with an ARD of 08/08/23 revealed Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. Record review of the TTS Shower Schedule, dated 8/15/23, revealed Resident #6's name was listed on the document which indicated he received showers on TTS. Record review of the facility's Documentation Survey Report, dated August 2023, revealed Resident #6 received one (1) shower on 8/3/23 and received a bed bath on the other scheduled bath days for August. Record review of the medical record for August 2023 revealed there was no documented refusals of showers for Resident #6.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pests for six (6) of seven (7) sampled residents interviewed for pests. Resident #1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pests for six (6) of seven (7) sampled residents interviewed for pests. Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #7. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Pest Control Policy, reviewed 4/10/23, revealed, .Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents .6. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Resident # 1 During an interview on 8/15/23 at 10:00 AM, with Resident #1, revealed he had seen several ants and spiders in his room and had reported it to the maintenance department and to the Administrator. The resident said he was moved into another room until the maintenance department sprayed and cleaned his room. Resident #1 also said they moved him back in his room after two (2) days. Resident #1 stated that there had been a large hole in his wall near the air-conditioning unit and that ants and spiders could be coming through the hole, but maintenance had repaired the hole. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 7/22/2019 with a diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/15/23 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 that indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Resident #2 During an interview on 8/15/23 at 10:15 AM, with Resident #2, she stated there had been ants and black spiders in her room and she was afraid of spiders. The resident also complained about a hole in the wall near the air condition that had been repaired. Resident #2 said the facility had found snakes in the ceiling and they could have come through the hole in the wall. The staff thoroughly cleaned the room and the facility had moved her out of her room for two days. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident # 2 on 12/8/21, with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/07/23 revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 14 that indicated Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Resident #3 During an interview with Resident #3, she said she had seen ants and spiders in her room and was moved to another room. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 7/27/23 with a diagnosis of Strain of Left Quadriceps Muscle, Fascia, and Tendon. A record review of the admission MDS with an ARD of 08/02/23 revealed Resident #3 BIMS score of 13 that indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Resident #4 In an interview on 8/14/23 at 8:45 PM, with Resident #4, she said that she had seen ants and spiders in her room and that she had reported the pests to the nursing staff several times. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 2/9/23 and she had diagnoses including Paraplegia, Limited mobility, and Morbid Obesity. Record review of the Annual MDS with an ARD of 06/21/23 revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 14 that indicated Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 During an interview on 8/15/23 at 11:00 AM, with Resident #5, she said she had had ants and black spiders in her room and that she was afraid of spiders. Resident #5 reported that she was told by another resident that the facility had snakes. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 4/4/21 and she had diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/08/23 revealed Resident #5 had a BIMS of 12 that indicated Resident #5 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #7 During an interview on 8/16/23 at 10:15 AM, with Resident #7, he said he had seen ants and spiders in his room, and he had reported it to the nursing staff. He also stated that he had not seen a pest control provider in the building and alleged that the facility had not sprayed or done anything to get rid of the pest. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #7 on 10/14/22 with a diagnosis of Heart Failure. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/09/23 revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 14 that indicated Resident #7 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 8/14/23 at 9:15 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)#3, she explained that she works all shifts and had been told by several residents that ants were in the rooms. She said that she had seen ants on the floor in resident's rooms and in the hallway but denied seeing spiders or snakes. She had been told by the maintenance department that they found dead snakes in the ceiling. During an interview on 8/14/23 at 09:30 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) # 2, she confirmed that she had seen spiders and ants in the hallway on the west wing, but she had not seen snakes. She stated she told the nurse about the spiders and ants and the nurse had reported it to the maintenance director. An interview on 8/14/23 at 09:45 PM, with CNA #3 revealed she had seen ants and spiders in the resident's rooms and in the hallway and had reported the sightings to the nurses several times. She also stated that the ants and spiders come out at night when its dark, but she had not seen any snakes in the building. An interview on 8/15/23 at 09:00 AM, with the Activity Director (AD) confirmed the residents had voiced concerns about ants, spiders, and snakes in the building and was asking for more pest control visits. The AD said those concerns were taken to the Administrator. On 8/15/23 at 09:15 AM, in an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), he stated that he treated ant mounds outside by putting ant killer on the mounds. He confirmed that he had been advised by several staff members and residents that there were ants and spiders in the building. He explained that he had seen ants, and spiders in the building and there were a few small water snakes spotted in the ceiling. The MD said he was told by the Administrator that exterminators come into the facility monthly to spray the building and he would call them back out to treat the ants, spiders, and snakes. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 10:00 AM, with Technician #1, he explained that has come out to the facility several times in the last six (6) months but had not come out for August 2023 because another technician had come out this month. Technician #1 said he inspected the facility looking for evidence of pests and checking the stations that are set up outside and in non-residential areas. He said he had not been told there was a concern related to ants or spiders. When the technicians arrive to the facility, they report to the Administrator and ask if the facility has any concerns. Technician #1 said that the Administrator had advised that there was a problem with snakes coming into the building and he advised the Administrator that the pest control services does not include snakes. He advised that pest control services would use spider boards in resident rooms to catch spiders. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 10:15 AM, with Technician #2, he confirmed that he provided pest control service to the facility on 8/14/23. He stated that he went to the Administrators office and asked if the facility has any concerns, and the Administrator did not express any concerns related to ants or spiders. He said that the Administrator commented that the facility was having problems with snakes, and he explained to the Administrator that the pest control company does not treat snakes. Technician #2 advised that while on his way out of the building, a staff member in the front office advised that she had spiders coming through her window and he placed glue boards by the window to catch the spiders. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 11:00 AM, with the Administrator, he confirmed the facility had problems with ants, spiders, and water snakes and was unable to recall when he was first notified of the pests. The Administrator stated that the facility had a pest control company that comes to the facility monthly and that he thought the technicians automatically sprayed the building for the pests. The Administrator said he did not realize he had to let the Technicians know he was having a problem with ants and spiders. The Administrator also confirmed the Technicians had advised him that their company does not handle snakes and the Maintenance Director from the Corporate Office was trying to find someone to treat the facility for the snakes. Record review of the facility's, Resident Council minutes, dated 4/27/23, and 5/31/23 revealed the resident's voiced concerns about spiders, bugs, reptiles. Record review of the facility's, Pest Control Service Agreement, (undated), revealed, .1. Service (Proper Name of Pest Control Provider) agrees to provide Pest Control Service* for control of the following pest: Roaches, Ants** and Silverfish, Rats and Mice, FIRE ANTS .6. Customer Cooperation .The customer is responsible for communicating with all persons in the premises about the treatment and the nature of services offered .Standards of Performance for (Proper Name of Facility Corporation) .2. General Requirements .D. (Proper Name of Pest Control Provider) will provide services to your property a minimum of one time per month .4. Insect Control A. Patient Rooms .technician will inspect and/or treat patient rooms at the frequency specified on the service schedule. As a precaution, no treatments involving the use of pesticides will be rendered to patient areas until all patients have been removed .
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comforta...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for four (4) of nine (9) resident rooms and one (1) of five (5) common areas. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Housekeeping dated April 13, 2021, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility that nursing services personnel perform routine housekeeping functions related to nursing care .1. Nursing services personnel are required to perform minor housekeeping services as a matter of routine nursing care. 2. The housekeeping department will perform routine and daily cleaning services . Resident #3 On 4/06/23 at 12:05 PM, an observation of Resident #3's room and interview with Resident #3 revealed the floor had the appearance of being dirty and stained. A four and a half (4 ½) foot wide by three and a half (3 ½) inches high section of the wall below the air conditioner was crumbling with the mesh component of the wall visible. The wall to the left of the air conditioner (when facing the window which was above the air conditioner unit) was scarred and stained by brownish streaks approximately the width of a writing pen that originated approximately four (4) feet above the floor and terminated at the floor. The silver, metal bases of the over the bed table for Resident #3 was covered with a rust-colored substance with abrasive consistency. The door to the room was open and the lower half of the outside of the door, visible from the hallway and the room, had brownish streaks on it; there were three (3) separate brownish streaks on the bottom half of the door, about the width of a writing pen, which branched out to nine (9) thinner streaks, about the width of pencil lead and went to the bottom of the door. Resident #3 was seated in his wheelchair which had a coating of gray substance with a dusty consistency, and which wiped off with a paper towel and tap water that covered the base of the wheelchair and the wheel lock mechanism and was visible on the spokes of the wheelchair wheels. Resident #3 stated he was not aware of who was responsible for cleaning the wheelchairs and that the condition of the over-the-bed table bothered him. On 4/06/23 at 12:15 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed he had been aware of the damaged wall beneath the air conditioner in Resident 3's room for one month. He stated he had contacted a contractor for a quote to fix the damaged wall but was not sure when it would be fixed. He stated he felt it needed to be repaired as quickly as possible. He stated that he was not aware of the condition of the over-the-bed table of Resident #3 but that it needed to be replaced because the base was rusty. He said that the 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) were responsible for cleaning the residents' wheelchairs. He described Resident #3's wheelchair as dusty and confirmed that it needed to be cleaned. He reported that the floors appeared unclean because the facility did not have a working floor machine. On 4/06/23 at 1:50 PM, observation revealed Housekeeper #1 emptying trash can in resident's room. She stated she dusted, swept, mopped and got out the trash and cleaned the bathroom for each room in an assigned block of rooms. She stated she had cleaned the room earlier on 4/06/23. She had no comment regarding the wall, floor, or the door. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/23 revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #6 On 4/06/23 at 1:15 PM, in an interview with Resident #6 and observation in the resident's room and adjoining bathroom revealed an unlabeled, uncovered, mustard yellow bedpan with seven (7) separate areas on the seat, sides and bottom of a dried dark brown substance laying on the floor next to the toilet in the resident's bathroom. During the interview, Resident #6 confirmed that she used a bedpan. Resident #6 complained about the condition of the over bed table with a silver, metal base covered by a rust-colored abrasive substance and a missing saucer sized area of the laminate on the top of the table. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD 3/08/23 revealed Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Resident #10 On 4/06/23 at 1:50 PM, observations and an interview with Resident #10 in the resident's room revealed a three and a half (3 ½) foot long section of wall beneath the air conditioner unit below the window where the base board was laying over on the floor and revealed crumbling wall there was caulking which the resident reported they had applied because they stated they were afraid of bugs and snakes and frogs getting in. The resident stated they swept the floor of their room because they were dissatisfied with the housekeeping provided by the facility staff. The resident could not recall how long the baseboard had been down or the wall had holes in in or the wall had been in a state of crumbling. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD 3/17/23 revealed Resident #10 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #1 On 4/06/23 at 5:00 PM, observations and an interview with the Administrator in the room of Resident #1 revealed spiderwebs, spider egg sacks, the size of the cotton tip of a cotton swab and an approximately one-inch-long dehydrated dead frog noted in corner of Resident #1's room. The Administrator simply stated I will get someone in there to clean that up right away. It looks like we need to call the pest control company. He confirmed the presence of the dead frog and spider egg sacs the corner, approximately four (4) feet from the head of the bed of Resident #1 indicated that the floor had not been cleaned in recent days. In the bathroom for Resident #1, which connected to Resident #9's room there were three wet, unlabeled, sour-smelling bath basins on the floor next to the toilet stacked together. The Administrator confirmed the basins were wet and smelled sour and should not be stacked together wet, unlabeled, or sitting on the floor. He threw them into the trash and indicated there was no way to know which resident they belonged to out of the three residents who shared the bathroom. On 4/07/23 at 10:54 AM, in a telephone interview with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1 revealed that the residents deserved a clean environment and that he was not impressed with the facility housekeeping or cleanliness. He stated that he had not complained because sometimes it would get a little better, and then the next visit it would be lacking again, back and forth. Record review of the Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 3/07/23, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Dining Room On 4/07/23 at 10:00 AM, observations and an interview with the Housekeeping Manager revealed the housekeepers were responsible for cleaning blocks of rooms or rooms on an assigned hall. She stated the housekeepers were responsible for emptying the trash, dusting surfaces, sweeping, and mopping the floors and cleaning the bathrooms. She stated that she and the housekeepers also cleaned the hallways and common areas including the dining room. She stated that she was responsible for supervision of housekeeping and facility cleanliness; she said she accomplished this by visual observations. She said she had not had any complaints about housekeeping. Observation revealed a streak-stained wall in the dining room at the coffee service table and a torn and stained tablecloth on the coffee service table. The wall between the door into the dishwashing room to the far-right of the dirty tray/dish return window had multiple brown streaks from approximately five (5) feet high down to the floor. The Housekeeping Manager stated it was the responsibility of the housekeeping staff to clean walls streaked with unidentified food or beverage splashes/splatter. She stated That needs cleaning. We should have cleaned that. It's there because we aren't wiping down the wall as we should. Regarding thick black sticky substance on the floor at the entrance into the dining room, the housekeeping manager stated that she had located scrappers and made them available to the housekeeping staff and provided in-service training on the use of the scrappers and said that the housekeeping staff should have noticed the substance and cleaned it. The Housekeeping Supervisor confirmed that there were multiple dead fruit flies, one dead house fly and one dead horsefly in the windowsill of the dining room. She stated that the housekeepers were to dust the windowsills daily and stated that it appeared to her that they had not been dusted/cleaned for several days. She confirmed that there should not be dead insects left in the windowsills of the dining room where residents ate meals. She confirmed that the housekeepers should check the corners and sweep and mop the entire room for each block of their assigned resident rooms. She confirmed there should not be spider webs, dust, grime, or dead insects on the floors, including in the corners, of the resident's rooms. She stated that housekeeping staff should clean each room and clean/remove those if present. The Housekeeping Manager said she provided in-service training to the housekeeping staff on 3/30/23 on the upkeep of floors and cleaning of windowsills. On 4/06/23 at 2:00 PM, an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor, he confirmed he used a work order system for staff to report problems or areas of concern. He stated the facility had ordered supplies and materials for repairs in the facility and that paint for walls, molding, doors, etc. had to be ordered by the corporate office and said he had notified the corporate office that he needed paint but had not received any. He confirmed that he was awaiting communication with a contractor for repair of resident walls which were deteriorated and crumbling. He confirmed that he had been aware of the disintegration of the walls of some of the rooms for approximately a month (since 3/06/23) and reported that a contractor had visited the facility and looked at the damaged walls on 3/17/23. On 4/06/23 at 5:10 PM, an interview with CNA #3 revealed each resident's bath basin should be labeled with their name, cleaned, and dried following use and stored in a plastic bag in the resident's closet or bedside table. She confirmed there was no way to know which basin belonged to which of the three residents who shared the bathroom. She confirmed the CNAs were responsible for cleaning, drying, and storing the basins correctly following use. Record review of facility In-service training titled Upkeep and Maintenance of Floors dated 3/30/23 with attached sign-in sheet revealed housekeeping staff were instructed on upkeep and maintenance of the floors throughout the facility .as well as the dusting of the windowsills.
Jun 2022 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for a resident admitted to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for a resident admitted to hospice services for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for hospice services. (Resident #45) Findings include: A record review of a letter provided by the Administrator revealed, It is the policy of this facility to follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual for MDS transmission purposes. A record review of the RAI Manual Version 3.0 revealed . Significant Change in Status Assessment . must be completed within 14 days after the determination that the criteria are met for a Significant Change in Status Assessment. If a nursing home resident elects the hospice benefit, the nursing home is required to complete an MDS Significant Change in Status Assessment. On 06/28/2022 at 9:30 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #45's daughter, she explained her mother was admitted to hospice services on 04/04/2022. Record review of Resident #45's Order Review History Report dated 05/30/2022 through 06/30/2022 revealed a Physician's Order dated 04/04/2022 to Admit to (Proper Name of Hospice Provider). Record review of Resident's #45's MDS assessments revealed there was no SCSA completed within 14 days after she elected the hospice benefit on 04/04/2022. The MDS SCSA with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/08/2022 was more than two (2) months after her admission to hospice services. On 06/28/2022 at 1:45 PM, during an interview with Social Worker #1/Hospice Coordinator, she explained Resident #45 is currently on hospice services On 06/29/2022 at 8:00 AM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, Hospice Nurse, she confirmed Resident #45 has been on hospice services since 04/04/2022 and she visits the resident weekly. On 06/30/2022 at 01:30 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, MDS nurse, she explained a MDS SCSA should be completed within seven days of the resident's change in condition. She confirmed Resident #45 was admitted to hospice services 04/04/2022 and the significant change was just missed. The day the resident went on hospice services should have been the ARD of the SCSA. She uses the RAI manual as a reference when completing MDS assessments. On 06/30/2022 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained a SCSA MDS should be completed when a resident has had a change in condition and the change is recognized. Her expectation of the MDS nurse is to complete the assessments to reflect when a resident has had a significant change. She confirmed Resident #45 was admitted to hospice services on 04/04/2022 and the Significant Change MDS was not completed until 06/08/2022. On 6/30/2022 at 2:20 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, he explained his expectations of the MDS nurse is to complete the assessments when they are due. A record review of Resident #45's admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted her on 10/24/2019 and she has a most recent admission date of 02/23/2022 with diagnoses including Dementia Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Anemia, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan included nursing healthcare information necessary to properly care for a newly a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan included nursing healthcare information necessary to properly care for a newly admitted resident for one (1) of (18) sampled residents. Resident #250. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy Care Plan -Baseline dated June 1, 2000, revealed Policy Statement It is the policy of this facility that an individualized baseline care plan be developed within 48 hours of admission that includes instructions needed to provide effective person center care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care, maintained and/or updated, while a comprehensive care plan is developed . Record review of Resident #250's (Proper Name of Corporation) Baseline Careplan-V3 (Version 3) with an effective date of 06/07/2022 and admission date of 06/07/2022 revealed the Nursing section of the individualized baseline care plan was not completed and did not provide instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care of the resident. Record review of the clinical record revealed there were no nursing comprehensive care plans completed for Resident #250. On 06/29/22 at 01:35 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 who is the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Plan Nurse, she confirmed the nursing section of the baseline care plan was not completed. On 06/30/22 at 10:15 AM, the State Agency (SA) conducted an interview with LPN #2. She stated that each person individually has a section of the baseline care plan that they are responsible for completing. The floor nurse who completes the resident admission is responsible for initiating and completing the nursing section of the baseline care plan. She verified that she is ultimately responsible for making sure that baseline care plans and comprehensive care plans are completed. The care team evaluates the resident's situation, and the baseline and comprehensive care plan gives a better approach to take care of the resident. On 06/30/22 at 10:50 AM, the SA conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview, she confirmed the admitting nurse is responsible for initiating and completing the baseline care plan for a new resident. The MDS nurse is responsible for ensuring the baseline care plan is completed. She stated baseline care plans and comprehensive care plans are needed so that the staff will know how to meet the resident's specific needs. On 06/30/22 at 11:38 AM, the SA conducted an interview with the Administrator. He stated that the MDS Nurse is responsible for baseline and comprehensive care plans and that care plans give the staff a picture of how to treat each newly admitted resident. He commented that It would be a struggle to give the proper care without a baseline or comprehensive care plan. Record review of the Resident #250's admission Record revealed the facility admitted her on 06/07/22 and she had diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy and Unspecified Diastolic (Congestive) heart failure.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three (3) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident # 4, Resident #35, Resident #39) Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Care Plan Committee/Team dated 6/1/2000, revealed, Policy Statement It is the policy of this facility that the Care Planning Committee/Team develops a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident within seven (7) days of completing the resident assessment (MDS) (Minimum Data Set). Care Plan to be completed no later than 21 days after admission .Procedures .3. Care Plan will be modified as needed to reflect residents current status and needs . Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's Progress Notes with the Type listed as admission Summary dated 6/20/22 at 17:16 (5:16 PM), revealed, Patient admitted from (Proper Name of Local Hospital) .stage III (Stage 3) sacral wound with wet to dry dressing CDI (Clean, Dry, Intact) . Record review of Resident #4's Progress Notes with the Type listed as PAR (Problem-Action-Results), dated 6/28/22 at 14:40 (2:40 PM), revealed, PAR RT (Related To) Wounds: Resident readmitted from hospital 6/20/22 with noted unstageable wound to R (Right) heel. Also has Stage 3 to sacrum which is reopened area. Also noted with unstageable to L (Left) heel . Record review of the Resident #4's comprehensive care plans revealed there was no pressure ulcer care plan developed to reflect the resident's current status and needs upon his readmission from the hospital on 6/20/22. A pressure ulcer care plan was developed on 6/28/22 which was eight (8) days after the resident was readmitted to the facility. On 6/30/22 at 10:30 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2/Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan Nurse, she confirmed she had not initiated a pressure ulcer care plan for Resident #4 because she had not been made aware that he had pressure ulcers when he was readmitted on [DATE]. LPN #2 stated the care plan is to guide the staff on what to do to manage the care of the Residents. She stated she has not had time to catch up with the care plans. On 6/30/22 at 11:00 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the care plan nurse failed to develop a pressure ulcer care plan. The DON said the care plan nurse did not know the resident currently had wounds because his previous wounds had healed prior to his hospitalization. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 3/17/2022 with diagnoses including Spina Bifida and Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Resident #35 A record review of Resident #35's Order Summary Report revealed a Physician's Order dated 1/20/2022 for Apixaban Tablet 2.5 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for anticoagulant. A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/26/22 revealed in Section N that Resident #35 received an anticoagulant medication for 7 days of the look back period. A review of Section I revealed that Resident #35 had active diagnoses including Hypertension, COPD and DM. A record review of Resident #35's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed there was no care plan developed to include goals and interventions for the use of an anticoagulant medication as per the MDS completed 5/26/22. There was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed to include goals and interventions for the active diagnoses of Hypertension, COPD, or DM as per the MDS completed 5/26/22. A record revie of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #35 on 12/8/21 with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Essential Primary Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with Hyperglycemia, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Resident #39 A record review of the (Proper Name of Corporate) Baseline Care Plan - V3 (Version 3) with an effective date of 5/20/22 and an admission date of 5/20/22, revealed Resident #39 had a baseline care plan completed. A record review of Resident #39's admission MDS revealed the comprehensive assessment had an ARD of 5/26/22. A record review of Resident #39's comprehensive care plans revealed there were no comprehensive care plans developed after the comprehensive MDS was completed on 5/26/22. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #39 on 5/20/22, with diagnoses including Essential Primary Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus due to Underlying Condition with Diabetic Amyotrophy, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). On 06/29/22 at 1:35 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan Nurse, she stated that care plans are not up to date because she has not had time to complete them. She said that care plans are used by staff to give care to the residents. On 6/30/22 at 10:50 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she stated the MDS nurse is responsible for care plans and care plans are needed so that the staff will know how to meet the residents' specific needs. On 06/30/22 at 11:38 AM, the State Agency (SA) conducted an interview with the Administrator. He stated that the MDS Nurse is responsible for comprehensive care plans. He commented that It would be a struggle to give the proper care without a baseline or comprehensive care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review a facility policy review reveal the facility failed to provide treatment consist...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review a facility policy review reveal the facility failed to provide treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to an existing pressure injury after re-admission to the facility for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #4 Review of the facility's policy, admission and Readmission dated March 15, 2007, revealed, With each admission and readmission the admission Nursing Assessment should be done .The assessments included should be completed on all admission, readmissions .1. admission Nursing Assessment to be completed with each admission and readmission . Findings Include: During an interview on 6/27/22 at 12:56 PM with Resident #4 Mother revealed the resident returned to the facility from the local hospital on 6/20/22. The mother said the resident's pressure wound to the buttocks reopened while he was in the hospital, and she has not seen the wound since he left the hospital. Record review of Resident #4's Progress Notes with the Type listed as admission Summary dated 6/20/22 at 17:16 (5:16 PM), revealed, Patient admitted from (Proper Name of Local Hospital) .stage III (Stage 3) sacral wound with wet to dry dressing CDI (Clean, Dry, Intact) . On 6/29/22 at 10:18 AM, during an observation of wound care and interview with LPN #3 and Registered Nurse (RN) #2, RN #2 said the sacral wound was a stage 4 pressure ulcer, presenting as a stage 3. LPN #4 confirmed the facility was not aware of the sacral wound and they did not have treatment orders in place from the time Resident #4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] until she had called the physician to obtain orders on 6/29/22 when the SA asked to observe wound care. LPN #3 stated she was not the wound nurse when Resident #4 returned from the hospital, and she was not aware at that time that he had any wounds. Record review of Resident #4's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of June 2022, revealed, Dakins (1/4 Strength) Solution 0.125% (Sodium Hypochlorite) Apply to sacral wound topically one time a day every Mon (Monday, Wed (Wednesday), Fri (Friday) for stage 3 pressure wound cleanse with dakins/normal saline, pat dry, pack with collagen, apply xeroform, and over with dry dressing with a start date of 6/29/22. The nurse documented the treatment was administered on 6/29/22. There were no other treatments documented on the TAR prior to the documentation on 6/29/22, which was nine (9) days after Resident #4 was readmitted to the facility. During an interview on 6/29/22 at 1:00 PM with LPN #3 confirmed she was the nurse on duty on 6/20/22. She took the report from the hospital that indicated Resident #4 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacrum and she charted it in the progress notes. LPN #3 said Resident #4 returned to the facility after 5:00 PM, and it was time for her to perform Accuchecks and assist the residents with dinner. LPN #3 confirmed she did not complete a head-to-toe assessment and did not observe or measure the resident's wounds. She reported off to the next shift that Resident #4 was a hospital return and she thought the oncoming nurse would complete the body audit and admission. She did not follow up to make sure the admission was completed when she returned for her next scheduled shift. On 6/29/22 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with LPN #1, she confirmed she was the oncoming nurse on 6/20/22 for the evening shift on the day Resident #4 returned from the hospital. She did not finish the admission and she did not know Resident #4 had wounds because she did not complete a head-to-toe assessment. She thought LPN #2 or LPN #3 would finish the assessment the next day. On 6/30/2022 at 11:00 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed the facility failed to provide wound care treatment to Resident #4's sacral wound for eight (8) days after his re-admission to the facility. She stated LPN #3 was responsible for admitting Resident #4 which should have included assessing the wounds and receiving wound care orders to ensure the treatments were on the TAR. The DON also said LPN #1 should have finished the admission because the resident returned late in the afternoon. The DON was not aware that Resident #4 had wounds when he returned from the hospital and she completed the admission Evaluation and a PAR (Problem-Action-Results) progress note on 6/28/22 for Resident #4. A record review of the facility's admission and re-admission Evaluation V-2 (Version 2) dated 6/20/22 at 17:12 (5:12 PM), revealed .D. Skin Integrity .2. Document any skin concerns .re-opened sacral area, r (right) heel unstageable, l (left) heel. Record review of Resident #4's Progress Notes with the Type listed as PAR, dated 6/28/22 at 14:40 (2:40 PM), revealed, PAR RT (Related To) Wounds: Resident readmitted from hospital 6/20/22 with noted unstageable wound to R (Right) heel. Also has Stage 3 to sacrum which is reopened area. Also noted with unstageable to L (Left) heel . During an interview on 6/30/22 at 11:30 AM, with the Administrator, he confirmed he did not know Resident #4 was readmitted to the facility with pressure wounds. The Administrator said he expected the nursing staff to follow the facility policy on admissions. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #4 on 3/17/2022 with diagnoses including Spina Bifida and Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Record review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/08/22 revealed Resident #4 required a staff assessment for mental status, and he is severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to food items not labele...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to food items not labeled or dated with a Use-By date, and food items not discarded after the expiration date, for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy Labeling and Dating for Safe Storage of Food with an expiration date of 3/6/2020 revealed, Objective: Participants will learn that labeling and dating are critical to promote food safety. The use of Use-By dates will be reviewed. All products should be dated upon receipt. All products should be dated when opened. Use Use-By dates on all food once opened and stored under refrigeration .Expiration dates supercede storage guide . On 6/27/22 at 11:25 AM, the State Agency (SA) conducted an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #1 and observed the following: 1. In the Dry Storage room, there was a container of white bread with a label indicating a preparation date of 6/17/22 and a Use-By date of 6/24/22. 2. In the Dry Storage room, there was a container of wheat bread with a preparation date of 6/17/22 and a Use-By date of 6/24/22. 3. In the Dry Storage room, there was a container of Lemon Juice Reconstitute with an expiration date of 6/14/22. 4. In the Dry Storage room, there was a container of Sweetened Condensed Milk with an expiration date of 3/10/22. 5. In the Dry Storage room, there was a package of Ranch Dressing Mix House Recipe that was opened on the right edge of the package and was not sealed. There was no label indicating the date the package was opened. 6. In the Dry Storage room, there was a package of Ranch Dressing Mix House Recipe that was opened and sealed with a clip. There was no label indicating the date the package was opened. 7. In the Refrigerator, there was a zip lock bag that contained a head of lettuce. There was no label indicating the date the lettuce was stored and there was no Use-By date on the bag. 8. In the Refrigerator, there was a covered bowl of turkey sandwich meat. There was no label indicating the date the turkey was stored and there was no Use-By date on the bowl. 9. In the Refrigerator, there was a covered bowl of ham sandwich meat. There was no label indicating the date the ham was stored and there was no Use-By date on the bowl. On 6/27/22 at 11:52 AM, during an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM), she stated that she and the Assistant DM are responsible for discarding expired foods and ensuring food items are labeld with the opened date and Use-By date. On 6/28/22 at 10:00 AM, during an interview with the DM, she stated that expired food items could cause harm to the residents. She confirmed that food items should be checked daily for expired items and labeling. On 6/30/22 at 02:18 PM, during an interview, the Administrator stated that the residents are at risk for a possible illness if they consume expired food products. He stated that it is very important to check the dates on food and that he does not expect to find expired items in the kitchen. Record review of an Associate In-Service Record, dated 12/14/21, revealed Points Covered/Overview .receiving and storage of food . revealed dietary staff received training on storage of food items.
Jul 2019 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #41 and/or the Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #41 and/or the Resident's Representative (RR), a written notification of a resident's transfer to an acute care facility for one (1) of three (3) resident hospitalizations reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice of Transfer and/or Discharge, dated November 23, 2016, revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide residents , and/or the residents' representatives (sponsors), with a written notice of a transfer or discharge. The facility policy stated this policy applies to transfers or discharges initiated by the facility. The facility policy stated that by definition, transfer or discharge included movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility, whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. Review of an untitled document in Resident #41's medical record documentation, revealed a verbal order dated 4/15/2019. The verbal order was given to the facility by Resident #41's Nurse Practitioner (NP). The telephone order in Resident #41's medical record documentation stated the resident was to be transferred to the hospital related to (R/T) critical labs (platelets). Review of an untitled document in Resident #41's medical record documentation, revealed a telephone order dated 4/27/2019. The telephone order was given to the facility by Resident #41's primary physician. The telephone order in Resident #41's medical record documentation stated the resident was to be transferred to the hospital for rectal bleeding. Review of an untitled document in Resident #41's medical record documentation, revealed a telephone order dated 6/18/2019. The telephone order was given to the facility by Resident #41's primary physician. The telephone order in Resident #41's medical record documentation stated to transfer to the ER (Emergency Room) for rectal bleeding. During an interview, on 7/18/2019 at 11:36 AM, the Administrator revealed the written notice of transfer to an acute care facility for Resident # 41's hospitalizations, were not completed as required. The Administrator stated the staff member responsible had been in-serviced and provided with the correct form and instructions. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident # 41 was admitted by the facility, on 8/14/2017 and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an accurate assessment for a resident with a diagnosis of a mental disorder for one (1) of sixteen (16)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to have an accurate assessment for a resident with a diagnosis of a mental disorder for one (1) of sixteen (16) residents reviewed, Resident #38. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled , Resident Assessment Using the MDS, revised on March 2019, revealed each discipline will use the computerized audit system for their assigned section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to ensure accuracy prior to submission. Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/14/19, revealed under section 15950 Yes was documented for Psychotic disorder and Anxiety under section 15700 for Psychiatric/Mood Disorder. Section A1500 was coded zero (0) which indicated Resident #38 did not have a serious mental illness/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Review of the Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) completed, on 3/6/19, for Resident #38, noted a Level II was not indicated. On 07/17/19 at 3:15 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2)/MDS Coordinator revealed she was not real sure what the guidelines for the PASARR Level II are, but confirmed the resident has a diagnosis which included Delusional Disorder with Paranoia and Histrionic Personality Disorder, and was admitted with these diagnoses, and no Level II was done. LPN #2/MDS Coordinator confirmed the PASARR, dated of 3/6/19, noted a Level II was not indicated, thus was inaccurate. In an interview with the Social Service Director, on 7/17/19 at 3:30 PM, she confirmed Resident #38's PASARR, dated 3/6/19, indicated Resident #38 had a diagnosis of Delusional Disorder with Paranoia and Histrionic Personality Disorder. Review of the Face Sheet revealed facility admitted Resident #38, on 3/4/19, with diagnoses which included Delusional Disorder, Histrionic Personality Disorder, Anxiety, Stage III Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) and Amnesia. Review of the admission MDS, with the ARD of 3/11/19, revealed Resident #38 scored an eight (8) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to do a Level II screening for Resident #38 with a diagnosis of mental disorder, for one (1) of six (6) resident's PASSAR reviews. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to do a Level II screening for Resident #38 with a diagnosis of mental disorder, for one (1) of six (6) resident's PASSAR reviews. Findings include: Record review revealed the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/14/19, for Resident #38 revealed under section 15950 Yes was documented for Psychotic disorder and Anxiety under section 15700 for Psychiatric/Mood Disorder. Section A1500 documented zero (0) which indicated Resident #38 does not have a serious mental illness/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The Level I PASSAR completed, on 3/6/19, noted a Level II was not indicated. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator/ Licensed Practical Nurse #2, on 07/17/19 3:15 PM, she stated she was not real sure what the guidelines for the PASARR Level II are, but confirmed the resident has a diagnosis which included Delusional Disorder with Paranoia and Histrionic Personality Disorder and was admitted with these diagnoses. LPN #2 stated no Level II was done. LPN #2 confirmed the PASARR, with the date of 3/6/19, noted a Level II was not indicated. In an interview, on 7/17/19 at 3:30 PM, the Social Service Director (SSD), confirmed Resident # 38's PASARR, dated 3/6/19, noted that a Level II was not indicated, and the resident had a diagnosis of Delusional Disorder with Paranoia and Histrionic Personality Disorder. The SSD stated she was not sure if it was needed, and confirmed it was not done. Review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #38, on 3/4/19, with the Diagnoses which included Stage III Chronic Kidney Disease, Delusional Disorder, Anxiety, Histrionic Personality Disorder, Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) and Amnesia. Review of the admission MDS, with the ARD of 3/11/19, revealed Resident #38 scored an eight (8) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the Comprehensive Care Plan one (1) of twenty (20) care plans reviewed, for Resident #36. Findings in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the Comprehensive Care Plan one (1) of twenty (20) care plans reviewed, for Resident #36. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, no date, revealed it is the policy of this facility to develop comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing and psychological needs. Record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 7/5/2019, revealed Resident #36 had an indwelling Foley catheter related to Obstructive Uropathy and pressure ulcer to the coccyx. The goal stated Resident #36 will be/remain free from catheter-related trauma. Interventions included: Indwelling Foley catheter care each shift with water and peri wipes. During an observation, on 7/18/19 at 12:21 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provided Resident #36's catheter care. Observations revealed CNA #1 failed to rotate the wipes while providing the catheter care, failed to change the area of the wipe while cleaning the penis, and to secure the tip of catheter to prevent trauma to the meatus as she wiped from the meatus towards the end of the catheter tubing. During an interview, on 07/19/19 at 9:44 AM, CNA #1 confirmed she failed to secure the tubing while cleaning the catheter tubing. CNA # 1 said she thought she rotated the wipes, but she was nervous. During an interview, on 07/19/19 at 9:53 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3/Care Plan Nurse revealed she expected the CNAs to perform catheter care according to the professional standards. A review of the facility's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #36, on 05/14/2019, with diagnoses which included Urinary Tract Infection , Acute Cystitis with Hematuria, Obstructive Uropathy and Pressure Ulcers . A review of Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/25/2019, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident is cognitively impaired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent the possibility of trauma to the urethra and a Urin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent the possibility of trauma to the urethra and a Urinary Tract Infection for one of three (1 of 3) residents reviewed for catheters and catheter care observations, Resident #36 Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated August 25, 2014 revealed the steps in the procedure for male residents included to use a washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse around the meatus. Cleanse the glans using circular strokes from the meatus outward. Change the position of the washcloth with each cleansing stroke. With a clean washcloth, rinse with warm water using the above technique. Return foreskin to normal position. Use clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward. An observation, on 07/18/19 at 12:21 PM, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 provided Resident #36's catheter care. Observations during the catheter care revealed CNA #1 failed to rotate the wipes. CNA #1 failed to change the area of the wipe while cleaning the penis. CNA #1 also failed to secure the tip of the catheter to prevent trauma to the meatus. During an interview, on 07/19/19 at 9:44 AM, (CNA) #1 confirmed she failed to secure the tubing while cleaning the catheter tubing. CNA # 1 said she thought she rotated the wipes, but she was nervous. Record review of the facility's training titled, Post Test Catheter Care, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was trained on catheter care on 6/29/18. Record review of Resident #36's Lab Report, dated 6/25/2019, revealed a Urine Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) report was positive for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Record review of the Physicians Orders revealed an order, dated 7/1/19, for Contact Precautions due to VRE in the Urine During an interview, on 07/19/19 at 9:48 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed CNA #1 should have rotated the wipes while performing Resident #36's catheter care. The DON also said CNA #1 should have secured the tip of the tubing while performing catheter care. The DON said the resident could develop infections when appropriate catheter care is not provided. A review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #36, on 05/14/2019, with diagnoses which included Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria and Pressure Ulcers . A review of Resident #36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/25/2019, revealed Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident is cognitively impaired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent as evidenced by two medication ad...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent as evidenced by two medication administration errors were identified out of 34 medication administration opportunities. The medication error rate was 5.88%. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) failed to administer the correct dose of Sodium Bicarbonate to Resident #197, and Pred Forte eye drops to Resident #29. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated November 1, 2008, revealed for Administration: Medications are administrated in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. Resident #197 An observation during the medication pass, on 7/18/19 at 10:15 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 gave one (1) Sodium Bicarbonate 650 milligram (mg) by mouth to Resident #197. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 7/18/19 at 10:15 AM, after the medication administration for Resident #197, revealed she had finished giving medications to this resident, and was asked what the MAR showed for the Sodium Bicarbonate. LPN #1 confirmed she only gave one (1) tablet and not two (2) per the MAR. LPN #1 stated, I just didn't see that. Review of the Physician Orders for Resident #197 revealed an order, dated 7/17/19, for Sodium Bicarbonate 650 mg two (2) to be given twice a day by mouth. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2019 revealed Resident #197 received Sodium Bicarbonate 650 mg 2 (two) given by mouth twice a day. Resident #29 During the medication pass observation, on 7/18/19 at 10:29 AM, LPN #1 was observed to administer two (2) drops of Pred Forte eye drops into Resident #29's right eye. An interview, with LPN #1 on 7/18/19 at 10:29 AM, confirmed she administered two (2) drops of Pred Forte to Resident #29's right eye, and stated when reviewing the MAR she didn't see that it was one (1) drop instead of two (2). Review of the July 2019 Physician Orders for Resident #29 revealed an order, dated 6/14/19, for Pred Forte one (1) drop to the right eye four (4) times a day. Review of the MAR for Resident #29 revealed Pred Forte for one (1) drop to be given to the right eye four (4) times a day.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide wound care in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of four (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide wound care in a manner to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of four (4) wound care observations, for Resident # 36. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 10/27/17, revealed hand Hygiene is performed to reduce the risk of transmission of infection by appropriate hand hygiene. 5 moments for hand hygiene: Before touching a patient, Before clean/aseptic procedures, After body fluid exposure risk, after touching a patient, and after touching patient surroundings. Observation, on 07/18/19 at 12:39 PM, of wound care provided by Registered Nurse (RN) #2 revealed she left the room to get a tongue blade. On her return to the room, RN #2 failed to wash her hands, and applied gloves RN #2 applied santyl inside the sacral wound with the tongue blade, covered the wound with an abdominal pad and dry dressing. During an interview, on 07/18/19 at 3:42 PM, (RN) #2 confirmed she did not wash her hands when she returned to the room. RN #2 also confirmed Resident #36 did have Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in the wound. RN# 2 said she should have washed her hands to prevent further infection. Record review of the facility's training titled, Medication Administration/Wound Care, dated 2/9/2019, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 was in-serviced on wound care. Record review of the facility's July 2019 Physician Orders revealed an order, dated 7/3/19, for the resident to be on Contact Isolation due to a Methicillin /Resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA) infection in the sacral wound. Record Review of Resident #36 Lab Reports revealed a Wound Culture and Sensitivity (C&S), dated 6/28/2019, Methicillin /Resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA) in the sacral wound. Review of the July 2019 Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 7/16/19 for Vancomycin HCL solution use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in the wound. Record review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #36 has a pressure ulcer and is at risk for pressure ulcer r/t dehydration. Intervention: Administer medications as ordered, administer treatment as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, assess/record/monitor wound healing. measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to Medical Doctor. Observe dressing to ensure it is intact and adhering, report lose dressing to treatment nurse. Observe nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, observe intake and record. During an interview, on 07/18/2019 at 4:00 PM the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed the wound nurse should have washed her hands when she came back into the room. The DON also said this could cause the wound to become infected.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 9 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 1 harm violation(s), $104,874 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 35 deficiencies on record, including 9 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $104,874 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Sunplex Sub-Acute Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Sunplex Sub-Acute Center Staffed?

CMS rates SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Sunplex Sub-Acute Center?

State health inspectors documented 35 deficiencies at SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER during 2019 to 2025. These included: 9 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 25 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Sunplex Sub-Acute Center?

SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 73 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in OCEAN SPRINGS, Mississippi.

How Does Sunplex Sub-Acute Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Sunplex Sub-Acute Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Sunplex Sub-Acute Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Sunplex Sub-Acute Center Stick Around?

SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Sunplex Sub-Acute Center Ever Fined?

SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER has been fined $104,874 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.1x the Mississippi average of $34,128. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Sunplex Sub-Acute Center on Any Federal Watch List?

SUNPLEX SUB-ACUTE CENTER is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.