FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Farmington Presbyterian Manor has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is decent and slightly above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #70 out of 479 nursing homes in Missouri, placing it in the top half of the state, and #3 out of 8 in St. Francois County, meaning only two local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility's performance is worsening, with issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 62%, which is average for Missouri, but they have more registered nurse coverage than 92% of facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. However, the facility has faced some concerning incidents, including a critical issue where a resident got their head stuck between the transfer bar and mattress, and several cases where staff failed to follow physician's orders or address resident grievances, highlighting areas needing improvement despite some strengths in staffing and overall ratings.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Missouri
- #70/479
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $12,649 in fines. Higher than 51% of Missouri facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 51 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Missouri. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
16pts above Missouri avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
14 points above Missouri average of 48%
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for three residents (Resident #7, #9, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for supplemental oxygen therapy and oxygen tubing and humidifier changes for one resident (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the residents by allowi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to or act upon the grievances and dietary recommendations for five residents (Resident #7, #17, #40, #45, and #62) out of 17 sample...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Resident #8 and #60) out of 16 s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan with specific interve...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident #1) safe when the resident got his/her head stuck between the transfer bar attached to the bed fra...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred with safe transfer ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate placement of the indwelling cathet...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $12,649 in fines. Above average for Missouri. Some compliance problems on record.
- • 62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Farmington Presbyterian Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Missouri, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Farmington Presbyterian Manor Staffed?
CMS rates FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 62%, which is 16 percentage points above the Missouri average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Farmington Presbyterian Manor?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Farmington Presbyterian Manor?
FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 90 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 70% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in FARMINGTON, Missouri.
How Does Farmington Presbyterian Manor Compare to Other Missouri Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Missouri, FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (62%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Farmington Presbyterian Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Farmington Presbyterian Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Missouri. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Farmington Presbyterian Manor Stick Around?
Staff turnover at FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR is high. At 62%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Missouri average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Farmington Presbyterian Manor Ever Fined?
FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR has been fined $12,649 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Missouri average of $33,205. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Farmington Presbyterian Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
FARMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.