MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Monroe City Manor Care Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is decent and slightly above average. It ranks #102 out of 479 facilities in Missouri, placing it in the top half, and it is the highest-ranked facility in Marion County among five options. However, the facility is facing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from one in 2020 to five in 2023. Staffing is a strength, with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is well below the state average of 57%. Nonetheless, the facility has received $12,649 in fines, which is average. There are some concerning incidents, including a critical failure to perform CPR on a resident who required it, resulting in the resident's death. Additionally, the facility was cited for not maintaining proper cleanliness in the kitchen and failing to ensure food safety protocols were followed, such as keeping food at the correct temperatures and properly labeling items. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and rankings, the facility has significant areas that need improvement.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Missouri
- #102/479
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Missouri's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $12,649 in fines. Lower than most Missouri facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Missouri. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Missouri average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Missouri avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Nov 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served to meet the nutritional needs of the residents. Staff failed to prepare and serve food according to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of bed frames, mattresses...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary equipment was free of an accumulation of grease, oil, dust and debris, failed to remove damaged food container...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the total hours nursing staff (registered nurse (RN), certified nurse assistant (CNA), certified medication technician (...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, proc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2020
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer temperature was maintained at 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below, failed to ensure food items were ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2019
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin according to the manufacturer's recommendations for one resident (Resident #11), in a review of 15 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident restroom and public restroom exhaust...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 38% turnover. Below Missouri's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 8 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $12,649 in fines. Above average for Missouri. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Monroe City Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Missouri, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Monroe City Manor Staffed?
CMS rates MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Missouri average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Monroe City Manor?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER during 2019 to 2023. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 6 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Monroe City Manor?
MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MONROE CITY, Missouri.
How Does Monroe City Manor Compare to Other Missouri Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Missouri, MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Monroe City Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Monroe City Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Missouri. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Monroe City Manor Stick Around?
MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Missouri nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Monroe City Manor Ever Fined?
MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER has been fined $12,649 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Missouri average of $33,205. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Monroe City Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
MONROE CITY MANOR CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.