CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in both facility-sponsored group and individual activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one resident (Resident #71) who resided at the facility. A sample of 23 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 77.
1. Record review showed the facility did not have an activities policy.
Record review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 3/10/19, showed the following information:
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others was present;
-Did not significantly interfere with the resident's participation in activities or social interactions;
-Did not put others at risk of physical harm, did not intrude on the privacy or activity of others, and did not significantly disrupt care or living environment;
-It is important to resident to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read, listen to music, and participate in religious services or practices;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on unit, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Limited assistance of one staff person for transfers, walk in room and corridor, and eating;
-Total dependence with one staff person assist for dressing and locomotion off unit;
-Diagnoses included dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), and anxiety disorder.
Record review of the resident's March 2019 physician order sheet (POS) showed an order, dated 12/11/18, for activities as tolerated.
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/25/19, showed the following information:
-Stronger Longer recommended for strengthening;
-Encourage resident to become involved with activities especially music or special entertainment;
-Sit with resident and reassure resident that he/she is okay;
-Encourage resident to color in book or turn on music to lower anxiety level;
-Offering snacks and drinks sometimes calms resident also;
-Assist resident to and from activities;
-Provide resident with a monthly calendar.
Record review of the resident's activity logs, dated December 2018, showed the resident did not attend any activities.
Record review of the resident's activity logs, dated January 2019, showed the resident did not attend any activities.
Record review of the resident's activity logs, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not attend any activities.
Observation on 3/26/19, at 9:50 A.M., showed the following:
-Activity Aide (AA) Q came by the nurses' station and invited and assisted residents to Stronger Longer (exercise program), which began at 10:00 A.M.
-The AA did not invite Resident #71 who was seated in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/26/19:
-At 10:00 A.M., Stronger Longer;
-At 2:30 P.M., Art & Music Therapy.
Observation on 3/26/19, at 10:00 A.M., showed Stronger Longer occurred in the main dining room and the resident did not participate. The resident remained seated in his/her wheelchair at the nurses' station.
Observation on 3/26/19, at 2:30 P.M., showed Art & Music Therapy occurred in the activities room and the resident did not participate. The resident remained seated in his/her wheelchair at the nurses' station.
Observation on 3/27/19, from 8:43 A.M. until 11:55 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her wheelchair at the nurses' station with no activity and no one-on-one interaction.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:56 A.M., showed Takeout activity occurred and the resident did not participate. The resident remained seated in his/her wheelchair at the nurses' station.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/27/19:
-Takeout: [NAME] Family Restaurant with no specific time listed;
-At 2:30 P.M., Springtime Jingo.
Observation on 3/28/19, at 2:20 P.M., showed the following:
-Resident was seated in his/her wheelchair in his/her room visiting with a family member;
-Resident is listening to the radio quietly and eating a snack.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/28/19:
-At 9:00 A.M., Popcorn & Movie;
-At 2:30 P.M., Music.
Observation on 3/29/19, at 9:28 A.M., showed the following:
-AA Q came to the nurses' station and invited and assisted residents to Stronger Longer;
-AA Q did not invite Resident #71 to the activity.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/29/19:
-At 10:00 A.M., Stronger Longer;
-At 2:30 P.M., Bingo.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/30/19:
-At 10:00 A.M., Coffee & Chat;
-At 2:30 P.M., Just Saying - Word Game.
Record review of the facility's activity calendar showed the following activities available on 3/31/19:
-At 11:00 A.M., Catholic Mass;
-At 2:30 P.M., Protestant Service.
Record review of the activities' department documentation form, quarterly assessment, dated 3/20/19, showed the following information:
-Resident awake morning, afternoon, and evening with naps for no more than a one hour time period;
-Average time involved in activities: most - more than 2/3 of the time;
-Preferred activity setting is the day/activity room;
-Resident prefers large groups, independent leisure, and small groups;
-Resident prefers program times morning, afternoon, evening, and night;
-Resident's interests included: arts & crafts, walking and wheeling outdoors, talking or conversing;
-Focus of programming included: one-on-one activities, independent activities, relaxation activities, social interaction activities, and talk-oriented activities;
-Activity care plan in place.
Record review of the resident's activity logs, dated March 2019, showed the following information:
-Resident's family member here daily;
-On 3/4/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended the Sing Along and left early;
-On 3/5/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended the Mardi Gras party;
-On 3/16/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended a music event;
-on 3/18/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended the St. Patrick's Day party;
-On 3/25/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended the monthly birthday party;
-On 3/28/19, at 2:30 P.M., resident attended a music event and left early;
-On 3/29/19, with no time, resident had one-on-one activity.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 11:51 A.M., the Activities Director (AD) said the following:
-All residents are able to come to activities;
-The activity director and aide will tell certified nursing aides (CNAs) to remind residents about an activity going on that day;
-Residents who are not physically able to get to the activity will be assisted by the activities department and nursing aides;
-Residents who are cognitively impaired are still allowed to attend activities and staff will assist them;
-When a resident attends an activity it is circled on their calendar and at the end of the month the calendars are scanned into the resident's electronic chart;
-A quarterly assessment is completed to determine if the resident's care plan is being met;
-Resident #71 does not like group activities very much;
-Group activities raise his/her anxiety level and he/she can be disruptive at times;
-The resident likes to be seated at the nurses' station;
-When the resident is seated at the nurses' station or in his/her room staff should be offering coloring books, snacks, and one-on-one for activities for the resident;
-The resident's family visits daily and often the staff will not invite the resident to the activity so that it does not interfere with the visit.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 2:20 P.M., Resident #71's family member said the following:
-The resident is not invited or taken to activities;
-The resident would enjoy attending musical events;
-The resident did attend the Mardi Gras party earlier in the month, but has not attended any other activities that he/she is aware of;
-The resident is supposed to go to Stronger Longer, but the staff do not take the resident;
-The family member feels that the resident would benefit from social activities with other people.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said the following:
-The nurse aides will assist residents to activities;
-He/she has never seen Resident #71 at an activity;
-Resident #71 is usually seated at the nurses' station and family visits daily at lunch time.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:56 A.M., NA G said the following:
-Every resident is supposed to be able to attend activities;
-Nurse aides will assist residents who cannot get there by themselves, including cognitively impaired residents;
-Resident #71 is never asked to attend activities and has not attended any that he/she is aware of;
-Resident #71 does better one-on-one, but the activities department and nursing staff do not do this with the resident;
-Resident #71 usually sits at the nurses' station in either his/her high back wheelchair or recliner.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:03 P.M., Licensed Practical Nure (LPN) E said the following:
-The activities department will check with residents to see who would like to go to an activity;
-If the residents are cognitively impaired then the family will let staff know if the resident should attend activities or not;
-Resident #71 never goes to activities;
-Resident #71's family has never told him/her to take the resident to an activity;
-He/she has never asked the resident's family if staff should take the resident to an activity.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., with the administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the following:
-The activities department goes around to residents and invites them to attend an activity;
-If the resident is physically unable to get to the activity, then staff assist;
-Try to take cognitively impaired residents to activities;
-Posted a calendar outside of the dining room to help the residents know about activities;
-Try to host the activity in the activities room;
-Activities Director documents attendance on the monthly calendar by circling the event;
-A quarterly assessment is completed and one-on-one's are documented there;
-Resident #71 is disruptive during group activities and to other residents;
-Resident #71 likes to color in his/her coloring book in the afternoon;
-Resident #71 had a radio in his/her room; he/she pushed it off the table and will not listen to it.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure narcotics (controlled substances - a drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, or use is regulated by a governme...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure narcotics (controlled substances - a drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, or use is regulated by a government such as prescription medications that are designated by law) were properly accounted for and secured when staff failed to properly document and account for red lock tabs used by the facility to lock and secure narcotics in an E-kit (emergency kit) per facility policy. The facility census was 77.
Record review of the facility's Delivery and Receipt of Routine Deliveries Policy, dated 1/1/13, showed the following:
-Upon delivery by the pharmacy, the facility nurse or other authorized designee on behalf of the facility should perform the following:
-Sign the delivery manifest (record) (may be electronic signature if permitted by applicable law), note the time of arrival, and take responsibility for the receipt, proper storage and distribution of the delivered medications;
-Copies of manifests or packing slips may be retained for reference for a period to be determined by the facility or facility policy;
-After taking delivery, the facility should place medications into the facility's controlled medication inventory system and should store such controlled substances in complaint with applicable law;
-Store refrigerated medications under proper temperature.
1. Record Review of the manufacturer's package insert, dated October 2012, regarding the proper storage of Ativan (name brand for lorazepam, a medication used to treat anxiety) Intensol (liquid form of the medication) showed the medication should be stored at cold temperatures, and to refrigerate at 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit.
Observation of the Hope Unit medication room on 03/28/19, at 2:45 P.M., with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) W, showed the following the refrigerator had a red box for holding narcotics, but had no lock on it nor any medications in it.
Record review of a form titled Narcotic E-Kit Medication Security Lock Register and Removal Log Fridge Lock located in the narcotic log book for the refrigerator showed the following:
-Date of Entry: 3/11/19; Time: 9:35 A.M.; Signature of LPN E and another staff member.
-The number 6264219 was written under the Old Lock number section and the number 6264211 was written beside number 6264209 under the New Lock # section on the same line;
-The number 6261793 was written under the Old Lock # section on the line below the line dated 3/11/19 under the New Lock number section with a signature but no date;
-An arrow was drawn from the number of the Old Lock number section to the New Lock number section on the undated line below it to indicate it was the New Lock Number, and to indicate it was the last number applied to the red narcotic box, however, the box was blank;
-An arrow was also drawn from the blank box on the last line toward the Old Lock number section on the undated line where the number 6261793 was written;
-No more entries were recorded on the form.
During an observation and interview in the Hope Unit Medication room on 3/28/19, at 3:00 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said he/she she signed the narcotic sheet for the refrigerator medications last. The arrows written on sheet were to indicate the red tab numbers for the appropriate sections. The numbers for the orange E-Kit box in the upper cabinet matched, but the red tabs did not match for the refrigerator red narcotic box, and could not be located. The red narcotic E-Kit box in the refrigerator showed no red tab lock on the box nor Ativan Intensol inside. LPN E said he/she would look for the form that showed the last time Ativan Intensol was added to the stock for the refrigerator since he/she could not locate the form during the observation. LPN E said the log (Narcotic E-Kit Medication Security Lock Register and Removal Log) showed the Ativan Intensol was added on 3/11/19.
Observation and interview on 03/28/19, at 3:16 P.M., with the Director of Nursing present in the Hope Unit medication room, showed the following:
-The red narcotic box in the refrigerator had no red lock tabs on it, and the red lock tab numbers indicated as last documented on the form could not be located;
-The red lock tabs were not located in the Hope Unit medication room.
-The DON said only one Ativan Intensol at a time was supposed to be in refrigerator. Staff pull the sheet for the Ativan Intensol when it is removed, and reorder it when it is used.
Record review of forms found in the narcotic log book titled Controlled Substance Emergency Kit Transfer Record/Invoice showed the following:
-A form that showed the following:
-Date of request: 3/11/19; Drug: Ativan Intensol two milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml); One Bottle 30 ml ; Handwritten on upper right corner Fax to pharmacy on 3/11/19 at 7:30 P.M.;
-A form that showed the following:
-Date of Request: 3/17/18: Drug: Ativan Intensol two mg/ml; One bottle 30 ml.
Record review of forms found in the narcotic book titled Controlled Substance Emergency Drug Supply Medication Administration Record, Drug name: Lorazepam (generic name for Ativan); Strength: two mg/ml; Formulation: Intensol;
-Date 3/16/19: Time: 11:00 P.M.; Signed by nurse: Added to Package Inventory Log signed by nurse: Doses Removed: One; New Total: Zero;
-Date: 3/18/19: Time: Midnight; Signed by staff; Added to Package Inventory Log with checkmark by staff; New Total: One;
-Neither of the above entries were recorded on the Narcotic E-Kit Medication Security Lock Register and Removal Log Fridge Lock located in the narcotic log book for the refrigerator.
Record review of the Controlled Substance Emergency Drug Supply Medication Administration Record forms found in the narcotic book for the E-Kit located in the upper cabinet in the Hope Unit medication room showed the following:
-Drug name: Clonazepam (medication to treat anxiety); Strength 0.5 mg; Formulation: Tablet; New total: Ten: No date or signature of a nurse was written on the form to indicate when or by whom the medication was received from the pharmacy and added to the stock of medications;
-Drug name: Lorazepam: Strength: 0.5 mg: Formulation: Tablet: New total: Ten: No date or signature of a nurse was written on the form to indicate when or by whom the medication was received from the pharmacy and added to the stock of medications.
During an observation and interview on 3/28/19, at 3:16 P.M., the DON said the forms for the lorazepam and clonazepam were blank, and she would check the pharmacy logs to see who signed them in. The DON also reviewed the narcotic logs for the Ativan Intensol that was supposed to be in the refrigerator, and she said she could not determine what was meant by all of the tag numbers and arrows written on that form. The Ativan Intensol, was located in the box in the cabinet. The DON said the Ativan should not be in that location. She said the last time it was recorded as delivered was on 3/18/19. She observed the refrigerator and saw the red narcotic E-Kit box had no red tab on it and no Ativan Intensol in it.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:38 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) N said narcotics come in on the evening shift. CMT N signed medications in with the pharmacy, and he/she and the nurse put them in their medication carts. The E-Kits were on Hope Unit. There was a book to log where the new red lock tabs and old red lock tabs were recorded. There had to be a nurse present when the narcotic E-Kits were accessed. Narcotics for the E-Kit were reordered as needed. CMT N administered Ativan Intensol, and it should be kept in the refrigerator.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:50 A.M., LPN F said when staff receive narcotics from the pharmacy, staff put them in the medication carts and add them to the count on the narcotic sheets in the books. LPN F had taken narcotics to the Hope Unit nurse. There was a paper process for handling those. If a nurse removed a narcotic from the E-Kit, there has to be two nurses present, and both signed the narcotic sheet. The nurses should put new red tab locks on the E-Kits. That was important with narcotics. If the nurses didn't follow proper procedure, another nurse could be held accountable if the narcotic count was wrong later. Staff should call a nurse if the count was wrong, or the red tabs didn't match. Liquid Ativan Intensol should be kept in the refrigerator.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 1:43 P.M., LPN E said when nurses obtained narcotics from the E-Kit, they entered them on the white narcotic sheet supplied by the facility. The facility received a yellow sheet from the pharmacy. One nurse signed for them when they arrived. When the narcotic was removed from the E-Kit, the nurses signed the sheet on the bottom, and faxed it to the pharmacy. The red lock tabs should always match the sheets. Staff do not check the red tabs every shift when counting narcotics. Ativan Intensol should be stored in the refrigerator.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 1:30 P.M., the DON said when pharmacy delivers medications, the nurses and CMT's verify the count before accepting them. Narcotics are added to the narcotic count, and added to the narcotic records when we receive them. The narcotics are documented on the white narcotic sheets in the narcotic books. The narcotic sheet arrives with the narcotics when delivered from the pharmacy. We can show where a card of medication is added or subtracted from the counts. This was important with narcotics in order to keep track of them and account for them. If a discrepancy was found, it would be reported to the pharmacy and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). The Ativan Intensol should be stored in the refrigerator. The red lock tabs should always match, and should be visualized and counted every shift. Staff had not been charting those counts. The facility needs to know who is getting into the narcotic boxes. She had not been checking the logs, and now realized there was a problem.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than five percent when staff made two medication errors out of 32 opportunities result...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than five percent when staff made two medication errors out of 32 opportunities resulting in an medication error rate of 6.25%. Facility staff failed to administer Resident #65's insulin per manufacture's guidelines and failed to administer one medication to Resident #2 due to the medication not being available. The facility census was 77.
Record review of the Novolog (brand name for insulin aspart - a fast-acting insulin injected under the skin used for control of blood sugar) insulin manufacturer's insert, showed Novolog starts acting fast. A meal should be eaten within five to ten minutes of taking a dose of Novolog.
Record review of the facility's Insulin Administration Policy, dated 3/27/17, showed the following:
-Check physician's order;
-Compare medication label with Medication Administration Record (MAR);
-Read MAR again and compare with label on the medication.
(The policy did not address timing of insulin administration in relation to meals.)
Record review of the facility's Medication Administration Guidelines Policy, dated March 2015, showed the following:
-It is the purpose of this facility that residents receive their medications on a timely basis and in accordance with established policies;
-A current Physician's Desk Reference (a commercially published compilation of manufacturer's prescribing information on prescription drugs, updated annually) is available at each nurse's station.
1. Record review of Resident # 65's face sheet (general resident information) showed the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar).
Record review of the resident's current physicians' orders for March 2019 showed the following:
-An order dated 11/18/18, for Novolog Insulin 100 units/milliliter per sliding scale (dose range dependent upon blood sugar results) with meals (11:30 A.M.);
-If blood sugar is 161 to 200 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL), give five units of Novlog subcutaneously (SC) (injected under the skin).
Record review of the resident's March 2019 MAR showed the Novolog insulin was to be administered with meals.
During an observation on 3/28/19, at 11:27 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E administered five units of Novolog insulin SC into the resident's lower right abdomen at 11:27 A.M.
During an observation on 3/28/19, at 12:02 P.M., staff served a lunch tray to the resident (35 minutes after the insulin administration).
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:50 A.M., LPN F said when he/she administered short-acting insulins, he/she administered them within 30 minutes to one hour before a meal. If the blood sugar was below 100 mg/dL, he/she would hold them until after they had eaten.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 1:43 P.M., LPN E said the resident should eat within 30 minutes to an hour after the fast-acting insulins have been administered to residents.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 1:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said fast-acting insulins such as Novolog should be administered as soon as possible in regards to meals. When food trays are passed, the insulin should be administered within 15 minutes of when the meal is eaten, or if a resident that may have a habit of not eating, would wait to see if they had eaten first, then administer the insulin during the meal. The facility had no specific policy regarding the timing of insulins with meals. She expected staff to be aware of how to administer fast-acting insulins.
2. Record review of Resident # 2's face sheet showed a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder.
Record review of the resident's current physicians' orders for March 2019, showed the following:
-An order dated 11/14/18, for buspirone (a medication used to treat anxiety) tablet, five milligrams, twice a day at 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M.
Record review of the resident's March MAR showed the Buspar (buspirone) medication had been circled (indicating not administered) since 3/15/19 for both doses due at 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M.
During an observation and interview on 3/29/19, at 7:52 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) N passed medications to the resident. CMT N did not administer an ordered dose of buspirone due at that time. CMT N said the resident had been out of the medication since the 15th of that month. CMT N said the DON was supposed to get a form filled out for the facility to replace the medication at their cost.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:38 A.M., CMT N said normally it could take until the next day to receive medications after they ran out of them. The facility should have had them available sooner than 15 days. CMT N was not aware if the physician had been notified or not about the resident's Buspar not being available. CMT N had reported to the nurse the first time when it had been missing around the 15th, and had faxed the information to pharmacy. Last week, when he/she worked on Friday, he/she had noticed it still had not arrived, and reported to the nurse, LPN F .
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:50 A.M., LPN F said the following:
-When he/she administered short-acting insulins, he/she administered them within 30 minutes to one hour before a meal. If the blood sugar was below 100, he/she would hold them until after they had eaten. LPN F would expect medications to be replaced within a day or two of being ordered. As for Resident # 2, LPN F was aware of his/her Buspar missing last week, and that was the first time he/she was aware of it. The pharmacy said they had sent it, and someone had signed for it. We searched for it and couldn't find it. Pharmacy said they would fax a paper to the facility to fill out in order to pay for it. This was last Friday or Saturday. We let the DON know. CMT N told LPN F about the Buspar missing. That was the last I heard about the Buspar missing. No one told me again until yesterday and today, and I told the DON again. Fifteen days was a long time to go without a medication, but Resident # 2 is on so many medications anyway, and gets sleepy. The DON told the Nurse Practitioner today, and she discontinued the Buspar today.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:50 A.M., LPN F said he/she would expect medications to be replaced within a day or two of being ordered. He/she was aware the resident's Buspar was missing last week, and that was the first time he/she was aware of it. The pharmacy said they had sent it, and someone had signed for it. Staff searched for it and could not find it. Pharmacy said they would fax a paper to the facility to fill out in order to pay for it. CMT N told LPN F about the Buspar missing. Fifteen days was a long time to go without a medication, but the resident is on many medications and gets sleepy.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 1:43 P.M., LPN E said if the facility ran out of a medication, they would call the pharmacy and see when it was to be delivered. If it wasn't delivered, it could be a problem with insurance or due to waiting on the physician to write the e-script or to sign it. If there was a problem with the insurance, the pharmacy faxes a form for the DON to fill out so that the medication can be paid for by the facility. Deliveries are usually at 2:00 P.M. and 10:00 P.M. He/she would expect the medication to be replaced within eight hours, and two hours for stat (emergency) medications. LPN E would let the DON know if he/she was having trouble getting a medication.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 3:15 P.M., the DON said today was the first time she had heard the resident was not getting his/her Buspar.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 1:30 P.M., the DON said typically the process for when a resident runs out of medications is for the CMT's to call the pharmacy and the nurse. The nurse reorders the medication. If the medication is not here by the next delivery, the nurse calls the pharmacy again. Her investigation of the incident showed the medication had been delivered on 3/12/19 by pharmacy according to the manifest (a term used by nursing staff to describe a list of medications). The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said she remembered putting it in the medication cart. The nurses should have notified the physician that the medications were being missed. The CMT must notify the nurse, who is to notify the physician and the responsible party. She would expect staff to fill out an incident report documented as a medication error of omission. If insurance doesn't cover a medication or it is too early to refill, pharmacy will send a form for us to fill out. The pharmacy did not send the DON a form for the resident's Buspar.
MO00154201
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infection causing cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infection causing contaminants when staff failed to use appropriate hand hygiene during toileting assistance and incontinent care for one resident (Resident #71) in a sample of 23 residents. The facility's census was 77.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing, dated March 2015, showed the following:
-The purpose is to reduce transmission of organisms from resident to resident, nursing staff to resident, and resident to nursing staff;
-Use soap, comfortably hot water, and disposable hand towel;
-Turn on water and adjust temperature;
-Soap hands well;
-Use brush to clean under nails as necessary;
-Rinse with hands lowered to allow soiled water to drain directly into sinks;
-Do not allow hands to touch sink;
-Use disposable hand towel to turn off faucet and dry hands well, especially between fingers.
1. Record review of Resident #71's face sheet (brief information sheet) showed the following information:
-admission date of 12/11/18;
-Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), anxiety disorder due to know physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), dementia without behavioral disturbance (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance.
Record review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/10/19, showed the following information:
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:31 A.M., showed the following:
-Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B and Nurse Aide (NA) J wheeled the resident in his/her wheelchair into the shower room to go to the bathroom;
-CNA B and NA J did not wash their hands, and put on gloves;
-The staff positioned the resident for transfer and completed the transfer to the toilet;
-CNA B told the resident that he/she was going to wipe the resident;
-The staff transferred the resident back to his/her wheelchair;
-NA J removed his/her gloves and left the shower room without washing his/her hands;
-While still wearing the same contaminated gloves, CNA B wheeled the resident over to the sink and adjusted the resident's shirt and hair;
-CNA B turned on the water for the resident to wash his/her hands;
-CNA B removed his/her gloves and dried the resident's hands with a paper towel;
-CNA B did not wash his/her hands before he/she wheeled the resident back out to the nurses' station area and covered the resident with a blanket;
-CNA B left to answer another randomly observed resident's call light, entered the room, and did not wash his/her hands before putting on a new pair of gloves to perform resident care.
Observation on 3/28/19, at 3:37 P.M., showed the following:
-NA O and NA P assisted the resident to his/her room to use the toilet;
-NA O and NA P did not wash their hands before donning gloves;
-NA O and NA P assisted the resident to walk to the bathroom;
-The surveyor heard the resident urinate;
-NA O told the resident he/she was going to wipe him/her;
-NA O and NA P assisted the resident to walk back to his/her bed and laid him/her down;
-NA P removed his/her gloves, did not wash his/her hands, and left the room to answer another resident's call light;
-NA O removed his/her gloves, did not wash his/her hands, covered the resident with blankets and removed the resident's glasses from his/her face, placing them on the table.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 4:03 P.M., NA O said:
-Hands are to be washed prior to putting on gloves;
-Gloves are to be removed, hands washed, and a new pair of gloves put on after any toileting;
-Staff should never use the same pair of gloves, without washing hands, and then touch a resident's face or perform another care for the resident.
Observation on 4/1/19, at 2:00 P.M., showed CNA A and NA L washed their hands and donned gloves. The aides positioned the resident on the bed and removed his/her pants and wet brief. CNA A used pre-moistened wipes to clean the resident's front peri area. The aides turned the resident to his/her left side. Without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, CNA A used wipes to clean the buttocks and coccyx area. Staff noted a small (pea-sized) open area to the left buttock, and the coccyx area was very reddened. Using the same contaminated gloves, CNA A applied barrier cream to the entire buttocks and coccyx areas, including the open area. The aides removed their gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, and dressed the resident in a clean brief and his/her pants.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 9:32 A.M., CNA B said:
-Wash hands before putting on gloves;
-Toilet or complete pericare on the resident, remove gloves, wash hands, and put on a new pair of gloves;
-Finish resident care;
-Remove gloves and wash hands prior to exiting the room.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said:
-Wash hands and put on gloves before performing any care on a resident, including pericare or toileting;
-Once pericare or toileting is completed, wash hands, put on new gloves, and assist the resident with anything else;
-Remove the gloves and wash hands before exiting the room.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:06 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said staff should do the following:
-Wash their hands before putting on a pair of gloves;
-Assist a resident with toileting and remove gloves, wash hands, and put on a new pair of gloves;
-Complete any other needed care;
-Remove gloves and wash hands before exiting the room.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said staff should wash or sanitize their hands with glove changes, which should be done between care on different body parts of a resident and prior to applying barrier cream.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with respect and digni...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with respect and dignity when staff stood over one resident (Resident #19) while assisting the resident to eat; when staff interacted with each other while without interacting with the resident two residents (Resident #19 and #72) with meals; when staff spoke inappropriately in front of four residents (Resident #8, #19, #48, and #53) by using curse words and discussing medical related information; and staff spoke inappropriately to one resident (Resident #71) during personal care. A sample of 23 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 77.
1. Record review of Resident #72's medical chart showed the following information:
-admitted to the facility on [DATE];
-Cognitively intact;
-Required extensive assistance by two staff for bed mobility and transfers.
During an interview on 3/25/19, at 10:42 A.M., the resident said staff that are assisting with his/her cares sometimes forget he/she is there. They carry on a conversation between themselves about things having nothing to do with the resident or of interest to him/her.
2. Record review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff, showed the following information:
-Original admission date of 1/12/07;
-Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia (difficulty speaking), hemiplegia (condition that causes paralysis of one side of the body), seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression;
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, personal hygiene, and eating.
Record review of Resident #53's quarterly MDS showed the following information:
-Original admission date of 2/7/19;
-Diagnoses included diabetes and Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement);
-Moderately cognitively impaired;
-Supervision for transfers;
-Limited assistance with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Independent with eating.
Observation on 3/25/19, at 12:23 P.M., showed the following:
-Resident #19 was seated at the table in the dining room in his/her high back wheelchair with a clothing protector on;
-Resident #53 was seated at the table in the dining room across from Resident #19 in his/her wheelchair;
-Nurse Aide (NA) G set up Resident #19's meal on the table in front of him;
-Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F stood beside Resident #19's wheelchair;
-NA G and CNA A were standing between Resident #19's and Resident #53's tables;
-LPN F said Resident #19 is pissed off because he/she had his/her face washed and didn't want it done;
-NA G, CNA A, and LPN F smiled and LPN F laughed;
-Resident #19's face was set in a frown with a furrowed brow and his/her mouth turned down at the corners and looked at LPN F while frowning;
-LPN F looked at Resident #19 and again said he/she is just pissed off;
-Resident #53 heard the conversation;
-LPN F sat down on the stool beside Resident #19 with his/her body turned away from the resident and began to scoop up food with a spoon and push it at his/her face without speaking to the resident;
-Resident #19 opened his/her mouth and took the bite of food;
-LPN F never looked at or spoke to Resident #19 and continued to push food at his/her face on the spoon;
-Resident #19 would take two-three bites and then would close his/her mouth into a tight line and shake his/her head;
-LPN F did not acknowledge the resident doing this and would lay the spoon against his/her lips until he/she would take the bite of food;
-While assisting the resident to eat, LPN F had a conversation regarding another resident which included his/her care, doctor's orders for medications, and his/her diagnoses;
-This pattern continued until the resident had completed his/her meal.
Observation on 3/29/19, at 12:31 P.M., showed the following:
-Resident #19 was seated at the table in the dining room in his/her high back wheelchair with a clothing protector on;
-The resident's food had been set up on the table in front of him/her and no one was assisting the resident to eat;
-Resident #53 was in his wheelchair and seated at the next table facing Resident #19;
-LPN I stood beside Resident #19 and began to feed the resident;
-LPN F entered the dining room and walked over the LPN I and leaned against the back of Resident #19's wheelchair and began a conversation with LPN I;
-LPN F and LPN I had a conversation for about two minutes with LPN F leaning against the resident's chair and talking loudly over his head to LPN I;
-LPN I continued to stand beside the resident's wheelchair and feed him/her and did not speak to the resident or make eye contact with the resident;
-Resident #53 witnessed the entire situation.
3. Record review of Resident #71's quarterly MDS showed the following information:
-admission date of 12/11/18;
-Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness;
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance with toileting and personal hygiene;
-Limited assistance with transfers.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:31 A.M., showed the following:
-CNA B and CNA J assisted the resident to the bathroom;
-CNA J asked the resident if he/she needed to have a bowel movement and the resident said yes;
-CNA J said the resident needs to hurry up and go to the bathroom because he/she has to go too and can't wait for the resident if the resident is going to take a long time;
-The resident urinated and did not attempt to have a bowel movement.
4. Record review of Resident #48's quarterly MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, showed the following information:
-admission date of 1/24/19;
-Diagnoses included high blood pressure, pressure ulcer to right heel, and dementia;
-Moderately cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance with dressing, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Independent with eating.
Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS showed the following information:
-admission date of 12/22/17;
-Diagnoses included high blood pressure, history of urinary tract infections, aphasia, hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body), anxiety disorder, and depression;
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance with transfers, toileting, personal hygiene, and dressing;
-Limited assistance with eating.
Observation on 4/1/19, at 10:43 A.M., showed the following:
-Resident #48 was seated in front of the nurses' station in his/her wheelchair with the brakes locked;
-Resident #8 was seated by the nurses' station in his/her wheelchair;
-NA L and CNA A had a conversation by the nurses' station;
-NA L said Resident #30 was pissed off because he/she had to wait to go pee because the aides were busy;
-CNA A asked if the resident was currently going to the bathroom;
-NA L said yes, but he/she is still pissed because it took so long;
-NA L said he/she was just waiting for the resident to pee so he/she could get him/her ready.
6. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 9:32 A.M., CNA B said the following:
-All residents should be treated with respect and dignity;
-Residents should never be rushed and staff should not use inappropriate language in front of residents';
-Side conversations should not happen in front of residents but this has occurred before.
7. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said the following:
-When assisting a resident to eat he/she sits down beside the resident, makes eye contact, cues the resident, and converses with the resident;
-Side conversations with another co-worker should not occur;
-Inappropriate language should not be used in front of residents or in areas where residents might hear it, he/she has heard this from other staff before;
-Residents' medical information should be kept confidential and not discussed in open areas or in front of other residents or visitors;
-Residents' should always be treated with dignity and respect, including cognitively impaired residents.
8. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:56 A.M., NA G said the following:
-When assisting a resident to eat he/she sits down beside the resident or residents, makes eye contact, and converses with the resident or residents;
-Side conversations with another co-worker should not occur, but he/she has participated in side conversations before;
-Inappropriate language should never be used in front of residents;
-Residents' medical information should be kept confidential and staff should not talk about it in open areas, but he/she has heard this happen before;
-Residents' should always be treated with respect;
-Residents' with cognitive impairment should be treated the same as all other residents.
9. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:03 P.M., LPN E said the following:
-When residents are being assisted to eat in the dining room the staff should sit beside the resident, make eye contact, encourage and cue the resident to eat or drink, and should converse with the resident;
-Staff should never stand beside a resident to assist with eating;
-Resident medical information should be kept confidential and should not be discussed in front of other residents;
-Inappropriate language should never be used in front of residents or family;
-All residents should be treated with dignity and respect.
10. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., with the administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) the following was said:
-When staff assist a resident with eating the staff member should sit beside the resident, make eye contact, encourage the resident to eat and drink, and have a conversation with the resident;
-Staff should never stand beside a resident to assist with eating and should never lean on a resident's wheelchair;
-Staff should never have side conversations about their home life or other resident's medical information in front of residents;
-Inappropriate language should never be used in front of a resident;
-A resident should never be rushed or told to hurry so that staff can see to their own needs, if the staff member needs to leave, then they should find another staff member to finish the resident's care;
-Staff should always treat residents, even those that are cognitively impaired, with dignity and respect, they should be nice to them.
MO00153487
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident choices regarding bath schedules for...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident choices regarding bath schedules for seven residents (Resident #24, #45, #61, #62, #69, #71, and #100) and failed to ensure menu planning was available to all residents of the facility. A sample of 23 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 77.
1. Record review showed the facility did not have a policy regarding residents' choices.
2. Record review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/6/19, showed the following information:
-admission date 3/29/18;
-Cognitively intact;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and bathing;
-Limited assistance of one staff person for locomotion on unit and personal hygiene;
-Supervision for eating;
-Diagnoses included stroke and hemiplegia (a form of paralysis that affects just one side of the body).
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 1/3/19, showed the following information:
-Resident is usually able to make needs known;
-Allow resident time to express needs;
-Resident can be incontinent.
(The care plan did not include any information regarding assistance with bathing activities of daily living (ADLs).)
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated December 2018, showed the the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 12/23/18 through 12/31/18.
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-From 12/23/18 through 1/7/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 1/14/19 through 2/22/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/1/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/1/19 through 2/22/19.
During an interview on 3/26/19, at 9:10 A.M., the resident said the following:
-The last shower he/she received was on 3/22/19;
-He/she has not been receiving a shower one time per week;
-He/she would like a shower at least twice a week;
-He/she talked to nursing about the issue, but nothing had been resolved.
3. Record review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admission date 7/29/18;
-Cognitively intact;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Limited assistance of one staff person for bathing;
-Diagnoses included conversion disorder with seizures.
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/6/19, showed the staff did not care plan any information regarding assistance with bathing activities of daily living (ADLs).
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive CNA Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-From 1/19/19 through 1/31/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/2/19 through 2/12/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/27/19 through 3/11/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/19/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the following information:
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/2/19 through 2/11/19;
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/27/19 through 2/28/19.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 12:19 P.M., the resident said the following:
-He/she would like to receive showers at least twice per week;
-Sometimes has to refuse showers because it interferes with an activity or therapy;
-The aides will not come back the next day to do the shower;
-Feels like he/she has to pick between things like receiving therapy, enjoying time with friends, or being clean.
4. Record review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admission date 6/17/18;
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance of two staff persons for bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for transfers and dressing
-Bathing activity did not occur in the past seven days;
-Diagnoses included history of urinary tract infections and Alzheimer's disease.
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/6/19, showed the following information:
-He/she has special soap to be used during showers;
-He/she can be incontinent of bowel and bladder;
-He/she needs assistance with ADLs such as bathing;
-Wash hair with showers at least once weekly.
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive CNA Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-From 1/14/19 through 1/24/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/9/19 through 2/18/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/1/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/9/19 through 2/18/19.
During an interview on 3/29/19, at 12:23 P.M., the resident's family member said the following:
-Bathing at the facility is not good;
-There is no schedule;
-There are a lot of days missed;
-The staff do not use the soap provided and the resident keeps getting rashes;
-He/she would like the resident to have a shower at least twice per week and would like to see a shower schedule implemented.
5. Record review of Resident #62's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admission date 11/7/18;
-Moderately cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility and personal hygiene;
-Extensive assistance of two staff persons for transfers, toileting, and dressing;
-Total dependence of two staff persons for bathing;
-Diagnoses included anxiety disorder.
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/6/19, showed the following information:
-Hoyer lift for all transfers.
(Staff did not include any information regarding assistance with bathing activities of daily living (ADLs).)
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive CNA Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-From 1/18/19 through 1/31/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/2/19 through 2/12/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 3/22/19 through 3/31/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the following information:
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/1/19 through 1/16/19;
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/18/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/2/19 through 2/12/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated March 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 3/22/19 through 3/31/19.
During an interview on 3/26/19, at 9:21 A.M., the resident said the following:
-There are issues with receiving showers;
-Facility staff will often tell them it is his/her shower time during another activity or appointment;
-Sometimes when they do give him/her a shower, they do not wash his/her body entirely;
-Family has given him/her showers before because the facility had not given him/her one is so long;
-There is no set schedule and that would be nice to have;
-Would like two showers a week and know in advance which days so that he/she can be prepared.
6. Record review of Resident #69's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admission date 9/3/17;
-Cognitively intact;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for toileting and bathing;
-Limited assistance of one staff person for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene;
-Supervision for transfers;
-Diagnoses included history of UTIs, hematuria (presence of blood in the urine), major depressive disorder, and neuropathic bladder (bladder dysfunction).
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/6/19, showed the resident needs assistance with ADLs, such as bathing, at times.
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive CNA Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-From 1/9/19 through 1/31/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/2/19 through 2/19/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/1/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/2/19 through 2/19/19.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 12:03 P.M., the resident said the following:
-He/she does not receive two showers a week, usually it is only one;
-Would like to receive two showers a week;
-There is no schedule and would like to see a schedule;
-Too many times shower time conflicts with other things like appointments, activities, and resident council meetings.
6. Record review of Resident #71's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admission date 12/11/18;
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Extensive assistance of one staff person for bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing;
-Limited assistance of one staff person for transfers and eating;
-Total dependence of one staff person for dressing;
-Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), anxiety disorder due to know physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), dementia without behavioral disturbance (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance
Record review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed on 3/6/19, showed the resident needs assistance with ADLs such as bathing.
Record review of the resident's Comprehensive CNA Shower Reviews, showed the following information:
-There were no records from 12/11/18 through 12/31/18 of the resident receiving or refusing a shower;
-There were no records from 1/1/19 through 1/31/19 of the resident receiving or refusing a shower;
-From 2/9/19 through 2/18/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower;
-From 2/27/19 through 3/6/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower by facility staff;
-From 3/8/19 through 3/19/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower by facility staff;
-From 3/21/19 through 4/2/19, the resident did not receive or refuse a shower by facility staff.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated December 2018, showed the following information:
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 12/11/18 through 12/16/18;
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 12/18/18 through 12/23/18.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated January 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 1/1/19 through 1/31/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated February 2019, showed the resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 2/9/19 through 2/18/19.
Record review of the facility's monthly shower log, dated March 2019, showed the following information:
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 3/8/19 through 3/19/19;
-The resident did not receive or refuse a shower from 3/27/19 through 3/31/19.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 2:20 P.M., the resident's family member said the following:
-The facility was not bathing the resident twice a week, it was usually not even once per week;
-Once started on hospice, the facility staff stopped doing bathing altogether;
-The resident likes to be clean and showered daily, which is his/her preference;
-At least twice per week is the expectation;
-There is not a schedule and has not been since the resident's admission;
-Showers occurred if and when there was enough staff to do the showers.
7. Record review of Resident #100's Discharge Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admitted to the facility on [DATE];
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses included chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (CIPD: a neurologic disorder characterized by progressive weakness and impaired sensory function in the arms and legs), anxiety disorder, and quadriparesis (weakness of arms and legs) from CIPD;
-Required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Bathing did not occur during the entire look back period of seven days;
-Resident was not receiving hospice services.
Record review of the resident's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following information:
-admitted to the facility on [DATE];
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses included chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (CIPD: a neurologic disorder characterized by progressive weakness and impaired sensory function in the arms and legs), anxiety disorder, and quadriparesis (weakness of arms and legs) from CIPD;
-Required limited to extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Bathing did not occur during the entire look back period of seven days;
-Resident was not receiving hospice services.
Record of resident's nurses' notes for the resident showed staff documented on 11/26/18, the following information:
-Resident stated he/she would prefer four showers per week. The ADON was notified and the bath schedule updated;
-Resident said he/she preferred tub baths and did not mind baths in the evening.
Record review of the resident's care plan, last updated 3/6/19, showed staff did not document information regarding the resident's preferences for bathing.
Record review of the resident's monthly shower logs combined with CNA bath charting for December 2018, and January 2019, showed the following information:
-Resident received a bath on 12/8, refused baths offered on 12/10 and 12/11, and received a bath on 12/18 (a gap of nine days without a bath);
-Resident received a bath on 12/24 (a gap of five days without a bath);
-Resident received a bath on 1/16/19 (a gap of 12 days without a bath);
-Resident received a bath on 1/27/19 (a gap of 10 days without a bath).
Record review of the resident's CNA bath charting for February 2019, showed the resident received baths on 2/3 and 2/6 (two of 28 days in the month.)
Record review of the resident's monthly shower log for February 2019, showed staff did not document any showers given by facility staff. The record showed the resident received showers given by hospice on 2/12, 2/16, 2/20 and 2/26.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:20 A.M., the administrator said the resident was not on hospice services.
8. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 9:32 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B said the following:
-He/she was hired as a full-time shower aide;
-He/she has been pulled to work the floor three days out of the last ten days worked;
-He/she has to help with dining room at every meal on his/her shift, which is breakfast and lunch;
-It can take up to three hours to get everything completed in the dining room because they cannot leave until all of the residents are finished eating;
-This does cut into the time left to give showers;
-Residents have not been receiving two showers a week.
9. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said the following:
-Residents do not receive two showers a week;
-Most residents would like at least two showers a week;
-There is not set schedule, which many residents have asked the facility to do;
-The residents would like a schedule because often they are left trying to choose between therapy or getting a shower.
10. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:56 A.M., NA G said the following:
-There is no schedule for bathing except on the special care unit (SCU);
-The residents that reside off of the SCU do not receive two showers a week, most of the time they do not get one a week;
-Residents have requested a schedule so they know what days and can be ready;
-Residents have voiced their unhappiness to him/her regarding the showers.
11. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:03 P.M., LPN E said the following:
-There is no shower schedule;
-The bath aides often get pulled to work the floor as care aides because staff calls in or doesn't show up;
-The residents often do not receive two showers a week.
12. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the following:
-There is currently no bathing schedule;
-The facility has tried a schedule in the past and the staff felt it did not work;
-Residents were not receiving two showers a week and that is the policy of the facility;
-The residents bathing varies based on their own preferences or if they are on hospice;
-The facility should be offering showers to residents on hospice in addition to the showers given by hospice staff;
-The facility does not have a good tracking system at this time and it often gets confusing;
-Bath aides do sometimes get pulled off shower duty to assist on the floor, it happened one time last week;
-They were not aware that the residents would like a shower schedule.
13. During an interview on 3/25/19, at 8:56 A.M., the kitchen manager said the following:
-The facility has one regular meal choice and an extra menu with choices of different all the time items;
-Residents are given a weekly meal packet and the extra menu to choose what they would like to have for each meal;
-The meal packet is due back on Saturday night before the next week starts;
-If residents are physically or cognitively unable to fill out the packet, then they do not get to pick what they would like and are served the regular meal;
-He/she does not assist the residents with picking out their meal, but will make a copy of the menus for them to keep in their room;
-If the resident is a new admission or returning from the hospital they are served what is on the regular menu that day.
14. During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:48 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) R said the following:
-Last week during lunch they ran out of the main dish, meatloaf, due to staff eating before residents;
-Residents were served a hamburger patty instead;
-Residents were not given a choice of the hamburger patty or something from the extra menu.
15. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator, DON, and ADON said the following:
-Residents are given the meal packet to fill out and the extra menu;
-They may pick either the regular entrée or something from the extra menu;
-Residents who are physically or cognitively unable to fill out the menu are assisted by the kitchen manager every week;
-Nursing staff do not usually assist the residents with the menus;
-Residents should always be allowed to choose between the main entrée and the extra menu;
-Residents should not have been served a hamburger patty instead of the main entrée and should have been given a choice.
MO00154201
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely attempt and document nonpharmalogical interventions prior to administering antipsychotic medication, failed to cons...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely attempt and document nonpharmalogical interventions prior to administering antipsychotic medication, failed to consistently document the reason for administration of a antipsyhotic medication, and failed to have a diagnosis that warranted use of a psychotropic medication for one resident (Resident #71) in a selected sample of 23. The facility census was 77.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use from the nursing guidelines manual, dated March 2015, showed the following information:
-Antipsychotic medication therapy shall be used only when it is necessary to treat a specific condition for which they are indicated and effective;
-Nursing staff will document in detail an individual's target symptom(s);
-The staff will observe, document, and report to the attending physician information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including antipsychotic medications;
-Antipsychotic medications shall only be used for the following conditions/diagnosis as documented in the record, consistent with the definition(s) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (current or subsequent editions): schizo-affective disorder, mood disorders, depression with psychotic features, and treatment of refractory major depression, psychosis, brief psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, delusional disorder, schizopreniform disorder, atypical psychosis, dementing illnesses with associated behavioral symptoms, medical illnesses or delirium with manic or psychotic symptoms and/or treatment-related psychosis or mania, where these meet the following criteria:
-The symptoms such as auditory, visual, or other hallucinations; delusions such as paranoia or grandiosity are identified as being due to mania or psychosis;
-The symptoms are severe enough that the individual is experiencing one or more of the following: inconsolable or persistent distress (fear, continuous yelling, screaming, distress associated with end-of-life, or crying), a significant decline in function, and/or substantial difficulty receiving needed care (not eating resulting in weight loss, fear, and not bathing leading to skin breakdown or infection);
-The symptoms are not due to preventable and treatable underlying causes;
-Nursing staff shall monitor and report any of the following side effects to the physician: sedation, orthostatic hypotension, lightheadedness, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, urinary retention, increased psychotic symptoms, extrapyramidal effects, akathisia, dystonia, tremor, rigidity, akinesia or tardive dyskinesia;
-The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications, or clearly documenting (based on assessing the situation) why the benefits of the medication outweigh the risks or suspected or confirmed adverse consequences.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Behavior Management Program, dated April 2006, showed the following information:
-Each resident who is receiving a psychoactive medication, residents who have had a recent dose reduction, and residents not receiving psychoactive medications, but are displaying routine behaviors will be placed a behavior management plan;
-Each resident will have a care plan identifying the reason for the medication and behavioral interventions to be implemented by each discipline;
-Each resident will be monitored quantitatively and have objectively documented behaviors;
-Each resident will have a comprehensive assessment completed to develop an individualized plan of care, interventions will be individualized, incorporating both proactive and reactive approaches;
-Nurses will document as incident occurs, the type and frequency of behaviors, interventions implemented precipitating events and the resident's response to the interventions provided;
-No psychoactive drug will be initiated without first being approved by the Behavior Management Committee, any psychoactive medication initiated or changed will be noted on the 24-hour report to alert the director of nursing (DON) and the team for follow up;
-Identification of a new problem behavior will be assessed to rule out other possible reasons for the resident's distress (environmental stressors, acute illness, medication change, etc.) prior to obtaining an order for a psychoactive medication;
-Alternative interventions must be implemented and recorded prior to the use of a as needed (PRN) medication or when orders are obtained to initiate or reinstate a psychoactive;
-The first choice of treatment should not be the use of psychoactive medications;
-The facility must implement alternative interventions prior to psychoactive medication use.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Behavior Charting Protocol, dated April 2006, showed the following information:
-All residents receiving antipsychotic medication or exhibit behaviors will be documented on as follows: as behavior occurs; behavior presented; location where behavior presented; interventions used to attempt to alter behavior; and outcome;
-Nurses will complete weekly summary of all behaviors, interventions tried, and outcomes to summarize what occurred during the week as scheduled.
-This facility will use psychoactive drugs only in the best interest of the resident, never for the convenience of the staff or to punish residents, and in conjunction with non-drug interventions and approaches whenever possible;
-An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose or excessive duration, or without adequate monitoring, without adequate indication for use, or in the presence of adverse consequences, which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Psychoactive medications are those prescribed to control mood, mental status, or behavior. These include anti-anxiety agents, sedative-hypnotic, antidepressants, anti-psychotics, and anti-manic drugs;
-Physician orders for all will include: medication name and strength, route of administration, frequency of administration, and target behavior;
-Documentation of medication administration will be monitored along with targeted behaviors.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Behavior Management Program, dated April 2006, showed the following information:
-Each resident who is receiving a psychoactive medication will be placed on a behavior management plan;
-Each resident will have a care plan identifying the reason for the medication and behavioral interventions to be implemented by each discipline;
-Identification of a new problem behavior will be assessed to rule out other possible reasons for the resident's distress (i.e. environmental stressors, acute illness, medication change, etc.), prior to obtaining an order for a psychoactive medication.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Behavior Charting Protocol, dated April 2006, showed the following information:
-All resident that receive antipsychotic medication or exhibit behaviors will be documented on as follows;
-As behavior occurs;
-Behavior presented;
-Location where behavior presented;
-Interventions used to attempt to alter behavior;
-Outcome;
-Nurses will complete a weekly summary of all behaviors, interventions tried, and outcomes to summarize what occurred during that week as scheduled on the following page.
1. Record review of Resident #71's face sheet (brief information sheet) showed the following information:
-admission date of 12/11/18;
-Diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset (irreversible, progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), anxiety disorder due to know physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), dementia without behavioral disturbance (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance.
Record review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/10/19, showed the following information:
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others daily;
-Extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Total dependence for locomotion;
-Limited assistance with transfers and eating.
Record review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS) showed the following information:
-An order dated 3/13/19, for Haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication), 5 milligrams (mg), by mouth as needed (PRN) every four hours, for Alzheimer's disease;
-An order dated 3/13/19, for Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication), 5 mg, one tablet by mouth at bedtime for Alzheimer's disease.
Record review of the nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed Haloperidol was administered:
-On 3/14/19 two times, at 3:30 P.M., for constant chanting and the second time no time and reason were recorded;
-On 3/15/19 one time, at 1:00 A.M., for constant yelling out;
-On 3/16/19 two times, at 6:00 A.M., for yelling out and the second time no time and reason were recorded;
-On 3/18/19 two times, at 9:30 A.M., for constant yelling out and the second time no time and reason were recorded;
-On 3/19/19 two times, at 6:10 P.M., for constant yelling and the second time no time and reason were recorded;
-On 3/20/19 three times, at 9:00 A.M., for yelling out and anxiety, at 3:00 P.M., for repetitive yelling out, and at 11:30 P.M., for yelling out and anxiety;
-On 3/21/19 two times, at 1:00 P.M., for yelling out repetitively and at 6:20 P.M., for yelling out repetitively;
-On 3/22/19 two times, at 9:00 A.M., for yelling out repetitively and at 2:40 P.M., for yelling out repetitively;
-On 3/24/19 one time, at 9:30 A.M., for yelling out repetitively;
Record review of the resident's care plan, last updated 3/25/19, showed the following information:
-Anticipate needs;
-Redirect as needed;
-Monitor for changes in condition;
-Document behaviors as they occur;
-Attempt to redirect resident;
-Provide reassurances;
-Provide a calm and quiet environment with reassurances.
(Staff did not care plan the use of antipsychotic medications Zyprexa and Haldol.)
Observation on 3/25/19, at 8:33 A.M,. showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station quietly saying he/she needed help. Facility staff did not intervene or check on the resident.
Record review of the nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed staff administered Haloperidol on 3/25/19 two times, at 12:47 P.M., for yelling I need help and at 10:10 P.M., for yelling.
Observation on 3/26/19, at 9:47 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident had drool hanging from the right side of his/her mouth. The facility staff did not assist or reposition the resident.
During an interview on 3/26/19, at 10:30 A.M., the hospice nurse said the resident had behaviors that they are trying to control with scheduled pain medications. The resident is not receiving her pain medications per the physician's orders and the resident has significant behaviors when the facility does not administer the medications appropriately and when they do not perform interventions for the resident. The resident is uncomfortable lying in bed and does not get toileted as he/she should. When the facility skips the pain medications, the resident is usually given Haldol to control the behaviors. The hospice nurse said he/she has repeatedly told the facility to not use the Haldol unless it is a last resort.
Observation on 3/26/19, at 1:02 P.M., showed the resident seated upright with pillows behind his/her head and under his/her right arm in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident had drool hanging from the right side of his/her mouth. The resident appeared calm.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 8:43 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair by the nurses' station. The resident quietly said he/she needed help and facility staff did not intervene or check on the resident.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 9:09 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair by the nurses' station. The resident smiled and waved hello.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 9:45 A.M. to 10:30 A.M., showed the resident was seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair by the nurses' station. The facility staff did not check on the resident or intervene. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was seated at the nurses' station and did not check on the resident or intervene.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:00 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair by the nurses' station and the resident said he/she needed help repetitively in a normal tone of voice. Facility staff did not check on the resident or intervene.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:06 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair and the resident said he/she needed help and he/she needed help to go to the bathroom repetitively. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B stopped and repositioned the resident, but did not ask the resident if he/she needed to use the bathroom.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:09 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair and the resident loudly said he/she needed help to go to the bathroom repetitively. Facility staff did not check on the resident or intervene.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:19 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station and CNA B walked by the resident when the resident said he/she needed help to go to the bathroom repetitively. CNA B did not stop or check on the resident.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:31 A.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident was agitated and loudly said he/she needed help to go to the bathroom repeatedly. CNA B stopped and asked the resident if he/she would like to go to the bathroom and the resident responded yes. The resident was toileted and the resident was placed in front of the nurses' station in his/her reclining wheelchair seated and leaned to the right again in the wheelchair. CNA B covered the resident's legs with a blanket turned upside down and the resident said no loudly and repetitively while he/she pulled the blanket up. CNA B and other facility staff did not assist the resident.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:37 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair, with the gait belt secured around the resident's upper torso. The resident was agitated and repeatedly said he/she needed help loudly and pulled at the blanket and the gait belt.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 11:55 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair in his/her room with a family member. The resident was agitated and repeatedly said he/she needed help loudly. The resident's family member removed the blanket and placed it back on his/her legs right side up and repositioned the resident with pillows placed under his/her right arm to assist with sitting up straight. The gait belt was still secured around the resident's upper torso. The resident calmed down and ate lunch, which he/she ate unassisted.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 2:01 P.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair with the gait belt wrapped around his/her upper torso. The resident pulled at the gait belt and quietly said he/she needed help and his/her back hurts. The resident's family member pushed the call light and Nurse Aide (NA) P assisted the resident to bed. The resident's family member pointed out that the resident still had the gait belt around his/her upper torso from being toileted right before lunch. NA P removed the gait belt and the resident calmed down and closed his/her eyes.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 3:41 P.M., showed the resident laid in bed on his/her back with eyes open and resident smiled.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 4:18 P.M., showed the resident laid in bed on his/her back with eyes closed.
Observation on 3/27/19, at 5:43 P.M., showed the resident laid in bed on his/her back, eyes open, and the resident repeatedly said he/she needed help. Facility staff did not check on the resident or offer interventions.
During an observation and an interview on 3/28/19, at 2:20 P.M., showed the resident seated in his/her reclining wheelchair in his/her room. The resident's family member said the resident was toileted twice at the family member's request, the resident had eaten lunch, and had listened to music. The resident appeared calm and when asked if he/she was okay, said yes and smiled.
Record review of the resident's nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed staff administered Haloperidol on 3/28/19 one time, at 9:00 P.M., for yelling repetitively.
Record review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS) showed the following information:
-On 3/29/19, an order to discontinue Haloperidol, 5 mg, by mouth PRN every four hours;
-On 3/29/19, an order for Haloperidol, 5 mg, by mouth PRN every four hours for Alzheimer's disease;
-On 3/29/19, an order for Zyprexa, 5 mg, by mouth twice a day in the morning and afternoon for dementia without behavioral disturbance.
Observation on 3/29/19, at 9:03 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her high back wheelchair at the nurses' station. There was a call light ringing and within a minute three more call lights started ringing. The call lights sounded for over 10 minutes and the resident showed signs and symptoms of distress and was agitated. The resident said he/she need help repeatedly in a loud voice and banged his/her right hand on his/her leg. The resident continued this way for 15 minutes before facility staff checked on him/her. When facility staff checked on the resident they asked what do you need and the resident would respond loudly with he/she needed help. Facility staff did not attempt interventions with the resident.
Observation on 3/29/19, at 10:01 A.M., showed the resident seated and leaned to the right in his/her high back wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident appeared calm and he/she watched people as they walked by. The call lights had been answered and were not ringing at this time.
Record review of the resident's nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed staff administered the Haloperidol on 3/29/19 two times, at 1:00 P.M., for yelling and anxiety and at 7:00 P.M., for repetitive I need help and the second time no time and reason were recorded;
During an observation and an interview on 3/29/19, at 3:27 P.M., showed the resident was agitated and said he/she needed help to go to bed repeatedly and in a loud voice. The call lights rang repeatedly during at this time. NA O stopped by the resident and asked if he/she would like to go to bed. The resident said yes. NA O and NA P assisted the resident to bed. The resident became more agitated once in bed and repeatedly said he/she needed help to go to bed loudly. NA O said the resident does this frequently and he/she will go through a series of questions with the resident until the resident answers. If the resident doesn't answer, then NA O said he/she will offer a snack or an activity to redirect the resident. NA O said usually the intervention questions or the snack works to calm the resident. NA O asked the resident intervention questions and the resident responded with no answers until NA O asked if he/she would like to go to the bathroom. The resident said yes. NA O and NA P assisted the resident to the bathroom and transferred him/her back to bed. The resident was agitated and yelling he/she needed help to go back to bed. NA O asked the intervention questions again and the resident said no until NA O asked if he/she would like to be placed in his/her recliner. The resident said yes. NA O and NA P transferred the resident back to the recliner and the resident calmed down. NA O pushed the resident out to the common area in front of the nurses' station.
Record review of the resident's nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed staff administered Haloperidol on 3/30/19 one time, no time or reason were recorded.
Observation on 3/30/19, at 10:41 A.M., showed the resident was seated upright in his/her reclining wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident appeared calm and smiled at people.
Observation on 3/30/19, at 2:18 P.M., showed the resident was seated and leaned to the right in his/her reclining wheelchair and said he/she needed help repeatedly in a quiet voice. The resident did not appear to be agitated or show signs or symptoms of distress.
Record review of the resident's nurses' medical record administration of PRN medications, dated March 2019, showed staff administered Haloperidol on 3/31/19 one time, 6:50 A.M., for anxiety and yelling I need help repeatedly.
Observation on 3/31/19, at 11:01 A.M., showed the resident was seated upright in his/her wheelchair in his/her room. The resident was being visited by his/her family member and was going to eat lunch. The resident was responsive and calm.
Observation on 4/2/19, at 9:15 A.M., showed the resident seated upright in high back wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident repeatedly said he/she needed help in a loud voice. The resident had his/her coloring book and color pencils and a cup of orange juice. The assistant director of nursing (ADON) checked on the resident and asked the resident what he/she needed. The resident responded with he/she needed help. The ADON asked the resident if he/she would like to lie down and the resident said yes. The ADON transferred the resident from the high back wheelchair to the reclining wheelchair in the hall in front of the nurses' station. The resident cried out during the transfer.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said the following:
-The resident should be checked every 1-2 hours;
-The resident will respond to direct questions with yes and no answer;
-Behavioral interventions should be attempted to control the behaviors and notify the charge nurse if the behavior continues.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:56 A.M., NA G said the following:
-The resident is usually awake and will say I need help;
-The resident is easily calmed down if you sit with him/her for a few minutes and offer reassurances;
-The resident likes to color and loves to eat, so often his/her coloring book or food will also calm the resident down;
-The resident will respond with yes or no to direct questions;
-The residents should be checked every 1-2 hours;
-Behavioral interventions should be used prior to notifying the charge nurse for medication.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:03 P.M., LPN E said the following:
-The staff are supposed to round on the residents every 2 hours and should toilet or change the residents at that time if they are wet or need to go to the bathroom;
-The resident has had behaviors of repeatedly saying I need help since he/she admitted to the facility but it has been worse in the past month;
-He/she feels that the resident has peaked in his/her disease process and that has caused the behaviors to worsen;
-The staff should use all behavioral interventions prior to giving medications;
-The behavioral interventions are toileting, offering a snack or a drink, offering an activity, one on one time; offering reassurances, offering to lay down the resident, and offering reassurances;
-If these fail to work then they will give a medication to assist the resident to control the behaviors;
-An antipsychotic is used only as a last resort and since the doctor wrote the prescription it is available to use if needed.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator, DON, and ADON said the following:
-Antipsychotic medication is used for psychotic disorders and should be written with the correct diagnosis;
-Alzheimer's is not a correct diagnosis;
-PRN psychotropic medications should be given when all other non-pharmacological interventions have been exhausted and the resident is beside themselves yelling;
-Those interventions include toileting, offering a snack, reposition, putting to bed, food, and redirection;
-They expect staff to check on and toilet or change residents every 2 hours and as needed;
-Staff should document the behaviors and the interventions used on the treatment administration record (TAR);
-Behavioral interventions were tried and should have been documented;
-If an antipsychotic is given, staff should document when the medication was given, the reason it was given, and if it was effective or not;
-The resident has had an recent increase in behaviors and Haldol was ordered for him/her PRN;
-They were not aware that the resident had received Haldol 16 out of the last 21 days.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications per manufacturer's guidelines for four residents (Residents #18, #19, #37, and #73) when the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications per manufacturer's guidelines for four residents (Residents #18, #19, #37, and #73) when the facility kept opened eye drops for the residents longer than manufacturer recommendations. The facility also failed to dispose of expired medications; failed to store all medication at the correct temperature; failed dispose of open vials of medication per recommended guidelines; and stored medication in an unmarked medication cup. The facility census was 77.
Record review of the Center's for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, last updated 8/16/16, and showed the following:
-Medication vials should be dedicated to a single resident whenever possible;
-Medication vials should always be discarded whenever sterility is compromised or questionable;
-If a multi-dose vial has been opened or accessed (for example needle-punctured) the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days, unless the manufacturer specified a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial;
-The preservative in multi-dose vials has no effect on viruses and does not protect against contamination when healthcare personnel fail to follow safe injection practices.
Record review of the facility's Storage of Medication Policy, dated March 2015, showed the following:
-No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with established guidelines;
-Drugs must be stored at appropriate temperature levels;
-Drugs must be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, or carts.
Record review of the recommendations by the American Academy of Ophthalmology showed the following:
-The older the bottle of eye drops, the greater chance that it has been contaminated, and the longer time the bacteria has to grow;
-A good rule of thumb is to throw away any opened bottle of eye drops after three months.
Record review of the manufacturer's package insert for dorzolamide (antiglaucoma eye drop) showed to discard the bottle of solution 28 days after opening.
Record review of the manufacturer's package insert for latanaprost (antiglaucoma eye drop) showed to discard the bottle of solution six weeks after opening.
1. Observation of the Love Unit medication room on 03/28/19, 9:49 A.M., with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) V present, showed the following:
-A Humalog (a fast-acting insulin) Kwikpen (prefilled device with insulin provided by the manufacturer) with an expiration date of 11/2018;
-Located in the refrigerator, three acetaminophen (pain reliever with brand name of Tylenol) rectal suppositories with an expiration date of 11/2018;
-Located in an upper cabinet in the Love Unit medication room one vial of Xylocaine (an anesthetic solution injected under the skin and used to numb the skin and relieve pain), 1% HCI (hydrochloride) injection, which showed a hand-written opened date 1/17/19, with the protective cap off.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 12:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing said the following:
-The expired vial of Xylocaine should have been discarded after use;
2. Record review of Resident # 18's face sheet (general information) showed the following:
-admission date of 7/12/13;
-Diagnoses of glaucoma (eye disease that affects the optic nerve in the eye affecting vision).
Record review of the resident's March 2019 physicians' orders showed the following:
-An order, dated 2/22/19, for dorzolamide 2%, one drop in left eye three times a day;
-An order, dated 2/22/19, for latanoprost drops, 0.005 %, one drop both eyes once a day at 7:30 P.M.
Observation of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box of latanoprost, 125 micrograms (mcg)/2.5 milliliter (ml), with bottle of medication inside and the resident's name on it. A opened date of 1/19/19 was written on the box lid;
-A box of dorzolamide 2%, with bottle of medication inside, with the resident's name on it. The box had no date on the lid or the bottle.
3. Record review of Resident # 37's face sheet showed the following:
-admission date of 9/9/04;
-Diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in the mass of muscle).
Record review of the resident's March 2019 physicians' orders showed the following:
-An order, dated 8/31/17, for artificial tears 1.4%, polyvinyl alcohol (eye lubricant), one drop in both eyes every day, twice a day for diagnosis of muscle wasting.
Observation of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box of artificial tears with a bottle of solution in it with the resident's name on it. No opened date was noted written on the box or the bottle.
4. Record review of Resident # 19's face sheet showed the following:
-admission date of 1/12/07;
-Diagnosis of flaccid hemiplegia (paralysis affecting movement of the body) affecting unspecified side.
Record review of the resident's March 2019 physicians' orders showed the following:
-An order, dated 5/31/17, for artificial tears 1.4 %, polyvinyl alcohol, one drop in both eyes four times a day for diagnosis of flaccid hemiplegia affecting non-dominant side.
Observation of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box of artificial tears with a bottle of solution in it, with the resident's name on it. No opened date was noted on the box or the lid.
5. Record review of Resident # 73's face sheet showed the following:
-admission date of 3/2/18;
-Diagnosis of dry eye syndrome of unspecified lacrimal gland (gland that secretes tears).
Record review of the resident's March 2019 physicians' orders showed the following:
-An order, dated 6/20/18, for artificial tears (PF) (dextran 70-hypromellose - a lubricant added to artificial tear solution for treatment of dry eyes), two drops in both eyes four times a day.
Observation of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box of artificial tears (PF) (dextran 70-hypromellose) with a bottle of solution in it with the resident's name on it. No opened date was written on the box or the bottle.
6. Observation of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box containing nine bisacodyl (laxative to relieve constipation) suppositories (inserted rectally) that showed an expiration date of 02/2018.
7. Observation and interview, during the inspection of the Love Unit medication cart, in the Love Unit medication room, on 3/28/19, at 9:49 A.M., showed the following:
-A box of medication was picked up for inspection. Two cups of pills in unmarked plastic medication cups in the top drawer of the medication cart, covered with loose paper scraps, spilled over into the top drawer of the medication cart.
-CMT V and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F witnessed the pills being spilled in the medication cart. CMT V said the pills had not been there yesterday, so the pills were probably from the night shift. CMT V said the pills could be for Resident #28 because the medications looked like night medications for the resident because the pills contained a Norco (name brand for Hydrocodone with acetaminophen), calcium carbonate (an antacid that lowers acid amount in the stomach or to treat low levels of calcium in the blood), Tegretol (a medication that can treat nerve pain, seizures, and bipolar disorder-a mental disorder with symptoms of mania and depression), Montelukast (a medication to treat allergies and asthma attacks), and a pill with an A on it.
Record review of Resident #28's medication administration record (MAR) record showed the following:
-admission date of 4/5/10;
-Diagnosis of pain;
-An order, dated 6/20/17, for calcium carbonate 1500 milligrams (mg) with Vitamin D3 400 units, twice a day at 9:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M.;
-An order, dated 6/2/17, for Tegretol XR (Extended Release) 100 mg, twice a day at 9:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M.;
-An order, dated 5/2/17, for Montelukast 10 mg once and evening;
-An order, dated 4/26/18, for Hydrocodone-acetaminophen tablet, 5-325 mg twice a day for pain at 9:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M.
Record review of the resident's MAR showed the most recent dates circled (to indicate not given) prior to the medication cart inspection was 3/26/19 for the morning doses. A note was written on the back of a MAR by CMT V that showed on 3/26/19, the resident refused medications.
8. Record review of manufacturer's instructions for Ativan Intensol (an antianxiety medication) showed to store at cold temperature, and to refrigerate at 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit.
Observation and interview on 03/28/19, at 3:16 P.M., showed the Hope Unit medication room refrigerator had no Ativan Intensol located in it. The Ativan Intensol was located in the locked E-kit in an upper cabinet. The DON said there was to be only one Ativan Intensol at a time in the refrigerator.
9. Observation on 3/28/19, at 10:55 A.M., of the 300 hall medication room showed one stock bottle (can be used for any resident with a physician order for that medication) of Enteric Coated Aspirin with an expiration date of 02/2019.
10. During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:38 A.M., CMT N said everyone was responsible for checking for expired medications. The process was to go through every bottle of medication. When a bottle is opened, it should be dated, including eye drops. Medications should be checked weekly by just whoever can get to it. There is someone who checks the cabinets for restocking purposes; the transportation person. The refrigerators are checked by the CMT or nurse. The nurses check the insulins. Everyone checks the suppositories. Nurses check the Tylenol suppositories and the glass vials of medications. The nurses administer Ativan Intensol, and it should be kept in the refrigerator. If medications are not administered to a resident for some reason, they should be destroyed right away. Staff should not leave unmarked medications in medication cups in the medication cart.
11. During an interview on 3/29/19, at 10:50 A.M., LPN F said whoever is on the medication cart is responsible for checking for expired medications. A nurse or CMT can check the refrigerators. No one specific is assigned to check it. Nurses check the insulins and suppositories. When a vial of medication is opened such as Xylocaine, the date should be written on it. With Xylocaine, it should be thrown away after opened and used once. It is given with Rocephin (antibiotic) here. The vials are good for 30 days after opened sometimes. When staff open new bottles of eye drops, they should write the date opened on them. It is important to do so because they expire like insulins do within 30 days. Liquid Ativan Intensol should be kept in the refrigerator.
12. During an interview on 3/29/19, at 1:43 P.M., LPN E said staff should check medication carts, refrigerators, and cabinets for expired medications. Whoever puts the new medications in the cabinets should check for the old ones and remove them. Vials of medications such as Xylocaine, should be dated when opened along with the resident's name. LPN E was not aware of the expiration date after opening a vial. Eye drops were good for 30 days after opening. The date should be written on them when they were opened. The CMT's and nurses checked for expired medications in the refrigerators. The nurses checked the insulins and CMT's checked the suppositories. If expired medications were found, they should be disposed of right away. Ativan Intensol should be stored in the refrigerator. If medications could not be administered, he/she would dispose of them. If LPN E found medications in a cup in the cart, he/she would dispose of in the drug buster. Nurses should not leave medications in the medication cart without a name written on the cup.
13. During an interview on 4/1/19, at 1:30 P.M., the DON said nurses and CMT's were responsible for checking for expired medications that are on the units. They should look at the medications for expiration dates every time they pass medications. Periodically, the facility did audits with no set time frame. The nurses check the refrigerators since they are the ones with the keys, and should check the medications before using them. Department heads were to check the expired medications weekly in the medication rooms, but they have just been asking the nurses instead of checking the medications themselves. We discovered a failure there. We will start having them look at the medications themselves. As for the cabinets, the CMT's check and stock those. Anything injectable is to be checked by the nurses, including insulins, since they administer those. Suppositories in the refrigerator and the medication carts should be checked by the CMT's. Tylenol suppositories should be checked by the nurses. Expired medications should be disposed of. Staff should write the opened date on new medications either on the box or the bottle. Vials of Xylocaine should be disposed of after one use even though they are large vials. That is my expectation due to infection control issues. Ativan Intensol should be stored in the refrigerator. We replaced the Ativan Intensol found in the cabinet, and I talked to the nurse involved about proper storage of it. Staff should not leave unmarked medications in medication cups in the medication cart. The facility did an investigation into the medications found in the medication cart on Love Unit, and could not narrow down all of the morning medications. Some of those medications might have belonged to Resident # 28. It was important to not leave medications in unmarked cups in the medication cart because we would need to know whose they were, and they would need to be destroyed. One of the pills was a Norco. She had talked to CMT V who swore she wasn't aware of the unmarked pills. She was going to in-service all CMT's.
14. During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:30 P.M., the DON said staff should not administer medications that were past the usage date on the package, because they might not be effective or they might be overly potent.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when staff f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when staff failed to store food properly; staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene when handling food items and food contact surfaces; when staff failed to wear facial hair nets; when staff failed to dry dishes properly; when staff failed to ensure that the warewasher was working properly; when staff failed to keep non-contact food surfaces clean; and when staff failed to remove dented cans from the food storage area. The facility had a census of 77 residents.
1. Record review of the 2013 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code showed the following:
-Depending on the circumstances, rusted, and pitted or dented cans may present a serious potential hazard;
-Damaged packaging may allow the entry of bacteria or other contaminants into the contained food.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Receiving and Storage of Food, dated May 2015, showed the following information:
-The Dining Services Manager is responsible for receiving and storing food and non-food items;
-Keep all foods in clean, undamaged wrappers or packages.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 8:23 A.M., showed the following:
-One 105 ounce can of fruit cocktail dented and creased on the top of the can and in first rotation on the shelf;
-One 106 ounce can of applesauce contained a dent about three inches in length on the side of the can;
-One 50 ounce can of Campbell's tomato soup creased on the top of the can and dented on the side of the can;
-One 105 ounce can of Reliance tomatoes creased down the entire side of the can and put on a crate to hold open the dry goods storage room door;
-One 105 ounce can of prunes dented on the side of the can and put on a crate to hold open the dry goods storage room door;
-One 106 ounce can of diced potatoes dented on side of can and in first rotation on the shelf;
-One 105 ounce can of purple [NAME] halves with the top of the can entirely dented and put on a crate to hold open the dry goods storage room door;
-One 106 ounce can of kosher dill pickle spears with a dent on the side of the can and put on a crate to hold open the dry goods storage room door.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 9:53 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) R said dented cans should never be used, they are supposed to be taken to the kitchen manager's office for return to the vendor.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said the following:
-Dented cans should be removed immediately from the dry storage goods area and placed in the kitchen manager's office for return to vendor;
-Dented cans should never be used to serve food to residents.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said dented cans should be placed in the kitchen supervisor's office for return to the vendor.
2. Record review of the 2013 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code showed the following:
-Food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food in a clean, dry location; where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and at least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor;
-Food in packages and working containers may be stored less than 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor on case lot handling equipment;
-Pressurized beverage containers, cased food in waterproof containers such as bottles or cans, and milk containers in plastic crates may be stored on a floor that is clean and not exposed to floor moisture.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Dry Food and Supplies, dated May 2015, showed the following information:
-The dietary department will store dry food and supplies according to facility guidelines and state regulations;
-Food is to be stored a minimum of six inches above the floor and 18 inches from the ceiling and sprinkler heads;
-Food should be protected from splash, overheated pipes, or other contamination;
-Contents of open cases will be stored on shelves.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 8:23 A.M., showed the following:
-Six 105 ounce cans of fruit cocktail, five 106 ounce cans of green beans, nine quart boxes of prune juice, one box of graham cracker crumbs, six 106 ounce cans of cream style corn, one box of corn flakes, one box of Reynold's foil wrap, two boxes of individual non-dairy creamer packets, one box of individual strawberry jam packets, one box of stuffing mix, and one box of saltine crackers sitting on the floor in the dry goods storage room;
-One stack of milk crates stacked four high, one stack of milk crates stacked three high, and one stack of milk crates stacked six high with assorted milk in them, stored directly on the floor of the walk-in cooler;
-Under the stacks of milk crates, a white liquid puddle was on the floor of the walk-in cooler;
-Food stored in the walk-in cooler and the two walk-in freezers stored on the bottom shelf of the shelving units was stored 1.5 inches off the ground.
During an interview on 3/25/19, at 8:41 A.M., the kitchen supervisor said the following:
-The dry good items on the floor were delivered on 3/22/19 and he/she ran out of time to get them put away;
-The weekend staff should have put the items away but failed to do so.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 9:53 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) R said the following:
-Food should never be stored on the floor in any area;
-He/she did not know how high off the floor the shelves are supposed to be.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said the following:
-All food, including dry goods, should be put away as soon as the items are delivered;
-Items should never be stored on the floor;
-Items should be stored at least 6 inches off the floor.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said:
-Food should be put away in storage immediately;
-Food should never be stored directly on the floor.
3. Record review of the 2013 FDA Food Code showed the following:
-Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles;
-After touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms;
-During food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks;
-Before donning gloves to initiate a task that involves working with food;
-After engaging in other activities that contaminate hands.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Personnel Guidelines, dated May 2015, showed the following information:
-Hands should be washed: before beginning shift, after breaks, after using the restroom, after smoking or eating, after blowing nose, after disposing of trash or food, after handling dirty dishes, after handling raw meat, poultry, or eggs, after picking up anything from the floor, and any other time deemed necessary.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 12:07 P.M., showed the following:
-DA S touch his/her face and then without gloves on, loaded resident plates onto the trays, and then placed the tray onto the cart (the DA did not wash his/her hands after touching his/he face).
-Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and NA G assisted with passing trays to residents;
-CNA M and NA G did not wash their hands after passing trays to residents;
-CNA M sat with two residents to assist them with eating;
-CNA M picked up a resident's roll and buttered it with his/her bare hands;
-NA G sat with two resident to assist them with eating;
-NA G wiped his/her mouth with his/her right hand, picked up a resident's roll with his/her right hand, tore it open, and handed a piece of the roll to the resident to eat.
During an interview on 3/28/19, at 9:53 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) R said the following:
-When in doubt always wash hands;
-Wash hands upon entering the kitchen, in between tasks, dirty to clean, prior to and after using gloves, and every time you are able to;
-Staff should never touch their face or other body parts and continue to prepare food, they should wash their hands first;
-Staff should never touch a resident's food with their bare hands, only with a glove or utensils.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said the following:
-Staff should wash hands upon entering the kitchen, in between tasks, prior to putting on gloves and after removing gloves, when they have come into contact with something dirty, and any other time they are not sure;
-Staff should not touch their face, not wash hands, and continue to prepare food;
-Staff should never touch a resident's food with their bare hands, they should use gloves or utensils only.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 9:32 A.M., with CNA B said:
-Hands should be washed prior to passing trays;
-Sanitizer is to be used in between trays, but they do not always use it due to time constraints;
-Staff are not supposed to pick up the residents' food with their hands, but he/she sometimes does pick up the food with his/her bare hand.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:23 A.M., CNA M said:
-Staff are supposed to wash hands upon entering the dining room and prior to passing trays;
-Staff are supposed to use hand sanitizer in between each tray, but this doesn't always happen;
-Staff are not supposed to touch residents' food with bare hands, they should always use a utensil or a glove, but he/she does use his/her bare hand and touch resident food sometimes;
-If they touch something with their hand by accident, they should get a new one from the kitchen.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:56 A.M., Nurse Aide (NA) G said:
-Staff should wash hands upon entering the dining room and before passing trays;
-Sanitizer should be used between each tray;
-Staff are not to touch resident food with bare hands, but he/she has done it in the past.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 1:06 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said:
-Staff are expected to wash hands after entering the dining room and before passing resident trays;
-Staff are expected to use sanitizer between each tray pass;
-Staff are not to touch resident food with their bare hands.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said all staff are expected to follow proper hand hygiene and should never touch the resident's food with their bare hands.
4. Record review of the 2013 FDA Food Code showed the following:
-Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed to be worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Personnel Guidelines, dated May 2015, showed the following information:
-Dietary employees will follow the established facility dress code plus the guidelines;
-Employees of the dietary department handle the food that is eaten by everyone and for this reason be conscious of clean and sanitary habits;
-Hairnets or bouffant disposable caps should be worn at all times and should cover the entire head of hair.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 12:07 P.M., showed DA S did not have on a beard restraint while preparing plates on the food service line for resident consumption.
Observation of the kitchen on 4/1/19, beginning at 2:46 P.M., showed DA S did not have on a beard restraint while preparing drink mixes for resident consumption.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said the following:
-Hair nets and beard restraints are required to be worn by all staff;
-Staff should not in the kitchen without donning this equipment;
-Staff should not be preparing food or beverages for resident consumption without wearing the equipment;
-The facility provides the equipment free of charge to the staff.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said all staff are expected to wear hairnets and beard restraints should be worn when they enter the kitchen area.
5. Record review of the 2013 FDA Food Code showed the following:
-Warewashing machines require the presence of a temperature measuring device in each tank of the warewashing machine and is based on the importance of temperature in the sanitization step;
-In hot water machines it is critical that minimum temperatures be met at various cycles so that the cumulative effect of successively rising temperatures causes the surface of the item being washed to reach the minimum temperature for sanitization;
-When chemical sanitizers are used, specific minimum temperatures must be met because of the effectiveness of chemical sanitization is directly affected by the temperature of the solution.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing, with no date, showed the following information:
-Fill dish machine with water and turn on heaters according to manufacturer's instructions;
-Check chemical dispensers for proper operation and adequate supply of chemical;
-Record temperature of wash and rinse cycles three times daily on heat sanitized machines and one time daily on chemical sanitized machines.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 8:23 A.M., showed the following:
-Dirty utensils in the drawers;
-Nine dinner plates with food still stuck to them;
-Three racks of plastic cups with a cloudy residue on them;
-Two racks of coffee mugs with a residue on them.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/27/19, beginning at 9:14 A.M., showed the two serving trays of glasses, turned upside down on the trays with a cloudy residue on them.
During an interview on 3/28/19, beginning at 9:53 A.M., DA R said the dishes sometimes have a residue or have food still on them, he/she will send them back when they are found this way.
Observation of the kitchen on 4/1/19, beginning at 2:46 P.M., showed the following:
-Four racks of plastic cups with a cloudy residue on them;
-Steam tray pans (1/4, ½, and full) with food still stuck on them;
-Dinner plates with a residue on them;-The temperature gauge on the warewashing machine was broken;
-The temperatures were taken manually with a thermometer due to the temperature gauge being broken;
-The first wash cycle reached a temperature of 88 degrees F;
-DA T picked up a red hose from the ground, placed it along the back wall, into the warewashing machine, and turned on the water;
-The water was turned on and the warewashing machine was started for the second wash cycle;
-The second wash cycle reached a temperature of 91 degrees F;
-The warewashing machine was started for a third wash cycle;
-The third wash cycle reached a temperature of 94 degrees F.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 2:46 P.M., DA T said:
-The warewashing machine does not clean the dishware, utensils, and cups like it should due to it is broken;
-The residue will be on everything if the hose is not used to reach the proper water level in the machine;
-The machine has been broken for several weeks;
-If they do not use the hose, then the machine does not reach the correct water levels and it leaves food and residue on the dishes;
-The hose runs directly into the machine and they run it the entire time that they are washing dishes and utensils;
-They are supposed to take the temperature readings every shift;
-The temperature gauge has been broken for over six months;
-Maintenance has been aware of the problem for a while.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said:
-The warewashing machine has been broken for a while, the top is calcified and cannot be taken off, the filter has to be changed in order for the right amount of water to get into the machine;
-They are using the hose to offset that for now;
-The temperature gauge has been broken for a while too, was not aware the staff are not temping the water or that it is not getting up to the specified standards of the machine of 120 degrees F or higher;
-Dishes should not be put away dirty, but should be sent back to be washed, they are supposed to spot check them before putting them away.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:04 A.M., the maintenance supervisor said:
-He/she was aware the warewashing machine was broken and has scheduled an appointment to get it fixed;
-He/she was not aware the temperature gauge was broken on the machine, but will ask them to look at that too;
-Does not think the water hose will have any bacteria in it and it is safe for use to fill the warewashing machine.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said:
-Should follow manufacturer directions for washing dishes;
-Dishes should never be put away dirty.
6. Record review of the 2013 FDA Food Code showed items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items such as pans prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganisms can begin to grow.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing, with no date, showed allow items to thoroughly dry before unloading racks or storing items.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 8:23 A.M., showed the following:
-Eight one-quarter deep steam pans put away wet;
-Three one-eighth shallow steam pans put away wet;
-Four one-quarter deep steam pans put away wet;
-Six full steam pans put away wet;
-Two half steam pans put away wet and dripping onto the pans below them;
-Three four quart plastic containers and lids put away wet;
-Five baking sheet pans stacked and put away wet;
-Three serving trays of 16 plastic cups per tray, turned upside down on the trays wet and set out for lunch service.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/28/19, beginning at 9:53 A.M., showed the following:
-Seven dinner plates stacked in the plate warmer wet;
-Nine plate chargers stacked in the charger warmer wet;
-Four baking sheet pans stacked and put away wet;
-Two serving trays of 16 plastic cups per tray, turned upside down on the trays wet and set out for lunch service;
-DA R dried the puree machine bowl with a dish towel and then used it for the next food puree.
During an interview on 3/28/19, beginning at 9:53 A.M., DA R said:
-Dishes should always be air dried before putting them away;
-Dishes should never be dried with a towel.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 2:46 P.M., DA T said:
-Dishes should never be put away wet;
-Dishes should be air dried completely before putting them away;
-Dishes should never be dried with a towel.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said:
-Dishes should be 100% dry before being put away;
-Dishes should be air dried and never dried with a towel.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said dishes should be air dried completely before being put away.
7. Record review of the 2013 FDA Food Code showed non food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/25/19, beginning at 8:23 A.M., showed the following:
- Utensil storage drawers contained small food particles and crumbs;
-Shelving units in the dry storage goods room, the walk-in cooler, and the two walk-in freezers were covered in dust and food debris including purple jelly or jam, a thick, white, sticky liquid, and spilled juice;
-The vent hoods were covered in dust with long dust globs hanging off of them;
-The grill was covered in spilled food and debris;
-The cooktop was covered in burnt food, spilled food, and dust;
-The inside of the oven was covered in burnt food;
-The fryer oil was covered in food particles;
-The inside of the professional reach in cooler had spilled brown liquid in the bottom, the doors were covered in splashed liquids and dried foods, and the seals were covered in dust.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/27/19, beginning at 9:14 A.M., showed the following:
-Utensil storage drawers contained small food particles and crumbs;
-Shelving units in the dry storage goods room, the walk-in cooler, and the two walk-in freezers were covered in dust and food debris including purple jelly or jam, a thick, white, sticky liquid, and spilled juice;
-The vent hoods were covered in dust with long dust globs hanging off of them;
-The grill was covered in spilled food and debris;
-The cooktop was covered in burnt food, spilled food, and dust;
-The inside of the oven was covered in burnt food;
-The fryer oil was covered in food particles;
-The inside of the professional reach in cooler had spilled brown liquid in the bottom, the doors were covered in splashed liquids and dried foods, and the seals were covered in dust.
Observation of the kitchen on 3/28/19, beginning at 9:53 A.M., showed the following:
- Utensil storage drawers contained small food particles and crumbs;
-Shelving units in the dry storage goods room, the walk-in cooler, and the two walk-in freezers were covered in dust and food debris including purple jelly or jam, a thick, white, sticky liquid, and spilled juice;
-The vent hoods were covered in dust with long dust globs hanging off of them;
-The grill was covered in spilled food and debris;
-The cooktop was covered in burnt food, spilled food, and dust;
-The inside of the oven was covered in burnt food;
-The fryer oil was covered in food particles;
-The inside of the professional reach in cooler had spilled brown liquid in the bottom, the doors were covered in splashed liquids and dried foods, and the seals were covered in dust;
-The hot food transportation cart covered in spilled food and debris, it was used to transport lunch trays this way.
Observation of the kitchen on 4/1/19, beginning at 2:46 P.M., showed the following:
-Utensil storage drawers contained small food particles and crumbs;
-Shelving units in the dry storage goods room, the walk-in cooler, and the two walk-in freezers were covered in dust and food debris including purple jelly or jam, a thick, white, sticky liquid, and spilled juice;
-The vent hoods were covered in dust with long dust globs hanging off of them;
-The grill was covered in spilled food and debris;
-The cooktop was covered in burnt food, spilled food, and dust;
-The inside of the oven was covered in burnt food;
-The fryer oil was covered in food particles;
-The inside of the professional reach in cooler had spilled brown liquid in the bottom, the doors were covered in splashed liquids and dried foods, and the seals were covered in dust;
During an interview on 3/28/19, beginning at 9:53 A.M., DA R said:
-There is not set cleaning schedule;
-The utensil drawers and shelving units should be cleaned weekly;
-The vent hoods are supposed to be cleaned by maintenance and it has been about a month since they were last cleaned;
-The stove, cooktop, the grill, and the fryer should be cleaned as needed and weekly, the fryer should be skimmed at least once per shift;
-The professional reach in cooler is supposed to be cleaned weekly and as needed when something is spilled;
-The hot cart should be cleaned after every use and prior to the next serve out.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 2:46 P.M., DA T said:
-There used to be a cleaning schedule but they have not had one in several months;
-Things are not being cleaned because there isn't a schedule;
-The drawers, shelving, cooktop, oven, grill, fryer, and coolers should be cleaned weekly.
During an interview on 4/1/19, at 3:18 P.M., the kitchen supervisor said:
-There used to be a cleaning schedule, but it didn't work with how they operate the kitchen now, so it is being revised;
-The staff are supposed to clean as needed, whenever there is a spill or they see something dirty;
-The vent hoods are supposed to be cleaned by maintenance at least monthly, they were last done about a month ago;
-The cooktop, oven, grill, and fryer should be cleaned weekly, the oil should be skimmed at least once per shift, and the oil changed in the fryer weekly;
-The professional cooler, walk-in cooler, walk-in freezer, and dry goods should be cleaned weekly and as needed;
-The shelving units should be cleaned weekly, rotating through every day in one area to the next.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 11:04 A.M., the maintenance supervisor said the kitchen hood vents are supposed to be cleaned by dietary staff, maintenance has been trying to help out, but they are not being cleaned like they should be.
During an interview on 4/2/19, at 2:35 P.M., the administrator said:
-Staff are expected to follow the cleaning schedule that was created about a month ago;
-Shelving units, drawers, equipment, and coolers and freezers should be deep cleaned weekly and as needed;
-Dietary, not maintenance is responsible for cleaning the hood vents.