CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to treat six residents (Resident #2, #4, #9, #19, #37 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to treat six residents (Resident #2, #4, #9, #19, #37 and #49) with dignity and respect. Staff failed to assist one resident (Resident #2) to cover himself/herself when he/she was partially undressed in view of others and discussed the resident's situation in front of other residents and staff, failed to assist two residents (Residents # 4 and #9) to cover their catheter urine collection bags, failed to empty a urinal prior to storing it in a bathroom shared by one resident (Resident #19) and his/her roommate causing odor which led to the resident not wanting to have visitors, failed to take one resident (Resident #37) to a private area when the resident refused a medication and continued to give the resident direction in front of others, staff failed to assist one dependent resident (Resident #49) to change out of soiled clothes and to dress appropriately for the time of day. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, undated, showed each resident will be treated with consideration, respect a full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and care of his/her personal needs.
2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 6/9/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance, Need for assistance with personal care, other lack of coordination, and muscle weakness (generalized);
-Required limited one staff assistance for toileting;
-Required extensive one staff assistance for dressing and personal hygiene;
-Always incontinent of bladder.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:57 A.M., showed the resident in his/her doorway with their pants down to their knees. He/She asked Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) D for assistance as he/she passed by the resident's room. The CNA said they would help the resident, walked to the nurses station, stated in front of other staff and residents that Resident #2 was at his/her doorway with his/her pants down. Further observation showed the staff walked back toward the resident saying, why me, why me?
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said he/she would assist the resident if they requested assistance, especially if the resident was exposed with their pants were down. He/She said the staff member who noticed the resident with their pants down, should have assisted them, and not told other staff. He/She said it is not acceptable for a staff member to make comments in regard to the resident needing care.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she expects staff to help the residents, if they are partially exposed, and not announce to others the resident's situation. LPN B said staff should not talk under their breath or make remarks about helping a resident.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said if a resident asked for assistance, staff should assist the resident promptly. He/She said staff should not talk negatively about a resident or tasks.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said staff are expected to assist residents who request help without announcing the resident's needs or muttering under their breath.
3. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, retention of urine, unspecified;
-Required extensive one staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Totally dependent on one staff assistance for locomotion on and off of the unit;
-Indwelling urinary catheter.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 1:21 P.M., showed the resident in bed with his/her catheter bag hung on the bed frame with urine visibly seen from the hallway.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 9:31 A.M. showed the resident in bed with his/her catheter bag hung on the bed frame with urine visibly seen from the hallway.
4. Review of Resident #9's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of a stroke and paraplegia;
-Extensive one staff assistance for dressing and toileting;
-Indwelling urinary catheter.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:10 A.M. showed the resident in bed with his/her catheter bag hung on the bed frame with urine visibly seen from the hallway.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 1:20 P.M. showed the resident in bed with his/her catheter bag hung on the bed frame with urine visibly seen from the hallway.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 10:24 A.M. showed the resident in bed with his/her catheter bag hung on the bed frame with urine visibly seen from the hallway.
During an interview on 9/8/22 at 2:08 P.M., the resident said he/she is unable to cover his/her catheter bag.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said catheter bags should be placed in dignity bags. He/She said CNAs should ensure the residents' dignity and privacy by having the catheter bags covered.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said they are directed to ensure catheter bags are placed in privacy bags.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said the residents should have privacy bags for their catheter drainage bag and tubing, and they should be used when they are up and about. He/She said he/she did not know if the resident's had privacy bags on their beds. He/She said the CNAs are responsible for making sure catheter drainage bags are covered.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he/she expects CNAs to keep catheter bags covered.
5. Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:22 A.M., showed Resident #19's room smelled of urine, and strong urine odor lingered in the resident's bathroom. A plastic bag hung in the bathroom and contained a urinal, which had urine in it.
During an interview on 9/7/22 at 8:22 A.M., the resident said the urine smell in his/her room makes him/her feel awful and afraid for visitors to come in. He/She said it smelled bad because his/her roommate is frequently incontinent and the bathroom smells.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:18 A.M., showed the resident's room smelled of urine.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:24 A.M., showed the hallway outside of the resident's room smelled of urine.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:00 P.M., CNA H said the resident has complained to him/her before about his/her roommate going to the bathroom and not changing their clothes. He/She said the resident always complains about every little thing. He/She said urinals and bed pans are supposed to be stored in large bags and hung over the safety rails in the bathrooms. He/She said the bags are supposed to be changed every couple of days, and the urinals and bedpans are supposed to be cleaned before they are stored in the bags. He/She said he/she would get rid of the bag and get a new one if it had urine in it. He/She said if the bag had visible urine in it it could cause the room to smell.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:18 P.M., LPN P said staff had not reported to him/her that the resident's room or hallway smelled of urine. He/She said urinals and bedpans should be cleaned and stored in bags in the residents' bathrooms. He/She said urine should not be in urinals when they are placed in the storage bags. He/She said if there was urine in the bag it could cause the room to smell like urine.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said staff should address offensive room odors as they are noticed.
6. Review of Resident #37's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene;
-Did not reject care.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:11 A.M., through 11:23 A.M., showed an unidentified staff member, in a hallway with other residents around, attempted to get Resident #37 to swallow a pill, even though the resident had refused it. The staff member repeated, swallow the pill, swallow, and swallow it. Further observation, showed another staff member came over to assist and both staff members took the resident to the Spa room, so the resident could spit the pill out.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said if a resident refused care it should be reported to the charge nurse, so they can see if someone else could encourage the resident. He/She said he/she would come back later to see if the resident had changed their mind.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said if a resident refused a medication, they should be taken to a private area to see if they would like to spit it out. He/She said staff should not stand over the resident and repeatedly tell them to swallow their medicine.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said if a resident was holding medications in their mouth the resident should be encouraged to swallow them by giving them a drink or a bite to eat, and if that did not work, ask the resident to spit it out.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said if a resident refuses care such as medications, staff should encourage them to swallow the medication, offer a drink or bite of food, or encourage them to spit it out. He/She said it could be seen as undignified if staff persisted to tell the resident to swallow medications.
7. Review of Resident #49's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Moderately Cognitively Impaired;
-Totally dependent on two staff members for dressing;
-Required the supervision of one staff member for eating;
-Had diagnoses of stroke;
-Did not reject care.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:43 A.M., showed Resident #49 had a yellow substance on his/her nightgown and blanket.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 2:44 P.M., showed the resident continued to wear the same stained nightgown. The resident's clothes had not been changed.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:05 P.M., CNA H said if staff see food on a resident's clothes or blankets they should wipe it off. They said if the resident still looked sloppy they should change their clothes. He/She said it's a dignity issue if it's not cleaned up.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:21 P.M., LPN P said he/she expects residents to be dressed in clothes other than a nightgown during the day, unless staff has been directed otherwise. LPN P said if a resident's clothes had food on them he/she would expect staff to clean them, and if they couldn't he/she would expect them to change the resident's clothes.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said residents should have their clothing changed if soiled.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to ensure resident's personal information was protected when they left the Medication Administration Records (MARs) open and unattended in pub...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to ensure resident's personal information was protected when they left the Medication Administration Records (MARs) open and unattended in public hallways for eight residents (Residents #2, #4, #16, #25, #26, #28, #33, and #46). The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, undated, showed each resident will be treated with consideration, respect a full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and care of his/her personal needs.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:23 A.M. showed Certified Medication Aide (CMT) C left the medication cart unattended with resident #4's MAR displayed. Further observation showed two staff members and one resident passed by the medication cart with Resident #4's information displayed.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:26 A.M. showed CMT C left the medication cart unattended with resident #16's MAR displayed. Further observation showed three staff members and two residents passed the medication cart with Resident #16's information displayed.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:18 A.M., showed the MAR open and unattended on the 300 hall hallway. The MAR displayed eight residents' (Resident #2, #4, #16, #25, #26, #28, #33, and #46) information. Further observation showed one resident sat in the area with the information displayed.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:32 A.M., showed (Certified Nurse Aide) CNA/CMT J left the MAR open and unattended, at the north nurses' station, with resident information displayed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse said when staff walk away from the medication cart, staff must maintain privacy by locking the medication cart with everything on the cart put away, and the computer screen should be put down or the walk away button should be pushed. Further, the MDS Nurse said if a medication cart was left open or the MAR open on the computer screen, he/she would correct the situation immediately and then pull aside the staff responsible for the medication cart for re-education.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said the CNAs are directed to make sure the medication or treatment carts are locked before leaving them unattended and to lock the screens, so the residents information is not visible to others.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Piratical Nurse (LPN) B said staff are expected to clear the top of the medication cart, lock it, and close down the screen before the cart is left unattended. He/She said he/she would lock the cart and close the screen if he/she found a cart unattended with resident information displayed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said staff are expected to close the screen before leaving a treatment or medication cart unattended so resident information is not exposed.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Facility st...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Facility staff failed to maintain resident rooms and restrooms free of chipped paint and holes in the walls. Facility staff failed to maintain resident restrooms free of floor discolorations and missing bolt covers and caulk. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the policies provided by staff showed staff did not provide a Facility Maintenance Policy.
2. Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:49 A.M., showed Resident #62's room had chipped paint and a hole in the wall behind the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:07 A.M., showed resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had an area of chipped paint and multiple holes in the wall.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:37 P.M., showed resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had several areas of chipped paint and large holes in the wall.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:18 A.M., showed resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had an area of chipped paint and multiple holes in the wall.
During an interview on 9/6/22 at 1:37 P.M., the resident said the facility is aware of the issues, and his/her family had been told they would not fix the holes until he/she moved out.
3. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:42 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:32 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:12 P.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 9:44 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
4. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:45 A.M., showed the restroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rust discoloration on the floor and missing caulk around the base of the toilet.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:18 A.M., showed the restroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rust discoloration on the floor and missing caulk around the base of the toilet.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:13 P.M., showed the restroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rust discoloration on the floor and missing caulk around the base of the toilet.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 9:44 A.M., showed the restroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] had a rust discoloration on the floor and missing caulk around the base of the toilet.
5. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:48 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:37 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:13 P.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 9:45 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
6. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:42 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:41 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:13 P.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 9:44 A.M., showed the restroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a rust discoloration on the floor around the base of the toilet and uncovered toilet bolts.
7. During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:11 P.M., Housekeeper F said chipped paint or gouges in the walls should be reported to the maintenance staff. Housekeeper F said he/she had tried to get the rust stains around the toilets out, but was not able. He/She said he/she had not reported this to the maintenance department.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:25 A.M., the Maintenance Director said if there were problems for the maintenance department to address, staff fills out a work order and leaves it at the nurses' station and maintenance staff checks for these every morning. He/She said if walls had chipped paint or gouges and it was determined the cause was a repetitive issue such as electric wheelchairs or headboards bumping the repairs were postponed until the resident no longer lived in the room. The Maintenance Director said discoloration on the floor around the toilets were the responsibility of the housekeeping department.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse, (the nurse responsible for maintaining a federally mandated assessment tool), said staff should fill out a maintenance slip if a maintenance issue is noted, and the maintenance department is responsible for addressing the problem. The MDS nurse said if a resident has marred walls and it was determined the resident would continue to mar the same area, wall repairs are made after the resident no longer uses that room.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said all staff are responsible for reporting issues. He/She said the aides report issues to the nurse, who fill out a maintenance slip. He/She said the maintenance department is responsible for fixing the issues. He/She said he/she did not know of any environmental issues.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she has not noticed any holes in the walls, chipped paint, or rust and discoloration around the base of toilets in resident's bathrooms. He/She said they have a desk pin they put notes on for maintenance to go through daily.
During an interview on 9/6/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said if staff is aware of any issues in the rooms, there are maintenance slips at the nurses' station to write any concerns on. He/she said maintenance checks the slips every day. He/She was not aware of any issues or holes in the wall.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said they do not have a policy on reporting maintenance issues but staff are directed to fill out a maintenance slip located at each nursing station with issues observed such as chipped paint, holes in drywall or rusty/dirty areas in patient rooms. He/she said maintenance looks at those slips every day and corrects the problem or contracts out the issue if needed. The DON said if the chipped paint or holes in the wall are near resident beds, the facility does not fix the issues until the resident is discharged or moved out of the room.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four residents (Resident #21, #41, #48, & #58) to meet their medical and nursing needs. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's care plan policy, dated March 2015, showed:
-The interdisciplinary care plan team with input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain;
-The comprehensive care plan will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the Minimum Data Set;
-Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition;
-The interdisciplinary care plan team is responsible for the periodic review and updating of care plans when a significant change in the resident's condition has occurred, at least quarterly, and when changes occur that impact the resident's care (i.e. change in diet, discontinuation of therapy, changes in care areas that do not require a significant change assessment).
2. Review of Resident #21's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/8/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for transfers, and toileting;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for dressing;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for eating and personal hygiene;
-Did not reject care.
Review of the resident's care plan, dated 7/18/22, showed staff documented the resident required assistance from one to two staff members for ADLs. Further review showed it did not contain direction in regard to the resident's facial hair preferences.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 12:31 P.M., showed the resident had hair on his/her upper lip.
Observations on 9/12/22 at 12:46 P.M., showed the resident had hair on his/her upper lip.
3. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Moderate cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene;
-Did not refuse care.
Review of the care plan, dated 8/4/22, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to the resident's facial hair and nail preferences.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:55 A.M., showed the resident had long nails that varied in length and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:37 A.M., showed the resident had long nails that varied in length and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 1:46 P.M., showed the resident had long that varied in length and hair above his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/12/22 at 12:39 P.M., showed the resident had long that varied in length and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
During an interview on 9/6/22 at 10:55 A.M., the resident said he/she asked the staff to cut his/her nails, but was told his/her nails were short enough.
4. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for dressing, eating and personal hygiene;
-Did not refuse care.
Review of the resident's care plan, dated, 8/7/22, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to the resident's facial hair preference.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:36 P.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 2:12 P.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:48 A.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 8:41 A.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
5. Review of Resident #58's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively impaired;
-Had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Dementia (progressive disease of the brain that causes memory and cognitive impairment), Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Lack of Coordination, and Unsteady on Feet;
-Required one staff physical assistance for transfers;
-Dependent on one staff for locomotion.
Review of the resident's Device Assessment, dated 8/26/22, showed staff documented the resident used a geri-chair used for positioning.
Review of the resident's care plan, reviewed 8/29/22, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to geri-chair (padded chair designed to help seniors with limited mobility) use for the resident.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:18 A.M., showed the resident sat reclined in a geri-chair in the activity room.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:37 A.M., showed the resident sat reclined in a geri-chair next to the nurses station.
6. During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said care plans should be updated within one day of receipt of a new order. Care plans should address transfers, mobility, eating, diet and nutrition, code status, wounds, oxygen use, catheter presence and care, incontinence, use of psychotropic medications, bedrails, individualized chairs and splints. He/She said when their sister facility shut down and they received those residents it was a lot to take on. He/She said they could not keep on the resident's care plans. He/She said skin problems were not usually covered in the care plan unless it was a chronic issue, such as a wound. He/She said resident preferences such as facial hair were not listed on the care plan.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she did not know how often the care plan and MDS are updated. He/She said he/she tells the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), or the MDS Nurse if any changes to the care plan are needed. He/She said he/she would expect catheters, oxygen use, splints, transfers, specialized chairs, and wound care to be listed on the care plan. He/She said he/she would also expect skin treatments and care listed on the care plan. LPN B said he/she expects care plans to be updated with order changes. He/She would expect facial hair to be addressed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the staff communicate changes through paper communication at the desks and the care plan is left for the DON or administration to update. He/she said care plans should be updated daily with changes, and they should address splints and contracture management, use of positioning devices such as geri-chairs, catheter use, restorative therapy. He/she said facial hair and nail care were not added to the care plan since the residents often change their minds. He/she said he/she would expect the CNA's to ask the residents if they want to be shaved, and if the resident has poor cognition, he/she would expect staff to find out their preferences with the family.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide professional standards of care when they fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide professional standards of care when they failed to assess and document the clinical status of two wounds on a routine basis to monitor for improvement or decline in the areas for one resident (Resident #62). Failed to prepare insulin as directed by the manufacturer for one resident (Resident #33), and failed to ensure three residents (Residents #49, #61, and #51), who received oxygen, had their tubing and canisters labeled. Additionally facility staff failed to notify the physician for one resident (Resident #51), who had a fall and failed to provide contracture management for two residents (Resident #48 and #53). The facility census was 63.
1. During an interview, the (Director of Nursing) DON said they did not have a wound assessment policy.
2. Review of Resident #62's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 5/24/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively Intact;
-Required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for transfers;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for toilet use;
-Used a walker and a wheelchair;
-Occasionally incontinent of bladder;
-Had diagnoses of heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol);
-At risk for pressure ulcers;
-Had no unhealed pressure ulcers at Stage 1 or higher;
-Had no open lesion(s) on the foot;
-Did not receive pressure ulcer care;
-Did not use pressure reducing device for chair or bed.
Review of the resident's nurses' notes, dated July 2022 to September 2022, showed staff documented:
-7/4/22 at 1:19 P.M., First assessed a quarter size soft discolored area to right heel, treatment of skin-prep (protective barrier) started, and to float heels;
-7/9/22 at 1:00 P.M., Right heel soft area;
-7/10/22 at 7:18 P.M., Explained treatment orders and received optifoam (foam dressing) to heel one time a day and skin-prep;
-7/19/22 at 9:01 P.M. Small open area to buttock. Staff did not document they notified the NP or physician of the newly identified wound;
-7/20/22 at 12:34 A.M., Treatment continues to small blackened area to Right heel;
Review showed staff did not document further in regard to the right heel or buttock wounds.
Review of the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) G Note, dated 7/11/22, showed:
-Chief complaint: Foot ulcers;
-Pressure Injury of skin of heel, unspecified injury stage, unspecified;
-Right heel intact blister;
-Right heel blister without evidence of surrounding infection - will skin-prep daily with goal of keeping blister intact;
-Continue boots to float heels.
Review of the Wound Management Detail Reports, dated July 2022 to September 2022, showed staff did not complete an initial or weekly assessment of the areas to the resident's buttock or right heel to assess improvement or decline in areas such as size, depth, drainage, and pain.
Review of the resident's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Mild Cognitive Impairment;
-Required limited assistance of one person physical assistance with bed mobility;
-Required extensive assistance of one person physical assistance with transfers;
-History of heart failure, hypertension, PVD (peripheral vascular disease, circulation illness affecting lower extremities), hyperlipidemia;
-Was at risk for pressure ulcers;
-No unhealed pressure ulcers;
-Other open lesion(s) on the foot;
-Used pressure reducing device for chair and bed, and application of dressing to feet;
-Received Hospice services.
Review of the resident's care plan, updated 8/25/22, showed staff were directed to:
-Consider postural alignment, weight distribution, balance stability, and pressure relief when positioning in chair or wheelchair;
-Skin assessment and inspection every shift with close attention to heels;
-Examine skin during bathing for signs and symptoms of breakdown, report any breakdown immediately to charge nurse;
-Review showed it did not address the resident's wound to his/her buttock staff identified on 7/19/22.
Review of the POS, dated 09/01/22-09/06/22, showed the resident's physician directed staff to apply skin prep to the right heel discolored soft area once a day until healed.
Observation on 9/06/22 at 10:49 A.M., showed the resident rested on an air mattress (pressure-relieving to provide high levels of support for the body and the head and thus relieve any pressure point stress) with bilateral heel boots on. Multiple brown spots were seen on the bed sheet around the feet, and a foul odor lingered at the end of the bed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said skin assessments should be completed once a week and the aides are supposed to let the nurses know if a resident has a new or worsening area in between time. He/She said it is the expectation of the staff to contact the doctor and follow up with orders and treatments. He/She said the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) measures the residents wounds and all areas of concern. He/She did not know where the wound documentation would be located.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he/she believed there was poor documentation regarding the resident's skin. He/she said it is the responsibility of the nursing staff to run a weekly report on all the wounds and lay eyes on everything the facility is doing for wounds. He/she said if the treatments are not appropriate or if something is deteriorating a communication form would be filled out and sent to the physician regarding changes in the wound and the staff would follow the physician's direction/orders. The DON said if the wound is not open or boggy, then the treatments are effective and staff would not need to document on them weekly and continue the treatment. He/she said if the wound opens a weekly skin assessment would be documented until the wound heals. He/She said the nurse or whomever finds the wound would initiate a skin assessment and treatment and the following business day the he/she would evaluate it, and initiate a wound order or treatment.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:23 P.M., LPN P said if a resident has a wound it should be reported to the nurse and the nurse should document the measurements and wound characteristics. He/She said wound documentation should be completed by the nurse who the wound is reported to. He/She said he/she did not know why wound documentation would not be done.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:28 P.M., the DON said the resident did not have a wound on his/her right heel. He/She said if there was discoloration he/she would have expected the nurses to obtain a treatment and document the area in the progress notes. He/She said pressure ulcer documentation should include the stage of the wound, measurements, drainage, odor, tissue type, treatment and whether or not the wound was improving. He/She said he/she would not expect a pressure ulcer assessment for the right heel wound. He/She said he/she, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the the MDS Coordinator complete the wound assessments.
3. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, dated March 2015, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to insulin administration.
Review of Resident #33's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 8/10/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe Cognitive Impairment;
-Short and long term memory problems;
-Diagnoses of diabetes mellitus.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 9:36 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) J did not prime the resident's insulin pen before he/she administered the resident's insulin.
During an interview on 9/8/22 at 9:40 A.M., CMT J said he/she does not prime insulin pens before he/she administers insulin to the residents. He/She said the only time he/she primes an insulin pen is when it's new.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she did not know when an insulin pen should be primed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said nursing staff are directed to prime the insulin pens and waste the primed amount. He/She said then they should dial the correct dosage and inject the medication.
4. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose is to administer oxygen to the resident when insufficient oxygen is being carried by the blood to the tissues and directs staff to:
-Label humidifier with date and time opened;
-Change humidifier and tubing per cleaning guidelines;
-Check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing and cannulas at regular intervals.
5. Review of Resident #49's Physician Order Summary (POS), dated September 2022, showed:
-1/28/22: Oxygen tubing to be changed monthly if in use as needed (PRN).
Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed it did not contain documentation staff changed, labeled or dated the resident's oxygen tubing.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:59 A.M., showed Resident #49 had oxygen on at 2.5 Liters Per Minute (LPM). The oxygen tubing was not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:40 P.M., showed Resident #49 laid in bed. He/She wore his/her oxygen at 2.5 LPM. The oxygen tubing was not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:43 A.M., showed Resident #49 sat in his/her wheelchair. He/She wore his/her oxygen at 2.5 LPM. The oxygen tubing was not labeled or dated.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said the oxygen tubing is changed by the nurses twice a month and it should be labeled with the staff's initials and date it was changed.
6. Review of Resident #61's 5-day MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the residents as:
-Cognitively impaired;
-Had diagnoses of Respiratory failure (lungs fail to get enough oxygen to the blood), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Osteomyelitis (infection or inflammation to the bone or bone marrow), and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (condition that affects the hearts ability to pump blood);
-Had shortness of breath with exertion;
-Received oxygen therapy;
Review of the resident's POS, dated 8/19/22, showed an order for oxygen at 2 LPM to be delivered via nasal cannula (NC) continuously. Further review of the orders showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to when to change the oxygen tubing or humidifier.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:42 P.M., showed the resident in bed with oxygen in place via nasal cannula at 2 LPM. The oxygen tubing and humidifier were not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:10 A.M., showed the resident in his/her wheelchair with oxygen in place via NC at 2 LPM. The oxygen tubing and humidifier were not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:32 A.M., showed the resident in his/her wheelchair with oxygen in place via nasal cannula at 2 LPM. The oxygen tubing and humidifier were not labeled or dated.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said oxygen tubing should be changed monthly on the evening shift by nursing staff. He/she said he/she did not know when the tubing or humidifiers were last changed for resident #51 or #61. He/she did not know there was not an order to change the tubing for resident #61. The DON said anyone that is trained to use oxygen can direct residents on the use of oxygen and adjust the flow.
7. Review of Resident #51's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, and dressing;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for transfers and toileting;
-Required limited assistance from one staff member for eating;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene;
-Did not use oxygen;
-Did not refuse care.
Review of the resident's care plan, dated 8/10/22, showed staff assessed the resident was at risk for falls due to significant debility and very poor weight bearing, with a fall documented on 8/10/22. Further review, showed staff are directed to report all falls to the physician.
Review of the progress notes, dated 8/10/22 through 8/11/22, showed they did not contain documentation that staff notified the physician of the resident's fall.
Review of the POS, dated 1/31/22, showed an order for oxygen at 2-5 LPM per NC PRN for shortness of breath.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:43 P.M., showed the resident wore oxygen. Further observation, showed the oxygen tubing and the humidifier bottle were not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/07/22 at 2:11 P.M., showed the resident's oxygen tubing and humidifier were not labeled or dated.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 2:09 P.M., showed the resident's oxygen tubing and humidifier were not labeled or dated.
8. During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said oxygen should be included on the physician's orders, as well as when to change the tubing. He/She said oxygen tubing should be changed two times per month, as well as labeled with the staff's initials of whoever changed it out, and the date. He/She said the nurses are responsible for changing the tubing. He/She said humidifiers should be checked every shift by the aides and they're responsible for changing the humidifiers. He/She said it is the nurses responsibility to make sure both items are changed. He/She said it is the nurses responsibility to make sure residents are wearing their oxygen as they should. If a resident refuses or continually takes their oxygen off, he/she would try different approaches and contact the doctor.
During an interview on 9/22/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said he/she expects staff to notify the physician if a resident falls. He/she said he/she did not know if the physician was notified when resident #51 fell. They said nursing should change the oxygen tubing, and it should be changed monthly on the evening shift. He/she did not know when the tubing or humidifiers were last changed.
9. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the residents as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for dressing, eating and personal hygiene;
-Did not receive restorative care or therapy services during the look back period;
-Did not refuse care.
Review of the resident's care plan, dated 8/7/22, showed staff documented the resident had osteoarthritic contractures in both upper and lower extremities.
Review of the POS, undated, showed it did not contain an order for therapy or restorative care services.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:36 P.M., showed the resident hands were contracted.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:23 A.M., showed the resident hands were contracted.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:48 A.M.,showed the resident hands were contracted.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 8:41 A.M., showed the resident hands were contracted.
During an interview on 9/9/22 at 9:13 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) H said there is no restorative care orders for the resident's contracted hands, but he/she was going to contact the nurse practitioner to address the hands. He/She said the resident was admitted to the facility with his/her hands being contracted.
10. Review of Resident #53's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively Intact;
-Had diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy (disorder affecting movement, muscle tone and balance) and Seizures (sudden, uncontrolled disturbance in the brain causing changes in behavior, movements, feelings and consciousness);
-Required one staff physical assistance for dressing;
-Had not received restorative services in the look-back period.
Review of the resident's POS, dated 8/8/22 through 9/8/22 showed it did not contain an order for a right hand splint.
Review of the resident's care plan, reviewed 8/17/22, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to a right hand splint for the resident.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:15 A.M., showed the resident wore a splint to their right hand.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:16 A.M., showed the resident wore a splint to their right hand.
11. During an interview on 9/9/22 at 12:59 A.M., the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) said the restorative program stopped due to Covid-19. He/She said they are restarting the program.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Residents #11, #21, #41, #48 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure five residents (Residents #11, #21, #41, #48 and #62), that were unable to complete their own activities of daily living (ADL), received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Shaving the Resident Policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose is to remove facial hair and improve the resident's appearance and morale.
Review of the facility's Nails, Care of (Finger and Toes) Policy, dated March 2015, showed:
-The purpose is to provide cleanliness, comfort, and prevent the spread of infection;
-The nursing assistants may perform nail care on the residents who are not at risk for complications of infection. The licensed nurse or podiatrist must perform nail care on residents suffering from diabetes or vascular disease.
2. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 7/3/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene and bathing;
-Did not refuse care.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:00 A.M., showed the resident had long hairs on his/her chin.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:37 P.M., showed the resident had long hairs on his/her chin.
3. Review of Resident #21's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for toileting;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for dressing;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene;
-Did not reject care.
Observation on 9/06/22 at 12:31 P.M., showed the resident had hair on his/her upper lip.
Observation on 9/12/22 at 12:46 P.M., showed the resident had hair on his/her upper lip.
4. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Moderate cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene;
-Did not refuse care.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:55 A.M., showed the resident had long nails with varied lengths and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:37 A.M., showed the resident had long nails with varied lengths and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 1:46 P.M., showed the resident had long nails with varied lengths and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/12/22 at 12:39 P.M., showed the resident had long nails with various lengths and hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
During an interview on 9/6/22 at 10:55 A.M., the resident said he/she asked the staff to cut his/her nails, but was told his/her nails were short enough.
5. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severe cognitive impairment;
-Required total assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting;
-Required total assistance from one staff member for dressing, eating and personal hygiene;
-Did not refuse care.
Review of the care plan, dated, 8/7/22, showed staff documented the resident had osteoarthritic contractures in both upper and lower extremities.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:36 P.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 2:12 P.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:48 A.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 8:41 A.M., showed the resident had facial hair on his/her upper lip and chin.
6. Review of Resident #62's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Mild cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting and personal hygiene;
-Did not refuse care.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:49 A.M. showed resident had long hairs on his/her upper lip, chin, and neck.
7. During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said the aides are responsible for nail care and shaving, unless the resident is a diabetic. He/She said the residents nails and facial hair should be addressed during showers.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said all staff should check for long facial hair and nails. He/She said the nurses are responsible for trimming the nails of the diabetic residents and aides are responsible for trimming all the other resident's nails. He/She said residents should be shaved on shower days and as needed by the aides.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the CNAs are responsible to ensure shaving and nail care is completed during showers unless the resident is diabetic. He/She said if the resident is a diabetic, nail care is completed by the nurses.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards when staff failed to properly store environmental hazards, failed to properly propel three residents (Resident #6, #28, and #59) in wheelchairs in a manner to prevent accidents, and failed to use the Hoyer lift (an assistive device used to help transfer residents between a bed and chair) in a manner to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility policy and procedure manual showed they did not have a policy for hazardous chemical storage, or sharps storage for razors, toenail clippers, scissors, or sewing pins.
2. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:19 A.M., showed the 300 hall Spa unlocked and unattended with a plugged in hairdryer draped over a paper towel holder. The hairdryer cord hung in the sink, under the faucet. In addition, observation showed an unlocked and unattended cabinet that contained:
-An open bottle of Complete TB (cleaning solution) labeled, Call poison control if ingested;
-An open bottle of [NAME] Triple (Disinfectant) labeled, Harmful if inhaled; and
-One unprotected disposable razor.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:55 A.M., showed the 300 hall Spa unlocked and unattended with a plugged in hairdryer draped over a paper towel holder. The hairdryer cord hung in the sink, under the faucet. In addition, observation showed an unlocked and unattended cabinet that contained:
-An open bottle of Complete TB labeled, Call poison control if ingested;
-An open bottle of [NAME] Triple labeled, Harmful if inhaled; and
-One unprotected disposable razor.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:15 A.M., showed a hair dryer in the bowl of a sink in the spa located near the Physical Documentation Room. Further observation showed the hair dryer plugged into a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFI/GFCI, a type of outlet which precisely monitors the balance of electrical current moving through a circuit. If the power goes where it shouldn't, like in a short, the GFCI immediately cuts off the electricity) and water dripped from the faucet onto the hair dryer.
During an interview on 9/7/22 at 10:16 A.M., the maintenance director said the hair dryer should not be stored in the sink due to the potential for electrical shock. He said staff should not count on the GFCI outlet to protect them from shock, because you cannot always count on a GFCI to work. The maintenance director said the spa is not locked, and residents have access to the room. He did not know if staff have received training on sources of electrical shock, but staff and residents should know better than to leave a hair dry in the sink.
3. Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:29 A.M., showed the Beauty shop door open, unlocked, and unattended. A sign hung on the door that said Do not lock salon door. Additional observation showed a bottle of Pure Hard Surface (A disinfectant) on the counter labeled Contact poison control if ingested.
4. Observation on 9/6/22 at 12:07 P.M., showed the north clean linen closet unlocked and unattended. Additional observation showed:
-A disposable razor
-45 denture cleansing tablets labeled, Contact poison control immediately if ingested.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:00 A.M., showed the north Clean Linen Closet unlocked and unattended. Additional observation showed:
-A disposable razor
-45 denture cleansing tablets labeled, Contact poison control immediately if ingested.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:46 A.M., showed the north Clean Linen Closet unlocked and unattended. Additional observation showed:
-A can of Airwick Fresh Everyday Fresh Scent 24/7 Pet Odor Neutralization labeled, Contact poison control if ingested.
-42 denture cleansing tablets labeled, Contact poison control immediately if ingested.
5. Observation on 9/7/22 at 2:46 P.M., showed the 100 hall north Spa unlocked and unattended with a loose hand rail on the left side of the toilet. Additional observation, showed an unlocked and unattended cabinet that contained:
-8 disposable razors;
-An open bottle of [NAME] Triple labeled, Harmful if inhaled.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:30 A.M., showed the 100 Hall North Spa unlocked and unattended that contained a loose hand rail on the left side of the toilet and an unlocked and unattended cabinet.
6. Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:36 P.M., showed the South Hall Spa in the hallway unlocked and unattended with a cabinet with a sign on it stating These Cabinets Must Remain Locked which was unlocked and unattended. Items inside the cabinet included:
-2 hand held hair dryers;
-1 curling iron;
-A box of sharps with 2 unprotected razors on top of the lid;
-A jar of Petroleum Jelly labeled, Keep out of reach of children, do not get in eyes;
-A tube of Antifungal Cream labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control;
-A tube of Smooth and Cool Protectant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control.
-A zippered container sitting on a chair which contained Toning Glow labeled Keep of reach of children, disposable gloves recommended, wash thoroughly after use.
-A jug of Soothe and Cool Cleanse with a pump labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:22 A.M., showed the South Hall Spa in the hallway unlocked and unattended with a cabinet unlocked and unattended. Items inside the cabinet included:
-2 hand held hair dryers;
-A curling iron;
-A box of sharps with 2 unprotected razors on top of the lid;
-A jar of Petroleum Jelly labeled, Keep out of reach of children, do not get in eyes;
-A tube of Antifungal Cream labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control;
-A tube of Smooth and Cool Protectant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control';
-A jug of Soothe and Cool Cleanse with a pump labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 12:12 P.M., showed the South Hall Spa in the hallway unlocked and unattended with a cabinet unlocked and unattended. Items inside the cabinet included:
-2 hand held hair dryers;
-A curling iron;
-A box of sharps with 2 unprotected razors on top of the lid;
-A jar of Petroleum Jelly labeled, Keep out of reach of children, do not get in eyes;
-A tube of Antifungal Cream labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control;
-A tube of Smooth and Cool Protectant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control';
-A jug of Soothe and Cool Cleanse with a pump labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes.
7. Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:48 P.M., showed the South Hall Spa near the nurses' station unlocked and unattended with a cabinet unlocked and unattended. Items inside the cabinet included:
-A tube of Antifungal Cream labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control;
-A tube of Smooth and Cool Protectant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control';
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:23 A.M., showed the South Hall Spa near the nurses' station unlocked and unattended with a cabinet unlocked and unattended. Items inside the cabinet included:
-A tube of Antifungal Cream labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control;
-A tube of Smooth and Cool Protectant labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison control.
8. Observation on 9/6/22 at 2:00 P.M., showed the South Clean Linen Closet unlocked and unattended with the shelves and floor with the following supplies:
-A box of toe nail clippers;
-A box of Denture Clean Tablets labeled, Do not put in mouth. Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact professional help or contact poison control';
-6 boxes of 50 razors;
-4 bottles of Mouthwash labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison center;
-6 bottles of Sooth and Cool Cleanser, labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes;
-A box on the floor containing multiple items including items mentioned above.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 10:24 A.M., the South Clean Linen Closet unlocked and unattended with the shelves and floor with the following supplies:
-A box of toe nail clippers;
-A box of Denture Clean Tablets labeled, Do not put in mouth. Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact professional help or contact poison control';
-6 boxes of 50 razors;
-4 bottles of Mouthwash labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison center;
-6 bottles of Sooth and Cool Cleanser, labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes;
-A box on the floor containing multiple items including items mentioned above.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 2:12 P.M., showed the South Clean Linen Closet unlocked and unattended with the shelves and floor with the following supplies:
-A box of Denture Clean Tablets labeled, Do not put in mouth. Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact professional help or contact poison control';
-5 bottles of Mouthwash labeled, Keep out of reach of children, if swallowed contact medical help or contact poison center;
-6 bottles of Sooth and Cool Cleanser, labeled For external use only, avoid contact with eyes;
-A box on the floor containing multiple items including items mentioned above.
9. Observation an unattended treatment cart located at the North Nurses Station,
on 9/6/22 at 12:04 P.M., showed two closed Nystatin (treats fungal or yeast infections of the skin) 100,000 units/gram powders, and one opened Nystatin 100,000 units/gram powder lay on top of the cart.
10. Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:18 A.M., showed Salonpas Lidocaine patches (for pain relief) on top of an unattended medication cart in 300 hallway.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse, (the nurse responsible for maintaining a federally mandated assessment tool), said CNAs should check shower rooms for safety throughout their shift, and charge nurses are encouraged to inspect the shower rooms at the beginning of their shifts. If items are found in the spa rooms that are not supposed to be out, staff should immediately put those items away. He/She said razors should be kept in a locked cabinet and a sharps container should be in the cabinet as well. The MDS Nurse said any poison or toxic chemicals should be out of reach of the residents. The Clean Linen closet should not have hazardous items in the closet.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said razors are locked in a cabinet. He/She said all staff are responsible for checking the shower room when in there. He/She said if staff notice razors or other dangerous items laid out, then they would properly dispose of the items. He/She said there is no lock on the shower room doors.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she does not know how often the shower rooms are inspected and said the CNAs are to check the spa rooms every shift. Said he/she would put sharps and chemicals back in the locked cabinet. He/She said the spa rooms are not locked but the cabinets should be locked. He/She said the clean linen supply stays unlocked and chemicals are not stored in linen closet. He/She said chemicals are supposed to be locked up and out of reach of residents.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:52 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated hazardous chemicals should be out of reach and in a locked cabinet.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said the CNA's should check the shower rooms daily throughout their shift for hazards including razors and chemicals and encouraged the charge nurses to check them at the top of their shift but he/she said they do not do it. He/she expects if sharps or other hazards are found the staff are to secure them in a locked area including the cabinet in the shower room. He/she was not aware the cabinet in he shower room was left unlocked.
11. Review of Resident #29's Five Day Scheduled Assessment MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 8/3/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers.
Review of Resident #10 Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as severely cognitively impaired.
Resident #10 shared a room with Resident #29.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:32 A.M., showed sewing pins and a pair of large scissors lay unattended on the table in the residents' room.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:30 P.M., showed Resident #29 used sewing pins and a pair of large scissors lay on the table in his/her room.
Observations on 9/7/22 at 8:25 A.M., showed sewing pins and a pair of large scissors lay unattended on the table in the resident's room.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:52 P.M., showed sewing pins and a pair of large scissors lay unattended on the table in the resident's room.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 8:43 A.M., showed sewing pins and a pair of large scissors lay on the table in the resident's room.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said he/she did not know the resident had stick pins and scissors out in the room, and was not sure if the items should be put away or not. He/She was not sure how the other residents are kept safe if they wandered into the resident's room.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said residents with sharp objects in their rooms should be educated on storage of those objects when not in use. He/She said there are not measures in place which he/she knows of to ensure other residents do not take items.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said residents may have items such as scissors and or stick pens in their room depending on the orientation of the resident.
12. Review of the facility's Wheelchair, Use of policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose is to provide mobility for the non-ambulatory resident with safety and comfort and directed staff to:
-Lower footrests and place resident's feet on footrests if used;
-Position feet and legs in good body alignment;
-Elevate leg(s) as ordered.
13. Review of Resident #6's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
- Cognitively intact;
- Independent for locomotion on and off of the unit;
- Wheelchair used as an assistive device.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:07 A.M. showed Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) H propelled Resident #6 from the entrance, past the nurses station, and down 300 hall without foot pedals.
14. Review of Resident #28's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
- Cognitively intact;
- Diagnoses of osteoarthritis, unspecified site, urinary tract infection (UTI), and open wound to right foot;
- Independent without staff assistance for locomotion on the unit;
- Required extensive assistance from one staff for locomotion off the unit;
- Wheelchair used as an assistive device.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:20 A.M. showed an unidentified staff propelled the resident from the dining room to 300 hall without a foot pedal on the left side of the resident's wheelchair. The resident's foot skimmed the ground a few times and he/she could not elevate his/her foot well.
15. Observation on 9/08/22 at 11:40 P.M., showed CNA wheeled Resident #59 in his/her wheelchair from the nurses' station to the dining room. The wheelchair did not have foot pedals.
During an interview on 9/9/22 at 11:54 A.M., CNA M said staff are instructed to make sure residents' feet are up on pedals before propelling them in a wheelchair.
During an interview on 9/9/22 at 12:12 P.M., CNA N said staff should make sure foot pedals are on wheelchairs before propelling a resident.
During an interview on 9/9/22 at 12:26 P.M., RN O said staff should only propel residents in wheelchairs when the pedals are on and the residents' feet are on them.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., CMT L said wheelchairs should all have foot pedals on before staff are to propel them.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Nurse said staff should ensure residents are using the foot pedals on their wheelchairs before being propelled. If the resident refuses foot pedals, they should be encouraged to self-propel with their feet. When residents refuse foot pedals and need staff to propel the chair, the last resort could be pulling them backwards, or the CNA would go extremely slow and residents would be asked to hold up their feet.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said staff are directed to use foot pedals when propelling residents in wheelchairs. He/she said staff was instructed about two months ago regarding propelling without pedals.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M. LPN B said he/she said staff are to make sure foot pedals are on and positioned correctly if a resident is propelled in their wheelchair. He/She said he/she has been in-serviced on foot pedals and wheelchair use about three months ago. He/She said if resident refused to use foot pedals and still wanted staff to propel them, he/she would reeducate the resident and get with DON or whomever is in charge.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said staff are expected to make sure the foot pedals are on the wheelchair and the residents feet are elevated on them when propelling residents.
16. Review of the facility's Hydraulic lift (Hoyer Lift) Policy, undated, showed:
-Purpose: To enable one individual to lift and move a resident safely;
-Open lift to widest point and set brakes;
-Position resident comfortably.
Review of the Invacare Reliant 450 RPL450-2 (Hoyer Lift) Owner's Manual, dated 2018, showed the Hoyer lift legs must be in the maximum opened/locked position for optimum stability and safety.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:08 A.M., showed Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) H and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I transferred Resident #1 with a Hoyer lift. Additional observation, showed staff did not open the legs of the lift when they transferred the resident.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:14 P.M., LPN P said he/ she would expect staff to extend the legs of the Hoyer for all transfers.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:28 P.M., the DON said he/ she would expect the legs of the Hoyer to be spread for safety during movement.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to assess six residents (Resident #2, #14, #26, #29, #4...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to assess six residents (Resident #2, #14, #26, #29, #41, and #61) for the use of bed rails. Additionally staff failed to complete ongoing entrapment assessments, and/or obtain consent for the use of bedrails. The facility census was 63.
1. The facility staff did not provide a bedrail safety policy.
2. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 6/9/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance, Need for assistance with personal care, other lack of coordination, and muscle weakness (generalized);
-Required extensive one staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers;
-Did not use bed rails.
Review of the resident's medical record showed it did not contain on-going bed rail assessments or entrapment assessments.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:13 A.M., showed the resident in bed with grab bars raised on both sides.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:32 A.M., showed the resident in bed with grab bars raised on both sides.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 3:36 P.M., showed the resident in bed with grab bars raised on both sides.
3. Review of Resident #14's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Dependent for transfers;
-Required extensive two staff assistance for bed mobility and toileting;
-Required extensive one staff assistance for bathing, personal hygiene and wheelchair mobility;
-Required the use of a wheelchair.
Review of the resident's medical showed staff documented a Quarterly Side Rail Assessment, dated 6/30/22. The assessment did not contain an updated entrapment assessment.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:44 A.M., showed the resident's bed had a bedrail raised on the right side.
Observation on 9/6/22 showed the resident in bed with a bedrail raised on the right side.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:05 A.M., showed the resident in bed with a bedrail raised on the right side.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 9:17 A.M., showed the resident in bed with a bedrail raised on the right side.
During an interview on 9/8/22 at 9:17 A.M., the resident they had used the bedrail for a long time to assist with stability during care.
4. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of right main bronchus, depression, spondylosis (wear and tear on spinal discs) without myelopathy (nerve damage) or radiculopathy (form of pinched nerve), lumbar region, Age-related osteoporosis (a condition in which the bones become weak and brittle);
-Independent without staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers;
-Did not use bed rails.
Review of the resident medical record showed it did not contain a bedrail assessment, consent, or an entrapment assessment. Additionally, staff did not address the use of bedrails on the resident's care plan.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:31 A.M., showed the resident's bed had bedrails raised both sides.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:38 P.M., showed the resident's bed had bedrails raised on both sides.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:38 A.M., showed the resident's bed had bedrails raised on both sides.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:22 A.M., showed the resident's bed had bedrails raised on both sides.
During an interview on 9/7/22 at 9:38 A.M., the resident said they used the bedrails for transfers and bed mobility.
5. Review of Resident #29's 5-Day Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers.
-Did not use bed rails.
Review of the resident's medical record showed it did not contain ongoing bedrail assessments.
Review of the Physician Order Summary (POS), undated, showed an order for a grab bar for positioning and assistance with dressing.
Review of the care plan revised 6/27/22, showed the resident used a mobility bar to assist with turning, repositioning and standing.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:30 P.M., showed a mobility bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observations on 9/7/22 at 8:25 A.M., showed a mobility bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 2:52 P.M., showed a mobility bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/9/22 at 8:43 A.M., showed a mobility bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
6. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident:
-Moderate cognitive impairment;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and transfers;
-Did not use bed rails.
Review of the resident's medical record showed it did not contain ongoing mobility bar assessments.
Review of the POS, undated, showed an order for a grab bar.
Review of the care plan, dated 8/4/22, showed the resident used a grab bar to assist with repositioning and transfers in and out of bed.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 10:55 A.M., showed a grab bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:36 A.M., showed a grab bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 10:16 A.M., showed a grab bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/9/22 01:47 PM., showed a grab bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
Observation on 9/12/22 at 12:39 P.M., showed a grab bar raised on one side of the resident's bed.
7. Review of Resident #61's 5-day MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively impaired;
-Had diagnoses of Respiratory failure (lungs fail to get enough oxygen to the blood), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Osteomyelitis (infection or inflammation to the bone or bone marrow), and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (condition that affects the hearts ability to pump blood);
-Required physical assistance of two staff for transfers;
-Required physical assistance of one staff for bed mobility;
-Did not have behaviors or reject care;
-Did not use of bedrails.
Review of the resident's POS, dated 3/30/22, showed a mobility bar may be used to assist in self positioning in bed and with transfers.
Review of the resident's device assessment, dated 3/9/22 and signed on 3/29/22, showed mobility bars may be used for mobility.
Review of the resident's medical record showed it did not contain an ongoing device assessment for June 2022.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:42 P.M., showed the resident in bed with a grab bar raised on one side.
8. During an interview on 9/8/22 at 2:59 P.M., the Administrator said staff do not routinely document or inspect bedrails/grab bars. He/She said he/she expects staff to verbally inform the maintenance staff if there is an issue with the side rails/grab bars. He/She said the maintenance staff installs the bed rails. He/She said staff do not document entrapment assessments.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:25 A.M., the Maintenance Director said he/she installs the rails on the bed when asked to do so. He/She said nursing assesses the residents and rails for safety, and if there is an issue they are to inform the maintenance staff.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said nursing assesses the residents for bedrails safety and check for informed consent on a quarterly basis with MDS assessments.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said therapy staff orders the bedrails and performs the assessments. He/she did not know how often therapy completed the bedrail assessment and did not know who completed the entrapment assessments.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said maintenance staff is responsible for completing the bedrail entrapment assessments, but he/she did not know how often they were completed. He/She did not know who was responsible for bed rail assessments and obtaining consent.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a mobility bar policy but he/she expects the care plans to address them if the resident uses them. He/she said the use of mobility bars should be determined by an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) before they are used, and If it is determined they are appropriate, maintenance applies the device and completes the measurements for entrapment. He/She said the nursing staff should complete a bedrail screening and ensure a consent form has been signed. The bedrail assessments should initially be completed by the nurse managers, and then quarterly assessments should be completed with the MDS assessments. He/She said mobility bars should have a physician's order.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve meals in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus for two residents (Residents #50 and #57) who received...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve meals in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus for two residents (Residents #50 and #57) who received Level 7 Easy to Chew (a diet in which food pieces are smaller or greater than 15 millimeters in size for adults and does not include hard, tough, chewy, fibrous, stringy, crunchy, or crumbly bits, pips, seeds, fibrous parts of fruit, husks or bones) and three residents (Residents #1, #4 and #16) who received Level 6 Soft and Bite-Sized (SB)(a diet in which food pieces are no greater than 15 millimeters in size for adults, is soft, tender and moist throughout with no separate thin liquid, can be can be mashed/broken down with pressure from fork, spoon or chopsticks and requires chewing before swallowing) diets. The facility staff also failed to document and maintain a record of substitutions made to the menus. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Menus policy, dated May 2015, showed:
-Menus shall meet the nutritional needs of the resident in accordance with the attending physician's orders and the recommended dietary allowances;
-The original set of menus should be kept in the Dietary Services Manager's office with copies made for the staff to use;
-Menus will be dated and posted on the bulletin board in the kitchen;
-A food substitute should be consistent with the usual and ordinary food item provided by the facility;
-When substitutions are made, changes are posted on the menu or substitution sheet. If a single item is substituted because because it is not available, it should be posted on the substitution sheet. Dated records of substitutions are retained for 30 days.
2. Review of Resident #50's physician orders dated September 2022, showed the resident's physician directed staff to provide the resident with a Level 7 Easy to Chew diet.
Review of Resident #57's physician orders dated September 2022, showed the resident's physician directed staff to provide the resident with a Level 7 Easy to Chew diet.
Review of the facility lunch menus dated 09/08/22 (Week 2, Day 12), showed the menus directed staff to serve residents on Level 7 Easy to Chew diets with:
-a #8 (four ounce) scoop of SB minced and moist (MM) pork rib patty;
-a #8 scoop of pureed potato salad.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 10:00 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said they substituted the pork rib patties with pork patties because they did not have the pork rib patties. The DM also said he/she does not maintain a record of substitutions made to the menus and he/she did not know he/she needed one. The DM said he/she chooses substitutions from the dietician approved list posted on refrigerator. The DM said the substituted items should be served the same as what is on the menu.
Observation on 09/08/22 of the lunch meal service in the south dining room which began at 12:00 P.M., showed staff served Residents #50 and #57 a three ounce portion whole pork patty and #8 scoop of regular potato salad.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 12:08 P.M., the DM said he/she did not look at the menus prior to service and did not know the Level 7 Easy Chew diets were supposed to receive SBMM pork and pureed potato salad.
3. Review of Resident #1's physician orders dated September 2022, showed the resident's physician directed staff to provide the resident with a Level 6 SB diet.
Review of Resident #4's physician orders dated September 2022, showed the resident's physician directed staff to provide the resident with a Level 6 SB diet.
Review of Resident #16's physician orders dated September 2022, showed the resident's physician directed staff to provide the resident with a Level 6 SB diet.
Review of the facility lunch menus dated 09/08/22 (Week 2, Day 12), showed the menus directed staff to serve residents on Level 6 SB diets with:
- a #8 scoop of pureed potato salad;
-a #10 (3.2 ounce) scoop of pureed mock pecan pie.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 10:00 A.M., the DM said they substituted the mock pecan pie with apple dump cake. The DM said there was no reason they could not have made the mock pecan pie as directed by the menus and they just decided to change it. The DM said he/she was told they could use a variety of desserts as long as they had a recipe and the dietician signed off on it. The DM said he/she did not have a recipe for the apple dump cake. The DM also said he/she does not maintain a record of substitutions made to the menus and he/she did not know he/she needed one. The DM said the substituted items should be served the same as what is on the menu.
Observation on 09/08/22 of the lunch meal service in the south dining room which began at 12:00 P.M., showed staff served Residents #1, #4 and #16 a #8 scoop of regular potato salad and a #10 scoop of regular apple dump cake.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 12:08 P.M., the DM said he/she did not look at the menus prior to service and did not know the Level 6 SB diets were supposed to receive pureed potato salad and pureed cake.
4. During an interview on 09/09/22 at 9:04 A.M., the administrator said staff should prepare and serve foods in accordance with the planned menus. The administrator said it is acceptable for staff to make substitutions to the menu when food items are not available, but they should not make substitutions just because they feel like. The administrator said staff are expected to document substitutions made to the menus and he/she did not know the staff were not writing them down. The administrator also said staff should have recipes for substituted items.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a man...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use hand hygiene and provide perineal care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for one resident (Resident #63), failed to provide wound care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for one resident (Resident #28), and indwelling catheter (tubing placed into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) care in a manner to reduce the risk of infection for one resident (Resident #50). Additionally, facility staff failed to decrease the risk of infection for four residents (Resident #4, #19, #34, and #61) with indwelling catheters by keeping the tubing off the floor, the facility failed to handle medications in a manner to reduce the risk for infection, and failed to cleanse a Hoyer lift (mechanical device used to lift and transfer a resident) between residents. The facility census was 63.
Review of the facility's Handwashing policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose is to reduce transmission of organisms from resident to resident, nursing staff to resident and resident to nursing staff. Further review showed it did not contain direction on when staff are to wash their hands or perform hand hygiene.
Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy, dated March 2015, showed the purpose is to clean the perineum and prevent infection and odor and directed the staff to:
-Position the resident, wash the resident with warm wet washcloth, rinse and pat dry resident, roll resident to side and wash resident bottom with warm wet washcloth, rinse and dry resident, reposition resident to back, remove gloves and wash hands.
1. Observation on 9/07/22 at 2:19 P.M., showed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D put on gloves before entering Resident #63's room, but did not perform hand hygiene. Observation showed there was no hand sanitizer on the supply cart. CNA D wiped the resident's buttocks, put a new incontinence pad under the resident wearing the same soiled gloves. CNA D removed his/her gloves, but did not perform hand hygiene before he/she covered the resident with a blanket, and gave the resident his/her call light. CNA D did not perform hand hygiene before leaving the room.
During an interview on 9/7/22 at 2:30 P.M., CNA D said staff are directed to use hand hygiene before and after providing care and before leaving the room. He/She did know to use hand hygiene before entering the room and putting on gloves. He/She should have performed hand hygiene before touching the clean incontinence pad, touching the resident's blanket, and before leaving the room. He/She said there was no hand sanitizer on the cart where the gloves and other perineal care supplies were located, so he/she did not perform hand hygiene before putting on the gloves.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said staff are directed to clean hands before putting on gloves and starting a procedure. Gloves should be changed and hand hygiene performed after cleaning the resident with a soapy cloth and before rinsing the perineal area with a new washcloth. He/She said staff should remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after providing care and before moving onto another task.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said staff should perform hand hygiene before and after providing direct care to a resident, if hands become soiled, and when going from dirty to clean.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said nursing staff is expected to wash hands when they enter and leave a room and when taking off gloves. Staff should wash or use gel between dirty and clean tasks. The DON said staff should not touch clean linens after completing dirty tasks without hand washing.
2. Review of the facility's Dressing Change (Clean) policy, undated, showed staff are instructed:
-Put on second pair of disposable gloves;
-Spray wound cleanser onto gauze to be used for cleaning, if required;
-Cleanse wound;
-Wash hands, sanitize and change gloves.
Review of Resident # 28's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 7/25/22, showed staff assessed the resident as:
- Cognitively intact;
- Diagnoses of osteoarthritis, urinary tract infection (UTI), and open wound to right foot;
- Two facility acquired, stage II (a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) pressure ulcers.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 1:22 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C did not perform hand hygiene before he/she applied gloves and initiated wound care. The CMT wiped the wound on the resident's right big toe multiple times with the same gauze. CMT C changed gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. Further observation showed the CMT wiped the wound on the resident's right heel multiple times with the same gauze.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said staff are to start in the center of the wounds and wipe in a circular motion outward. Staff should not wipe the area multiple times with the same gauze.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Nurse said staff are expected to perform hand hygiene before entering the resident's room and to apply gloves before touching the resident for wound care. Hand hygiene and glove changes should occur every time staff touches a dirty area and before a cleaner area is touched. While cleansing a wound, gauze should be changed between cleansing one area and then another. After wound care staff should perform hand hygiene as they exit the room.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said hand hygiene should be performed before and after care and after dirty tasks and before clean care tasks. He/she would expect nursing staff to cleanse a wound starting at the center of the wound and work outward in a circular manner. The DON said the same gauze should not drag across the wound more than one time.
3. Review of the facility's Catheter Care (Indwelling) policy, dated March 2015, showed:
-The purpose is to prevent infection and reduce irritation;
-Staff should wash hands, apply gloves, use a washcloth to cleanse the the skin around the catheter insertion site and change position of the washcloth after each stroke or downward motion, rinse with a clean washcloth, use a clean warm soapy washcloth to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward, check tubing and drainage bag to insure proper drainage, and wash and dry hands.
-The policy did not contain direction to keep the drainage bag or tubing off the floor.
4. Review of Resident #50's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Severely cognitively impaired;
-Diagnoses of heart failure, high blood pressure, neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem), stroke, dementia, depression, and lung disease;
-Had an indwelling catheter.
Review of the resident's physician orders showed:
-On 3/11/22 the physician ordered staff to complete catheter care every shift;
-On 3/15/22 the physician ordered staff to change the indwelling foley catheter and may irrigate foley as needed with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:51 A.M., showed CNA I washed his/her hands and applied gloves, cleansed the resident's groin area between the resident's legs with a washcloth, and then use a new washcloth to cleanse the catheter insertion site. CNA I did not sanitize his/her hands or change gloves prior to cleansing the catheter insertion site.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Nurse said staff are expected to perform hand hygiene before entering the resident's room and to don (apply) gloves before touching the resident. Hand hygiene and glove changes should occur every time staff touches a dirty area and then before a cleaner area is touched, and perform hand hygiene as staff exits the room.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A staff should use hand hygiene and put on new gloves before providing care. Gloves should be removed and hand hygiene used before moving from one area to another.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said nursing staff should perform hand hygiene when entering and leaving the room and before and after cleansing the catheter.
5. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Diagnoses of Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, presence of urogenital implants, retention of urine, unspecified;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff for bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene.
Review of the resident's Physicians Order Sheet (POS), dated September 2022, showed an order for an indwelling urinary catheter for a diagnosis of Neurogenic bladder.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:19 A.M., showed the resident's catheter tubing touched the ground under his/her wheelchair.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 11:29 A.M., showed CNA J propel the resident from his/her room to the dining room. The resident's catheter tubing touched the floor.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 12:14 P.M., showed the resident sat in the dining room, his/her catheter tubing touched the floor.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 3:31 P.M., showed the resident sat in his/her room, his/her catheter tubing touched the ground under his/her wheelchair.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 1:21 P.M., showed the resident in bed, his/her catheter bag touched the floor.
Observation 9/8/22 at 9:31 A.M., showed the resident in bed, his/her catheter bag touched the floor.
6. Review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
-Cognitively intact;
-Did not refuse care;
-Required extensive assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene;
-Had an indwelling catheter.
Observation on 9/6/22 at 1:48 P.M., showed Resident #19's catheter tubing rested on the floor under his/her wheelchair.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:17 P.M., showed the resident's catheter tubing rested on the floor under his/her wheelchair.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 1:21 P.M., showed the resident's catheter tubing rested on the floor under his/her wheelchair.
Observation on 9/8/22 at 8:14 A.M., showed the resident's catheter tubing rested on the floor under his/her wheelchair.
7. Review of Resident #34's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the resident as:
- Cognitively intact;
- Had diagnoses of high blood pressure, neurogenic bladder, quadriplegia, depression, pulmonary disease, and traumatic brain injury;
- Had an indwelling catheter;
- Was totally dependent on staff for toileting.
Review of the resident's physician order, dated 2/10/22, showed catheter care every shift.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:45 A.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in his/her room with the catheter bag hooked to the side of the wheelchair. Further observation showed the catheter tubing touched the floor.
8. Review of Resident #61's 5-day MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff assessed the residents as:
-Cognitively impaired;
-Had diagnosis of Respiratory failure (lungs fail to get enough oxygen to the blood), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Osteomyelitis (infection or inflammation to the bone or bone marrow);
-Did not have a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplagia (BPH), an enlargement of the prostate gland that can cause urinary difficulty or diagnosis of urinary retention (difficulty with urination);
-Had an indwelling catheter;
-Required physical assistance of one staff for toileting.
Review of the resident's physician order, dated 8/18/22, showed an the physician ordered an indwelling catheter for BPH with retention for the resident.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 8:10 A.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in his/her room with the catheter bag hooked to the side of the wheelchair. Further observation showed the bottom of the catheter bag touched the floor.
9. During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., CNA A said the catheter tubing should be placed around the leg to prevent it from touching the floor. He/She said if the tubing did touch the floor, then it should be replaced by the nurse.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said he/she would expect staff to change or replace catheter tubing that had touched the floor.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said he/she would expect catheter tubing to be underneath a resident's wheelchair and not touching the ground. He/She said if the catheter touches the floor it is to be replaced by the nurse.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said catheter bags and tubing should not rest on the floor and he/she would expect staff to correct it by maneuvering it so it did not rest on the floor.
10. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated March 2015, showed it did not contain direction for staff on how to prepare or dispense medication from a multiple dose bottle.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:21 A.M., showed CMT C entered room [ROOM NUMBER], administered medications to the resident, exited the room, and did not sanitize his/her hands. Further observation showed the CMT touched and opened the medication cart, opened an unidentified medication and dispensed pills into his/her hand, placed one pill in a cup, and placed the remaining pills back in to the medication bottle. The CMT shut the medication cart, touched and opened the second drawer, opened an unidentified medication and dispensed pills in to his/her hand, placed one pill in a cup, and placed the remaining pills back in to the medication bottle.
Observation on 9/7/22 at 9:26 A.M. showed CMT C did not sanitize his/her hands, touched and opened the medication cart, opened an unidentified medication and dispensed pills in to his/her hand, placed one pill in a cup, and placed the remaining pills back in to the medication bottle.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:37 A.M., the MDS Nurse said when medications are from a stock bottle, the medication should not be touched, but instead poured directly into the medication cup or into the cap of the medication bottle and then dumped into the medication cup. He/She said staff are not to touch medication with their bare hands.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., LPN B said staff are supposed to pour stock meds on to a pill counter or in the lid of the bottle, obtain the quantity, and pour them back into the bottle. Staff should not touch medication with their bare hands due to cross contamination.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the DON said he/she expects staff to either pour medications from a bottle directly into the medication cup or into the lid of the bottle. He/she said staff should never touch medication with bare hands.
11. Review of the facility's Environmental policy, undated, showed semi-critical items that consist of items that may come in contact with mucous membranes or non-intact skin should be free from all microorganisms and should be cleansed and disinfected according to current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for disinfection of healthcare facilities and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens Standard.
Review of the facility's Implement Environmental Infection Control - Cleaning and Disinfection policy, undated, showed between each use, nondisposable medical equipment should be cleansed and disinfected.
Review of the facility's Hydraulic Lift (Hoyer Lift) policy, undated, showed it did not contain direction for staff in regard to cleansing the lift after use.
Observation 9/8/22 at 10:08 A.M., showed CNA H and LPN I entered Resident #1's room with a Hoyer lift, staff did not clean the lift, and staff transferred the resident from his/her bed to his/her wheelchair. LPN I pushed the lift back to the hallway, and did not disinfect the lift.
Observation on 9/8/22 from 10:12 A.M. to 10:21 A.M., showed the lift remained in the hallway, and had not been cleansed or disinfected.
During an interview on 9/8/22 at 10:12 A.M., CNA H said the Hoyer lift should be sanitized after each use. He/she said whoever removed the lift from the room should have sanitized it. He/she would sanitize it.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:14 P.M., LPN P said staff are expected to to clean the lift after every use. The lift should be cleaned before it is placed in the hallway to ensure it's not used before it's cleaned. He/She said the lift should not be left in the hallway dirty.
During an interview on 9/15/22 at 2:28 P.M., the DON said he/she would expect any area of the lift that was touched by the resident to be cleaned with a disinfecting wipe. He/She said it should be cleaned after each use.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. Facility s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to allow sanitized dishes to air dry prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens. Facility staff also failed to store food in a manner to prevent cross-contamination and out-dated use. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Dishwashing policy, dated May 2015, showed the policy directed staff to allow items to thoroughly dry before unloading racks or storing items.
Observation on 09/06/22 at 10:28 A.M., showed multiple metal food preparation and service pans of various sizes stacked together wet on the storage shelf.
Observation on 09/08/22 at 9:35 A.M., showed DA R removed coffee cups from the clean side of the mechanical dishwashing station and dried the cups with cloth towel before he/she put them away on the storage rack.
Observation on 09/08/22 at 9:41 A.M., showed seven metal food preparation and service pans stacked together wet on the storage shelves.
Observation on 09/08/22 at 9:47 A.M., showed three two quart plastic storage containers stacked together wet in the cabinets below the microwave.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 12:46 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said staff should ensure dishes are dry before they are put away and they can dry the dishes with a towel. The DM said he/she had never been told dishes had to be air dried.
During an interview on 09/09/22 at 8:58 A.M., the administrator said staff should allow dishes to air dry before they are put away. The administrator said that should be a part of their training. The administrator said it is never appropriate for staff to dry dishes with a towel.
2. Review of the facility's Storage of Dry Food and Supplies policy, dated May 2015, showed Open boxes are to be effectively re-sealed.
Observation on 09/06/22 during the initial kitchen tour which began at 10:28 A.M., showed:
-the walk-in refrigerator contained:
*an opened and undated two liter bottle of lemon-lime soda;
*an opened and undated 32 ounces (oz.) container of pineapple juice;
*an opened and undated container of liquid eggs;
-the walk-in freezer contained an undated and unlabeled bag of a shredded off-white food substance opened to the air and an opened and undated bag of ravioli;
-the reach-in refrigerator contained three unlabeled and undated pitchers which contained yellow, brown and red liquids.
Observation on 09/08/22 at 10:21 A.M., showed the dry goods pantry contained:
-an opened and undated 16 oz. bag of tiny twists pretzels;
-two undated plastic containers of cornflakes;
-two undated plastic containers of raisin bran;
-two undated plastic containers of crisp rice cereal;
-two undated plastic containers of cheerios;
-two undated plastic containers of fruit whirls cereal
Observation on 09/08/22 at 10:29 A.M., showed the reach-in refrigerator contained:
-an opened and undated two pound carton of strawberry yogurt;
-an opened and undated 46 oz. carton of cranberry cocktail juice;
-an opened and undated 46 oz. carton of tomato juice.
Observation on 09/08/22 at 10:33 A.M., showed the cook's station contained an opened and undated 25 pound bag of flour and a four pound box of salt dated 10-28 opened to the air.
During an interview, the DM said the date on the box of salt is the receipt date and staff should have dated it when they opened it. The DM also said he/she would not know how staff would cover the hole in the box.
Further observation of the cook's station showed:
-an undated large plastic bin with an opened and undated bag of pureed bread mix inside;
-an undated large plastic bin with an opened and undated bag of fish breading inside.
During an interview on 09/08/22 at 12:46 P.M., the DM said staff should date and label any opened food items and ensure containers are resealed.
During an interview on 09/09/22 at 9:03 A.M., the administrator said staff should date opened food items and stored them in a closed container or resealed in a bag.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0575
(Tag F0575)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post the telephone number for the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline (used to report allegatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post the telephone number for the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline (used to report allegations of abuse and neglect) in a form and manner accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights, undated, showed public information will be displayed throughout common areas of the facility, including Area Agency on Aging Posters, Resident Rights Universal Language, and any other pertinent information obtained through the Area Agency of Aging or local Ombudsman.
Observations from 9/6/22 at 10:00 A.M. through 9/12/22 at 3:00 P.M., showed the facility did not post the name, address, and toll free telephone number for the Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline in an accessible location for residents or visitors to use if needed.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said he/she did not know if the Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline information was posted in a visible location. He/She said he/she did not know how the residents or visitors would know how to report a concern without asking staff member.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said the hotline number is available to staff in the break room and posted on bulletin board by the main offices.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator said the abuse and neglect hotline number is posted on the bulletin board between north and south wings. They said they were not aware is was not posted.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0680
(Tag F0680)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Job Desc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The facility census was 63.
1. Review of the facility's Job Description Activity Director, dated May 2006, showed:
-The primary purpose of your position is to develop, organize, conduct, and evaluate activity programs for the residents that will contribute to their fuller and richer quality of life and to help maintain or increase resident's ability to meet their living requirements in accordance with the facility mission philosophy and as directed by the Administrator;
-Develops, administers, and coordinates the activity department's programs, policies and procedures including scheduling movies, plan parties, and provide games/activities for residents;
-Minimum qualifications of a high school diploma or General Education Development (GED) equivalent and Activity Director Certification.
During an interview on 9/09/22 at 9:22 A.M., the Social Service Director (SSD) said he/she was not certified and had not completed a training course provided by the state in order to provide activities to the residents. He/She said he/she had received no training, and had been the Activity Director (AD) for over a year.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Administrator said the AD does not have the required certification. He/She said they have looked for an AD, but have not been able to find one.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, and on a daily basis in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 63.
1. The facility staff did not provide a staff posting policy.
Observations from 9/6/22 at 10:00 A.M. through 9/9/22 at 3:00 P.M., showed a nurse staffing posting was not available.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said the Director of Nursing (DON) has a binder with the nurse staff information in his/her office and a copy hangs in the breakroom. He/She does not know if the nurse staff posting is hung in viewable site for residents and visitors.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 11:47 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) said the nurse staff posting is located in a book at the nurses' desk, which residents and visitors do not have access to. He/She said he/she assumed the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and DON were responsible for updating the posting. He/She said the posting should include the number of CMT's, aides and nurses.
During an interview on 9/12/22 at 12:53 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the staff posting is located on the wall on the north wing. He/she said the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) is responsible to fill those out. He/she said it previously hung on the bulletin board outside the conference room office but has been moved. He/she said the ADON kept all prior postings in their office.