Ambassador Health of Lincoln
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Ambassador Health of Lincoln has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average, but not exceptional. It ranks #72 out of 177 facilities in Nebraska, placing it in the top half, and #7 out of 14 in Lancaster County, meaning there are only a few local options that are better. The trend is improving, with reported issues decreasing from 8 in 2023 to 5 in 2024, suggesting positive changes are being made. Staffing is a strength, rated at 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 45% which is below the state average, meaning staff are likely to remain and develop relationships with residents. However, there have been some concerning incidents, such as staff failing to perform proper hand hygiene in the kitchen, and a resident's nebulizer kit not being cleaned after use, indicating potential risks in infection control and resident care. Overall, while the facility shows some strengths, there are important areas needing improvement.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Nebraska
- #72/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 45% turnover. Near Nebraska's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $9,750 in fines. Lower than most Nebraska facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Nebraska nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (45%)
3 points below Nebraska average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Nebraska avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S)
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff ex...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D)
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6(7)
Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to follow the physician's order for administration of Oxygen for Resident 28.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.11C
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and wear a beard net in the kitchen to prevent food-borne ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C.
Record review of Resident 28's Continuity of Care Document dated 11/7/24 revealed admission to facility was 12/28/2017.
Reco...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09B1(2)
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Ch...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number175 NAC 12-006.09B
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to code anti-anxiety me...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D
Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection and prevent cross contam...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Offic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERRENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-00609D
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to a fluid restriction ordered for Resident 16. The sample ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERRENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12A
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of duplicate medications related to the use of 4 hypoglycemic med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
B. Record review of Resident 44's medication administration record revealed Resident 44 had an order for clonazepam 1.5mg (milligrams) at bedtime which began on 4/15/2022. Resident 44 had an order for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
D. An observation on 01/17/2023 at 03:30 PM revealed Resident 68's nebulizer kit had been placed on top of the nebulizer machine with a residual amount of medication left in it.
An observation on 01/1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 45% turnover. Below Nebraska's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Ambassador Health Of Lincoln's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Ambassador Health of Lincoln an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Ambassador Health Of Lincoln Staffed?
CMS rates Ambassador Health of Lincoln's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Ambassador Health Of Lincoln?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at Ambassador Health of Lincoln during 2023 to 2024. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Ambassador Health Of Lincoln?
Ambassador Health of Lincoln is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AMBASSADOR HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 122 certified beds and approximately 76 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Lincoln, Nebraska.
How Does Ambassador Health Of Lincoln Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Ambassador Health of Lincoln's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ambassador Health Of Lincoln?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Ambassador Health Of Lincoln Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Ambassador Health of Lincoln has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Ambassador Health Of Lincoln Stick Around?
Ambassador Health of Lincoln has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Ambassador Health Of Lincoln Ever Fined?
Ambassador Health of Lincoln has been fined $9,750 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Nebraska average of $33,176. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Ambassador Health Of Lincoln on Any Federal Watch List?
Ambassador Health of Lincoln is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.