COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Covenant Living of Keene has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating that the facility is highly recommended and performs well compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #5 out of 73 facilities in New Hampshire, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among seven facilities in Cheshire County. However, the trend is worsening, as the number of reported issues increased from two in 2024 to three in 2025. Staffing is a notable strength, with a perfect rating of 5/5 stars and a turnover rate of 42%, which is below the state average, suggesting that staff are familiar with the residents' needs. On the downside, there were concerns noted during inspections, such as failing to monitor antibiotic use properly and not having a qualified professional oversee the activities program, which may impact the quality of care provided.
- Trust Score
- A
- In New Hampshire
- #5/73
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near New Hampshire's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 104 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New Hampshire nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below New Hampshire average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near New Hampshire avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a monthly MRR (Medication Regimen Review) by a pharmacist for 1 of 5 residents reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established antibiotic stewardship protocols for monitoring the appropriate antibiotic use (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan for 2 resident in a final sample of 8 residents (Resident identifiers are #5 and #13).
Findings ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was on antipsychotic medication had adequate indication of use that was necessary to trea...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately reflect resident use of restraints on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 out of 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, review of personnel files, and review of facility's policy, it was determined that the facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents on anti-psychotics and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that expired medications were removed from the medication cart for 1 of 1 medication carts revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0680
(Tag F0680)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0712
(Tag F0712)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #162
Review on 4/20/23 of Resident #162 electronic medical records revealed that Resident #162 was admitted to the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0946
(Tag F0946)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff were provided annual training for the facility's ethics program for 2 out of 3 staff reviewed.
Finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New Hampshire.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below New Hampshire's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Covenant Living Of Keene's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New Hampshire, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Covenant Living Of Keene Staffed?
CMS rates COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the New Hampshire average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Covenant Living Of Keene?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 9 with potential for harm and 2 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Covenant Living Of Keene?
COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by COVENANT LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 20 certified beds and approximately 18 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in KEENE, New Hampshire.
How Does Covenant Living Of Keene Compare to Other New Hampshire Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire, COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Covenant Living Of Keene?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Covenant Living Of Keene Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Covenant Living Of Keene Stick Around?
COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for New Hampshire nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Covenant Living Of Keene Ever Fined?
COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Covenant Living Of Keene on Any Federal Watch List?
COVENANT LIVING OF KEENE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.