SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

406 COURT STREET, LACONIA, NH 03246 (603) 524-0466
Non profit - Church related 51 Beds CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#13 of 73 in NH
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Saint Francis Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in Laconia, New Hampshire, has earned a Trust Grade of A, which indicates it is an excellent facility and highly recommended. It ranks #13 out of 73 nursing homes in the state, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 4 in Belknap County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is showing an improving trend, having reduced its issues from four in 2023 to none in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4 out of 5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is significantly lower than the state average of 50%. While there have been no fines, there are some concerns to note. Recent inspections revealed that the facility failed to ensure that two residents received their medications as ordered by physicians, and one resident did not have their hearing aid in, which affected their ability to communicate. Additionally, there was a medication cart observed with unlabeled pills, raising concerns about proper medication management. Overall, while the facility has many strengths, these incidents highlight areas needing improvement.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In New Hampshire
#13/73
Top 17%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near New Hampshire's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for New Hampshire. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 4 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below New Hampshire average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near New Hampshire avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Oct 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 2 residents in a final sample of 12 residents and 1 of 27 medications observed during medication administration (Resident identifiers are #20, #3, and #13). Findings include: Standards: [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2009. Page 336 - Physicians' Orders The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or harm clients. Therefore you need to assess all orders, and if you find one to be erroneous or harmful, further clarification from the physician is necessary . Resident #20 Observation on 10/11/23 at approximately 10:30 a.m. of Resident #20 revealed an approximately 2 by (x) 2 inch white dressing, undated adhered to his/her right cheek. Review on 10/11/23 of Resident #20's current physician's order revealed that there was no order for a dressing to Resident #20's right cheek. Observation on 10/12/23 at approximately 11:15 a.m. of Resident #20 revealed an approximately 2 x 2 inch white dressing, undated adhered to his/her right cheek. Interview on 10/12/23 at approximately 11:15 a.m. with Staff B (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that Resident #20 did not have an order for the bandage. Resident #3 Review on 10/11/23 of Resident #3's October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following physician's order: Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 50 mg [milligrams], Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Hypertension/Heart failure, Hold if SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] is less than 110 or HR [Heart Rate] less than 55, start date 10/3/23. Further review of Resident #3's October 2023 MAR revealed that on 10/9/23 Resident #3's SBP was documented as 113 and HR was documented as 56. The MAR indicated that on 10/9/23 the Metoprolol was not administered for vital signs outside of they parameter of the physician's order. Interview on 10/12/23 at approximately 10:40 a.m. with Staff E (Director of Nursing) confirmed that the vital signs were not outside of the medication parameters and should have been administered as ordered by the physician. Resident #13 Observation on 10/12/23 at approximately 8:10 a.m. of Resident #13's medication administration with Staff C (Medication Nursing Assistant) revealed that Staff C was going to administer Resident #13 Senna 8.6 mg. Review on 10/12/23 at approximately 8:10 a.m. of Resident #13's October 2023 MARs revealed the following order: Sennosides 8.6 mg - docusate sodium 50 mg tablet, 1 oral, start date 1/5/23. Interview on 10/12/23 at approximately 8:10 a.m. with Staff C confirmed the above findings.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0685 (Tag F0685)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care to ensure that a resident's ability to hear was maintained with a communica...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care to ensure that a resident's ability to hear was maintained with a communication device for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication in a final sample of 12 residents (Resident Identifier is #18). Findings include: Resident #18 Interview on 10/11/23 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident #18 revealed that his/her hearing was poor. Resident #18 was having a difficult time hearing the questions asked therefore an interview was not conducted. Observation on 10/11/23 at 10:02 a.m. revealed that Resident #18 did not have a hearing aid in either ear. Interview on 10/11/23 at 10:05 a.m. with Staff C (Medication Nursing Assistant) revealed that Resident #18 wears a hearing aid and that Resident #18's hearing aid was in. Interview on 10/11/23 at 11:30 a.m. with Resident #18's family member revealed that Resident #18's hearing aids were not always in. Resident #18's family member was not aware of who was responsible for helping Resident #18 with putting them in his/her ears or if Resident #18 would be able to put them in himself/herself. Interview on 10/11/23 at 11:32 a.m. with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that Resident #18's hearing aid was not in either ear. Observation on 10/11/23 at 11:35 a.m. revealed Resident #18's hearing aid case on his/her bedside table. Resident #18 was not able to put the hearing aids on himself/herself. Observation further revealed Staff A put the hearing aids in Resident #18's ears. Review on 10/12/23 of Resident #18's care plan, Treatment Administration Record and task section in the electronic medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #18's need for a hearing aid. Observation on 10/12/23 at 9:45 a.m. revealed that Resident #18 did not have a hearing aid in either ear while Resident #18 was sitting in his/her chair, dressed, and eating breakfast. Interview on 10/12/23 at 9:47 a.m. with Staff F (Licensed Nursing Assistant) revealed that Staff F was assigned to Resident #18's care for the day. Interview further revealed that Staff F was not aware that Resident #18 wore a hearing aid. Interview further revealed that Staff F follows the tasks section in the electronic medical record to indicate what Resident #18's care needs would be.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled and stored appropriately for 1 of 1 medication carts observed. Fin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled and stored appropriately for 1 of 1 medication carts observed. Findings include: Birch Unit Observation on 10/11/23 at 8:36 a.m. of the Birch Unit medication cart revealed a medication cup with 7 white oval pills that were not labeled in the top drawer. Interview on 10/11/23 at 8:36 a.m. with Staff G ( Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed the above pills were not labeled. Staff G stated medication was acidophilus and that the pill bottle was in the refrigerator. Review on 10/12/23 of a printed paper provided by the facility on 10/12/23 revealed that three residents receive the above medication on the Birch Unit. Review on 10/12/23 of the facilitys policy titled Medication storage/Storage of Medication dated 01/21 revealed, .Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations . 1. Medications are to remain in these containers and stored in a controlled environment .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were accurately transferred from the previous Electronic Health Record (EHR) to the current EHR ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were accurately transferred from the previous Electronic Health Record (EHR) to the current EHR for 2 out of 27 medications reviewed during medication administration (Resident Identifiers are #9 and #7). Findings include: Resident #9 Review on 10/12/23 of Resident #9's October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR), found in the previous EHR revealed the following physician's order for medication administration: Esomeprazole magnesium 20 mg [milligram] capsule delayed release, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for GERD [Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease], start date 10/3/23. Review on 10/12/23 of Resident #9's physician's orders in the current EHR revealed the following order: Esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg capsule delayed release, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for GERD, start date 5/9/23. Interview on 10/12/23 at approximately 7:20 a.m. with Staff D (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that the correct dosage of the medication did not transfer accurately from the previous EHR to the current EHR. Resident #7 Review on 10/12/23 of Resident #7's October 2023's MAR in the previous EHR revealed the following physician's order for medication administration: Citalopram Hydrobromide tablet 10 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression, start date 10/5/23. Review on 10/12/23 of Resident #7's physician orders in the current EHR revealed the following order: Citalopram Hydrobromide tablet 20 mg., give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression, start date 4/20/22. Interview on 10/12/23 at approximately 7:40 a.m. with Staff D confirmed that the correct dosage of the medication did not transfer accurately from the previous EHR to the current EHR.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New Hampshire.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New Hampshire, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the New Hampshire average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER during 2023. These included: 4 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 51 certified beds and approximately 48 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LACONIA, New Hampshire.

How Does Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Compare to Other New Hampshire Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire, SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Stick Around?

SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for New Hampshire nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Ever Fined?

SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Saint Francis Rehabilitation And Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

SAINT FRANCIS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.