WEBSTER AT RYE
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Webster at Rye has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #28 out of 73 facilities in New Hampshire, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 12 in Rockingham County, indicating that only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from three in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, but with a 53% turnover rate, which is average for the state, suggesting that while some staff stay, there is room for improvement in retention. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and it has average RN coverage, meaning residents receive decent nursing attention. However, there are some concerning findings. One incident involved the dishwashing machine not reaching the required temperature, which could risk sanitation. Another issue was the failure to properly implement antibiotic protocols for a resident, potentially leading to inappropriate medication use. Lastly, there was a case where a resident was observed with medications not properly monitored for self-administration, posing a risk to their health. Overall, while Webster at Rye has strengths, these weaknesses indicate areas that need attention.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In New Hampshire
- #28/73
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for New Hampshire. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near New Hampshire avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement antibiotic use protocols that address unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for 1 of 6 residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sanitization of dishware in 1 of 1 kitchen observed.Findings include:Review on 8/20/25 of the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to determine if self-administration is appropriate for a resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respir...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an ongoing systematic collection of surveillance data during a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbr...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored at the proper temperature in 1 of 1 kitchenettes observed.
Findings include:
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formul...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 resident in a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled with an opened date or use by date and expired medications were re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New Hampshire.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New Hampshire facilities.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Webster At Rye's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WEBSTER AT RYE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within New Hampshire, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Webster At Rye Staffed?
CMS rates WEBSTER AT RYE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the New Hampshire average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Webster At Rye?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at WEBSTER AT RYE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 7 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Webster At Rye?
WEBSTER AT RYE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 61 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 74% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RYE, New Hampshire.
How Does Webster At Rye Compare to Other New Hampshire Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire, WEBSTER AT RYE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Webster At Rye?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Webster At Rye Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WEBSTER AT RYE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Hampshire. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Webster At Rye Stick Around?
WEBSTER AT RYE has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the New Hampshire average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Webster At Rye Ever Fined?
WEBSTER AT RYE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Webster At Rye on Any Federal Watch List?
WEBSTER AT RYE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.