FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Fountainview Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. It ranks #320 out of 344 in New Jersey, placing it in the bottom half of all state facilities, and #28 out of 31 in Ocean County, suggesting there are very few local options that are better. The facility's situation is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is rated average at 3 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 46%, which is typical for New Jersey but may indicate instability. However, the facility has faced concerning fines totaling $67,276, higher than 86% of others in the state, which raises alarms about compliance. Specific incidents include a serious case of verbal abuse where a staff member was recorded belittling a resident during a doctor's visit, and a failure to follow physician orders regarding the maintenance of a resident's CPAP machine, which compromises their health. While the quality measures rating is relatively good at 4 out of 5 stars, the overall poor health inspection score of 1 out of 5 indicates significant issues that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In New Jersey
- #320/344
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $67,276 in fines. Higher than 56% of New Jersey facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for New Jersey. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below New Jersey average (3.2)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near New Jersey avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Complaint #: NJ186666
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for a.) weekly cleaning and tubing changes for a resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2025
10 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Complaint #: NJ162242
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures by ensuring a resident (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Complaint #: NJ162242
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Complaint #: NJ162242
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights were protected when a staff member video recorded the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to respect the right to confidentiality of medical records during medication pass. This deficient practic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Complaint #: NJ162242
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Complaint #: NJ172235
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to installation of bedrails. This deficient pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication had a stop date. This deficient pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was maint...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Complaint# NJ00174037
Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 05/30/24, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete Medical Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call device within reach for 1 of 29 sampled residents, (Resident #67). Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 2/17/2023 at 09:32 AM, Surveyor #3 observed the following on the [NAME] unit:
*Residue buildup on the radiator near room [RO...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 2/16/2023 at 10:45 AM, Surveyor #2 observed Resident #68 in his/her room sitting in chair, with the oxygen infusing via a nas...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maint...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3.) On 2/17/2023 at 12:21 PM, Surveyor #3 observed a sign on Resident #97's room door that read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions: P...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 life-threatening violation(s), $67,276 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $67,276 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in New Jersey. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Fountainview's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within New Jersey, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Fountainview Staffed?
CMS rates FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the New Jersey average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Fountainview?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Fountainview?
FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 123 certified beds and approximately 84 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LAKEWOOD, New Jersey.
How Does Fountainview Compare to Other New Jersey Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Jersey, FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Fountainview?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Fountainview Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New Jersey. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Fountainview Stick Around?
FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for New Jersey nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Fountainview Ever Fined?
FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER has been fined $67,276 across 11 penalty actions. This is above the New Jersey average of $33,752. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Fountainview on Any Federal Watch List?
FOUNTAINVIEW CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.