Retirement Ranches Inc.
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Retirement Ranches Inc. has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it's slightly above average. Ranked #13 of 67 in New Mexico, it sits in the top half of facilities in the state and is the best option among three in Curry County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to just one in 2025. Staffing is a strength, rated 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 44%, which is better than the state average. However, the facility has $69,046 in fines, which is average but suggests some compliance issues. In terms of RN coverage, it is average, meaning residents may not receive the enhanced oversight that comes from higher RN staffing levels. Specific incidents include a critical finding where a resident was at risk due to missing leg straps on a lift, and concerns regarding the failure to ensure proper food handling practices, including unlabeled food items and the absence of temperature logs. While there are notable strengths, such as excellent staffing, the presence of fines and some concerning incidents should be carefully considered by families.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In New Mexico
- #13/67
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 44% turnover. Near New Mexico's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $69,046 in fines. Higher than 51% of New Mexico facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New Mexico nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (44%)
4 points below New Mexico average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near New Mexico avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the treatment cart on the 200 hall was locked while unattended. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 34 people resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure one out of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, menu review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were in place for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** S. On 02/23/24 at 9:10 am, during an observation of a Sara lift located in Pod/Unit/Hall 4 revealed there was not a leg strap at...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R # 3) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (R #45 )...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2022
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
A. On 10/06/22 at 8:00 am during an observation of the medication cart on Pod 5 (area that houses facility residents)had the computer screen open with the residents name and medications visible. Licen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding allegations of abuse fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed every...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 1 (R #'s 46) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to:
1. Ensure food items in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled and dated
2. Ensure that items were not stored on the bare...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to accurately post the actual number of nursing staff scheduled to provide direct patient care for all 85 residents residing in the facility. Thi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 44% turnover. Below New Mexico's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $69,046 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $69,046 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in New Mexico. Major compliance failures.
About This Facility
What is Retirement Ranches Inc.'s CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Retirement Ranches Inc. an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New Mexico, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Retirement Ranches Inc. Staffed?
CMS rates Retirement Ranches Inc.'s staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the New Mexico average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Retirement Ranches Inc.?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at Retirement Ranches Inc. during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Retirement Ranches Inc.?
Retirement Ranches Inc. is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 104 certified beds and approximately 67 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Clovis, New Mexico.
How Does Retirement Ranches Inc. Compare to Other New Mexico Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Mexico, Retirement Ranches Inc.'s overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Retirement Ranches Inc.?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Retirement Ranches Inc. Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Retirement Ranches Inc. has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Mexico. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Retirement Ranches Inc. Stick Around?
Retirement Ranches Inc. has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for New Mexico nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Retirement Ranches Inc. Ever Fined?
Retirement Ranches Inc. has been fined $69,046 across 12 penalty actions. This is above the New Mexico average of $33,769. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Retirement Ranches Inc. on Any Federal Watch List?
Retirement Ranches Inc. is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.