HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families looking for care. It ranks #50 out of 594 nursing homes in New York, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #5 out of 40 in Kings County, indicating there are only a few better local options. The facility shows an improving trend, with issues decreasing from five in 2022 to just two in 2024. While it has a strong overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars for quality measures, its staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars, reflecting below-average performance, although a turnover rate of 27% is better than the state average. However, the facility has faced some concerns, including not adequately informing residents about their rights to file complaints and failing to make survey results easily accessible to residents. Additionally, there was an issue where a resident's smoking agreement was not properly documented, which could lead to safety concerns. Overall, while there are strengths in quality of care, families should be aware of these weaknesses and ensure they are addressed.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In New York
- #50/594
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $4,226 in fines. Higher than 97% of New York facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for New York. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below New York average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 04/07/2024 to 04/12/2024, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were followed. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey conducted from 04/07/2024 through 04/12/2024, the facility did not ensure that the direct care staffing information ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that medical recor...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Resident #203 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Paranoid Schizophrenia, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Ch...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure safe food handling and storage was practiced to prevent food-borne illness...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident was...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, record review and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that ne...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a person-centere...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview conducted during the recertification surrey, the facility did not mainta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) The facility's policy and procedure titled Enteral Feedings effective 05/2015, documented that nursing staff may utilize glov...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0574
(Tag F0574)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (86/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New York.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $4,226 in fines. Lower than most New York facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare Staffed?
CMS rates HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE during 2019 to 2024. These included: 13 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare?
HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 288 certified beds and approximately 286 residents (about 99% occupancy), it is a large facility located in BROOKLYN, New York.
How Does Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare Stick Around?
Staff at HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ever Fined?
HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE has been fined $4,226 across 1 penalty action. This is below the New York average of $33,121. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?
HOPKINS CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.