PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Palm Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average compared to other facilities. In New York, it ranks #433 out of 594, placing it in the bottom half, and #34 out of 40 in Kings County, indicating that there are only a few local options that perform better. Unfortunately, the facility’s trend is worsening, having increased from 1 issue in 2021 to 6 in 2023. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 27%, which is well below the New York average of 40%, although the overall staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars. There have been no fines recorded, which is encouraging, but the facility does have some concerning incidents, such as failing to secure a surety bond for residents' personal funds and not accurately assessing a resident's mobility needs, which could lead to further complications. Overall, while there are some positive aspects regarding staffing and fines, there are significant weaknesses in compliance and quality of care that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In New York
- #433/594
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for New York. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below New York average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below New York average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Aug 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility did ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility did not ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/24/2023 to 8/31/2023, the facility did not ensure an account of all controlled drugs was maintain...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification/Complaint survey, the facility did not ensure t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews during the Recertification / Complaint Survey, the facility did not e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0570
(Tag F0570)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 8/24/23 - 8/31/23 the facility did not ensure that a surety bond was purchased to assure the security of all ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2021
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records review and interview conducted during the recertification survey; the facility did not develop and implement a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that a r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION during 2019 to 2023. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation?
PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SHIMON LEFKOWITZ, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 240 certified beds and approximately 228 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a large facility located in BROOKLYN, New York.
How Does Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation Stick Around?
Staff at PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Palm Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
PALM GARDENS CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.