SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00359779, and #NY00363581) dur...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00359779, and #NY00363581) during an Extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/2025, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse by other residents for three (3) (Resident #17, #71, and #75) of 12 residents reviewed. Specifically, on 11/4/2024, Resident #68 struck Resident #71 in the face with their walker, resulting in a laceration across the bridge of Resident #71's nose, and skin tears to their right cheek and chin. Additionally, on 12/5/2024, 12/10/2024, and 12/11/2024, physical altercations occurred between Residents #17 and #75, who were roommates and remained roommates until after the third altercation on 12/11/2024. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #71.
The findings are:
The policy titled Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process, last revised 12/15, documented it is the policy of the facility to treat all residents with kindness, dignity, and consideration. They ensure all residents are free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse.
The policy titled Abuse Preventing and Reporting, last revised 9/23, documented an abusive act is defined as any act of commission or omission that causes potential or actual physical or emotional harm or injury to a resident. Physical abuse is defined as any act or omission which may cause or causes physical pain, harm or injury to the resident or where it is reasonable to believe that pain, harm or injury would result. Physical abuse may include, but is not limited to slapping, pinching, kicking, pushing or rough handling, and/or failure to intervene in a resident altercation that results in physical harm to a resident.
1. Resident #68 had diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness, and agitation. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/9/2024 documented Resident #68 was severely cognitively impaired, was usually understood, and usually understands.
The [NAME] (a guide used by staff to provide care) dated 1/31/2025 documented Resident #68 was independent with ambulation on the unit, using a rolling walker. The facility could not provide a [NAME] for the time of the abuse 11/4/2024.
The comprehensive care plan dated 6/18/2021 documented Resident #68 had a history of physical and verbal aggression, intolerance of noise and of others entering their room, related to dementia. Staff were to assess and anticipate resident's needs, intervene before agitation escalates, guide away from source of distress, and allow to share feelings. On 2/2/2024 a Velcro stop sign was added across entry doorway as needed and the door to their room was to be closed.
Resident #71 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (lung disease that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breath), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and depression. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #71 was severely cognitively impaired, sometimes understands, was sometime understood, continuously had disorganized thinking and wandered occasionally.
The [NAME] dated 1/31/2025 documented Resident #71 was independent with wheelchair mobility on the unit. The facility could not provide a [NAME] for the time of the abuse 11/4/2024.
The comprehensive care plan identified as current, dated 6/12/2023, documented Resident #71 had impaired cognitive function related to dementia and to cue, reorient and supervise as needed. The comprehensive care plan documented Resident #71 had a communication problem related to a hearing deficit. Staff were to anticipate and meet needs and to be conscious of Resident #71's position when in groups, activities, and dining room to promote communication with others. The comprehensive care plan did not document that Resident #71 wandered into unsafe places or displayed behaviors directed towards others.
Review of the resident-to-resident incident reports for Resident #71 and Resident #68 completed by Registered Nurse #1, and the facility's investigation report completed by the Director of Nursing dated 11/4/2024, revealed at 2:45 PM, Resident #71 was propelling their wheelchair down the hallway when they opened Resident #68's room door and started to enter. Resident #68 met Resident #71 in the doorway, lifted their walker to Resident #71's face, and began pushing them out of their room. Resident #71 began yelling, which alerted staff, who then immediately intervened and separated the two (2) residents. Resident #71 sustained a skin tear to their right cheek and chin and a laceration across the bridge of their nose with a moderate amount of bloody drainage. Bruising was also noted across their nose. Resident #71 was visibly upset and showed moderate signs of pain and discomfort. Tylenol was given, the wounds were cleansed, and steri-strips (thin, sticky bandages applied to skin to help cuts or wounds stay closed) were applied to their right cheek and nose, along with a dry clean dressing to their chin. X-rays were obtained and were negative for any fractures. Resident #68 became aggressive towards staff and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The reports documented Resident #68 had a history of aggression towards other residents and staff, had a private room for safety, and the door was kept shut. The resident-to-resident reports and the facility investigation report did not document the stop sign was in place across Resident #68's door at the time of the abuse on 11/4/2024.
Interdisciplinary progress notes dated 11/4/2024 through 11/11/2024 documented staff monitored and treated Resident #71's facial injuries (bruising, swelling, laceration, scratches) and administered Tylenol as needed for visible signs of pain.
The Medication Administration Record dated 11/1/2024 -11/30/2024 documented Resident #71 was administered Tylenol 500 milligrams nine (9) times for pain between 11/5/2024 and 11/10/2024 after they were struck in the face by Resident #68. Prior to 11/4/2024, Resident #71 had not been receiving pain medication.
During observations on 1/27/2025 between 9:42 AM and 10:01 AM, both Residents #71 and #68 were in their rooms, directly across the hall from each other. Resident #68's door was closed and had a stop sign across their doorway.
During an interview on 1/29/2025 at 11:44 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated Resident #68 did not like people in their personal space and most incidents involving this resident on the unit involved other people entering their room. They stated that if someone got too close to Resident #68, they would become provoked and would attempt to hit the other person. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated they did not know if the stop sign was in place on Resident #68's door on 11/4/2024 at the time of the attack. Additionally, they stated Resident #71 had difficulty hearing, so other residents get frustrated when they tried to talk to them.
During an interview on 1/29/2025 at 11:51 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #1 stated they were at the nurse's station on 11/4/2024 when they saw Resident #71 wheel down the hallway to Resident #68's room, open the door and enter. They then heard yelling and started to walk down the hallway when they saw Resident #68 push Resident #71 out of their room with their walker. Resident #68 had already closed the door and returned to their room when Certified Nurse Aide #1 arrived at the incident. They stated Resident #71 was bleeding from areas on their face that corresponded with where the walker had hit them. Certified Nurse Aide #1 stated they did not recall if the stop sign was across Resident #68's door on 11/4/2024. The unit had a lot of wanderers who would remove stop signs across doors, and staff did their best to redirect residents.
During an observation on 1/30/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident #68 was in their room, the door was closed and there was no stop sign across the entry way. Resident #71 was in their room across the hall watching television.
During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 11:23 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated Resident #71 had swelling, bruising to their face and showed signs of pain for days following the incident, requiring Tylenol to relieve the pain. Additionally, they stated they did not know why the stop sign was missing from Resident #68's doorway. They stated other residents frequently go around the unit and remove them, and staff have to look through rooms to find them.
During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 11:30 AM, Social Worker #1 stated following the incident on 11/4/2024, Resident #71 was assessed, was holding their injuries and appeared to be in pain. Social Worker #1 stated Resident #68 was assessed and sent to the hospital for evaluation of their increased aggression, and upon their return was seen by the facility provider for their behaviors. Their mood fluctuates because of their dementia. They stated if Resident #68 was in a bad mood, they preferred to be alone and that was why they were care planned to have their door shut. Social Worker #1 stated they did not know if the stop sign was across Resident #68's door on 11/4/2024 at the time of the incident.
During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:30 PM, Registered Nurse Head Nurse #2 stated there were stop signs across doorways on the memory care unit to deter residents from entering rooms that were not theirs, but residents removed them and hid them. Staff constantly had to check for stop signs and would replace them when they noticed they were missing.
During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 1:10 PM, the Medical Director stated Resident #68 was evaluated following an incident that included them having aggressive, assaultive behaviors towards Resident #71.
During a telephone interview on 1/30/2025 at 2:06 PM, Registered Nurse #1 stated on 11/4/2024 around 3:00 PM they were paged to the memory care unit. Staff stated they heard screaming and responded to find Resident #68 hitting Resident #71 in the face with their walker. Resident #68 picked the walker up and brought it down on Resident #71's face a couple times. The residents were separated. Resident #71 was assessed, neuro checks were initiated, and first aid was rendered to their facial injuries. Resident #71's Health Care Proxy was called, and they did not want them to be sent to the hospital. The Medical Director was updated and ordered an x-ray of Resident #71's nose and orbitals (eye socket). Registered Nurse #1 that Resident #68 was assessed and was aggressive towards staff, so they were sent to the hospital for an evaluation. Registered Nurse #1 stated that Resident #68 had worsening aggression, behaviors, and confusion in the weeks leading up to the incident. Registered Nurse #1 stated they had been concerned something bad was going to happen. They could just flip a switch. Resident #68 didn't like other people in their personal space and would push people towards the door with their walker if they entered their room. Registered Nurse #1 stated they arrived after the incident and did not know if the stop sign was in place prior to the incident. They stated they had brought their concerns to the Director of Nursing, Administration, and the Medical Director before 11/4/2024 because of Resident #68's history of aggression toward others. Resident #68 had recently been evaluated in the hospital for increased aggression because they were a safety issue to staff and other residents with no findings. Registered Nurse #1 stated Resident #71 was nonverbal, but after the 11/4/2024 incident you could see it on their face, they were worried when wheeling around the unit.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/2025 at 8:32 AM, Resident #68's Health Care Proxy stated they were made aware of the incident on 11/4/2024. They were told there was a physical altercation between Resident #71 and another resident, resulting in a minor cut to Resident #71's cheek. They were not aware Resident #71 was hit in the face with a walker. Resident #71's Health Care Proxy stated that if Resident #71 was in their right mind they would have been very upset at the situation and would have been afraid of the person doing this to them.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/2025 at 8:40 AM, Risk Management Investigator #1 stated they don't typically investigate resident-to-resident incidents. If it's a reportable incident with a major injury, they may work jointly on the investigation. Risk Management Investigator #1 stated they did not work on this case with the facility and would have expected to be notified. A resident striking another resident with a walker causing cuts and swelling to the face would be considered a major injury.
During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 10:40 AM, the Director of Nursing stated they investigated the incident on 11/4/2024 involving Resident #68 and #71. Resident #68 had a history of aggressive behaviors directed towards others. The Director of Nursing stated that Resident #68 was aggressive about Resident #71 entering their room. During the interview, the Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #71's nursing progress notes and stated following the incident, Resident #71 displayed signs of discomfort, was visibly upset, and was medicated for pain. They stated Resident #68 caused harm to Resident #71 during the incident on 11/4/2024.
During an interview on 2/3/2024 at 11:46 AM, the Administrator reviewed Resident #71's nursing progress notes and stated, It is safe to say Resident #71 was exhibiting signs of fear and pain following the incident on 11/4/2024 with Resident #68.
2. Resident #17 had diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with mood disturbance, depression, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #17 was moderately cognitively impaired, was usually understood, and usually understands.
The [NAME] dated 12/6/2024 documented Resident #17 required an assist of one for ambulation with a rolling walker, was independent for wheelchair mobility on the unit, and required 15-minute checks. Facility could not provide a [NAME] for the day of the altercation, 12/5/2024.
The comprehensive care plan dated 9/30/2024 documented Resident #17 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs. The care plan documented on 10/23/2024, the resident physically grabbed and slapped another resident in the hallway. Approaches included to invite to scheduled activities and may need one-to-one visits. The care plan documented on 12/5/2024, the resident was hit by another resident due to going through their things; on 12/10/2024 the resident was slapped by another resident who thought resident had taken their walker. Approaches included to cue, reorient and supervise as needed. Additionally, the care plan documented Resident #17 was found crawling on the floor on 12/11/2024. The 15-minute checks were not documented on the comprehensive care plan.
Resident #75 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Bell's palsy (temporary paralysis or weakness of the facial muscles on one side of the face), and dementia without behavioral disturbance. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #75 was severely cognitively impaired, sometimes understands, was sometimes understood, and had fluctuating disorganized thinking.
The [NAME] dated 12/6/2024 documented Resident #75 was independent with a rolling walker for ambulation on the unit. The [NAME] documented on 12/6/2024, 15-minute checks were initiated. The facility could not provide the [NAME] for the day of the altercation, 12/5/2024.
The comprehensive care plan dated 6/21/2024 documented Resident #75 had a communication problem related to oral deformity, Bell's palsy, and hearing deficits. Resident #75 had impaired cognitive function related to dementia and could be possessive over other residents. On 9/13/2024, Resident #75 hit another resident. Staff were to anticipate the needs of the resident. Resident #75 wandered and had impaired safety awareness. The care plan documented on 12/5/2024, hit another resident for going through their things and the other resident hit back; on 12/10/2024, Resident #75 slapped another resident due to thinking they took their walker. Approaches included a Velcro stop sign across entry way and to cue, reorient and supervise as needed. Fifteen- minute checks were initiated on 12/5/2024 after the altercation but were not documented on the comprehensive care plan.
Review of Resident #17's progress notes dated 12/2/2024 included Social Worker #1 documented a room change occurred on 12/2/2024.
The nursing home facility investigative report, dated 12/5/2024 and completed by the Administrator, documented Resident #75 observed Resident #17 going through their belongings and slapped Resident #17 on the face. Resident #17 slapped Resident #75 back, also on the face. The incident was reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 by Resident #17, and while they were talking to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 about the incident, Resident #75 approached to tell their side of the story. Residents were new roommates, and both were able to ambulate independently. Resident #17 indicated they did not like their living arrangement. Both residents were placed on 15-minute checks to monitor their whereabouts and to avoid further altercations.
The resident-to-resident incident report Resident to Resident Physical Contact for Resident #75 dated 12/10/2024, completed by Registered Nurse Head Nurse #4, documented Resident #75 came out to the dining room and accused Resident #17 of stealing their walker, attempted to take it back, and began hitting Resident #17 on their arms. The residents were separated; 15-minute checks were still in place at the time and continued.
Review of Resident #17's nursing progress notes dated 12/10/2024 at 8:15 AM and 8:19 AM included Licensed Practical Nurse #1 documented they witnessed Resident #75 smack Resident #17 because they thought Resident #17 took their walker. They were separated and placed on opposite sides of the dining room. Resident #17 had a red mark on their left arm and was crying. One-to-one was provided to Resident #17 and 15-minute checks continued.
The resident-to-resident incident report Resident to Resident Physical Contact for Resident #75 dated 12/11/2024, completed by the Assistant Director of Nursing, documented Certified Nurse Aide #10 saw Resident #75 walking towards their room and when they entered, heard Resident #17 say, It is my bathroom too. Certified Nurse Aide #10 heard a noise and went to check. They observed Resident #17 and Resident #75 crawling around on their bedroom floor. Resident #75 stated Resident #17 pulled them down. The incident report documented Resident #17 and #75, who were roommates, had been having difficulty getting along. To avoid further potential negative interaction, Resident #75 was moved to a private room on another unit.
During an interview on 1/27/2025 at 9:51 AM, Resident #17 stated they tended to get upset when they were in group settings. Resident #17 stated they remembered slapping someone because they wouldn't leave them alone, so they had to push them away. Resident #17 appeared paranoid and anxious during the interview.
During an interview on 1/29/2025 at 11:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated Resident #17 and Resident #75 had been arguing for a couple days and had slapped each other. On 12/11/2024 Certified Nurse Aide #10 found them crawling on the floor in their bedroom after slapping each other. They stated Resident #17 seemed afraid of Resident #75.
During an interview on 1/29/2025 at 10:29 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #1 stated Resident #17 and Resident #75 were not a good match for roommates because they each thought someone else was always stealing from them and could be very possessive over things.
During a telephone interview on 1/30/2025 at 2:17 PM, Registered Nurse #1 stated the two residents became roommates because room changes needed to occur to accommodate male beds on the secure unit. Resident #75 also had room change in September because they had an altercation with their previous roommate. Resident #17 recently moved to the secure unit for safety related to their wandering. Registered Nurse #1 stated they were not surprised when the residents had issues after becoming roommates because they both had issues with other residents in the past. Registered Nurse #1 stated they brought up their concerns with them not being compatible roommates at their weekly interdisciplinary meetings with Administration, the Director or Nursing, therapy, dietician, unit managers, and staffing, but there was no other available bed on the secure unit. Resident #75 was eventually moved after the incident on 12/11/2024, and that had helped Resident #17 with their paranoia.
A call was placed to Certified Nurse Aide #10 1/31/2025 at 12:23 PM without success.
During an interview on 2/3/2025 at 10:29 AM, the Director of Nursing stated Resident #17 and Resident #75 were put on 15-minute checks following the incident on 12/5/2024 and remained roommates. There were no available beds on the secure unit, and they were attempting to keep both residents on the secure unit. They stated the incident that occurred on 12/10/2024 happened in the dining room, so it did not indicate a room change. The incident on 12/11/2024 was not witnessed, so they only had the residents' account. They eventually moved Resident #75 off the secure unit after the incident on 12/11/2024 to avoid further conflict.
NYCRR 415.4(b)(1)(i)
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00341814) during an extended S...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00341814) during an extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/25, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for one (1) (Resident #161) of one (1) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, the certified nurse aide provided care despite the resident's refusal and resulted in Resident #161 feeling ashamed and humiliated.
The finding is:
The policy and procedure titled Resident Choice and Rights last revised 1/2023 documented it is the policy of this facility to provide and encourage resident choices in all aspects of their care and daily routines to maintain their dignity, individualism and customary routines.
Your Rights as A Nursing Home Resident in New York State dated 2022 documented as a resident in this facility, you have rights guaranteed to you by state and federal laws. This facility is required to protect and promote your rights. Your rights strongly emphasize individual dignity and self-determination, promoting your independence and enhancing your quality of life. You have a right to be valued as an individual, to be treated with consideration, dignity and respect in full recognition of your self-worth. You have the right to accept or refuse care and treatment.
Resident #161 had diagnoses including anxiety, fractured right humorous (upper arm), and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 5/10/24 documented that Resident #161 was cognitively intact, was understood and understands.
The comprehensive care plan dated 5/3/24 documented Resident #161 had bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility. The care plan included incontinence checks as needed.
The [NAME] Report (guide used by staff to provide care) dated 5/9/24 documented Resident #161 required the assistance of two staff members for toileting and did not reflect incontinence care.
The Risk Management Investigation dated 7/1/24 documented at approximately 3:00 AM on 7/1/24, Certified Nurse Aide #4 touched Resident #161 in the genital area without announcing their presence. When Resident #161 told Certified Nurse Aide #4 to remove their hand, Certified Nurse Aide #4 continued touching Resident #161 and stated to Resident #161 they were checking their brief to ensure they were dry. Later that morning at approximately 5:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #4 provided personal hygiene care to Resident #161, despite Resident #161 wanting to complete their own care. While washing Resident #161's genital area, Certified Nurse Aide #4 told Resident #161 they were checking for disease. Resident #161 told Registered Nurse #6 they were sleeping and startled by Certified Nurse Aide #4's grabbing and tugging at their brief at 3:00 AM and told Certified Nurse Aide #4 to get their hand out of there. Certified Nurse Aide #4 continued to move their hand around on their private area. Later that same morning at approximately 5:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #4 assisted Resident #161 with morning care and stated Certified Nurse Aide #4 was insistent in trying to get Resident #161's clothing off. Resident #161 repeatedly told Certified Nurse Aide #4 that I do that myself, please stop, but Certified Nurse Aide #4 kept insisting. Certified Nurse Aide #4 then spread Resident #161's legs apart and told them that they were looking for disease and looked at Resident #161's peri area. Registered Nurse #6 reported Resident #161 was crying, was very embarrassed. Resident #161 required assistance for transferring but preferred to be independent for most things and will ring the bell when they required assistance to use the toilet.
During an interview on 1/31/25 at 11:43 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #7 stated Licensed Practical Nurse # 5 requested they go and check on Resident #161 on the morning of 7/1/24. Resident #161 was sobbing and felt offended that Certified Nurse Aide #4 would treat them like that. It was Resident #161's right to refuse care. Certified Nurse Aide #7 stated the resident felt disrespected, ashamed and expressed that Certified Nurse Aide #4's treatment towards Resident #161 was undignified.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 12:19 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 stated providing care when they don't want the care was demeaning. Resident #161 had the right to refuse care.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 1:57 PM, Registered Nurse #6 stated Certified Nurse Aide #4's actions on 7/1/24 were inappropriate and they should have stopped care on both occasions.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 8:52 AM, Social Worker #1 stated they would have expected that Certified Nurse Aide #4 to have stopped care right away, report to the nurse, and reapproach later. Certified Nurse Aide #4's violated Resident #161's choice not to have care and it was undignified.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:33 AM, the Director of Nursing stated placing your hands on someone inappropriately without talking to them even after they told you to stop was a dignity concern. Resident #161 felt reluctant to discuss the care they had received on the morning of 7/1/24. Certified Nurse Aide #4 violated Resident 161's rights to be treated with dignity and respect.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/25 at 1:45 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #4 denied the allegations and stated they would not force care on a resident that didn't want it. Certified Nurse Aide #4 stated that would be disrespectful.
10NYCRR 415.3 (2)(f)(ii)
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00341814, #NY00354482, #NY003...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (#NY00341814, #NY00354482, #NY00363961) during an extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/25, the facility did not ensure that all residents care plans were implemented as planned, consistent with resident's rights and meet their preferences, goals and medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (Residents # 30, 42, & 161) of three resident's reviewed. Specifically, care plan interventions were not followed by staff. Issues included: protective sleeves (#30), and shorts (#42) were not provided as planned, and a side rail was left in the up position when care was not being provided (#161) all breaks in implementation resulted in minor injuries.
The findings are:
The policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plans last revised 10/23 documented it is the responsibility off all staff that are providing hands on care to consult and follow the Comprehensive Care Plan and [NAME]. All staff are trained upon orientation and annually that compliance with all directives on a resident's care plan/[NAME] are expected to be followed at all times.
1. Resident #30 had diagnoses including dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, and dermatitis. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 7/29/24 documented Resident #30 was moderately cognitive impaired, was sometimes understood and sometimes understands. They required partial/moderate assistance with upper body dressing.
The comprehensive care plan dated 7/23/24 documented Resident #30 had fragile skin and had the potential for impaired skin integrity. The planned interventions included one assist for dressing and bilateral arm (protective sleeves) while out of bed.
The [NAME] Report (a guide used by staff to provide care) with an as of date of 9/16/24 documented bilateral (both) arm (protective sleeves) on in the morning and off at bedtime.
Review the facility accident and incident investigation dated 9/13/24 completed by Registered Nurse #4 documented at 10:00 AM, Resident #30 was not wearing the (protective sleeves) and sustained a skin tear to their right forearm while repositioning themselves in their wheelchair.
Review of the nursing progress notes dated 9/13/24, Registered Nurse #4 documented at 10:29 AM Resident #30 rearranged themselves in their wheelchair, hit their right upper arm on the arm rest, and sustained a skin tear.
Review of the Risk Management Nursing Home Investigation dated 9/16/24 documented Certified Nurse Aide #5 did not provide Resident #30's (protective sleeves) on 9/13/24. The care plan violation resulted in a skin tear to Resident #30's right upper arm.
During an observation and interview on 1/28/25 at 9:50 AM, Resident #30 was wearing (protective sleeves) on both arms with long sleeves and stated the sleeves protected their skin so if they bumped into things, the skin protectors prevented their skin from splitting as their skin was frail.
During an interview on 1/31/25 at 12:36 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #5 stated they were aware Resident #30's care plan reflected the (protective sleeves) to protect their skin from injury and checked the care plan prior to care for resident safety. They provided personal care on 9/13/24 for Resident #30. The (protective sleeves) were not in Resident #30's room, then got pulled to another unit during care and putting the (protective sleeves) on slipped my mind.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 12:19 PM, Registered Nurse #4 stated following the care plan prevented injuries to the residents. Certified Nurse Aide #5 should have informed the nurse the (protective sleeves) were missing. Having the (protective sleeves) on may have prevented the skin tear. All staff were responsible for following the care plan.
2. Resident #42 had diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairments, was rarely understood and rarely understands. Resident #42 was dependent on staff assistance for dressing.
The comprehensive care plan revised on 3/9/22 documented Resident #42 had an activity of daily living self-care deficit. Interventions included one staff assist for turning and repositioning, shorts on at all times and one staff assistance for lower body dressing.
The [NAME] Report dated 12/6/24 documented Resident #42 was to have shorts on at all times, under both bed mobility and dressing categories.
Review of the self-inflicted injury report dated 12/6/24, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 documented there were three scratches to the Resident #42's left hip. The scratches were cleansed, and shorts were applied to protect the resident's skin from self-inflicting wounds. Resident #42 had a long history of scratching themselves and was care planned to wear shorts in bed for prevention; the shorts were not placed on Resident #42 during the shift prior.
Review of the Risk Management Nursing Home Investigation with a received date of 12/6/24 documented that on 12/6/24 Resident #42 was found to have three linear self-inflicted scratches on their left hip, and they were not wearing their shorts at that time. Investigator #1 documented an interview with Certified Nurse Aide #4 on 12/10/24. Certified Nurse Aide #4 gave a statement they were not familiar with Resident #42, were overwhelmed, and did not review the care plan prior to providing nightly care. They did not place shorts on Resident #42. Investigator #1 documented Certified Nurse Aide #4 did not follow the care plan.
During an observation on 1/29/25 at 3:44 PM, Resident #42 was sitting up in their chair. They were holding onto the bottom of their shirt in one hand and their sweatpants with the other hand. While holding their clothes, they were moving their fingers and feeling their clothing.
During an observation and interview on 1/30/25 at 9:10 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #8 provided incontinent care to Resident #42. They placed shorts back on Resident #42 after completion. They stated the care plan included that Resident #42 should always wear shorts and Resident #42 wears the shorts because they had a tendency of scratching themselves.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 10:19 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #2 stated they were not familiar with Resident #42 but looked at the care plan that night (12/6/24) to see what type of assistance they needed. They noticed Resident #42 did not have their shorts on, but soon after both Licensed Practical Nurse #3 and Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 went to check on Resident #42.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 1:24 PM, Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 stated they were supervising the night Resident #42 was found without their shorts on and scratch marks on their left hip (12/6/24). They stated Resident #42 had a history of scratching and digging at themselves and that was why they wore shorts at all times. When they arrived at the unit to assess Resident #42, they were digging at their left leg and that was where the scratch marks were. They were superficial marks, were cleansed, shorts were applied, and the administration were notified via electronic mail.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/25 at 9:08 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #3 stated Resident #42 was always moving their hands, grabbing, and scratching wherever they could reach. They stated on 12/6/24 they remembered going into the room with Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, Resident #42 did not have on their shorts like care planned and there were scratch marks on their left hip. They stated there was a break in the care plan at that point and the shift prior should have placed the shorts on Resident #42 for their safety.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/25 at 9:16 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #3 stated they assisted Certified Nurse Aide #2 with their rounds, noticed Resident #42 did not have shorts on, had scratches to their hip, and then notified Licensed Practical Nurse #3 immediately after care. They stated the care plan showed that Resident #42 should have shorts on at all times and the shift prior must not have placed shorts on Resident #42. When they looked in Resident #42's drawer, there were plenty of shorts in the drawer.
A telephone call and voicemail were left for Certified Nurse Aide #4 on 1/31/25 at 10:48 AM and on 2/3/25 at 8:19 AM with no return call.
3. Resident #161 had diagnoses including anxiety, fractured right humorous (upper arm), and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data dated 5/10/24 documented that Resident #161 was cognitively intact, was understood and understands. They required substantial/maximum assistance for bed mobility and bed rails were not used.
The comprehensive care plan dated 5/3/24 documented Resident #161 had an activity of daily living self-deficit, and the left side rail may be left up during care. Resident #161 required assistance from two staff members for bed mobility. The comprehensive care plan further documented that Resident #161 had a skin tear on 5/9/24.
The [NAME] Report dated 5/9/24 documented Resident #161 required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and the side rails up during care.
Review the facility accident and incident investigation dated 5/9/24 Registered Nurse #7 documented at 1:14 AM, Resident #161 was sitting on the edge of their bed and blood was on the floor and siderail. Resident #161 stated to Registered Nurse #7 they hit their arm on the siderail which was only to be raised during care. Resident #161 sustained a skin tear to the left lateral forearm. There were no measurements of the skin tear documented on the accident and incident investigation.
Message left for Registered Nurse #7 on 1/31/25 at 9:04 AM with no returned response.
Review of the risk management nursing home investigation dated 5/9/24 documented at 1:14 AM that a skin tear was discovered to Resident #161 left lateral forearm from bumping their arm on the siderail of their bed, which was in the raised position. Resident #161's care plan instructed that the side rails of the bed should only be up during care. At the time of the injury Resident #161 was not receiving care and therefore the siderails should have been down.
During intermittent observations from 1/27/25 through 1/31/25 between the hours of 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM and on 2/3/25 between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM there were no care plan violations noted related to the use of siderails.
During an interview on 1/31/25 at 10:33 AM, Certified Nurse Aide #7 stated they didn't recall the incident on 5/9/24. Care plans were checked at the start of the shift to properly care for the residents. When the care plan specified for the siderails to be up during care they should have been up during care. Otherwise, the siderails should be down. It was a long time ago.
During an interview on 1/31/25 at 12:19 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 stated Certified Nurse Aide #7 should have reviewed the care plan and put the side rail down, then the skin tear could have been avoided.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:36 AM, the Director of Nursing stated their expectation was for all nursing staff including Certified Nurse Aides, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Registered Nurses to review the care plan prior to providing care and to follow the care plan.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 12:39 AM, Registered Nurse #3, former Inservice Coordinator stated following the care plan was covered in new employee orientation and reviewed annually with mandatory trainings. All staff were expected to review the resident care plan before touching a resident to ensure they provided the care they need to provide.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:00 PM, Registered Nurse #4 stated Resident #161 bumping their arm on the siderail was a care plan violation and Certified Nurse Aide #7 should have made sure the siderail was down upon leaving the room.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:32 PM, the Administrator stated not following the care plan could affect a resident wellbeing.
10 NYCRR 415.11 (c) (1)
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review conducted during an a Complaint investigation (#NY00330289, #NY00331807, #NY00341814, #NY00354482, #NY00357719, #NY00359779, #NY00363581, and #NY00363961) during t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review conducted during an a Complaint investigation (#NY00330289, #NY00331807, #NY00341814, #NY00354482, #NY00357719, #NY00359779, #NY00363581, and #NY00363961) during the extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/25, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures for screening employees, that would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. In addition the facility did not ensure their abuse reporting policy and procedures were updated to include current regulations and guidance. Specifically, the facility did not ensure their policy for abuse reporting was current. This affected 10 (Residents #17, 30, 42, 47, 68, 71, 72, 75, 95, and #161) of 12 residents reviewed. Additionally, one (Employee #4, agency Licensed Practical Nurse) of seven employees that worked in the facility and were subject to the New York State Nurse Aide Registry Verification, was not reviewed through the New York State Nurse Aide Registry prior to their employment as required. This resulted in no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm with the likelihood to affect all residents and is substandard quality of care.
The findings are:
REFER TO:
F 609 - Reporting of Alleged Violations
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process dated 12/2015 documented at any time when a visitor or staff member witnesses or is made aware of possible resident abuse or neglect, the following procedure must be implements: The employee will report the incident to the Registered Nurse Nursing Supervisor immediately and will initiate an Incident/Accident Report. The Nursing Supervisor will notify the Administrator and Nursing Director. The Administrator and/or Nursing Director will take responsibility for notifying the State Health Department within five working days that resident abuse/neglect has occurred.
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 9/2023 documented, all facility applicants will be screened by the hiring manager or their designee for abuse by checking the on-line New York Nurse Aide Registry Prometric.com and printing a copy of the report for submission with all new hire paperwork prior to the first day of employment. All non-licensed staff will be finger-printed per New York State Department of Health regulations via the Criminal History Check module of the New York State Health Commerce System (HCS). The policy did not include a timeline of when the New York State Department of Health was to be notified.
1. Review of the State Operational Manuals issued 11/22/2017 and 8/8/2024 documented to Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 10:21 AM, the Director of Nursing stated the most recent Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process policy and procedure was last revised in December 2015. They stated the policies were reviewed at the facility.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:36 AM, the Director of Nursing stated they rely on the Risk Management Team to do the investigation and rule out abuse or neglect when staff were involved. They stated policies were reviewed a couple time of month during a meeting that included the Director of Nursing, Administrator, Medical Records, Inservice Coordinator/Infection Preventionist and sometimes the Assistant Director of Nursing. Policies were reviewed and updated based on Quality Assurance projects. They stated they were unaware of the updated regulations for reporting allegations of suspected abuse/neglect and expected a big email or a Dear Administrator Letter would have been sent to the Administrator or themselves.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:31 PM, the Administrator stated they would usually get updated on new and changes in regulations through letters posted in the secure online system that allows New York State health department, providers, and facilities to share health information and there were a lot of changes between 2020 and 2024. They believed the change in the regulation for reporting was in 2022 and they must have missed that specific letter. Their policy was last reviewed in 2015 and should have been updated by the Policy and Procedure Team. The Policy and Procedure Team were responsible for updating policies and procedures included the Administrator and Director of Nursing. They stated the policy should have been updated so the facility could stay within compliance of state guidelines.
2. Review of the employee file for Employee #4's (agency Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed the employee was hired on 12/15/24.
Review of the timesheets provided by the facility revealed Employee #4 had worked in the facility on:
- 12/15/24 from 1:30 PM to 10:45 PM.
- 12/21/24 from 1:45 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 12/22/24 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 12/25/24 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 12/28/24 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 12/29/24 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/1/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/4/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/5/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/11/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/12/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/18/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/19/25 from 2:00 PM to 10:30 PM.
- 1/25/25 from 2:00 PM to 11:15 PM.
During an interview on 1/29/24 at 2:20 PM, the Administrator (Authorized Person for Criminal History record Check) and the Infection Control/ In-Service Coordinator (Authorized Person for Criminal History record Check) stated employee #4 was hired to work at the facility as a Licensed Practical Nurse. The New York State Department of Health will be notified by the Nursing Director and/or Administrator when there is reasonable cause to believe that abuse has occurred.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 9:16 AM the Administrator stated the facility had no documentation that a New York State Nurse Aide Registry Verification report had been completed for Employee #4 prior to their employment at the facility.
10 NYCRR 415.4(b)
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Complaint investigations (#NY00330289, #NY00359779, #NY00363581, #NY003...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Complaint investigations (#NY00330289, #NY00359779, #NY00363581, #NY00341814, #NY00354482, #NY00331807, #NY00357719, #NY00363961) completed during an extended Standard survey on 2/3/25, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for 10 (#17, #30, #42, #47, #68, #71, #72, #75, #95 and #161) of 12 residents reviewed. Specifically, allegations of resident abuse (#47, #68, #71, #17, #75, #72, and #161) and injuries of unknown origin (# 95) were not reported within 2 hours to State Agency. Additionally, resident neglect (#30, #42 and #161) was not reported within 24 hours to the State Agency. This resulted in no actual harm with the potential to affect all residents that is substandard quality of care.
The findings are:
The policy and procedures titled Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process dated 12/2015, documented it is the policy of the facility to comply with all State and Federal regulations with regards to abuse and neglect. The New York State Department of Health will be notified of any resident abuse or neglect, whether suspected or confirmed. The Nursing Supervisor will notify the Administrator and Nursing Director. The Administrator will notify the Social Worker. The Administrator and/or Nursing Director will take responsibility for notifying the State Health Department within five working days that abuse/neglect has occurred.
a. Resident #47 had diagnoses including morbid obesity, depression, and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/17/24 documented Resident #47 was cognitively intact.
The nursing home facility investigation report submitted successfully to the State Agency competed by the Administrator documented that Resident #47 reported to Social Worker #1 that Certified Nurse Aide #9 had touched them inappropriately during incontinent care a couple days prior. The incident was documented to have occurred on 10/15/24 at 2:00 PM, staff was first made aware on 10/17/24 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator was first made aware on 10/17/24 at 3:00 PM and reported the allegation to the State Agency on 10/18/24 at 1:46 PM.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/25 at 8:26 AM, Investigator #1 stated they were notified of Resident #47's allegation on 10/17/24. They considered this allegation to be one of sexual abuse and should have been reported to the State Agency within two hours.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:33 AM, the Director of Nursing stated being inappropriately touched was considered sexual abuse. They stated the facility investigative report documented the incident was submitted to the State Agency on 10/18/24 at 1:46 PM and it should have been reported sooner because it was a potential abuse allegation.
b. Resident #68 had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness, and agitation. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #68 was severely cognitively impaired
Resident #71 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (lung disease that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breath), dementia without behavioral disturbance, and depression. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #71 was severely cognitively impaired.
Review of the resident-to-resident incident reports for Resident #71 and Resident #68 completed by Registered Nurse #1, and the facility's investigation report completed by the Director of Nursing dated 11/4/2024, revealed at 2:45 PM Resident #71 was propelling their wheelchair down the hallway when they opened Resident #68's room door and started to enter. Resident #68 met Resident #71 in the doorway, lifted their walker to Resident #71's face, and began pushing them out of their room. Resident #71 began yelling, which alerted staff, who then immediately intervened and separated the two (2) residents. Resident #71 sustained a skin tear to their right cheek and chin and a laceration across the bridge of their nose with a moderate amount of bloody drainage. Bruising was also noted across their nose. Resident #71 was visibly upset and showed moderate signs of pain and discomfort. Tylenol was given, the wounds were cleansed, and steri-strips (thin, sticky bandages applied to skin to help cuts or wounds stay closed) were applied to their right cheek and nose, along with a dry clean dressing to their chin. X-rays were obtained and were negative for any fractures. Resident #68 became aggressive towards staff and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The reports documented Resident #68 had a history of aggression towards other residents and staff, had a private room for safety, and the door was kept shut. The resident-to-resident reports and the facility investigation report did not document the stop sign was in place across Resident #68's door at the time of the abuse on 11/4/2024.
The nursing home facility investigation report was submitted successfully to the State Agency on 11/6/24 at 3:18 PM by the Director of Nursing.
During an interview on 1/29/25 at 1:56 PM, the Director of Nursing stated the facility had 48 hours to submit a report so that is why this incident was reported and submitted on 11/6/24.
c. Resident #95 had diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and a fracture of right wrist. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #95 was severely cognitively impaired.
Review of a facility report titled, Incident-by-Incident Type, dated 12/20/23 at 12:21 PM submitted by the Director of Nursing documented Resident #95 had an injury of unknown source (acute fracture of fourth finger right hand) identified on 12/19/23 at 11:29 AM.
The nursing home facility investigation report submitted successfully to the State Agency on Wednesday 12/20/2023 at 2:31 PM by the Director of Nursing for allegations of injury of unknown source (acute fracture of fourth finger right hand). The report documented the incident occurred was on Tuesday 12/19/23 at 11:29 AM. The Administrator was first made aware of the incident on Wednesday 12/20/23 at 12:13 PM.
d. Resident #17 had diagnoses include including dementia with mood disturbance, depression, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #17 was moderately cognitively impaired.
Resident #75 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Bell's Palsy (weakness in the muscles in one side of the face). The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #75 was severely cognitively impaired.
The nursing home facility investigation report submitted successfully to the State Agency dated 12/5/24, completed by Administrator, documented Resident #75 observed Resident #17 going through their belongings and slapped Resident #17 on the face. Resident #17 slapped Resident #75 back, also on the face. The incident was reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 by Resident #17, and while they were talking to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 about the incident, Resident #75 approached to tell their side of the story. Residents are new roommates, and both are able to ambulate independently. Resident #17 indicated they did not like their living arrangement. Both residents were placed on 15-minute checks to monitor their whereabouts and avoid further altercations.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 10:29 AM, the Director of Nursing stated the incident between Resident #17 and Resident #75 occurred on 12/5/24 at 7:45 AM, they were made aware at 8:30 AM. They stated they reported the incident to the State Agency on 12/6/24 at 2:06 PM, over 48 hours from when the incident occurred. They stated the incident should have been reported within 24 hours.
Review of resident-to-resident incident report Resident to Resident Physical Contact for Resident #75 dated 12/10/24, completed by Registered Nurse Head Nurse #4, documented Resident #75 came out to the dining room and accused Resident #17 of stealing their walker, attempted to take it and began hitting Resident #17 on their arms. Residents were separated, 15-minute checks were still in place at the time and continued.
Review of resident-to-resident incident report for Resident #75 dated 12/11/24, completed by Assistant Director of Nursing, documented Certified Nurse Aide #10 saw Resident #75 walking towards their room and when they entered, heard Resident #17 say it is my bathroom too, heard a noise and went to check on it. They observed Resident #17 and Resident #75 crawling around on their bedroom floor. Resident #75 stated Resident #17 pulled them down. The incident report documented Resident #17 and #75 had been having difficulty getting along, and they were roommates. To avoid further potential negative interaction, Resident #75 was moved to a private room on another unit.
Review of State Agency computerized reporting/tracking system data base on 2/3/25 revealed there were no further facility reported incidents involving Resident #17 and Resident #75.
During an interview on 1/29/25 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing stated the documents provided to survey team were the extent of what the facility had regarding the incidents on 12/10/24 and 12/11/24 between Resident's #75 and #17.
e. Resident #72 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation (an irregular contracting of the upper chambers that can cause the blood to pool) and peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation in the lower extremities.) The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #72 was cognitively intact
The nursing home facility investigation report submitted successfully to the State Agency documented on 1/18/24 at 8:30 AM Resident #72 reported to Registered Nurse Supervisor #4 an incident of alleged verbal and mental abuse by a staff member that occurred on 1/8/24 at 11:00 PM. The report documented the Administrator submitted the report on 1/18/24 at 2:43 PM to the State Agency.
f. Resident #42 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment.
The undated nursing home facility investigative report completed by the Director of Nursing documented that Resident #42 was found not to be wearing their shorts per their care plan and had three scratch marks to their left hip. The incident was documented to have occurred on 12/6/24 at 2:08 AM, staff were first made aware of the incident at 12/6/24 at 2:08 AM, the Administrator was first made aware on 12/6/24 at 2:31 AM. The incident was reported to the State Agency on 12/9/24 at 3:06 PM.
During a telephone interview on 2/3/25 at 8:33 AM, Investigator #1 stated they were not responsible for notifying the State Agency but thought care plan violations needed to be reported within 24 hours.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:36 AM, the Director of Nursing stated on 12/6/24 staff did not follow a resident's care plan; there was an injury which made the incident reportable. They stated the facility investigative report documented administration was notified on 12/6/24 at 2:31 AM. The Director of Nursing stated this type of incident needed to be reported to the State Agency within 48 hours because it was a care plan violation. The Director of Nursing stated they used the 2016 Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual to decide what was reported and when.
g. Resident #30 had diagnoses including dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, and dermatitis. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #30 was moderately cognitive impaired.
The facility accident and incident investigation dated 9/13/24 at 10:00 AM documented that while Resident #30 was repositioning themselves in their wheelchair they hit their arm on the armrest and sustained a skin tear to the right forearm at. The facility accident and incident investigation documented that Resident #30 did not have on their protective arm sleeves.
Review of the Risk Management Nursing Home Investigation dated 9/16/24 documented a skin tear occurred on 9/13/24 at 10:00 AM. The Director of Nursing was not made aware until they received a counseling slip for Certified Nurse Aide #5 on 9/16/24 in their mailbox. The Director of Nursing reported the injury related to the care plan violation to the State agency on 9/16/24.
Review of the State Agency computerized reporting/tracking system data base report submitted on 9/16/24 at 3:00 PM, revealed Resident #30 sustained a skin tear on 9/13/24 at 10:00 AM due to not having their protective sleeves on per their plan of care.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 1:29 PM, Investigator #2 stated they were notified on 9/16/24 by the Director of Nursing about the care plan violation. The incident occurred on 9/13/24 at 10:00 AM and was determined to be neglect. Investigator #2 does not advise the facility to report or not to report incidents and was the facility's responsibility.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 10:09 AM, the Director of Nursing stated care plan violations that did not involve serious bodily injury needed to be reported within forty-eight hours to the State Agency. This incident was not reported until 9/16/24.
h. Resident #161 had diagnoses including anxiety, fractured right humorous (upper arm), and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #161 was cognitively intact.
a. The accident and incident investigation dated 5/9/24 documented at 1:14 PM Resident #161 was sitting on the edge of their bed, bumped their left lateral forearm on the siderail which was in the up position and sustained a skin tear. Per the investigation it was revealed the side rail should have been down when care was not being provided. Certified Nurse Aide #12 left the siderail up after care which resulted in the injury.
Review of the State Agency computerized reporting/tracking system data base revealed the incident was submitted to the Department of Health on 5/10/24 at 2:17 PM by the nursing home Administrator.
The undated Nursing Home Facility Incident Report documented the incident was submitted to the Department of Health on 5/10/24 at 2:17 PM by the Administrator. The allegation type specified other, and the incident was the result of a care plan violation. The incident occurred on 5/9/24 at 1:14 PM and the Administrator was made aware on 5/9/24 at 8:00PM. The facility risk management team was notified to begin a formal investigation.
The Risk Management Nursing Home Investigation with a received date of 5/9/24 documented that Resident #161 had sustained a skin tear after bumping their arm on the siderail which was in the raised position. The care plan reflected the siderail be in up position during care only. At the time of the injury no care was being provided and the skin tear was the result of the care plan violation.
b. The undated Nursing Home Facility Incident Report documented the incident was submitted to the Department of Health on 7/1/24 at 9:44 PM by the Director of Nursing. The allegation type was listed as sexual abuse. The incident date was 7/1/24 and occurred at 2:30 AM. The staff were made aware of the allegation on 7/1/24 at 6:00 AM. The Administrator was made aware on 7/1/24 at 8:25 PM. The report concluded that Certified Nurse Aide #4 continued providing Resident #161 care despite Resident #161 refusal of incontinence care and unwanted touching. The risk management team was notified and would conduct a full investigation.
Review of the State Agency computerized Complaint/Incident Investigation Report revealed an alleged allegation of sexual abuse occurred on 7/1/24 at 2:30 AM. Staff were made aware of the incident at 6:00 AM and the Administrator was notified on 7/1/24 at 9:44 PM and reported the incident to the State Agency at 9:45 PM.
During a telephone interview on 1/31/25 at 1:23 PM, Investigator #1 stated the alleged sexual abuse allegation should have been reported by the facility to the State Agency within two hours.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nursing stated they ruled the care plan violations as unintentional for both Resident #30 on 9/13/24 and #161 on 5/9/24, and thought they had forty-eight hours to report them to the State Agency. The Director of Nursing stated not following the care plan would be neglect. The sexual abuse allegation on 7/1/24 for Resident #161 should have been reported to the State Agency no later than 4:30 AM and was not.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:31 PM, the Administrator stated abuse was any allegation of mistreatment including sexual, financial, physical, verbal; anything that potentially could cause harm whether physical or psychosocial. The Administrator, Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing were responsible to initiate the initial report of abuse or neglect to the State Agency. They stated they were following guidance from 2015/2016 for reporting and were not aware of the current regulation and guidance.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:32 PM, the Administrator stated their reporting policy had not been updated since 2015 and it should have been to ensure they were compliance with current regulations.
10NYCRR 415.4 (b)(1)
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review conducted during an extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/2025, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review conducted during an extended Standard survey completed on 2/3/2025, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility must operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. The facility must have a governing body, or designated persons functioning as a governing body, that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility; and the governing body is responsible and accountable for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program. Specifically, the administration did not ensure abuse and neglect reporting policies and procedures were updated and consistently implemented. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.
The findings are:
REFER TO:
F 600 - Free from Abuse and Neglect
F 607 - Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Polices
F 609 - Reporting Alleged Violations
Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process dated 12/2015 documented at any time when a visitor or staff member witnesses or is made aware of possible resident abuse or neglect, the following procedure must be implements: The employee will report the incident to the Nursing Supervisor immediately and will initiate an Incident/Accident Report. The Nursing Supervisor will notify the Administrator and Nursing Director. The Administrator and/or Nursing Director will take responsibility for notifying the State Health Department within five working days that resident abuse/neglect has occurred.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 10:21 AM, the Director of Nursing stated the most recent Abuse/Neglect - Reporting Process policy and procedure was last revised in December 2015.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:36 AM, the Director of Nursing stated they rely on the Risk Management Team to do the investigation and rule out abuse or neglect when staff were involved. They stated policies were reviewed a couple time of month during a meeting that included the Director of Nursing, Administrator, Medical Records, Inservice Coordinator/Infection Preventionist and sometimes the Assistant Director of Nursing. Policies were reviewed and updated based on Quality Assurance projects. They stated they were unaware of the updated regulations for reporting allegations of suspected abuse/neglect and expected a big email or a Dear Administrator Letter would have been sent to the Administrator or themselves
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:31 PM, the Administrator stated they would usually get updated on new and changes in regulations through letters posted in the secure online system that allows New York State health department, providers, and facilities to share health information and there were a lot of changes between 2020 and 2024. They believed the change in the regulation for reporting was in 2022 and they must have missed that specific letter. Their policy was last reviewed in 2015 and should have been updated by the Policy and Procedure Team. The Policy and Procedure Team were responsible for updating policies and procedures included the Administrator and Director of Nursing. They stated the policy should have been updated so the facility could stay within compliance of state guidelines.
During an interview on 2/3/25 at 3:28 PM, County Legislature #1 stated they were part of the governing board that oversees the facility. They stated they believed the Administrator was updating their policies and procedures, as expected. County Legislature #1 stated it was expected all policies and procedure were reviewed and updated because they should be up to date with the current regulations.
10 NYCRR 415.26