Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the quality of care provided. This facility ranks #311 out of 417 in North Carolina, placing it in the bottom half of all state nursing homes, and #21 out of 29 in Mecklenburg County, meaning only a few local options are better. While the facility is showing some improvement, having reduced issues from 7 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, it still faces serious staffing challenges, with only 1 out of 5 stars for staffing and concerningly low RN coverage, being worse than 99% of other facilities in North Carolina. Despite having a very low staff turnover rate, the facility has encountered critical issues, such as failing to properly clean and disinfect shared blood glucose meters, which poses a risk of infection, and not discarding expired food in kitchens, potentially affecting residents' meals. Overall, while there are some positive aspects, such as the low staff turnover, the serious deficiencies and low trust grade raise significant red flags for families considering this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- F
- In North Carolina
- #311/417
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $38,376 in fines. Higher than 91% of North Carolina facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below North Carolina average (2.8)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
7 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have systems in place to ensure Nurse #1 received the most recent training provided by the facility for blood glucose...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0553
(Tag F0553)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to invite a resident to participate in the planning...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to have a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage letter (NOMNC) signed prior to dischar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove expired medications available for use from the refrigerator of a medication storage room in 1 of 3 medication rooms reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date leftover food items stored for use in the dry goods storage area and walk-in cooler and failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, resident, family and staff interviews the facility failed to provide communication to a re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the admission Minimum Data Set ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain and honor a resident'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to resolve group grievances that were brought to resident council meetings for 4 consecutive months (February, Marc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans in the areas of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired food items in the 2 of 2 freezers, 1 of 4 refrigerators, 1 of 1 dry storage room of satellite kitchen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $38,376 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $38,376 in fines. Higher than 94% of North Carolina facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center during 2023 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 12 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center?
Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
How Does Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center has been fined $38,376 across 1 penalty action. The North Carolina average is $33,463. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Asbury Health And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Asbury Health and Rehabilitation Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.