Accordius Health at Concord

515 Lake Concord Road NE, Concord, NC 28025 (704) 784-4494
For profit - Corporation 120 Beds SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER Data: November 2025 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#307 of 417 in NC
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Accordius Health at Concord has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality of care. It ranks #307 out of 417 nursing homes in North Carolina, placing it in the bottom half, and #4 out of 7 in Cabarrus County, meaning there are only three better options locally. While the facility is showing signs of improvement, with issues decreasing from 9 in 2023 to 8 in 2024, it still has serious problems, including a high staff turnover rate of 67%, which is above the state average. Alarmingly, the facility has incurred $129,204 in fines, reflecting repeated compliance issues, and it offers less RN coverage than 77% of North Carolina facilities, which is concerning. Recent inspections revealed critical incidents, such as staff live-streaming a resident's personal care without consent, which violated the resident's privacy and rights, and failure to report and intervene in instances of abuse. Overall, while there are some positive trends, the facility has significant weaknesses that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In North Carolina
#307/417
Bottom 27%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
9 → 8 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$129,204 in fines. Lower than most North Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for North Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 9 issues
2024: 8 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below North Carolina average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 67%

20pts above North Carolina avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $129,204

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (67%)

19 points above North Carolina average of 48%

The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record

6 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Dec 2024 8 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and responsible party, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and responsible party, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews the facility failed to protect a resident's privacy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). Nurse aide (NA) # 1 and NA # 2 provided personal care to Resident # 2 while live streaming on a cell phone. The staff allowed a prison inmate who was watching the live stream to view the resident while the resident was naked from the waist up and while care was provided; the staff allowed this live streaming while other inmates were observed in the open area behind him. As Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired, the reasonable person concept was applied. A reasonable person would have been traumatized and have feelings of worthlessness, powerlessness and dehumanization through people that were not caregivers viewing them naked and while care was provided without consent. Immediate jeopardy began on 10/4/24 when Resident #2's privacy was violated. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/5/24 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at the scope and severity of D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is immediate jeopardy) to ensure education is completed and monitoring systems put into place and are effective. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, Alzheimer's, dementia, and mood disturbance. Review of Resident #2s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of video footage provided by the Sheriff Department revealed the following events took place on 10/04/24 at 10:30 PM. The video revealed NA #1 and NA #2 located in a facility in the resident's room on live stream video through a cell phone with a prison inmate. The inmate was observed talking into a telephone receiver in an open area with several other inmates behind him. The inmate was looking at the live stream. The video was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 4:45 PM. The following was found and documented by the time mm:ss (minutes colon seconds) where mm represents minutes and ss represents seconds. -:01 Video starts with NA #1 walking down the facility hallway towards Resident #2's room. No residents were shown at this time. -:33 NA #1 entered Resident #2's room. -:45 NA #1 laid the cell phone down. The video showed several inmates walking around the inmate while he was speaking to NA #1 and Resident #2 was visible sitting in the wheelchair with NA #1 and NA #2 present in the resident's room. NA #2 was observed undressing Resident #2 and taking off her shirt. It was observed that multiple inmates and a guard walked by the inmate during this time. -:53 NA #2 was observed jerking the resident's shirt out of Resident #2's hands aggressively. Residents #2's bare shoulders were observed to be showing. -2:09 NA #1 pointed the live stream video at Resident #2 and Resident #2 was visible in the wheelchair with her shirt removed and NA # 1 was trying to remove her bra from her right arm; both breasts were showing. The inmate stated, come on man, come on man. The inmate stated, I got to go, bye. NA #1 states no we're talking. The inmate replies, that s . just p . me off. NA #2 comes in the live video frame and was laughing. During this time multiple inmates were behind the inmate in an open public area. -3:02 NA #1 was holding the cell phone and pointed it to NA #2 smiling and laughing into the camera. NA #2 acknowledged again she is on a live video stream call with the inmate. -3:07 NA #2 was viewed fastening Resident #2's gown behind her back and the inmate states, y'all are crazy., y'all crazy as hell. Y'all two together is trouble. -3: The inmate stated, you just put anything on camera you need to stop that s NA #1 replied I don't give a damn. -4:29 NA #1 was observed standing on the right side of the bed and NA #2 was on the left between the resident's beds with Resident #2 sitting in the mechanical lift sling suspended. NA #1 had the phone live streaming Resident #2 and laughing. The privacy curtain was not pulled between the two beds. The roommate was not visualized at this time. -4:42 NA #1 turned the cell phone camera, and Resident #2 was suspended in the mechanical lift. Inmates were passing by behind the inmate that was watching. -5:01 Resident #2 was being transferred to her bed in the mechanical lift and there was another resident in the room in the opposite bed. The privacy curtain was not pulled while Resident #2 was being transferred. -6:01 NA #1 laid the cell phone down still showing care and rolled Resident #2 aggressively on to her left side by jerking up by the lift pad. Resident #2's face was away from the camera with her full brief exposed. The inmate stated, damn, don't roll her out of bed. NA #1 looked back at the video and laughed. NA #2 was still present in the room on the other side of the bed assisting with Resident #2. Two inmates were observed in the back in the open area. -6:08 NA #1 stated, patient confidentiality and moved the phone to the side of the bed pointing towards the end wall not viewing the resident but still live streaming while giving care to the resident. -7:17 NA #1 stated to resident, open your legs girl. NA # 1 stated more that was not discernable. -8:45 NA #1 and NA #2 exited the resident's room and walked down the facility hall and continued to talk to the inmate on the cell phone. -9:46 Video ends. A phone interview conducted with the Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations on 12/2/24 at 11:30 AM revealed he had obtained video footage of an inmate and NA #1 having a video call where NA #1 had shown the inmate view of an elderly resident in a wheelchair. The Lieutenant stated he had reported the concerns to Adult Protective Services (APS) and was concerned NA #1 had exploited Resident #2. A follow up phone interview with Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations on 12/05/24 at 9:20 AM explained the video occurred on 10/4/24 and the video call app used was Home WAV which is a video call that is recorded of both parties. The Lieutenant indicated when a video call occured the inmate had a phone receiver to hear the conversation but had a computer size screen mounted on the wall to see who they are face calling. The Lieutenanr stated other inmates were unable to hear the conversation but could visually see the video because the screen is in a non-private area with other inmates present. An interview conducted with NA #1 on 12/02/24 at 2:35 PM revealed she had worked in the facility for two years. NA #1 further revealed she had completed an in-service on resident privacy and video and telephone calls were prohibited in care areas. NA #1 stated she had never taken any pictures or videos of any resident in the facility. A phone interview conducted with Nurse Aide (NA) #2 on 12/4/24 at 6:00 PM revealed she had been employed by the facility for approximately two years. NA #2 further revealed she had been educated on residents' privacy. NA #2 stated she had never observed any staff or had taken a video or picture of a resident. NA #2 indicated if she was to observe a staff member record a resident that she would report it to the Administrator. NA #2 denied any staff videoing Resident #2 while giving care. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator on 12/02/24 at 2:45 PM revealed they both had been recently employed at the facility. The interview revealed no staff had reported concerns about staff having their phones out in care areas and taking pictures or video footage of a resident. Both indicated nursing staff had been in-service at hire, annually, and anytime on resident privacy and person phones were not allowed to be out in resident rooms. The video was shared with facility staff on 12/4/24 at 5:45 PM. Those present were the Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations, and [NAME] President of Risk and QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement). The facility staff cried. After the video was reviewed, Resident #2, NA #1, and NA #2 were identified by the DON. It was further revealed nursing staff were not allowed to have personal cell phones in care areas and it was not permitted to record any audio or image of a resident. The DON stated NA #1 failed to protect the privacy of Resident # 2 and NA #2 failed to report the exploitation and privacy of Resident #2. An interview conducted with Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) on 12/5/24 at 3:15 PM revealed the facility had notified the family of the video on 12/04/24. The RP further revealed she was upset this had happened to Resident #2 but was glad it was being investigated and hoped justice would be served to NA #1 and NA #2. An interview conducted with the Administrator on 12/9/24 at 4:00 PM revealed she had been employed by the facility for a short period of time but assisted with the initial investigation. The Administrator further revealed NA #1 and NA #2 had denied being in any video or on a telephone call with a resident present. The Administrator further revealed she expected nursing staff to not break confidentiality and protect residents' privacy. The Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations, and [NAME] President of Risk and QAPI were notified of immediate jeopardy on 12/5/24 at 12:35 PM. The Administrator was not present. The facility provided the following immediate jeopardy removal plan. The facility failed to maintain privacy for Resident # 2 while personal care was provided. NA # 1 used her personal cell phone while in the residents' room to facetime with a male inmate which allowed Resident # 2 to be observed sitting in a wheelchair, naked, with no shirt or bra on, with her breasts exposed without her consent. The observation was provided in real time through the use of a wall mounted screen in a common area of an incarceration center while other people in the prison were also observed walking past the screen. On 12/2/24 at 1:35pm, the DON suspended NA #1 pending outcome of abuse investigation and notified the Medical Director (MD) of allegation. Because the resident was unknown at this time and the presence of a witness was unknown, the facility was unable to make notifications to Resident #2's resident representative or initiate immediate suspension of NA #2. On 12/2/24 at 2:15pm, the Social Worker (SW) notified the local police department and adult protective services (APS). A police report number was obtained. On 12/2/24 at 3:30pm, the Administrator submitted the initial allegation report to North Carolina Department of Health Human Services (NCDHHS). On 12/2/24 at 4:00pm, the Administrator completed an observational round of facility residents and staff to ensure that resident's right to privacy is maintained. Observations include 1) care being provided only be authorized staff, 2) use of privacy curtains, closed doors during personal care and covering/draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 3) no cellular or other video devices used by staff in resident care areas and 4) any other violation of resident right to personal privacy not only of a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space. No additional concerns identified. On 12/2/24 and on 12/4/2024, the DON, VPCO, VPRQA, Administrator and Medical Director held an Ad Hoc meeting to discuss incident to determine root cause analysis of the facility's failure to maintain privacy for a resident while personal care was being provided. Root cause analysis determined that the facility failed to implement an effective system to ensure strict enforcement and monitoring measures to prohibit cellular phones and video recording devices in resident care areas. On 12/4/24 at 3:30pm, additional information was provided to the facility to include identification of resident (Resident #2) and addition of a witness (NA #2). In response to this new information, the DON immediately suspended NA #2, notified Resident #2 resident representative(s) and the MD and the VPRQA notified local law enforcement and APS with updated information to initial 12/2/24 reports. The VPCO assessed Resident #2 for physical injury, pain and signs or symptoms of psychosocial distress and no concerns were observed and resident was pleasantly confused at baseline. On 12/4/2024 the VPCQA, VPCO and DON attempted to obtain information regarding the location of the prison. Upon receipt of this information, the facility plans to inquire on the security of the recording and ensure that Resident #2 is protected from any additional violation of privacy by others who are unauthorized to have such information. Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring, and when the action will be complete. Effective 12/2/24, all current facility staff were in-serviced on the Resident Rights Policy, CMS guidance 483.10(h) and the Cell Phone Policy by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and licensed nurse manager. Training included examples of violation of residents' privacy to include, but not limited to 1) privacy of not only a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space, including accommodations and personal care, 2) only authorized staff directly involved in providing care and services for the resident may be present when care is provided, unless the resident consents to other individuals being present during the delivery of care, 3) during the delivery of personal care and services, staff must remove residents from public view, pull privacy curtains or close doors, and provide clothing or draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 4) photographs or recordings of a resident and/or his or her body or private space without the resident's, or designated representative's written consent, is a violation of the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 5) staff taking unauthorized photographs of a resident's room or furnishings (which may or may not include the resident), or a resident eating in the dining room, or a resident participating in an activity in the common area, 6) taking unauthorized photographs or recordings of residents in any state of dress or undress using any type of equipment (for example, cameras, smart phones, and other electronic devices), 7) keeping or distributing them through multimedia messages or on social media networks is a violation of a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 8) potential effects on residents whose privacy is not maintained to include, humiliation, dignity, respect and feelings of dehumanization, 9) strict prohibition and NO TOLERANCE to use cellular phones or any type of audio or video device in resident care areas, resident rooms, common areas such as hallways, dining rooms, courtyards, etc.,10) cell phones are allowed to be kept in staff possession in the facility on a silenced or vibrate mode to allow for emergency alerts but may only be used in breakrooms or other non-resident areas and 11) staff are responsible to intervene if witnessing any violation of the Cell Phone Policy and/or the Resident Rights Policy and immediately remove risk from resident and notify Administrator and 12) violation of the Cell Phone Policy or Resident Rights Policy will result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment and/or notification to licensing boards and law enforcement where applicable to ensure resident privacy is maintained. Effective 12/2/2024, questionnaires were also completed following in-servicing with current facility staff to validate competency of education received and to identify if additional incidences of resident privacy had been violated. No additional concerns reported. The SDC will be responsible for ensuring all staff are trained by tracking and reviewing the daily schedule and ensuring training is provided. Newly hired staff and staff not receiving education by 12/2/2024 will receive education prior to first worked shift by the SDC, DON or licensed nurse supervisor. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator, DON or designee will complete observational rounds of facility residents and staff to ensure that resident's right to privacy is maintained. Observations to include 1) care being provided only by authorized staff, 2) use of privacy curtains, closed doors during personal care and covering/draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 3) no cellular or other video devices used by staff in resident care areas and 4) any other violation of resident right to personal privacy not only of a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space. On 12/2/24, licensed nurses were educated and notified by the VPCO of their responsibility to complete observational rounds each shift for his/her unit as above. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the implementation and completion of this removal plan. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 12/05/2024 On 12/10/2024, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy was validated. Resident #2 was observed in the dining room pleasant and smiling with other residents in the table. During the tour of the facility residents were observed to have their doors closed for care and curtains were seen pulled to cover for privacy. There were no signs of staff cell phone use in the hallways and in resident care areas. The in-services by the facility included information on abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use, including notification of administration for any resident's behavior changes, and increased rounding observations of residents and staff. Staff interviews confirmed education was received for abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use. The facility provided psych evaluation follow up for Resident #2 regarding the incident. The facility provided evidence of daily Quality Assurance auditing of all residents divided on cognitively intact residents for interview and cognitively impaired residents for body audits, the auditing for the observational rounds every shift, staff abuse questionnaires, and new on-hire screening process and employee handbook review were executed. The facility showed evidence of communication with the sheriff's office that the video was encrypted and secured with only authorized person could access and view the footage. The IJ removal date if 12/05/24 was validated.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and family, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews, the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and family, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). Nurse aide (NA) # 1 and NA # 2 provided personal care to Resident # 2 while live streaming on a cell phone, the resident was naked from the waist up, the staff and the prison inmate watching the live stream spoke with profanity and vulgarity without any regard for the resident; the staff did not explain care as it was provided to the resident; the staff were physically aggressive during care; the staff allowed an inmate who was watching the live stream to view the resident and speak to the resident; the staff allowed this live streaming while other inmates were observed in the open area behind him. As Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired, the reasonable person concept was applied. A reasonable person would have been traumatized by being abused by caregivers in their home environment making them feel worthless, angry, dehumanized and powerless. Immediate jeopardy began on 10/4/24 when Resident #2 was abused. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/5/24 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at the scope and severity of D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is immediate jeopardy) to ensure education is completed and monitoring systems put into place and are effective. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and mood disturbance. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two-person for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further revealed Resident #2 had adequate hearing and vision and was able to understand others. The MDS indicated no behaviors of rejection and care. Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 04/07/23 revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficient due to Alzheimer's disease, impaired cognition, and muscle weakness. The goal was for Resident #2 to maintain its current level of function through the review date. Resident #2's care plan revised on 08/19/24 revealed the resident was resistive to care and refused to see the dentist and other medical directors at time due to dementia. The goal was for the resident to cooperate with care through the next review date. Interventions included for Resident #2 to make decisions about treatment regime and to give clear explanation of all care activities prior to an as they occur during each contact. Review of video footage provided by the Sheriff Department revealed the following events took place on 10/04/24 at 10:30 PM. The video revealed NA #1 and NA #2 located in a facility in the resident's room on live stream video through a cell phone with a prison inmate. The inmate was observed talking into a telephone receiver in an open area with several other inmates behind him. The inmate was looking at the live stream. The video was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 4:45 PM. The following was found and documented by the time mm:ss (minutes colon seconds) where mm represents minutes and ss represents seconds. -:01 Video starts with NA #1 walking down the facility hallway towards Resident #2's room. No residents were shown at this time. -:33 NA #1 entered Resident #2's room. -:45 NA #1 laid the cell phone down and shook her rear in the camera as the inmate states, that damn ass is fat. Look at that ass. That mother f . is fat. The video showed several inmates walking around the inmate while he was speaking to NA #1 and Resident #2 was visible sitting in the wheelchair with NA #1 and NA #2 present in the resident's room. NA #2 was observed undressing Resident #2 and taking off her shirt. It was observed that multiple inmates and a guard walked by the inmate during this time. Staff were not observed to be explaining their actions related to care to the resident. -:53 NA #2 was observed jerking the resident's shirt out of Resident #2's hands aggressively. Residents #2's bare shoulders were observed to be showing. NA #2 was not observed to explain care to the resident. -1:28 NA #1 picked up the cell phone and spoke to the inmate walking throughout the resident's room. -2:07 NA #2 was observed waving and smiling at the inmate through the cell phone acknowledging the inmate. -2:09 NA #1 pointed the live stream video at Resident #2 and Resident #2 was visible in the wheelchair with her shirt removed and NA # 1 was trying to remove her bra from her right arm; both breasts were showing. The inmate stated, come on man, come on man. NA #1 pointed the live stream video at NA #2, and she is observed smiling and laughing. The inmate stated, I got to go, bye. NA #1 states no we're talking. The inmate replies that s . just p . me off. NA #2 comes in the live video frame and was laughing. During this time multiple inmates were behind the inmate in the open public area. -3:02 NA #1 was holding the cell phone and pointed it to NA #2 smiling and laughing into the camera. NA #2 acknowledged again she is on a live video stream call with the inmate. -3:07 NA #2 was viewed fastening Resident #2's gown behind her back and the inmate stated, y'all are crazy., y'all crazy as hell. Y'all two together is trouble. Staff did not explain the care being provided to the resident. -3:32 NA #1 stated, this mother f . about to hit this resident in the head and proceeded to state it's not going to hurt her; she isn't going to bruise because she is black. The inmate stated, you just put anything on camera you need to stop that s NA #1 replied I don't give a damn. -4:05 NA #1 stated, Resident #2 (Name of resident) say hey to him, and put the camera in the resident's face while sitting in the lift sling starting to be lifted. Resident #2 was moving her mouth and breathing heavy. NA #1 and NA #2 did not explain to the resident they were putting her into a mechanical lift. NA #1 stated, she is trying to focus on going into the lift. She is scared as hell. The inmate stated, are yall about put her in the bed? NA #1 replied hell yeah she will be falling like a mother f . I know I am not lifting her up. While the inmate was speaking to NA #1 another inmate was observed behind him in the open area. -4:29 NA #1 was observed standing on the right side of the bed and NA #2 was on the left between the resident's beds with Resident #2 sitting in the mechanical lift sling suspended. NA #1 had the phone live streaming Resident #2 and laughing. The privacy curtain was not pulled between the two beds. A roommate was not visualized at that time. -4:42 NA #1 had the phone pointed towards her and stated, who the f . shoes she got on (NA #2's nickname.) NA #1 and NA #1 started to laugh, and NA #1 stated, this is not this ladies' shoes. NA #1 turned the cell phone camera, and Resident #2 was suspended in the mechanical lift with neither aide beside her. Inmates were passing by behind the inmate that was watching. -5:01 Resident #2 was being transferred to her bed in the mechanical lift and there was another resident in the room in the opposite bed. The privacy curtain was not pulled while Resident #2 was being transferred. -5:09 Resident #2 was still in the mechanical lift sling and NA #1 put the camera in the resident's face and stated, say hey. Resident's face was scrunched up. The inmate stated, why you looking so mean? speaking about the resident's facial expression. NA #1 stated, she is mad, but she doesn't even understand what we are saying. -5:18 NA #1 laid the phone down while she was still being shown on live video stream and the inmate stated, put that camera down a little more let me see that mother f (inaudible words). NA #1 grabbed the phone and lowered it showing off her rear. The inmate stated, that mother f NA #1 and NA #2 began to laugh. -6:01 NA #1 laid the cell phone down still showing care and rolled Resident #2 aggressively on to her left side by jerking up by the lift pad. The care was not explained to the resident. Resident #2's face was away from the camera with her full brief exposed. The inmate stated, damn, don't roll her out of bed. NA #1 looked back at the video and laughed. NA #2 was still present in the room on the other side of the bed assisting with Resident #2. Two inmates were observed in the back in the open area. -6:08 NA #1 stated, patient confidentiality and moved the phone to the side of the bed pointing towards the end wall not viewing the resident but still live streaming while giving care to the resident. -6:16 Resident #2 stated, oh, oh, while NA #1 assisted the resident and NA # 1 stated, you aren't about to fight me. -6:20 Resident #2 grabbed NA #1's left pant leg and NA #1 stepped back and then stepped forward, and the resident swatted at NA #1. NA #1 looked at the camera and laughed while continuing care. The inmate stated, what happened why did you move the phone? NA #1 stated, because she is trying to fight me. F . she is trying to fight us. I am not going to get my ass whooped by an old lady. -7:17 NA #1 stated to resident open your legs girl. NA # 1 stated more that was not discernable. -7:30 NA #1 stated good night (residents name) . After you fought like a mother f . Then stated God d NA #2 stated go to sleep (residents name). -7:40 NA #2 was observed taking off two sets of gloves and the inmate asked, why you put on two gloves? NA #1 stated this mother f be sh . like hell. NA #2 stated and pissin'. NA #1 agreed and stated, pissin' like hell. -7:54 NA #1 picked up phone and turned towards Resident #2 and showed the resident in bed with covers up to her neck and stated, good night boo. Resident #2 had facial grimacing. -7:58 NA #2 stated the way she pissed is like she can hold her piss all day. NA #1 replied and stated, yeah, she can hold her piss all day. Like a waterfall. NA #2 replied yep. -8:15 NA #1 stated, I'm fixing to clock out. NA #1 had the cell phone pointed towards her with NA #2 following her. NA #2 stated it's not even 11 o'clock where the f . are you going? NA #1 replied, I'm ready to go I'm tired as a mother f .,. The NAs walked towards the resident's door to leave. -8:45 NA #1 and NA #2 exited the resident's room and walked down the facility hall and continued to talk to the inmate on the cell phone. -9:46 Video ends. A phone interview conducted with the Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations on 12/2/24 at 11:30 AM revealed he had obtained video footage of an inmate and NA #1 having a video call where NA #1 had shown the inmate view of an elderly resident in a wheelchair and completed a phone call where NA #1 discussed abusing residents and not leaving bruises on them. The Lieutenant stated he had reported the concerns to Adult Protective Services (APS) and was concerned NA #1 had exploited Resident #2. A follow up phone interview with Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations on 12/05/24 at 9:20 AM explained the video occurred on 10/4/24 and the video call app used was Home WAV which is a video call that is recorded of both parties. The Lieutenant indicated when a video call occured the inmate had a phone receiver to hear the conversation but had a computer size screen mounted on the wall to see who they are face calling. The Lieutenanr stated other inmates were unable to hear the conversation but could visually see the video because the screen is in a non-private area with other inmates present. An interview conducted with NA #1 on 12/02/24 at 2:35 PM revealed she had worked in the facility for two years. NA #1 further revealed she had completed an in-service on abuse and neglect and was educated to report abuse or neglect to the administrator. NA #1stated she had never taken any pictures or videos of any resident in the facility. A phone interview conducted with Nurse Aide (NA) #2 on 12/4/24 at 6:00 PM revealed she had been employed by the facility for approximately two years. NA #2 further revealed she had been educated on abuse upon hire, yearly, and randomly. NA #2 stated she had never observed any staff or had taken a video or picture of a resident. NA #2 indicated if she was to observe a staff member record a resident that she would report it to the Administrator. NA #2 denied any staff videoing Resident #2 while giving care. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator on 12/02/24 at 2:45 PM revealed they both had been recently employed at the facility. The interview revealed no staff had reported concerns about staff having their phones out in care areas and taking pictures or video footage of a resident. Both indicated nursing staff had been in-service at hire, annually, and anytime on resident privacy and person phones were not allowed to be out in resident rooms. The video was shared with facility staff on 12/4/24 at 5:45 PM. Those present were the Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations, and [NAME] President of Risk and QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement). Facility staff were crying. After the video was reviewed, Resident #2, NA #1, and NA #2 were identified by the DON. It was further revealed NA #1 and NA #2 had been in-serviced on abuse and neglect and reporting upon hire, annually, and during any abuse investigations. It was indicated Resident #2 was not alert and oriented and could be combative and resistive to care. The DON revealed she expected staff to walk away and get help if the resident becomes frustrated or combative. It was further revealed nursing staff were not allowed to have personal cell phones in care areas and it was not permitted to record any audio or image of a resident. The DON stated NA #1 failed to protect the privacy of Resident # 2 and NA #2 failed to report the exploitation and privacy of Resident #2. An interview conducted with Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) on 12/5/24 at 3:15 PM revealed the facility had notified the family of the video on 12/04/24. The RP further revealed she was upset this had happened to Resident #2 but was glad it was being investigated and hoped justice would be served to NA #1 and NA #2. An interview conducted with the Administrator on 12/9/24 at 4:00 PM revealed she had been employed by the facility for a short period of time but assisted with the initial investigation. The Administrator further revealed NA #1 and NA #2 had denied being in any video or on a telephone call with a resident present. The Administrator further revealed she expected nursing staff to prevent abuse and neglect and report. The Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations, and [NAME] President of Risk and QAPI were notified of immediate jeopardy on 12/5/24 at 12:35 PM. The Administrator was not present. The facility provided the following immediate jeopardy removal plan. Identify those recipients who have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance. The facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental and sexual abuse (Resident #2). On 10/4/24 Resident #2 was shown in compromised positions during an audiovisual phone call from Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 with a male individual who was witnessing the audiovisual through the use of a wall mounted screen in a common area of an incarceration center while other people in the prison were observed walking past the screen. During the audiovisual surveillance, NA #1 was observed to show Resident #2 to the male through her phone camera, the resident sitting in a wheelchair, naked, with no shirt or bra on, with her breasts exposed. There were two NAs witnessed in the video, NA #1 and NA #2. The NA's did not explain to the resident before each step of care was provided; NA # 1 shoved the resident to turn on her side aggressively; NA # 1 and the inmate talked inappropriately, using vulgar language including f**k and sh*t, about the resident and to the resident while NA # 1 and the inmate carried on their own private, foul mouthed (including discussion of NA #1's buttocks), conversation in the presence of the resident. On 12/2/2024 at 1:30pm, the Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) and [NAME] President of Risk and Quality Assurance (VPRQA) were notified by a surveyor during a recertification and complaint survey that a complaint was received from the community alleging an inappropriate photo or video of an unknown elderly female, partially unclothed and a female identified as NA #1was witnessed. On 12/2/24 at 1:35pm, the DON suspended NA #1 pending outcome of abuse investigation and notified the Medical Director (MD) of allegation. Because the resident was unknown at this time and the presence of a witness was unknown, the facility was unable to make notifications to Resident #2's resident representative or initiate immediate suspension of NA #2. On 12/2/24 at 2:15pm, the Social Worker (SW) notified the local police department and adult protective services (APS). A police report number was obtained. On 12/2/24 at 3:30pm, the Administrator submitted the initial allegation report to North Carolina Department of Health Human Services (NCDHHS). On 12/2/24 at 4:00pm, the Administrator completed an observational round of facility residents and staff to ensure that resident rights to privacy and freedom from abuse is maintained. Observations included 1) care being provided only by authorized staff, 2) use of privacy curtains, closed doors during personal care and covering/draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 3) no cellular or other video devices used by staff in resident care areas and 4) any other violation of resident right to personal privacy not only of a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space and 5) observations t ensure residents have no physical signs or behaviors indicative of potential abuse. No additional concerns identified. On 12/2/2024 and on 12/4/2024, the DON, VPCO, VPRQA, Administrator and Medical Director held an Ad Hoc meeting to discuss incident to determine root cause analysis of the facility's failure protect a resident's right to be free from abuse. Root cause analysis determined that the facility failed to implement an effective system to ensure strict enforcement and monitoring measures to prohibit cellular phones and video recording devices in resident care areas. Effective 12/2/2024, licensed nurses completed resident abuse questionnaires with cognitively intact residents and body audits with cognitively impaired residents to identify any additional concerns of resident abuse. No additional concerns reported or observed. On 12/4/24 at 4:00pm, the DON, VPCO and VPRQA were notified of additional information and observed video surveillance provided by the survey team identifying Resident #2 as a resident of the facility and of mental and sexual abuse by NA #1 in the presence of NA #2. The DON immediately suspended NA #2 pending investigation. The VPRQA notified police and provided additional information and left a message with APS. The DON notified Resident #2's resident representative (RP) and MD was provided updated information received. On 12/4/2024 at 6:00pm, the VPCO assessed Resident #2 for physical injury, pain and signs or symptoms of psychosocial distress and no concerns were observed and was pleasantly confused at baseline. Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring, and when the action will be complete. Effective 12/2/2024, all current facility staff were in-serviced on the Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, Resident Rights Policy and Cell Phone Policy by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and licensed nurse manager. Abuse training topics included preventing, reporting and identifying what constitutes abuse and NO TOLERANCE for failure to comply and ensure resident protection. Identification examples included; physical, mental, sexual, verbal, neglect, exploitation and signs of mental or emotional abuse such as, sudden unexplained changes in behavior, changes in eating habits, withdrawal from care, fear of certain persons or expressions of guilt or shame and staff obligation of reporting abuse immediately to the Administrator and prevention of abuse by the immediate intervention of removing the harm or potential for harm from the resident by removing the perpetrator or threat. Education of proper resident care includes examples such as ensuring residents are not harmed physically or handled roughly during care but are provided with care that is gentle, kind, dignified and that residents are free from offensive comments, profanities or other form of verbal abuse. To protect resident's right to privacy, the facility is adopting a NO TOLERANCE Cell Phone Policy focusing on the strict prohibition of cellular phones and any type of electronic recording device use in resident care areas, especially while providing personal care. Training included examples of violation of residents' privacy to include, but not limited to 1) privacy of not only a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space, including accommodations and personal care, 2) only authorized staff directly involved in providing care and services for the resident may be present when care is provided, unless the resident consents to other individuals being present during the delivery of care, 3) during the delivery of personal care and services, staff must remove residents from public view, pull privacy curtains or close doors, and provide clothing or draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 4) photographs or recordings of a resident and/or his or her body or private space without the resident's, or designated representative's written consent, is a violation of the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 5) staff taking unauthorized photographs of a resident's room or furnishings (which may or may not include the resident), or a resident eating in the dining room, or a resident participating in an activity in the common area, 6) taking unauthorized photographs or recordings of residents in any state of dress or undress using any type of equipment (for example, cameras, smart phones, and other electronic devices), 7) keeping or distributing them through multimedia messages or on social media networks is a violation of a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 8) potential effects on residents whose privacy is not maintained to include, humiliation, dignity, respect and feelings of dehumanization, 9) strict prohibition and NO TOLERANCE to use cellular phones or any type of audio or video device in resident care areas, resident rooms, common areas such as hallways, dining rooms, courtyards, etc., 10) cell phones are allowed to be kept in staff possession in the facility on a silenced or vibrate mode to allow for emergency alerts but may only be used in breakrooms or other non-resident areas and 11) staff are responsible to intervene if witnessing any violation of the Cell Phone Policy and/or the Resident Rights Policy and immediately remove risk from resident and notify Administrator and 12) violation of the Cell Phone Policy or Resident Rights Policy will result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment and/or notification to licensing boards and law enforcement where applicable to ensure resident privacy is maintained and resident's remain free from abuse. Effective 12/2/2024, abuse questionnaires were also completed with current facility staff to validate competency of education received and to identify any additional allegations or incidence of resident abuse. No additional concerns reported. The SDC will be responsible for ensuring all staff are trained by tracking and reviewing the daily schedule and ensuring training is provided. Newly hired staff and staff not receiving education by 12/2/2024 will receive education prior to first worked shift by the SDC, DON or licensed nurse supervisor. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator, DON or designee will complete ongoing daily observational rounds of facility residents and staff to ensure that residents are free from abuse and resident rights to privacy is maintained, including strict prohibition of staff cellular phone use or any type of audio or video device use in resident care areas. Observations to include 1) care being provided only be authorized staff, 2) use of privacy curtains, closed doors during personal care and covering/draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 3) no cellular or other video devices used by staff in resident care areas, 4) any other violation of resident right to personal privacy not only of a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space, 5) observations of any form of physical, sexual or emotional abuse which include but are not limited to; a. ensuring residents are not harmed physically or handled roughly during care but are provided with care that is gentle, kind, dignified; b. residents are free from offensive comments, profanities or other form of verbal abuse and c. observations to ensure residents are not exhibiting signs of mental anguish such as tearfulness, withdrawal, fear, guarding, aggressiveness and other unusual changes in resident behaviors. On 2/2/24, licensed nurses were educated and notified by the VPCO of their responsibility to complete observational rounds each shift for his/her unit and observe resident and staff interactions as above. Effective 12/4/24, the facilities new hire screening process has been updated to include additional measures to better determine the candidate's probability of providing excellent resident care to further ensure residents are free from abuse. Updates include improved interview process, a minimum of two professional references, screening of social media content for inappropriate content and improved screening of background checks. Human Resources (HR) and/or the Administrator, DON or SDC are responsible for the interview process, screening reference checks and screening social media platforms. With the guidance of our legal counsel, a template including a set of questions will be used during the interview process which include the categories of background, interpersonal skills and qualifications and a template for reference checks will be used. Screening of social media platforms will be used via internet search to provide information related to a candidate's personal character. The Human Resource (HR) Director will process and review criminal background checks and forward to the Administrator or DON for approval if a criminal record is identified. The Administrator or DON will consider all screening results to make a final determination. However, the facility will NOT extend employment to any candidate with convictions or pending convictions involving elder abuse, neglect or exploitation. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the implementation and completion of this removal plan. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 12/5/2024 On 12/10/2024, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy was validated. Resident #2 was observed in the dining room pleasant and smiling with other residents in the table. During the tour of the facility residents were observed to have their doors closed for care and curtains were seen pulled to cover for privacy. There were no signs of staff cell phone use in the hallways and in resident care areas. The in-services by the facility included information on abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use, including notification of administration for any resident's behavior changes, and increased rounding observations of residents and staff. Staff interviews confirmed education was received for abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use. The facility provided evidence of daily Quality Assurance auditing of all residents divided on cognitively intact residents for interview and cognitively impaired residents for body audits, the auditing for the observational rounds every shift, staff abuse questionnaires, and new on-hire screening process and employee handbook review were executed. The immediate jeopardy removal date of 12/5/24 was validated.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and responsible party, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement abuse policies in the area of ident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and responsible party, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement abuse policies in the area of identification, protection and reporting for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). While Resident # 2 was being abused, neither of the two nurse aides (NA #1 and NA #2) in the room identified the abuse, intervened to stop the abuse, and neither of the two nurse aides reported the abuse immediately to licensed staff or administrative staff. Immediate jeopardy began on 10/4/24 when Resident #2 was abused without staff identification, intervention or reporting. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/5/24 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at the scope and severity of D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is immediate jeopardy) to ensure education is completed and monitoring systems put into place and are effective. The findings included: A review of the facility policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with a revised date of 10/22/24, read in part it is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. As read in section 1: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, reads 1a.) Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. This tag is cross referred to F600 Based on observation, record review, and family, Lieutenant of Criminal Investigations and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2). Nurse aide (NA) # 1 and NA # 2 provided personal care to Resident # 2 while live streaming on a cell phone, the resident was naked from the waist up, the staff and the prison inmate watching the live stream spoke with profanity and vulgarity without any regard for the resident; the staff did not explain care as it was provided to the resident; the staff were physically aggressive during care; the staff allowed an inmate who was watching the live stream to view the resident and speak to the resident; the staff allowed this live streaming while other inmates were observed in the open area behind him. As Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired, the reasonable person concept was applied. A reasonable person would have been traumatized by being abused by caregivers in their home environment making them feel worthless, angry, dehumanized and powerless. Immediate jeopardy began on 10/4/24 when Resident #2 was abused. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/5/24 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at the scope and severity of D (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is immediate jeopardy) to ensure education is completed and monitoring systems put into place and are effective. The Director of Nursing (DON), [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO), and [NAME] President of Risk and QAPI (VPRQA) were notified of immediate jeopardy on 12/5/24 at 1:45 PM. The Administrator was not present. The facility provided the following credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. Identify those recipients who have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance: The facility failed to follow their abuse policy in the areas of identification, prevention, and reporting when NA #2 witnessed NA #1 conduct an audiovisual phone call where NA #1 showed Resident #2 in compromised positions during a recorded call NA #1 was having with a male individual who was witnessing Resident #2 through the use of a wall mounted screen in a common area of an incarceration center. During the audiovisual conversation NA #1 was observed to show Resident #2 to the male individual through her phone camera, the resident sitting in a wheelchair, naked, with no shirt or bra on, with her breasts exposed. NA #2 failed to intervene to stop the audiovisual device and protect the resident from ongoing mental abuse, and did not immediately get licensed staff or administrative staff to intervene and stop it, nor did she notify administration, or a supervisor. On 12/4/24 at 4:00pm, the DON, VPCO and VPRQA were first made aware of the presence of NA #2 during the incident on 10/4/2024. The DON immediately suspended NA #2 pending investigation. The VPRQA notified police and provided additional information and left a message with APS. The DON notified Resident #2's resident representative (RR) and MD was provided updated information received. On 12/4/2024 at 6:00pm, the VPCO assessed Resident #2 for physical injury, pain and signs or symptoms of psychosocial distress and no concerns were observed and was pleasantly confused at baseline. On 12/4/2024 the VPCQA, VPCO and DON attempted to obtain information regarding the location of the prison. Upon receipt of this information, the facility plans to inquire on the security of the recording and ensure that Resident #2 is protected from any additional violation of privacy by others who are unauthorized to have such information. On 12/4/2024, the DON, VPCO, VPRQA, Administrator and Medical Director held an Ad Hoc meeting to discuss incident to determine root cause analysis of the facility's failure to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse when NA #2 did not identify, prevent or report the incident on 10/4/2024. Root cause analysis determined that the facility failed to 1) implement an effective system to ensure staff knowledge of the Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy to include detailed examples of how to identify, prevent and report abuse and validation of staff understanding and 2) the facility failed to enforce a strict NO TOLERATION for cell phone use and video recording device use in resident care areas per the Cell Phone Policy. Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or reoccurring, and when the action will be complete. Effective 12/2/2024, all current facility staff were in-serviced on the Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, Resident Rights Policy and Cell Phone Policy by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and licensed nurse manager. Abuse training topics included preventing, reporting and identifying what constitutes abuse and NO TOLERANCE for failure to comply and ensure resident protection. Identification examples included; physical, mental, sexual, verbal, neglect, exploitation and signs of mental or emotional abuse such as, sudden unexplained changes in behavior, changes in eating habits, withdrawal from care, fear of certain persons or expressions of guilt or shame and staff obligation of reporting abuse immediately to the Administrator and prevention of abuse by the immediate intervention of removing the harm or potential for harm from the resident by removing the perpetrator or threat. Education of proper resident care includes examples such as ensuring residents are not harmed physically or handled roughly during care but are provided with care that is gentle, kind, dignified and that residents are free from offensive comments, profanities or other form of verbal abuse. To protect resident's right to privacy, the facility is adopting a NO TOLERANCE Cell Phone Policy focusing on the strict prohibition of cellular phones and any type of electronic recording device use in resident care areas, especially while providing personal care. Training included examples of violation of residents' privacy to include, but not limited to 1) privacy of not only a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space, including accommodations and personal care, 2) only authorized staff directly involved in providing care and services for the resident may be present when care is provided, unless the resident consents to other individuals being present during the delivery of care, 3) during the delivery of personal care and services, staff must remove residents from public view, pull privacy curtains or close doors, and provide clothing or draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 4) photographs or recordings of a resident and/or his or her body or private space without the resident's, or designated representative's written consent, is a violation of the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 5) staff taking unauthorized photographs of a resident's room or furnishings (which may or may not include the resident), or a resident eating in the dining room, or a resident participating in an activity in the common area, 6) taking unauthorized photographs or recordings of residents in any state of dress or undress using any type of equipment (for example, cameras, smart phones, and other electronic devices), 7) keeping or distributing them through multimedia messages or on social media networks is a violation of a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality, 8) potential effects on residents whose privacy is not maintained to include, humiliation, dignity, respect and feelings of dehumanization, 9) strict prohibition and NO TOLERANCE to use cellular phones or any type of audio or video device in resident care areas, resident rooms, common areas such as hallways, dining rooms, courtyards, etc., 10) cell phones are allowed to be kept in staff possession in the facility on a silenced or vibrate mode to allow for emergency alerts but may only be used in breakrooms or other non-resident areas and 11) staff are responsible to intervene if witnessing any violation of the Cell Phone Policy and/or the Resident Rights Policy and immediately remove risk from resident and notify Administrator and 12) violation of the Cell Phone Policy or Resident Rights Policy will result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment and/or notification to licensing boards and law enforcement where applicable to ensure resident privacy is maintained and resident's remain free from abuse. Effective 12/2/24, abuse questionnaires were also completed with current facility staff to validate competency of education received and to identify any additional allegations or incidence of resident abuse. No additional concerns reported. The SDC will be responsible for ensuring all staff are trained by tracking and reviewing the daily schedule and ensuring training is provided. Newly hired staff and staff not receiving education by 12/2/24 will receive education prior to first worked shift by the SDC, DON or licensed nurse supervisor. Effective 12/2/24, abuse questionnaires were also completed with current facility staff to validate competency of education received and to identify any additional allegations or incidence of resident abuse. No additional concerns reported. The SDC will be responsible for ensuring all staff are trained by tracking and reviewing the daily schedule and ensuring training is provided. Newly hired staff and staff not receiving education by 12/2/24 will receive education prior to first worked shift by the SDC, DON or licensed nurse supervisor. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator, DON or designee will complete ongoing daily observational rounds of facility residents and staff to ensure that residents are free from abuse and resident rights to privacy is maintained, including strict prohibition of staff cellular phone use or any type of audio or video device use in resident care areas. Observations to include 1) care being provided only be authorized staff, 2) use of privacy curtains, closed doors during personal care and covering/draping to prevent exposure of body parts, 3) no cellular or other video devices used by staff in resident care areas, 4) any other violation of resident right to personal privacy not only of a residents' own physical body, but of his or her personal space, 5) observations of any form of physical, sexual or emotional abuse which include but are not limited to; a. ensuring residents are not harmed physically or handled roughly during care but are provided with care that is gentle, kind, dignified; b. residents are free from offensive comments, profanities or other form of verbal abuse and c. observations to ensure residents are not exhibiting signs of mental anguish such as tearfulness, withdrawal, fear, guarding, aggressiveness and other unusual changes in resident behaviors. On 2/2/24, licensed nurses were educated and notified by the VPCO of their responsibility to complete observational rounds each shift for his/her unit and observe resident and staff interactions as above. Effective 12/4/24, the facilities new hire screening process has been updated to include additional measures to better determine the candidate's probability of providing excellent resident care to further ensure residents are free from abuse. Updates include improved interview process, a minimum of two professional references, screening of social media content for inappropriate content and improved screening of background checks. Human Resources (HR) and/or the Administrator, DON or SDC are responsible for the interview process, screening reference checks and screening social media platforms. With the guidance of our legal counsel, a template including a set of questions will be used during the interview process which include the categories of background, interpersonal skills and qualifications and a template for reference checks will be used. Screening of social media platforms will be used via internet search to provide information related to a candidate's personal character. The Human Resource (HR) Director will process and review criminal background checks and forward to the Administrator or DON for approval if a criminal record is identified. The Administrator or DON will consider all screening results to make a final determination. However, the facility will NOT extend employment to any candidate with convictions or pending convictions involving elder abuse, neglect or exploitation. Effective 12/2/2024, the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the implementation and completion of this removal plan. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 12/5/2024 On 12/10/2024, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy was validated. Resident #2 was observed in the dining room pleasant and smiling with other residents in the table. During the tour of the facility residents were observed to have their doors closed for care and curtains were seen pulled to cover for privacy. There were no signs of staff cell phone use in the hallways and in resident care areas. The in-services by the facility included information on abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use, including notification of administration for any resident's behavior changes, and increased rounding observations of residents and staff. Staff interviews confirmed education was received for abuse, privacy, resident rights, and cellphone use. The facility provided evidence of an Ad Hoc meeting discussion of the root cause analysis of the facility failure to implement effective systems of their abuse policy. The facility provided evidence of daily Quality Assurance auditing of all residents divided on cognitively intact residents for interview and cognitively impaired residents for body audits, the auditing for the observational rounds every shift, staff abuse questionnaires, and new on-hire screening process and employee handbook reviewed. The facility's IJ removal date of 12/05/24 was validated.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misapprop...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of controlled medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of a resident's property (Resident #6). The resident received her pain medication as scheduled. Findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy, last updated on 10/22/24, was reviewed and it included misappropriation in part was the protection of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic pain. Resident #6 had an order for oxycodone 10 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours for chronic pain dated 2/13/24. A pharmacy packing slip dated 3/25/24 documented dispense date of 3/25/24 of 4 cards of oxycodone 10 mg and each card had 10 tablets for a total of 40 tablets. A review of the medication monitoring/control record received by Nurse #4 documented between 3/25/24 through 3/27/24 there were 10 oxycodone 10 mg administered every 6 hours as ordered, signed with correct descending amount. The remaining amount was 0 for card number one. There were three remaining oxycodone 10 mg cards with 10 tablets each with a medication monitoring/control record. The daily nursing schedule dated 3/27/24 had Nurse #2 scheduled on B-Hall assigned to Resident #6 on day shift, and she was responsible for this hall's medication cart. The shift change narcotic count verification for total number of narcotic sheets for all residents on Hall B medication cart ending date 3/26/24 was documented by Nurse #3 total number 32 sheets. Four sheets were added for a total of 36. A 6 was written with a 4 for the column sheets added and the total column was written as 38. The 8 appeared to be written on with another number that was not legible. The comments column documented Resident #6 had 4 oxycodone cards on 3/26/24. All rows were filled on this sheet. A new shift change narcotic count verification sheet was started dated 3/27/24 3 pm shift oncoming nurse signature Nurse #2 and off going nurse was blank. Number 36 was in the narcotic sheets column. A new row on the narcotic count verification sheet was started dated 3/27/24 11 pm shift oncoming nurse and off going nurse columns were both signed with a signature of Nurse #3's name. There was no number in the narcotic sheets column. The handwriting of the signatures on this sheet appeared to be the same for both names, all 3 signatures. The Director of Nursing (DON) provided a folder with Resident #6's narcotic misappropriation investigation dated 3/27/24 documentation: On 3/27/24 the 2nd shift nurse reported that Resident #6 was missing 1 of 4 cards of oxycodone 10 mg that were delivered on 3/25/24. The DON completed a review of the shift verification count sheet and noted that the sheet count number had been altered. Further investigation revealed 1 medication monitoring control record and 1 card of 10 oxycodone 10 mg tablets were missing. The pharmacy and police were notified. All other facility medication carts of narcotic counts were audited, and no other concerns were noted. Nurse #2 was suspended pending investigation. The pharmacy confirmed that 4 cards of oxycodone 10 mg were delivered on 3/25/24. The pharmacy packing slip indicated that 4 cards of oxycodone 10 milligrams with 10 tablets on each card were delivered. Nurse #2 was contacted by phone and refused to provide a statement related to oxycodone. Nurse #2 was reported to the North Carolina Board of Nursing on 4/3/24. Education was initiated with licensed nurses regarding the narcotic count and correcting errors in the medication record properly. Corrective actions: The pharmacy was contacted by the DON on 3/28/24 and a replacement refill card of oxycodone 10 mg 10 tablets was obtained at the expense of the facility. The police were contacted, and they informed the facility they were unable to reach Nurse #1 by phone or the address on file by the agency. Nurse #2 will not be allowed to work in the facility. On 4/8/24 a urine specimen was obtained from Nurse #3. The test was negative for all drugs including opiate. Nurse #2 was left messages on 3/27/24 and 3/28/24 twice. A return call was received from her on 3/29/24 at 10:40 am. She stated that she wanted her pay approved. Nurse #2 was asked to come to the facility and provide a statement. A statement was not provided. All residents that had narcotic orders were reviewed for accuracy of administration and count. All medication control records were reviewed and medication audited, and no other misappropriation of medication was identified. Audits were completed for weeks 4/3/24 through 5/1/24 weekly for 4 weeks or longer if concerns were identified. Goal: Residents' controlled drugs will be properly handled and the facility will have correct records/documentation on the narcotic count sheets. The audits were completed, and counts were correct. An in-service roster of nurses signed for education about the policy controlled substance administration and accountability revision November 2017 had 32 staff signatures. Additional information to correct mistakes appropriately was included. On 12/5/24 at 2:54 pm an interview was conducted with Nurse #2. She stated on 3/25/27 four oxycodone cards with 10 tabs each were received for Resident #6 and Nurse #3 and #4 observed, documented, and counted that this was added to the shift change narcotic count verification sheet and there was a medication monitoring control record for each oxycodone card. Both nurses signed for the received oxycodone. The new cards were added to the shift change narcotic count verification sheet, and we used the last row of that sheet with a date of 3/26/24. A new shift change narcotic count verification sheet was started and signed by Nurse #3 and #4. Nurse #2 was on day shift 3/27/24 responsible for the narcotics and counted with Nurse #3 at shift change 3:00 pm. The Medication monitoring control record that was being used was accurate. There were the correct number of shift change narcotic count verification sheets numbered. Nurse #3 stated she went to administer an oxycodone at the beginning of her evening shift and checked the paperwork. She noticed that the new shift change narcotic count verification sheet was not the sheet she and Nurse #4 had started and signed on 3/26/24. The signatures were not theirs and both appeared to be signed by the same person. A check of the previous shift change narcotic count verification sheet ending date 3/26/24 that Nurse #3 and #4 had completed to the last row of the sheet had the number of narcotic sheets added and total number of narcotic sheets on the cart were changed. The numbers were written over and were not the correct numbers, the numbers written by Nurse #3 the evening before 3/26/24. Nurse #3 noticed that one of the oxycodone cards was missing. There should have been 3 cards remaining and now there were only 2. Nurse #2 had left immediately after report at shift change and narcotic count and was unable to be reached by telephone. On 12/5/24 at 2:40 pm an interview was conducted with the [NAME] President of Quality. She stated the Administrator was not present and the DON employed March 2024 was no longer working at this facility. She also stated she would look for additional nursing education roster sheets, QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) minutes, and Drug Enforcement Administration notification. On 12/5/24 at 4:20 pm the [NAME] President of Quality provided a QAPI minute meeting dated 3/27/24 with the topic drug diversion and the team roster. Nurse # 4 was interviewed on 12/10/24 at 12:25 pm. Nurse #4 stated 4 cards of oxycodone 10 mg were received for Resident #6 on 3/25/24. Nurse #3 and Nurse #4 counted, documented, and signed for the receipt of the Oxycodone 3/25/24 at 7:00 am. One card of the Oxycodone 10 mg was used and counted down to 0 on 3/27/24. The count was correct when Nurse #4 left after night shift 3/27/24 7:00 am and counted with Nurse #2. Nurse #4 started a new shift change narcotic count sheet with Nurse #3 and signed and dated 3/26/24. Nurse #4 counted with Nurse #2 at the beginning of her day shift 3/27/24 at 7:00 am and the narcotic count was correct. The sheet Nurse #4 started was present and there were 3 full cards of oxycodone 10 mg remaining. On 3/27/24 at 3:00 pm the shift change narcotic count sheet that Nurse #3 and Nurse #4 started was missing. Another sheet was started by an agency nurse (Nurse #2). Nurse #4's name was not on this new sheet. Nurse #3 and Nurse #2's name were on the new sheet and the handwriting looked the same. On 12/10/14 the [NAME] President of Quality provided the remaining nurse education roster and a statement that the Drug Enforcement Administration was notified under the facility's previous name and identification number and the document was not obtainable. The facility provided the following corrective action plan with a completion date of 4/7/24: F602 1. Corrective action for resident(s) affected by the alleged deficient practice: Resident #6 was affected by misappropriation of her schedule oxycodone pain medication. The resident received her medication as scheduled. The medication was replaced by the facility. 2. Corrective action for residents with the potential to be affected by the alleged deficient practice: All residents with a narcotic order for pain had potential to be affected. The Director of Nursing completed an audit of all medication carts with narcotics to verify that all narcotics and narcotic sheets were accounted for with no other concerns identified. The audit was completed on 3/27/24. 3. Measures/Systemic changes to prevent recurrence of alleged deficient practice: On 3/27/24 through 4/7/24 training on the following topics for all licensed nurses and medication aids regarding misappropriation of personal property that focused on shift-to-shift count, verifying medications on hand, misappropriation, and documentation. The Director of Nursing and/or designee would continue to maintain and monitor controlled medication records to ensure consistency and accountability. Education was completed by 4/7/24 for all nursing staff, including agency staff. Monitoring of the medication carts began on 3/27/24 with the initial audit after the misappropriation. The monitoring continued weekly for 4 weeks. The QA members were notified on 3/27/24. 4. Monitoring procedure to ensure that the plan of correction is effective, and that specific deficiency cited remains corrected and/or in compliance with regulatory requirements. The Director of Nursing audited all medication carts weekly for 4 weeks. There were no adverse findings. The misappropriation was reported to the QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) Committee) on 3/27/24. Compliance Date: 4/8/24 Validation of the corrective action plan was completed on 12/11/24. Review of documentation/staff roster of education that was completed with 33 nurses and medication aides who had responsibility to administer narcotic medication and had access to controlled substances covered drug loss or theft, administration, and shift-to-shift drug count was completed. The education took place between 3/27/24 through 4/7/24. On 12/5/24 interviews were conducted individually with Nurse #1 and #3 and on 12/10/24 with Nurse #4. The Nurses stated they participated in education for narcotic misappropriation, storage, reporting, count, and documentation. The compliance date of 4/8/24 was validated.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews with Resident #65 and staff, the facility failed to provide nail care and h...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews with Resident #65 and staff, the facility failed to provide nail care and hand hygiene for a dependent resident (Resident #65). This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 sampled dependent residents. Findings included: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of limited range of motion. Resident #65's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented her cognition was intact. The resident required assistance from one staff member for bathing and personal grooming. The care plan for Resident #65 dated 9/13/24 included the resident required assistance with all activities of daily living. The intervention was nail care to be provided with showers or bathing. On 12/2/24 at 11:40 am an observation and interview was completed of Resident #65. The Resident was sitting in her bed in a hospital gown. The Resident's nails were noted to be uneven, long, and had black matter underneath the nails, especially the right hand. The resident stated she usually had a bed bath and had no offer from the Nursing Assistant (NA) to provide nail care. The resident stated she would like nail care, and she had not refused care. The resident also stated she had asked an NA to cut her nails, but the NA had not returned to provide care a couple of days earlier. On 12/5/24 at 1:50 pm an observation and interview was completed with Resident #65. The Resident's nails remained long, uneven but had less black matter. The right hand had two nails that remained with black matter underneath. The Resident stated she was taken to the dining room by the Activity Director yesterday for an activity. The Resident was informed she was going to receive a manicure including nail polish. The Resident stated she had not gotten her nails done and was taken back to her room and had not known why. The resident stated she had a bed bath yesterday and the NA assigned had not provided nail care and she did not know why. The Resident had not asked for nail care. The Resident stated she required assistance with all bathing and nail care. She could not cut her own nails and had no access to wash her hands/nails without staff assistance. An interview was conducted with NA #4 on 12/5/24 at 1:55 pm. NA #4 stated he was assigned on day shift to Resident #65 on 12/4/24 and 12/5/24. NA #4 stated he provided a bed bath on 12/4/24 but had not provided nail care. NA #4 had not provided nail care because his assignment was heavy. NA #4 stated he ran out of time. NA #4 had not offered or provided nail care today (12/5/24) but would provide care now. NA #4 stated he was aware and had observed the resident place her hand inside her brief to scratch and had not provided hand hygiene before meals. The resident had itchy skin all over her body. NA #4 further stated he had not informed the nurse about the scratching. On 12/5/24 at 1:45 pm an interview was conducted with NA #3. NA #3 stated she was assigned to Resident #65 on 12/5/24, day shift. The NA stated she provided morning care for the resident and her bath was yesterday. The NA stated on rounds this morning the resident was observed to have her hands in her brief scratching what appeared to be her private area. The resident told the NA that she was scratching her leg. The NA stated she had not offered to clean the resident's hands after the scratching and before lunch. The NA had not known why the resident's nails were long, uneven, and dirty underneath. The NA stated she would provide nail care following the interview. On 12/5/24 at 1:55 pm an interview was conducted with the Activity Assistant. She stated there was an activity yesterday for manicures. She stated the activity ran out of time and the dining room was needed for lunch. Resident #65 was not able to have her manicure due to a lack of time. The Activity Director was also an NA and would clean/cut a resident's nails if needed. The Activity Assistant stated she was going to have another manicure activity on Saturday but could not cut the resident's nails, she was not an NA. She further stated Resident #65 would be added to the list for manicure this Saturday (12/7/24). On 12/4/24 at 3:39 pm an interview was conducted with Nurse #1. She stated the NAs were responsible to provide the residents with nail care during the shower or bed bath unless refused and the nurse would need to be notified. She stated the NAs had not notified her Resident #65 had refused care, including nail care. Nurse #1 was not aware that the resident's nails required care and would let the NA scheduled know. An interview was conducted with Nurse #1 on 12/5/24 at 2:05 pm. She was not aware that the resident's nails were not cared for yesterday with the bath (12/4/24). The resident sometimes preferred a bath over a shower but had not refused care. She was not aware that the resident was observed by NA #3 and NA #4 putting her hand into her brief and scratching. She could not remember which NA provided the bed bath yesterday. On 12/5/24 at 3:45 pm an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON was not aware Resident #65 had not received nail care and was scratching her skin, including inside her undergarment. The DON would want staff to provide hand hygiene before meals if a resident was scratching inside an undergarment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a quarterly smoking assessments for 2 of 3 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a quarterly smoking assessments for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #31 and Resident #72). The findings included: 1a. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension, muscle weakness, dementia, and blindness in one eye. Review of Resident #31's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded for smoking. Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADL). Resident #31 was coded for moderate visual impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #31's mobility device was a wheelchair use. Review of Resident #31's care plan revised on 12/4/24 revealed the resident was a smoker and was supervised because he was once non-compliant with smoking policy and witnessed smoking in his room. The goal was for Resident #31s smoking related injuries to be minimized with intervention through next review. Interventions included smoking assessment to be completed per facility policy. Review of Resident #31's smoking assessments revealed the only smoking assessment completed since the last recertification dated 07/08/23 was on 09/17/24. The smoking assessment dated [DATE] concluded Resident #3 was a supervised smoker because he was unable to demonstrate and understand the smoking policy, times, and place to smoke. 1b. Resident #72 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension and unsteadiness of feet. Review of Resident #72's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not coded for smoking. Review of Resident #72's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired and required supervision for most ADL. The MDS further revealed Resident #72 had adequate vision. Resident #72 was coded for wheelchair and walking cane use. Resident #72's had a smoking assessment completed on 12/02/23 and the next smoking assessment was not conducted until 06/02/24 which assessed Resident #72 as an independent smoker. Review of Resident #72's care plan revised on 07/24/24 revealed the resident was an independent smoker. The goal was for Resident #72 to not suffer injury from unsafe smoking practices. The interview conducted with Nurse #6 on 12/05/24 at 12:55 PM revealed Resident #31 was a supervised smoker and Resident #72 was an unsupervised smoker. Nurse #6 further revealed nurses assigned to residents were expected to complete smoking assessment quarterly. The Nurse indicated the computer system notified staff when a residents' assessment needs to be completed. Nurse #6 revealed she does not know why they were not completed on time but should have been. Interview conducted with Unit Manager (UM) #1 on 12/05/24 at 1:20 PM revealed smoking assessments were expected to be completed quarterly. UM #1 indicated nurses were notified by the computer what assessments were pending and needed to be completed during their shift, and they were expected to do so. UM #1 indicated she was not aware Resident #31 and Resident #72's smoking assessments had not been completed quarterly. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on 12/05/24 at 3:10 PM revealed she had not been employed with the facility for long but expected quarterly smoking assessments to be completed. The DON further revealed she was not aware Resident #31 and Resident #72 went several months without a smoking assessment being conducted.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on manufacturer's recommendations, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to date three opened bottles of artificial tears stored for use in 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on manufacturer's recommendations, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to date three opened bottles of artificial tears stored for use in 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (the B-hall medication cart). Findings included: A review of the manufacturer's recommendations for artificial tears stated after the bottle was opened it should have been discarded after 28 days. On 12/3/2024 at 11:00 am an observation of the B-hall medication cart with Nurse #5 revealed 3 bottles of artificial tears were found without an open date. Nurse #5 stated the bottles were in the boxes and the date was on the box on the previous evening. Nurse #5 stated either the bottle or the box should be dated when the bottle is opened. On 12/9/2024 at 11:06 am the Director of Nursing was interviewed by phone, and she sated the bottles of artificial tears that were opened in the B-hall medication cart should have been dated when they were opened. The Administrator was present during the interview and stated either the box or the bottle of the artificial tears should have been dated when the bottle was opened.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident #27's Representative and Resident #28 in wri...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident #27's Representative and Resident #28 in writing, of transfers to the hospital for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #27 and Resident #28). The findings included: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], 8/4/24, and 11/9/24. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #27 to be severely cognitively impaired. a. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed a progress note dated 2/28/24 that documented Resident #27's transfer to the hospital for difficulty swallowing. A progress note dated 3/7/24 documented Resident #27's return from the hospital with a diagnosis of elevated sodium level. Review of the medical record revealed no transfer notification. b. A progress note dated 8/3/24 documented Resident #27's transfer to the hospital after a fall and complaints of head pain. A progress note dated 8/4/24 documented Resident #27's readmission to the facility after hospitalization for fall. Review of the medical record revealed no transfer notification. c. A progress note dated 11/6/24 documented Resident #27 was experiencing nausea and vomiting, and he was sent to the hospital for evaluation. A progress note dated 11/9/24 documented Resident #27's return from the hospital. The hospital discharge note dated 11/9/24 documented Resident #27 was admitted to the hospital for intractable nausea and vomiting. Review of the medical record revealed no transfer notification. The Social Worker (SW) was interviewed on 12/5/24 at 3:25 PM. The SW reported the previous administrator had told her she needed to provide a written notice of transfer for residents sent to the hospital, but she had not started to provide the written notice of transfer to residents or their representative. The SW reported she had not provided a written notice of transfer for any resident. The Administrator was interviewed by phone on 12/9/24 at 11:10 AM. The Administrator reported she was not aware the SW was not providing a written notice of transfer for residents, or their representatives and she expected all residents or their representatives to receive a written notice of transfer. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility 8/27/24. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #28 was cognitively intact. A progress note dated 12/3/24 documented Resident #28 was sent to the hospital for cellulitis (infection of the soft tissue) of the leg, elevated white blood cells, and elevated kidney function. Resident #28 remained hospitalized during the survey. Review of the medical record revealed no transfer notification to Resident #28. The Social Worker (SW) was interviewed on 12/5/24 at 3:25 PM. The SW reported the previous administrator had told her she needed to provide a written notice of transfer for residents sent to the hospital, but she had not started to provide the written notice of transfer to residents or their representative. The SW reported she had not provided a written notice of transfer for any resident. The Administrator was interviewed by phone on 12/9/24 at 11:10 AM. The Administrator reported she was not aware the SW was not providing a written notice of transfer for residents, or their representatives and she expected all residents or their representatives to receive a written notice of transfer.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free of misappropriation of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free of misappropriation of narcotic pain medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 11/1/2020 indicated the facility would prohibit and prevent misappropriation of resident property. Resident #1 was admitted for a short stay for rehabilitation to the facility on 7/14/2023 after a hospitalization for encephalopathy and weakness. A review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed he did not have an order for hydromorphone. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and he did not require pain medication. Attempted to call Resident #1 during the survey and there was no answer at the number the facility had for him, and the phone did not receive messages. Nurse #13 was interviewed by phone on 9/13/2023 at 3:32 pm and she stated she had gone into Resident #1's room shortly after he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and found a medication bottle with 58 hydromorphone, a narcotic pain medication, sitting on his bedside table and had explained to him it would need to be locked in the medication cart and he agreed. Nurse #13 stated she put the bottle in the medication cart and counted the medications with another nurse and put a medication count form in the narcotic book to ensure the medication was counted each shift. Nurse #13 stated she notified the Director of Nursing (DON) the medication was in the locked narcotic drawer on the medication cart. Nurse #13 stated she worked on 8/1/2023 on the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift and counted the hydromorphone with Nurse #14 when she arrived for the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm shift on 8/1/2023. Nurse #13 stated when she arrived for her shift on 8/2/2023 on the 7:00 am to 3:00 pm shift the bottle of hydromorphone was missing from the medication cart. Nurse #13 stated there were fifty-eight pills in the medication bottle when she left the faciity on 8/1/2023 at 3:00 pm. On 9/13/2023 at 3:46 pm Nurse #14 stated she worked the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm shift on 8/1/2023 and an agency nurse, Nurse #15, was the nurse that came in on the 11:00 pm to 7:00 am shift, and he had counted the narcotic medications with her when she was leaving at 11:00 pm and there were 58 hydromorphone tablets in Resident #1's medication bottle. Nurse #4 was interviewed on 9/13/2023 at 4:11 pm and she stated she was the supervisor on the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm shift on 8/1/2023. Nurse #4 stated Nurse #15 became erratic and was cussing and taking his clothes off in the courtyard of the facility during the 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm shift on 8/1/2023 and she stated she questioned him about his behavior he said he was sleep deprived and she sent him home. Attempted to contact Nurse #15 during the survey and there was no answer on his phone and the phone did not accept messages. On 8/2/2023 at 12:15 pm Nurse #13's Nurse's Progress Note stated Resident #1 was discharged home with his family without pain or discomfort. The note further stated Resident #1 was informed his personal medication was missing and he was not happy. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 9/13/2023 at 4:35 pm and she stated Resident #1 brought in a bottle of medication that was a narcotic pain medication, hydromorphone, when he was admitted to the facility. She stated the day he was discharged the hydromorphone were no longer in the medication cart but they were the evening before he was discharged . The DON stated the facility does not drug test nurses unless there is a reasonable suspicion of them being under the influence. The DON stated Nurse #15 was sent home due to erratic behavior and when the narcotic medication was discovered missing, he would not come back to the facility for a drug test. The DON stated the facility had reported the missing narcotic medication to the police department and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). The Director of Nursing stated she did notify the staffing agency of the incident and told them she did not want Nurse #15 to return to the facility. The Administrator stated on 9/14/2023 at 3:36 pm he was not the administrator when the drug Resident #1's home medications were misplaced 8/1/2023.
Jul 2023 8 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, resident, family, nurse practitioner (NP), physician (MD), and staff interviews, the facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, resident, family, nurse practitioner (NP), physician (MD), and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the MD of a resident who experienced pain following a fall for 1 of 3 residents investigated for notification of changes (Resident #94). Resident #94 sustained a fall on 6/2/2023 and reported the fall and right hip pain to Physical Therapist (PT) #1 on 6/3/2023. PT #1 reported the fall and the hip pain to a nurse. Resident #94 reported the fall and right hip pain when she was assessed by NP#2 on 6/5/2023. NP#2 ordered an x-ray of the right hip, which revealed a fractured femur (the long bone in the leg). Resident #94 was sent to the hospital on 6/6/2023 at 12:30 AM and had a partial hip replacement surgery on 6/7/2023. Immediately Jeopardy began on 6/3/2023 when Resident #94 reported the fall and right hip pain to PT #1 and the MD was not notified. Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/26/2023when the facility implemented a credible allegation of Immediate Jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at a scope and severity level of D (not actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy) for the facility to complete staff training and to ensure monitoring systems put in place are effective. The findings included: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia and frequent falls. The admission nursing assessment recorded by Nurse #6 dated 6/2/2023 documented that Resident #94 was alert and oriented to person and situation. An interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/20/2023 at 3:30 PM. Resident #94 reported the evening of 6/2/2023 she used her call light to get assistance to use the bathroom, but no staff came to help her, so she got up to go to the bathroom on her own. Resident #94 reported she fell on the floor outside of the bathroom and hit her right hip. Resident #94 explained that she started yelling for help immediately, and her roommate (Resident #50) yelled for help, too. Resident #94 said that 2 nurse aides (NAs) came to her room, picked her up and put her back in bed. Resident #94 recalled her leg hurt terribly and she told the NAs her leg was hurting. Resident #94 explained the therapist (PT #1) came in the next day to see her and she told PT #1 she did not think she could stand up because she fell the night before. PT #1 told Resident #94 she would talk to the nurse. Resident #94 reported her right leg hurt so bad all the time and every time staff moved her in bed, she told them that it hurt. Resident #94 said the NP #2 came in to see her on Monday morning 6/5/2023 and she told the NP that she had fallen and was having right hip pain. A follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/21/2023 at 1:58 PM. Resident #94 recounted the fall on 6/2/2023 and added that she thought she fell after dinner but could not specifically recall the time. Resident #94 recounted that she screamed and screamed (for help) and 2 ladies (NAs) came and got me into bed, I screamed in pain the entire time. Resident #94 reported she had called her family member on 6/2/2023 to report the fall. The family member of Resident #94 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 4:19 PM. The family member reported that Resident #94 called him at 7:10 PM on 6/2/2023 to tell him that she had fallen, and she was having pain in her hip. The family member explained that Resident #94 told him 2 staff members had picked her up off the floor, and he didn't think he needed to call the facility to report the fall. The family member reported he came to visit Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and talked to Nurse #1 and reported that Resident #94 had fallen and was having pain. The family member explained that he visited again on Sunday, 6/4/2023 and asked the nurse on duty about getting Resident #94 a walker, and he also mentioned the fall and pain to Nurse #8. When asked about the nurse's response, the family member said the nurse did not say anything about the reported fall. The family member reported he had called the admission's staff member and left her a voice mail reporting the fall on Monday, 6/5/2023. A physical therapy evaluation conducted by PT #1 and dated 6/3/2023 documented that Resident #94 reported right hip pain from a fall 6/2/2023. PT #1 documented that Resident #94 required moderate assistance to stand with right-sided leaning noted. The note documented the physical therapist notified the nurse (unnamed) and was told nursing would order an x-ray. PT #1 was interviewed by phone on 7/21/2023 at 2:49 PM. PT#1 reported she evaluated Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and she attempted to stand Resident #94 at the bedside, but Resident #94 was unable to stand. The PT explained that Resident #94 and her roommate, Resident #50, told her that Resident #94 fell the night before. Resident #94 reported right hip pain to her with touch. Resident #94 was unable to stand during the evaluation without moderate assistance and was leaning to the right. PT #1 indicated she went to the nursing station and looked for a nurse and reported the fall and the pain that Resident #94 was experiencing. PT #1 reported an unknown nurse and told her she would get an order for an x-ray for Resident #94. PT#1 was not certain the time of day she evaluated Resident #94. PT #1 was unable to provide the name of the nurse or the time she reported to the nurse. Nurse #1, an agency nurse, was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 on the day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). Multiple attempts to contact Nurse #1 for an interview were unsuccessful including phone calls with voice messages and text messages. NA #1 was interviewed on 7/20/2023 at 11:57 AM. NA #1 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3 and 6/4/2023 for the day shift. NA #1 reported Resident #94 had pain during the weekend when they moved her in bed. NA #1 reported she had reported the pain to Nurse #1 on 6/3/2023. NA #1 reported Resident #94 did not get out of bed on day shift for 6/3/2023 or 6/4/2023 and she required incontinence care in bed because of the right hip pain. An interview was conducted with NA #2 on 7/20/2023 at 2:28 PM. NA #2 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 for the afternoon shift. The NA explained that Resident #94 complained of pain in her hip, but she did not report to any nurse because she had observed PT #1 reporting the pain a nurse. NA #2 explained she did not remember the nurse that received the report from PT #1, but she had seen the two of them talking. Resident #94 was unable to get out of bed during the afternoon shift on 6/3/2023 because of the pain she experienced with moving. NA #2 reported she did not notice bruising on Resident #94's right hip. There was no evidence in the medical record that Nurse #1 or any other staff notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/3/2023. An interview was conducted with NA #4 by phone on 7/25/2023 at 11:10 AM. NA #4 reported she provided Resident #94 with incontinence care on 6/5/2023 during the afternoon shift and Resident #94 was in intense pain all shift. NA #4 reported she attempted to provide incontinence care by herself, and this caused Resident #94 to scream and scream in pain. NA #4 explained that she had to get another NA to assist her with care. NA #4 reported she told Nurse #2 that Resident #94 was in pain. Nurse #2 was interviewed on 7/19/2023 at 4:05 PM and she reported that she was assigned to Resident #94 during the afternoon shift on 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, and 6/5/2023 had not expressed she was in pain at all to her when Nurse #2 conducted the pain assessments on those dates. A follow up interview with Nurse #2 on 7/25/2023 at 1:44 PM revealed no one reported Resident #94 was experiencing pain on 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023 during her afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported that no one reported Resident #94 had a fall or was experiencing hip pain. Nurse #2 indicated that when she performed the pain assessment for Resident #94 on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023, the resident denied pain. Nurse #2 reported she did not notice swelling or bruising of Resident #94's right leg during any of her shifts. Nurse #2 reported she was aware of the fall when she arrived for work on 6/5/2023 for the afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported she waited for the x-ray results to call to the physician but was told the results were not sent until after the end of her shift. Nurse #2 denied conducting any assessments on Resident #94, except for the daily shift pain assessment. Nurse #8 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 1:53 PM and she reported she remembered Resident #94's family member requesting a walker during her shift (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM) on 6/4/2023 but denied the family member reporting Resident #94 was experiencing pain. There was no evidence in the medical record that Nurse #2, Nurse #8, or any other staff notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/4/2023. NP#1 was interviewed on 7/20/2023 at 12:14 PM. NP #1 reported that a review of the on-call logs revealed no calls came from the facility to report a fall or pain for Resident #94 on 6/2, 6/3, or 6/4/2023. NA #3 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 4:49 PM. NA #3 explained she was working on day shift on 6/2/2023 when Resident #94 was admitted to the facility, and she had assisted her to the bathroom. NA #3 indicated Resident #94 was able to transfer to the wheelchair and to the toilet by standing and pivoting to sit and the resident had no issues with the transfers or any episodes of incontinence on 6/2/2023. NA #3 reported she returned to work on 6/5/2023 and was assigned to Resident #94 on the day shift, and when she attempted to provide care, Resident #94 yelled in pain my leg, my leg! NA #3 reported on Monday 6/5/2023 for the day shift Resident #94 was in bed with an incontinence brief on and required incontinence care. NA #3 reported she went to get the nurse, and when they returned to Resident #94's room, NP #2 was at the bedside. NA #3 explained Resident #94 was unable to move in bed without yelling out in pain. NA #3 reported she went to get Nurse #6 and when she returned to Resident #94's room, NP #2 was at the bedside. NA #3 described that Resident #94 experienced pain all day on 6/5/2023 and she had to get another NA to assist her with incontinence care for Resident #94 because of her pain level. NA #3 reported Resident #94 said her pain was in her right hip and it was very sharp and severe with any kind of movement and turning for incontinence care was unbearable painful. NA #3 reported on 6/2/2023 Resident #94 was able to get up to the bathroom, but she stayed in bed all day 6/5/2023 and received incontinence care in the bed. A progress note written by NP #2 dated 6/5/2023 documented Resident #94 reported to her that on 6/2/2023 she attempted to go to the bathroom and had a fall with pain in her right hip since (the fall). The NP documented Resident #94 had increased pain/discomfort with touch, no bruising was noted, and the hip appeared to be swollen. The NP documented Resident #94 had pain to the right hip/thigh that Resident #94 rated as 4 and described as aching. The note documented Resident #94 had as needed (acetaminophen) at this time, and staff were to continue to monitor Resident #94 until an x-ray result were received. NP #2 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 2:45 PM. NP #2 reported she was performing the admission assessment on Resident #94 on 6/5/2023 when Resident #94 reported the hip pain and fall. NP #2 explained she ordered an x-ray of Resident #94's hip and when the x-ray was read and it was determined Resident #94 had a fracture, she was sent to the hospital for evaluation. NP #2 reported she had not received notification of the fall or reports of pain prior to 6/5/2023. NP #2 reported she would have ordered an x-ray on 6/3/2023 of Resident #94's hip if she had been notified of the fall with pain. A hip x-ray dated 6/5/2023 and read at 9:39 PM read a right subcapital fracture with moderate displacement (acute right hip fracture). A nursing note dated 6/6/2023 at 12:31 AM documented the results of the hip x-ray were received by the facility at 11:45 PM on 6/5/2023. The on-call NP was paged, and the nurse received an order to send Resident #94 to the hospital for evaluation for the right hip fracture. The note documented that Resident #94 left the facility by ambulance at 12:30 AM. The emergency department (ED) provider note dated 6/6/2023 at 1:28 AM documented Resident #94 presented with right hip pain that was found to be fractured on an x-ray obtained outpatient earlier that day. Resident #94 reported she fell three days ago and has had right hip pain ever since. The note documented the x-ray obtained by the facility showed a right hip fracture. On exam the ED physician noted tenderness to the right hip without deformity. Repeat x-rays obtained confirmed a closed subcapital right femoral neck fracture. There was no pain rating, or documentation of medications administered for pain. Orthopedic surgery was consulted and at 3:05 AM recommended for Resident #94 to be admitted and make her NPO (nothing by mouth) status. An orthopedic trauma consult note dated 6/6/2023 at 10:40 AM documented: Patient (Resident #94) reported on Friday 6/2/2023 she was attempting to get up to the bathroom and fell, landing on her right hip. She reported immediate pain in the right hip and being unable to get up after the fall. The history and physical noted: Right lower extremity: skin intact without (redness). Leg length short in comparison to contralateral leg (left leg) and hip held in external rotation (leg was rotated to the right). Endorses (agreed) hip pain with heel strike (touching heel to the floor during mobility). Details in the assessment and plan included the right femoral neck fracture was discussed with Resident #94 and the recommendation was to proceed with the hip hemiarthroplasty, to which she agreed. This plan was also discussed with a family member who agreed and stated Resident #94 was competent to sign her own consents. An orthopedic trauma operative (surgical) report dated 6/7/2023 documented Resident #94 had a right partial hip replacement performed on that date for a right hip fracture. An interview was conducted with the MD on 7/21/2023 at 11:54 AM. The MD reported that his medical group has an on-call triage line where a NP was available 24 hours a day to answer medical questions and provide orders. The MD reported that the facility had not contacted the on-call triage for anything related to Resident #94 on 6/2, 6/3, or 6/4/2023. The MD reported that delaying treatment for a fractured large bone could have resulted in many complications for Resident #94. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 3:21 PM. The DON explained that she had thought Resident #94 had not reported the fall to anyone until 6/5/2023 when NP #2 assessed her. The DON reported she was not aware of the physical therapy assessment conducted on 6/3/2023 and that PT #1 reported to Nurse #1 that Resident #94 had a fall and was experiencing pain. The DON explained staff should have immediately contacted the on-call NP and reported the fall and pain. The DON reported she was not certain why this had not happened on 6/3/2023. The Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 7/21/2023 at 6:42 PM. o Identify those recipients who have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance The facility failed to notify the physician and/or the resident representative after Resident #94 reported to the Physical Therapist on 6/3/23 that she had fallen in her room on 6/2/23. On 6/3/23, the physical therapy evaluation revealed that Resident #94 reported to the physical therapist that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room and had not reported the incident to the facility staff. The physical therapist also reported that the resident complained of right hip pain, and this was reported to the Nurse #1 on the hall who reported that she would follow up and obtain an order for an x-ray. On 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing spoke to Nurse #1, and she denied any knowledge of Resident #94 reporting that she had fallen or that the physical therapist or any other staff member reporting to her that Resident #94 had fallen. In addition, Nurse #1 was asked if Resident #94 requested pain medication or had signs or symptoms of pain and Nurse #1 reported no. On, 7/20/23, the Therapy Director spoke to the physical therapist that was working on 6/3/23 and she reported that Resident #94 had reported to her that she had fallen on 6/2/23 while attempting to go to the bathroom. The physical therapist reported that the roommate also reported that the resident had fallen on the previous day (6/2/23). On 6/5/23, after the Nurse Practitioner reported that Resident #94 reported a fall on 6/2/23, the Director of Nursing completed a follow up interview and Resident #94 reported that she had fallen while attempting to go to the bathroom and had gotten herself up off the floor and had not reported this to the staff. On 6/5/23, Unit Manager #1 and the Admissions Director spoke to Resident #94's family member who reported that on 6/2/23, Resident #94 had reported to him that she had fallen on the way to the bathroom and that she was having a lot of pain. The family member reported that he reported that Resident #94 was having pain to the charge nurse. On 6/5/23, during the Nurse Practitioner initial assessment, Resident #94 reported that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room while attempting to go to the bathroom and was having right hip pain. On 7/17/23, the facility investigation by the Director of Nursing revealed that the Nurse Practitioner was informed of Resident #94's fall on 6/2/23 during her initial assessment on 6/5/23 by the resident. In addition, further review of the medical record revealed that there was no fall nursing assessment documentation or physician/physician extender notification documentation by the licensed nurse of the 6/2/23 fall until 6/5/2023. The Director of Nursing completed the interviews on 7/21/23. The interviews revealed that the licensed nurses and the certified nursing assistants that worked on 6/2/23, 6/3/23, and 6/4/23 reported that Resident #94 did not report to them that she had fallen on 6/2/23. The licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, and certified medication aide interviews by the Director of Nursing of staff that who worked on 6/2/23, 6/3/23, and 6/4/23 per the nursing assignment sheets revealed that Resident #94 did not report the fall to the assigned licensed nurse, certified nursing assistant or certified medication aide. On 7/17/23, Nurse #3 (Weekend Supervisor) interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that Resident #94 did not express pain concerns and she did not observe signs or symptoms of excruciating pain on 6/3/23 and 6/4/23. Nurse # 3 also reported that Resident #94 as well as the other nursing staff to include the physical therapist who worked on 6/3/23 and 6/4/23, did not report that Resident #94 has fallen on 6/2/23. Nurse #3 reported that Resident #94's family member did not report to her that the resident was having pain and that the resident had fallen on 6/2/23. All current residents are also at risk as a result of this deficient practice. Starting 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing/the Unit Managers and designee will complete an audit of the medical records to include review of progress notes, outside provider notes, incident reports, medication administration records, physician orders, and nursing shift reports of all the current residents for the last 60 days to ensure the physician/ physician extenders and resident representatives have been notified of any resident falls or changes in condition and identified concerns have been address by 7/25/23. Starting 7/21/23 the Director of Nursing / designee will complete interviews of the alert current residents to ensure resident concerns to include incident and accidents, pain management, medication/ treatments and other resident care concerns have been identified and reported to the physician/ physician extenders in the last 60 days by 7/25/23. Starting 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing/ designee will complete interviews of the facility staff to include licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, certified medication aides, dietary, housekeeping/laundry, agency, new hire and prn staff to ensure all resident changes in condition or any reported concerns in the last 60 days have been reported to the DON, Unit Manager and/or the Nursing supervisor by 7/25/23. o Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or recurring, and when the action will be complete Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator/ designee will complete education by 7/25/23 of the facility staff to include licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, certified medication aides, dietary, therapy department, housekeeping/laundry, agency, new hire and prn staff related to ensuring resident changes in condition to include incident and accidents, pain management changes, medication/treatment concern, resident care concerns and any resident/families reported concerns have been reported to the licensed nurse and to the physician and/or DON, Unit Managers and nursing supervisor. Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator/ designee will complete education with the licensed nurses to include agency, new hire, and prn licensed nurses related to immediate notification and documentation of resident changes in condition to include incident and accidents, pain management changes, medication/treatment concern, resident care concerns and any resident/ families reported concerns to the physician/ physician extenders and resident representatives and document in the medical record by 7/25/23. After hours the licensed nurse will notify the on-call provider and document in the medical record. Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator was made aware by the Director of Nursing that she will be responsible for verifying that the education has been completed by the required staff members by using the facility personal roster and the nursing, dietary, therapy and housekeeping/laundry staffing schedules to include new hires, agency and prn staff and ongoing education by 7/25/23. No staff will be allowed to work until they have received this education. The SDC/ designee which includes the DON, Unit Managers, and Nursing supervisors will be responsible for providing all of the education. On 7/25/23, The Director of Nursing educated the therapy manager to ensure that all therapists to include occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech therapist, weekend therapist, new hire, and prn therapist report resident observed and reported falls to the therapy manager and the Director of Nursing immediately. Starting 7/25/23, the therapy manager will educate the therapists to include occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech therapist, weekend therapist, new hire, and prn therapist related to ensuring resident observed and reported falls are immediately reported to the therapy manager and the Director of Nursing. Therapy staff to include prn and new hire staff will not be allowed to until they receive this education. Effective 7/21/2023 the Administrator will be responsible for ensuring implementation of this immediate jeopardy removal for this alleged non-compliance. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 7/26/2023 On 7/27/2023, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy removal was validated by the following: The facility's documentation to support the Credible Allegation for F580 was reviewed. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) evaluated the named resident after she was notified the resident complained of pain due to a fall on 6/5/2023 and a pain assessment was completed. The Nurse Practitioner assessed the named resident on 6/5/2023 and sent her to the hospital for evaluation due to right hip pain due to a fall the previous Friday, 6/2/2023. The facility completed chart reviews for all residents and interviews were conducted with all cognitively intact residents and family members of residents that were not able to be interviewed. An in-service education which included the facility's policy for staff to notify the supervisor, provider, and responsible party of any falls. The education also included the nurse who was responsible for the resident would complete a post fall review with all resident falls. The facility provided the education all staff (nursing, housekeeping, therapy, dietary, and all agency staff) receive when they are oriented to the facility. Staff were interviewed to ensure their understanding of the education. The facility completed the assessment of the named resident, review and monitoring of all resident's charts and interviews with residents and family members of residents, and education of all staff by 7/25/2023. The facility's date of the immediate jeopardy removal plan of 7/26/2023 was validated on 7/27/2023.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, and resident, family member, Physical Therapist (PT) #1, Nurse Practitioner #2, Director of Rehab Servi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, and resident, family member, Physical Therapist (PT) #1, Nurse Practitioner #2, Director of Rehab Services, Physician (MD), and staff interviews, the facility neglected to protect a resident from the right to be free from deprivation of goods and services related to pain management and initiating medical care and treatment after a fall on 6/2/2023 for 1 of 4 residents investigated for abuse/neglect (Resident #94). Nurse Practitioner (NP) #2 completed Resident #94's admission assessment on 6/5/2023 and Resident #94 reported the fall on 6/2/2023 and pain in her right hip since the fall. An x-ray of the right hip revealed a right femoral neck fracture (type of hip fracture of the thigh bone). Resident #94 was sent to the hospital on 6/6/2023 and had a partial hip replacement surgery on 6/7/2023. Immediately Jeopardy began on 6/3/2023 when Resident #94 reported right hip pain after a fall and was not assessed by nursing staff to determine what medical care and services were needed. Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/26/2023 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of Immediate Jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at a scope and severity level of D (not actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy) for the facility to complete staff training and to ensure monitoring systems put in place are effective. The findings included: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia and frequent falls. The admission nursing assessment recorded by Nurse #6 dated 6/2/2023 at 2:03 PM documented that Resident #94 was alert and oriented to person and situation. Resident #94 was always continent of bowels and bladder and required a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #94 was oriented to her room and demonstrated correct use of the call light. A review of the admission medication orders dated 6/2/2023 did not include orders for pain medication. An interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/20/2023 at 3:30 PM. Resident #94 reported the evening of 6/2/2023 she used her call light to get assistance to use the bathroom, but no staff came to help her, so she got up to go to the bathroom on her own. Resident #94 reported she fell on the floor outside of the bathroom and hit her right hip. Resident #94 explained that she started yelling for help immediately, and her roommate (Resident #50) yelled for help, too. Resident #94 said that 2 nurse aides (NAs) came to her room, picked her up and put her back in bed. Resident #94 recalled her leg hurt terribly and she told the NAs her leg was hurting. Resident #94 was unable to identify the NAs who put her back in bed. Resident #94 explained the therapist (PT #1) came in the next day to see her and she told PT #1 she did not think she could stand up because she fell the night before. PT #1 told Resident #94 she would talk to the nurse. Resident #94 reported her right leg hurt so bad all the time and every time staff moved her in bed, she told them that it hurt. Resident #94 denied that a nurse assessed her after the fall and reported she had not received pain medication. Resident #94 said the NP #2 came in to see her on Monday morning 6/5/2023 and she told the NP that she had fallen and was having right hip pain. A follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/21/2023 at 1:58 PM. Resident #94 recounted the fall on 6/2/2023 and added that she thought she fell after dinner but could not specifically recall the time. Resident #94 explained that she couldn't recall if the lights were on in the bathroom. Resident #94 reported she was wearing slippers on her feet, and she fell against the wall opposite to the bathroom door and hit her right hip. Resident #94 recounted that she screamed and screamed (for help) and 2 ladies (NAs) came and got me into bed, I screamed in pain the entire time. Resident #94 reported I screamed every time I was touched or moved after the fall. I never got pain medication. Resident #94 reported she had called her family member on 6/2/2023 to report the fall. Resident #94 said her pain was 10 out of 10 all the time, they did not do anything for it. Resident #94 explained she had an x-ray that showed her right hip was fractured and she was sent to the hospital. Resident #94 reported she cried about the right leg pain every time someone came into her room and that it was horrible pain. The family member of Resident #94 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 4:19 PM. The family member reported that Resident #94 called him at 7:10 PM on 6/2/2023 to tell him that she had fallen, and she was having pain in her hip. The family member explained that Resident #94 told him 2 staff members had picked her up off the floor, and he didn't think he needed to call the facility to report the fall. The family member reported he came to visit Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and talked to Nurse #1 and reported that Resident #94 had fallen and was having pain. The family member reported that the nurse got acetaminophen (an over-the-counter pain reliever) and administered the medication to Resident #94. The family member explained that he visited again on Sunday, 6/4/2023 and asked the nurse on duty about getting Resident #94 a walker, and he also mentioned the fall and pain to Nurse #8. When asked about the nurse's response, the family member said the nurse did not say anything about the reported fall. The family member reported he had called the admission's staff member and left her a voice mail reporting the fall on Monday, 6/5/2023. The family member explained that an x-ray wasn't ordered until Monday 6/5/2023 after NP #2 examined Resident #94. A pain assessment was ordered on 6/2/2023 to be conducted 3 times per day. A review of the medication orders for Resident #94 revealed no scheduled or as needed pain medications were prescribed for her 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023. The medication administration record for June 2023 was reviewed. No administration of acetaminophen was documented for Resident #94 on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023. No nursing assessments related to pain after a fall were conducted on 6/2/2023. NA #3 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 4:49 PM. NA #3 explained she was working on day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM) on 6/2/2023 when Resident #94 was admitted to the facility, and she had assisted her to the bathroom. NA #3 indicated Resident #94 was able to transfer to the wheelchair and to the toilet by standing and pivoting to sit and the resident had no issues with the transfers or any episodes of incontinence on 6/2/2023. The pain assessment for the afternoon shift on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023 was recorded by Nurse #2 and she documented a pain level of 0. (0-10 with 10 being the most intense pain). An interview was conducted on 7/21/2023 at 12:04 PM with NA #7 and she reported she provided care to Resident #94 on 6/2/2023 for the afternoon shift. NA #7 reported Resident #94 experienced urinary incontinence, but she did not report pain and she did not report a fall during her shift. When asked if she had assisted Resident #94 off the floor after a fall, NA #7 reported that no, she had not picked Resident #94 up off the floor after a fall. Nurse #2 was interviewed on 7/19/2023 at 4:05 PM and she reported that she was assigned to Resident #94 during the afternoon shift on 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, and 6/5/2023 had not expressed she was in pain at all to her when Nurse #2 conducted the pain assessments on those dates. A follow up interview with Nurse #2 on 7/25/2023 at 1:44 PM revealed no one reported Resident #94 was experiencing pain on 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023 during her afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported that no one reported Resident #94 had a fall or was experiencing hip pain. Nurse #2 indicated that when she performed the pain assessment for Resident #94 on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023, the resident denied pain. Nurse #2 reported she did not notice swelling or bruising of Resident #94's right leg during any of her shifts. Nurse #2 reported she was aware of the fall when she arrived for work on 6/5/2023 for the afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported she waited for the x-ray results to call to the physician but was told the results were not sent until after the end of her shift. Nurse #2 denied conducting any assessments on Resident #94, except for the daily shift pain assessment. Night shift (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM) 6/2/2023 pain assessment was recorded as 0 by Nurse #9. An interview was conducted with Nurse #9 by phone on 7/21/2023 at 11:33 AM. Nurse #9 explained that she did not frequently work Resident #94's hallway (C), but she was assigned to that hallway on 6/2/2023. Nurse #9 indicated Resident #94 did not report pain when she performed the pain assessment or at any other time during the shift, and Nurse #9 stated, No, if a resident reported pain, I would have written a note or addressed it in the pain assessment. There was no evidence in the medical record that any nurse notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment of Resident #94 or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/2/2023. Day shift on 6/3/2023 pain assessment recorded by Nurse #1 documented a pain level of 0'. Nurse #1, an agency nurse, was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 on the day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). Multiple attempts to contact Nurse #1 for an interview were unsuccessful including phone calls with voice messages and text messages. NA #1 was interviewed on 7/20/2023 at 11:57 AM. NA #1 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 for the day shift. NA #1 reported Resident #94 had pain during the weekend when they moved her in bed. NA #1 reported she had reported the pain to Nurse #1 on 6/3/2023. NA #1 reported Resident #94 did not get out of bed on day shift for 6/3/2023 or 6/4/2023 and she required incontinence care in bed because of the right hip pain. NA #6 was interviewed on 7/19/2023 at 1:05 PM. NA #6 reported that he was not assigned to Resident #94, but had provided care to her roommate, Resident #50 for day shift on 6/3/2023. NA #6 reported that he found out Resident #94 fell on 6/5/2023. NA #6 was interviewed again on 7/20/2023 at 12:01 PM and he reported he worked day and evening shift on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 and he had not picked up Resident #94 from the floor on 6/2/2023 and if Resident #94 had reported pain, he would have reported the pain. The weekend supervisor Nurse #3 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 1:39 PM. Nurse #3 reported she worked 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM and no staff reported that Resident #94 was experiencing pain. A physical therapy evaluation performed by PT #1 and dated 6/3/2023 documented that Resident #94 reported right hip pain from a fall 6/2/2023. The note documented the physical therapist notified the nurse (unnamed) Resident #94 was having pain in her right hip. PT #1 was interviewed by phone on 7/21/2023 at 2:49 PM. PT#1 reported she evaluated Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and she attempted to stand Resident #94 at the bedside, but Resident #94 was unable to stand. The PT explained that Resident #94 and her roommate, Resident #50, told her that Resident #94 fell the night before. Resident #94 reported right hip pain to her with touch. Resident #94 was unable to stand during the evaluation without moderate assistance and was leaning to the right. PT #1 indicated she went to the nursing station and looked for a nurse and reported the fall and the pain that Resident #94 was experiencing. PT #1 reported an unknown nurse and told her she would get an order for an x-ray for Resident #94. PT#1 was not certain the time of day she evaluated Resident #94. PT #1 was unable to provide the name of the nurse or the time she reported to the nurse. The Director of Rehabilitation was interviewed on 7/25/2023 at 8:59 AM by phone. The Director of Rehabilitation reported that PT #1 clocked in to work on 6/3/2023 at 3:46 PM. An occupational therapy evaluation dated 6/3/2023 was reviewed. The evaluation note documented that Resident #94 had pain that interfered or limited functional activity (no location) and that nursing would address pain management. The note documented that Resident #94 reported she had a fall on 6/2/2023 and she had pain in her right leg. The Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 was interviewed on 7/25/2023 at 9:19 AM by phone. OT #1 reported she also assessed Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and Resident #94 reported she had fallen on 6/2/2023. OT #1 explained that she did not report to the nurse because Resident #94 had told her that the NA staff had helped her get up off the floor. OT #1 indicated that Resident #94 did not have pain during the evaluation, but she had not gotten Resident #94 out of bed. An interview was conducted with NA #2 on 7/20/2023 at 2:28 PM. NA #2 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 for the afternoon shift. The NA explained that Resident #94 complained of pain in her hip, but she did not report to any nurse because she had observed PT #1 reporting the pain a nurse. NA #2 explained she did not remember the nurse that received the report from PT #1, but she had seen the two of them talking. Resident #94 was unable to get out of bed during the afternoon shift on 6/3/2023 because of the pain she experienced with moving. NA #2 reported she did not notice bruising on Resident #94's right hip. There was no evidence in the medical record that any nurse notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment of Resident #94, or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/3/2023. The pain assessment for day shift on 6/4/2023 was recorded by Nurse #8 as 0. Nurse #8 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 1:53 PM and she reported she was assigned to Resident #94 during the day shift on 6/4/2023 and reported Resident #94 had not expressed she was in pain at all to her when Nurse #8 conducted the pain assessment on 6/4/2023. Nurse #8 reported she remembered Resident #94's family member requesting a walker during the day shift on 6/4/2023. Nurse #8 reported she recalled that Resident #94 was very pleasant and not in any pain. Nurse #8 reported that no staff reported a fall to her. The pain assessment for night shift on 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 were recorded by Nurse #7 as 0. Nurse #7 was interviewed by phone on 7/21/2023 at 3:15 PM. Nurse #7 reported that Resident #94 had not complained of pain when Nurse #7 conducted the pain assessment during 6/3/2023 or 6/4/2023 on the night shifts. Nurse #7 explained that Resident #94 had an order to administer acetaminophen at 6:00 AM daily and she did administer the medication to her. Nurse #7 reported the resident had not complained of pain, and she had received scheduled acetaminophen at 6:00 AM on 6/3 and 6/4/2023. NA #5 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 11:33 AM. NA #5 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/4/2023 for the night shift. NA #5 was unable to recall if Resident #94 required incontinence care during her shift and reported that Resident #94 did not complain of pain to her during the night shift. There was no evidence in the medical record that any staff notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/4/2023. The pain assessment day shift on 6/5/2023 recorded by Nurse #6 documented a pain level of 0. Nurse #6 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 12:10 PM. Nurse #6 reported she was the nurse who admitted Resident #94 on 6/2/2023 and she was also assigned to her during the day shift on 6/5/2023. Nurse #6 reported Resident #94 did not report pain to her when Nurse #6 conducted the pain assessment on 6/5/2023, and if she had reported pain, there were facility standing orders she could have activated for administering acetaminophen to Resident #94. Nurse #6 explained that because Resident #94 did not report pain to her, she did not activate the standing orders. During an interview conducted on 7/21/2023 at 4:49 PM, NA #3 reported she returned to work on 6/5/2023 and was assigned to Resident #94 on the day shift, and when she attempted to provide care, Resident #94 yelled in pain my leg, my leg! NA #3 reported on Monday 6/5/2023 for the day shift Resident #94 was in bed with an incontinence brief on and required incontinence care. NA #3 explained she went to get Nurse #6, and when they returned to Resident #94's room, NP #2 was at the bedside. NA #3 described that Resident #94 was unable to move in bed without yelling out in pain. NA #3 explained that Resident #94 experienced pain all day on 6/5/2023 and she had to get another NA to assist her with incontinence care for Resident #94 because of her pain level. NA #3 reported Resident #94 said her pain was in her right hip and it was very sharp and severe with any kind of movement and turning for incontinence care was unbearably painful. NA #3 reported on 6/2/2023 Resident #94 was able to get up to the bathroom, but she stayed in bed all day 6/5/2023 and received incontinence care in the bed. A progress note written by NP #2 dated 6/5/2023 documented Resident #94 reported to her that on 6/2/2023 she attempted to go to the bathroom and had a fall with pain in her right hip since (the fall). The NP documented Resident #94 had increased pain/discomfort with touch, no bruising was noted, and the hip appeared to be swollen. The NP documented Resident #94 had pain to the right hip/thigh that Resident #94 rated as 4 and described as aching. The note documented Resident #94 had as needed (acetaminophen) at this time, and staff were to continue to monitor Resident #94 until an x-ray result were received. NP #2 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 2:45 PM. NP #2 reported she was performing the admission assessment on Resident #94 on 6/5/2023 when Resident #94 reported the hip pain and fall. NP #2 explained she ordered an x-ray of Resident #94's hip and when the x-ray was read and it was determined Resident #94 had a fracture, she was sent to the hospital for evaluation. An interview was conducted with NA #4 by phone on 7/25/2023 at 11:10 AM. NA #4 reported she provided Resident #94 with incontinence care on 6/5/2023 during the afternoon shift and Resident #94 was in intense pain all shift. NA #4 reported she attempted to provide incontinence care by herself, and this caused Resident #94 to scream and scream in pain. NA #4 explained that she had to get another NA to assist her with care. NA #4 reported she told Nurse #2 that Resident #94 was in pain. A hip x-ray dated 6/5/2023 and read at 9:39 PM read a right subcapital fracture with moderate displacement (acute right hip fracture). A nursing note dated 6/6/2023 at 12:31 AM documented the results of the hip x-ray were received by the facility at 11:45 PM on 6/5/2023. The on-call NP was paged, and the nurse received an order to send Resident #94 to the hospital for evaluation for the right hip fracture. The note documented that Resident #94 left the facility by ambulance at 12:30 AM. There was no evidence in the medical record that pain medication was ordered on 6/5/2023. The emergency department (ED) provider note dated 6/6/2023 at 1:28 AM documented Resident #94 presented with right hip pain that was found to be fractured on an x-ray obtained outpatient earlier that day. Resident #94 reported she fell three days ago and has had right hip pain ever since. The note documented the x-ray obtained by the facility showed a right hip fracture. On exam the ED physician noted tenderness to the right hip without deformity. Repeat x-rays obtained confirmed a closed subcapital right femoral neck fracture. There was no pain rating, or documentation of medications administered for pain. Orthopedic surgery was consulted and at 3:05 AM recommended for Resident #94 to be admitted and make her NPO (nothing by mouth) status. An orthopedic trauma consult note dated 6/6/2023 at 10:40 AM documented: Patient (Resident #94) reported on Friday 6/2/2023 she was attempting to get up to the bathroom and fell, landing on her right hip. She reported immediate pain in the right hip and being unable to get up after the fall. The history and physical noted: Right lower extremity: skin intact without (redness). Leg length short in comparison to contralateral leg (left leg) and hip held in external rotation (leg was rotated to the right). Endorses (agreed) hip pain with heel strike (touching heel to the floor during mobility). Details in the assessment and plan included the right femoral neck fracture was discussed with Resident #94 and the recommendation was to proceed with the hip hemiarthroplasty, to which she agreed. This plan was also discussed with a family member who agreed and stated Resident #94 was competent to sign her own consents. An orthopedic trauma operative (surgical) report dated 6/7/2023 documented Resident #94 had a right partial hip replacement performed on that date for a right hip fracture. An interview was conducted with the MD on 7/21/2023 at 11:54 AM. The MD reported that his medical group has an on-call triage line where a NP is available 24 hours a day to answer medical questions and provide orders. The MD reported that the facility had not contacted the on-call triage for anything related to Resident #94 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023 or 6/5/2023. The MD reported that delaying treatment for a fractured large bone could have resulted in many complications for Resident #94 and would have been very painful for Resident #94, and he was not aware she did not have an order for pain medication. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 3:21 PM. The DON explained that she had thought Resident #94 had not reported the fall to anyone until 6/5/2023 when NP #2 assessed her. The DON reported she was not aware of the physical therapy assessment conducted on 6/3/2023 and that PT #1 reported to an unknown nurse that Resident #94 had a fall and was experiencing pain. The DON stated she interviewed Resident #94 on 6/5/2023 after the NP evaluation and Resident #94 reported she had fallen and gotten herself up off the floor and did not report the fall to staff. The DON explained staff should have immediately contacted the on-call NP and reported the fall and pain and assessed Resident #94. The DON reported she was not certain why this had not happened on 6/3/2023. The Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 7/21/2023 at 6:42 PM. o Identify those recipients who have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance The facility failed to ensure that Resident #94 was free from neglect. The facility failed to notify the physician of resident changes in condition related to an unwitnessed fall on 6/2/23 until 6/5/23 which resulted in a delay of provision of necessary medical care, treatment, and services for a right hip fracture. The facility failed to address resident pain from 6/2/23 to 6/5/23 that would be associated with a hip fracture. The facility staff failed to follow up on resident reported pain resulting in resident unaddressed pain from 6/3/23 to 6/5/23. Review of Resident #94's Medication Administration revealed no documentation of pain medication being provided to the resident from 6/2/23 through 6/6/23. The facility failed to complete all the facility admission assessments on 6/2/23 for a new admission to ensure preventative measures are in place. There was no evidence from record review and staff interviews that nursing staff completed an assessment of the resident after the fall on 6/2/23 until she was seen by the Nurse Practitioner on 6/5/23. Resident #94's roommate stated she reported Resident #94's fall on 6/2/23 to Nurse #2 on 6/2/23. Nurse #2 denied knowledge of the fall on 6/2/23. On 6/3/23, the physical therapy evaluation revealed that Resident #94 reported to the physical therapist that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room and had not reported the incident to the facility staff. The physical therapist also reported that the resident complained of right hip pain, and this was reported to the Nurse #1 on the hall who reported that she would follow up and obtain an order for an x-ray. Review of the medical record revealed that Nurse #1 did not complete any documentation related to the fall and did not complete a nursing assessment of Resident #94. On 6/5/23, during the Nurse Practitioner initial assessment, resident #94 reported that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room while attempting to go to the bathroom and was having right hip pain. The Nurse Practitioner assessed the resident and noted pain/discomfort to the right hip area, but no bruising was noted. The Nurse Practitioner also noted swelling to the right hip and reported that it appeared that the hip was dislocated. New orders for stat x-ray was given to the nursing staff and to send the resident to the emergency room if x ray results reveal a fracture. On 6/5/23, Resident #94 reported to the Director of Nursing that she had fallen while attempting to go to the bathroom and had gotten herself up off the floor and had not reported this to the staff on 6/2/23. On 6/5/23, the right hip x-ray was obtained. On 6/5/23 at 11:45pm, the licensed nurse received the x ray results which revealed an acute right hip fracture. On 6/6/23 at about 12:30am resident #94 was transported to the emergency room by Emergency Transportation per stretcher for further evaluation. On 6/6/23, Resident #94 was admitted to the hospital and a right hemiarthroplasty was performed on 6/7/23. On 7/20/23, the 3-11 nursing supervisor and the Staff Development Coordinator interviewed Resident #94 and she reported that two black females came into her room and picked her up and put her back in bed after the fall on 6/2/23. Resident #94 reported that she could not remember who they were. All the current residents are at risk as a result of this deficient practice. Starting 7/21/23, Social Services will interview the alert and interviewable residents to ensure that any concerns related to resident abuse/neglect have been identified and addressed by 7/25/23. Starting 7/21/23 a skin assessment will be completed by the Unit Managers on all the current residents to identify any bruising, redness, or swelling that has not been reported or that might require further investigation by 7/25/23. On 7/24/23, the Activities Director will meet with the Resident Council President to request a short Resident Council Meeting to review resident rights and reporting Abuse/Neglect. o Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or recurring, and when the action will be complete. Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator/ Unit Manager/ Director of Nursing/ Nursing supervisor will educate facility staff to include licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNA), certified medication aide (CMA), dietary, housekeeping/ laundry, therapy staff, maintenance, administrative staff, agency and prn staff on the abuse policy and procedures to include examples of Abuse/neglect, abuse prevention, reporting and identifying Abuse and Neglect. The staff will also be made aware that all reports of Abuse and Neglect to include resident care concerns, fall concerns, unaddressed pain, and resident bruising should be reported to the Administrator immediately 7 days a week regardless of the time of the event. The Administrator contact information will be posted at each nursing station, at the time clock and at the receptionist desk. The Staff Development Coordinator and the Director of Nursing will be responsible for ensuring all staff to include licensed nurses, housekeeping/ laundry, dietary, administrative, CNA, and CMA receive the Abuse and Neglect education through validation by the facility employee roster and nursing, housekeeping/laundry, therapy, and dietary schedules. Staff including new hires and prn staff will not be allowed to work without completing this education. The education will be ongoing after 7/25/23 to include new hires and prn staff. Effective 7/21/23, the Administrator will be responsible for ensuring implementation of this immediate jeopardy removal for this alleged non-compliance. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 7/26/2023 On 7/27/2023, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy removal was validated by the following: The facility provided documentation to support their credible allegation for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. The named resident was assessed by the Nurse Practitioner on 6/5/2023 and sent to the hospital for evaluation of pain from a fall sustained on 6/2/2023. The facility also provided documentation of their investigation of the residents fall. The facility interviewed all alert and oriented residents regarding any issues regarding abuse and neglect and completed skin assessments for each resident by 7/25/2023. The facility also had a resident council meeting to review all residents' rights regarding abuse and neglect. The facility provided documentation of audits of resident interviews and skin assessments to ensure continued monitoring for abuse and neglect. All staff (dietary, housekeeping, maintenance, therapy, and nursing) received an in-service education regarding abuse, neglect, and exploitation by 7/25/2023. A sample of staff across these disciplines revealed understanding of the in-service provided for abuse and neglect. The facility further provided the in-service education provided to all facility staff, new orientees, and agency staff before they are allowed to work in the facility. The facility completed the initial skin assessments and interviews, monitoring of all residents, and education for abuse and neglect by 7/25/2023. The facility's date of the immediate jeopardy removal plan of 7/26/2023 was validated on 7/27/2023.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, resident, family, nurse practitioner, physician, and staff interviews, the facility failed to effective...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, resident, family, nurse practitioner, physician, and staff interviews, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for a resident after she experienced a fall and reported pain for 1 of 5 residents investigated for pain management (Resident #94). Resident #94 experienced pain that caused her to yell and scream. The pain affected her ability to go to the bathroom and she became incontinent. Immediately Jeopardy began on 6/3/2023 when Resident #94 reported hip pain to Physical Therapist (PT) #1 and nursing did not effectively manage her pain. Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/26/2023 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of Immediate Jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at a scope and severity level of D (not actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy) for the facility to complete staff training and to ensure monitoring systems put in place are effective. The findings included: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia and frequent falls. The admission nursing assessment recorded by Nurse #6 dated 6/2/2023 documented that Resident #94 was alert and oriented to person and situation. Resident #94 was always continent of bowels and bladder and required a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #94 was oriented to her room and demonstrated correct use of the call light. An interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/20/2023 at 3:30 PM. Resident #94 reported the evening of 6/2/2023 she used her call light to get assistance to use the bathroom, but no staff came to help her, so she got up to go to the bathroom on her own. Resident #94 reported she fell on the floor outside of the bathroom and hit her right hip. Resident #94 explained that she started yelling for help immediately, and her roommate (Resident #50) yelled for help, too. Resident #94 said that 2 nurse aides (NAs) came to her room, picked her up and put her back in bed. Resident #94 recalled her leg hurt terribly and she told the NAs her leg was hurting. Resident #94 was unable to identify the NAs who put her back in bed. Resident #94 explained the therapist (PT #1) came in the next day to see her and she told PT #1 she did not think she could stand up because she fell the night before. PT #1 told Resident #94 she would talk to the nurse. Resident #94 reported her right leg hurt so bad all the time and every time staff moved her in bed, she told them that it hurt. Resident #94 denied that a nurse assessed her after the fall and reported she had not received pain medication. Resident #94 said the NP #2 came in to see her on Monday morning 6/5/2023 and she told the NP that she had fallen and was having right hip pain. A follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #94 on 7/21/2023 at 1:58 PM. Resident #94 recounted the fall on 6/2/2023 and added that she thought she fell after dinner but could not specifically recall the time. Resident #94 explained that she couldn't recall if the lights were on in the bathroom. Resident #94 reported she was wearing slippers on her feet, and she fell against the wall opposite to the bathroom door and hit her right hip. Resident #94 recounted that she screamed and screamed (for help) and 2 ladies (NAs) came and got me into bed, I screamed in pain the entire time. Resident #94 reported I screamed every time I was touched or moved after the fall. I never got pain medication. Resident #94 reported she had called her family member on 6/2/2023 to report the fall. Resident #94 said her pain was 10 out of 10 all the time, they did not do anything for it. Resident #94 explained she had an x-ray that showed her right hip was fractured and she was sent to the hospital. Resident #94 reported she cried about the right leg pain every time someone came into her room and that it was horrible pain. The family member of Resident #94 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 4:19 PM. The family member reported that Resident #94 called him at 7:10 PM on 6/2/2023 to tell him that she had fallen, and she was having pain in her hip. The family member explained that Resident #94 told him 2 staff members had picked her up off the floor, and he didn't think he needed to call the facility to report the fall. The family member reported he came to visit Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and talked to Nurse #1 and reported that Resident #94 had fallen and was having pain. The family member reported that the nurse got acetaminophen (an over-the-counter pain reliever) and administered the medication to Resident #94. The family member explained that he visited again on Sunday, 6/4/2023 and asked the nurse on duty about getting Resident #94 a walker, and he also mentioned the fall and pain to Nurse #8. When asked about the nurse's response, the family member said the nurse did not say anything about the reported fall. The family member reported he had called the admission's staff member and left her a voice mail reporting the fall on Monday, 6/5/2023. The family member explained that an x-ray wasn't ordered until Monday 6/5/2023 after NP #2 examined Resident #94. A pain assessment was ordered on 6/2/2023 to be conducted 3 times per day. A review of the medication orders for Resident #94 revealed no scheduled or as needed pain medications were prescribed for her 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023. Standing orders for the facility, which included acetaminophen, were not transcribed to Resident #94's medical record. The medication administration record for June 2023 was reviewed. No administration of acetaminophen was documented for Resident #94 on 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, or 6/5/2023. No nursing assessments related to pain after a fall were conducted on 6/2/2023. NA #3 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 4:49 PM. NA #3 explained she was working on day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM) on 6/2/2023 when Resident #94 was admitted to the facility, and she had assisted her to the bathroom. NA #3 indicated Resident #94 was able to transfer to the wheelchair and to the toilet by standing and pivoting to sit and the resident had no issues with the transfers or any episodes of incontinence on 6/2/2023. An interview was conducted on 7/21/2023 at 12:04 PM with NA #7 and she reported she provided care to Resident #94 on 6/2/2023 for the afternoon shift. NA #7 reported Resident #94 experienced urinary incontinence, but she did not report pain and she did not report a fall during her shift. The pain assessment for the afternoon shift on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023 was recorded by Nurse #2 and she documented a pain level of 0. (0-10 with 10 being the most intense pain). Nurse #2 was interviewed on 7/19/2023 at 4:05 PM and she reported that she was assigned to Resident #94 during the afternoon shift on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023 had not expressed she was in pain at all to her when Nurse #2 conducted the pain assessments on those dates. A follow up interview with Nurse #2 on 7/25/2023 at 1:44 PM revealed no one reported Resident #94 was experiencing pain on 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023 during her afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported that no one reported Resident #94 had a fall or was experiencing hip pain. Nurse #2 indicated that when she performed the pain assessment for Resident #94 on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023, the resident denied pain. Nurse #2 reported she did not notice swelling or bruising of Resident #94's right leg during any of her shifts. Nurse #2 reported she was aware of the fall when she arrived for work on 6/5/2023 for the afternoon shift. Nurse #2 reported she waited for the x-ray results to call to the physician but was told the results were not sent until after the end of her shift. Nurse #2 denied conducting any assessments on Resident #94, except for the daily shift pain assessment. Night shift (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM) 6/2/2023 pain assessment was recorded as 0 by Nurse #9. An interview was conducted with Nurse #9 by phone on 7/21/2023 at 11:33 AM. Nurse #9 explained that she did not frequently work Resident #94's hallway (C), but she was assigned to that hallway on 6/2/2023. Nurse #9 indicated Resident #94 did not report pain when she performed the pain assessment or at any other time during the shift, and Nurse #9 stated, No, if a resident reported pain, I would have written a note or addressed it in the pain assessment. There was no evidence in the medical record that any nurse notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment of Resident #94 or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/2/2023. Day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM) on 6/3/2023 pain assessment recorded by Nurse #1 documented a pain level of 0'. Nurse #1, an agency nurse, was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 on the day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). Multiple attempts to contact Nurse #1 for an interview were unsuccessful including phone calls with voice messages and text messages. NA #1 was interviewed on 7/20/2023 at 11:57 AM. NA #1 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 for the day shift. NA #1 reported Resident #94 had pain during the weekend when they moved her in bed. NA #1 reported she had reported the pain to Nurse #1 on 6/3/2023. NA #1 reported Resident #94 did not get out of bed on day shift for 6/3/2023 or 6/4/2023 and she required incontinence care in bed because of the right hip pain. NA #6 was interviewed on 7/20/2023 at 12:01 PM and he reported he worked day and evening shift on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 and if Resident #94 had reported pain, he would have reported the pain. The weekend supervisor Nurse #3 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 1:39 PM. Nurse #3 reported she worked 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM and no staff reported that Resident #94 was experiencing pain. A physical therapy evaluation performed by PT #1 and dated 6/3/2023 documented that Resident #94 reported right hip pain from a fall 6/2/2023. The note documented the physical therapist notified the nurse (unnamed) Resident #94 was having pain in her right hip. PT #1 was interviewed by phone on 7/21/2023 at 2:49 PM. PT#1 reported she evaluated Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and she attempted to stand Resident #94 at the bedside, but Resident #94 was unable to stand. The PT explained that Resident #94 and her roommate, Resident #50, told her that Resident #94 fell the night before. Resident #94 reported right hip pain to her with touch. Resident #94 was unable to stand during the evaluation without moderate assistance and was leaning to the right. PT #1 indicated she went to the nursing station and looked for a nurse and reported the fall and the pain that Resident #94 was experiencing. PT #1 reported an unknown nurse and told her she would get an order for an x-ray for Resident #94. PT#1 was not certain the time of day she evaluated Resident #94. PT #1 was unable to provide the name of the nurse or the time she reported to the nurse. The Director of Rehabilitation was interviewed on 7/25/2023 at 8:59 AM by phone. The Director of Rehabilitation reported that PT #1 clocked in to work on 6/3/2023 at 3:46 PM. An occupational therapy evaluation dated 6/3/2023 was reviewed. The evaluation note documented that Resident #94 had pain that interfered or limited functional activity (no location) and that nursing would address pain management. The note documented that Resident #94 reported she had a fall on 6/2/2023 and she had pain in her right leg. The Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 was interviewed on 7/25/2023 at 9:19 AM by phone. OT #1 reported she also assessed Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 and Resident #94 reported she had fallen on 6/2/2023. OT #1 explained that she did not report to the nurse because Resident #94 had told her that the NA staff had helped her get up off the floor. OT #1 indicated that Resident #94 did not have pain during the assessment, but she had not gotten Resident #94 out of bed. An interview was conducted with NA #2 on 7/20/2023 at 2:28 PM. NA #2 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/3/2023 for the afternoon shift. The NA explained that Resident #94 complained of pain in her hip, but she did not report to any nurse because she had observed PT #1 reporting the pain a nurse. NA #2 explained she did not remember the nurse that received the report from PT #1, but she had seen the two of them talking. Resident #94 was unable to get out of bed during the afternoon shift on 6/3/2023 because of the pain she experienced with moving. NA #2 reported she did not notice bruising on Resident #94's right hip. There was no evidence in the medical record that any nurse notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment of Resident #94, or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/3/2023. The pain assessment for day shift on 6/4/2023 was recorded by Nurse #8 as 0. Nurse #8 was interviewed by phone on 7/20/2023 at 1:53 PM and she reported she was assigned to Resident #94 during the day shift on 6/4/2023 and reported Resident #94 had not expressed she was in pain at all to her when Nurse #8 conducted the pain assessment on 6/4/2023. Nurse #8 reported she remembered Resident #94's family member requesting a walker during the day shift on 6/4/2023. Nurse #8 reported she recalled that Resident #94 was very pleasant and not in any pain. Nurse #8 reported that no staff reported a fall to her. The pain assessment for night shift on 6/3/2023 and 6/4/2023 were recorded by Nurse #7 as 0. Nurse #7 was interviewed by phone on 7/21/2023 at 3:15 PM. Nurse #7 reported that Resident #94 had not complained of pain when Nurse #7 conducted the pain assessment during 6/3/2023 or 6/4/2023 on the night shifts. Nurse #7 explained that Resident #94 had an order to administer acetaminophen at 6:00 AM daily and she did administer the medication to her. Nurse #7 reported the resident had not complained of pain, and she had received scheduled acetaminophen at 6:00 AM on 6/3 and 6/4/2023. NA #5 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 11:33 AM. NA #5 reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/4/2023 for the night shift. NA #5 was unable to recall if Resident #94 required incontinence care during her shift and reported that Resident #94 did not complain of pain to her during the night shift. There was no evidence in the medical record that any staff notified the physician of Resident #94's fall and subsequent pain, completed an assessment or that an x-ray was ordered on 6/4/2023. The pain assessment day shift on 6/5/2023 recorded by Nurse #6 documented a pain level of 0. Nurse #6 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 12:10 PM. Nurse #6 reported she was the nurse who admitted Resident #94 on 6/2/2023 and she was also assigned to her on 6/5/2023. Nurse #6 reported Resident #94 did not report pain to her when Nurse #6 conducted the pain assessment., and if she had reported pain, there were facility standing orders she could have activated for administering acetaminophen to Resident #94. Nurse #6 explained that because Resident #94 did not report pain to her, she did not activate the standing orders. During an interview conducted on 7/21/2023 at 4:49 PM, NA #3 reported she returned to work on 6/5/2023 and was assigned to Resident #94 on the day shift, and when she attempted to provide care, Resident #94 yelled in pain my leg, my leg! NA #3 reported on Monday 6/5/2023 for the day shift Resident #94 was in bed with an incontinence brief on and required incontinence care. NA #3 explained she went to get Nurse #6, and when they returned to Resident #94's room, NP #2 was at the bedside. NA #3 described that Resident #94 was unable to move in bed without yelling out in pain. NA #3 explained that Resident #94 experienced pain all day on 6/5/2023 and she had to get another NA to assist her with incontinence care for Resident #94 because of her pain level. NA #3 reported Resident #94 said her pain was in her right hip and it was very sharp and severe with any kind of movement and turning for incontinence care was unbearably painful. NA #3 reported on 6/2/2023 Resident #94 was able to get up to the bathroom, but she stayed in bed all day 6/5/2023 and received incontinence care in the bed. A progress note written by NP #2 dated 6/5/2023 documented Resident #94 reported to her that on 6/2/2023 she attempted to go to the bathroom and had a fall with pain in her right hip since (the fall). The NP documented Resident #94 had increased pain/discomfort with touch, no bruising was noted, and the hip appeared to be swollen. The NP documented Resident #94 had pain to the right hip/thigh that Resident #94 rated as 4 and described as aching. The note documented Resident #94 had as needed (acetaminophen) at this time, and staff were to continue to monitor Resident #94 until an x-ray result were received. NP #2 was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 2:45 PM. NP #2 reported she was performing the admission assessment on Resident #94 on 6/5/2023 when Resident #94 reported the hip pain and fall. NP #2 explained she ordered an x-ray of Resident #94's hip and when the x-ray was read and it was determined Resident #94 had a fracture, she was sent to the hospital for evaluation. An interview was conducted with NA #4 on 7/25/2023 at 11:10 AM. NA #4 reported she provided her with incontinence care on 6/5/2023 during the afternoon shift and Resident #94 was in intense pain all shift. NA #4 reported she attempted to provide incontinence care by herself, and this caused Resident #94 to scream and scream in pain. NA #4 explained that she had to get another NA to assist her with care. NA #4 reported she told Nurse #2 that Resident #94 was in pain. A hip x-ray dated 6/5/2023 and read at 9:39 PM read a right subcapital fracture with moderate displacement (acute right hip fracture). A nursing note dated 6/6/2023 at 12:31 AM documented the results of the hip x-ray were received by the facility at 11:45 PM on 6/5/2023. The on-call NP was paged, and the nurse received an order to send Resident #94 to the hospital for evaluation for the right hip fracture. The note documented that Resident #94 left the facility by ambulance at 12:30 AM. There was no evidence in the medical record that pain medication was ordered on 6/5/2023. The emergency department (ED) provider note dated 6/6/2023 at 1:28 AM documented Resident #94 presented with right hip pain that was found to be fractured on an x-ray obtained outpatient earlier that day. Resident #94 reported she fell three days ago and has had right hip pain ever since. The note documented the x-ray obtained by the facility showed a right hip fracture. On exam the ED physician noted tenderness to the right hip without deformity. Repeat x-rays obtained confirmed a closed subcapital right femoral neck fracture. There was no pain rating, or documentation of medications administered for pain. Orthopedic surgery was consulted and at 3:05 AM recommended for Resident #94 to be admitted and make her NPO (nothing by mouth) status. It was unknown if Resident #94 received pain medication during transport to the hospital for evaluation on 6/6/2023. An orthopedic trauma consult note dated 6/6/2023 at 10:40 AM documented: Patient (Resident #94) reported on Friday 6/2/2023 she was attempting to get up to the bathroom and fell, landing on her right hip. She reported immediate pain in the right hip and being unable to get up after the fall. The history and physical noted: Right lower extremity: skin intact without (redness). Leg length short in comparison to contralateral leg (left leg) and hip held in external rotation (leg was rotated to the right). Endorses (agreed) hip pain with heel strike (touching heel to the floor during mobility). Details in the assessment and plan included the right femoral neck fracture was discussed with Resident #94 and the recommendation was to proceed with the hip hemiarthroplasty, to which she agreed. This plan was also discussed with a family member who agreed and stated Resident #94 was competent to sign her own consents. An interview was conducted with the MD on 7/21/2023 at 11:54 AM. The MD reported that his medical group has an on-call triage line where a NP is available 24 hours a day to answer medical questions and provide orders. The MD reported that the facility had not contacted the on-call triage for anything related to Resident #94 6 /2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, or 6/5/2023. The MD reported that delaying treatment for a fractured large bone would have been very painful for Resident #94, and he was not aware she did not have an order for pain medication. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 7/21/2023 at 3:21 PM. The DON explained that she had thought Resident #94 had not reported the fall to anyone until 6/5/2023 when NP #2 assessed her. The DON reported she was not aware of the physical therapy assessment conducted on 6/3/2023 and that PT #1 reported to an unknown nurse that Resident #94 had a fall and was experiencing pain. The DON stated she interviewed Resident #94 on 6/5/2023 after the NP evaluation and Resident #94 reported she had fallen and gotten herself up off the floor and did not report the fall to staff. The DON explained staff should have immediately contacted the on-call NP and reported the fall and pain and assessed Resident #94. The DON reported she was not certain why this had not happened on 6/3/2023. The Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 7/21/2023 at 6:42 PM. o Identify those recipients who have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance The facility failed to notify the physician and/or the resident representative after Resident #94 reported to the Physical Therapist on 6/3/23 that she had fallen in her room on 6/2/23. On 6/3/23, the physical therapy evaluation revealed that Resident #94 reported to the physical therapist that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room and had not reported the incident to the facility staff. The physical therapist also reported that the resident complained of right hip pain, and this was reported to the Nurse #1 on the hall who reported that she would follow up and obtain an order for an x-ray. On 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing spoke to Nurse #1, and she denied any knowledge of Resident #94 reporting that she had fallen or that the physical therapist or any other staff member reporting to her that Resident #94 had fallen. In addition, Nurse #1 was asked if Resident #94 requested pain medication or had signs or symptoms of pain and Nurse #1 reported no. On, 7/20/23, the Therapy Director spoke to the physical therapist that was working on 6/3/23 and she reported that Resident #94 had reported to her that she had fallen on 6/2/23 while attempting to go to the bathroom. The physical therapist reported that the roommate also reported that the resident had fallen on the previous day (6/2/23). On 6/5/23, after the Nurse Practitioner reported that Resident #94 reported a fall on 6/2/23, the Director of Nursing completed a follow up interview and Resident #94 reported that she had fallen while attempting to go to the bathroom and had gotten herself up off the floor and had not reported this to the staff. On 6/5/23, Unit Manager #1 and the Admissions Director spoke to Resident #94's family member who reported that on 6/2/23, Resident #94 had reported to him that she had fallen on the way to the bathroom and that she was having a lot of pain. The family member reported that he reported that Resident #94 was having pain to the charge nurse. On 6/5/23, during the Nurse Practitioner initial assessment, Resident #94 reported that she had fallen on 6/2/23 in her room while attempting to go to the bathroom and was having right hip pain. On 7/17/23, the facility investigation by the Director of Nursing revealed that the Nurse Practitioner was informed of Resident #94's fall on 6/2/23 during her initial assessment on 6/5/23 by the resident. In addition, further review of the medical record revealed that there was no fall nursing assessment documentation or physician/physician extender notification documentation by the licensed nurse of the 6/2/23 fall until 6/5/2023. The Director of Nursing completed the interviews on 7/21/23. The interviews revealed that the licensed nurses and the certified nursing assistants that worked on 6/2/23, 6/3/23, and 6/4/23 reported that Resident #94 did not report to them that she had fallen on 6/2/23. The licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, and certified medication aide interviews by the Director of Nursing of staff that who worked on 6/2/23, 6/3/23, and 6/4/23 per the nursing assignment sheets revealed that Resident #94 did not report the fall to the assigned licensed nurse, certified nursing assistant or certified medication aide. On 7/17/23, Nurse #3 (Weekend Supervisor) interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that Resident #94 did not express pain concerns and she did not observe signs or symptoms of excruciating pain on 6/3/23 and 6/4/23. Nurse # 3 also reported that Resident #94 as well as the other nursing staff to include the physical therapist who worked on 6/3/23 and 6/4/23, did not report that Resident #94 has fallen on 6/2/23. Nurse #3 reported that Resident #94's family member did not report to her that the resident was having pain and that the resident had fallen on 6/2/23. All current residents are also at risk as a result of this deficient practice. Starting 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing/the Unit Managers and designee will complete an audit of the medical records to include review of progress notes, outside provider notes, incident reports, medication administration records, physician orders, and nursing shift reports of all the current residents for the last 60 days to ensure the physician/ physician extenders and resident representatives have been notified of any resident falls or changes in condition and identified concerns have been address by 7/25/23. Starting 7/21/23 the Director of Nursing / designee will complete interviews of the alert current residents to ensure resident concerns to include incident and accidents, pain management, medication/ treatments and other resident care concerns have been identified and reported to the physician/ physician extenders in the last 60 days by 7/25/23. Starting 7/21/23, the Director of Nursing/ designee will complete interviews of the facility staff to include licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, certified medication aides, dietary, housekeeping/laundry, agency, new hire and prn staff to ensure all resident changes in condition or any reported concerns in the last 60 days have been reported to the DON, Unit Manager and/or the Nursing supervisor by 7/25/23. o Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or recurring, and when the action will be complete Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator/ designee will complete education by 7/25/23 of the facility staff to include licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants, certified medication aides, dietary, therapy department, housekeeping/laundry, agency, new hire and prn staff related to ensuring resident changes in condition to include incident and accidents, pain management changes, medication/treatment concern, resident care concerns and any resident/families reported concerns have been reported to the licensed nurse and to the physician and/or DON, Unit Managers and nursing supervisor. Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator/ designee will complete education with the licensed nurses to include agency, new hire, and prn licensed nurses related to immediate notification and documentation of resident changes in condition to include incident and accidents, pain management changes, medication/treatment concern, resident care concerns and any resident/ families reported concerns to the physician/ physician extenders and resident representatives and document in the medical record by 7/25/23. After hours the licensed nurse will notify the on-call provider and document in the medical record. Starting 7/21/23, the Staff Development Coordinator was made aware by the Director of Nursing that she will be responsible for verifying that the education has been completed by the required staff members by using the facility personal roster and the nursing, dietary, therapy and housekeeping/laundry staffing schedules to include new hires, agency and prn staff and ongoing education by 7/25/23. No staff will be allowed to work until they have received this education. The SDC/ designee which includes the DON, Unit Managers, and Nursing supervisors will be responsible for providing all of the education. On 7/25/23, The Director of Nursing educated the therapy manager to ensure that all therapists to include occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech therapist, weekend therapist, new hire, and prn therapist report resident observed and reported falls to the therapy manager and the Director of Nursing immediately. Starting 7/25/23, the therapy manager will educate the therapists to include occupational therapist, physical therapist, speech therapist, weekend therapist, new hire, and prn therapist related to ensuring resident observed and reported falls are immediately reported to the therapy manager and the Director of Nursing. Therapy staff to include prn and new hire staff will not be allowed to until they receive this education. Effective 7/21/2023 the Administrator will be responsible for ensuring implementation of this immediate jeopardy removal for this alleged non-compliance. Alleged Date of IJ Removal: 7/26/2023 On 7/227/2023, the facility's credible allegation for immediate jeopardy removal was validated by the following: The facility provided documentation to support the Credible Allegation for F697. The facility's Nurse Practitioner assessed the named resident and sent her to the hospital for evaluation of a right subcapital fracture. The facility further provided documentation of pain assessment for all residents in the facility. The facility further provided auditing of pain assessments, pain documentation, pain medication management, and pain care plan updates for all residents in the facility. An in-service education was completed with the nursing and therapy staff regarding resident pain identification, signs of pain, management of pain medication, documentation of pain, and update of the care plan. The facility further provided the education that will be provided to all new hires and agency staff regarding pain management before being allowed to work in the facility. Facility nursing staff were interviewed regarding their understanding of the education provided. The assessment of the named resident and all other residents; the auditing of pain assessments, documentation, medication management, and care plan update; and the education of staff were completed by 7/25/2023. The facility's date of the immediate jeopardy removal plan of 7/26/2023 was validated on 7/27/2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that addressed the needs of a resident with a history of frequent falls for 1 of 29 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #94). The findings included: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #94 included difficulty walking, frequent falls, and Parkinson's disease. A review of the medical record revealed no baseline care plan was in place for Resident #94 dated 6/2, 6/3, 6/4 or 6/5/2023. Resident #94 was discharged to the hospital on 6/5/2023. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #94 had a fall since admission with a major injury. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed a baseline care plan was created on 7/2/2023. An interview was conducted with Nurse #6 on 7/21/2023 at 12:10 PM. Nurse #6 reported she admitted Resident #94 from home on 6/2/2023 and it was about 2:00 PM when Resident #94 arrived at the facility. Nurse #6 reported she had not initiated the baseline care plan for Resident #94 because she had arrived late in her shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). Nurse #2 was interviewed on 7/19/2023 at 4:05 PM and she reported she was assigned to Resident #94 on 6/2/2023, 6/3/2023, 6/4/2023, and 6/5/2023 during the afternoon shift (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM). Nurse #2 reported she was not aware a baseline care plan had not been initiated on admission for Resident #94. An interview was conducted with the MDS nurse on 7/26/2023 at 2:44 PM. The MDS nurse reported the admission nurse should initiate the baseline care plan on admission. The Unit Manager, Nurse #5 was interviewed on 7/27/2023 at 10:53 AM. Nurse #5 reported the interdisciplinary team discusses new admissions in the morning meeting, but because Resident #94 was admitted on a Friday afternoon, they did not discuss her until Monday 6/5/2023. Nurse #5 explained the facility had just learned Resident #94's fall on 6/2/2023 and the team was focusing on getting her treatment and did not address the baseline care plan. An interview was conducted at the same time with the Director of Nursing (DON) and she reported a baseline care plan should have been initiated by the admission nurse or the nurse after and she was not certain why a baseline care plan had not been started for Resident #94. The DON reported she expected all new admissions to have a baseline care plan in place within 24 hours of admission.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to maintain the exterior facility grounds clean, free of broken equipment and trash and repair broken floor tiles in the kitchen. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to maintain the exterior facility grounds clean, free of broken equipment and trash and repair broken floor tiles in the kitchen. This failure occurred for one to nine months. The findings included: 1. On 7/19/23 at 1:42 PM, an observation of the exterior facility grounds revealed two commercial dumpsters. One dumpster was open without a lid, filled with cardboard and no room for additional storage. The second commercial dumpster's lid was closed with room for additional storage. The following broken items were observed stored on the ground or propped against the facility: Multiple boards of sheet rock, propped against the facility. One broken shower chair stored on the ground. Four cement stairs stored on the ground. Five wooden pallets, broken, stored on the ground. One black leather chair, broken and stored on the ground. One used surgical face mask, stored on the ground. Four particle board headboards and footboards, broken, propped against the facility shed. One used glove, laying on the ground. Two recliner chairs, broken, stored on the ground next to the open commercial dumpster. Three empty cardboard boxes, stored on the ground. An interview with the Maintenance Director occurred on 7/19/23 at 1:45 PM. The Maintenance Director stated he started this role in November 2022, and he had been waiting several months for the broken items stored outside to be picked up by the waste removal company. He stated that the cement stairs had been stored outside since the previous year. He stated the stairs were used to access a mobile kitchen the facility used in the summer of 2022. He stated he placed the broken black leather chair from the facility's van outside about a month ago. He stated that all the other broken items were placed outside a few weeks ago. He stated that he was in the process of moving the broken items to the dumpster, but he was waiting on the commercial dumpsters to be emptied. He stated that typically the commercial dumpsters were emptied once every two weeks, but that he had been waiting several weeks now for the waste removal company to empty them. The Maintenance Director stated he was aware these items were left on the ground and that it was his responsibility to maintain the grounds of the facility clean. The Administrator stated in an interview on 7/20/23 at 3:07 PM that he was aware that broken equipment and other items were stored on the ground outside the facility and that these items should be placed in the commercial dumpster. He stated that the facility was currently undergoing renovations and so they secured a second commercial dumpster to store trash, but that emptying the commercial dumpster was not on a schedule. He stated that the waste removal company emptied the commercial dumpsters at will, and that the facility was currently waiting for the dumpsters to be emptied so that the broken items could be placed in the dumpster for removal. 2. An observation of the kitchen on 7/17/23 at 11:28 AM revealed multiple broken and missing floor tiles in the dish pit area with water pooling on the floor. A second observation of the same occurred on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the floor tiles in the dish pit area had been broken/missing for a while, since piping was replaced in the kitchen last year. The DM stated that as a result, water pooled on the floor where the tiles were broken/missing and staff mopped this area daily, but water still pooled there. The Maintenance Director stated in an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:45 PM that he was aware of the broken/missing floor tiles in the kitchen. He stated the floor tiles were in disrepair since piping underneath the kitchen floor was repaired in the summer of 2022, when the facility had a mobile kitchen. He stated repairs to the piping took a while and he just needed to identify a time when we could get in the kitchen and repair the broken tiles and replace the missing tiles when there was no activity going on in the kitchen. The Administrator stated in an interview on 7/20/23 at 3:07 PM that the piping underneath the kitchen floor was repaired in the summer of 2022 and as a result a few floor tiles still needed repair. He stated that he expected these repairs to be made.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of one freezer free of accumulated ice and remove pooled water on the kitchen floor. This failure occurr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of one freezer free of accumulated ice and remove pooled water on the kitchen floor. This failure occurred for approximately four months and had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: 1. An observation of the walk-in freezer occurred on 7/17/23 at 11:45 AM. A metal storage rack approximately 11 inches in height was observed with milk crates stored on top. The milk crates were approximately 11 inches in height. Multiple cases of carrot coins, crinkle cut French fries and garlic bread were stored on top of the milk crates. Ice was observed on top of these cases of food items and the ice extended to the floor, approximately 22 inches and pooled on the floor around the base of the metal storage rack. The ice was also observed inside the cases of food items and on the food. The freezer compressor was observed with ice accumulation and water dripping. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated in an interview on 7/17/23 at 11:45 AM that compressor had been leaking for the past two weeks, the Maintenance Director was aware and ordered a part for repair, but that the part had not arrived yet. The DM stated that she and the Maintenance Director were trying to remove the ice buildup in the interim, but that due to amount of water leaking from the compressor, the ice accumulation was hard to keep removed. An interview with the Maintenance Director occurred on 7/17/23 at 12:12 PM. He stated that in February 2023 he called for a repair service to repair the freezer because the compressor was leaking. He stated part of the repairs were completed, but that a part that was needed to complete the repairs had been ordered, but had not arrived. He stated the repair service came to the facility a few weeks ago to complete the repairs, and identified a part that was needed and ordered the part. The Maintenance Director stated that the compressor was leaking and that he tried to remove the ice accumulation as often as possible. He said he saw the ice accumulation on Friday, 7/14/23 and spoke to the DM about coming up with a plan to remove the ice build-up, but that he had not had a chance to address it yet. He stated that he would start checking for ice accumulation more frequently and develop a plan for removing the ice accumulation until the part came in for repair. The Maintenance Director provided a copy of the invoice from the repair service provider. The date of the invoice was 2/5/23 and recorded the reason for the call was to repair the walk-in freezer and add refrigerant to the walk-in cooler. The lock to the compressor of the walk-in freezer was recorded as rusted and leaking and broke off during the repair. It was replaced. The drain line heater to the compressor was also in need of repair allowing the drain to freeze up. This repair was still incomplete. The Administrator was interviewed on 7/20/23 at 3:10 PM and stated he was aware that the facility was waiting on a part to repair the compressor in the freezer. He stated that the ice should be removed in the interim while the facility waited on the part for repair. 2. An observation of the kitchen on 7/17/23 at 11:28 AM revealed puddles of brown colored water pooled on the floor in the dish pit area where missing/broken floor tiles were observed. A second observation of the same occurred on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM. Review of vendor service reports dated 3/27/23 and 6/19/23 recorded kitchen sanitation recommendations to remove excess water noted in the dish pit area, and to keep the area clean/dry. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the floor tiles in the dish pit area had been broken/missing for a while, since piping was replaced in the kitchen last year. The DM stated that as a result, water pooled on the floor where the tiles were broken/missing and staff mopped this area daily, but water still pooled there. The Administrator stated in an interview on 7/20/23 at 3:07 PM that the piping underneath the kitchen floor was repaired in the summer of 2022 and as a result a few floor tiles still needed repair. He stated that he expected the dish pit area to be kept clean and the floor dry.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place following the 8/31/2021 infection control and complaint investigation survey, 2/14/2022 recertification and complaint investigation, 7/29/2022 complaint investigation survey. The facility had deficiencies previously cited in the areas of notification of change (F580), baseline care plans (F655) and kitchen sanitation (F812). F580 was cited on 8/31/2021 during a complaint investigation and infection control survey, on 2/14/2022 during a recertification and complaint investigation survey, and on 7/29/2022 during a complaint investigation survey; F655 was cited on 2/14/2022 during recertification and complaint investigation survey and F812 was cited on 2/14/2022 during a recertification and complaint investigation and on 7/29/2022 during a complaint investigation. These deficiencies were cited again during the facility's current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 7/28/2023. The continued failure of the facility during four federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F580-Based on record reviews, resident, family, nurse practitioner (NP), physician (MD), and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the MD of a resident who experienced pain following a fall for 1 of 3 residents investigated for notification of changes. The resident sustained a fall on 6/2/2023 and reported the fall and right hip pain to Physical Therapist (PT) #1 on 6/3/2023. PT #1 reported the fall and the hip pain to a nurse. The resident reported the fall and right hip pain when she was assessed by NP#2 on 6/5/2023. NP#2 ordered an x-ray of the right hip, which revealed a fractured femur (the long bone in the leg). She was sent to the hospital on 6/6/2023 at 12:30 AM and had a partial hip replacement surgery on 6/7/2023. During the focused infection control and complaint investigation survey conducted on 7/29/22 the facility was cited for failing to notify a Resident's Physician when two doses of an anticonvulsant (anti-seizure) medication were not available to administer on 03/18/22. The resident had two episodes of seizure activity and required two hospitalizations to control the seizure activity on 03/19/22-03/21/22 and 03/24/22-03/28/22 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication management. During the recertification and complaint investigation survey conducted on 2/14/22 the facility was cited for failing to notify a Resident's Physician when two different blood pressure medications were not available for administration on 07/21/21 and 07/22/21; and when the blood pressure reading was out of normal range for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication management. During the focused infection control and complaint investigation survey conducted on 8/31/22 the facility was cited for failing to notify the provider of skin assessment changes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. F655- Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that addressed the needs of a resident with a history of frequent falls for 1 of 29 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. During the recertification and complaint investigation survey conducted on 2/14/22 the facility was cited for failing to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address the immediate needs of a resident for enteral feedings or identify the correct smoking status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. F812-Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility records, the facility failed to maintain one of one freezer free of accumulated ice and remove pooled water on the kitchen floor. This failure occurred for approximately four months and had the potential to affect food served to residents. During the recertification and complaint investigation survey conducted on 2/14/22 the facility was cited for failing to 1) thaw a potentially hazardous food with an effective food safety system, and 2) store cold/frozen foods sealed and with a label and date of opening. The facility thawed frozen diced ham, that was not submerged, under running water with a temperature of 93.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility stored hot dogs, sliced ham, sliced turkey, French fries, pancakes, sliced cheese and chicken tenders without a label and date of opening and open to air. This failure occurred in 2 of 3 cold storage units and had the potential to affect food served to residents. During the focused infection control and complaint investigation survey conducted on 7/29/22 the facility was cited for failing to perform hand hygiene for 1 of 3 dietary staff (Dietary Aide #1), monitor refrigerator temperatures for 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerators, store potentially hazardous cold foods at least 41 degrees Fahrenheit (milk, pimento cheese sandwiches and a bologna sandwich), and store pans (muffin pans, sheet pans) and a cutting board clean. This deficient practice had the potential to affect food served to residents. During an interview with the Administrator on 7/27/2023 at 1:43 pm he stated the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meets monthly and the Medical Director and Pharmacist are present for the meeting every 3 months. The Administrator stated the other members of the QAPI team are at the monthly meeting, which includes the Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Maintenance Director, Housekeeping Director, Therapy Manager, and Dietary Manager. The Administrator stated the facility uses their quality measures, grievances, resident weights, wounds, and trends for infections as areas to improve. The Administrator stated he was not sure of why the facility had repeated concerns in the current survey since he had just started in the facility on 12/1/2022. He stated the facility would continue to work on the issues brought up during the survey and strive to improve.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by observations of current pest activity in 3 of 3 resident rooms, on two of two units, and the conference room. The facility failed to utilize insect light traps and implement pest service recommendations for four months to prevent reoccurring pest activity. The findings included: 1 a. Observations of live pest activity occurred on the following: - On 7/17/23 at 12:33 PM, flies were observed flying around the covered lunch meal tray that was stored on the over bed table in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the A/B unit. - On 7/17/23 at 12:55 PM, multiple small flying insects were observed flying around the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the C/D unit. - On 7/17/23 at 12:59 PM, flies were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] on the C/D unit. - On 7/19/23 at 11:21 AM, multiple flies were observed on the C/D unit flying around the open food cart. - On 7/19/23 at 11:44 AM a spider was observed crawling on the floor in the conference room. - On 7/19/23 from 12:35 PM to 12:49 PM, flies were observed on the C/D unit around an open food cart. 1 b. On 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM, two wall mounted insect light traps were observed unplugged in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager (DM) was interviewed during the observation and stated that she had not noticed these wall mounted insect light traps before and that she did not know what they were for. The DM stated she had not noticed that the insect light traps were unplugged. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:12 PM, dietary staff #1 stated that she unplugged the insect light trap in the cook's prep area to use the electrical outlet and forgot to plug it back in. The Maintenance Director stated in an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:45 PM, that he noticed that the two insect light traps in the kitchen were unplugged, but that he was not sure who unplugged them or why. He stated they should be plugged in to deter pest activity. 1 c. An observation of the kitchen on 7/17/23 at 11:28 AM revealed puddles of brown colored water pooled on the floor in the dish pit area where missing/broken floor tiles were observed. A second observation of the same occurred on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM. Pest control service reports dated 3/27/23 and 6/19/23, both recommended to remove excess water noted in the dish pit area, and to keep the area clean/dry to reduce pest activity. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 1:10 PM the DM stated she was aware of the pest service reports and recommendations. The DM stated that the floor tiles in the dish pit area had been broken/missing for a while, since piping was replaced in the kitchen floor last year. The DM stated that as a result, water pooled on the floor where the tiles were broken/missing and staff mopped this area daily, but water still pooled there. 1 d. On 7/19/23 at 1:42 PM, an observation of the exterior facility grounds revealed multiple broken items stored on the ground or propped against the facility: Multiple boards of sheet rock, propped against the facility. One broken shower chair stored on the ground. Four cement stairs stored on the ground. Five wooden pallets, broken, stored on the ground. One black leather chair, broken and stored on the ground. One used surgical face mask, stored on the ground. Four particle board headboards and footboards, broken, propped against the facility shed. One used glove, laying on the ground. Two recliner chairs, broken, stored on the ground next to the open commercial dumpster. Three empty cardboard boxes, stored on the ground. A pest control service report dated 4/19/23, recommended the removal of medical equipment left outside, against the building to reduce the number of pests entering the facility. An interview with the Maintenance Director occurred on 7/19/23 at 1:45 PM. The Maintenance Director stated he started this role in November 2022, and he had been waiting several months for the broken items stored outside to be picked up by the waste removal company. He stated that the cement stairs had been stored outside since the previous year and were used to access a mobile kitchen the facility used in the summer of 2022. He stated he placed the broken black leather chair from the facility's van outside about a month ago. He stated that all the other broken items were placed outside a few weeks ago. He stated that he was in the process of moving the broken items to the dumpster, but he was waiting on the commercial dumpsters to be emptied. He stated that typically the commercial dumpsters were emptied once every two weeks, but that he had been waiting several weeks now for the waste removal company to empty them. The Maintenance Director stated he was aware these items were left on the ground and that it was his responsibility to maintain the grounds of the facility clean. The Administrator stated in an interview on 7/20/23 at 3:07 PM that the insect light traps should be plugged in for use. He stated that the piping underneath the kitchen floor was repaired in the summer of 2022 and as a result a few floor tiles still needed repair. He stated that he expected the dish pit area to be kept clean and the floor dry. He stated that he was aware that broken equipment and other items were stored on the ground outside the facility and that these items should be placed in the commercial dumpster. He stated that the facility was currently undergoing renovations and so they secured a second commercial dumpster to store trash, but that emptying the commercial dumpster was not on a schedule. He stated that the waste removal company emptied the commercial dumpsters at will, and that the facility was currently waiting for the dumpsters to be emptied so that the broken items could be placed in the dumpster for removal.
Feb 2022 12 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0624 (Tag F0624)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to perform the dressing change the day of discharge...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to perform the dressing change the day of discharge, provide discharge instructions for the care of a newly acquired right heel pressure ulcer; in addition, the facility failed to provide the information needed for the family to set up the wound clinic appointment at discharge for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge (Resident #328). Resident #328 was admitted to the hospital the day after discharge with a blood infection, severe heel pain and a wound infection. Findings included: Resident #328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. Resident #328's diagnoses included high blood pressure, recent motor vehicle accident with multiple rib fractures and fractures of both hands, peripheral vascular disease and aortic valve stenosis. A nurse progress note dated 07/25/21 at 2:32 PM stated Resident #328 complained of pain in her right foot. The nurse removed her sock, and the resident was noted to have a new 2.5 centimeter(cm) x 3.0 cm open blister to her right heel. The area was cleansed, a petroleum based non-stick gauze was placed and a dressing was applied. A physician order was written by the NP on 07/26/21 for a wound consult and daily dressing for the right heel ulcer for Resident #328. Record review of the NP discharge note dated 07/27/21 noted the patient was to go home with health home. The NP indicated Resident #328 had the pressure ulcer (PU) on her right heel and the heel and foot were wrapped. The NP recommended the resident was to follow up with outpatient wound care and to follow up with her Primary Care Provider. Resident #328 was discharged on 07/28/21 before the wound consult was done. Review of the nurse progress note from 07/28/21 indicated the pressure ulcer dressing was not done prior to discharge home. The nurse progress noted dated 07/28/21 at 4:02 PM indicated the heel PU dressing was not done by Nurse #9 due to Resident #328 being discharged home. The instructions provided to Resident #328 and a family member at discharge did not include any information for pressure ulcer care. The Home Health Certification form dated 7/27/21 completed by the NP noted recommend outpatient wound care and follow up with Primary Care Provider. No wound care physician was listed, no contact information or appointment. A phone interview was conducted with Nurse #9 on 01/31/22 at 9:02 AM who had cared for Resident #328 on 7/28/21. She had vague recollection of a resident with casts on her arms but was unable to answer other questions. Record review indicated a Social Services note from 07/28/21 at 2:10 PM that Resident #328 was discharged home with a family member. A phone interview was conducted on 02/14/22 at 12:32 PM with Resident #328's family member. She stated the nurse did not do her mother's heel dressing before her discharge on [DATE]. She also noted the facility never instructed her on how to take care of the wound. The family member stated the resident had been vomiting for two days and was vomiting the day of discharge. She stated the physician was not notified of vomiting the day of discharge. The family member said, if they would have just told me what to do with her foot and sent supplies, she could have done it. The family member stated she was told to follow up with wound care, but she had no clue what to do to get a wound care physician's appointment. She stated she had called one place and was told they required more information. She said setting up the wound care referral was left completely up to her-no names or contact numbers were given. The family member stated she ended up taking her back to the hospital the next day with terrible pain from the pressure ulcer and she was still vomiting, as she had been for 3 days. The family member noted the wound was terribly infected and she had a blood infection from the pressure ulcer. She said the discharge nurse had not notified the physician of the vomiting that day. She said the hospital set up the wound care referral, placed a wound vacuum assisted closure device on the heel and coordinated home health when she was discharged home on [DATE] after her readmission. Review of hospital records following discharge from the Skilled Nursing Facility dated 07/29/21-08/16/21 indicated Resident #328 was diagnosed with a right foot infection and bacteremia (infection of the blood) related to the pressure ulcer. Her creatinine level (kidney function) was elevated at 1.20 (normal 0.51-0.95) and she was given 1 liter of intravenous fluids. The pressure ulcer on hospital admission was described as very red and inflamed with overlying black eschar (dead tissue). The heel wound measured 3.0 centimeters (cm) x 3.0 cm. The resident underwent a right heel wound debridement on 08/07/21.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to notify a Resident's Physician when tw...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to notify a Resident's Physician when two different blood pressure medications were not available for administration on 07/21/21 and 07/22/21; and when the blood pressure reading was out of normal range for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #328). Findings included: Resident #328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #328's diagnoses included hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and aortic valve stenosis, multiple rib fractures and bilateral hand fractures from motor vehicle accident. The 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 07/28/21 indicated Resident #328 was cognitively intact. The admission orders from 07/21/21 indicated Resident #328 was to receive the medications to reduce the blood pressure (BP) of Quinapril Hydrochloride (HCL) 40 mg twice daily and Atenolol-Chlorthalidone tablet 100-25 mg tablet once each day. Review of Resident #328's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the 07/21/21 9:00 PM dose of Quinapril Hydrochloride (HCL) 40 mg was not administered by Nurse #4. This medication was to control high blood pressure. Nurse #4 noted other/see nurse's notes on the MAR for the 07/21/21 9:00 PM Quinapril dose. The Nurse Progress note from 07/21/21 at 9:00PM by Nurse #4 indicated the facility was waiting on delivery from pharmacy for Quinapril HCL for Resident #328. A phone interview was conducted with Nurse #4 on 02/01/22 at 10:44 AM regarding the 9:00 PM dose of Quinapril HCL for Resident #328 on 07/21/21 for Resident #328. She did not recall the missing med but stated if medications were not available, she would call the pharmacy and depending on what pharmacy told her, she would page the Doctor or Nurse Practitioner (NP), tell them the status and put the medication on hold till it was available. She said she would document in a nursing note that pharmacy was called and then page the NP and document the NP's response. She was informed there was no note about notifying the Practitioner in her notes and stated, I don't recall. Resident #328's blood pressure on 07/22/21 at 2:59 AM was 191/88. No notification was documented that the Physician/NP was called. Record review indicated Resident #328's blood pressure (BP) medication Atenolol-Chlorthalidone tablet 100-25 mg tablet ordered daily was not given for the 07/22/21 9:00 AM dose. Nurse #5 noted 9 on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Per legend on the MAR this indicated other/see nurse's notes. The Nurse Progress note dated 7/22/21 at 9:08 AM by Nurse #5 indicated the Atenolol-Chlorthalidone medication for Resident #328 was on backorder per slip from pharmacy. Nurse #5 was interviewed via phone on 02/01/22 at 8:39 AM regarding the BP medication not given to Resident #328 on 07/22/22 at 9:00 AM. The nurse said with new admissions, everything was not always there, and she called and let the pharmacy know. She said she was sure she notified the doctor, and she thought she may not have documented the call. She stated she did not remember the scenario with the BP medication for Resident #328. A phone interview with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 02/01/22 at 12:09 PM revealed she would have expected that the blood pressure of 191/88 would have been rechecked when it was elevated, and the NP or Physician to be notified of the elevated BP reading. The NP further stated she would have also expected to be notified if the blood pressure medications were not available. The NP stated the resident's body was trying to compensate from not having the medications. She said there was a potential for harm from missing the two doses, but she had no harm, as she had other BP medicines she was receiving, and her BP came back down. A phone interview was conducted on 02/01/22 at 2:10 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the Physician/NP not being notified of the elevated BP and the two BP medications that were not available. She stated if the BP medications were not available, and they were not available in the facility medication dispensing machine, the nurse was to call pharmacy. If the medication would not be available within 1 hour before or after the time the dose was due, the nurse was to call the Physician or the NP and obtain orders. The DON noted if the BP was above normal range or above the resident's baseline, the nurse should recheck with a manual BP cuff and report abnormalities to the Physician or NP. She said these actions should be documented in the resident's record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Resident #374 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of altered mental status and kidney failure. Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Resident #374 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of altered mental status and kidney failure. Resident #374's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was observed as not completed. The Regional MDS Coordinator was interviewed on 1/26/22 at 2:45 pm. She stated that there was no facility MDS Coordinator during most of December 2021 into January 2022. She stated the MDS would have to be completed and submitted. On 1/27/22 at 5:00 pm an interview was conducted with the Administrator. She stated that she was aware that some of the MDS were not completed due to the facility MDS coordinator not being available. The Regional MDS Coordinator was going to complete and submit the required MDS. Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 4 of 26 MDS reviewed (Resident #70, #324, #64, #374), and failed to complete Care Area Assessments (CAA) for 3 out of 26 CAAs reviewed (Resident #70, #324, #64). Findings included: 1. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility 11/24/2021 and readmitted [DATE]. The admission MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/28/2021 and the CAA was not completed until 1/19/2022. The facility MDS nurse was not available for interview on 1/27/2022. The regional MDS consultant was interviewed on 1/27/2022 at 4:08 PM. The regional MDS nurse reported the facility MDS nurse was on leave from 12/9/2021 to the middle of January 2022. The regional MDS consultant explained that she and other MDS nurses from sister facilities were assisting to open MDS assessments and complete them during the time the facility MDS consultant was on leave, but the other facilities started having COVID-19 outbreaks and the priority shifted for those MDS nurses. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:15 PM. The Administrator reported the facility MDS nurse had been on leave for most of December 2021 and half of January 2022. The Administrator reported the MDS nurses who were helping with the MDS assessments at the facility had outbreaks in their facilities and were unable to assist with the timely completion of MDS, CAA, and care plans. 2. Resident #324 was admitted to the facility 1/5/2022. The admission MDS ARD was 1/12/2022. The MDS was not completed and marked in progress with sections incomplete. The facility MDS nurse was not available for interview on 1/27/2022. The regional MDS consultant was interviewed on 1/27/2022 at 4:08 PM. The regional MDS nurse reported the facility MDS nurse was on leave from 12/9/2021 to the middle of January 2022. The regional MDS consultant explained that she and other MDS nurses from sister facilities were assisting to open MDS assessments and complete them during the time the facility MDS consultant was on leave, but the other facilities started having COVID-19 outbreaks and the priority shifted for those MDS nurses. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:15 PM. The Administrator reported the facility MDS nurse had been on leave for most of December 2021 and half of January 2022. The Administrator reported the MDS nurses who were helping with the MDS assessments at the facility had outbreaks in their facilities and were unable to assist with the timely completion of MDS, CAA, and care plans. 3. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility 12/15/2021. The admission MDS with an ARD of 12/22/2021 was completed on 1/9/2022. The CAA and care plan decisions were also completed on 1/9/2022. The facility MDS nurse was not available for interview on 1/27/2022. The regional MDS consultant was interviewed on 1/27/2022 at 4:08 PM. The regional MDS nurse reported the facility MDS nurse was on leave from 12/9/2021 to the middle of January 2022. The regional MDS consultant explained that she and other MDS nurses from sister facilities were assisting to open MDS assessments and complete them during the time the facility MDS consultant was on leave, but the other facilities started having COVID-19 outbreaks and the priority shifted for those MDS nurses. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:15 PM. The Administrator reported the facility MDS nurse had been on leave for most of December 2021 and half of January 2022. The Administrator reported the MDS nurses who were helping with the MDS assessments at the facility had outbreaks in their facilities and were unable to assist with the timely completion of MDS, CAA, and care plans.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan withi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to address the immediate needs of a resident for enteral feedings or identify the correct smoking status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #27). The findings included: Resident #27 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27's diagnoses included dysphagia and history of laryngeal cancer. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/15/21 indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. A review of the physician orders indicated Resident #27 was ordered enteral feeding every 4 hours, 240 cubic centimeters (cc) with a start date of 10/08/21. Review of the Medication Administration Record indicated Resident #27 received the tube feeding as ordered on 10/08/21 from 10/08/21 until 12/07/21. A smoking assessment was completed on 10/08/21 for Resident #27. The resident was assessed as being a safe smoker, not requiring supervision. The Baseline care plan completed on 10/11/21 indicated Resident #27 was NPO (Nothing by Mouth). The box for tube feeding was not checked. The question Is this resident a smoker? was checked no on Resident #27's baseline care plan. It was signed with a date of 10/11/21. An observation was conducted of Resident #27 on 01/26/22 in the smoking area and he was smoking a cigarette. An interview completed with Resident #27 was done on 01/25/22 at 10:10 AM. He stated he had a feeding tube in place, was gaining weight and was hoping to be able to eat enough to not require the enteral feeding. Resident stated he was a smoker. An interview was done on 01/27/22 at 04:03 PM with the Unit Manager (UM)/Former Interim Director of Nursing. She stated the baseline care plan (BCP) pulled information from the initial admission assessment and should have included smoking, enteral tubes and tube feedings. She noted the BCP should be done within 48 hours including weekends and be accurate. She noted it should be reviewed with the Resident/Responsible Party (RP) and if the RP was not available the evening supervisor would call and review it with them.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise a nutrition care plan for 1 of 1 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise a nutrition care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident #27). Findings include: Resident #27 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #27's diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD), diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dysphagia and history of laryngeal cancer. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/15/21 indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. It was noted he had no swallowing disorder. Record review of a swallowing study completed on 10/27/21 indicated Resident #27 was recommended minced and moist solid food, mildly thickened liquids and medication to be whole in puree or applesauce. A physician order for Resident #27 for a regular diet, mechanical soft texture and nectar thickened fluids was ordered on 10/29/21. Record Review of Resident #27's care plan indicated the resident was NPO. This intervention was initiated on 08/30/21 and revised on 10/28/21. The Dietitian Progress note dated 1/10/22 revealed Resident #27 was receiving enteral feedings and was continued on a mechanical soft diet with thickened liquids. The care plan for Resident #27 was reviewed on 1/26/22 the NPO status was on the care plan and no information regarding thickened liquids was listed. An interview was done on 01/28/22 at 12:26 PM with MDS Nurse #1 regarding Resident #27's admission assessment. She stated MDS staff were responsible to update the care plans. MDS nurse #1 was asked about the NPO (Nothing by Mouth) status on the care plan and stated she thought she had removed it. She noted he was NPO on admission, the meals had been added a while ago, and he was no longer NPO. She noted the care plan should have been updated with his new diet information. A follow up interview with MDS Nurse #1 completed on 01/28/22 was done and she provided a copy of an Order Audit Report which indicated the NPO order had been discontinued on 10/29/21 when the resident was upgraded to a mechanical soft diet. She noted the care plan should have revised. An interview was done on 01/27/22 at 04:03 PM with the Unit Manager (UM)/Former Interim Director of Nursing. She stated the MDS nurse was responsible to update the care plans. The UM noted the MDS nurse reviewed the orders and received information in the morning meetings to revise/update the care plan as needed. She noted nursing did not update the care plan The UM added Speech Therapy usually completed the written order for diet change modifications and the MDS nurse should have updated the care plan with the order change. A phone interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/01/22 at 2:10 PM regarding care plans. She stated new orders and resident updates were done in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings. She noted normally the MDS nurse did the care plan updates but she had updated care plans and usually care plans were updated during the IDT meetings Monday-Friday.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview of the staff, residents, and family member, the facility failed to provide inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview of the staff, residents, and family member, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to residents who were dependent for activities of daily living for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #4, 5, and 374). Findings included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of other neurological condition. Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented an intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for transfer, bathing, and dressing. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #4's care plan dated 1/23/22 documented the resident was non-ambulatory and leans to the side frequently. The resident required assistance with her activities of daily living. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder with an overactive bladder and was dependent on staff for incontinence care. The resident was at risk for urinary tract infection. Interventions included: Check for incontinent episodes during care rounds and as required for incontinence and change clothing as needed after incontinence episodes. On 1/24/22 at 5:15 pm an interview was conducted with Resident #4's family member. The family member stated that she had visited on several occasions and found the resident wet with urine and urine odor. When the family member placed the call light on or asked staff, they would not respond for a long time (over an hour). A review of the documented nurse staffing for 1/26/22 revealed there were three nursing assistants assigned for day shift. On 01/26/22 at 11:00 am incontinence care was observed for Resident #4. The resident was urine soaked through her undergarment, incontinence pad, and sheet to the mattress. The bed was observed to be wet from side to side and up the resident's back. Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 turned the resident and bowel movement was found. The NA washed the resident's back as well as incontinence care. Urine odor was very strong. On 1/26/22 at 11:20 am an interview was conducted with NA #1. She stated Resident #4 had not received incontinence or morning care this day shift (7 am to 3 pm) 1/26/22 until 11:00 am. She stated that there was not enough staff. She had 16 residents for her day shift assignment today and there were only 3 NAs on this shift. NA stated 11:00 am was the first time she was able to provide incontinence care for Resident #4 due to staffing and her assignment. NA #1 stated she usually provided care every 2 hours but had too many residents to care for. NA #1 stated that management were aware of the assignment, inability to complete assignment was not reported. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/27/22 at 9:30 am. The DON stated she was not aware of NA #1's inability to provide incontinence care every 2 hours. The DON stated that staff were pulled to move 5 COVID positive residents into a COVID unit that was being put together at the same time. The DON stated she was aware of the staffing assignment and that there were less nursing available for resident care during this time. 2. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of dementia. Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented she was severely cognitively impaired. She was activity of daily living (ADL) dependent. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #5's care plan dated 10/18/21 documented she had an ADL self-care performance deficit from right-sided hemiplegia and generalized weakness. She was dependent on staff for all her self-care needs. The goal was the resident's self-care needs will be anticipated and met by staff daily. Interventions included: one staff to bath, dress, and groom resident daily and as needed. On 1/25/22 at 10:10 am an observation was done of Resident #5. She was lying in her bed. There was urine odor and a small to moderate amount of yellow colored liquid on the incontinence pad and resident's clothing. On 1/26/22 at 11:45 am Resident #5 was observed in her bed. She had a noticeable wet yellow ring around the torso and buttocks of her body on the incontinence pad and sheet with urine odor. Nursing Assistant (NA) #2 was assisting the roommate (Resident #374) with incontinence care. On 1/26/22 at 11:50 am an interview was conducted with NA #2. She stated that she was not sure the last time Resident #5 had received incontinence care. She was assigned to this resident room for day shift (7 am to 3 pm). She had no comment regarding the NA assignment for day shift. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/27/22 at 9:30 am. The DON stated she was not aware of NA #2's inability to provide incontinence care every 2 hours. The DON stated that staff were pulled to move 5 COVID positive residents into a COVID unit that was being put together at the same time. The DON stated she was aware of the staffing assignment and that there were less nursing available for resident care during this time. 3. Resident #374 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of altered mental status and kidney failure. Resident #374's care plan dated 12/16/21 documented the resident required assistance with her activities of daily living. On 1/26/22 at 11:00 am an observation and interview were done of Resident #374. NA #2 changed the resident for incontinence of urine and stool. The bed, pad, and sheet were noted to be very wet with yellow liquid and urine odor was noted. The NA reported she did not know when the last incontinence change had taken place. I was asked to provide care by the nurse because the tube feed had leaked in the bed. Stool was large and the linen was wet. Urine odor was noted. The NA used four changes of gloves to complete incontinence care and changed all linens due to the level of soiling. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/27/22 at 9:30 am. The DON stated she was not aware of NA #2's inability to provide incontinence care every 2 hours. The DON stated that nursing staff were pulled to move 5 COVID positive residents into a COVID unit that was being put together at the same time. The DON stated that she was informed by NA #2 tube feeding had leaked into Resident #374's bed on 1/26/22 when incontinence care was observed. NA #2 was assigned to the resident's room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review and interview of with the staff and residents and physician, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of dependent residents for in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview of with the staff and residents and physician, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of dependent residents for incontinence care. (Resident #'s 4, 5, and 374) for 3 of 8 residents sampled. The findings included: Cross referred: F677: Based on observation, record review and interview of the staff, residents, and family member, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to residents that were dependent for activities of daily living for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #'s 4, 5, and 374). On 1/26/22 at 11:00 am an observation was done of NA #1 provide incontinence care. The NA was having difficulty turning Resident #4 alone and stopped to go get assistance. The NA returned and stated there was no help at this time. The NA turned the resident to the other side and had the resident hold the side rail to wash her back. The resident commented there was never any help. On 1/26/22 11:55 am an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. He stated that he was aware there was a nursing staff shortage. He came to the facility during inclement weather on the weekend to assist with passing meal trays and other assistance as needed due to a lack of nursing staff. On 1/26/22 at 3:15 pm an interview was conducted with the facility physician. He was aware that there was a nursing shortage, and that management was providing care. He stated that there was a nursing shortage all over (other facilities). On 1/26/22 at 3:00 pm an interview was conducted with Nurse #1. She stated that there was a nursing staff shortage. Today on day shift there were 3 NAs working and the total should be 8 for days, 6 for evenings, and 4 for nights. On 1/27/22 at 5:00 pm an interview was conducted with the Administrator and DON. The Administrator stated that because of the COVID outbreak on Wednesday 1/26/22, nursing staff were pulled to create a COVID unit and staff moved COVID positive residents and their belongings to the unit. The Administrator stated the incontinence care delay provided to residents was isolated. The Administrator stated that 5 residents tested positive on Wednesday, and she already had staff out who tested positive for COVID last week. The Administrator stated this was a crisis, and she had the option to use COVID positive staff that received the COVID vaccine and were asymptomatic but decided not to use that staff because she felt it could make matters worse. The Administrator stated that her emergency plan was to use a nurse agency for staffing shortage but there was limited availability during the COVID increase. DON stated, there just wasn't any staff.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve chicken pot pie in the portion required by the menu to 11 of 11 residents observed. (Residents #5, 15, 18, 35, 5...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve chicken pot pie in the portion required by the menu to 11 of 11 residents observed. (Residents #5, 15, 18, 35, 58, 60, 64, 70, 71, 175 and 176). This deficient practice had the potential to affect other residents. The findings included: An observation of the lunch meal tray line occurred on 01/27/22 at 12:10 PM. [NAME] #1 was observed plating chicken pot pie using a #8 (4 ounce) utensil to 3 residents. Four plates with chicken pot pie for residents were observed on the top of the steam table, plates were covered by dietary staff and placed in an insulated delivery cart. There were four plates for residents observed already in the insulated delivery cart. The lunch meal tray tickets revealed chicken pot pie was to be served in a portion recorded as 1 each to residents. Interview with [NAME] #1 at the time of the observation revealed she had already plated chicken pot pie for delivery to 11 residents. [NAME] #1 stated she was not sure what a serving of 1 each was equivalent to and stated, Since the tray ticket just says one each, I just used a regular serving scoop. [NAME] #1 verified that the serving utensil she used was a 4-ounce utensil and stated that she did not ask her manager for clarification regarding the portion of chicken pot pie to serve. Review of the recipe, Chicken Pot Pie, revealed the recipe was to be portioned evenly into 12 inches, by 20 inches by 4 inches pans for 30 portions per pan. The recipe yield was 65 total servings, and the portion size was recorded as 30 servings of 2 inches by 4 inches per full pan. Review of the recipe revealed the total ingredients would yield approximately 485 ounces and 65 portions would yield approximately 7.46 ounces each. The pan used by [NAME] #1 to portion the chicken pot pie into was measured as 2.5 inches in depth. An interview with the certified dietary manager (CDM) occurred on 01/27/22 at 12:10 PM and revealed he was not aware of the serving utensil [NAME] #1 used to serve the chicken pot pie. The CDM reviewed the recipe during the interview and stated the recipe recorded the serving size as a 2 inch by 4 inch serving and that each pan should yield approximately 30 servings. He stated he did not notice that the chicken pot pie recipe recorded a pan that was 4 inches in depth as the correct size pan to use. The CDM further stated that he would expect the cook to use the correct size pan and to cut the chicken pot pie into 2 inches by 4-inch portions per the instructions to ensure each resident received the correct portion of vegetables and meat. A follow up interview occurred on 01/27/22 at 1:36 PM with [NAME] #1. The interview revealed [NAME] #1 added diced frozen chicken to canned mixed vegetables. Then [NAME] #2 added the cream of chicken soup to the chicken mixture, layered the pan with a crust, poured the chicken mixture over the bottom crust and then topped the pot pie with another crust. [NAME] #1 stated she divided the mixture between 2 pans that were 2.5 inches deep and placed the pot pies into the oven to bake. [NAME] #1 stated she did not notice that the recipe required use of a pan that was 4 inches in depth. She stated that she did not refer to the recipe when she prepared the chicken pot pie because [NAME] #2 helped her to prepare the recipe. An interview with [NAME] #2 (lead cook) occurred on 01/27/22 at 01:40 PM. [NAME] #2 stated she helped [NAME] #1 prepare the chicken pot pies, but that she did not review the recipe. [NAME] #2 stated she had prepared the chicken pot pie recipe many times and that she was familiar with how to prepare it. [NAME] #2 stated she layered each pan of chicken pot pie with a bottom crust, added cream of chicken soup to the chicken mixture, [NAME] #1 added the chicken mixture to the pans and then [NAME] #2 topped each pot pie with a crust. [NAME] #2 stated she added the additional bottom crust to make the recipe better. The consultant registered dietitian (RD) was interviewed by phone on 1/27/22 at 2:40 PM. The RD stated in interview that she provided clinical support to the facility and that the CDM also had a corporate RD for contact. The RD stated in interview that casseroles that provided both a vegetable and a protein were typically served in a 6-ounce portion. The RD stated that she would expect the residents to receive a portion of chicken pot pie according to the menu. The RD also stated that if the [NAME] did not use the correct size pan but put the whole recipe into one pan and the yield was 30 portions, the residents would have received a correct portion, but if the [NAME] divided the recipe and used the wrong size pan, the portion size would have to be adjusted to ensure each resident received a 4 ounce portion of vegetable and 2 ounce portion of meat. The administrator was interviewed on 01/27/22 at 03:50 PM and reviewed the chicken pot pie recipe during the interview. The administrator stated she expected dietary staff to follow the recipe, use the correct size pan and serve the portion per the recipe to get the correct yield and to give residents the correct portion.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to 1) thaw a potentially hazardous food with an effective food safety system, and 2) store cold/frozen foods sealed and w...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to 1) thaw a potentially hazardous food with an effective food safety system, and 2) store cold/frozen foods sealed and with a label and date of opening. The facility thawed frozen diced ham, that was not submerged, under running water with a temperature of 93.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility stored hot dogs, sliced ham, sliced turkey, French fries, pancakes, sliced cheese and chicken tenders without a label and date of opening and open to air. This failure occurred in 2 of 3 cold storage units and had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: 1. An observation occurred on 01/27/22 at 12:10 PM of a sealed plastic bag of frozen diced ham stored in a large pot filled with water. Both the cold and hot water faucets were turned on with water running into the pot. The top portion of the bag of ham was not submerged in the water. Review of the menu for 01/27/22 at 12:11 PM revealed ham and potato casserole was to be served for the dinner meal. Temperature monitoring on 01/27/22 at 12:12 PM by the certified dietary manager (CDM) revealed the following: ·The water in the pot was 90.3 degrees F ·The running water was 93.4 degrees F ·The diced ham was 27.4 degrees F During an interview on 01/27/22 at 12:15 PM the CDM stated he did not know who set up the pot of running water to thaw the diced ham. Cook #1 (morning cook) was interviewed on 01/27/22 at 12:16 PM and stated she observed the CDM set up the pot of running water to thaw the diced ham. The CDM stated in a follow up interview on 01/27/22 at 12:17 PM that he wanted to clarify his previous interview. He stated that about 30 minutes ago, he put the plastic bag of diced frozen ham in a pot to thaw and turned on the cold water. He stated he could not explain why the hot water faucet was also turned on. The CDM stated that he was trying to thaw the frozen ham in time to use it to prepare the ham and potato casserole that would be served for the dinner meal. The CDM further stated that the frozen ham should have been submerged in cold water with water at least 70 degrees F, running into the pot. An interview with the administrator on 01/27/22 at 3:50 PM revealed she expected dietary staff to thaw frozen meats using a safe thawing method. 2a. The walk-in refrigerator was observed on 01/24/22 at 11:20 AM with the following: ·An opened plastic bag of hot dogs stored without a label to record the open date ·An opened plastic container of deli ham stored without a label to record the open date ·An opened plastic container of sliced turkey stored without a label to record the open date 2b. The freezer was observed on 01/24/22 at 11:35 AM with the following: ·A bag of French fries was stored open to air and without a label to record the open date ·A plastic bag of pancakes with an open date of 01/14/22 was stored open to air ·A bag of chicken tenders was stored open to air and without a label to record the open date 2c. The reach in refrigerator was observed on 01/24/22 at 11:40 with sliced American cheese with an open date of 01/19/22 stored open to air. An interview with [NAME] #2 occurred on 01/24/22 at 11:45 AM and revealed she stored items in the walk-in refrigerator and the freezer that she forgot to label before putting them away. An interview with the CDM on 01/24/22 at 11:46 AM revealed he expected staff to label foods after opening with the date opened and store all foods in sealed containers. He stated that dietary staff were expected to round daily prior to starting their shift to monitor refrigeration units for unlabeled, undated foods or foods stored open to air. He stated that it was the responsibility of the cooks to monitor refrigeration units and that he provided oversight. The CDM stated these items were missed when staff monitored cold storage that day. An interview with the administrator on 01/27/22 at 3:50 PM revealed she expected dietary staff to label, date and seal all foods before storage.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on 8/29//21. A smoking assessment was completed on 10/08/21 for Resident #27. The ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on 8/29//21. A smoking assessment was completed on 10/08/21 for Resident #27. The resident was assessed as being a safe smoker, not requiring supervision. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/15/21 indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. The assessment was coded as No that the resident did not have Current Tobacco Use. During the survey, the facility provided a list of current residents that smoked, and Resident #27 was included on the list. Observations were conducted of Resident #27 on 01/26/22 in the smoking area smoking a cigarette. An interview was done on 01/28/22 at 12:26 PM with MDS nurse #1 regarding Resident #27's admission assessment. She stated the 09/04/21 admission MDS was coded incorrectly for Current Tobacco User and should have been a Yes. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 01/28/22 at 4:49 PM regarding MDS assessments. She stated she expected the MDS assessments to be coded accurately. 4. Resident #328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission skin assessment for Resident #328 completed on 07/21/21 revealed no skin breakdown on heels. The Nurse Progress Note dated 07/25/21 revealed Resident #328 was complaining of right foot pain, the sock was removed and noted a 2.5 centimeter (cm) x 3.0 cm open blister to her right heel. The Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not code a pressure ulcer. MDS Nurse #1 was interviewed on 01/28/22 at 11:57 AM regarding Resident #328's MDS discharge assessment. She was asked about the pressure ulcer not being coded and stated she had reviewed the nurse's notes and only saw an open blister on the nurse's notes and not anything additional when she did the discharge MDS. She was asked about the Nurse Practitioner's note from 07/26/21 that indicated a pressure ulcer had developed and the MDS nurse stated the note was not uploaded when she completed the assessment on 08/03/21. The care plan was reviewed with the MDS nurse and reviewed the revision date of 07/26/21 for the entry that indicated a pressure ulcer area to right heel and to continue treatment until healed. She stated these were entered by MDS Nurse #2. MDS Nurse #1 stated she was unable to accurately code the discharge MDS assessment when information from 07/26/21 was not uploaded until 08/07/21 after the discharge assessment was completed. She stated they talked about pressure ulcers in the morning meetings but without information in the medical record she cannot code it. An interview was completed with the Administrator on 01/28/22 at 4:49 PM regarding the Discharge MDS assessment for Resident #328. She stated she would want the MDS assessment to match the resident accurately and the pressure ulcer should have been included. She noted she would have expected the MDS nurses to hear the report in the morning meetings and enter it in the MDS. The Administrator also noted there was a file for residents in Medical Records with information to be uploaded that was available to the MDS staff. Based on record reviews, staff interviews, resident interviews, and observations the facility failed to correctly code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the areas of infection, and brief interview for mental status (BIMS) (Resident # 20), dental (Resident #59) and smoking (Resident #27) for 3 of 26 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The Findings included: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. a. A review of the previous MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #20 as being severely cognitively impaired. The annual assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident as being cognitively intact. b. Resident #20 quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 was coded as being cognitively intact and had been assessed as having pneumonia. A record review revealed Resident #20 had a urinary tract infection as of 12/21/21 and was started on antibiotic therapy on 12/21/21. There was no documentation in the record review that Resident #20 had pneumonia during the lookback period. A phone interview was completed with the MDS nurse on 1/27/22 at 4:59 PM who stated that she meant to code UTI and coded pneumonia instead. The MDS nurse stated she knew Resident #20 had an infection and clicked the wrong buttons and it was an oversite. The MDS nurse was asked about Resident #20's cognition score on the quarterly 10/22/21 assessment and she stated the former Social Worker filled out section C. The MDS nurse stated that Resident #20 was cognitively intact and to code Resident #20 as severely cognitively impaired was not accurate. A phone interview was completed with the former Social Worker (SW) on 1/31/22 at 4:27 PM regarding Resident #20's cognition score on the quarterly assessment on 10/22/21. The former SW stated that it was a mistake and inputted the data wrong. She stated that she knew the resident well and her memory was intact. The former SW stated that she was probably rushing and had just learned the software. 2. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of ulcerated colitis and delirium. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] section L oral dental status coded Resident #59 as having no natural teeth or teeth fragments. An observation and interview of Resident #59 on 1/24/22 at 10:52 AM revealed she had teeth. Resident stated that she had saw a dentist to clean her teeth a couple of months ago. A record review showed Resident #59 had her teeth cleaned by a hygienist on 12/15/21. A phone interview was completed with the MDS nurse on 1/27/22 at 4:51 PM who stated she had made a mistake by coding Resident #59 as having no teeth, and she did Resident #59's admission assessment and knew Resident #59 well and this was an oversite. An interview was completed with the Administrator on 1/28/22 at 4:49 PM who stated that it would be her expectation the MDS matches the resident accurately.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold policy upon transfer to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold policy upon transfer to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Residents #70 and #27). Findings included: 1. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #70 to be moderately cognitively impaired. A nurse practitioner (NP) note dated 12/29/2021 documented Resident #70 had been discharged from the facility on 11/28/2021 and admitted to the hospital with pulmonary vascular congestion and to receive in-patient dialysis. Resident #70 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #70's medical record revealed no documented evidence a written bed hold policy had been provided to Resident #70 upon discharge to the hospital. Nurse #2 was interviewed on 1/26/2022 at 8:33 PM. Nurse #2 reported she sent a medication administration record and resident demographics with a resident when they were sent to the hospital. Nurse #2 reported she was not certain if a bed hold policy was given to a resident when they transferred to the hospital. Nurse #3 was interviewed on 1/26/2022 at 8:48 PM. Nurse #3 reported she was the afternoon shift charge nurse. Nurse #3 reported when a resident was transferred to the hospital, a medication administration record and resident demographic sheet was sent with them. Nurse #3 reported a bed hold policy was not included. The admission Coordinator (AC) was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:07 PM. The AC reported a bed hold policy was included in an admission packet, but when a resident was transferred to hospital, they did not receive a second copy of the bed hold policy. The AC explained she called the resident or the resident representative and explained the bed hold policy and inquired if the resident or representative wanted to sign the bed hold to ensure a bed was available for the resident ' s return. The AC reported the facility did not send a copy of the bed hold policy when any resident was transferred to the hospital. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:15 PM. The Administrator reported the AC called residents or resident representatives after a resident was transferred to the hospital to explain the bed hold policy and a bed hold form was not sent with the resident. 2. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #27 to be cognitively intact. Nurse #2 was interviewed on 1/26/2022 at 8:33 PM. Nurse #2 reported she sent a medication administration record and resident demographics with a resident when they were sent to the hospital. Nurse #2 reported she was not certain if a bed hold policy was given to a resident when they transferred to the hospital. Nurse #3 was interviewed on 1/26/2022 at 8:48 PM. Nurse #3 reported she was the afternoon shift charge nurse. Nurse #3 reported when a resident was transferred to the hospital, a medication administration record and resident demographic sheet was sent with them. Nurse #3 reported a bed hold policy was not included. A nursing note dated 1/27/2022 documented Resident #27 had weakness and a low blood oxygen saturation, and he was transferred to the hospital. As of 2/1/2022, Resident #27 remained hospitalized . A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed no documented evidence a written bed hold policy had been provided to Resident #27 upon discharge to the hospital. The admission Coordinator (AC) was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:07 PM. The AC reported a bed hold policy was included in an admission packet, but when a resident was transferred to hospital, they did not receive a second copy of the bed hold policy. The AC explained she called the resident or the resident representative and explained the bed hold policy and inquired if the resident or representative wanted to sign the bed hold to ensure a bed was available for the resident ' s return. The AC reported the facility did not send a copy of the bed hold policy when any resident was transferred to the hospital. The Administrator was interviewed on 1/28/2022 at 2:15 PM. The Administrator reported the AC called residents or resident representatives after a resident was transferred to the hospital to explain the bed hold policy and a bed hold form was not sent with the resident.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 5 of 7 posted daily staffing forms ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 5 of 7 posted daily staffing forms reviewed. Findings included: Daily staffing forms for 11/22/2021, 11/23/2021, 12/29/2021, 12/30/2021, 12/31/2021, 1/4/2022, and 1/5/2022 were reviewed and revealed the following were not accurate on 5 of 7 dates: a. The nurse schedule for 11/22/2021 had 4 nursing assistants (NA) scheduled to work the afternoon shift (3:00 PM to 11:00 PM). The posted daily staffing form indicated 6 NAs provided 38 hours of care on that date. The nurse schedule for night shift (11:00 PM to 7:00 AM) had 4 NAs scheduled to work that date. The posted daily staffing form indicated 6 NAs had provided 38 hours of care on 11/22/2021 during night shift. b. The nurse schedule for 12/29/2021 had 9 NAs scheduled to work the day shift (7:00 AM to 3:00 PM). The posted daily staffing form indicated 10 NAs had provided 75 hours of care on that date. The nurse schedule for afternoon shift on 12/29/2021 had 7.5 NAs scheduled to work afternoon shift. The posted daily staffing form indicated 8 NAs had provided 60 hours of care that shift. c. The nurse schedule for 12/30/2021 afternoon shift had 5.5 NAs scheduled to work. The posted daily staffing form indicated 6 NAs had provided 41 hours of care that shift. The nurse schedule for 12/30/2021 did not have a Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled to work night shift on 12/30/2021. The posted daily staffing form indicated 1 RN provided 8 hours of care that shift. d. The nurse schedule for 12/31/2021 had 2.5 RNs scheduled to work the day shift. The posted daily staffing form indicated that 2 RNs had provided 16 hours of care. The nursing schedule for evening shift on 12/31/2021 had 1.5 NAs scheduled to work. The posted daily staffing form indicated 2 NAs had provided 11.5 hours of care. e. The nurse schedule for 1/5/2022 had 1.5 RNs scheduled to work. The daily posted staffing form indicated 1 RN had provided 8 hours of care. The nurse schedule had 5 NAs scheduled to work afternoon shift. The posted daily staffing form indicated 6 NAs had provided 37 hours of care that shift. The nurse schedule for night shift on 1/5/2022 had 5 NAs scheduled to work. The posted daily staffing form indicated 6 NAs had provided 45 hours of care that shift. The facility scheduler was interviewed on 1/27/2022 at 12:30 PM. The scheduler reported she was correcting posted daily staffing forms during the day shift and afternoon shift. The scheduler explained that the front desk receptionist worked until 8:00 PM and she would make corrections in the evening. The scheduler reported the facility was using agency staff to fill open positions for all three shifts. The scheduler explained a phone app was used by the agency staff to pick up shifts, and if the agency staff used the app to call out sick, the facility was not notified of the absence. The scheduler reported when a call out happened, either she or the receptionist would modify the posted daily staffing form. The scheduler concluded by explaining the weekend supervisor worked from 11:00 AM to 11:00 PM and she was not aware the RN should have her hours credited on both day and afternoon shifts. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 1/28/2021 at 11:54 AM. The DON reported the posted daily staffing form should be updated by the scheduler, the receptionist, the DON, or the charge nurse on afternoon and night shifts. The DON reported she expected the posted daily staffing form to accurately reflect the staffing of licensed and unlicensed staff working in the facility for each day.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 6 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $129,204 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 29 deficiencies on record, including 6 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $129,204 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in North Carolina. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Accordius Health At Concord's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Accordius Health at Concord an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Accordius Health At Concord Staffed?

CMS rates Accordius Health at Concord's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 67%, which is 20 percentage points above the North Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Accordius Health At Concord?

State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at Accordius Health at Concord during 2022 to 2024. These included: 6 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 18 with potential for harm, and 4 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Accordius Health At Concord?

Accordius Health at Concord is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 100 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Concord, North Carolina.

How Does Accordius Health At Concord Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Accordius Health at Concord's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (67%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Accordius Health At Concord?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Accordius Health At Concord Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Accordius Health at Concord has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Accordius Health At Concord Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Accordius Health at Concord is high. At 67%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the North Carolina average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Accordius Health At Concord Ever Fined?

Accordius Health at Concord has been fined $129,204 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.8x the North Carolina average of $34,371. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Accordius Health At Concord on Any Federal Watch List?

Accordius Health at Concord is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.