Glenflora

5701 Fayetteville Road, Lumberton, NC 28360 (704) 603-2939
Non profit - Other 52 Beds LUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
76/100
#33 of 417 in NC
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Glenflora in Lumberton, North Carolina, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families seeking care, as it falls within the solid range of performance. In the state, it ranks #33 out of 417 facilities, placing it in the top half, and is the top facility among 6 in Robeson County. The facility is showing improvement, having reduced its reported issues from 2 in 2023 to none in 2024. Staffing is rated at 4 out of 5 stars, which is a strength, although the turnover rate of 53% is average for the state. However, there are some concerns, including a serious incident where a resident suffered multiple fractures due to improper transfer protocols, highlighting the need for greater attention to safety procedures. Additionally, there were concerns about expired medications not being removed from the inventory and incomplete hospice documentation, which suggest areas for improvement.

Trust Score
B
76/100
In North Carolina
#33/417
Top 7%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$14,689 in fines. Lower than most North Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for North Carolina. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 53%

Near North Carolina avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $14,689

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: LUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Dec 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, staff and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer when the Tra...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, staff and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer when the Transportation Aide did not ensure a resident's lower extremities were raised during a transfer onto the wheelchair lift platform of the facility van for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). During a facility van transport on 10/31/23, Resident #1 was assisted onto the wheelchair lift platform by the facility Transportation Aide when she fell forward from the wheelchair resulting in a laceration to the head, fractures of cervical (neck) 1 and 2 vertebrae, fractures of the right tibia and fibula (bones of the lower leg), and fracture of the femur (hip). Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment and required transfer via life flight to a second hospital on [DATE] for acute trauma care. Resident #1 had surgical closure of the laceration of the scalp and repair of the open fractures of the tibia and fibula. She demonstrated decline in her overall condition with decreased cognition and ability to swallow necessitating feeding tube placement while hospitalized . She was transferred to an inpatient hospice on 11/9/23 where she passed away on 11/10/23 with cause of death listed as complications of multiple blunt force injuries. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, in part: history of stroke with ataxia (impaired balance and coordination), muscle weakness and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed a 6/23/23 focus of at risk for falls related to confusion, gait, and balance problems and unaware of safety needs. The goal indicated Resident #1 would be free of falls resulting in major injury. The mobility interventions indicated Resident #1 used a wheelchair for locomotion, required supportive care and assistance with mobility, and staff were to anticipate and meet resident's needs. Review of Resident #1's 9/18/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated resident was cognitively intact and demonstrated no behaviors. Resident #1 required extensive assistance with transfers, had impaired balance and required a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the 10/30/23 physical therapy progress note indicated Resident #1 had significant impairments in the bilateral lower extremities and core strength, transfers, functional mobility, and was at risk for falls. An interview was conducted on the facility van on 11/28/23 at 1:40 PM with the Transportation Aide with the Administrator present. Observation of the facility van revealed a wheelchair accessible van with the wheelchair lift mechanism on the side. The wheelchair lift mechanism included a threshold plate which bridged the gap between the lift platform and the vehicle floor and the metal grating surface upon which the wheelchair was positioned for entering and exiting the van. The floor of the interior of the van had a rubberized flooring material. The Transportation Aide stated when offloading a resident from the van, with the lift platform level with the vehicle floor in the fully raised position he backed the wheelchair up and then turned the chair to the right pushing the chair forward onto the lift platform located on the side of the van. The outer end of the lift platform had a metal raised outboard roll stop barrier that must be in place prior to lowering the lift platform to the ground. The Transportation Aide stated he stood on the lift platform behind the wheelchair as he lowered the lift platform to the ground. The Transportation Aide stated on 10/31/23 he had Resident #1 in her wheelchair and had turned the chair to the right and was attempting to get her wheelchair onto the lift platform. The Transportation Aide stated he was rolling the chair forward onto the lift platform when Resident #1 put both her feet down and tilted forward and she hit the corner of the metal outboard stop barrier at the end of the lift and went down on her knees. The Transportation Aide stated he lowered the lift platform down to the ground level and went to the therapy room to call for assistance. The Transportation Aide revealed he was trained in the use of the wheelchair van lift when the facility obtained the van about 12 or 13 years ago. The Transportation Aide stated he was trained that according to the lift manufacturer instructions he could position the resident in the wheelchair facing outboard (toward the outside of the van) or inboard (toward the interior of the van) when he raised and lowered the lift platform for entering and exiting the vehicle. On 11/29/23 at 9:30 AM a reenactment of the incident on 10/31/23 involving Resident #1 was completed with the Transportation Aide on the facility van using a standard wheelchair without leg rests. The Administrator was present for the reenactment. The reenactment also included an interview with the Transportation Aide for clarification of the information presented. The reenactment began as the Transportation Aide raised the wheelchair lift platform (located on the side of the vehicle) to the high position flush with the floor of the vehicle. The Transportation Aide then demonstrated that on 10/31/23, Resident #1 was sitting in the wheelchair without leg rests present when he released the locking hooks and lap/shoulder strap, unlocked her wheelchair brakes, and backed her wheelchair up to the back of the van in preparation to turn the wheelchair to the right to proceed to the lift platform. The Transportation Aide stated Resident #1 had her legs straight out in front of her initially. The Transportation Aide demonstrated that he then turned her wheelchair to the right and began pushing the wheelchair forward toward the lift platform. At this time, the Transportation Aide noted Resident #1 no longer had her legs straight out in front of her. The Transportation Aide indicated he did not provide Resident #1 with verbal instructions to lift her feet or to hold her feet up as he was pushing her wheelchair and getting her onto the lift platform. The Transportation Aide indicated Resident #1 had been on the transport van multiple times before, and he thought she knew what he was doing and what was required of her. The Administrator interjected that there was no need to provide instructions to Resident #1 regarding keeping her feet elevated when being moved in the wheelchair as she initially lifted her feet and she had been transported on the van many times previously. The Transportation Aide further stated he did not always provide instructions to the residents regarding the procedure of getting onto the lift platform or keeping their feet up. The Transportation Aide stated that he provided instructions regarding the procedure of being moved in the wheelchair onto the lift platform to the residents on an as needed basis. The Transportation Aide indicated he was not rushed or in a hurry when he was getting Resident #1 off the van. He explained that he had another transport scheduled for later that day and there were no other residents on the van with Resident #1. The Transportation Aide demonstrated he was behind Resident #1's wheelchair pushing her onto the lift platform as she put her feet down causing the wheelchair to stop. The Transportation Aide indicated Resident #1 went forward out of the wheelchair hitting her head on the left corner of the raised edge at the end of the lift platform and landing on her knees. The Transportation Aide demonstrated Resident #1 laying on the lift platform with her head at the outside end and her feet towards the van. The Transportation Aide demonstrated he stepped onto the lift platform with Resident #1 lying on the platform, lowered the platform to the ground and quickly went to the entrance of the building to summon help. The Transportation Aide indicated he did not move the resident and that the nurses and nursing assistants quickly responded and began administering first aid. An interview was conducted on 11/28/23 at 2:40 PM with the MDS Nurse. The MDS Nurse stated she responded to the overhead page for nursing STAT (respond immediately, without delay) to therapy on 10/31/23. When she arrived, the facility van was outside the therapy room and the MDS Nurse stated she observed Resident #1 lying on her back on the lift platform with her head at the outside edge of the platform and her feet towards the inside of the van. The MDS Nurse stated Resident #1 was bleeding from the top of her head with a large amount of blood dripping onto the ground, had a large laceration and blood bruise to her right leg and was in a lot of pain. The MDS Nurse stated she was instructed by the Administrator to ask Resident #1 why she put her feet down. The MDS Nurse indicated Resident #1 responded she did not know how she fell. An interview on 11/28/23 at 2:09 PM with Nursing Assistant (NA) #2 revealed she was familiar with Resident #1's care as she was assigned to her regularly since she started working at the facility 3 months ago. NA #2 indicated Resident #1 was alert and oriented, required assistance with toileting and transfers and was able to put her feet up when instructed to do so when pushed in the wheelchair. NA #2 stated on 10/31/23 she responded to the overhead page for nursing stat to therapy. NA #2 stated she observed Resident #1 lying on her back on the lift platform with her head at the end of the platform and her feet towards the van. NA #2 stated Resident #1 was bleeding from her head and her knee and kept repeating her head was hurting. NA #2 stated she observed Resident #1 was in a lot of pain from her head and leg, so she tried to comfort her and keep her calm until Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived. An interview was conducted on 11/28/23 at 2:20 PM with the Unit Manager. The Unit Manager revealed she responded to the overhead page for nursing stat to therapy on 10/31/23 and observed Resident #1 lying on the lift platform with a large amount of bleeding from her head. The Unit Manager stated she went to obtain medical supplies, returned, and observed Resident #1 crying complaining of severe pain to her head and her right leg. The Unit Manager observed bleeding from Resident # 1's right leg. An interview was conducted with the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) nurse on 11/29/23 at 12:50 PM. The SDC nurse indicated she responded to the overhead page for nursing stat to therapy on the morning of 10/31/23. The SDC nurse indicated when she arrived at the area outside therapy, she observed Resident #1 lying on the lift platform with a significant amount of bleeding from her head and a laceration to her right leg. The SDC nurse stated Resident #1 was in a lot of pain. The SDC nurse indicated she assisted with emergency care to Resident #1 until EMS arrived. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/28/23 at 4:53 PM. The DON stated she responded to the overhead page for nursing stat to therapy on 10/31/23. The DON stated the other nurses were already providing emergency care to Resident #1's lacerations to the head and leg when she arrived outside to the wheelchair van. The DON stated she instructed Nurse #2 to call 911, obtain paperwork and notify the physician and the family. An interview was conducted with Nurse #2 on 11/29/23 at 1:00 PM. Nurse #2 stated she was familiar with Resident #1, was assigned to her care frequently and was assigned to her on 10/31/23 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift. Nurse #2 stated Resident #1 required assistance with mobility, had weakness in her legs and at times required reminders to lift her feet up during locomotion. Nurse #2 indicated on 10/31/23 she heard the overhead page for nursing stat to therapy and responded. Nurse #2 stated when she arrived, she observed Resident #1 lying on her back on the lift platform. Nurse #2 stated she was informed by a staff member, although she could not recall which one, that the Transportation Aide was pushing Resident #1 off the van when her legs dropped, and she tipped over. Nurse #2 stated she quickly left the scene of the incident called 911, prepared transfer paperwork and made phone calls. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed a transfer to the hospital form dated 10/31/23 at 4:00 PM was completed by the Director of Nursing (DON). The transfer form indicated Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital due to a fall resulting in a scalp laceration, right lower leg laceration and a laceration to the palm of the right hand. Review of a 10/31/23 nursing post fall progress note written by Nurse #2 at 4:28 PM indicated Resident #1 wearing shoes at the time of the fall. Review of the hospital #1 emergency department note on 10/31/23 revealed Resident #1 presented at 11:11 AM in a cervical collar with a v shaped laceration of the head and obvious deformity of the right shin with a laceration over the deformity after a fall from a wheelchair. X rays and Computerized Tomography (CT) scans were completed with the following results: CT of the cervical spine revealed a non-displaced fracture of cervical vertebra 1, type 2 Dens fracture (an unstable break of the second bone of the neck), CT scan of the head revealed a large superficial left sided soft tissue hematoma, x ray of the right tibia fibula revealed comminuted and displaced fractures of the tibia and fibula. The note indicated Resident #1 received intravenous fluids, intravenous antibiotic cefazolin 2 grams for open fractures, and narcotic fentanyl 50 micrograms intravenous for severe pain. The emergency department note indicated at 1:56 PM Resident #1 was transferred via life flight to hospital #2 for further management and the need for more advanced care. Review of the 11/9/23 discharge summary from hospital #2 revealed Resident presented on 10/31/23 at 2:51 PM as a trauma transfer from hospital #1. Resident #1 was unable to recall what happened. Resident #1 presented at hospital #2 with pain in her right lower leg, head, and neck and a blood pressure of 77/36. Resident #1 underwent surgical closure of the laceration of the scalp and repair of the open fractures of the tibia and fibula. The discharge summary indicated Resident #1 demonstrated decline in her overall condition with decreased cognition and ability to swallow necessitating feeding tube placement while hospitalized . Hospice was consulted and Resident #1's family opted for comfort care. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospice care center on 11/9/23 for end-of-life care. Resident #1's discharge diagnoses included cervical vertebra 1 and 2 fractures, right tibia and fibula fractures, left femur fracture, scalp laceration with acute blood loss anemia and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Review of a death certificate dated 11/10/23 revealed Resident #1 was pronounced dead on 11/10/23 at the inpatient hospice center with the cause of death listed as complications of multiple blunt force injuries sustained on 10/31/23 at the nursing facility. Review of a typed statement written and signed by the facility Administrator dated 11/27/23 revealed he heard an announcement for nursing stat to therapy over the overhead paging system on 10/31/23 around 10 AM. The statement indicated he walked to the therapy gym where the Unit Manager asked him to obtain towels which he did. The statement indicated he then walked back to the therapy gym and saw multiple staff members outside under the breezeway. When he walked outside, the statement indicated the Administrator saw the MDS Nurse providing care to Resident #1's head. The statement indicated the Administrator asked the Van Driver [Transportation Aide] what happened and was told Resident #1 put her feet down as the Van Driver [Transportation Aide] was pushing her onto the lift and she fell forward onto the lift. The statement indicated the Administrator instructed the MDS Nurse to ask Resident #1 Why did you put your feet down? Resident #1 replied to the MDS Nurse I don't know. The statement concluded staff stayed with Resident #1 until emergency medical services (EMS) arrived shortly after. During an interview with the Administrator on 11/29/23 at 2:15 PM he indicated the Transportation Aide reported the following when he (Administrator) interviewed him (Transportation Aide) about the 10/31/23 incident: he (Transportation Aide) observed Resident #1 with her legs lifted prior to moving the wheelchair, the resident put her feet down onto the lift platform, and he stopped pushing the wheelchair when she put her feet down. The Administrator stressed that instructions regarding keeping her feet up when the wheelchair was moved were not necessary as Resident #1 initially lifted her legs and had been on the facility wheelchair van in the past. The Administrator requested this surveyor re-interview the Transportation Aide to verify the events that occurred on 10/31/23 with Resident #1. A follow up interview was conducted with the Transportation Aide with the Administrator present on 11/29/23 at 2:20 PM. The 10/31/23 incident with Resident #1 that occurred on the facility van was again reviewed. The Transportation Aide reported the same information from the previous interviews and reenactment. The Transportation Aide stressed that he stopped pushing Resident #1 onto the lift platform when the resident put her feet down. An interview on 11/28/23 at 1:10 PM with NA #1 revealed she was assigned to Resident #1 on 10/31/23 on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift. NA #1 indicated on the morning of 10/31/23 she assisted Resident #1with her personal care prior to her leaving on the facility van for her doctor's appointment. NA #1 stated Resident #1 was normally alert, oriented, and able to follow directions. NA #1 stated Resident #1 had weakness in her lower extremities and required assistance with transfers and mobility using the wheelchair. NA #1 stated she instructed Resident #1 to hold her legs up when pushing her into the bathroom for toileting and she was able to do this. NA #1 stated Resident #1 did not normally use leg rests on her wheelchair. An interview on 11/28/23 at 11:30 AM with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) revealed she worked with Resident #1 frequently and was familiar with her care. The PTA indicated Resident #1 was alert, cooperative with care and able to follow directions. The PTA stated Resident #1 had weakness in both her lower legs, was fearful of falling and was working with therapy staff on transfers and wheelchair mobility. The PTA stated the resident required moderate assistance with transfers. An interview was conducted with the Physician via phone on 11/29/23 at 10:17 AM. The Physician stated he was familiar with Resident #1. The Physician stated Resident #1 was cognitively intact, however at her age, periods of forgetfulness could occur. The Physician stated residents can change what they do and how they do things daily. The Physician stated Resident #1 was alert, had weakness in her lower extremities and required a wheelchair at baseline. The Physician further indicated Resident #1 had diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia and at her age was at increased risk of fractures. The Physician indicated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, multiple fractures could occur from a fall on to a hard surface and could lead to terminal decline. An interview was conducted with the Payroll Specialist on 11/29/23 at 1:20 PM. The Payroll Specialist stated she transported residents to doctors' appointments using the facility wheelchair van at times. The Medical Records/Payroll Specialist indicated she was trained to operate the wheelchair lift but could not recall when she received training. The Payroll Specialist indicated when she offloaded a resident from the van, she explained the procedure, instructed the resident to keep their feet up off the floor and backed the wheelchair onto the lift platform. The Payroll Specialist explained she then locked the brakes of the wheelchair and lowered the lift platform to the ground. The Payroll Specialist indicated some residents had leg rests on their wheelchairs if they had weakness or were not able to keep their feet up off the ground. The Payroll Specialist indicated she received in service training following the incident on 10/31/23 regarding the procedure for loading and offloading residents from the van. The in-service training indicated to explain the procedure to the resident, instruct the resident to lift their feet off the floor and then proceed with assisting them onto the lift platform. The Payroll Specialist did not recall if she had transported Resident #1 on the facility van. An interview was conducted on 11/29/23 at 3:05 PM with the Activity Director. The Activity Director stated she transported residents to doctors' appointments and outings using the facility wheelchair accessible van. The Activity Director stated she was trained to operate the wheelchair lift but could not recall when the training occurred. The Activity Director stated wheelchair leg rests were used if the resident had any trouble lifting their legs. The Activity Director indicated when offloading a resident from the wheelchair van, she first explained the procedure including reminding the resident to lift their feet to move the wheelchair onto the lift platform. The Activity Director stated she slowly moved the resident backward onto the lift platform while observing their feet and arms for safety. The Activity Director stated she attended a recent in-service training regarding safe loading and offloading of residents on the wheelchair van including ensuring leg rests were on the wheelchair and instructing the resident on the procedure. The Activity Director did not recall if she had transported Resident #1 to an appointment or on an outing. An interview was conducted on 11/28/23 at 4:20 PM with the facility Administrator. The Administrator stated competencies and annual retraining of the Transportation Aide and other staff that transported residents in the facility wheelchair van were not completed since he was in the position of Administrator at the facility for the past 4 years. The Administrator stated the incident that occurred on 10/31/23 was discussed and a root cause was not determined. The Administrator further indicated the incident was used as an opportunity to provide education and conduct audits. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/29/23 at 1:35 PM. The facility provided the following corrective action plan with a completion date of 11/2/23. 1) Address how corrective action will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice: On 10/31/2023, the resident was immediately assessed by Hall Nurse and Minimum Data Set Nurse. The facility called 911 and the resident was taken to the hospital for further evaluation. The Administrator notified the resident's responsible party regarding the incident on 10/31/2023. 2) Address how the facility will identify other residents having the potential to be affected by the same deficient practice: All residents needing transportation services have the potential to be affected. It is the new practice that leg rests will be in place on all wheelchairs for vehicle transports. The Transportation Aide was observed by the Administrator on 10/31/23 for the last appointment of the day; the Transportation Aide ensured leg rests were applied to the wheelchair and the resident's legs were positioned on the leg rests while the wheelchair was moved. 3) Address what measures will be put into place or systemic changes made to ensure that the deficient practice will not recur: On 10/31/2023, the Director of Nursing immediately in-serviced the Transportation Aide on the process applying leg rests to wheelchairs prior to resident being transported to an appointment. All teammates who do transportation which includes the Transportation Aide, Activities Director, Payroll Specialist, Treatment Aide, and a 3rd shift Certified Nursing Assistant for residents were in serviced by the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 10/31/2023. The education on 10/31/2023 included the new procedure of ensuring leg rests are applied to resident's wheelchair prior to resident being transported to an appointment and ensuring resident's legs remain on leg rests while the wheelchair is being moved. The facility Driver will be responsible for ensuring leg rests are applied to the resident's wheelchair prior to completing any transportations. The Administrator was responsible for making sure teammates not in serviced on 10/31/23 were in serviced prior to completing any facility transportations. If the resident chooses not to have or refuses leg rests, the resident will be educated by the Director of Nursing on the benefit of using leg rests, and their preference will be care planned. The Facility Driver will notify the Director of Nursing if a resident refuses to have leg rests. If a resident refuses leg rests, the transportation will not occur. It is standard practice at our facility to notify the Director of Nursing any time a resident deviate from their care plan or facility policy. 4) Indicate how the facility plans to monitor its performance to make sure that solutions are sustained: The decision to conduct monitoring audits and decision to take to Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee were made on 11/1/2023. On 11/6/2023, the Administrator or Staff Development Coordinator began auditing 5 transports each week (if less than 5 scheduled, all will be observed at time resident loads onto or off the bus) ensuring leg rests are applied to the wheelchair. The audit also includes ensuring the resident's legs remain on the leg rests during loading or offloading while the wheelchair is being moved; after four weeks the audit will continue for 10 transports per month for a quarter. Any identified issues will be immediately corrected. The Administrator will present the findings of the audit to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee during the quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement meetings for the next two quarterly meetings. Alleged date of compliance: 11/2/2023 The corrective action plan was validated onsite on 12/04/23. Record review verified education was completed with staff who provide transportation related to the new procedure to ensure leg rests were applied to residents' wheelchairs prior to loading/unloading from the facility vehicle. Education included ensuring the resident's legs remain on leg rests while the wheelchair was being moved. Interviews with the Transportation Aide, Activities Director and Payroll Specialist showed they had been in-serviced on the process of applying leg rests to wheelchairs prior to resident being loaded/unloaded from the facility vehicle and ensuring resident's legs remain on leg rests while the wheelchair was being moved. Staff indicated they would notify the DON if a resident refused leg rests. During an interview with the DON, she indicated if the resident chose not to have leg rests or refused leg rests, the resident would be educated on the benefit of using leg rests and it will be care planned. Transportation would not occur if leg rests were refused. A resident observation verified the resident's leg rests were on a wheelchair prior transport to an appointment. The Transportation Aide confirmed the resident's legs were resting on the leg rests before moving the resident in and out of the facility's vehicle. The facility's corrective action plan was validated to be completed as of 11/2/23.
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information for 8 out of 19 nursing staff postings reviewed for staffing during the third quarter of 20...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information for 8 out of 19 nursing staff postings reviewed for staffing during the third quarter of 2022. Findings included: A review of the nursing staff posting (a report of nursing staff directly responsible for resident care from 04/23/22 through 06/30/22 was conducted. The nursing staff posting included the day shift 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM, the evening shift 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM, and the night shift 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM. Each shift listed the category of Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), the facility census (number of residents in the facility), and a column for the number and actual hours worked. A review of the actual working assignment sheets compared to the daily nursing staff posting sheets from 04/23/22 through 06/30/22 revealed 8 out of 19 staff posting sheets were noted to have discrepancies of actual nursing staff that were physically in the facility working at the beginning of each shift including the RNs, LPNs, and CNAs. An interview was conducted with the Scheduler on 08/23/23 at 3:00 PM. The Scheduler stated her role as a Scheduler was to fill out the nursing staff posting sheets daily and she completed that by reviewing the monthly assignment schedule for nurses and nurse aides and recorded the facility census. She stated she completed the nursing staff posting sheet the evening before the next day and it was up to herself and the nursing staff to ensure it was updated to reflect the number of staff that were actually in the building. The Scheduler reported she had been working in this role since July 2023 and she was not working as the Scheduler in 2022. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 08/23/23 at 3:15 PM. The Administrator reviewed the 8 nursing staff posting sheets compared to the staffing assignment sheets, and he confirmed that the staff did not update the facility nursing staff posting to reflect how many staff were in the building on those 8 days and they should have. He stated he needed to provide additional training to all nursing staff to ensure they understood that the nursing staff posting daily census needed to be updated to reflect the number of staff in the building to provide care to our residents.
Apr 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to dispose of expired medications from the medication storage cabinet and medication refrigeration storage in one of 2 medication storage...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to dispose of expired medications from the medication storage cabinet and medication refrigeration storage in one of 2 medication storage rooms observed and failed to date an inhalation medication when opened on 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. Findings Included: On 04/12/22 at 9:00 AM an unopened bottle of Aspirin 81 milligrams with an expiration date of 01/21/22 was found in the stock medication cabinet in the medication storage room. In the medication refrigeration in the medication storage room an opened bottle of Magic Mouthwash (a liquid substance used orally by swishing the drug inside the mouth for a certain amount of time then spitting it out) was noted with instruction to dispose of the unused portion after the expiration date of 03/26/22. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/12/22 at 9:00 AM. The DON reported the medication room was checked for expired medications on 04/11/22 by the Pharmacist. The DON stated the medication rooms were also checked twice weekly by the night nurses. The DON stated the expired medications should have been seen by either the Pharmacist or the night nurse and should have been removed from the stock rotation and the refrigerator. On 04/12/22 at 10:00 AM a package of Budesonide (an inhalant medication) 0.5/2 milliliters was noted to be opened but had no open date written on the package or the box. An interview with Nurse #4 on 04/12/22 at 10:00 AM stated she should have dated the box when she opened it. An interview with the DON on 04/14/22 at 4:10 PM revealed she expected her designated nursing staff to ensure the medication carts and the medication storage rooms were free of any expired medications and all medications that were opened had an open date written on them.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0849 (Tag F0849)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have all hospice information including progress notes and ca...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have all hospice information including progress notes and care plan available in the medical record to assure that the services provided were coordinated for 1of 2 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. The findings included: Resident #7 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #7 ' s diagnoses included congestive heart failure, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, and chronic pain. Review of Resident #7 ' s medical record revealed a physician order dated 10/25/21 for referral to hospice services. On 10/26/21 Hospice services which included skilled nursing, chaplain, nursing assistant (NA) and social worker began. Review of Resident #7 ' s medical record revealed a hospice plan of care for period of 10/26/21 through 1/23/22. Review of the hospice plan of care indicated that Resident #7 was to receive skilled nursing visits weekly, nursing assistant visits five times per week, social worker visits monthly and chaplain services two times per month. Review of Resident #7 ' s medical record revealed the last hospice nursing progress note was dated 12/2/21. The Director of Nursing (DON) obtained a progress note dated 1/13/22 from the hospice provider which indicated hospice provided weekly skilled nursing visits. DON verified that there were no other notes in the facility that had not been placed in the medical record. DON was unable to obtain more recent notes or notes from any other disciplines from the hospice provider. Review of Resident #7 ' s Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed received Hospice services and a condition or chronic disease resulting in six month or less life expectancy. Review of Resident #7 ' s care plan dated 2/4/22 revealed that resident was receiving hospice services with a goal of through next ninety days. Interview on 4/13/22 at 11:45 AM with Nurse #2 revealed she was not aware that Resident #7 was on hospice services and was not aware where or how hospice staff document on the residents. Interview with DON on 4/13/22 at 2:17 PM revealed that her expectation was that hospice provide their documentation in a timely manner. DON further indicated that there is no specific time frame for when hospice sends their notes to the facility to be placed in the medical record. Hospice developed a Plan of Care within the first week of admission. DON was not aware of when the facility received a copy of the Hospice plan of care. DON stated that the facility care plan should include Hospice services and interventions. The DON indicated that she was designated as responsible for coordinating care for resident ' s receiving hospice services. Interview with MDS Nurse on 4/13/22 at 2:20 PM revealed that progress notes from Hospice were left at the facility, but she was unaware of when or how this occurred. MDS Nurse did not know why the last documentation from Hospice in Resident #7 ' s medical record was dated 12/2/21. MDS Nurse stated hospice care was listed in the facility care plan but not specific interventions or services. Interview on 4/14/22 at 2:30 PM with the administrator revealed that he expected that all hospice documentation including progress notes and care plan would be available in the medical record. The administrator indicated that he was not aware that the hospice provider was not providing timely documentation for residents receiving hospice services.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 4 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $14,689 in fines. Above average for North Carolina. Some compliance problems on record.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Glenflora's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Glenflora an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Glenflora Staffed?

CMS rates Glenflora's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the North Carolina average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Glenflora?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at Glenflora during 2022 to 2023. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Glenflora?

Glenflora is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by LUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 52 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Lumberton, North Carolina.

How Does Glenflora Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Glenflora's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Glenflora?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Glenflora Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Glenflora has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Glenflora Stick Around?

Glenflora has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the North Carolina average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Glenflora Ever Fined?

Glenflora has been fined $14,689 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Carolina average of $33,226. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Glenflora on Any Federal Watch List?

Glenflora is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.