Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's performance. With a state rank of #389 out of 417, they are in the bottom half of nursing homes in North Carolina, and ranked #5 out of 5 in Johnston County, meaning there are no better local options. The facility is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is relatively strong with a 4 out of 5 stars rating and a turnover rate of 45%, which is below the state average, indicating that staff may be more familiar with the residents' needs. However, the facility has accumulated $246,622 in fines, which is concerning and suggests ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents of concern include a resident who fell and was injured due to improper wheelchair securement during transport and another resident who fell off the bed when staff did not follow care instructions requiring two-person assistance. While staffing is a positive aspect, the serious safety violations raise significant alarms about the overall quality of care at this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In North Carolina
- #389/417
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 45% turnover. Near North Carolina's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $246,622 in fines. Lower than most North Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for North Carolina. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (45%)
3 points below North Carolina average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below North Carolina average (2.8)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near North Carolina avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews with the resident, staff, and the Medical Director, the facility failed to f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care person centered...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and Medical Director, Pharmacist Consultant, Sales Representative and staff interviews, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews with the Medical Director and staff, the facility failed to provide supplementa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure residents' medications in a locked medication cart for 1 of 6 medication carts observed (200-hall upper west medication cart)....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a process that provided an opportunity to formulate an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) ass...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Examiner and Physician, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 3 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Examiner and Physician interviews, the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and facility staff and Dialysis staff interviews the facility failed to have a system in place to monitor...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a device to secure catheter tubing and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 45% turnover. Below North Carolina's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $246,622 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $246,622 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in North Carolina. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the North Carolina average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 9 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab?
Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 160 certified beds and approximately 131 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Smithfield, North Carolina.
How Does Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab Stick Around?
Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for North Carolina nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab Ever Fined?
Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab has been fined $246,622 across 2 penalty actions. This is 6.9x the North Carolina average of $35,545. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Smithfield Manor Nursing And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
Smithfield Manor Nursing and Rehab is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.