Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

1705 South Tarboro Street, Wilson, NC 27893 (252) 399-8998
For profit - Corporation 90 Beds LIFEPOINT HEALTH Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#79 of 417 in NC
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in Wilson, North Carolina has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performs well compared to other facilities. It ranks #79 out of 417 in the state, placing it in the top half, and is #2 out of 5 in Wilson County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 1 in 2023 to 0 in 2025, and has strong staffing ratings with a 4-star score and a turnover rate of 43%, which is lower than the state average. Additionally, there have been no fines noted, which is a positive sign of compliance. However, a recent inspection revealed that an expired insulin pen was found on a medication cart, which raises concerns about medication management. Overall, while the facility has many strengths, families should be aware of the minor issues that need attention.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In North Carolina
#79/417
Top 18%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
43% turnover. Near North Carolina's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Carolina facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Carolina. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (43%)

    5 points below North Carolina average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 43%

Near North Carolina avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: LIFEPOINT HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Feb 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard an expired Novolog insulin flex pen fr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard an expired Novolog insulin flex pen from 1 of 4 medication carts observed. (300-hall medication cart) Findings included: A review of the Resident #33's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for [DATE] and [DATE] revealed she received Novolog Insulin flex pen for sliding scale coverage of blood sugars readings. She received one dose of Novolog Insulin on [DATE] and received twenty-two doses of Novolog Insulin in January: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. An observation of the 300-hall medication cart was conducted on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. in the presence of Medication Aide #1 who was assigned to the 300-hall medication cart. Resident #33's Novolog Insulin flex pen (100 units per milliliter) label was observed with [DATE] written as the date opened and the expiration date written as [DATE]. The label indicated the medication was to be discarded twenty days after opening. In an interview with Medication Aide #1 on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m., she stated the Infection Preventionist was responsible for checking the 300-hall medication cart, and nurses administered insulin to her residents. She said Resident #33 received Novolog Insulin as needed for elevated blood sugars and read the expiration date as [DATE] on the Novolog Insulin flex pen. On [DATE] at 11:27 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) observed Resident #33's Novolog Insulin flex pen from the 300-hall medication cart. She stated she could not tell if the open date was written as [DATE] or [DATE], and the expiration date written looked like [DATE]. Medication Aide #1 re-examined the Novolog flex pen and stated the open date written on the label looked like [DATE], and the expiration date written looked like [DATE]. She said she did not think Resident #33 had received Novolog Insulin on [DATE]. The DON disposed of Resident #33's Novolog Insulin Flex pen in a sharp container. In an interview with the DON on [DATE] at 11:32 a.m., she said the pharmacy checked the medication carts monthly, the Infection Preventionist (IP) checked the medication carts weekly, and the nursing staff checked the medication carts each shift and before administering medications to residents for expirations. She further stated the IP was to check the medication carts and medication rooms daily during the survey that week. An interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on [DATE] at 2:51 p.m., she stated she was responsible for checking the medications carts and medication rooms monthly, and she had checked the 300-hall medication cart on [DATE] and did not recall Resident #33's Novolog Insulin flex pen on the 300-hall medication cart. She disclosed medication carts and medication rooms should be checked weekly, and she had not been checking the medication carts and medication rooms weekly. She said she checked the medication rooms on Monday ([DATE]) and had not checked the medication carts that week as directed by the DON. On [DATE] at 3:00 p.m. in an interview with Nurse #1, she stated she administered Resident #33 her Novolog Insulin per sliding scale on [DATE] and could not recall using the Novolog Insulin flex pen dated with an expiration date of [DATE] and checking the expiration date on the label of the Novolog Insulin. She stated when a new insulin vials or flex pens were opened, the date opened and the expiration date which was 28-30 days after opening depending on the type of insulin was written on the label. She further stated the expirations date on insulin should be checked before administering insulin to Resident #33. A written statement dated [DATE] from Nurse #1 to the Director of Nursing revealed Nurse #1 wrote she could not specifically remember checking Resident #33's Novolog Insulin expiration date on [DATE] and she always checked the expiration dates. When she was done with the Novolog Insulin pen, she returned the Novolog Insulin pen to Medication Aide #1 who disposed of the Novolog Insulin Flex pen in the sharp container because it was empty. Therefore, the Novolog Insulin flex pen found on the 300-hall medication cart on [DATE] expired could not have been the Novolog Insulin flex pen used on [DATE]. A written statement not dated from Medication Aide #1 to the Director of Nursing revealed Nurse #1 returned Resident #33's Novolog Insulin flex pen to Medication Aide #1 on [DATE]. There was no more insulin in Resident #33's Novolog Insulin flex pen, and Medication Aide #1 discarded the Novolog Insulin flex pen into a sharp container on [DATE]. Medication Aide #1 wrote the Novolog Insulin flex pen found on 300-medication cart on [DATE] was not the one used for Resident #33 on the evening of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:03 a.m. in a phone interview with Pharmacist #1, she stated she randomly checked the contents of one medication cart and one medication room for expirations monthly. The last pharmacy medication cart check was performed on [DATE], and she checked the 100-hall medication cart. On [DATE] at 9:53 a.m. in a phone interview with Pharmacist #2, she disclosed pharmacy records showed Resident #33 was dispensed a Novolog Insulin Flex Pen 100 units per milliliter on [DATE] and [DATE] to the facility. She stated the Novolog Insulin flex pen expired after 28 days of removing from the refrigerator and opened.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in North Carolina.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Carolina facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the North Carolina average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center during 2023. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIFEPOINT HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 90 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Wilson, North Carolina.

How Does Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Stick Around?

Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for North Carolina nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Ever Fined?

Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Wilson Rehabilitation And Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Wilson Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.