BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
The Benedictine Living Center of Garrison has a Trust Grade of D, which means it is below average and raises some concerns about care quality. It ranks #45 out of 72 nursing homes in North Dakota, placing it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, but it is ranked #1 of 2 in McLean County, indicating it is the better local option. The facility is improving, as the number of reported issues decreased from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a 41% turnover rate, which is better than the state average of 48%. However, there are concerning incidents, including a resident who fell from a mechanical lift due to inadequate supervision, and instances of resident-to-resident abuse that were not properly addressed. Overall, while there are notable strengths in staffing, the facility has significant areas for improvement in resident safety and care practices.
- Trust Score
- D
- In North Dakota
- #45/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near North Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $12,735 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below North Dakota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below North Dakota average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assis...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to report incidents of resident-to-re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of manufacturer's instructions for use, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #20 and Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents remained free fr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed the appropriateness to self-administer m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed stan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient supervision and/or assistive devices for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #13) obs...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0710
(Tag F0710)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's response to changes in resident's weight for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #23, #44, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #14 and Resident #27) and 5 su...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on information provided by the complainant, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency within two hours and the results of t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on information provided by the complainant, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an abuse allegation for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 41% turnover. Below North Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $12,735 in fines. Above average for North Dakota. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison Staffed?
CMS rates BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison?
BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 52 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GARRISON, North Dakota.
How Does Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison Stick Around?
BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison Ever Fined?
BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON has been fined $12,735 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,206. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Benedictine Living Center Of Garrison on Any Federal Watch List?
BENEDICTINE LIVING CENTER OF GARRISON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.