LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lutheran Sunset Home in Grafton, North Dakota, has a Trust Grade of C, indicating it is average and in the middle of the pack compared to other facilities. It ranks #41 out of 72 in the state, placing it in the bottom half, although it is #1 out of 2 in Walsh County, meaning it is the best local option. The facility's performance is worsening, with the number of reported issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 9 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a perfect 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 46%, slightly below the state average, but RN coverage is concerning, as it is lower than 83% of facilities in North Dakota. Recent inspections revealed serious concerns, including a resident being injured during a transfer due to improper use of a lift, infection control violations that could spread illness, and food safety issues in the kitchen, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses in the home's overall care.
- Trust Score
- C
- In North Dakota
- #41/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $11,057 in fines. Higher than 58% of North Dakota facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 41 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for North Dakota. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Dakota average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of manufacturer's instructions for use, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents and/or injury for 1 of 3 sampled residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is served and stored in accordance with professional standard...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #2, #33, #7...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0570
(Tag F0570)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the coverage of 1 of 1 surety bond provided the required coverage of all personal funds for reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 1. Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of a facility reported incident, the facility failed to pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report alleged violations involving neglect to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of a facility reported incident, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure participation by the medical director for 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, facility documentation, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve, prepare, and store food in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen. Failure to discard spoiled fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure proper skin care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #58)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, facility policy review, review of menus, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to serve food according to prepared menus during 1 of 2 meals observed (the evening...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 4 nutrition stations (Station 2). Failure to monitor refrigera...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices during observations on 3 of 3 days of survey (September 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $11,057 in fines. Above average for North Dakota. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (58/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Lutheran Sunset Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Lutheran Sunset Home Staffed?
CMS rates LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lutheran Sunset Home?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 15 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Lutheran Sunset Home?
LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 87 certified beds and approximately 82 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GRAFTON, North Dakota.
How Does Lutheran Sunset Home Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lutheran Sunset Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Lutheran Sunset Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lutheran Sunset Home Stick Around?
LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Lutheran Sunset Home Ever Fined?
LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME has been fined $11,057 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,189. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lutheran Sunset Home on Any Federal Watch List?
LUTHERAN SUNSET HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.