VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Valley Senior Living on Columbia has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average. It ranks #32 out of 72 nursing homes in North Dakota, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #2 out of 3 in Grand Forks County, meaning only one other local option is better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 6 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 42%, which is lower than the state average of 48%. However, the facility has faced some serious concerns, including a resident who fell during a transfer due to improper use of a gait belt and another resident who was not supervised during meals, which put them at risk for choking. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and care, families should be aware of the recent incidents that highlight areas for improvement.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In North Dakota
- #32/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near North Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $27,119 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 80 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of North Dakota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below North Dakota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent acci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a compre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 1 of 29 sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice election form for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #79) receiving hospice services....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for (2 of 21) sampled residents (Resident #49, and #154) and one supp...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for removal of a foley catheter for 1 of 7 sampled residents with a catheter (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #56) observed during ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to store dietary supplements under safe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 42% turnover. Below North Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $27,119 in fines. Higher than 94% of North Dakota facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Valley Senior Living On Columbia's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Valley Senior Living On Columbia Staffed?
CMS rates VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Valley Senior Living On Columbia?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Valley Senior Living On Columbia?
VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 196 certified beds and approximately 184 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GRAND FORKS, North Dakota.
How Does Valley Senior Living On Columbia Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Valley Senior Living On Columbia?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Valley Senior Living On Columbia Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Valley Senior Living On Columbia Stick Around?
VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Valley Senior Living On Columbia Ever Fined?
VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA has been fined $27,119 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,350. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Valley Senior Living On Columbia on Any Federal Watch List?
VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ON COLUMBIA is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.