COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Country Club Ret Center III has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families looking for care. It ranks #246 out of 913 facilities in Ohio, placing it in the top half, and #8 out of 12 in Ashtabula County, meaning only a few local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 6 in 2024. While staffing is a weaker area, rated at 2 out of 5 stars with a 50% turnover rate, it does have good RN coverage, exceeding 79% of Ohio facilities, which can help catch potential problems. However, there are concerning incidents such as failing to follow proper hygiene protocols during catheter care for several residents, not implementing an abuse policy after a reported incident, and not providing adequate individualized care for a resident's edema, indicating a need for improvement in their care practices.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Ohio
- #246/913
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Ohio. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Ohio avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
May 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to implement the abuse policy and procedure after receipt of an allegation of abuse for Resident #52. This affected one residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide individualized and sufficient care to manage edema for Resident #24. This affected one reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care for Resident #170. This aff...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, and the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs were...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document the resident's diagnoses to justify use of ordered medications. This affected one resident (#48) of five residents revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, review of the memorandum from the Department of Health & Human Services, and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease C...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #51's medicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, documented staff statements, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, documented staff statements, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a fal...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure facility temperatures of common areas and resident rooms were monitored and documented during a power outage...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2020
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure advance directives for Resident #43 were accurately and consi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Ohio.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Country Club Ret Center I I I's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Country Club Ret Center I I I Staffed?
CMS rates COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Ohio average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Country Club Ret Center I I I?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I during 2020 to 2024. These included: 10 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Country Club Ret Center I I I?
COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by COUNTRY CLUB REHABILITATION CAMPUS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 73 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 99% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ASHTABULA, Ohio.
How Does Country Club Ret Center I I I Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Country Club Ret Center I I I?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Country Club Ret Center I I I Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Country Club Ret Center I I I Stick Around?
COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Ohio nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Country Club Ret Center I I I Ever Fined?
COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Country Club Ret Center I I I on Any Federal Watch List?
COUNTRY CLUB RET CENTER I I I is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.