JUDSON PARK
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Judson Park has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families, placing it solidly in the middle range of nursing homes. It ranks #90 out of 913 facilities in Ohio, which means it is performing above average, and #10 out of 92 in Cuyahoga County, signifying only nine local options are better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from three in 2023 to five in 2024. Staffing is a notable strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, well below the state average, ensuring consistency and familiarity for residents. Unfortunately, the facility has incurred $25,847 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 86% of other Ohio facilities, hinting at compliance issues. Specific incidents include a serious fall where a resident, deemed at high risk, fell and fractured a hip due to inadequate supervision and lack of fall prevention measures. Another incident involved a resident falling from a Hoyer lift during a transfer, leading to significant injuries, which indicates a failure in adhering to safe transfer protocols. While Judson Park has some strengths, particularly in staffing, these serious incidents raise concerns that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Ohio
- #90/913
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $25,847 in fines. Lower than most Ohio facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 66 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Ohio nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and individualized care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative regarding the facility bed hold policy upon discharge to hospital. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Transfer
(Tag F0626)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after dis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained an accurate representation of the resident's actual experience. This affected one (Resident #27) of thre...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, review of emergency medical services report, review of hospital records, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #181, #184 and #186 had accurate advan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza vaccinations were offe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were functioning and that needed repairs received timely intervention. This affected one of one residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2020
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure two residents (Residents #20 and #137) of five ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered and secure for one...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $25,847 in fines. Higher than 94% of Ohio facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Judson Park's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JUDSON PARK an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Judson Park Staffed?
CMS rates JUDSON PARK's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Judson Park?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at JUDSON PARK during 2020 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Judson Park?
JUDSON PARK is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 36 certified beds and approximately 27 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CLEVELAND, Ohio.
How Does Judson Park Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, JUDSON PARK's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Judson Park?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Judson Park Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JUDSON PARK has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Judson Park Stick Around?
JUDSON PARK has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Judson Park Ever Fined?
JUDSON PARK has been fined $25,847 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Ohio average of $33,337. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Judson Park on Any Federal Watch List?
JUDSON PARK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.