JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Joshua Tree Care Center in North Olmsted, Ohio, has an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating it is considered excellent and highly recommended. It ranks #89 out of 913 nursing homes in Ohio, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #9 out of 92 in Cuyahoga County, meaning only eight local options are better. The facility's trend is stable, with the number of reported issues remaining the same at five from 2023 to 2025. While staffing has a rating of 3 out of 5, which is average, the turnover rate is a positive 33%, significantly lower than the state average, suggesting staff retention is good. However, there are some areas of concern, including incidents where food was not properly labeled or dated, leading to potential contamination risks, and instances where RN coverage was insufficient for eight consecutive hours, which could impact resident care. Overall, while the facility has strong ratings and good staffing, families should be aware of these concerns.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Ohio
- #89/913
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Ohio's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Ohio. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Ohio average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
13pts below Ohio avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for post-traumatic stress disord...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure showers were complet...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure food was labeled and dated in a manner to prevent food contamination and spoilage, failed to ensure expired food wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney diseas...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure its facility assessment contained ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the service of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight hours a day seven days a week as required. This had the potential to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated properly and the walk in freezer was maintained in good working condition. This had the potential to a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement and maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance Performance and Improvement (QAPI) plan. This had the potential to affect all 30 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement and monitor measures to prevent the potential spread of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 30 residents residing at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure notices of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC) contained all ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2020
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and that food was properly stored. This affected 47 out 47 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Ohio.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
- • 33% turnover. Below Ohio's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Joshua Tree's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Joshua Tree Staffed?
CMS rates JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Ohio average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Joshua Tree?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER during 2020 to 2025. These included: 8 with potential for harm and 3 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Joshua Tree?
JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 36 certified beds and approximately 32 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NORTH OLMSTED, Ohio.
How Does Joshua Tree Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Joshua Tree?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Joshua Tree Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Joshua Tree Stick Around?
JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Ohio nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Joshua Tree Ever Fined?
JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Joshua Tree on Any Federal Watch List?
JOSHUA TREE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.