ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Allbridge Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns about care. It ranks #583 out of 913 facilities in Ohio, placing it in the bottom half, and #22 out of 56 in Franklin County, suggesting only a few local options are better. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, which is well below the Ohio average, but they received a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars for staffing overall. However, the facility has accumulated fines of $22,835, which is higher than 83% of Ohio facilities, indicating potential compliance issues. While RN coverage is average, it's noted that specific incidents have raised alarms, such as a resident sustaining second-degree burns after accessing a locked employee breakroom without supervision and the facility's failure to adequately complete tuberculosis risk assessments for staff, potentially affecting all residents. This combination of strengths and weaknesses should be carefully considered by families looking for care options.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Ohio
- #583/913
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $22,835 in fines. Higher than 99% of Ohio facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Ohio. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Ohio average (3.2)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
May 2025
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0567
(Tag F0567)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, records review and resident family interview, the facility failed to have written authorization to handle resident funds. This affected one (Resident #22) of five residents r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, review of the self reported incident, staff interview and review of the facility policy and proc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care included services for checkin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have functioning call lights in two rooms. This affected two (Resident #14 and #21) of six resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/12/24. Medical diagnoses included cognitive commun...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and test tray, the facility failed to maintain palatable and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary condi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview and document review the facility failed to timely submit at least quarterly the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information for quarter one of 2025 to Centers for Medicar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, review of personnel files, review of the tuberculosis (TB) risk assessment, and review of facility policies the facility failed to fully complete the TB risk assessment and failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain and sanitary and homelike environment. This had the po...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for EBP. The f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents received the treatment and care in accordanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, record review ,observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not greater than 5% when they tried to administer another Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of Resident #34,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed medical record review, facility policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #37's power ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $22,835 in fines. Higher than 94% of Ohio facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Staffed?
CMS rates ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER during 2024 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?
ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MORDECHAI WEISZ, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 43 certified beds and approximately 36 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLUMBUS, Ohio.
How Does Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Stick Around?
ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Ever Fined?
ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER has been fined $22,835 across 6 penalty actions. This is below the Ohio average of $33,307. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Allbridge Rehabilitation And Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?
ALLBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.