GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Gardens of McGregor and Amasa Stone has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good option for families considering care for their loved ones. It ranks #67 out of 913 nursing homes in Ohio, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #6 out of 92 in Cuyahoga County, meaning only five local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 4 in 2023 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 63%, which is higher than the state average. Additionally, there have been some serious incidents, such as a resident suffering a hip dislocation due to inadequate supervision during care, and concerns regarding medication reviews for several residents. On a positive note, the facility does have strong overall quality measures and excellent health inspection ratings, indicating a commitment to resident care.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Ohio
- #67/913
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $15,651 in fines. Higher than 85% of Ohio facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Ohio. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
17pts above Ohio avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
15 points above Ohio average of 48%
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide care and services to a resident's change in condition. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, hospital record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and intervention to prevent and mitigate a fall with injury for Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy reviews were completed for Resident #3, #9,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all nursing unit serveries were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent the risk of attracting pests, and contamination o...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** #5. Review of the medial record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 03/27/23 with diagnoses of chronic diastolic cong...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia without behavio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2018
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and family of Resident 48's finger being red a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain an order, identify the medical symptoms and asse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hypotensio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the medical record for Resident #127 revealed an admission date of 03/15/17 and diagnoses included contractures at mul...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #58 received staff assistance to eat meal...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications with an error rate less than 5%. This affected two residents, Resident #25 and Resident #380, of six r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store medications in the packaging with the resident's name and with the physician's order/direction for administration of th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed while serving residents food in the first-floor south hall dining room. This had the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $15,651 in fines. Above average for Ohio. Some compliance problems on record.
- • 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone Staffed?
CMS rates GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 63%, which is 17 percentage points above the Ohio average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE during 2018 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone?
GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 148 certified beds and approximately 134 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in EAST CLEVELAND, Ohio.
How Does Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (63%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone Stick Around?
Staff turnover at GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE is high. At 63%, the facility is 17 percentage points above the Ohio average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone Ever Fined?
GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE has been fined $15,651 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Ohio average of $33,235. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Gardens Of Mcgregor And Amasa Stone on Any Federal Watch List?
GARDENS OF MCGREGOR AND AMASA STONE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.