HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER

402 GOLF VIEW LANE, HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143 (440) 443-0900
For profit - Corporation 96 Beds SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
18/100
#868 of 913 in OH
Last Inspection: March 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns regarding resident care. Ranking #868 out of 913 facilities in Ohio places them in the bottom half, and #88 out of 92 in Cuyahoga County means they have few local competitors that perform better. The facility is reportedly improving, with issues decreasing from 12 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but it still faces serious challenges, including a staffing turnover rate of 69%, which is concerning compared to the state average of 49%. Additionally, the facility has accumulated $28,276 in fines, which is higher than 78% of Ohio facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. While the RN coverage is average, there have been alarming incidents, such as the failure to stop administering a blood thinner to a resident with dangerously high blood levels, which posed a serious risk of harm. Another incident involved a resident not receiving timely treatment for a life-threatening condition, leading to a hospital visit. Furthermore, the facility has been criticized for inadequate sanitation around garbage dumpsters, which could affect all residents. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering Highland Pointe for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
18/100
In Ohio
#868/913
Bottom 5%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
12 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$28,276 in fines. Higher than 93% of Ohio facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Ohio. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 12 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Ohio average (3.2)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 69%

23pts above Ohio avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $28,276

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (69%)

21 points above Ohio average of 48%

The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Sept 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary area surrounding the garbage dumpsters. This had the potential for affect all residents residing in the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary area surrounding the garbage dumpsters. This had the potential for affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include:Observations on 09/15/25 at 5:40 A.M. of the dumpster area noted several large bags of garbage filled with soiled briefs, latex gloves, wipes, plasticware, and food were located on the ground surrounding the three dumpsters. The doors and lids of the dumpsters were left open allowing racoons to enter and pull out the garbage. Interview on 09/15/25 at 5:39 A.M., [NAME] #208 verified the opened garbage bags on the ground. Interview on 09/15/25 at 9:40 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 verified the findings and stated the racoons come from the woods and tear open the bags all the time. Review of facility policies noted no policy provided created/implemented by the facility related to maintaining a sanitary dumpster area. This deficiency was an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary homelike environment for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary homelike environment for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observations on 09/15/25 from 5:00 A.M. to 5:40 A.M. noted miscellaneous items and debris on the floor in the halls throughout the facility. The debris included silverware and plastic utensils, latex gloves, paper straws, and linen on the floor. There were dinner trays full of food located on carts in resident halls and in the dining room. A medication cart located on the 300-hall had miscellaneous debris (powder like) substance along the entire bottom of the medication cart. Interview on 09/15/25 at 5:05 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 verified the debris and items on the floor and went back to work. Interview on 09/15/25 at 5:10 A.M., LPN #203 verified the findings stating staff just cleaned out the drawers of the medication cart a few days ago. Review of facility policies noted no policy provided created/implemented by the facility related to staff maintaining communal areas daily. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 1396690 (OH00165974).
Jun 2024 6 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of a police and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) report, so...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of a police and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) report, social media review, review of the Food and Drug Administration online medication information, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to timely respond and take appropriate action (e.g., suspending administration of an anticoagulant) in regard to an elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR) for Resident #11, who was receiving Warfarin (Coumadin) for atrial fibrillation. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious harm on 05/20/24 when the resident's INR, per laboratory testing, was abnormally high at 4.9 and staff failed to notify the physician or stop the administration of the medication, Coumadin. Staff continued to administer Coumadin 7.5 milligrams on 05/20/24 and 05/21/24 despite the high laboratory value, indicating the resident's blood was too thin and requiring a greater length of time to form a blood clot. On 05/22/24, Resident #11 reported he was having nose and gum bleeding. The resident subsequently called 911 for transport to the hospital for medical care. Upon Emergency Medical Service (EMS) arrival, EMS staff noted a large amount of bloody paper towels on the resident's bedside table. Upon arrival at the hospital (on 05/22/24 at 9:25 P.M.) the resident's chief complaint included nose and gum bleeding. Hospital emergency laboratory testing revealed the resident's PT was elevated at 63.4 seconds (reference range 9.7-13.0) and the INR was abnormally high at 7.2 (therapeutic range 2-3 with an anticoagulant planned INR of 2.5). The resident required treatment with Vitamin K (used to counteract the anticoagulant medication) intravenously and was hospitalized until 06/03/24 for ongoing care and treatment. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed for Coumadin use. On 06/12/24 at 10:25 A.M. the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Registered Nurse (RRN) #979 were notified Immediate Jeopardy began on 05/20/24 when the facility failed to monitor physician ordered laboratory results (INR) to ensure Resident #11's Coumadin was effective (by not allowing the resident's blood to clot too quickly or too slowly) and failed to notify the physician of an abnormally elevated INR result (4.9) to suspend the administration of Resident #11's Coumadin. Nursing staff continued to administer the Coumadin despite the elevated INR results placing the resident at significant risk for bleeding/continued blood loss. Resident #11 contacted EMS for emergent transport to the hospital for evaluation, received intravenous Vitamin K to counteract the effects of Coumadin and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for ongoing care and treatment. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/23/24 when the facility implemented the following corrective actions: • Resident #11 was discharged to the hospital on 5/22/24 at 9:00 P.M. • On 05/23/24 at 11:00 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #918 and Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager (UM) #922 reviewed Resident #11's medical record, medication administration record (MAR), progress notes and laboratory results (labs) to identify the root cause related to the bleeding incident on 05/22/24. The facility identified the root cause as nursing staff including Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #883 and LPN #963 failed to check Resident #11's PT/INR level prior to administering Coumadin 7.5 mg to Resident #11 on 05/20/24 and 05/22/24 and failed to notify medical doctor (MD)/Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #980 of Resident #11's abnormal INR level in a timely manner. • On 05/23/24 at 11:30 A.M. the DON, ADON #918, RN UM #922 and Regional RN (RRN) #979 completed an in house audit and confirmed four residents resided in the facility who receive Coumadin including Residents #38, #44 #76 and #82. Resident records for Residents #38, #44, #76 and #82 were reviewed which included the lab reports, medication administration records (MARs), progress notes and care plans to ensure that abnormal labs were reported to Nurse Practitioner (NP) #980 in a timely manner and that Coumadin was not administered to residents with a PT/INR greater than 3.0, without negative findings. T • On 05/23/24 at 12:00 P.M. the DON, RN ADON #918, RN UM #922 and Regional RN #979 completed assessments/skin checks on Residents #38, #44, #76 and #82 (receiving Coumadin) to ensure the residents did not have signs of bleeding or bruising. • On 05/23/24 at 1:00 P.M. RRN #979 completed competencies, in person with return demonstration, with the DON, ADON #918 and RN UM #922 to review PT/INR blood work prior to administering Coumadin and education was provided on reporting of abnormal labs to CNP #980 of the specific resident by the end of the shift. • On 05/23/24 at 2:00 P.M., LPN #883 and LPN #963 (two nurses who were out of compliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy) were educated (in person) by the DON, with return demonstration, on checking residents PT/INR blood work prior to administering Coumadin and on reporting of abnormal labs to CNP #980 of the specific Resident by end of shift. • On 05/23/24 beginning at 2:00 P.M. through 4:35 P.M., RRN #979 completed an audit of the lab work for Residents #38, #44, #76 and #82. NP #980 was notified of all lab results. The audit revealed Resident #76's PT/INR lab work dated 05/23/24 had an INR of 3.6 and the NP was notified on 05/23/24 and ordered to hold the Coumadin dose and repeat the INR on 05/24/24. • On 05/23/24 at 2:15 P.M., the DON, ADON #918 and RN UM #922 completed competencies with LPN #883 and LPN #963, in person with return demonstration, on checking residents PT/INR prior to giving Coumadin and to ensure that the lab results are reported to CNP #980 of the specific Resident by end of shift. • On 05/23/24 at 3:30 P.M. the facility held an emergency Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting. The QAPI meeting was held to review the root cause, reviewed the facility abatement plan due to the nurses administering Coumadin prior to checking Resident #11's PT/INR labs and not notifying NP #980 responsible for Resident #11's care, by the end of the shift. Medical Director #669, the Administrator, the DON, ADON #918, Environmental Services Director (ESD) #805, Pharmacist #1012 (participated over the phone), RRN #979, Social Services Designee (SSD) #931, Activity Director (AD) #930 and Rehab Director #1024 participated in the QAPI meeting. • On 05/23/24 at 6:00 P.M. the DON developed and implemented a PT/INR Coumadin flow sheet. ADON #918 and RN UM #922 were educated on the form, how to implement the form, when to use the form and what to do for abnormalities identified on the form. Both nurses would print Coumadin lab reports five days a week at Clinical Morning Meetings to review any changes in orders due to any abnormal lab results & to ensure the CNP of the specific resident was notified of the results by the end of the reporting shift. • On 05/23/24 at 6:30 P.M. the Coumadin flow sheet was implemented by ADON #918 and RN UM #922. The form would be completed each time a blood draw was ordered with results received for each resident on Coumadin. The abnormal results would be reported to CNP #980 of the specific resident by end of the reporting shift. • On 05/23/24 at 11:45 P.M. the DON, ADON #918 and RN UM #922 completed education in person and via phone to all 17 staff LPNs and all six staff RNs on checking residents' PT/INR results prior to giving Coumadin and to ensure that the lab results were reported to NP #980 of the specific resident by the end of the reporting shift. In addition, all 37 staff State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) were educated on observing for abnormal effects of Coumadin including bleeding, bruising and black tarry stools and reporting abnormalities to the nurse. The facility also used agency staffing including four agency RN's (to be educated from 05/23/24 to 06/04/24), eight agency LPN's (to be educated from 05/27/24 to 06/11/24) and five agency STNA's (to be educated from 05/24/24 to 06/09/24) who work as needed in the facility. RRN #979 confirmed the agency staff members were educated over the phone and would not work in the facility from 05/23/24 to 06/14/24, unless they had received the education prior to their next scheduled shift. The facility indicated all new hires would receive the education during orientation. • On 05/23/24 at 11:45 P.M. the DON, ADON #918 and RN UM #922 completed competencies to ensure 17 LPNs and six RNs were checking residents PT/INR prior to giving Coumadin and to ensure that the lab results are reported to NP #980 in a timely manner. • To ensure ongoing compliance, the DON/ADON/UM/Designee would audit PT/INR lab results and timely notification of the residents' NP four times a week for three weeks. The audits would be completed beginning on 06/06/24 and the facility would then continue a monthly audit for the next two months, during clinical morning meetings, for verification the PT/INR results were reviewed and reported to the residents' NP as needed. The results of the audits would be forwarded to the facility QAPI committee for additional review and recommendations. Although the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 05/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a Severity Level 2 (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy) as the facility is still in the process of implementing their corrective action plan and monitoring to ensure on-going compliance. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain in the left leg, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (intermittent irregular heartbeat in the upper chambers of the heart). The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #11's baseline care plan dated 05/15/24 revealed the resident would be monitored for abnormal bleeding due to anticoagulation treatment. The care plan revealed the resident would receive anticoagulant therapy as ordered; would be observed for any signs and symptoms of abnormal bleeding including bruising, tarry stools, nose bleeds, bleeding gums and/or hemorrhage; would receive education on the risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy if needed; be monitored as ordered for lab tests to monitor coagulation factors and have any abnormal findings reported to the provider including the physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/16/24 for Warfarin (Coumadin) 7.5 mg one tablet to be administered orally once daily (scheduled to be administered between 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M.); and an order dated 05/18/24 to obtain a Prothrombin Time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) (The INR is a standardized number that measures how long it takes blood to clot. It's calculated using the results of the PT test, which measures how quickly the liquid portion of a person's blood clots. The INR is used to monitor people who take blood thinners, also known as anticoagulants, like Coumadin, to help ensure the medication is working properly. The higher the INR, the longer it takes the person's blood to clot) two times per week on Monday and Thursday. Further review of the medical record revealed no specific parameters for changes to the resident's Coumadin dosage or parameters for contacting/notifying the physician related to the INR results. Record review (also dated 05/16/24) revealed nursing staff were to initial for anticoagulant monitoring every shift (ensuring the PT/INR results were reviewed/available and the daily dose of Coumadin was available in the medication cart for the evening/night administration). This was documented on the medication administration record for the respective dates and shifts during the resident's stay. Review of Resident #11's laboratory testing revealed the resident's bloodwork was collected on (Thursday) 05/16/24 at 7:10 A.M. and reported on 05/16/24 at 3:57 P.M. The results of the PT and INR dated Thursday, 05/16/24 revealed the PT was 19.3 seconds and the resident's INR was 1.9. There was no evidence of any changes to the Coumadin order at this time. Review of Resident #11's laboratory testing revealed a PT/INR was drawn on (Monday) 05/20/24 at 2:50 P.M. and reported on 05/20/24 at 5:47 P.M. The resident's PT was 47.1 seconds (elevated), and the resident's INR was 4.9 (elevated). This laboratory form indicated the standard anticoagulant was 2.0 to 3.0 range for the INR and aggressive anticoagulant treatment was 2.5 to 3.5 INR range. Record review revealed no evidence the physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant were notified of this abnormally high laboratory test result on 05/20/24. Review of Resident #11's medication administration records (MAR) and treatment administration records (TAR) from 05/20/24 to 05/22/24 revealed on 05/20/24 during the dayshift, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #935 documented on the MAR, the INR was not applicable (NA); on 05/20/24 during the nightshift, LPN #883 documented on the MAR that the INR was 1.9 (however, these were the INR results obtained in 05/16/24). On 05/21/24 during the dayshift, LPN #935 documented the INR on the MAR as NA; On 05/21/24 during the nightshift, LPN #963 documented the INR on the MAR as 4.9; and on 05/22/24 during the dayshift, RN #812 documented the INR on the MAR as 4.9. Review of Resident #11's MAR from 05/15/24 to 05/22/24 revealed the resident was not administered the ordered Coumadin 7.5 mg on 05/15/24 (date of admission). The comment indicated it was a new order. The MAR revealed the resident was administered Coumadin 7.5 mg on 05/16/24, 05/17/24, 05/18/24, 05/19/24, 05/20/24 and 05/21/24. The medication was scheduled to be administered daily from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. The record noted the Coumadin was held on 05/22/24 because the resident was in the hospital. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed no evidence the physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant were notified of the PT/INR result of 4.9 on 05/20/24 or 05/21/24. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition and the resident was on an anticoagulant. Review of Resident #11's progress note dated 05/22/24 at 7:32 P.M., authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #812, revealed the resident notified RN #812 that he blew his nose and blood clots were coming out of his nose and a small amount in his mouth. Vital signs were stable, and the nurse practitioner was notified of the resident's INR level with a new order to hold Coumadin dose until further notice. The resident was made aware. There was no indication an order was obtained to check the resident's PT/INR at that time. Review of an Incident/Offense Report form dated 05/22/24 at 8:48 P.M., authored by Police #506 and Police #507, revealed Resident #11 had called 911 due to bleeding from his mouth and nose. The resident stated he had been bleeding from his nose and gums all day. The resident reported he was on a blood thinner and was taken by stretcher to the hospital. Review of Resident #11's progress note dated 05/22/24 at 9:00 P.M., authored by LPN #963, revealed LPN #963 was exiting another resident's room when EMS staff were observed going into Resident #11's room with a stretcher. The note indicated the resident called them (EMS) himself without letting the nurse know. A face sheet and medication list were sent with the resident to the hospital. Review of Resident #11's social media (Facebook) posts/documentation dated 05/22/24 between 7:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. revealed the resident had posted information to the social media site related to his status and health care. This information included when the resident's blood was drawn a few days ago in dialysis, the resident personally delivered the tube of blood to the nurse for the lab to pick up (at the facility). The resident had a hard time clotting at the end of the (dialysis) treatment. Later in the evening, the resident asked LPN #983 if she had the results of the blood work because the resident was reluctant to take the 7.5 mg of Coumadin because he felt his blood was thin. The social media post revealed LPN #983 argued with the resident and said the INR was 1.8. The resident said that it was the bloodwork from 05/16/24 and LPN #983 stated it was the current bloodwork. An unidentified person responded on the resident's social media on 05/22/24 between 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. to call 911 and to tell them his bleeding would not stop, and his INR was 4.9. (The content of the social media/Facebook post was verified through telephone interview with Resident #11 on 06/13/24 at 3:05 P.M.) Review of a police report dated 05/22/24 (incident number 24-01975) revealed upon arrival, the police department observed a large amount of bloody paper towels on Resident #11's bedside table. The resident explained that since his arrival on 05/15/24, he had not received proper care and had documented the improper care on social media to keep track of the lack of care and keep a record to advocate for himself and others in the facility that may not be able to (advocate for themselves). Review of hospital documentation revealed the resident presented to the emergency room (on 05/22/24) with a chief complaint of spontaneous bleeding. The resident had called the squad himself for concerns of spontaneous bleeding. The resident reported he had been having nosebleeds and bleeding from the mouth for the past few days and was concerned about his INR being high. The resident had an admission diagnosis of coagulopathy (bleeding disorder; a condition in which the blood's ability to coagulate (form clots) is impaired. This condition can cause a tendency toward prolonged or excessive bleeding (bleeding diathesis) which may occur spontaneously or following an injury or medical and dental procedures. The resident received Vitamin K intravenously to counteract the effects of the Coumadin and assist in stabilizing his INR levels and was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] through 06/03/24 for continued medical care and monitoring. The resident did not return to the facility upon discharge from the hospital. On 05/29/24 at 6:36 A.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #963 revealed she was the nurse working and assigned to care for Resident #11 on 05/21/24 during the nightshift from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. LPN #963 revealed she did not notice the PT/INR for Resident #11 was out of range until after she had administered Coumadin 7.5 mg on 05/21/24. The LPN verified she did not report the elevated lab to the NP or the fact she had administered the resident's Coumadin without checking the INR first during her nightshift 05/21/24. LPN #963 stated on 05/22/24 at 7:00 P.M., when she came on shift to work, she was notified in the nursing shift to shift report by RN #812 that the NP was made aware of Resident #11's nose and mouth bleeding and the NP then gave an order to hold the Coumadin. LPN #963 stated the resident called for an ambulance to go to the hospital (on 05/22/24) while she was in another room. She stated she was unaware of any concerns until she had observed the squad with a stretcher going into Resident #11's room. LPN #963 stated she printed a face sheet and orders to send with the resident to the hospital and let the NP know the resident requested to be transported to the hospital. LPN #963 stated she was busy on her shift and did not think to call the physician after administering the Coumadin on 05/21/24 when she found out the PT/INR was elevated. Interview on 05/29/24 at 10:02 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #812 revealed she worked dayshift from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. on 05/22/24. RN #812 stated she talked to Resident #11 close to shift change around 7:00 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. about his Coumadin dosage and the NP orders to hold the Coumadin on 05/22/24. RN #812 stated the resident did not have concerns when she left the room, and the resident did not request to be sent to the hospital during her shift. She also stated she was not aware of the resident's nosebleed until she went in the room around 6:30 P.M. to answer the resident's call light and had observed the resident's bloody nose and several bloody tissues on his overbed table along with a bloody tissue in his hands RN #812 stated she immediately called the NP at that time and received new orders to hold the Coumadin. The RN denied knowledge of the resident's INR level until he (the resident) reported the bloody nose, and she reviewed the INR value. RN #812 denied an increase in monitoring Resident #11's condition because she stated she was not aware of the resident receiving the Coumadin with a high PT/INR. Telephone interview on 06/04/24 at 6:42 P.M. with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #980 revealed she was not aware of Resident #11's high PT/INR until the resident had the nosebleed and she ordered to hold the resident's Coumadin. The staff notified her the resident had gone out to the hospital (on 05/22/24). She indicated staff did not call her about the resident's abnormally high PT/INR result and they should have notified her (on 05/20/24) so the Coumadin could have been adjusted or held as necessary. Telephone interview on 06/10/24 at 6:03 P.M. with LPN #883 revealed she had administered Resident #11's Coumadin dose on 05/20/24 during the nightshift based on the lab work dated 05/16/24 (and not the lab work from 05/20/24). The LPN indicated the dayshift nurse told her the 05/16/24 lab work was the current lab work available for the resident and stated she did not physically check the lab system to see what the PT/INR was on the lab work obtained on 05/20/24. Telephone interview on 06/10/24 at 6:31 P.M. with Resident #11 with the Administrator and RRN #979 present revealed on 05/22/24, he had reported to RN #812 between 2:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. that his nose and gums were bleeding. Resident #11 stated RN #812 assessed his mouth and stated that he must have broken one of his teeth which caused bleeding. She provided a saltwater rinse for the resident. Resident #11 stated between 6:30 P.M. and 6:34 P.M., RN #812 came in and told him that his PT/INR was 4.9 and that his Coumadin was to be held. He stated at that point, he called his friends at the fire department and decided to call EMS for transport to the hospital. He stated he was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/03/24 to get his INR stabilized which included the administration of Vitamin K shots. The resident indicated the hospitalization would not have been necessary if the nursing staff had monitored his lab work closely and reported the abnormal labs to the physician before giving him his Coumadin. Interview on 06/12/24 at 10:30 A.M. with RRN #979 revealed the facility policy was for the dayshift nurses to check the medication cart to ensure Coumadin doses were available for resident administration and the nightshift nurses were responsible to check the PT/INR results and administer Coumadin as ordered. Telephone interview on 06/12/24 at 1:33 P.M. with Laboratory Staff (LS) #502 revealed their company did not call high labs and only called critical labs. When further questioned, she stated it was a different critical level result for each facility and their computer told them when to call the results to the facility. LS #502 revealed their company faxed Resident #11's lab results to the facility on [DATE] at 1:49 P.M., 4:49 P.M. and 5:54 P.M. When asked why the lab faxed the lab results three different times, LS #502 stated multiple lab staff members worked on the labs with high results and that was probably why the results were faxed to the facility three times. Interview on 06/14/24 at 7:11 A.M. with RRN #975 revealed the nurse who was assigned to care for a resident receiving Coumadin was responsible for calling in the lab work for the PT/INR to the physician/NP. She stated all residents on Coumadin had orders to monitor for signs and symptoms of bruising or bleeding and any adverse effects of anticoagulant therapy. RRN #975 stated the expectations of each physician of those residents on Coumadin were different but in general, all nurses should call immediately for a PT/INR of greater than 3.0 (standard 2.0 to 3.0). RRN #975 confirmed Resident #11's lab work results for his PT/INR were received by the facility (via fax) around 5:30 P.M. on 05/20/24 and LPN #935, who worked dayshift on both 05/20/24 and dayshift on 05/21/24, should have called the physician with the PT/INR results for Resident #11 as well as LPN #883, who worked nightshift on 05/20/24, and LPN #963, who worked nightshift on 05/21/24, should have called the physician/NP regarding Resident #11's elevated PT/INR results. RRN #975 stated Resident #11's NP was notified on 05/22/24 and did not indicate she wanted the resident transported to the hospital. RRN #975 stated the NP wanted the resident's Coumadin held on 05/22/24, but the resident did not feel comfortable with that order and requested his own emergency transport to the emergency room Interview on 06/14/24 at 8:18 A.M. with Fire Department #311 revealed he had responded to Resident #11's 911 call on 05/22/24 and their squad was on scene for 21 minutes. He stated he had observed Resident #11 with bloody towels on the table, bloody tissues, blood in cups and blood down the front of him. Fire Department #311 shared that upon arrival, three staff members were at the end of the hall laughing and talking on their cell phones while the squad team was in the building. No staff were present in the room helping Resident #11. Further interview revealed fire department staff asked the staff members for a mechanical lift to get the resident on a cot for transport and no staff members brought the mechanical lift or even talked to them and/or assessed the resident while the squad was in the room. He stated the resident's room was in deplorable condition with bloody towels/tissues and the floor was sticky (from the resident's blood). Fire Department #311 indicated the entire 21 minutes the squad was in the building, not one staff member had come in to assess, monitor or assist Resident #11 in any way. Fire Department #311 indicated he asked for Resident #11's resident information and the nurse handed him the form without talking to the squad about the resident or resident's care. Review of the undated facility Labs policy revealed the nightshift nurse was responsible for double checking the lab draw list and assuring all residents that were due for scheduled labs were on the requisition. Review of the facility Anticoagulation policy revised 05/27/21 revealed on admission, nursing would identify individuals who were currently anticoagulated. Residents would be monitored for possible complications associated with anticoagulation and providers would be promptly notified of any such complications. Anticoagulation therapy and monitoring would be included in the care plan. The nurse would obtain and verify anticoagulation orders from the provider. In the event there was a change in the dosage of the medication, all changes to the dosage would be made on the MAR. Supplemental orders for anticoagulated residents include antibiotic check, PT/INR frequency check, dose check, check (to verify the) dose in the medication cart was correct and monitor bleeding. Review of the Resident Change in Condition policy revised 11/10/20 revealed the charge nurse would notify the physician/provider/family of significant changes in condition. Review of Food and Drug (FDA) Highlights of Prescribing Information webpage www.fda.com revised 10/2011 revealed to adjust Warfarin (Coumadin) dose to maintain a target INR of 2.5 with an INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 for all treatment durations (related to treatment of atrial fibrillation). This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00154752 and Complaint Numbers OH00154261, OH00154253 OH00153950 and OH00153809.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's non-pressure skin ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's non-pressure skin treatments were administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for skin alterations. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, diabetes, and anemia. Review of Resident #40's skin breakdown care plan, dated 02/08/24, revealed interventions including barrier cream/ointment after incontinence episodes as needed; small frequent shifts of body weight; turn and reposition as indicated; and elevate heels off the bed or use heel protectors. Review of Resident #40's Podiatry Note, authored by Podiatrist #982 and dated 04/01/24, revealed the resident's chief complaint was painful, dry skin on the bottoms of both feet for several months. The resident had painful, fissuring skin, plantar to the bilateral feet and diminished pedal pulses to the bilateral feet. The impression was xerosis (dry skin) to the bilateral plantar feet. The treatment included proper foot care and lac-hydrin 12% over the counter (OTC) cream (a hydrating cream) every morning to the bottom of both feet for six months. The podiatry visit was conducted in the facility during the morning of 04/01/24. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) from 04/01/24 through 05/23/24 revealed no documented evidence the lac-hydrin treatment to the resident's bilateral feet was completed per orders. Review of Resident #40's offsite Wound Care note, dated 04/01/24 at 1:00 P.M., revealed the resident was at risk for wounds to the right and left heels. Wound prevention interventions included padding and protecting the heels and free float from a pillow. Wound Care Treatments included to cleanse the left calcaneus with normal saline, apply skin prep to the peri-wound, apply an abdominal pad and kerlix every other day. Review of Resident #40's medication administration records (MARS) and treatment administration records (TARS) from 04/01/24 to 05/23/24 did not reveal evidence the wound intervention to the left calcaneus was completed as ordered. Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #40's Podiatry note, dated 05/13/24, revealed the resident had painful, dry skin on the bottom of both feet which was last assessed on 04/01/24. No new issues were identified and lac-hydrin continued. No pressure ulcers to the bilateral heels were identified. Review of Resident #40's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/13/24 for ammonium lactate cream 12% (lac-hydrin) topically to the bottom of both feet daily. Review of the MARS and TARS from 05/13/24 to 05/28/24 revealed the ammonium lactate was administered to Resident #40's bilateral feet except on 05/20/24 and 05/22/24 which were documented as the resident refused. Interview on 05/23/24 at 1:17 P.M. with Regional Registered Nurse (RRN) #979 indicated the facility did not have Resident #40's outside wound clinic visit note when he came back from the office visit and were unaware of the resident's new orders for the left heel dressing changes. Telephone interview on 05/28/24 at 1:36 P.M. with Wound Nurse #978 (outside wound clinic) indicated Resident #40 was in their office on 04/01/24 and again on 05/23/24 (per the resident's request). Wound Nurse #978 stated the resident's wound care dressing on his bilateral feet, when he came in for his wound care appointment on 05/23/24, was the same dressing their office placed on 04/01/24. She stated the facility did not change the dressings to the resident's bilateral feet. She stated Resident #40 had reported it was the same dressings that were applied from 04/01/24. Interview on 05/28/24 at 1:46 P.M. with Resident #40 indicated he could not move anything from the waist down and the wound clinic had cleaned his bilateral feet on 04/01/24. Resident #40 stated staff were supposed to do a treatment to his left foot, but they had not completed the treatment from 04/01/24 to 05/23/24 (after his second wound clinic visit) or administered the lac-hydrin cream to his bilateral feet from 04/01/24 to 05/13/24. He denied he had mentioned the dressings needed to be changed to the staff members . Interview on 05/29/24 at 2:40 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager #922 confirmed Resident #40's MARS and TARS did not have evidence the wound care treatment to the left calcaneus was completed from 04/01/24 to 05/23/24 or the lac-hydrin to the bilateral feet was completed from 04/01/24 to 05/13/24. Observations on 05/29/24 at 2:50 P.M. with facility Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #983 of Resident #40's wound care did not reveal any concerns. The resident had an air mattress and green prafo boots in place at the time of the observation. He was ordered to turn and reposition every two hours and offload heels. She stated the resident always had his prafo soft pressure prevention boots in place and he was non-compliant with care including turning and repositioning and showers. She stated the resident's bilateral feet wounds were vascular in nature (non-pressure) due to the resident's declining condition and extremely dry skin. Review of Wound NP #983's facility Wound Evaluation form dated 05/29/24 revealed the resident had a history of wounds to the bilateral heels that have remained intact with pink scar tissue. Preventative measures had been in place since the resident was initially evaluated in 11/22. The offloading boots were always worn and removed for hygiene care. The visit to the wound center on 05/23/24 revealed some concerns regarding the dressing from the original follow-up on 04/01/24 and had not been changed. Per podiatry documentation from both 04/01/24 and 05/13/24, the feet were examined and the dry, scaly area on the plantar aspect of the feet remained. The resident remained non-compliant with showers. Telephone interview on 05/30/24 at 8:57 A.M. with outside Wound Clinic RN #984 revealed Resident #40 reported his dressing on his bilateral feet were the same ones as 04/01/24. She stated the dressings looked old but were not dated or timed. She denied the resident had skin impairment to the right or left heels during the wound care visit on 04/01/24. Outside Wound Clinic RN #984 confirmed Resident #40 did not have pressure on either heel on 04/01/24 and had a very small open area on both heels on 05/23/24. Telephone interview on 05/30/24 at 9:32 A.M. with NP #985 revealed she assessed Resident #40 on 05/23/24 at the wound clinic and he had a lot of dry skin and poor hygiene. She felt all the new wounds identified on 05/23/24 were superficial and from cleaning the dry skin from the resident. She stated she was aware the resident was non-compliant with care including bathing and felt that was the major concern regarding the resident's wounds. NP #984 denied Resident #40's bilateral heel wounds were pressure and she felt the wounds were vascular in nature. She stated she felt these wound occurred when the outside wound clinic staff cleaned his legs and feet and peeled off all the dead skin. Review of Resident #40's outside Wound note dated 05/30/24 revealed the resident had a history of non-pressure wounds to the other part of left foot; chronic non-pressure ulcer of left heel and midfoot, right great toe, left great toe, chronic non pressure ulcer of right heel and midfoot, necrotizing vasculopathy, chronic multifocal osteomyelitis right humerus and sacrum. Review of the wound care policy revised 09/18/20 indicated wounds identified would be assessed initially and at least weekly thereafter, until healed. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00154752 and Complaint Numbers OH00154253, OH00154260 and OH00153809.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was administered pain medications as ordered. This affected one (Resident #11) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's hospital documentation revealed the resident had a left foot and ankle charcot neuroarthropathy with status post left ankle fusion and application for external fixator on 05/02/24. Further review of Resident #11's hospital documentation revealed discharge orders dated 05/15/24 for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) extended release (ER) 15 mg (milligram)12-hour tablet take one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for fourteen days; and hydromorphone (dilaudid narcotic pain tablet) 4 mg tablet take one tablet by mouth every four as needed for pain up to seven days. Review of Resident #11's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including charcot neuropathy status post left ankle fusion and application of external fixator on 05/02/24, pain in the left leg, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #11's Baseline Care Plan dated 05/15/24 revealed the resident would be monitored for adverse reactions to high-risk medications. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition, was frequently in pain and received non-medication interventions for pain. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/15/24 to monitor the pain level every shift; an order dated 05/15/24 for hydromorphone 4 mg every four hours for seven days (stop date 05/22/24); an order dated 05/15/24 (discontinued 05/21/24) for oxycodone ER 15 mg administer one tablet orally every twelve hours as needed for pain; and an order dated 05/21/24 to administer oxycodone ER 15 mg one tablet every shift. Review of Resident #11's medication administration records (MARS) from 05/15/24 to 05/22/24 revealed the resident was administered the hydromorphone narcotic pain medication on 05/15/24 at 11:35 P.M., 05/16/24 at 8:29 A.M., 05/17/24 at 9:49 A.M. and 05/18/24 at 3:48 P.M. Review of Resident #11's MARS from 05/15/24 to 05/22/24 revealed the resident was administered the oxycodone ER narcotic pain mediation on 05/16/24 at 5:02 A.M., 05/16/24 at 6:13 P.M., 0517/24 at 10:28 P.M., 05/18/24 at 9:26 P.M., 05/18/24 at 1:21 P.M., 05/20/24 at 5:03 A.M., 05/21/24 at 8:54 A.M. No concerns were identified. Review of Resident #11's medication administration records (MARS) and treatment administration records (TARS) from 05/15/24 to 05/22/24 revealed the resident's pain was monitored every shift with a pain level of 8 (one being least and 10 being the worst) on 05/15/24 during the nightshift, an 8 on 05/16/24 during the dayshift, a zero on 05/16/24 during the nightshift, a zero on 05/17/24 during the dayshift, a zero on 05/17/24 during the nightshift, a five on 05/18/24 during the dayshift, a 4 on 05/17/24 during the nightshift, a zero on 05/19/24 during the dayshift, a zero on 05/19/24 during the nightshift, a zero on 05/20/24 during the dayshift, a zero on 05/20/24 during the nightshift, a zero on 05/21/24 during the dayshift, a four on 05/21/24 during the nightshift and a zero on 05/22/24 during the dayshift. Review of Resident #11's progress note authored by Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #980 with a service date of 05/21/24 at 12:00 P.M. indicated the resident had a history non-pressure chronic ulcer of the unspecified heel and midfoot with bone involvement without evidence of necrosis . The oxycodone narcotic was transcribed incorrectly and corrected with nursing for every 12 hours. Telephone interview on 06/04/24 at 6:42 P.M. with CNP #980 stated she assessed Resident #11 on 05/21/24 and the resident reported his pain was not as controlled as it had been, and they were not administering his narcotic pain medications as ordered. NP #980 revealed she reviewed the medical record and determined the staff had transcribed the hospital discharge orders incorrectly and did not administer the oxycodone ER as ordered. She stated Resident #11 was to receive the oxycodone ER scheduled with hydromorphone for breakthrough pain. NP #980 indicated this was corrected on 05/21/24 and he went out to the hospital on [DATE]. Telephone interview on 06/10/24 at 6:31 P.M. with Resident #11 revealed the nursing staff did not administer his pain medications as ordered for the pain in his left leg. He stated they messed up his pain regimen. Review of the Medication Admin policy revised 05/01/10 revealed the facility should ensure authorized personnel, as determined by applicable law, administer medications according to times of administration and determined by the facility's pharmacy committee and/or physician prescriber. The facility was unable to provide a Pain Management Policy. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Numbers OH00154752, OH00154253, OH00153950 and OH00153809.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five perce...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). This affected one resident (Resident #33) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. A total of thirty medications were administered with two errors for a medication error rate of 6.66%. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, essential hypertension and depression. Review of Resident #33's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/23/24 for aspirin chewable 81 mg (milligrams) administer one tablet orally once per day; and an order dated 01/31/24 for vitamin c 500 mg administer two tablets orally once per day. Observation on 05/29/24 at 9:38 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #855 of Resident #33's medication administration revealed ten medications were administered including aspirin 81 mg enteric coated (EC) tablet and vitamin c 500 mg one tablet. Interview on 05/29/24 at 11:36 A.M. with RN #855 confirmed she administered aspirin EC and the order was for aspirin chewable and also administered one vitamin c tablet instead of two as ordered. Review of the Medication Administration policy revised 05/01/10 revealed the facility should ensure authorized personnel, as determined by applicable law, administer medications according to times of administration and determined by the facility's pharmacy committee and/or physician prescriber. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00154752 and Complaint Numbers OH00154253, OH00153950 and OH00153809.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care needs were adequately and timely met to decrea...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent residents from contacting the local fire and police department for care including routine care and assistance. This affected eleven residents (#4, #11, #12, #13, #19, #42, #51, #54, #75, #79, and #98) of 83 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1. Telephone interview on 05/30/24 at 9:48 A.M. with Detective #994 revealed ongoing concerns with calls coming into their police department from facility residents (from 01/10/24 through 05/30/24). He stated there were a lot of non-emergent calls from residents who wanted assistance from staff and staff were not answering the call lights timely. He stated this caused the residents to call 911 and request assistance unnecessarily. This included, but was not limited to at least 13 calls (not including calls for emergency squad or emergency medical services (EMS) involvement for hospitalizations: a. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and other behavioral disturbances. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order dated 07/28/23 to document pain every shift; and an order dated 07/28/23 for acetaminophen (Tylenol) 325 mg give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for pain (discontinued 01/16/24). During the interview, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 01/10/24 when Resident #4 called the police because she had pain in her leg and no staff answered her call light. Detective #994 indicated the resident reported she put her call light on and no staff answered her call light to address the pain in her leg. Review of a police report dated 01/10/24 at 11:20 P.M. revealed Resident #4 stated she had stomach pain. The resident was subsequently transported to the hospital due to pain. Review of Resident #4's medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) from 01/01/24 to 01/31/24 revealed staff failed to identify or document any complaints of pain for the resident for the dayshift or nightshift during this time period. There was no evidence the resident was administered any Tylenol for pain on 01/10/24. Review of Resident #4's progress notes from 01/09/24 to 01/10/24 revealed no evidence staff documented or assessed the resident for complaints of pain, including stomach pain during this time period. Review of Resident #4's progress note dated 01/10/24 at 9:30 P.M. indicated the resident called EMS and went to the hospital per her request. Review of Resident #4's progress notes dated 01/10/24 at 11:35 P.M. indicated an ambulance arrived at the facility and stated Resident #4 had called EMS for abdominal pain. The resident was transported to the hospital. Review of Resident #4's progress note dated 01/11/24 at 1:02 P.M. authored by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a call was placed to Resident #4's daughter to inform her that the nurse stated she had called her twice with no answer obtained to let her know the resident called EMS twice on 01/10/24. The first time she asked for the police to come and the second time for EMS to transfer her to the hospital for stomach pain. Review of Resident #4's hospital Internal Medicine History and Physical Examination dated 01/11/24 revealed the [AGE] year-old female who had a known history of old stroke and dementia recently moved to Ohio from California. She stated the SNF mistreated and neglected her; and she was sent to the hospital. She was admitted for further management. Review of Resident #4's hospital emergency room documentation dated 01/11/24 revealed the resident stated the nursing home had mistreated and neglected her. Review of Resident #4's progress note dated 01/13/24 indicated the resident returned to the facility on [DATE] at 9:15 P.M. via a stretcher. The resident had been admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Review of Resident #4's hospital Discharge Summary form dated 01/13/24 revealed the resident was admitted for COVID-19. The hospital documentation did not include evidence of stomach pain or leg pain. An attempted interview on 06/03/24 at 10:24 A.M. with Resident #4 revealed the resident was confused. During the interview, the resident could not remember calling the police department for anything. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police and emergency medical services for care including routine care and assistance. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:03 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility was aware multiple residents, including Resident #4 had called police or fire for resident care. b. Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, acute respiratory failure, and hemiplegia. Review of Resident #98's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. During the interview with Detective #994, the detective stated an incident occurred on 02/27/24 when Resident #98 called the police to report she needed help. Review of the police report dated 02/27/24 at 2:06 A.M. revealed Resident #98 called, and her speech was slow and lethargic. She stated she did not have an emergency and she was ok. The facility was contacted and stated the nurse would check on the resident. Review of Resident #98's progress notes did not reveal evidence the resident was assessed on 02/27/24 following the call to the police department. Record review revealed Resident #98 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a critically low hemoglobin. The family was updated on the resident's departure. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE] at 2:38 P.M. Interview on 06/11/24 at 8:12 A.M. with Resident #98's sister revealed the resident had been verbal and able to communicate in February 2024 but was currently in the hospital and non-verbal. During the interview, the resident's sister revealed she was unaware the resident had called the police in February 2024. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:03 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed she was aware multiple residents called the police for care while residents in the facility including Resident #98. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police for assistance. c. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance and anxiety. Review of Resident #19's care plans dated 03/23/23 revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function and impaired though processes related to dementia. Review of Resident #19's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 03/05/24 when Resident #19 called police to report he could not get (staff) assistance when he had pushed his call light for help. The detective indicated a second incident occurred on 03/06/24 when Resident #19 called police because he could not get (staff) assistance when he had pushed his call light for help. Review of the police report dated 03/05/24 at 11:27 A.M. revealed Resident #19 stated he was unable to get help and needed a bed pan. The dispatcher called the facility and the phone line was busy. The dispatcher called the facility again and the resident was assisted. Review of the police report dated 03/06/24 at 10:28 A.M. revealed the resident was unable to get (staff) help and was vomiting. Staff were advised and checking with the manager if the resident should be sent to the hospital. A squad was requested due to a change in Resident #19's mental status and the resident was transported to the veteran's hospital. Review of Resident #19's progress note dated 03/07/24 at 1:11 P.M. revealed on 03/06/24 at 11:00 A.M. prior to transport to the hospital, the resident called the police and stated he could not stand up because of pain and the ceiling was spinning. The note indicated the resident was administered Tramadol (narcotic) for pain and stated he felt better immediately. The police arrived and asked the resident if he wanted to go to the hospital and he said yes and the ambulance company was called to transport the resident to the veteran's hospital. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:18 P.M. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:03 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed she was aware multiple residents called the police and fire department for assistance including Resident #19. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police for assistance. d. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, essential hypertension and insomnia. Review of Resident #51's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 03/08/24 when Resident #51 called police to report no staff answered her call light for basic care. Interview on 06/06/24 at 9:46 A.M. with the Administrator and DON revealed Resident #51 had not called the police/fire on 03/08/24 but rather it was Resident #51's friend because the friend had not heard from the resident in a while. Review of the police report dated 03/08/24 at 8:44 A.M. revealed the caller requested a welfare check on Resident #51 who was at the facility. She stated the resident did not receive food and basic care and no one answered the resident's call light. The report revealed the police officer had observed a nurse exiting the resident's room following breakfast. The resident reported to the police officer that she did not have her oxygen or food. The DON was in the room with the police officer and verified the resident's oxygen was hooked up and working properly and the resident's food was sitting in front of her. The resident refused hospitalization and the police officer exited the facility. Interview on 06/06/24 at 10:01 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #837 revealed she remembered the police responding to Resident #51 but could not remember the exact date. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police for assistance. e. Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #79's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition and had impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 03/29/24 when Resident #79 called the police to report a staff member abused him by putting their weight on the resident during care. Review of the police report dated 03/29/24 at 6:05 A.M. revealed Resident #79 had reported the nurse was abusing him by putting all her weight onto him when she leans into the bed. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police related to reports of abuse without staff knowledge. f. Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, diabetes, depression and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #42's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. During the interview, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 04/14/24 when Resident #42 called the police to report his wallet had been stolen. There was no evidence the resident had first reported this to facility staff or that staff were investigating the incident. Review of Resident #42's witness statement authored by the Administrator on 04/08/24 at 5:00 P.M. revealed the resident indicated he last saw his wallet about a year ago at the movies. He stated he had always kept his wallet in his back pocket which had a picture of himself and $23.00. The resident denied credit cards were missing and denied he wanted to file and police report. Telephone interview on 06/11/24 at 8:05 A.M. with Resident #42's sister revealed the resident went to an appointment approximately two months ago and his wallet was missing. She stated the wallet contained a social security card, driver's license and bank card. When questioned, she stated no one had attempted to use the bank card but the facility could not find the wallet. She replaced the bank card. Interview on 06/12/24 at 8:56 A.M. with Resident #42 and the resident stated his wallet was missing. He could not report what was in the wallet or where he thought the wallet might have went. He stated his sister replaced his identification card and he was not missing any money. Record review revealed no evidence of interventions or measures being implemented to ensure the resident's care needs were adequately and timely met to decrease/prevent the resident from contacting the local police related to reports of theft/misappropriation without staff knowledge. g. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease and anemia. Review of Resident #54's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed an incident occurred on 04/17/24 when Resident #54 called the police to report missing money. Review of Resident #54's witness statement dated 04/17/24 revealed the STNA overheard the resident having a conversation about money with his son and nephew and the son and nephew bought snacks in for the resident. No money was observed. Interview on 06/12/24 at 8:58 A.M. with Resident #54 who stated he put $20.00 in his drawer and reported it as stolen. He stated the facility reimbursed him for the $20.00 and then he found the money in the drawer stuck in the back of the drawer and the cabinet. h. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed the police were called on 04/18/24 by Resident #12's daughter to report an STNA intentionally pulled out the PEG tube. Review of Resident #12's nursing progress note dated 04/18/24 at 4:56 A.M. indicated the resident's needs could not be met in the facility at the time due to PEG tube issues. The PEG was pulled out by the resident. The resident was transferred to the emergency room. The resident had been prepared for transfer. The physician was notified and the resident was discharged at 11:00 P.M. with the face sheet, medication list and code status. i. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain in the left leg, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #11's MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. During the interview with the detective, Detective #994 revealed Resident #11 called the police and ambulance due to a nose bleeding and bleeding in his mouth . Review of Resident #11's MARS and TARS from 05/15/24 to 05/22/24 revealed the staff documented the resident's INR result on 05/20/24 on dayshift as not applicable (NA), on 05/20/24 on nightshift as 1.9; on 05/21/24 on dayshift as NA; on 05/20/24 on nightshift as 1.9; on 05/21/24 on dayshift as NA; on 05/21/24 on nightshift as 4.9; and on 05/22/24 on dayshift as 4.9. Review of Resident #11's Squad Report form dated 05/22/24 at 8:48 P.M. revealed the male who was bleeding from his mouth and nose. The resident stated he had been bleeding from his nose and gums all day. He stated he was on a blood thinner and was taken by stretcher to the hospital. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:03 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed she was aware multiple residents had called the police and fire department including Resident #11. Telephone interview on 06/10/24 at 6:31 P.M. with Resident #11 with the Administrator and RRN #979 present revealed on 05/22/24, he had reported to RN #812 between 2:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. that his nose and gums were bleeding. Resident #11 stated RN #812 assessed his mouth and stated that he must have broken one of his teeth which caused bleeding. She provided a saltwater rinse for the resident. Resident #11 stated between 6:30 P.M. and 6:34 P.M., RN #812 came in and told him that his PT/INR was 4.9 and that his Coumadin was to be held. He stated at that point, he called his friends in the fire department and decided to call EMS for transport to the hospital. He stated he was hospitalized from [DATE] to 06/03/24 to get his INR stabilized which included the administration of Vitamin K shots. The resident indicated the hospitalization would not have been necessary if the nursing staff had monitored his lab work closely and reported the abnormal labs to the physician before giving him his Coumadin. 2. Interview on 06/04/24 at 8:31 A.M. with Assistant Fire Department Chief #995 revealed the fire department had received multiple phone calls from residents at the facility. During the interview Chief #995 provided examples including on 05/20/24 when three different residents called their office to report care concerns. Calls were received from Resident #75 on 05/20/24 at 10:12 A.M. who stated she requested a breathing treatment, and the nurse did not bring it, Resident #13 on 05/20/24 at 11:37 A.M. who stated staff were not answering his call light and Resident #19 on 05/20/24 at 2:15 P.M. who needed to use the bathroom and no staff answered his call light. Interview on 06/05/24 at 1:20 P.M. with Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #979 revealed she believed the facility had investigated concerns with residents calling the police and fire departments and the facility attempted to determine the root cause of the resident complaints to the police and fire departments on 04/30/24. She revealed the facility tried to determine which staff members might be involved, what shift might be involved, days of the week involved and why the residents called the police for fire departments. However, Regional RN #979 revealed the facility could not determine a pattern. She stated the residents were interviewed, staff were educated, and a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was implemented to try to mitigate residents calling the police or fire unnecessarily. Interview on 06/05/24 at 2:03 P.M. with the Administrator she began employment at the facility on 05/20/24. The Administrator revealed she was currently attempting to schedule an appointment (call placed on 06/03/24) with the police and fire departments to introduce herself and to mitigate concerns. There was no evidence provided to confirm the appointments were scheduled for the meeting between the Administrator and the fire department or police department as of this date. An additional interview on 06/06/24 at 10:19 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility had been unable to specifically identify a root cause regarding the increase in resident phone calls directly to the police and fire departments for routine care and assistance. The Administrator revealed she believed the resident phone calls to the fire/police departments had decreased from 04/28/24 to the current date because of the facility added weekend supervisory position. The Administrator revealed the three resident phone calls to the fire department on 05/20/24 were on a Monday during the dayshift and she was present in the building as was the DON. Telephone interview on 06/14/24 at 8:10 A.M. with Fire Department #995 indicated approximately two-thirds of their calls to the facility were from residents who said they could not obtain assistance. He stated from 06/01/24 to 06/14/24 multiple residents had called for assistance with care including on 06/09/24 at 2:47 P.M. Resident #53 stated no one would answer his light to take him to the bathroom. When the squad arrived, the nurse was taking the resident to the bathroom. Fire Department #995 indicated on 06/11/24 at 6:14 A.M. Resident #19 stated he had back pain and no one responded to his call light. When the squad had arrived, no nursing staff were aware the resident had called 911. Telephone interview on 06/14/24 at 8:18 A.M. with Fire Department #311 indicated he had responded to Resident #11's 911 call for assistance on 05/22/24 and their squad was on scene for 21 minutes. He stated he had observed Resident #11 with blood towels on the table, blood tissues, blood in cups and blood on the front of the resident. He stated three staff members were at the end of the hall laughing and talking on their cell phones while the squad team were in the building and no staff were in the room helping Resident #11. Further interview revealed he had asked the staff members for a Hoyer mechanical lift to get the resident on a cot for transport and no staff members brought the Hoyer mechanical lift or even talked to them and/or assessed the resident while the squad was in the room. He stated the room was in deplorable condition with bloody towels/tissues and the floor was sticky. Fire Department #311 indicated the entire 21 minutes the squad was in the building, not one staff member had come in to assess, monitor or assist Resident #11 in any way. Fire Department #311 indicated he asked for Resident #11's resident information and the nurse just handed him the form without talking to the squad about the resident or resident's care. He stated this was just one example and many residents from this facility called for assistance because the staff did not answer the call lights or respond to their requests for assistance. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00154261, OH00153879 and OH00153809.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets were on duty and provided the necessary access to the res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets were on duty and provided the necessary access to the resident's electronic health record to ensure medications were administered in a timely manner. This affected 15 residents (#5, #12, #29, #49, #53, #54, #55, #58, #59, #64, #67, #71, #72, #78 and #84's) assigned to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #401 on 06/04/24. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedule for 06/04/24 for the 7:00 P.M. to 06/05/24 7:00 A.M. shift revealed four licensed nurses were scheduled for 83 total residents. LPN #897 was noted to report off for the shift on 06/04/24 at 6:30 P.M. The facility contacted a staffing agency, and LPN #401 reported to work (to replace LPN #897), arriving to the facility at 7:00 P.M. The LPN was assigned to provide care for twenty residents including Residents #3, #4, #5, #12, #29, #49, #53, #54, #55, #58, #59, #64, #66, #67, #68, #71, #72, #73, #78 and #84 on the 100/200 split. The 100/200 split included ten residents, Resident #4, #29, #49, #59, #64, #66, #67, #71 and #73 with diagnosis of dementia/cognitive impairment. Review of resident records on the 100/200 unit revealed 19 residents reside on the 100/200 split including Residents #3, #4, #5, #12, #29, #49, #53, #54, #55, #58, #59, #64, #66, #67, #68, #71, #72, #78 and #84's. Further review of Residents #3, #4, #5, #12, #29, #49, #53, #54, #55, #58, #59, #64, #66, #67, #68, #71, #72, #78 and #84's medical records, medication administration records (MARS) and treatment administration records (TARS) revealed Residents #4 and #66 were not scheduled nighttime medications and Residents #3 and #68 had received the medications as ordered on 06/04/24. Telephone interview on 06/10/24 at 12:27 P.M. with LPN #401 confirmed she worked on 06/04/24 during the 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift on the 100/200 unit split with approximately 19 residents. During the interview the LPN revealed she did not receive login information timely for the facility electronic health records (EHR) and was unable to start her medication administration pass until around 10:00 P.M. (for medications scheduled to be administered between 7:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. The LPN verified the medications were administered on this date due to the staffing issue and lack of access to the facility EHR system. a. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered between 7:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. which included Atorvastatin (for high cholesterol) and Travoprost eye drops. Record review revealed the medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:10 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. b. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications including Atorvastatin, Buspirone (antianxiety), Cyclobenaprine (treats muscle spasms), Docusate Sodium, Hydralazine, Hydroxyzine (antianxiety), Lactulose, Levetiracetam (for seizures), Paroxetine (antidepressant) and a stool softener which were scheduled to be administered between 7:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:16 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. Interview on 05/28/24 at 8:23 A.M. with Resident #12's family member indicated the resident was not provided timely care during the nightshift and she felt there was not enough staff in the building to provide care to the resident. c. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident had physician order for the anti-coagulant medication, Eliquis scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. The medication was administered on 06/05/24 at 2:18 A.M. The medication was not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. d. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Atorvastatin and Remeron. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:24 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. e. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered between 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included an albuterol inhaler, Atorvastatin, Divalproex (anticonvulsant), Pepcid, Hydroxyzine, Levetiracetam and Methocarbamol (treats muscle spasms). The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:26 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system . f. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Baclofen, Eliquis, Hydralazine (high blood pressure medication) Lantus insulin and Metoprolol. The medications were not administered as ordered and scheduled between 7:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. due to the LPN not having proper access to the facility record system. g. Interview on 06/12/24 at 8:50 A.M. with Resident #55 revealed there was not enough staff and staff kept administering her medications late. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Atorvastatin, Baclofen, Buspirone, Divalproex, Eliquis, Iron, Melatonin, Metoprolol, Symbicort inhaler and stool softener. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:29 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. h. Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Atorvastatin, Iron, Gabapentin, Hydralazine, Lantus insulin, Melatonin and Oxycodone. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:32 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system . i. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Atorvastatin, Lantaprost eye drops and Melatonin. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:35 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. j. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Tylenol, Mirtazapine and Trazodone. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:34 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. k. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Tylenol, Coreg (anti-hypertensive) and eye drops. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:36 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. l. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Baclofen, Keppra (an anti-convulsant), Lactulose, Norvasc, Miralax, Propranolol (an antihypertensive), Senna and Vimpat (anti-epileptic). The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:40 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. Telephone interview on 05/28/24 at 11:49 A.M. with Resident #71's power-of-attorney (POA) confirmed she was in the building on 06/04/24 and the resident had received the nighttime medications after midnight. She stated she believed this was because of lack of staffing in the building. m. Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed the resident had physician orders for medications scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Aricept, Lantaprost eye drops and Lantus insulin. The medications were administered on 06/05/24 at 2:42 A.M. The medications were not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system . n. Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed the resident had a physician order for medication scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Miralax. The medication was administered on 06/05/24 at 2:43 A.M. The medication was not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. o. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed the resident had a physician order for medication scheduled to be administered from 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. which included Metoprolol. The medication was administered on 06/05/24 at 2:45 A.M. The medication was not administered as ordered due to LPN #401 not having proper access to the facility record system. Interview on 05/23/24 at 9:34 A.M. with Resident #26 indicated the staff did not check on her during the nightshift. She felt there were not enough staff to provide timely resident care. Telephone interview on 05/28/24 at 9:27 A.M. with Resident #26's power-of-attorney revealed the resident was not checked on during the nightshift and she felt staffing was an issue. Interview on 06/12/24 at 9:21 A.M. with RN Supervisor #922 confirmed LPN #401 did not administer Resident #5, #12, #29, #49, #53, #54, #55, #58, #59, #64, #67, #71, #72, #78 and #84's medications as ordered on 06/04/24 because the nurse did not have computer access to administer these medications as ordered. Telephone interview on 06/14/24 at 8:10 A.M. with Assistant Fire Department #995 revealed residents called their department on multiple dates due to the staff not answering their call lights to provide care. Telephone interview on 06/14/24 at 8:18 A.M. with Fire Department #311 indicated he felt the facility was short staffed. He stated he had responded to multiple calls at the facility. He stated on 05/22/24 he went to the facility to respond to Resident #11's call for assistance and he had observed three staff members at the end of the hall laughing and talking on their telephones for the entire 21 minutes he was in the building. He stated not one staff member was observed to come into Resident #11's room while their team was there and assist the resident or ask the resident if he needed anything. Additionally, he stated his team was called to the building on multiple occasions to respond to resident's calling and asking for assistance from their department and when the team arrived in the facility and walked down the hall, multiple residents would see their team and yell out for assistance because the staff members were not answering their call lights and responding to the resident requests. Review of the undated staffing policy named Policy revealed each nursing home shall have sufficient direct care staff on each shift to meet the needs of the residents in an appropriate and timely manner and have the following individuals provide a minimum of two and one-half hours of direct care and services per day including nurse aides, RN's and LPNs. Review of the Medication Administration policy revised 05/01/24 revealed the facility should ensure authorized personnel, as determined by applicable law, administer medications according to the times of administration as determined by the facility's pharmacy committee and/or physician prescriber. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00154752 and Complaint Numbers OH00154261, OH00154253, OH00153953, OH00153950, OH00153879 and OH00153809.
Mar 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely assistance getting dressed and hair shampooed per physician ord...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely assistance getting dressed and hair shampooed per physician order. This affected one resident (#60) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/21/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with (acute) exacerbation, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the care plan revised 03/10/24 revealed Resident #60 required staff assistance with ADL functions, resident was generally continent of bowel and bladder, resident required staff assistance with toileting, hygiene, and transfers. Review of the physician orders for March 2023 revealed an active order for prescription ketoconazole shampoo 2%. Special Instructions: apply topically to scalp one time a week on Mondays at 12:30 P.M. Review of medication administration record (MAR) for March 2024 revealed the order had been signed off as completed per order. Review of the bath/shower sheets for Resident #60 dated 02/24/24 through 03/20/24 did not indicate if the resident hair was shampooed. Interview on 03/19/24 at 11:50 A.M. with Resident #60 stated he had to wait a long time to be cleaned up and dressed. Resident #60 stated he had been waiting since 8:00 A.M. Resident #60 stated State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #301 had stopped in his room about an hour ago and stated she had one shower to do before getting to him. Resident stated he had issues getting assistance with his ADL including getting his hair shampooed as ordered. Resident #60 stated he only received his hair shampooed once in the past three weeks. Observation at this time of Resident #60 revealed he was sitting in his wheelchair, with only a sheet covering him, and hair appeared unkempt. Interview on 03/19/24 at 12:08 P.M. with STNA #301 stated it was her first day at the facility but stated he can do a lot on his own but was a one person assist. STNA #301 stated she had not had a chance to get to him yet and had been running around doing patient care. Follow-up interview on 03/21/24 at 9:48 A.M. with Resident #60 revealed he could not recall exactly when he his hair was shampooed but it had been early in the month. Resident #60 stated this past Tuesday, 03/19/24 an aide he had not seen before shampooed his hair. Resident #60 stated his hair had been shampooed twice since he had been at the facility. Interview on 03/21/24 at 10:46 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #219 stated a lot of times he had to help Resident #60 get up and dressed because he didn't always get the assistance in a timely manner. LPN #219 stated he was not sure if the aides washed Resident #60's on shower days or if it was getting done per physician order. Review of the MAR for March 2024 with LPN #219 verified he had signed off on 03/04/24 and 03/18/24 that Resident #60 hair was shampooed per physician order. LPN #219 stated he assumed the aides shampooed the resident's hair. Interview on 03/21/24 at 10:56 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #300 stated Resident #60's hair could be shampooed during bed baths and when given a shower. RN #300 stated technically since the shampoo was a medication, the nurse should be doing it or making sure it was on the resident's hair and the aides could rinse it out. Review of the MAR for March 2024 with RN #300 verified she signed off on the order as completed on 03/11/24 and then stated she did not recall. Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, revised 08/12/20, revealed provision of ADL (activities of daily living) care will include but not limited to staff to provide care in the following areas: this shall include, but not be limited to, eating, toileting, ambulation, bathing, dressing, and transferring.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #85's neuro checks w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #85's neuro checks were completed as scheduled after a fall. This affected one resident (#85) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the prostate and end stage renal disease. Resident #85 passed away at the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #85's progress notes dated [DATE] at 3:33 P.M. included Resident #85 was alert and oriented. Resident #85's advance directive was a full code, and Resident #85 was on peritoneal dialysis. Resident #85 required a mechanical lift for transfers and required assistance with toileting, bathing, and bed mobility. Review of Resident #85's progress notes dated [DATE] at 10:53 P.M. revealed Resident #85 was observed lying in the prone position on the floor in his room close to his bed. A neuro check assessment was completed and were within normal limits, blood pressure was 98/62, heart rate 68, temperature 97.6, oxygen saturation 97 percent, and respirations were 18 per minute on room air. Resident #85 denied complaints of pain and denied hitting his head. Resident #85 was assisted back to bed with a mechanical lift and three staff members. Resident #85's wife, his Certified Nurse Practitioner, and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified. Neuro checks were initiated, and Resident #85 was educated to use his call bell for help. Staff would continue to monitor the resident closely. Review of Resident #85's neuro checks revealed neuro checks were initiated on [DATE] and were completed every 15 minutes times four and were completed every 30 minutes times four. Further review revealed neuro checks were to be completed every one-hour times four. Neuro checks were documented on [DATE] at 2:15 A.M. and on [DATE] at 3:15 A.M. and revealed Resident #85 was awake, alert, able to verbalize needs, moved extremities equally and pupils were equal and reactive. Resident #85 was scheduled to have neuro checks completed on [DATE] at 4:15 A.M., but there was no evidence the neuro checks were completed, and further review revealed no further neuro checks were completed until Resident #85 was found on [DATE] at 5:00 A.M. and was cold to touch with the absence of vital signs and pupil response. Review of Resident #85's progress notes dated [DATE] at 6:30 A.M. included an unidentified State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) and nurse reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #236 at 5:00 A.M. that Resident #85 was cold to touch with the absence of vital signs and pupil response. Upon entering Resident #85's room, LPN #85 initiated a code. CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) was started and 911 was called. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived at 5:15 A.M. and paramedics pronounced Resident #85 DOA (dead on arrival) at 5:20 A.M. Review of Resident #85's care plan dated [DATE] included Resident #85 was at risk for falls characterized by a history of falls, injury. Resident #85 would minimize risks for falls, minimize injuries related to falls through the next review target date on [DATE]. Interventions included implementing preventative fall interventions, devices; maintaining the call bell within reach; and maintaining the resident's needed items within reach. Review of Resident #85's Certificate of Death dated [DATE] included the immediate cause of death was End Stage Renal Disease, the manner of death was natural causes, and there was no autopsy performed. Interview on [DATE] at 3:00 P.M. of Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) #286 and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #85 had a fall on [DATE] and Resident #85's neuro checks were scheduled to be completed on [DATE] at 4:15 A.M. and there was no documented evidence the neuro checks were done. RDCS #286 confirmed no further neuro checks were completed on [DATE] after 3:15 A.M. until Resident #85 was found on [DATE] at 5:00 A.M. cold to touch with the absence of vital signs and pupil response. RDCS #286 stated Resident #85 was a very sick man and was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the facility policy titled Neurological Checks Policy, revised [DATE], included neurological checks were indicated to monitor for potential irregularities in neurological status in the event of known or unknown head trauma as the result of a resident event, change in resident condition or physician's order. An initial neurological check would be performed by a licensed clinician for all residents who have sustained a witnessed, unwitnessed, alleged, reported, or suspected head trauma following an unusual occurrence or change in resident neurological condition. Upon initiation of the schedule or as triggered by a qualifying event, the neurological check assessment in the electronic health record or on paper would be initiated to conduct periodic checks and to document the results of the neurological checks. Unless otherwise ordered by the physician, the frequency of neurological assessments would be every 15 minutes times four, then every 30 minutes times four, then every one-hour times three, then every four hours times two, then every eight hours times two. Elements to be assessed included level of consciousness, mental status, vital signs including blood pressure, pulse, respirations, and movement, coordination.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 01/18/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, ulcerative colitis, heart failure, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition, no behaviors, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 01/19/23 revealed Resident #13 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Interventions included assisting with activities of daily living, dressing, grooming, toileting, feeding, oral care. Resident #13 required assistance of one staff with toileting. Interview on 03/19/24 at 9:40 A.M. with Resident #13 stated she had a bowel movement (BM) and had been waiting 15 minutes so far for staff to change her. Follow-up interview on 03/19/24 at 9:51 A.M. with Resident #13 revealed she had initially used her call light to inform the staff she needed to be changed and had been waiting. The odor of BM was present through the N95 facemask while in resident's room. Staff were observed in the hall. Observation on 03/19/24 at 9:53 A.M. observed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #202 enter Resident #13's room and leave. Observation on 03/19/24 at 10:00 A.M. observed Resident #13's call light turned on and at 10:01 A.M. observed staff answered call light then left out of room turning call light off. Observation on 03/19/24 10:15 A.M. observed Resident #13's call light turned back on and at 10:16 A.M. a nurse entered the room and exited Resident #13's room turning off the call light. Observation on 03/19/24 at 10:19 A.M. STNA #301 and another staff member enter Resident #13's room and at 10:22 A.M. both staff exited the resident's room. Observation on 03/19/24 at 10:30 A.M. STNA #301 and another staff member entered Resident #13's room with towels and closed the door. Interview on 03/19/24 at 11:00 A.M. with STNA #202 stated when she entered Resident #13's room at 9:53 A.M., Resident #13 told her she needed to be changed. STNA #202 stated she then told Resident #202's aide, STNA #301, that Resident #13 needed to be changed and that she would assist her. Interview on 03/19/24 at 12:08 P.M. with STNA #301 stated it was her first day at the facility and she had been running around doing patient care. STNA #301 stated when she entered Resident #13's room she told her she wanted a shower. STNA #301 stated when she changed Resident #13's brief, she had a little, liquidy BM in her brief. Review of the facility policy titled Incontinent Resident Care, revised January 2014, revealed incontinent residents will be cared for by nursing personnel to ensure adequate skin care, control odor and provide personnel hygiene.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during medication administration for Resident's #9, #57 and #64 and failed to ensure Resident #31's soiled linens and soiled incontinence brief was not placed on the floor during incontinence care. This affected three residents (#9, #57 and #64) out of seven reviewed for medication administration and one resident (#31) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/26/23 with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, pain in the right and left knees, and hypertension. Observation on 03/21/24 at 8:56 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #285 revealed she was standing at the medication cart preparing Resident #57's medications for administration. RN #285 finished preparing Resident #57's medications, placed them in a small plastic cup and walked in Resident #57's room. RN #285 took Resident #57's blood pressure then administered the medications. After administering Resident #57's medications, RN #285 walked out of the room and back to the medication cart. RN #285 did not wash her hands or use hand sanitizer before leaving Resident #57's room or after she returned to the medication cart. 2. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/22 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Observation on 03/21/24 at 9:09 A.M. of RN #285 revealed she was standing at the medication cart preparing Resident #9's medications for administration. RN #285 finished preparing Resident #9's medications, placed them in a small plastic cup and walked into Resident #9's room without using hand sanitizer or washing her hands. RN #285 administered Resident #9's medications and walked out of the room and back to the medication cart without using hand sanitizer or washing her hands. 3. Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/22 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease, stage three, and hypertension. Observation on 03/21/24 at 9:14 A.M. of RN #285 at 9:14 A.M. revealed she walked into Resident #64's room without using hand sanitizer or washing her hands. RN #285 took Resident #64's blood pressure and left the room without using hand sanitizer or washing her hands. Interview on 03/21/24 at 9:14 A.M. of RN #285 confirmed she did not use hand sanitizer or wash her hands during medication administration to Resident's #57 and #9 and did not use hand sanitizer or wash her hands before or after taking Resident #64's blood pressure. RN #285 stated you got me. 4. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/24 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #31 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Observation on 03/21/24 at 8:34 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #216 revealed he was working in the role of a State Tested Nursing Assistant and was preparing to provide incontinence care for Resident #31. LPN #216 stated Resident #31 had a bowel movement, needed her incontinence brief changed, and she needed to be dressed and assisted to the chair in her room so she could eat breakfast. Observation of Resident #31 revealed she was lying in bed on her left side and a pungent odor of bowel movement was noted. LPN #31 provided Resident #31's incontinence care and when her incontinence brief was removed a large brown bowel movement could be seen. Further observation revealed LPN #216 placed the soiled incontinence brief with a large amount of feces in it on the floor and placed the soiled washcloth and towel used during incontinence care on the floor beside the incontinence brief. LPN #216 stated he would clean it up later. LPN #216 did not remove the soiled gloves used for incontinence care and picked up Resident #31's clean pants and shirt and placed them on a chair in the room. Observation revealed LPN #216 took his soiled gloves off, did not wash his hands or use hand sanitizer and donned clean disposable gloves. LPN #216 proceeded to dress Resident #31 in a clean shirt and pants and assisted her to a chair. LPN #216 did not remove his gloves, use hand sanitizer, or wash his hands, picked up Resident #31's breakfast tray, placed it on a table in front of her and removed the lids from her breakfast items. LPN #216 removed his gloves, washed his hands, then returned to Resident #31, and finished assisting her with her meal tray. There was a pungent odor of bowel movement noted in the room, and when asked about the soiled incontinence brief and washcloth lying on the floor, LPN #216 stated he would clean them up after Resident #31 ate her breakfast. Review of the facility policy titled Incontinent Resident Care, revised 01/2014, included incontinent residents would be cared for by nursing personnel to ensure adequate skin care, control odor and provide personal hygiene. Further review included to remove soiled clothing and do not put linen on the floor, dispose of linen per exposure control policy and to wash hands.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit areas, failed to ensure staff wore hairne...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and nursing unit areas, failed to ensure staff wore hairnets while in the kitchen, and failed to ensure scoops were not stored in the containers with the food items. This had the potential to affect all residents except three residents (#48, #66, and #69) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 03/18/24 from 6:15 P.M. through 6:27 P.M. during the brief kitchen tour revealed three dietary staff observed in the kitchen cleaning without wearing hair restraints. Attempt to wash hands at the hand washing sink across from the dry storage area revealed the hot water was not working. Attempt to wash hands at the handwashing sink near the dish machine, and the hot water was also not working. Observed small white Styrofoam bowls stored in the bulk cereal containers for the cheerios, fruit loops, and rice Krispies. Observed in the bulk flour was a large plastic cup with measurements that was stored in the container with the flour. The clear lids of the bulk sugar, flour, and breadcrumbs had various food crumbs, food debris, and appeared sticky. Interview on 03/18/24 between 6:15 P.M. and 6:27 P.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #212 verified the above findings. DC #212 stated the sink near the dry storage was leaking so maintenance shut the hot water valve off and must have turned the hot water valve off at the sink near the dish machine as well. DC #212 stated they would use the other sinks to wash their hands that were not indicated as handwashing sinks. DC #212 stated they weren't wearing hairnets because they were able to take them off after meal service to clean. Observation on 03/20/24 at 3:27 P.M. of the nursing unit refrigerators with Regional Registered Dietitian (RRD) #302. RRD #302 stated the servery on the 400/500 hall was closed. Observation of the 400/500 hall servery revealed the refrigerator empty and within normal temperature but had dried spillage on the bottom portion of the inside of the refrigerator. RRD #302 verified the observation. Observation on 03/20/24 at 3:30 P.M. of the 300-hall nursing unit servery revealed a dried spillage on the inside bottom of the refrigerator and a moderate amount of dried food debris/spillage on the grills of the shelves. Observation of the freezer revealed various spillage, a cup of slushy with no name or label, turned on its side and an open Twix candy bar. Observation of the microwave revealed minimal dried spillage and food debris inside of the microwave, but the silver shelf that the microwave sat on had a large dried black/brownish substance with food debris. Interview at this time with RRD #302 verified the observation. Observation on 03/20/24 at 4:35 P.M. of tray line temperatures revealed the food was observed on the steamtable. Observed a large, black fan on and blowing toward the food on the steam table that was dirty with dust. Interview at this time with RRD #302 verified the observation. Review of the list of residents with their diet orders provided by the facility revealed three residents (#48, #66, and #69) who received nothing by mouth. Review of the facility policy titled Food Preparation Area Policy, revised 06/07/21, revealed the community facility will maintain a clean, sanitary, and safe food preparation area. Food preparation staff must use hand washing facilities, which will be available and will include hot and cold water with a soap dispenser, disposable towel rack, and trash can with step to open lid. Hand washing sinks will be separate from ware washing sinks and will be located near food preparation and clean dish areas. Hand washing sinks will not be used for food preparation. Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Dry Food Policy, revised 03/09/24, revealed bulk food scoops are not to be stored in bins but are kept covered and protected near containers. Scoops are to be washed, sanitized, and dried on a routine basis.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and staff interview the facility did not ensure the laundry room was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and staff interview the facility did not ensure the laundry room was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 03/19/24 at 4:14 P.M. revealed accumulated lint under each of the three dryers. There was a substantial amount of lint coating the surfaces in the room behind the dryers. The eye wash station sink was coated with white substance. The washing machines were coated in a white fuzzy substance that adhered to the surface. The wall behind the washing machines was cracked open along the baseboard. Interview on 03/19/24 at 4:19 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Services #286 verified these findings.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered. This affected three (Resident #7, #8, #9) of eight residents who required insulin. The census was 75. Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered. This affected three (Resident #7, #8, #9) of eight residents who required insulin. The census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/22/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/17/23, revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Review of the physician order dated 06/23/23 revealed Resident #7 was ordered Novolog 100 units/milliliters per sliding scale before meals. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) dated August 2023 revealed no documentation indicating Resident #7's blood sugar was checked, or insulin was administered the mornings of 08/05/23 or 08/06/23. Review of the nurse progress note dated 08/06/23 timed 12:19 P.M. and 12:20 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #102 documented Resident #7 did not receive the morning dose of Novolog 100 units per sliding scale on 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 10/24/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/19/23, revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition. Review of physician order dated 10/25/22 revealed Resident #8 was ordered Lispro solution six units one time a day with breakfast. Review of the MAR dated August 2023 revealed no documentation indicating Resident #8's blood sugar was checked, or insulin was administered with breakfast on 08/05/23 or 08/06/23. Review of the nurse progress note dated 08/06/23 at 1:59 P.M. revealed RN #102 documented Resident #8 did not receive the morning dose of Lispro six units with breakfast on 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/02/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction and type two diabetes with other circulatory complications. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/11/23, revealed Resident #9 had impaired cognition. Review of physician order dated 07/30/23 revealed Resident #9 was ordered Novolog 100 unit/milliliter per sliding scale. Review of the MAR dated August 2023 revealed no documentation indicating Resident #9's blood sugar was checked, or insulin was administered the mornings of 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. Review of the nurse progress note dated 08/06/23 at 11:17 A.M. revealed RN #102 documented Resident #9 did not receive the morning dose of Novolog 100 units per sliding scale on 08/06/23. Interview on 09/06/23 at 11:52 A.M. with the Director of Nursing and Corporate Nurse verified the above findings. They indicated all the residents on the 400/500 hallway received their oral medications but Residents #7, #8 and #9 did not have their blood sugars checked and did not receive their insulin on the mornings of 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. Interview on 09/06/23 at 4:15 P.M. with RN #102 revealed residents were stating, upon her arrival to work on 08/06/23 that they did not receive their morning medications. RN #102 verified blood sugars were not checked and insulin was not administered as ordered for Residents #7, #8, and #9 on 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00145645.
Mar 2023 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff were provided education and Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff were provided education and Resident #53 was provided adequate treatment and monitoring for a potentially life threatening medical condition. Actual Harm occurred on 02/18/23 at 1:00 A.M. when Resident #53 developed a severe, throbbing headache, was sweating profusely, had hives and felt weak. The nurse did not understand Resident #53's medical condition and could not find Resident #53's medication used to treat the condition in the medication cart. Resident #53 requested to be transported the Emergency Department via 911. Upon return from the hospital, the facility failed to ensure medication to treat Resident #53's life threatening condition was available for administration. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 11/28/19 and diagnoses included quadriplegia C (cervical) 5 through C7 incomplete, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #53's physician orders dated, 12/23/21, revealed orders for Nifedipine capsule 10 milligram (mg), give one capsule by mouth every eight hours as needed for headache which occurred immediately after emptying bowel or bladder. Review of Resident #53's physician's orders revealed no order to discontinue this medication. Review of Resident #53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated , 01/06/23 revealed Resident #53 had intact cognition. Resident #53 required limited assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers, and total dependence from one staff person for toilet use. Review of Resident #53's care plan, dated 01/11/23 included Resident #53 had the potential for pain due to history of headaches and immobility. The goal developed was for Resident #53 to express pain level within satisfactory limits. Interventions included to administer pharmacological interventions as indicated per physician and monitor the effectiveness; assess for verbal and nonverbal signs and symptoms relating to pain such as grimacing, guarding, crying, moaning, increased anxiety. Resident #53 had quadriplegia related to history of motor vehicle accident (MVA) with spinal cord injury. The goal developed was for Resident #53 to maintain optimal status and quality of life within limitations imposed by quadriplegia. Interventions included to give medications as ordered and assess, document for side effects and effectiveness; pain management per orders, provide alternative comfort measures as needed, contact the physician if ineffective. Further review revealed Resident #53 did not have a care plan related to autonomic dysreflexia. Review of Resident #53's progress notes dated 02/18/23 at 1:00 A.M., written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #304 included Resident #53's needs could not be met at this time due to autonomic dysreflexia after facility attempted to meet Resident #53's needs. The services at the local hospital could meet Resident #53's needs at this time. Resident #53 and her responsible party were made aware of the transfer to the hospital. Review of Resident #53's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 02/18/23 at 1:17 A.M. included abnormal vital signs, other change in condition, and seems different than usual were marked on the form. Resident #53 had a severe headache, sweating, hives, and was weak which started on 02/18/23. Resident #53's vital signs taken on 02/18/23 at 1:00 A.M. were blood pressure was 103/59, pulse was 112, irregular, and new onset, respirations were 22 breaths per minute, temperature 96.6 Fahrenheit, oxygen saturation 98 percent on room air. Resident #53 had quadriplegia, C5 through C7, incomplete. Further review of the evaluation included Resident #53 had no changes in mental status, had general weakness, had general weakness without fever, change in level of consciousness, or other acute symptoms, had a severe headache, sweating, hives. Resident #53 had a severe headache at the front of her head and rated her pain a ten, on a scale of 0 to 10 (zero was no pain and 10 was excruciating pain). Review of Resident #53's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 02/18/23, revealed an order for Nifedipine capsule 10 mg, give one capsule by mouth every eight hours as needed for headache which occurred immediately after emptying bowel or bladder was not documented as given on this date. Review of Resident #53's Prehospital Care Report Summary dated, 02/18/23, included a call was received from the facility at 12:59 A.M. and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were on the scene at 1:04 A.M. Resident #53's vital signs at 1:17 A.M. were blood pressure of 133/76 (sitting), pulse 123 and regular, respirations 18, oxygen saturation was 95 percent and pain was rate a five, on a pain scale of zero through ten. Resident #53's vital signs at 1:26 A.M. were blood pressure 100/72 (sitting), pulse 95, respirations 18 breaths per minute, oxygen saturation 97 percent. The report further revealed Resident #53 had a spinal cord issue and was experiencing an episode with this issue. Resident #53 stated she had autonomic dysreflexia and was having a flare up with this condition. Resident #53 stated when this happened she experienced pain, high blood pressure, and a high heart rate. Resident #53 stated she would like to be seen at the hospital because of this flare up. Resident #53 stated the flare up started about five minutes prior to EMS arrival. Resident #53's status remained the same throughout transport. Review of Resident #53's medical record including progress notes, physician orders, and care plans dated 11/28/19 through 02/28/23, did not reveal documentation Resident #53 had autonomic dysreflexia (abnormal, overreaction of the involuntary (autonomic) nervous system to stimulation. This reaction may include change in heart rate, anxiety, dizziness, blurred vision, excessive sweating, high blood pressure, severe throbbing headache). The medical record did not include instructions on how to provide care and monitor Resident #53 for the condition. Review of Resident #53's After Visit Summary dated, 02/18/23, included Resident #53 had an acute non intractable tension-type headache, nausea and vomiting, history of quadriplegia, acute cystitis with hematuria and autonomic dysreflexia. Resident #53 was administered Ceftriaxone (antibiotic medication), Ketorolac (pain medication), and Scopolamine (transderm-scop patch to stop nausea and vomiting). Resident #53's discharge instructions included Scopolamine (transderm-scop) (antiemetic) one mg over three days, apply patch as directed every 72 hours; Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim (Bactrim DS antibiotic) 800-160 mg, take one tablet by mouth twice daily for seven days. Review of Resident #53's Order Audit Report dated, 02/18/23, revealed Nifedipine 10 mg capsule, give one capsule by mouth every eight hours as needed for headache which occurred immediately after emptying bowel or bladder was ordered from the pharmacy. Observation on 02/28/23 at 2:40 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 of Resident #53's medications located in the medication cart on the nursing unit Resident #53 resided on revealed Nifedipine 10 mg was not in the cart. LPN #300 stated Resident #53's Nifedipine which was ordered on 02/18/23 was on the way to the facility. LPN #300 stated she did not know why the Nifedipine was not delivered because it had been ten days since the order was placed. LPN #300 stated she called pharmacy, they could not tell her why the Nifedipine had not been delivered to the facility, but it would be delivered later today. LPN #300 indicated the pharmacy told her the prescription was current and there were no issues with it. Interview on 02/28/23 at 3:17 P.M. with LPN #300 revealed she was assigned to the nursing unit Resident #53 resided on most of the time when she worked. LPN #300 stated she did not know what autonomic dysreflexia was, but thought it had to do with the spine and affected the bowel and bladder. LPN #300 stated she did not know Resident #53 had autonomic dysreflexia. LPN #300 indicated about a year ago Resident #53 told her she had a spine injury and developed bad headaches, but did not specify what she did when she had the headaches and LPN #300 indicated she did not ask her. Interview on 02/28/23 at 3:52 P.M. with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #303 revealed she was aware Resident #53 had autonomic dysreflexia. NP #303 stated it was due to Resident #53's spinal cord injury. NP #303 stated autonomic dysreflexia could occur at the spur of the moment and was usually had an underlying cause such as a urinary tract infection. NP #303 indicated once the underlying problem was corrected the symptoms went away. NP #303 stated autonomic dysreflexia could be life threatening if it was not treated timely. NP #303 indicated medications which were classified as calcium channel blockers like Nifedipine were used to treat autonomic dysreflexia. NP #303 stated Resident #53 knew about autonomic dysreflexia and was aware of the symptoms and would let staff know if she had a problem. NP #303 stated she was aware Resident #53 was transported to the Emergency Department, Resident #53 had a severe onset of a headache and requested to go to the hospital. NP #303 stated if Resident #53's Nifedipine had been available it probably would have helped, and she was not aware the Nifedipine was not available on 02/18/23 when Resident #53 was taken to the hospital. NP #303 indicated she started working in the facility in May 2022 and as far as she knew Resident #53 had not taken the Nifedipine since that time. NP #303 stated it would be better if the trip to the Emergency Department was avoided, but the facility needed to abide by Resident #53's wishes. NP #303 stated Resident #53 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection at the Emergency Department and placed on Bactrim. Observation on 02/28/23 at 4:44 P.M. of Resident #53 revealed she was sitting in a padded wheelchair in her room and had just returned to the facility from an appointment. Interview on 02/28/23 at 4:44 P.M. with Resident #53 revealed when she first moved into the facility on [DATE] her autonomic dysreflexia was documented and she was able to have Nifedipine when she had a trigger. Resident #53 stated she had no idea where it was documented but the facility and nurses were aware of the condition and had been educated on it. Resident #53 stated the nursing staff was aware of her condition, would check her for triggers, and knew to administer Nifedipine when she had a trigger. Resident #53 stated the nurses who knew about her condition had all resigned and did now work for the facility now. Resident #53 stated when she first moved to the facility, she was having frequent urinary tract infections which would cause a flare up. Resident #53 indicated the triggers started to slow down and her last flare up was at least eight months ago. Resident #53 stated she had a spinal cord injury and autonomic dysreflexia would always be something she had to pay attention to. Resident #53 revealed on 02/18/23 she was in her padded wheelchair her room, had a pounding headache, was profusely sweating, and she wheeled into the common area where the nurses and aides were. Resident #53 stated she asked an unidentified aide to take her socks off because that would sometimes help with the symptoms. Resident #53 indicated after her socks were removed her head continued to pound, she knew her bladder was empty, she had a bowel movement, and knew she needed help. Resident #53 stated she told Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #304 she was having an autonomic dysreflexia flare up and was having symptoms of panting, profusely sweating, and headache. Resident #53 stated LPN #304 did not know what was going on and checked her blood pressure, but the wrist cuff did not work and her blood pressure was unable to be obtained. Resident #53 revealed LPN #304 stated what do you want me to do?, I don't know what to do, and Resident #53 was able with difficulty to say the word Nifedipine. LPN #304 looked in the computer, saw the order for Nifedipine, looked in the medication cart, was not able to find Nifedipine and told Resident #53 there was no Nifedipine in the cart. Resident #53 stated her head hurt so bad, she had difficulty speaking, but was able to tell LPN #304 to call 911. Resident #53 stated it was extremely scary for her to be in that situation because if she was not able to tell the nurses what she needed she could have had a seizure or stroke. Resident #53 stated if she was in the middle of a flare up and the nurses did not know how to treat her that was really scary. Resident #53 stated if she could have been administered the Nifedipine, it was a calcium channel blocker, and she would not have needed to be transported to the hospital. Resident #53 stated she did not know what medications she was administered while in the Emergency Department because she was so out of it. Resident #53 indicated the Emergency Department staff told her the autonomic dysreflexia could have been triggered from a urinary tract infection or her pressure ulcer. Resident #53 stated after she returned to the facility from the Emergency Department, she told Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO) #301 and Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) #305 about the issue with autonomic dysreflexia and RVPO #301 stated she would look into it. Interview on 02/28/23 at 4:17 P.M. with Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO) #301 and Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS) #302 revealed they did not know why Resident #53's Nifedipine was not in the medication cart. RVPO #301 and RDCS #302 stated pharmacy was called and they were waiting for a call back to explain why the Nifedipine was not available for Resident #53. RDCS #302 stated Resident #53 was receiving Bactrim DS to treat a urinary tract infection. Interview on 02/28/23 at 4:20 P.M. with Nurse Practitioner (NP) #303 revealed Resident #53 was administered Scopolamine for dizziness related to autonomic dysreflexia. NP #303 stated autonomic dysreflexia could happen when a spinal cord injury was sustained. NP #303 stated she would like to see education for the staff regarding autonomic dysreflexia and how to react to it when it occurred. Interview on 02/28/23 at 4:45 P.M. with RDCS #302 revealed Nifedipine was stocked in the automated medication dispensing system. RDCS #302 did not know why LPN #304 was not aware Nifedipine was stocked in the automated medication dispensing system. Review of the automated medication dispensing system inventory revealed Nifedipine 10 mg capsule was available in the system for the residents. Interview on 02/28/23 at 5:04 P.M. with RVPO #301 revealed Resident #53 talked to her about situation involving Resident #53's autonomic dysreflexia. RVPO #301 stated Resident #53 asked if she knew she went to hospital and there was a medication ordered when she was first admitted that wasn't available in the medication cart when she was having symptoms. RVPO #301 stated she told Resident #53 she would look into it and would check with the Director of Nursing. RVPO #301 stated she asked the DON about the situation. RVPO #301 stated Resident #53 had been a resident in the facility for a few years, physicians could discontinue medications if they were not used, and Nurse Practitioner #303 was coming to the facility the day Resident #53 talked to her or the next day and could see Resident #53 then. Review of Physiopedia article titled Autonomic Dysreflexia, undated, included Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) was a common life-threatening condition after a spinal cord injury (SCI), usually occurred if SCI was at or above the T6 level. AD was characterized by a sudden, exaggerated reflexive increase in blood pressure in response to a noxious stimulus, commonly bladder or bowel distension, arising below the neurological level of injury. Acute AD was characterized by severe paroxysmal hypertension associated with a throbbing headache, profuse sweating, flushing of the skin above the level of the lesion, bradycardia, cool, pale skin below the level of injury, and visual disturbances, dizziness, and anxiety, feeling of doom, which was sometimes accompanied by cognitive impairment. The most common initial complaint was a severe throbbing headache. Many patients with spinal cord injuries would have hypotension. Orthostatic hypotension was found in over 50 percent of patients with autonomic dysreflexia. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00140467.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's seizure medication was administered as ordered by the physician. This affected one reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's seizure medication was administered as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #15) out of three residents reviewed for medications administered as prescribed. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/22 and diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, seizures, and benign neoplasm of meninges. Review of Resident #15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated , 11/24/22, revealed Resident #15 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #15 required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers and toilet use. Review of Resident #15's physician orders dated 01/23/23, revealed orders for Dilantin (phenytoin) suspension 125 mg per five ml, give six ml by mouth three times a day for seizures, shake well before pouring. Review of Resident #15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 02/20/23 at 10:00 P.M. revealed Dilantin (phenytoin) Suspension 125 milligram (mg) per five milliliters (ml), give six ml by mouth for seizures was not administered. Further review on 02/21/23 at 6:00 A.M. revealed Dilantin (phenytoin) suspension 125 mg per five ml, give six ml by mouth for seizures was not administered. Review of Resident #15's progress notes dated 02/21/23 at 4:20 A.M. revealed pharmacy was called to re-order Dilantin (phenytoin) suspension 125 mg per five ml. Pharmacy stated they need a new script and the nurse contacted Resident #15's physician for a new prescription. Review of Resident #15's progress notes dated 02/21/23 at 5:03 A.M. revealed awaiting delivery of Dilantin suspension 125 mg per five ml. Review of Resident #15's Medication Error report dated, 02/21/23, at 5:44 P.M. documented by RN/UM #305 revealed the nurse did not administer Dilantin to Resident #15 due to unable to locate the medication in the medication cart. Pharmacy was called, and advised Resident #15 needed a new prescription for Dilantin and the physician was notified. Dilantin was available in the medication cart. The physician stated Resident #15 was not always compliant with medications and hold Dilantin until it was available. Per family request Dilantin level was done and within normal limits. No injuries were observed. Review of Resident #15's care plan dated, 02/25/23, included Resident #15 had an ADL (activity of daily living) self-care deficit related to brain tumor, seizures, epilepsy, altered mental status, arthritis. Interventions included Resident #15's needs would be met with staff assistance as needed, two person hands on care at all times. Interview on 02/27/23 at 5:09 P.M. with Family Member (FM) #306 revealed she was visiting Resident #15 and found out Resident #15 was not given a couple doses of her seizure medication but FM #306 was not sure what the name of the seizure medication was. FM #306 stated she made a complaint with Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) #305 about the missed seizure medication. FM #306 indicated RN/UM #305 told her an agency nurse was working when the doses were missed and the nurse did not recognize the name of the medication which was in the drawer and did not give it. FM #306 stated she thought the missed seizure medication was due in the afternoon and evening, around 1:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. FM #306 stated the family had a camera in Resident #15's room and had the recording on all the time. FM #306 stated RN/UM #305 knew which seizure medication was not given. FM #306 stated originally she was told her mother ran out of her medication, and she asked how that could happen if the facility was keeping track of it. FM #306 stated after Resident #15 missed two doses of the seizure medication she developed tremors. Interview on 02/27/23 at 5:18 P.M. with RN/UM #305 and Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO) #301 revealed RN/UM #305 stated she thought she called FM #306 about the missed doses seizure medication. RN/UM #305 stated the nurse assigned to administer Resident #15's medications could not find the seizure medication in the cart so the medication was not administered to Resident #15. RN/UM #305 stated the nurse was from an agency and she did not know her name. RN/UM #305 revealed the missed medication was Dilantin (phenytoin) liquid. RN/UM #305 stated the nurse called the pharmacy to reorder the medication and was told Resident #15 needed a new prescription. RN/UM #305 stated two doses of Dilantin were missed, the Dilantin liquid was in the medication cart the entire time and the nurse did not see it. RN/UM #305 stated Resident #15's physician was notified. RVPO #301 confirmed Resident #15 was not administered Dilantin liquid two times. Interview on 03/01/23 at 12:55 P.M. with RVPO #301 revealed Resident #15 was not administered Dilantin liquid one time on 02/20/23. RVPO #301 stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 gave the Dilantin on 02/21/23 at 6:00 A.M. but did not document on the Medication Administration Record it was given. RVPO #301 stated LPN #300 documented as a late entry she administered Resident #15's Dilantin liquid. Review of Resident #15's late entry progress note dated, 02/28/23 at 4:40 P.M., and written by LPN #300 revealed on 02/21/23 at 7:00 A.M. LPN #300 documented she administered Dilantin suspension 125 mg per five ml, give 6 ml by mouth three times a day for seizures to Resident #15, after locating the medication in the top drawer of the medication cart. Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration Times, revised 05/01/10, included the facility should ensure that authorized personnel, as determined by applicable law, administer medications according to times of administration as determined by facility's pharmacy committee and or physician prescriber. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00140628.
Jul 2019 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including macular degeneration, legal blindness, hearing loss and anxiety. On 07/24/19 at 9:15 A.M. Resident #64 was observed in her room laying in bed. The resident's call light was observed on the floor, out of reach of the resident. Registered Nurse (RN) #200 was interviewed on 07/24/19 at 9:30 A.M. and verified the call light was lying on the floor out of Resident #64's reach. On 07/25/19 at 1:00 P.M. during a follow up observation, Resident #64 was asked to activate her call light. The resident demonstrated the ability to activate the call light when it was within her reach. Review of the policy titled Resident Communication System and Call Light Policy, dated 06/30/17 revealed when answering call lights staff were expected to ensure the call light was within easy reach. This deficiency substantiates Complaint Number OH00105915 and Complaint Number OH00105619. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Resident #25, #46 and #64. This affected three residents (#25, #46 and #64) of 32 residents reviewed for call light placement. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, heart failure and pneumonia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of activities of daily living. Observation of Resident #25 on 07/25/19 at 9:17 A.M. revealed Resident #25 was laying in bed with his eyes open. The call light was noted to be clipped around the call cord approximately six inches from the call light shut off switch and out of reach of Resident #25. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #600 on 07/25/19 at 9:19 A.M. verified the call light was out of reach and that Resident #25 would be able to use the call light if it was within reach. 2. Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included seizures, dementia and hypertension. Review of the most recent MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Observation of Resident #46 on 07/25/19 at 9:25 A.M. revealed Resident #46 was up in her room sitting in a geri chair. Resident #46's call light was noted to be wrapped around her enteral feed pole (tube feed) and out of reach of Resident #46. Interview with LPN #601 on 07/25/19 at 9:27 A.M. verified Resident #46's call light was out of reach. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #602 on 07/25/19 at 9:33 A.M. revealed Resident #46 would be able to use the call light if it was within reach.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The medication error rate was calculate to be 9.37% and included th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The medication error rate was calculate to be 9.37% and included three medication errors of 32 medication administration opportunities. This affected one resident (#40) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's physician medication orders revealed the resident had the following ordered medications scheduled to be given daily at 9:00 A.M.: Lipitor 40 milligrams ordered on 05/25/19, Metoprolol 100 milligrams ordered on 06/12/19, and Dorzalamide-Timolol two drops in the left eye ordered on 07/10/19. On 07/23/19 from 8:28 A.M. to 8:42 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 was observed administering medications to Resident #40. At the time of the administration it was identified that the resident's Lipitor (an anti-cholesterol medication), Metoprolol (an antihypertensive), and Dorzalamide-Timolol (an anti-glaucoma eye drop medication) were due to be administered, however they were not available to be administered. These findings were confirmed with LPN #201, who said she would order them from the pharmacy. A follow-up interview with LPN #201 on 07/23/19 at 4:41 P.M. revealed the missing medications for Resident #40 had not yet been delivered to the facility or administered to the resident. The medications had been omitted at the time of administration as they were not available to administer. The medications should have been available. This deficiency substantiates Complaint Number OH00105915.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) medications were administered in a way that preserved proper infection control. This affected one resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) medications were administered in a way that preserved proper infection control. This affected one resident (#282) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Observation of an IV medication administration for Resident #282 by Registered Nurse (RN) #202 on 07/23/19 revealed after RN #202 primed the IV tubing, he hung it over the IV pump stand and let it dangle with the insertion point (which enters the resident's IV access to deliver the medication) exposed to air. RN #202 then proceeded to other tasks to prepare for the administration, leaving the insertion point unattended. While RN #202 was programming the pump, the rail shook and the tip of insertion point bounced twice against the metal IV stand. RN #202 then went to attach the IV to the resident's access, at which point the surveyor intervened and informed RN #202 of the above-noted breach in infection control. Following surveyor intervention, RN #202 stopped the administration process. Review of the facility IV infusion administration policy, dated 05/01/16 revealed the facility was to maintain asepsis between priming the IV administration set and attaching it to the [resident's] needleless IV connector.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $28,276 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 20 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $28,276 in fines. Higher than 94% of Ohio facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (18/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 18/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center Staffed?

CMS rates HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 69%, which is 23 percentage points above the Ohio average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center?

State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 18 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center?

HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 96 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HIGHLAND HEIGHTS, Ohio.

How Does Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (69%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER is high. At 69%, the facility is 23 percentage points above the Ohio average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center Ever Fined?

HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER has been fined $28,276 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Ohio average of $33,362. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Highland Pointe Health & Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?

HIGHLAND POINTE HEALTH & REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.