KNOLLS OF OXFORD

6727 CONTRERAS ROAD, OXFORD, OH 45056 (513) 524-7980
For profit - Corporation 57 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#96 of 913 in OH
Last Inspection: May 2023

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Knolls of Oxford has received an impressive Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility that ranks among the best. It is positioned at #96 out of 913 nursing homes in Ohio, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and ranks #5 out of 24 in Butler County, meaning only four local options are better. The trend is improving, with issues decreasing from three in 2018 to just one in 2023, highlighting the facility's commitment to better care. Staffing is a relative strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars, with a low turnover rate of 20%, significantly below the state average of 49%, ensuring continuity of care. However, there were some concerns noted, such as a failure to post a no-smoking sign for a resident on oxygen, delayed interventions for a resident experiencing significant weight loss, and improper cleaning of a glucometer that could potentially affect multiple residents. Overall, while there are some areas needing attention, Knolls of Oxford demonstrates strong qualities alongside manageable weaknesses.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Ohio
#96/913
Top 10%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
20% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 28 points below Ohio's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Ohio. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2018: 3 issues
2023: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (20%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (20%)

    28 points below Ohio average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Ohio's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Dec 2023 1 deficiency
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information as required. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Facility censu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information as required. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 49. Findings include: Observation on 11/30/23 at 11:30 A.M. of the Health Care Pavilion Staffing Guide posted at the nurse station, revealed the posting was dated 05/18/23. Interview on 11/30/23 at 1:31 A.M. the Director of Nursing, (DON) verified the posted Health Care Pavilion Staffing Guide was the facility's daily posting of staffing information for residents and visitors. The DON verified the posting was to completed daily and the last daily staffing information, dated 05/18/23, was posted by the Scheduler #70. The DON had no knowledge of why the daily staffing information had not been posted since May 2023. Interview on 12/04/23 at 10:42 A.M., Scheduler #70 verified the daily staffing information had not been posted since May 2023 and records had not been maintained over the past six months. Scheduler #70 stated she had stopped posting the daily staffing information because it was difficult to adjust the daily staffing numbers when staff did not come to work. This deficiency is based on incidental findings discovered during the course of this complaint investigation.
Sept 2018 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a no smoking/oxyg...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a no smoking/oxygen in use sign was posted for a resident receiving oxygen therapy. This affected one (#46) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 14 residents receiving oxygen therapy. The resident census was 55. Findings include: Medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anemia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed she had a cognition impairment and required the assistance of staff with her activities of daily living. Review of physician orders dated 09/02/19 revealed oxygen was to be titrated to keep her oxygen saturations above 90% PRN (as needed). Observation on 09/10/18 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Resident #46 was receiving two liters per minute of oxygen therapy via nasal cannula. There was no smoking/oxygen in use sign was not on the door. On 09/11/18 at 3:10 P.M. the resident was sitting in her room chair with the oxygen concentrator beside her. The resident said she last used oxygen at lunch time today and she usually used oxygen at night. On 09/11/18 at 3:30 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #325 said the resident used oxygen PRN (as needed). The nurse checked the residents' oxygen saturation levels PRN. LPN #325 verified the resident did not have a smoking/oxygen in use sign on her door. LPN #325 said the physician had recently ordered the oxygen therapy. On 09/11/18 at 3:42 P.M. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #330 stated the resident used the oxygen at night and sometimes during the day. A review of the Oxygen Administration policy (undated) was conducted. This policy instructed No Smoking/Oxygen in Use signs were to be used.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement timely interventions for a resident with a signific...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement timely interventions for a resident with a significant weight loss. This affected one (#17) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/05/16 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, Parkinson's disease. Resident #17's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident has severe cognitive impairment and requires extensive assist with all activities of daily living including dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and eating. Review of the resident's weight log revealed the resident's weight on 08/06/18 was 167.4 pounds and on 09/03/18 the residents weight was 157.6 pounds indicating a weight loss of 5.85% in twenty-eight days. Further review of Resident #17's medical record revealed no documentation related to the significant weight loss, from 09/03/18 to 09/12/18. On 09/12/18 at 9:04 A.M., during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 revealed the Licensed Dietician Registered Dietician (LDRD) #200 was in the facility on 9/11/18 and requested the resident be re-weighed, no new orders for dietary interventions were given for Resident #17 at that time. LPN #301 stated the resident was re-weighed on 09/12/18 and weighed 157.8 pounds, LDRD #200 was notified and new orders were given for two nutritional supplements for Resident #17: Ensure Plus 120 milliliters (mls) twice daily, and Magic Cup with lunch and dinner. Review of the Clinical Notes dated 09/12/18 at 10:18 A.M., LDRD #200 documented Resident reviewed, resident re-weight obtained today at 157.8 pounds which verifies weight of 157.6 pounds obtained on 09/03/18 and indicates a significant weight loss of 5.7% in one month. Current body Mass Index (BMI) of 30.9 indicating obesity. On 09/13/18 at 10:54 A.M. during an interview LDRD #200 confirmed nutritional interventions for Resident #17 were not implemented on 09/03/18 when the significant weight loss was discovered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one residents's (#...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one residents's (#34) glucometer was cleansed and disinfected appropriately. This occurred when the glucometer was cleansed with an alcohol pad after use. This affected one resident (#34) of one sampled residents for glucometer cleansing. This had the potential to affect three (#34, #3 and #45) residents who had glucometer monitoring on the Memory Support Unit and shared the device. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, unspecified osteoarthritis, history of falling, muscle weakness and Vitamin D deficiency, unspecified. On 09/12/18 at 4:20 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 removed a bag from the medication cart that contained alcohol pads and the residents' glucometer. The nurse said she cleansed the glucometer after use with an alcohol pad. LPN #301 conducted a fingerstick blood glucose sample from Resident #34 finger. At 4:33 P.M. when she went to clean the glucometer prior to putting it back into the medication cart, the nurse wiped it down with an alcohol pad. On 09/12/18 at 4:35 P.M. an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the glucometer should have been cleaned after use with the disposable germicidal cleansing wipes. He affirmed the facility policy for Glucometer Cleaning attested to this instruction. The facility confirmed this had the potential to affect the three (#34, #3 and #45) residents who share the glucometer. A review of the Glucometer Cleaning Policy dated 10/15/17 was conducted. The policy instructed the glucometers used for testing (active) residents' blood sugars will be cleansed after each use with the disposable germicidal cleansing wipes. The procedure instructed to wipe the exposed surfaces of the glucometer using the disposable germicidal surface wipes for four minutes. Allow the meter to dry on a clean surface.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Ohio.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Ohio facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Knolls Of Oxford's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns KNOLLS OF OXFORD an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Knolls Of Oxford Staffed?

CMS rates KNOLLS OF OXFORD's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 20%, compared to the Ohio average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Knolls Of Oxford?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at KNOLLS OF OXFORD during 2018 to 2023. These included: 3 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Knolls Of Oxford?

KNOLLS OF OXFORD is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 57 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in OXFORD, Ohio.

How Does Knolls Of Oxford Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, KNOLLS OF OXFORD's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (20%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Knolls Of Oxford?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Knolls Of Oxford Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, KNOLLS OF OXFORD has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Knolls Of Oxford Stick Around?

Staff at KNOLLS OF OXFORD tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 20%, the facility is 26 percentage points below the Ohio average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 11%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Knolls Of Oxford Ever Fined?

KNOLLS OF OXFORD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Knolls Of Oxford on Any Federal Watch List?

KNOLLS OF OXFORD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.