ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good, solid choice for care. It ranks #101 out of 282 facilities in Oklahoma, placing it in the top half of nursing homes in the state, but it is last in its county at #3 of 3, suggesting there are limited local options. The facility is newly inspected, so there is no trend data available yet. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5 stars rating and a turnover rate of 40%, which is lower than the state average. There have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign. However, there have been some concerning issues identified during inspections. For example, the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse signed off on important resident assessments, which is a regulatory requirement. Additionally, there were instances where residents did not receive necessary Medicare notifications properly, and comprehensive care plans were not developed for residents on critical medications. Overall, while the facility has some strengths, these compliance issues highlight areas that need attention.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Oklahoma
- #101/282
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Too New
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Oklahoma's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oklahoma facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Oklahoma average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Oklahoma average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Oklahoma avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Mar 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the faciity failed to complete a significant change assessment for one (#57) of two sampled residents reviewed for a significant change.
Findings:
Resident #57 h...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident assessments was transmitted within seven days of com...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were accurately completed for one (#22) of two sampled residents reviewed for neurological checks.
The Administ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff secured medication carts when unattended.
The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
On 03/1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide timely and complete beneficiary notices to three (#51, #16, #109) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices.
The ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to hospice, antipsychotic, anticoagulant, and opioid medications for two residents (#14 and #46) of 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised after each assessment for two (#31 and #36) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed.
Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained infection control measures when passing medications.
The Administrator identifed 51 residents reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0642
(Tag F0642)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse coordinated and signed resident assessments prior to submission to CMS.
The DON reported 51 residents resided in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oklahoma facilities.
- • 40% turnover. Below Oklahoma's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Elk City's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Elk City Staffed?
CMS rates ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Oklahoma average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Elk City?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2024. These included: 9 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Elk City?
ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 118 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 39% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ELK CITY, Oklahoma.
How Does Elk City Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Elk City?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Elk City Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Elk City Stick Around?
ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Oklahoma nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Elk City Ever Fined?
ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Elk City on Any Federal Watch List?
ELK CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.