ENID SENIOR CARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Enid Senior Care has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its operations and care quality. It ranks #219 out of 282 facilities in Oklahoma, placing it in the bottom half, and #6 out of 6 in Garfield County, meaning there are no better local options. Although the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, it still has a troubling history, including critical incidents where residents were not provided appropriate care and safety measures. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 34%, which is better than the state average, though the facility has less RN coverage than 77% of Oklahoma facilities, potentially impacting the quality of care. The fines of $52,775 are concerning, indicating compliance problems, and specific incidents such as a fire caused by a resident smoking with oxygen on and another resident being fed incorrectly highlight serious safety and health risks that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oklahoma
- #219/282
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 34% turnover. Near Oklahoma's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $52,775 in fines. Lower than most Oklahoma facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (34%)
14 points below Oklahoma average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Oklahoma average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
12pts below Oklahoma avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 02/21/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure the safety of Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update/revise a care plan for a resident who smoked for 1 (#1) of 6...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change MDS assessment was completed for one (#12) of one sampled resident started on hemodialysis.
The DON identified ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for one (#117) of sixteen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for one (#12) of one sampled resident receiving hemodialysis.
The DON identified one reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual competency reviews were completed for one (CNA#1) of two sampled CNAs who were reviewed for annual competency review.
The HR...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to EBP while providing care for one (#33) of one sampled resident reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions.
The admi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised and/or updated for three (#5, #11 and #63) of sixteen sampled residents reviewed for care plans.
The adminis...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
8 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
On 06/29/22 at 12:18 p.m., the OSDH confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy related to the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a physician ordered puree diet with restriction fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a procedure in place to obtain a consent /declination of the C...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to follow a physician order (physical therapy evaluation for a headrest) for one (#42) of one sampled residents reviewed for physi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor for antipsychotic medication side effects for one ( #43) of six sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
The Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to
1. date/label unused foods;
2. discard unused foods within 5 days; and
3. maintain a clean/sanitary kitchen.
The Resident Census and Conditio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff wore the proper PPE during a COVID positive outbreak within the facility. This had the potential to affect al...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0886
(Tag F0886)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to routinely test staff, who were not up to date on COVID-19 vaccinatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
6. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, heart failure and Alzheimer's disease.
Resident #3's care plan, dated 04/08/22, read in part, .assist resident with turning and r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 34% turnover. Below Oklahoma's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $52,775 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $52,775 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Oklahoma. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (11/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Enid Senior Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ENID SENIOR CARE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Enid Senior Care Staffed?
CMS rates ENID SENIOR CARE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Oklahoma average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Enid Senior Care?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at ENID SENIOR CARE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Enid Senior Care?
ENID SENIOR CARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MARSH POINTE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 102 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 57% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ENID, Oklahoma.
How Does Enid Senior Care Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, ENID SENIOR CARE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Enid Senior Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Enid Senior Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ENID SENIOR CARE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Enid Senior Care Stick Around?
ENID SENIOR CARE has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Oklahoma nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Enid Senior Care Ever Fined?
ENID SENIOR CARE has been fined $52,775 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Oklahoma average of $33,607. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Enid Senior Care on Any Federal Watch List?
ENID SENIOR CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.