HILL NURSING HOME, INC.
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Hill Nursing Home, Inc. has a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns about resident care. It ranks #231 out of 282 facilities in Oklahoma, placing it in the bottom half, and #2 out of 3 in McCurtain County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's situation is worsening, with issues increasing from 7 in 2023 to 9 in 2024. Although staffing turnover is impressively low at 0%, the overall staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars, suggesting that there may not be enough staff to provide adequate care. Concerningly, the facility has incurred $116,810 in fines, which is higher than 97% of Oklahoma facilities, indicating ongoing compliance issues. In terms of RN coverage, it is average, which means that while there are some registered nurses available, they may not be as abundant as in better-performing facilities. Specific incidents include a critical failure to ensure background checks for 45 employees, raising serious safety concerns, and another critical issue where residents were served hot liquids at unsafe temperatures, posing a risk of burns. Additionally, the facility was found to have allowed one resident to suffer skin tears due to abuse, with five allegations of abuse reported in the last six months. Overall, while there are some strengths in staffing stability, the serious deficiencies highlight significant risks that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oklahoma
- #231/282
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $116,810 in fines. Lower than most Oklahoma facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Oklahoma average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice resulted in skin t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their written abuse policies and procedures for one (#1) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
The administrator identifi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the two hour required timeframe to the Oklahoma State Department of Health for one (#1) of three sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper pain management for one (#31) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for an injury of unknown origin.
T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one (#31) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for an injury of unknown origin.
The administ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to impliment their policy regarding monitoring and measures to prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria for the facility.
The administrator id...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facilty failed to provide documentation regarding offering or given the pneumococcal v...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner for the residents.
The administrator identified 38 residents who a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were:
a. prepared in advance,
b. followed, and
c. reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other qualified nutrit...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
7 deficiencies
2 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
On 05/10/23 at 11:45 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to be in existence related to the facility failing to ensure residents were served hot liquids at a safe temperature to preven...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(L)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
On 05/12/23 at 3:30 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to be in existence related to the facility failing to ensure background screenings were completed for 45 of 66 employees.
On 0...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with burns from drinking hot liquid for one (#22) of two sampled residents who had burns from hot liquid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan with interventions to prevent falls for one (#11) of one sampled resident reviewed for falls.
The DON identified 25 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of out of parameter blood sugars and failed to obtain a physician's order to hold insulin for one (#1) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for oxygen therapy and oxygen tubing was changed and labeled for one (#6) of one samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure puree diets were prepared in a sanitary manner.
The Dietary Manager (DM) identified two of two sampled residents who received a pureed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pasteurized eggs served to residents were fully cooked for one (#7) of one sampled resident served over easy eggs.
The administrator ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure policies were in place to track vaccination status for six (CNA #11, medical director, nurse practitioner, pharmacist, dietician, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:
A. documentation of staff vaccination status for one, (CNA #11), of 62 facility employees reviewed and five (medical director, nur...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $116,810 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $116,810 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Oklahoma. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Hill, Inc.'s CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HILL NURSING HOME, INC. an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Hill, Inc. Staffed?
CMS rates HILL NURSING HOME, INC.'s staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Hill, Inc.?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at HILL NURSING HOME, INC. during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Hill, Inc.?
HILL NURSING HOME, INC. is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 51 certified beds and approximately 39 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in IDABEL, Oklahoma.
How Does Hill, Inc. Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, HILL NURSING HOME, INC.'s overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hill, Inc.?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Hill, Inc. Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HILL NURSING HOME, INC. has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Hill, Inc. Stick Around?
HILL NURSING HOME, INC. has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Hill, Inc. Ever Fined?
HILL NURSING HOME, INC. has been fined $116,810 across 2 penalty actions. This is 3.4x the Oklahoma average of $34,247. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Hill, Inc. on Any Federal Watch List?
HILL NURSING HOME, INC. is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.