SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY

11 PALM STREET, YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 354-1901
For profit - Individual 47 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#28 of 282 in OK
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Spanish Cove Housing Authority in Yukon, Oklahoma has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #28 out of 282 nursing homes in Oklahoma, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #2 out of 5 in Canadian County, meaning there are only a couple of better local choices. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 2 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, rated 5 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 38%, which is significantly lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with residents. While the facility has some excellent ratings, it has faced challenges, including a serious incident where a resident did not receive the necessary assistance during a transfer, leading to potential fall risks. Additionally, there were concerns about medication administration, with one resident's prescribed medication not being given as ordered on multiple occasions, which raises potential health risks. On a positive note, the overall care quality is good, with high ratings in health inspections and staffing, but families should be aware of these specific incidents when making their decision.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Oklahoma
#28/282
Top 9%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Oklahoma's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$8,018 in fines. Higher than 91% of Oklahoma facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Oklahoma. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Oklahoma average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Oklahoma avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $8,018

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a MDS assessment for one (#37) of five residents sampled for accuracy for MDS assessments. The Administrator identified 44 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a MDS assessment for one (#37) of five residents sampled for accuracy for MDS assessments. The Administrator identified 44 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A MDS Assessment Coordinator policy, revised November 2019, read in part each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment Resident #37 was admitted on this date 09/21/24 with diagnosis that included fracture of right femur and depression. A Medication List from admission orders, dated 09/21/24, documented Quetiapine (Seroquel) 25mg one tablet given daily for 5 days. The facility's Comprehensive Assessment, dated 09/28/24, documented in section N that Resident #37 received a Antipsychotic medication upon admission. Section N0450 on assessment was coded a zero for Resident #37 not receiving a Antipsychotic since admission. The facility's Medication Administration Record, dated September 2024, documented Resident #37 received Seroquel 25mg on September 21 through 25th. On 10/22/24 at 10:16 a.m., MDS Coordinator #1 was asked the facility policy for accurately coding MDS. They stated for section N of a MDS the information comes from the MAR(medication administration record). They were then asked to review admission MDS for Resident #37 dated 09/28/24, section N, then asked is the section for Antipsychotic medication was coded correctly. They stated section N0450 is not coded correctly, Resident #37 received Antipsychotic medication since admission.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance with transfers for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The ADON identifie...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance with transfers for one (#3) of five sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The ADON identified 42 residents resided in the facility and 31 residents required assistance with transfers. Findings: The facility's Gait Belt policy, dated 2023, read in part, .Gait Belts promote the safe handling and mobility of residents .Spanish Cove requires a gait belt when assisting all residents with ambulation or transfer .Nursing assistants must wear gait belts at all times . The facility's Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, .Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belts, lateral boards) and mechanical lifting devices .Only staff with documented training on the safe use and care of the machines and equipment used in this facility will be allowed to lift or move residents . An undated facility Policy Statement for Agency Staff policy, read in part, .Gait Belt Policy: Gait belt must be used for all transfers unless otherwise contraindicated and in care plan. Gait belt must be used when assisting a resident with ambulation. You are required to arrive at the facility with your gait belt on your person. Your gait belt should always be on your person . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included orthostatic hypotension, difficulty walking, and unsteady on feet. An admission assessment, dated, 09/02/24, documented the resident was dependent on staff for transfers. Emergency room/hospital notes, dated 09/12/24 through 09/18/24, documented Resident #3 presented to the emergency department with complaint of syncope which resulted in blunt head trauma, and the development of nausea, vomiting, headache, and lightheadedness. It was documented the resident was found to have had a large right subdural hematoma. It was documented the resident progressively became more somnolent in the ER. It was documented the resident had demonstrable neurologic compression and structural issues which caused significant functional impairment in most activities of daily living for which surgery was appropriate. It was documented the resident underwent subdural hematoma evacuation on 09/18/24. A care plan, updated 09/17/24, documented to encourage use of an assistive device. Staff to use walker and gait belt to/from bathroom/dining room. Second staff member was to follow with a chair. On 09/19/24 at 5:15 p.m., OSDH received a Combined Initial and Final state incident report. It was documented CNA #2 was toileting Resident #3 and they wanted to stand to urinate. It was documented CNA #2 did not put a gait belt on resident. It was documented CNA #2 turned away from the resident and the resident fell backwards into the shower and hit their head. It was documented the resident started having nausea and vomiting shortly after fall and was on plavix. It was documented the resident was sent to the ER and diagnosed with a severe brain bleed. It was documented the resident had emergency surgery on 09/18/24. On 09/25/25 at 2:23 p.m., the ADON stated the policy for transfers was to follow the care plan and to use a gait belt for all transfers except for mechanical lift transfers. On 09/25/24 at 2:26 p.m., the ADON stated their expectation for supervision for all ADLs was to always use a gait belt and ensure they held the gait belt the entire time a resident was standing. On 09/26/24 at 10:18 a.m., the ADON stated agency staff were e-mailed the transfer/gait belt policy. They stated the agency staff were to sign the document before they were allowed to work. On 09/26/24 at 11:24 a.m., the ADON stated they did not have a signed policy statement for CNA#2. On 09/26/24 at 3:23 p.m., the home care director of operations stated they did not have a signed policy document from CNA #2. They stated they received the form a few days prior. On 09/27/24 at 9:27 a.m., CNA #2 stated they had never used a gait belt when assisting Resident #3 with their ADLs.
May 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for one (#1) of three sampled residents whose medication profiles were...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for one (#1) of three sampled residents whose medication profiles were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/09/23, documented 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019, read in part, .Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders . Res #1 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease and chronic pain. A Physician's Order for Res #1, dated 05/04/23, documented, Lactulose 30mls po once daily. Res #1's MAR, dated May 2023, had no initials for Lactulose on 05/04/23, 05/06/23, 05/08/23, nor 05/09/23. On 05/10/23 at 12:10 p.m., Res #1 stated they had been experiencing constipation and had received an order for a laxative, but had to request it. On 05/10/23 at 3:36 p.m., the DON was asked to review the Lactulose order for Res #1 and the medication administration data on the May 2023 MAR. The DON was asked if the medication had been administered according to the prescriber's order. She stated, No, it doesn't look like it.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Oklahoma.
  • • 38% turnover. Below Oklahoma's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 3 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Spanish Cove Housing Authority's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Spanish Cove Housing Authority Staffed?

CMS rates SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Oklahoma average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Spanish Cove Housing Authority?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 2 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Spanish Cove Housing Authority?

SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 47 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 104% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in YUKON, Oklahoma.

How Does Spanish Cove Housing Authority Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Spanish Cove Housing Authority?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Spanish Cove Housing Authority Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Spanish Cove Housing Authority Stick Around?

SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Oklahoma nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Spanish Cove Housing Authority Ever Fined?

SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY has been fined $8,018 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Oklahoma average of $33,159. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Spanish Cove Housing Authority on Any Federal Watch List?

SPANISH COVE HOUSING AUTHORITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.