GRACELEN CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Gracelen Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at this facility. It ranks #115 out of 127 nursing homes in Oregon, placing it in the bottom half, and #32 out of 33 in Multnomah County, suggesting that there are very few options for better care nearby. The facility is showing an improving trend, with issues decreasing from 18 in 2024 to 9 in 2025, although it still has a high number of total deficiencies at 54. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 0%, which is much better than the state average, and there are no fines on record, which is a positive sign. However, serious incidents have occurred, including a resident experiencing a hip fracture due to an avoidable fall and staff failing to perform proper hand hygiene, which poses risks for infection spread. Overall, while there are some positive aspects like low turnover and no fines, the facility's low trust grade and numerous issues raise significant concerns for families considering this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oregon
- #115/127
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oregon facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oregon. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 54 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Oregon average (3.0)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
The Ugly 54 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure equipment was properly secure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2025
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of potential abuse to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This plac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement the care plan for 2 of 5 sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care planned interventions to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. There were three errors in 25 opportunities re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication storage was free fr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform hand hygiene for 1 of 1 sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours 7 days per week for 8 of 62 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse by staff for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Requirements
(Tag F0622)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to document the basis for transfer and failed to include code and health status to the receiving provider for 1 of 3 sampled ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
16 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity related to dining needs for 1 of 2 sampled dining rooms reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including anxiety disorders and depression.
a. Resident 12's 3/19/24 Physician Order indicated the resident was prescribed clonazepa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for wheelchair accommodations. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#5) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent, assess, monitor and reevaluate for use of a restraint for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of suspected abuse in a timely manner for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3 and 18) reviewed for abuse. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#53) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition), bipolar disorder (a mental health condition) and stroke.
A 1/18/24...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were not prescribed unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#29) reviewed for medications. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff competencies for 5 of 5 sampled staff (#s 14, 22, 23, 24 and 25) reviewed for competencies. This plac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 4 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 8, 17, 18 and 19) reviewed for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 4/2/24 between the hours of 11:55 AM and 12:30 PM, during the lunch meal in the East dining room, the following observations were made:
-12:02 PM an unidentified CNA put on clean gloves and the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 4 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 16, 17, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined the Dietary Manager failed to obtain the required certification to provide dietary management services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified d...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
7 deficiencies
4 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of a significant change in condition and head injury for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 a...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record reviewed it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for use of physical restr...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly transfer a resident to the hospital related to a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters for nutrition for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for wei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for skin impairment. This placed residents at risk for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility to ensure safe transfers were performed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for transfer safety. This placed residents at ris...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0777
(Tag F0777)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely lab services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for change in condition. This placed residents at r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
20 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
b. A review of the facility's 2020 COVID-19 Infection Control Prevention policy revealed:
Staff will encourage and assist residents with hand hygiene prior to and after each meal .
Resident 55 was adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess/measure resident wounds, monitor wounds for signs/symptoms of infection and documen...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and a saf...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received timely spec...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility's quality assessment and assurance committee (QAA) failed to systematically identify and correct deficiencies in the areas of dignit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative in a timely manner regarding a resident-to-resident incident for 1 of 3 sampled residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a personalized, homelike environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#41) reviewed for personal property. This placed resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
3. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 6/2018 with diagnoses including frontotemporal dementia (a type of dementia characterized by changes in emotions, behavior, personality and language).
O...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#59) reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 6/2018 with diagnoses including frontotemporal dementia (a type of dementia characterized by changes in emotions, behavior, personality and language).
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary care and services related to bathing/showering and nail care for 1 of 6 sampled residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in 5/2017 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services related to the use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 1 sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.
Resident 12's 10/26/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 12 ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of less than 5%. There were six errors in 33 opportunities resulting in a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure provision of education related to risks and benefits, informed consent and the opportunity to receive administratio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 9 out of 100 days reviewed for staffing. This p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined the Dietary Manager (DM) did not obtain the required certification to provide dietary management services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualifie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified and trained Infection Preventionist for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and contro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oregon facilities.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), 9 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 54 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Gracelen's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GRACELEN CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Oregon, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Gracelen Staffed?
CMS rates GRACELEN CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Gracelen?
State health inspectors documented 54 deficiencies at GRACELEN CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 9 that caused actual resident harm, and 44 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Gracelen?
GRACELEN CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 80 certified beds and approximately 66 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PORTLAND, Oregon.
How Does Gracelen Compare to Other Oregon Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oregon, GRACELEN CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gracelen?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Gracelen Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GRACELEN CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Oregon. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Gracelen Stick Around?
GRACELEN CARE CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Gracelen Ever Fined?
GRACELEN CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Gracelen on Any Federal Watch List?
GRACELEN CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.