MARQUIS MILL PARK
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Marquis Mill Park has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and sits in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #60 out of 127 facilities in Oregon, indicating it is in the top half, and #16 out of 33 in Multnomah County, suggesting there are only a few better local options. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, earning a 5/5 star rating with a turnover rate of 53%, which is average but still allows for some staff familiarity with residents. On the downside, the facility has faced $17,345 in fines, which is concerning and suggests there may be compliance issues. Notably, there were serious incidents, including a failure to follow infection control practices during a COVID-19 outbreak, putting residents at risk. Additionally, there were instances of inadequate hand hygiene during medication administration, raising concerns about infection spread. Overall, while staffing is strong, families should be aware of these significant weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Oregon
- #60/127
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $17,345 in fines. Higher than 57% of Oregon facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 73 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Oregon nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Oregon average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Oregon avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
7 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including UTI.
Resident 65's 12/20/24 Discharge Return No...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan related to the use of hearing aids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#269) revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0742
(Tag F0742)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment and services to correct ongoing signs of depressive behavior for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. There were two errors in 29 opportunities resu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during medication administration for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 33, 41 and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 4/2022 with diagnoses including pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas).
On 6/28/22 at 2:00 PM, 6/29/22 at 3:05 PM and 6/30/22 at 9:54 AM, Mylanta (u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure surgical wound care ordered were clarified and sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for supplemental oxygen use and failed to provide respiratory care and services in ac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a written agreement with the hospice service was formulated and signed by an authorized representative before hospi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow COVID-19 screening procedures for 1 of 2 screening areas reviewed for COVID-19 symptom screening. This placed residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $17,345 in fines. Above average for Oregon. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (51/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Marquis Mill Park's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MARQUIS MILL PARK an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Oregon, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Marquis Mill Park Staffed?
CMS rates MARQUIS MILL PARK's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the Oregon average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Marquis Mill Park?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at MARQUIS MILL PARK during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 13 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Marquis Mill Park?
MARQUIS MILL PARK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MARQUIS COMPANIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 77 certified beds and approximately 66 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PORTLAND, Oregon.
How Does Marquis Mill Park Compare to Other Oregon Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oregon, MARQUIS MILL PARK's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Marquis Mill Park?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Marquis Mill Park Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MARQUIS MILL PARK has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oregon. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Marquis Mill Park Stick Around?
MARQUIS MILL PARK has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the Oregon average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Marquis Mill Park Ever Fined?
MARQUIS MILL PARK has been fined $17,345 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Oregon average of $33,252. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Marquis Mill Park on Any Federal Watch List?
MARQUIS MILL PARK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.