AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Avalon Care Center in Scappoose, Oregon, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #2 out of 127 facilities in the state, placing it in the top tier of nursing homes in Oregon, and is the best option out of the two available in Columbia County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to one in 2025, and it has a low staff turnover rate of 0%, which is well below the state average. However, families should be aware of some concerns; for instance, there were reports of a resident suffering from a fracture that required emergency care, and there have been multiple complaints about food being served cold, which could affect nutrition. Overall, while the staffing and overall quality are strong points, attention to food quality and safety practices needs improvement.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Oregon
- #2/127
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oregon facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 35 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Oregon. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor a grievance resolution for 1 of 3 residents (#401) reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk of not hav...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care in accordance with care planned interventions while pushing a resident in a wheelchair for 1 of 1 sampled res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#24) reviewed for communicat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper food temperatures were maintained for meals served to residents on 3 of 3 halls reviewed for d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor temperatures and cleanliness of 1 of 1 unit refrigerator. This placed the residents at risk for food...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#72) reviewed for dignity....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for resident to resident inciden...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 9/2015 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, depression and anxiety.
On 8/1/19 a Facility Reported Incident was received by the State Agency which indi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2018
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure maintenance services provided...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have an appropriate indication for the continued use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to administer insulin medication as ordered which re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
4. Resident 228 was admitted to the facility in 3/2018 for diagnoses including osteoarthritis and generalized muscle weakness.
The 3/22/18 admission MDS under section G: Functional Status indicated R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Oregon.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oregon facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Avalon - Scappoose's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Oregon, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Avalon - Scappoose Staffed?
CMS rates AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Avalon - Scappoose?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE during 2018 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Avalon - Scappoose?
AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AVALON HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 40 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SCAPPOOSE, Oregon.
How Does Avalon - Scappoose Compare to Other Oregon Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oregon, AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avalon - Scappoose?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Avalon - Scappoose Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oregon. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Avalon - Scappoose Stick Around?
AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Avalon - Scappoose Ever Fined?
AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Avalon - Scappoose on Any Federal Watch List?
AVALON CARE CENTER - SCAPPOOSE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.