PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER

777 FERRY ROAD, DOYLESTOWN, PA 18901 (215) 340-5200
Non profit - Corporation 90 Beds PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#99 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: March 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Pine Run Health Center in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is considered excellent and highly recommended for care. Ranked #99 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, it is in the top half of all state nursing homes, and #10 out of 29 in Bucks County, meaning there are only nine better local options. The facility is new, with its first inspection showing a stable trend, and no fines have been recorded, which is a positive sign. Staffing is strong, earning a 5/5 star rating with a 40% turnover rate, which is below the state average, and they have good RN coverage. However, there were some concerns: food was not stored under sanitary conditions in the kitchen, dignity was not maintained for some residents, and there were failures to implement physician orders for monitoring resident weights, which could lead to health risks. While Pine Run has notable strengths, these weaknesses should be carefully considered by families researching their options.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Pennsylvania
#99/653
Top 15%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Mar 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dignity was maintained for two of 18 sampled residents. (Residents 45, 222) Findings include:...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dignity was maintained for two of 18 sampled residents. (Residents 45, 222) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 45 had diagnoses that included stroke, hemiplegia to the left side, depression, and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident preferred activities that identified with his prior lifestyle and staff were to include the resident's preferences in rendering care and services. On March 19, 2024, at 1:33 p.m., Resident 45 was observed in bed. The white board on the wall in his room displayed March 11, 2024, and identified an assigned nurse and nurse aide for that date. During the observation, the resident stated that he preferred the white board to be updated daily with accurate and current information and he does not recall the last time staff updated the board. Observations on March 20, 2024, at 11:52 a.m., and March 21, 2024, at 11:20 a.m., revealed that the resident's white board still displayed March 11, 2024, with the same staff names. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 222 had diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow) and neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). Resident 222 was ordered by the physician to utilize a foley catheter for urination. Observations on March 19, 2024, from 11:04 a.m. through 1:00 p.m., and March 21, 2024, from 10:39 a.m. through 11:15 a.m., revealed Resident 222 sitting in a wheelchair in the common area. The foley catheter bag was not covered and contained urine. Multiple residents and staff were present in the same area during those time periods. During an interview on March 22, 2024, at 10:49 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 222 had a foley catheter without a dignity bag. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 18 sampled residents. (Resident 15) Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 18 sampled residents. (Resident 15) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included pleural effusion, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and lymphedema. Review of the care plan revealed that Resident 15 was at risk for dehydration and weight changes and staff were to monitor weights and report changes to the physician. On November 17, 2023, the physician ordered for the resident to be weighed daily. There was no evidence that weights were obtained on March 4, 7, 9, and 17, 2024. On January 19, 2024, there was an order for staff to notify the physician of a two pound (lb.) weight gain or loss in one day or a five lb. weight change in one week. Review of the resident's weight record revealed that she experienced weight changes of greater than two pounds in one day on the following dates: A loss of 3.6 lbs. from January 31, 2024, through February 1, 2024. A gain of 3.6 lbs. from February 15 through 16, 2024. A loss of 3.8 lbs. from February 18 through 19, 2024. A gain of 4.2 lbs. from February 19 through 20, 2024. A loss of 4.4 lbs. from February 20 through 21, 2024. A gain of 2.6 lbs. from February 26 through 27, 2024. A loss of 4.8 lbs. from March 5 through 6, 2024. There was no evidence that the physician was notified of the weight loss or increase of greater than two lbs. in one day as ordered. In an interview on March 22, 2024, at 11:08 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 15's weights were not obtained as ordered and that the doctor was not notified of the weight changes as ordered. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on March 19, 2024, at 11:50 a.m....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on March 19, 2024, at 11:50 a.m. revealed the following: The bottom row of shelves in the reach-in freezer were missing. Multiple food items were stored on the bottom floor of the freezer. There was a box of raw chicken cheesesteak meat that was open, other food items were stored on top of the box. There was an open bag of French fries that was not dated. The slicer handle was broken. There was a muffin tin and round cake pan stored on top of a transformer. There were two muffin tins on the floor between the storage shelf and the transformer. There was water leaking from the nozzle of a hose behind the kettle while food was being cooked. There was an accumulation of debris under the stovetop and grille. There was cocktail sauce with a use-by date of March 15, 2024, and blue cheese dressing with a use-by date of March 16, 2024, in the walk-in refrigerator. There was a container of popcorn with a use-by date of January 23, 2024, in dry storage. There were two trays of croquettes in the walk-in freezer that were not completely sealed and were open to air. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of transfer(s) in writing upon transfer from the facility for two of two sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 2, 23) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 23 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfer to the hospital. In an interview on March 22, 2024, at 10:36 a.m., the Assistant Administrator confirmed that written notice regarding transfer from the facility was not provided.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Pine Run's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Pine Run Staffed?

CMS rates PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Pine Run?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER during 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Pine Run?

PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 90 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DOYLESTOWN, Pennsylvania.

How Does Pine Run Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pine Run?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Pine Run Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Pine Run Stick Around?

PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Pine Run Ever Fined?

PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Pine Run on Any Federal Watch List?

PINE RUN HEALTH CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.