MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN

ONE MASONIC DRIVE, ELIZABETHTOWN, PA 17022 (717) 367-1121
Non profit - Corporation 453 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
93/100
#79 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Masonic Village at Elizabethtown has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating a high level of quality and care. It ranks #79 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #9 out of 31 in Lancaster County, meaning there are only eight local options that are better. The facility's trend is new, as this is its first inspection on record. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and only 28% turnover, significantly lower than the state average of 46%. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign. However, there are some areas of concern. The facility failed to maintain accurate assessments for two residents, which could affect their care. Additionally, timely behavioral health services were not provided for a resident expressing severe emotional distress. There were also issues with administering pain medications as needed for two residents, which raises questions about pain management protocols. Overall, while the facility shows strong strengths, these concerns should be carefully considered by families.

Trust Score
A
93/100
In Pennsylvania
#79/653
Top 12%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 48 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (28%)

    20 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Pennsylvania's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Dec 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate assessments for two of 35 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate assessments for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents 97 and 108). Findings include: Review of Resident 97's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated November 12, 2024, revealed under Section J - Health Conditions that the resident had two falls with major injury (bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries, or subdural hematomas) since admission/readmission or the prior assessment. Review of Resident 97's clinical record since the resident's admission to the facility on August 13, 2024, failed to reveal evidence of any falls with major injury. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 5, 2024, at approximately 11:00 a.m. confirmed Resident 97 did not have any falls with major injury since being admitted to the facility and that the resident's MDS was coded inaccurately. Review of Resident 108's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident 108 had a significant weight loss and a significant weight gain. Review of Resident 108's clinical record and weight summaries failed to reveal evidence of significant weight loss. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 5, 2024 at 10:58 a.m. confirmed Resident 108 did not have a significant weight loss and that Resident 108's Quarterly MDS was coded inaccurately. 28 Pa. Code: 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were offered in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were offered in a timely manner for one of two residents reviewed for mood and behaviors (Resident 97). Findings include: Review of Resident 97's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety and other symptoms and signs involving emotional state. Review of Resident 97's progress notes revealed a nurse's note on August 14, 2024, which stated, Resident was resting in recliner, resident was crying earlier stating that she was ready to die, she does not want to harm herself but just ready to die. Further review of Resident 97's progress notes revealed a nurse's note on October 4, 2024, which stated, I went in at 10am. to give meds. and resident was still in bed. She said 'I just want to die, I can't get up in the mornings anymore'. I asked her if she feels depressed, she said yes. [Physician] was here and notified. Review of Resident 97's physician progress notes revealed a physician note on October 4, 2024, which stated: I spoke with nursing who reports that patient sometimes wakes up [stating] she does not want to live anymore, and does not want to get out of bed. Further review of the physician note revealed: I did offer her medication, which is not inclined to take, and I agree with her. She does like to have good conversations and appreciates when someone takes the time to listen to her, and I think this will be the best treatment for her. Review of Resident 97's physician's orders revealed an order dated October 18, 2024, for behavioral health (psychology) evaluation and treatment for increased depression and anxiety. Review of Resident 97's progress notes revealed a Behavioral Note from the psychologist on November 27, 2024 to evaluate the resident for depression and anxiety. The delay in obtaining a psychology evaluation for Resident 97 was discussed with and confirmed with the Director of Nursing on December 5, 2024, at approximately 9:30 a.m. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to administer as needed pain medications for appropriate pain levels and prior t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to administer as needed pain medications for appropriate pain levels and prior to non-pharmaceutical interventions for two of 40 residents reviewed. (Residents 42 and 270) Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Pain Assessment and Management Record Procedure, undated, revealed evaluation of pain (pain scale) and alternative interventions are used and documented in conjunction with oral medications. Review of Resident 42's physician orders revealed an order dated June 15, 2023, Hydrocodone (narcotic pain reliever) with Acetaminophen (Tylenol) Tablet 5-325 MG (milligrams); Give 1 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed, for pain/ back/ behavior. A list of interventions are also noted 1-22. Review of Resident 42's Medication Administration Record for September, October, and November 2023 revealed the resident received the medication for undocumentated pain level and undocumented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI's) a total of one time (October 27). Undocumented NPI's a total of five times (September 29, October 1 and 7, and November 5 and 19, 2023). Review of Resident 270's physician orders revealed an order dated July 3, 2023, Tramadol (opioid pain medication) by moth every six hours as needed for chronic back pain; behavior. A list of interventions are noted 1-22. Review of Resident 270's Medication Administration Record for October, November, December 2023, revealed the resident received the medication with undocumented NPI's a total of 18 times (October 6, 7, 14, 21, 22, 28, November 12, 17, 26, 28, December 1, 2, 3, 9, 16, 17, 23, 30, and 31, 2023). Interview with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator on January 24, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. confirmed prn pain medications were not administered with documented NPI's and the prn pain medications for Resident 42 did not include a pain level per policy. 28 Pa Code 211.5 (f) Clinical records 28 Pa code 211.10 (c) Resident care policies 28 Pa. 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Masonic Village At Elizabethtown's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Masonic Village At Elizabethtown Staffed?

CMS rates MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Masonic Village At Elizabethtown?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN during 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Masonic Village At Elizabethtown?

MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 453 certified beds and approximately 303 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a large facility located in ELIZABETHTOWN, Pennsylvania.

How Does Masonic Village At Elizabethtown Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Masonic Village At Elizabethtown?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Masonic Village At Elizabethtown Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Masonic Village At Elizabethtown Stick Around?

Staff at MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 19%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Masonic Village At Elizabethtown Ever Fined?

MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Masonic Village At Elizabethtown on Any Federal Watch List?

MASONIC VILLAGE AT ELIZABETHTOWN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.