KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE

110 FREDONIA ROAD, GREENVILLE, PA 16125 (724) 588-8090
For profit - Corporation 154 Beds PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#60 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Greenville has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended for families seeking care for their loved ones. Ranked #60 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, it is in the top half of state options, and #2 of 10 in Mercer County means there is only one other local facility that performs better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of reported issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is average with a turnover rate of 40%, which is below the state average, and the facility has a commendable record of no fines. While the RN coverage is average, it is important to note some specific concerns: residents were not able to eat all meals in the dining room due to staff shortages, and there were issues with maintaining accurate records for residents undergoing dialysis treatment as well as proper labeling of medications. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses when considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Pennsylvania
#60/653
Top 9%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
6 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 6 deficiencies on record

Jun 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility documents, policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records relating to dialysis (a me...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility documents, policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records relating to dialysis (a medical procedure that filters blood when the kidneys are not functioning properly) communication and failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for residents receiving dialysis for one of one residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R18) Findings include: Review of a Memorandum of Agreement signed 2/22/21, between the facility and Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) revealed the facility shall provide all relevant information to DCI regarding the condition and needs of each resident during his/her dialysis treatment and that DCI shall provide to the facility relevant information regarding each treatment, which may require follow-up care or observation by the facility staff. A facility policy dated 6/2/25, entitled Dialysis Care revealed residents ordered dialysis therapy will be monitored and documentation will be maintained in the medical record and should such information not be received from the Dialysis Provider upon the residents return, the facility shall contact the Dialysis Provider to obtain such medical information. The policy further stated that medication administration times are adjusted to accommodate the schedule for dialysis as well as to achieve maximum therapeutic effect. Resident R18's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/16/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - when the kidneys have permanently lost their ability to function effectively. A person typically requires regular dialysis or a kidney transplant to survive), and respiratory failure (a condition where you don't get enough oxygen, or you get too much carbon dioxide in your body). Resident R18's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 5/16/15, for Dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Resident R18's clinical record lacked evidence of Nursing Facility Dialysis Clinic Communication form being completed for scheduled dialysis treatments completed on 5/21/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25. During an interview on 6/5/25, at 12:39 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that Resident R18's clinical record lacked evidence of dialysis communication for 5/21/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25, and that the facility should have evidence of dialysis communication for each dialysis treatment rendered. Resident R18's clinical record revealed a care plan for dialysis with an intervention to Assure residents medication times does not conflict with dialysis schedule. Review of physician's orders dated 5/16/15, indicated that Resident R18 was to have Amlodipine Besylate (medication for high blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg) daily, Lidocaine External Patch (medication for pain) 4% to lower back applied every morning and removed every evening, Clonidine HCL (medication for high blood pressure) 0.2 mg twice daily, Coreg (medication for high blood pressure) 25 mg twice daily, Pregabalin (medication for nerve pain) 75 mg twice daily, Protonix (medication for acid reflux) 40 mg twice daily, Sevelamer Carbonate Oral Packet (medication used to lower blood phosphate levels) 0.8 grams three times a day with meals, Novolog FlexPen (medication for diabetes) inject 5 units four times a day, and Novolog FlexPen sliding scale (used to determine how much insulin to administer based on your blood glucose levels) four times a day. Further review revealed Physician orders dated 5/20/25, for Creon Delayed Release (medication to treat pancreatitis) 14000-76000 unit three times a day before meals Review of the May and June 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) for 5/17/25, through 6/5/25, revealed that Resident R18 did not receive the following medications as ordered with reason give as Leave of Absence (LOA). Amlodipine Besylate 9:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25. Lidocaine External applied at 9:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25. Clonidine HCL 8:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25. Coreg 8:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25. Pregabalin 9:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, and 6/2/25. Protonix 9:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, and 6/2/25. Sevelamer Carbonate Oral Packet 9:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25, and 1:00 p.m. dose on 5/24/25, and 6/4/25. Novolog FlexPen routinely 8:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/29/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25, and 12:00 p.m. dose on 5/24/25, 5/26/25, and 6/4/25. Novolog FlexPen based on sliding scale 8:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/29/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25, and 12:00 p.m. dose on 5/24/25, 5/28/25, and 6/4/25. Creon Delayed Release 10:00 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 7:30 a.m. dose on 5/21/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25, 5/28/25, 5/30/25, 6/2/25, and 6/4/25, and 11:30 a.m. dose on 5/24/25, and 6/4/25. There was no documentation that the physician was notified of a need to hold or alter the time of administration for the above listed medications for Resident R18 on dialysis days. During an interview on 6/5/25, at 2:14 p.m. the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the above medications for Resident R18 were not administered on dialysis days as ordered by the physician and the clinical record lacked any evidence of physician notification that medications were not administered as ordered. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(viii) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to label one multi-dose vial medication with the resident name, date it was opened, an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to label one multi-dose vial medication with the resident name, date it was opened, and date it should be used by in one of two medication storage rooms observed (Unit One medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Storage of Medications, with a policy review date of 6/2/25, revealed that Medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility policies. No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications are available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed. Drug containers having soiled, illegible, worn, makeshift, incomplete, damaged, or missing labels are relabeled before storing. Observations of the Unit One medication storage room on 6/6/25, at approximately 11:45 a.m. revealed that one multi-dose vial of Tirzepatide (a prescription medication used to manage type two diabetes and for weight loss in adults) was opened and was currently in use, but not labeled with the any resident name, opened date or the use by date. At the time of the observation, Registered Nurse Employee R1 confirmed that the one undated multi-dose vial of Tirzepatide was opened, in use, and should have been labeled with the resident's name, date opened, and use by date. During an interview on 6/6/25, at approximately 12:00 p.m. on 6/6/25, the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the vial was unlabeled and undated and should have that information identified on the vial. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident's personal refrigerators for temperatures for one of one residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident's personal refrigerators for temperatures for one of one residents reviewed with personal refrigerators (Resident R12). Findings include: A facility policy dated 6/2/25, entitled Personal Refrigerators revealed personal refrigerators are permitted after thorough inspection and will be subject to the same monitoring as other facility refrigerators. The policy further stated that the refrigerator must include a thermometer and will be monitored regularly for temperature compliance. Observation on 6/4/25, at 11:30 a.m. revealed Resident R12 had a personal refrigerator in their room. There was no evidence in the room of a temperature log sheet being present. Observation of the inside of the refrigerator revealed that there was no thermometer to monitor the temperature of the refrigerator. During an interview on 6/4/25, at 11:45 a.m. the Assistant Director of Nursing stated that temperatures for resident's personal refrigerators are documented on each resident's electronic medication administration record (EMAR). During an interview on 6/5/25, at 12:30 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E2 stated that any resident with a personal refrigerator was to have a thermometer in it and the nurse was to check and document the temperature on the EMAR every shift. Review of Resident R12's EMAR lacked evidence of any temperatures being monitored and recorded for their personal refrigerator. During an interview on 6/5/25, at 12:40 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Resident R12's personal refrigerator did not contain a thermometer and the facility lacked evidence that the facility was monitoring their refrigerator temperature. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of Licensee
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility documentation and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility documentation and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of serious bodily injury of unknown source for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Abuse Reporting, dated 11/24, revealed that The Facility shall notify the Department of Health, Department of Aging, and Area Agency on Aging, Adult Protective Services, local law enforcement and licensing agencies depending on the circumstances of the allegation or actual event in compliance with Federal and State regulations, including Act 13. Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.12(c) states in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. The clinical record for Resident R1 documented that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (disorganized thinking and confusion) and age related disability. An x-ray report dated March 8, 2025, revealed that Resident R1 had an acute fracture of the left proximal femur bone, (a hip fracture). A facility investigation completed on March 8, 2025, identified that the cause of Resident R1's left hip fracture injury was of unknown origin. Review of information submitted by the facility dated March 10, 2025, to the State Survey Agency disclosed that on March 7, 2025, at 6:20 a.m. Resident R1 complained of leg pain. The physician was notified, an x-ray was ordered and completed that revealed a left hip fracture and required surgical repair which was completed on March 9, 2025. The resident was to return to the facility on March 10, 2025. The report indicated that the resident had not experienced any recent falls at the facility. During interview on March 15, 2025, at approximately 11:15 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident R1's injury of unknown origin was not reported to the State Survey Agency until March 10, 2025. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a)(c) Responsibility of licensee
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications and medicat...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications and medication information on one of four medication carts observed (Unit 1). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Storage of Medications dated 1/24/2023, indicated that compartments containing medications are locked when not in use and carts used to transport such items are not left unattended. Observation on 8/15/23, at approximately 3:50 p.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 prepared medications for a resident from the Unit 1 medication cart parked in the hall in front of the resident room. LPN Employee E1 then proceeded into resident room to administer medications to a resident in the room behind a privacy curtain. LPN Employee E1 did not securely lock the Unit 1 medication cart or cover resident/medication information that was on the computer on top of the medication cart. LPN Employee E1 was unable to view medication cart and drawers of the medication cart or the computer on top of the cart from behind the privacy curtain while unattended. During an interview on 8/15/2023, at the time of the observation, LPN Employee E1 confirmed that he/she left the medication cart unlocked and resident information in view while it was parked in the resident room doorway, which was out of view during administration of medications to a resident behind a privacy curtain. LPN Employee E1 also confirmed that the medication cart was to be locked and resident information covered when out of view. 28. Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28. Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on a review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest prac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on a review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being by not serving all meals in the dining room daily. Findings include: Review of a facility policy, Serving of Food, dated 1/24/23, stated All residents are encouraged to eat in the dining room/s. During resident interviews on 8/16/23, at approximately 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. Residents R6, R10, R22, R25, R29, R37, and R49 indicated they enjoy eating their meals in the dining room with other residents, however, the dining room was not open for dinner on the weekdays and all meals on the weekends. During an interview on 8/16/23, at approximately 2:45 p.m. Dietary Staff Employee E8 indicated the residents do not eat in the dining room for certain meals, such as dinner on the weekdays and all meals on the weekends, due to a lack of nursing staff. During an interview on 8/18/23, at approximately 9:50 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the residents were served meals in the dining room for breakfast and lunch on week days but not on weekends or for the evening meals due to staffing concerns. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • 40% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville Staffed?

CMS rates KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville?

State health inspectors documented 6 deficiencies at KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 6 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville?

KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 154 certified beds and approximately 117 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GREENVILLE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville Stick Around?

KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville Ever Fined?

KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville on Any Federal Watch List?

KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT GREENVILLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.