LANDIS HOMES

1001 EAST OREGON ROAD, LITITZ, PA 17543 (717) 569-3271
Non profit - Corporation 103 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
88/100
#65 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: September 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Landis Homes has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and performs above average among nursing homes. It ranks #65 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #7 out of 31 in Lancaster County, indicating that only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, with issues dropping from 2 in 2022 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, as they received a 5/5 star rating and have a turnover rate of only 25%, significantly lower than the state average of 46%. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, there were some concerning incidents. One resident suffered a scalp laceration due to inadequate supervision, and another experienced a significant medication error related to insulin management. Additionally, there was a failure to follow proper infection control procedures during a COVID-19 outbreak. Overall, Landis Homes shows promise with strong staffing and a good reputation, but prospective families should consider these weaknesses.

Trust Score
B+
88/100
In Pennsylvania
#65/653
Top 9%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 71 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 2 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (25%)

    23 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Pennsylvania's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, clinical record and facility documentation review it was determined the facility failed to ensure tha...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, clinical record and facility documentation review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of 19 residents reviewed was free from accidents by failing to provide adequate supervision resulting in harm to Resident 11 who sustained a scalp laceration. Findings include: Review of Resident 11's diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses Alzheimer's Disease (memory loss, cognitive decline, behavior changes), Vascular Dementia Severe with Mood Disturbances, Vascular Dementia Severe with Agitation, Vascular Dementia Severe with Psychotic Disturbance (group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive function, including memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem solving, severe enough to interfere with daily life), and Lack of Coordination.Review of Resident 11's Care Plan revealed a care focus titled Hygiene Assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) indicating the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit with bathing, dressing, and feeding related to vascular dementia and history of fractures requiring 2-person assistance with transfers, bed mobility, toileting, and bathing, initiated May 5, 2025.Review of Resident 11's Care Plan revealed a care focus titled the Resident is combative and resistive to care related to Dementia. Review of Resident 11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident needs), dated September 15, 2025, revealed Resident 11 was dependent on staff for transfers, showering or bathing.Review of Resident 11's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident has a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 0 indicating severe cognitive functioning.Review of Resident 11's progress notes revealed a nursing note dated September 13, 2025, at 7:38 a.m., indicating Resident 11 was sent out to hospital, 2 assisted to shower room this morning. Once shower started, resident increased behaviors, yelling and threw self out of shower chair. Hit head against wall. Seen laying on right side. 3 assisted up to wheelchair. Large laceration noted to top right head, measures 12x6 cm (centimeters) with flap of skin, unable to approximate. Pressure applied to stop bleeding with ice. Resident did not lose consciousness. Continue with combativeness and aggression. Bleeding noted to stop. Sent to ED (Hospital Emergency Department) at 7:30 a.m. POA (Power of Attorney-person legally authorized to make decisions on behalf of another person) updated per supervisor.Review of Resident 11's hospital discharge report, dated September 13, 2025, revealed a right scalp laceration requiring 26 staples.Review of information dated September 13, 2025 submitted to the state agency revealed Resident 11 fell out of a shower chair on Saturday, September 13, 2025, at 0730 (a.m.) and sustained a laceration with a flap to his/her scalp measuring 12 cm x 6 cm. Resident POA (Power of Attorney) and On-call MD (Medical Director) notified and sent to a Community Hospital for evaluation and sutures. Investigation initiated.Further review of information submitted to the Department on September 13, 2025, revealed under subheading titled Follow-up: staff statements obtained; and according to staff statements they transferred resident with 2-person assist to the shower chair and then took the resident to the spa room where Certified Nurse Aide Employee E4 proceeded to provide the resident with a shower. The resident was combative trying to hit and bite the employee, the employee handed the resident a washcloth in attempts to distract his/her attention, the resident lunged at the employee, causing the resident to fall out of the shower chair. Staff did not follow care plan to have 2 staff present for shower. Staff suspended pending further investigation, [NAME] County Office of Aging Notified. Education to entire team will be provided to follow plan of care, and to stop care if resident is agitated. The resident returned from the hospital with following report: CT (computed tomography) head and cervical spine negative for acute injury. No bleed. Tetanus immunization updated. Laceration repaired. Patient is stable for discharge and outpatient follow-up. Head injury precautions given. PB22 to follow. Resident's BIMs 00/15 Resident will be bed bath with 2-person assist. September 16,2025, PB22s submitted.Review of facility investigation into the injury revealed a witness statement from certified nurse aide Employee E3, dated September 13, 2025, indicating Employee E3 and certified nurse aide Employee E4 both wheeled the resident into the shower room. Employee E3 then told Employee E4 to use the call bell if assistance was required then left the shower room. The call bell rang approximately two minutes later, when Employee E3 returned to the shower room the resident was noted as on the floor bleeding. Employee E5 was called in to assist with getting the resident back into the wheelchair.Review of facility investigation into the injury revealed a witness statement from Employee E4 indicating Employee E4 attempted to shower the resident alone, the resident was trying to bite and grab Employee E4. Employee E4 handed the resident a washcloth so the resident could assist with washing and divert the resident's attention. The resident lunged at Employee E4 causing the resident to fall out of the chair. The emergency button was activated, and additional staff came to assist with getting the resident back into the chair.Review of facility documentation of the investigation into incident revealed a witness statement from licensed nurse Employee E5 indicating Employee E5 was alerted to come into the shower room, observed the resident laying on the floor, blood was noted with shower water running, resident continued with combativeness and agitation. Pressure was applied to the resident's head wound and resident was assisted by 3-persons back into the wheelchair. Resident did not lose consciousness. Resident was sent to emergency room and POA was notified.Phone interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 29, 2025, at 10:47 a.m. confirmed Resident 11 was not appropriately supervised during care, resulting in actual harm when Resident 11 sustained a scalp laceration requiring transfer to the emergency department for suture repair. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
Dec 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from a significant medication error for one of 18 residents reviewed (Res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from a significant medication error for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 31). Findings include: Review of Resident 31's diagnosis list revealed Diabetes (group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period). Review of Resident 31's physician's order dated November 16, 2022, revealed Novolog (fast-acting insulin) nine units with breakfast and dinner and three units with lunch. Hold if the resident does not eat or if blood sugar is below 90. Notify MD for blood sugar below 60 or above 400. Additional review of Resident 31's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated November 17, 2022, revealed When supply is complete, D/C (discontinue) Novolog and start Humalog (fast-acting insulin). Further review of the same form revealed the order was faxed to the pharmacy on November 18, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. The Novolog order was discontinued, and the Humalog order was placed as a draft (order). Review of nursing progress notes dated November 21, 2022, (3:21 a.m.), revealed upon chart checking, the nurse discovered the pharmacy discontinued the Novolog order with the new order (insulin) not being active. The same note revealed that due to this incident, Resident 31 did not receive insulin before meals on November 19, and 20, 2022, missing a total of 6 insulin doses (four doses of Novolog -nine units and two doses of Novolog- three units). Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on November 30, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that due to the resident's insurance, Humalog was substituted for the Novolog order. The DON reported that the resident still had a supply of Novolog insulin in the facility, physician was notified and made an order to discontinue Novolog when completed and then start Humalog. The DON reported per the facility's investigation, licensed Employee E7 faxed the written order to the pharmacy with the intent to update the pharmacy as to when the Novolog insulin will be completed. The DON confirmed no staff member followed up with the pharmacy to indicate the date when the Novolog insulin will be completed and discontinued. The DON reported that the pharmacy discontinued the Novolog insulin and placed the Humalog insulin order into a draft (order) which should have been activated by the nurse on duty. The DON confirmed the nurse did not activate the order resulting in Resident 31 with no active insulin order for November 19, and 20, 2022. The facility failed to ensure Resident 31 was free from a significant medication error. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, observation, review of clinical records and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures during a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, observation, review of clinical records and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures during a COVID-19 outbreak on one of four units reviewed (Ephrata House). Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Interim COVID-19 Visitation Policy, dated October 19, 2022, revealed The core principles of COVID-19 infection, prevention will be adhered to and as follows: Visitors who are unable to adhere to these principles of COVID-10 infection prevention will not be permitted to visit or will be asked to leave. Further review of this policy revealed Visitors will be allowed during outbreak investigations, but visitors will be made aware of the potential risk of visiting during the outbreak investigation and adhere to the core principles of infection prevention. If visiting, during this time, residents and their visitors should wear face coverings or masks during the visits, regardless of vaccination status, and visits should ideally occur in the resident's room. Further review of this policy revealed While an outbreak investigation is occurring, the facility should limit visitor movement in the facility and visitors should go directly to the resident's room or designated visitation area and physically distance themselves from other residents and staff, when possible. Visitors will be notified about the potential for COVID-19 exposure in the facility and adhere to the core principles of COVID-19 infection and prevention, including effective hand hygiene and use of face coverings. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on November 28, 2022, at 9:15 a.m. revealed five residents in Ephrata House were diagnosed as having COVID-19 and the facility was experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19. This interview further revealed PPE requirement for staff and visitors within the facility, including Ephrata House, was surgical masks and goggles/face shields. Observation of Ephrata House personnel on November 28, 2022, at approximately 10:00 a.m. revealed staff members wearing surgical masks and face shields/goggles. Review of Resident 7's clinical progress notes dated November 24, 2022, revealed Resident received visitors this AM. Grandson was among visitors. Caregiver notified that grandson was refusing to wear a mask while in facility. Writer approached grandson and educated at length on reasons why masks are strongly encouraged while in a healthcare facility. Grandson continued to refuse wearing a mask. Visitors currently in resident's room. Supervisor notified. Interview with Licensed Employee E2 on November 29, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. failed to reveal any evidence as to whether the visitor signed in at the kiosk, failed to reveal evidence of any personnel in the reception area, failed to reveal evidence regarding the length of time the visitor was in the facility, failed to reveal evidence of the location of the visitor while in the facility and failed to provide an outcome to the visitor situation that occurred on November 24, 2022. Interview with Licensed Employee E2 on November 30, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. revealed that an additional resident in Ephrata House tested positive for COVID-19 in the evening on November 29, 2022, five days after the November 24, 2022, visitor incident. The interview further revealed that the resident's husband had been notified but no contact tracing had been completed at the time, as the resident had only been diagnosed the previous evening. Review of documentation submitted to State agency regarding the November 29, 2022, positive resident revealed all staff were dedicated to COVID-19 specific residents and all staff were wearing N95 face masks and face shields/goggles. Interview with Licensed Employee E3 on December 1, 2022, at 9:40 a.m. revealed that Licensed Employee E3 had been administering medications to all residents on Ephrata House unit without regard to COVID-19 status. The interview further revealed that dedicated nurse aides were assigned to the COVID-19 positive residents, however, nursing staff was not dedicated. Observation of the Ephrata House staff on December 1, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. revealed staff to be wearing N95 face masks and face shields/goggles. Interview with Nursing Home Administrator on December 1, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. revealed the Ephrata House staff were wearing face shields/goggles and N95 masks at all times and that the survey team was informed about the N95 masks upon entrance. The survey team was informed, upon entrance, that PPE requirements in the entire building were surgical masks and goggles. The interview further revealed that after the supervisor was notified of the visitor on November 24, 2022, the supervisor arrived on the unit to find that the visitor had left the immediate unit. The interview failed to reveal where the visitor went within the facility and no monitoring of this visitor occurred during the visit. No further information was available or provided regarding this incident. The facility failed to follow COVID-19 policies and procedures and failed to adequately ensure the safety of additional residents from COVID-19 infection during an outbreak at the facility. 28 Pa Code 211.10(a)(d) Resident Care policies 28 Pa Code 211.12(a)(c)(d)(4)(5) Nursing Services
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • 3 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Landis Homes's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LANDIS HOMES an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Landis Homes Staffed?

CMS rates LANDIS HOMES's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Landis Homes?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at LANDIS HOMES during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 2 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Landis Homes?

LANDIS HOMES is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 103 certified beds and approximately 96 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in LITITZ, Pennsylvania.

How Does Landis Homes Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, LANDIS HOMES's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Landis Homes?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Landis Homes Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LANDIS HOMES has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Landis Homes Stick Around?

Staff at LANDIS HOMES tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 18%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Landis Homes Ever Fined?

LANDIS HOMES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Landis Homes on Any Federal Watch List?

LANDIS HOMES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.