MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Mt. Hope Nazarene Retirement Community has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families considering options. It ranks #91 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, putting it in the top half of the state, and #11 out of 31 in Lancaster County, indicating that only a handful of local facilities are better. The facility's trend is stable, with 14 issues identified in both 2023 and 2024, suggesting consistency in performance, though it's important to note that all identified issues were minor and did not pose serious harm. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 36%, which is lower than the state average, a positive sign that staff members are likely to remain and build relationships with residents. On the downside, the facility has had some concerns, such as failing to update care plans for two residents and not adequately informing others about available services and associated costs. Additionally, there was a lack of required postings regarding state agencies and advocacy groups. While there are some areas needing attention, the overall care quality and staffing stability are encouraging for families considering this home.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Pennsylvania
- #91/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 41 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
10pts below Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 13 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to be treated with respect, dignity, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the resident assessment for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Findings ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, facility documentation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure multi-use medications were dated upon opening for one of two me...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, product manufacturer label, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than 5 percent.
Findings include:
Based on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0575
(Tag F0575)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post a list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is informed periodically during the resident's stay of services available in the facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify residents individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a risk benefit analysis and obtain consent for use of an enabler bar for three of three residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct regula...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- • 36% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community Staffed?
CMS rates MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY during 2022 to 2024. These included: 14 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community?
MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MANHEIM, Pennsylvania.
How Does Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community Stick Around?
MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community Ever Fined?
MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Mt Hope Nazarene Retirement Community on Any Federal Watch List?
MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.