MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU

1034 GROVE STREET, MEADVILLE, PA 16335 (814) 333-5961
Non profit - Corporation 32 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
78/100
#83 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Meadville Medical Center Transitional Care Unit has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good option for families considering care for their loved ones. It ranks #83 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half of providers statewide, and is the best option among six facilities in Crawford County. The facility is improving overall, with issues decreasing from two in 2023 to one in 2024. However, staffing is a significant concern, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 78%, which is much higher than the state average of 46%. There are also some concerning incidents noted in inspections, such as a failure to store ice safely, which could pose a health risk, and a delay in investigating an injury involving a resident. Additionally, the facility has not had a full-time registered nurse as Director of Nursing since October 2023, which could impact the quality of care provided. On the positive side, the center has excellent RN coverage, exceeding 94% of other facilities in Pennsylvania, which is crucial for catching issues that might be overlooked by aides.

Trust Score
B
78/100
In Pennsylvania
#83/653
Top 12%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
78% turnover. Very high, 30 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$7,172 in fines. Higher than 80% of Pennsylvania facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 109 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 78%

32pts above Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $7,172

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Staff turnover is very high (78%)

30 points above Pennsylvania average of 48%

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an incident with injury in a timely manner for one of 10...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an incident with injury in a timely manner for one of 10 residents reviewed (Residents R78). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Abuse Policy of the Transitional Care Unit dated 11/08/2024, revealed that, all investigations shall be comprehensive and responsive and shall occur promptly after notification of an alleged abuse . Review of facility policy entitled Accidents and Incident Reports dated 11/08/24, revealed a written report shall be made of any accident or incident in which a resident is involved in the facility . Review of Resident R78's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/25/2024, with diagnoses that included arthritis, pain in right hip, and infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right hip prosthesis (artificial hip joint). Review of Resident R78's clinical record revealed a progress note dated 7/07/2024, that indicated Resident R78 was sitting on his/her buttocks in front of wheelchair. It was reported by a Nurse Aide that Resident R78 had stood up and was attempting to transfer into bed independently with the call bell alarming. The Nurse Aide in response to the call bell, assisted Resident R78 and their knees buckled causing the resident to fall to the floor. Resident R78 was assessed with complaint of pain to the left lower leg. An order was received from the physician to transfer Resident R78 to the hospital. Resident R78 returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of fractured left femur. Review of Resident R78's clinical record and incident documentation revealed a lack of evidence that an investigation was completed. Further review of the clinical record and facility documentation lacked evidence of interviews from staff present at the time of the incident or handwritten statements from staff of the incident investigation to ensure the resident was free from abuse and/or neglect. During an interview on 11/14/2024, at 10:40 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that there was a lack of a thorough investigation completed on Resident R78's incident with injury. The NHA also confirmed that all incidents should be investigated which included obtaining written statements. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of position description and job duties and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse was employed as th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of position description and job duties and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse was employed as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis since October 26, 2023. Findings include: Review of the position description section for the Director of Nursing - (DON) revealed that the role of the DON includes to coordinate total nursing care for residents using nursing standards and the nursing process in accordance with current Federal, State, and Local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern the Long Tern Care Facility to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. The Job Duties for the DON included to promote an environment in which the resident care team can work cooperatively toward objectives, directs, supervises, delegates and evaluates all nursing care provided to the residents by using professional skills and judgements. Functions as clinical and managerial resource to guide and validate the independent decision making of staff. Review of information submitted by the facility regarding a change in the DON position revealed that Employee EI began as the DON on November 6, 2023. During an interview on December 13, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. DON Employee E1 reported he/she was serving as the temporary DON while they work to fulfill the job with a permanent employee. Employee E1 reported that they also work as the Nursing Supervisor in the acute care hospital two to three days a week. During an interview on December 13, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Employee E1 assumed the DON role on November 6, 2023, and the former DON's last day worked was on October 26, 2023. The NHA also confirmed that the current DON does not work on a full-time basis as they also work as the Nursing Supervisor in the acute care hospital two to three days a week. 28 Pa Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of license 28 Pa Code 211.12 (b) Nursing Services
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of manufacturer's guidelines, facility records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe storage of ice for residents for one of one i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of manufacturer's guidelines, facility records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain safe storage of ice for residents for one of one ice machines located in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for the Kold-Draft GT & GB Models (ice machine) revealed that Individual drains must never be directly connected to a common manifold, drain, or standpipe. If individual drains are to be discharged into a common manifold, drain, or standpipe, a minimum one and half-inch air gap must be provided at each connection. This is to prevent any backflow or back-siphoning of drain water into the ice maker or ice bin. Review of ice machine maintenance records provided by the facility on 12/12/23, indicated that the ice machine was last serviced and cleaned on 9/25/23. Observation on 12/11/23, at 11:14 a.m. revealed a black, slimy substance on the outside of the white plastic drainpipe from the bottom of the ice bin. The bottom edge of the pipe was resting against the top edge of the drainpipe to the floor, and there was black, slimy substance on the inside edge of the drainpipe to the floor, and there was no one and half-inch air gap. During an interview on 12/11/23, at 11:14 a.m. the Dietary Manager confirmed the presence of the black, slimy substance on both pipes and that the pipes were resting together. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 1:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the presence of the black, slimy substance; the edges of the pipes were touching; the ice machine was last cleaned on 9/25/23; and that the ice machine piping was dirty and should have been cleaned and measures taken to prevent the development of the black, slimy substance. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • 78% turnover. Very high, 30 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu Staffed?

CMS rates MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 78%, which is 32 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU during 2023 to 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu?

MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 32 certified beds and approximately 18 residents (about 56% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MEADVILLE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (78%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu Stick Around?

Staff turnover at MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU is high. At 78%, the facility is 32 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 62%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu Ever Fined?

MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU has been fined $7,172 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,151. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Meadville Medical Ctr Tcu on Any Federal Watch List?

MEADVILLE MEDICAL CTR TCU is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.