COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Courtyard Gardens Nursing and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families, as this grade suggests solid quality but not elite status. Ranked #166 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, it is in the top half, and #2 out of 8 in Dauphin County, meaning there is only one local option rated higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 7 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is average, with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 50%, which is on par with the state average. However, the facility has incurred $12,315 in fines, which raises some concern about compliance issues. While there are strengths, such as a good overall health inspection rating of 4/5, there are significant weaknesses as well. For example, the facility failed to develop a water management program to prevent bacteria like Legionella, which poses a serious health risk. Additionally, there were violations related to food safety, including improper storage of expired items and failure to label perishable foods correctly. Lastly, there was a concern regarding the accuracy of resident assessments, which is crucial for ensuring appropriate care. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Pennsylvania
- #166/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $12,315 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident status for one of 19 residents revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for three of 21 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consis...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is informed of the items and services for which the resident may be charged and the am...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on state regulations, surveyor observation, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 38 and 53).
Findings Inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on facility policy review, observations, product label review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages in accordance with professional standa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on document review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop a Water Management Program for the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, such ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post daily current staffing and census for the following dates: October 31, 2023; November 1, 2, 4, and 5, 2023....
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, policy review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received care and treatments consistent with p...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a basel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $12,315 in fines. Above average for Pennsylvania. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr?
COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 102 certified beds and approximately 91 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MIDDLETOWN, Pennsylvania.
How Does Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr Stick Around?
COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr Ever Fined?
COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR has been fined $12,315 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,202. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Courtyard Gardens Nursing And Rehab Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
COURTYARD GARDENS NURSING AND REHAB CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.