MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING

30 OLD SCHUYLKILL ROAD, POTTSTOWN, PA 19465 (610) 705-3700
For profit - Limited Liability company 133 Beds MORDECHAI WEISZ Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
60/100
#76 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Manatawny Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating that it is slightly above average but not outstanding. It ranks #76 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 20 in Chester County, suggesting only four local options are better. The facility is showing an improving trend, having reduced its issues from 7 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a concern with a 57% turnover rate, above the state average, and while RN coverage is average, the presence of experienced staff is crucial for resident care. Notably, the facility has incurred $44,985 in fines, which is higher than 82% of Pennsylvania facilities, indicating ongoing compliance challenges. Specific incidents include failures to properly monitor and treat pressure ulcers, resulting in harm to residents, which is a significant concern for families considering care options. Overall, while there are strengths in its ratings and improving trend, the facility's staffing issues and serious incidents related to resident care warrant careful consideration.

Trust Score
C+
60/100
In Pennsylvania
#76/653
Top 11%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$44,985 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 57%

11pts above Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $44,985

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: MORDECHAI WEISZ

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (57%)

9 points above Pennsylvania average of 48%

The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Jan 2025 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for one of the four units observed (Milestone Unit). Findings include: An observation on the Milestone unit conducted on January 28, 2025, revealed the following: At 11:51 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with two holes measuring 3.0 x 5.0 inches and the other hole measuring 2.0 x 5.0 inches; 11:58 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with one hole measuring 5.0 x 7.0 inches; and at 12:01 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall by the window was observed with two holes one measuring 2.0 x 11 inches and the other was 2.0 x 2.0 inches. An observation conducted on January 31, 2025, at 11:20 a.m., in the presence of Employee E3 revealed that the above observations on Milestone unit rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were still present. An interview conducted with Employee E3 on January 31, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that he/she was not aware nor informed of the holes in the walls in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The above findings were discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator on January 31, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. The facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment in the Milestone Unit. 28Pa Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28Pa Code 201.18(b)(e)(1)Management
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 22 and 108). Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 22 and 108). Findings include: Review of Resident 22's CRNP's (certified registered nurse practitioner) progress note of January 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was seen and examined for complaints of urinary retention. New order to insert foley catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) if needing straight catheterization (intermittent emptying of urine from the bladder using a small tube) for all three shifts. Additional progress note of January 10, 2025, revealed that a foley catheter was inserted for urinary retention. Review of CRNP progress note of January 21, 2025, revealed an order to remove the resident's catheter and complete a bladder scan (procedure used to assess the amount of urine retained within the bladder) every shift for three days related to a voiding trial. Review of progress note of January 22, 2025, revealed resident continues to retain urine per bladder scan and foley catheter placed as ordered. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on January 31, 2025, at 1:13 p.m. confirmed that a care plan had not been developed for urinary retention or a foley catheter. Review of Resident 108's CRNP progress notes dated January 30, 2025 revealed Patient seen and examined today to review labs drawn yesterday and to follow up on CHF [congestive heart failure - excessive body/lung fluid caused by a weakened heart muscle]. Further review of Resident 108's CRNP progress notes dated January 30, 2025 revealed [resident] has been taking Furosemide [Lasix - diuretic used to reduce fluid] 20 mg [milligrams] daily x 3 days. Given only mild decrease, will increase Furosemide. [Resident] continues with edema to right elbow. Review of Resident 108's care plan failed to reveal evidence of a care plan for the increase in Lasix and failed to reveal evidence of a care plan for right elbow edema. Interview with Director of Nursing on January 31, 2025 at 9:45 a.m. confirmed that no care plan existed for Resident 108's right elbow edema and also confirmed there was no care plan for Resident 108's increase in Lasix. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records Previously cited 2/15/24 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 2/15/24
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect changes in nutrition for a resident with weight loss for one of 25 residents reviewed (Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect changes in nutrition for a resident with weight loss for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: Review of Resident 84's clinical record revealed between December 14, 2024 and January 6, 2025 Resident 84 had a 5.89 % weight loss. Further review of the clinical record revealed weight warning note from the dietitian dated January 6, 2025 identifying the weight loss and suggesting adding pudding to lunch and dinner and to also add desert for additional calories. Review of Resident 84's care plan failed to reveal that the care plan was revised to include the changes in nutrition from the dietitian. Interview with Director of Nursing on January 31, 2025 at 9:45 a.m. confirmed that the care plan was not revised to include changes from the dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records Previously cited 4/30/24, 3/8/24 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 6/11/24, 4/30/24, 3/8/24
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that necessary treatments were provided for two of five residents with a pressure ulcer (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that necessary treatments were provided for two of five residents with a pressure ulcer (Residents 71 and 177). Findings include: Review of Resident 71's wound consult of January 27, 2025, revealed resident presented with a stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss) of the left heel. The consult indicated a new order recommendation to cleanse with wound cleanser, apply betadine (antiseptic solution used to disinfect open wounds), and leave open to air daily and prn (as needed). Review of the physician's orders and TAR (treatment administration record) revealed that the order was not implemented. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on January 31, 2025, at 11:17 a.m. confirmed that the treatment order was changed during wound rounds, but the order was not put into place. Review of Resident 177's wound consult of January 20, 2025, revealed resident presented with a stage 2 pressure ulcer (shallow wound with partial thickness skin loss) of the sacrum (large, triangular bone at the base of the spine). The consult indicated a new order recommendation to clean with wound cleanser, apply house barrier cream, and leave open to air daily and prn. Review of the physician's orders and TAR revealed that the order was not implemented. Interview with the DON and Nursing Home Administrator on January 31, 2025, at 1:05 p.m. confirmed that the order to change the treatment was not implemented. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records Previously cited 2/15/24 28. Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 2/15/24
Feb 2024 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for two...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for two of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 182 and 183) Findings Include: Review of Resident 182's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 182's Nursing admission screener, dated February 2, 2024 revealed the resident should have had a basic care plan for Activities of Daily living, Allergies, Communication, Discharge planning, falls, neurological, oral/nutrition, skin, sleep pattern, and smoking cessation. Review of Resident 182's care plan revealed the only care plan initiated in the 48 hours after admission was a nutrition care plan. All other care plans were initiated between February 5th and February 12, 2024. Review of Resident 183's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 183's Nursing admission screener, dated February 1, 2024 revealed the resident should have had a basic care plan for Activities of Daily living, Allergies, Communication, Discharge planning, falls, neurological, oral/nutrition, skin, sleep pattern, and smoking cessation. Review of Resident 183's care plan revealed the only care plan initiated in the 48 hours after admission was a nutrition care plan. All other care plans were initiated between February 8th and 11th 2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 15, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. revealed Residents 182 and 183 did not have an initial care plan developed on admission. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services for pressure ulcer for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findings Inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services for pressure ulcer for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findings Include: Review of Resident 21's admission Nursing Assessment, dated January 16, 2024 revealed there was a stage 1 pressure ulcer (intact reddened skin), measuring 3 centimeter (cm), 1cm wide and 1cm deep on the coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spinal column). Review of Resident 21's physician orders on admission revealed there was no order for wound care to this wound. Review of Resident 21's wound consult note, dated January 24, 2024 revealed the resident had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (extend through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but do not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) measuring 2cm long, 1cm wide, and 0.2cm deep. The wound specialist recommended a treatment of Triad paste and to leave open to air daily. Review of Resident 21's physician orders revealed the triad paste as recommend by the wound specialist was not ordered for Resident 21 and they continued to have no treatment on the wound. Review of Resident 21's wound consultant note, dated January 31, 2024, revealed the resident had a stage 3 pressure ulcer measuring 0.5cm long, 0.5cm wide, and 0.1cm deep. The wound specialist recommended a treatment of Triad paste and to leave open to air daily. Review of Resident 21's physician orders revealed the triad paste as recommend by the wound specialist was not ordered for Resident 21 and they continued to have no treatment on the wound. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Licensed Nursing Employee E4 on February 15, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. revealed when Resident 21 was admitted to the facility the pressure ulcer identified was incorrectly assessed as a stage one due to the measurement of depth and the facility failed to provide wound care to the wound upon admission and when recommended by the wound consultant on January 24th and January 30, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was de...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper continence care for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 70). Findings include: Review of Resident 70's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including Encounter for attention to gastrostomy (tube feed- artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support or gastric decompression), Scoliosis (sideways curvature of the spine or back bone), Intellectual disability (a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities necessary for living independently). Continued review revealed that the resident was dependent for toileting hygiene. Further review revealed that the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident 70's care plan revealed the following intervention for potential for constipation: Bowel meds as ordered and Following facility bowel protocol for episode of constipation with a date initiated of April 20, 2022. Further review of Resident 70's clinical medical record revealed an order for Milk of Magnesia (used to treat occasional constipation) 400MG/5ML, Give 30 ml orally as needed for Constipation ON 3-11 SHIFT IF NO BOWEL MOVEMENT BY THE EVENING OF 3RD DAY. Review of Resident 70's bowel function (task used to track bowel movement) from January 17, 2024, through February 14, 2024, revealed Resident 70 did not have a bowel movement on the following days: January 18, 2024, January 19, 2024, January 20, 2024 January 22, 2024, January 23, 2024, January 24, 2024 February 1, 2024, February 2, 2024, February 3, 2024 February 5, 2024, February 6, 2024, February 7, 2024 Review of Resident 70's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) revealed the facility did not administer Milk of Magnesia on the evenings of January 20, 2024, January 24, 2024, February 3, 2024, or February 7, 2024. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 15, 2024, at 1:15 p.m. confirmed Resident 70 did not receive Milk of Magnesia on the dates listed above. 28 Pa Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and address weight loss in a timely manner for two of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and address weight loss in a timely manner for two of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 105 and 112). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Weight Assessment and Intervention, undated, revealed: Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the Dietitian in writing. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. Review of Resident 105's clinical record revealed on October 11, 2023, the resident was recorded as weighing 334.6 pounds (lbs.) On November 1, 2023, the resident was recorded as weighing 305 lbs., a 29.6 lb., or 8.85% weight loss in three weeks. Further review of Resident 105's weights revealed the next available weight was recorded on November 8, 2023, at 293.3 lbs. Review of Resident 105's progress notes revealed a Weight Note on November 17, 2023, where the dietitian, Employee E5, requested a reweight be obtained. Further review of Resident 105's weights revealed the next weight obtained was on November 21, 2023, with the resident recorded as weighing 278.6 lbs. Further review of Resident 105's progress notes revealed the physician was notified of Resident 105's weight loss on December 6, 2023, and requested the resident's fluid restrictions be discontinued and the resident started on comfort measures. The delay in obtaining a reweight to verify Resident 105's weight loss and the delay in the dietitian and physician being made aware of Resident 105's significant weight loss was discussed with the dietitian, Employee E5, on February 15, 2024, at approximately 11:15 a.m. Review of Resident 112's clinical record revealed that on December 20, 2023, the resident weighed 135.2 lbs. On December 27, 2023, the resident weighed 127.3 pounds which is a 5.84 % loss in one week. Further review of Resident 112's weights revealed the next recorded weight was January 2, 2024, where the resident was recorded as weighing 124.9 lbs. Review of Resident 112's progress notes revealed the Dietitian, Employee E5, did not address the resident's weight loss until January 9, 2024, where they documented that the resident was currently on antibiotic therapy for a urinary tract infection. Further review of Resident 112's progress notes revealed the next Weight Note was on January 26, 2024, where the Dietitian, Employee E5, stated that Resident 112 had a 6.5% weight loss since December 20, 2023. The dietitian recommended nursing notify the physician and that Resident 112 be started on a supplement. The delay in obtaining a reweight for Resident 112 and the delay in addressing Resident 112's significant weight loss was discussed with the dietitian, Employee E5, on February 15, 2024, at approximately 11:15 a.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services 28 Pa Code: 211.10(c) Resident care policies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacy provided medications timely for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 80) and failed to provide record of disposition of a controlled drug for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 130). Findings include: Review of Resident 80's clinical medical record revealed the following diagnoses: Encephalopathy Unspecified (a disease that affects brain structure or function. It causes altered mental state and confusion.), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA- Infections caused by specific bacteria that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics), Sepsis (occurs when the body's immune response to an infection causes widespread inflammation, damaging its own tissues and organs.), UTI (urinary tract infection). Review of Resident 80's comprehensive assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated [DATE], in section O (special treatments, procedures, and programs) revealed Resident 80 was receiving IV medications (intravenous injection is an injection of medication or another substance into a vein and directly into the blood stream). Further review revealed Resident 80 was also receiving antibiotics (medicines that fight bacterial infections in people). Additional review of Resident 80's clinical record revealed an order for Vancomycin (antibiotic used to treat bacteria) 500 mg (milligrams) IV Q8 (every 8 hours) for 7 days with a start date of [DATE], and an end date of [DATE]. Review of Resident 80's clinical medical record revealed a progress note dated [DATE], stating as per md (medical doctor) extended iv vancomycin through [DATE], due to missed doses regarding to pharmacy. Further review of Resident 80's progress notes revealed a note dated [DATE], stating Vancomycin HCl Intravenous Solution Use 500 mg intravenously every 8 hours for MRSA urine until January, 5, 2024, 11:59 p.m. SASH protocol with med (medications) administration unavailable. Review of Resident 80's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) revealed Resident 80 missed two doses of Vancomycin. The first missed dose was on [DATE], and the second dose was on [DATE]. Review of closed record revealed Resident 130 was admitted to Manatawny Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing on [DATE], and expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident 130's clinical medical record revealed an order for Morphine Sulfate (medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) solution 20 ML (milliliters) with a start date of [DATE]. Further review of Resident 130's clinical medical record failed to find documentation of disposition (disposal) of Resident 130's morphine Sulfate. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 15, 2024, at 11: 50 a.m. confirmed the above information. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code: 211.9 (a)(1) Pharmacy services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Laboratory Services (Tag F0770)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findings Include: Rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findings Include: Review of Resident 21's physician orders revealed an order dated January 25, 2024 for a PT/INR (blood test to determined how fast blood clots) every Thursday for monitoring Coumadin (blood thinner). Review of the clinical record revealed there was no PT/INR drawn on Thursday February 8, 2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 14, 2023 at 11:30 a.m. confirmed resident 21 did not have a PT/INR drawn on Thursday February 8th, 2024 as ordered. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d) (1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0773 (Tag F0773)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to report results of laboratory studies to the physician for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to report results of laboratory studies to the physician for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 21) Findings Include: Review of Resident 21's progress notes revealed a nursing entry dated January 23, 2024 at 9:43 p.m. stating INR 5.5 (lab resulting indicating how long it takes for blood to clot) new order obtained to hold warfarin (blood thinner) dose and recheck on January 25, 2024. Review of Resident 21's labs revealed a PT/INR was drawn on January 25th 2024 and the results were reported to the facility on the same day. Review of Resident 21's clinical record revealed the results of the PT/INR drawn on January 25, 2024 were not reported to the physician until January 29, 2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 14, 2023 at 11:30 p.m. confirmed the lab result from January 25, 2024 were not reported to the physician until January 29, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d) (1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Oct 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record, facility policy and procedure, hospital record reviews and staff interview, it was determined the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record, facility policy and procedure, hospital record reviews and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to monitor and assess a pressure ulcer present upon readmission causing actual harm to Resident 1 when the wound deteriorated and became infected causing septic shock for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcer/Injuries, revised July 2017, revealed conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon admission, including skin integrity- any evidence of existing or developing pressure ulcers or injuries. Skin assessments should be done weekly by a licensed nurse. Inspect the skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or ADLs. Review of Resident 1's clinical progress notes revealed nursing entry dated August 17, 2023 at 7:15 p.m. stating Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital and the left buttock noted to have an open area 1.2 x 1 x 4. Other wounds noted upon admission included the residents left foot, left ankle, right foot, and excoriation (skin becomes red and often painful and begins to come off) to the buttock and sacrum (bone at the base of the spine in the middle of the lower back). Further review of Resident 1's clinical record including readmission documentation failed to document condition, or stage for wound of the left buttock. Review of Resident 1's documentation from the hospital upon readmission to the facility on August 17, 2023 revealed the resident had left ischial (lower and back region of the hip bone) deep tissue injury (DTI-an injury to the soft tissue under the skin due to pressure and is usually over bony prominence). Review of Resident 1's Nursing Admit/Readmit assessment, dated August 17, 2023, the skin integrity section had no documentation of wounds with a comments section stating left buttocks measuring 1.2 x 1 x 4. Additional review of Resident 1's assessments revealed Weekly Skin assessments completed on August 20, 2023, September 2, 2023, September 10, 2023 and September 14, 2023. Review of Resident 1's skin assessments mentioned above revealed in the section for observation of skin wound or open ulcers (indicate even if being treated) were documented as no indicating the resident had no current wound. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a Skin/Wound note dated August 29, 2023 at 1:29 p.m. revealed the other wounds noted upon readmission were addressed but failed to mention the left ischial wound documented on admission. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a Skin/Wound note dated September 9, 2023 at 2:26 p.m. stating wound rounds with wound physician assessed sacrum MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage- superficial irritation and damage caused by long term exposure to moisture) continue current tx (treatment) and interventions. Further review of Skin/Wound note dated September 9, 2023 failed to mention the left ischial wound documented on admission. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a Skin/Wound note dated September 12, 2023 at 1:16 p.m. revealed the wounds the resident was admitted with were addressed but failed to indicate the left ischial wound documented on admission. Review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a nursing note dated September 13, 2023 at 11:21 p.m. stating L (left) ischium wound measuring 2.8x4x2, wound bed with slough (dead tissue with a yellow/white color that can be wet or dry) and necrosis (dead tissue) and moderate drainage. Wound cleansed with NSS (Normal Saline Solution- sterile salt water), gently packed with hydrogel gauze (used to keep the wound moist to promote healing), applied triad (paste applied directly to skin to provide protection to area) to peri (surrounding) wound and covered with border gauze (sterile gauze with adhesive surrounding to hold to the skin). Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence whether the wound had a deterioration documented in the same location on admission or identified a new wound. Review of the entire clinical record revealed there was no physician's order for the wound care provided as stated in the progress note of September 13, 2023 and no documented evidence the physician was notified of the wound status. Further review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a Skin/Wound note dated September 14. 2023 stating wound rounds with wound physician .assessed left ischium/buttock area. Review of the wound physician consult report, dated September 14, 2023 revealed left buttock is an Unstageable pressure ulcer injury (bed sore that occurs due to prolonged pressure on a specific area where the depth of the wound or bed sore is completely obscured by eschar in the wound bed) .measurements are 2cm (centimeter) length x 3cm width x 2cm depth .there is moderate amount of sero-sanguineous (thin watery fluid pick or red in color due to presence of blood) drainage noted which has no odor) with 100% slough. Further review of Resident 1's progress notes revealed a nursing entry dated September 19, 2023 at 5:40 p.m. stating assessed the resident and noted temperature 102.3 resident diaphoretic (sweating). Resident B/P (Blood Pressure) has been running low, call placed to 911 to send to hospital. Review of Resident 1's hospital documentation from his admission on [DATE] revealed an Infection Disease consult on September 20, 2023 at 9:34 a.m. with an impression of septic shock/severe sepsis (widespread infection causing organ failure and dangerously low blood pressure) secondary to presumed infected left buttock and sacral decubitus ulcer (pressure ulcer) with probable osteomyelitis (infection of the bone). Stage 4 (extend below the subcutaneous fat into your deep tissues, including muscle, tendons, and ligaments) left buttock/sacral decubitus ulcer/presumed osteomyelitis I believe the patient has severe sepsis to primarily be from secondary to his necrotic stage 4 sacral and left gluteal wound which will need debridement (surgical removal of dead tissue) as soon as possible- hopefully once he is more hemodynamically stable (the blood pressure and heart rate are at safe levels). Interview with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator on October 3, 2023 at 1:00 p.m. confirmed the resident clinical record has no complete documentation of the wound upon readmission from the hospital on August 17, 2023 until seen by the wound consultant on September 14, 2023 which the ischial wound was documented as an unstable wound and a larger size then what was documented on readmission. The facility failed to thoroughly assess Resident 1's wound upon readmission from the hospital on August 17, 2023 so a clinical baseline was unable to be established to determine the need of changes to the status of the residents wound to determine proper care of the wound. The facility also failed to assess weekly, per policy, to determine the appropriateness of the current wound treatment and whether healing was being achieved or not. This caused harm to Resident 1 when they were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of septic shock and osteomyelitis secondary to a presumed infected stage four pressure ulcer present when admitted to the hospital needing surgical debridement when stable. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident Care Policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Aug 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and interviews with the staff it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician ord...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and interviews with the staff it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CL1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following but not limited to, diagnosis: severe aortic stenosis (is the narrowing of the exit of the left ventricle of the heart (where the aorta begins), ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (a weakened area in the body's main artery in the chest) and chronic interstitial lung fibrosis (A group of lung conditions that causes scarring) and pneumonia. Further review of the clinical record a nursing note dated [DATE], states that Resident CL1, met with palliative medicine prior to hospital discharge and elected DNR (do not resuscitate) status. Review of the POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Self-Sustaining Treatment) revealed on [DATE], the spouse signed it and marked that Resident CL1 is a DNR. The CRNP also signed the document. A nursing note dated [DATE], that the resident was not breathing with no pulse. CPR was initiated. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing was conducted on [DATE] at 1:15 a.m., confirmed that CPR should not have been started on Resident CL1 due to the DNR status. The facility failed to follow physician orders for Resident CL1. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
Apr 2023 9 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for three of 10 re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for three of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 16, and 99) causing actual harm of a Stage 3 and two unstageable Pressure ulcers for Resident 12. Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Pressure Ulcers/ Skin Breakdown- Clinical Protocol, Revised March 2014, revealed the nursing staff and Attending Physician will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure sores, for example, immobility. Review of Resident R12's significant change MDS (periodic assessment of resident needs) dated February 6, 2023 revealed the resident was recently placed on hospice service (end of life care) and determined to be at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Review of Resident 12's Progress Notes revealed a nursing note on January 8, 2023 at 10:37 a.m. stating x-ray results received and show suspected right femur fracture, RP (Responsible Party) notified and requested to be sent to the ER (Emergency Room). Review of documentation from the hospital stay revealed Resident 12 was seen by an Orthopedic physician on January 9, 2023 due to fracture of the right distal femur (knee). They were going to continue with conservative measures with bracing. Review of Resident 12's Progress Notes revealed a nursing note dated January 11, 2023 at 9:41 p.m. stating patient re-admitted at 5: 15 p.m. from the hospital with Fx (fracture) Femur .brace to right knee to be worn at all times. Review of Resident 12's physician orders revealed an order dated January 12, 2023 for RT (right) leg immobilizer on at all times, observe for redness or skin integrity. Review of Resident 12's Skin Integrity care plan failed to reveal goal/interventions to address newly ordered leg immobilizer or monitoring of right leg for redness and skin integrity under the immobilizer. Review of Resident 12's Medication and Treatment Administration Records for January, February, and March 2023 failed to reveal any skin integrity or redness observation documentation. Review of Resident 12's Progress Notes revealed a nursing note dated April 6, 2023 at 5:39 p.m. revealed open R (right) knee areas and posterior (back) ankle areas observed under residents leg brace Review of Resident 12's Weekly Wound Observation Tool dated April 6, 2023 at 3:48 p.m. revealed an unstageable pressure wound (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) on the top of the right knee cap that was 40% slough (dead white or yellow tissue) with a small amount of bloody drainage that was 5 centimeters wide and 4 centimeter long. Another wound on the right side of the kneecap was an unstageable pressure wound that was 40% slough and was 4 centimeters wide and 4 centimeters long with no drainage. Another wound on the posterior right ankle was a stage 3 (full-thickness skin loss potentially extending into the subcutaneous (fat) tissue layer), there was no description of the wound base on the assessment, with no drainage and 3 centimeters long and 2 centimeters wide. Interview with Licensed Nursing Employee E5 on April 12, 2023 at 11:32 a.m. revealed the wounds that were found on Resident 12's knee and ankle were significant wounds that were caused by pressure of the brace. Employee E5 further stated staff would be expected to remove the brace twice a day to check for skin integrity but there was no documented evidence this was occurring as expected. Interview with Licensed Physical Therapy Employee E6 on April 13, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed they were not consulted until after the wounds were discovered. Employee E6 further stated that the type of immobilizer Resident 12 was wearing had straps that could be undone to allow staff to check Resident 12 skin integrity under the immobilizer as needed. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E7 on April 13, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. revealed he/she was currently assigned to Resident 12 and had been assigned to Resident 12 prior to the development of the pressure ulcers. Employee E7 reported he/she did not check under Resident 12's immobilizer for skin integrity because there was no order in the system to do so. Interview with Licensed Nursing Employee E4 on April 13, 2023 at 12:30 p.m. revealed staff completed a weekly skin assessment on April 2, 2023 at 3:50 p.m. and this was the last documented evidence Resident 12's skin integrity had been checked under the immobilizer until the discovery of the wounds on April 6, 2023. The facility failed to assess Resident 12's skin integrity under an immobilizer on the right leg resulting in actual harm to Resident 12 when two unstageable and one stage 3 pressure ulcer were discovered on April 6, 2023. Review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the resident's dominant right side. Review of Resident 16's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated March 17, 2022, which stated: This nurse alerted by therapy of a 1cm x 1cm area to R outer foot. [Suspected Deep Tissue Injury (persistent non-blanchable deep red, purple or maroon area of intact skin, non-intact skin or blood-filled blisters caused by damage to the underlying soft tissues)] is purple in color with red peri-wound. Therapy suspects it is from an ill-fitting brace, and a call was placed by PT to have brace fitted/replaced. Resident [complains of] pain when area is touched. Resident is unsure of how injury was acquired but states it's been hurting for like 4 days. NP and supervisor notified, new order entered to apply skin prep to area until seen and evaluated by podiatry. Review of Resident 16's physician orders, care plan, and Medication/Treatment Administration Records failed to reveal evidence that the resident was ordered a brace, how often the brace should be worn, or that skin checks were being done while the resident was wearing the brace. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023, at approximately 10:40 a.m. confirmed there was no documented evidence related to any orders for Resident 16's right foot brace or skin checks for the brace. Review of Resident 99's clinical record revealed diagnoses including dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability), generalized muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. Further review of Resident 99's clinical record revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer that healed on March 13, 2023. Review of Resident 99's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated December 16, 2022, which stated: Reviewed with IDT [(Interdisciplinary Team)] has a [stage 2 pressure ulcer (superficial with a pale pink wound bed and serous, or clear, drainage and presents itself as an abrasion or blister or shallow crater)] on sacrum. [Resident 99] is incontinent of [bowel and bladder], prefers to lay on her back will order a air mattress. A Skin/Wound note on the same date stated: Wound rounds with IDT ST2 sacrum 5x2x0.1cm. Wound bed pink and with small amt (amount)of yellow material. No drainage noted and no [signs or symptoms] of infection. [Nurse Practitioner] aware of area and husband notified. New order for Xeroform dressing daily. Further review of Resident 99's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated December 29, 2022, which stated: Wound rounds with IDT and [Wound Physician] [unstageable] 2x1x0.1cm. [Deterioration] with peri wound breakdown. Continue with therahoney daily cover with bordered gauze. Further review of the nurse's notes from December 29, 2022, revealed: air mattress requested for worsening wound. Further review of the resident's clinical record failed to reveal a date when the air mattress was provided to Resident 99. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023, at approximately 10:40 a.m. failed to reveal an explanation for the delay in obtaining an air mattress for Resident 99, or what was done in the meantime while awaiting an air mattress for Resident 99. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28. Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records, facility policies, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care for two of 6 residents reviewed (Resident R71 and Resident R88). Findings include: 04/12/23 02:10 PM RD [NAME] confirmed facility did not determine the cause of the residents weight gain and did not put in place new interventions. RD did confirm resident gained 24 lbs in 7 days. Review of Resident R71's clinical medical record revealed the following diagnosis: Muscle Weakness Reduction in the power exerted by muscles resulting in an inability to perform a given task on first attempt), Weakness (lack of energy or strength), Adult failure to thrive (less active than normal, requiring assistance in activities of daily living), Morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (serious health condition that can interfere with basic physical functions such as breathing or walking due to excessive caloric intake). Review of Resident R71's clinical medical record revealed the following weight: 8/21/2022-208.8 Lbs, 8/24/2022-207.9 Lbs, 8/26/2022-207.6 Lbs, 9/4/2022-205.0 Lbs, 10/3/2022-206.3 Lbs, 10/6/2022- 206.0 Lbs, 10/14/2022- 206.6 Lbs, 10/21/2022- 230.6 Lbs, 10/26/2022- 231.5 Lbs, 11/3/2022- 232.6- Lbs. Further review of Resident R71's clinical medical record revealed on October 14, 2022, the resident weighed 206.6 lbs. On October 30, 2022, the resident weighed 230.6 pounds which is a 11.62 % Gain. Review of facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions dated March 2022. The policy states The Physician and the IDT team will identify conditions and medications that may be causing weight changers or increasing the risk of weight changes. Further review of Resident's 71's clinical medical record failed to find any, progress notes, IDT notes, Dietitian notes, Dietary review, or assessments addressing Resident R71's 24-pound weight in 7 days. Interview conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on April 12, 2023, at approximately 2:10 P.M. confirmed Resident R71 gained 24 pounds in 7 days. RD also confirmed the facility failed to identify why Resident R71 gained 24 pounds in 7 days and confirmed that facility did not develop or implement new interventions to reduce ore prevent the resident from gaining further weight. Review of Resident 88's weight revealed a weight on January 18, 2023 of 101.3 and a weight on February 2, 2023 of 122.0 an increase of 20.7 pounds. Review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed a weight note on February 9, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. stating weight change noted, weight reflects 14% increase over 30 days resident noted with edema per skin assessment- may contribute to weight fluctuations will make IDT (interdisciplinary team) aware of weight changes and continue with current POC (plan of care). Further review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed a note dated February 14, 2023 at 9:49 p.m. stating Resident has edema (swelling) to B/L (bilateral- both) legs, right leg more swollen. New order for u/s (ultrasound) of RLE (right lower extremity) to r/o (rule out) DVT (deep vein thrombosis- occurs when a blood clot forms in one or more of the deep veins in the body, usually in the legs.) Further review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed a Nursing note on March 1, 2023 at 4:37 p.m. stating B/l legs have increase edema and weeping (fluid leaking from the legs due to swelling) CRNP made aware. New order for Lasix (anti-diuretic used to decrease amount of fluid in the body) 20mg (milligrams) daily x3 days. Further review of Resident 88's weight revealed a weight on March 7, 2023 of 121.5 and a weight on March 8, 2023 of 127.7 an increase of 6.2 pound in a day. Further review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed a weight note on March 9, 2023 at 8:45 a.m. stating weight change noted. Nursing reports resident is snacking constantly, meal intake 100% and continues with b/l lower edema. Will make IDT aware of weight gain and continue to monitor as needed. Further review of Resident 88's progress notes revealed a note on March 14, 2023 at 2:59 p.m. stating Edema noted to b/l legs. Increased edema to b/l legs. CRNP make aware. New orders, Lasix 20mg PO (orally) daily. The next weight in the resident's record is on March 21, 2023 with a weight of 127.1 Interview with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator on MArch 11, 2023 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed there was a delay in treatment of Resident 88's significant weight gain from January 18, 2023 to February 2, 2023 of 20.7 pounds and a delay for the weight gain of March 7, 2023 to March 8, 2023 of 6.2 pounds. Pa Code 211.12.(a) Nursing services Pa Code 211.6.(b) Dietary services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to prevent accident for two of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 12 and 85) Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to prevent accident for two of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 12 and 85) Findings Include: Review of Resident 12's progress notes revealed a nursing note on February 1, 2023 at 11:34 p.m. stating Resident was found on the floor near the window on a fall mat. The bed bolsters were not attached correctly and were sideways on the bed when the resident was found Review of facility fall investigation report, dated February 1, 2023 revealed the bed bolsters were not attached correctly and were sideways on the bed when the resident was found. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 13, 2023 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed the bed bolsters were not attached to the bed correctly when Resident 12 fell out of bed. Review of Resident 85's diagnosis list revealed Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), and Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body). Review of the nursing progress notes dated August 29, 2022, at 11:03 a.m., revealed that on August 27, 2022, during the 7-3 shift, the resident sustained a skin tear measuring 10.0 x 5.0 cm during care while being transferred from bed to chair, the dressing was applied, physician and family was notified. Review of the facility documentation, and incident report dated August 27, 2022, revealed that at 1:37 p.m. while being transferred from bed to chair, the resident bumped her/his right lower leg onto the side of the wheelchair and sustained a skin tear. The same report indicated that the resident ' s wheelchair was the predisposing situational factor. review of the nursing progress notes dated August 29, 2022, at 9:34 a.m., revealed a right lower extremity skin tear reviewed by the interdisciplinary team, which will assess the wheelchair for sharp edges. The clinical records review failed to reveal that the resident's wheelchair was examined. Review of the nursing progress notes dated September 26, 2022, at 12:29 p.m., revealed nurse was called to the resident's room, and observed a moderate amount of blood coming from the right lower extremity, upon assessment of a new skin tear measuring 3.0 x 4.0 cm was noted below the current area on the right lower extremity. The nurse assistant reported that while helping the resident in the bathroom, the resident bumped her/his leg in the wheelchair while being transferred from the toilet to the wheelchair. Review of the facility's documentation, the incident report dated September 26, 2022, at 12:07 p.m., revealed resident bumped her/his right to the wheelchair while being transferred from the toilet to the wheelchair, and sustained a new skin tear to the right lower leg. The report indicated that the predisposing factor was the wheelchair. Iterview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on April 13, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. The Director of Nursing (DON) reported that after the August 27, 2022, incident, an intervention to check the wheelchair was documented but the DON was unable to say if the intervention was done. The DON confirmed that there was no documentation indicating that the resident ' s wheelchair was checked, and no other interventions were put in place. The facility failed to ensure intervention was implemented to prevent Resident 85 from another accident. 28 Pa. Code §201.18(b)(1)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code §211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the resident's admission weight, notify the physician an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the resident's admission weight, notify the physician and address a significant weight change timely for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated March 2022, revealed the nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken for confirmation. The Dietitian is alerted to weight changes via PCC alerts and is checked a few times a week. Review of Resident 9's weight and vitals revealed an admission weight of 145 pounds on October 26, 2022. The resident was ordered with a weekly weight as per the facility's policy. Review of the weights and vitals dated November 4, 2022, revealed a weight of 112.6 pounds, 32.4 pounds (22.34%), and a significant weight loss from the admission weight. Review of the weights and vitals revealed a re-weight was done on November 8, 2022 (116 pounds), and November 9, 2022 (110 pounds) four days after the identified significant weight change. Review of the nursing progress notes dated November 8, 2022, at 1:15 p.m., revealed the resident triggering for a weight loss, initial weight was from the hospital and will continue to monitor weights weekly to establish a baseline. The clinical records review failed to reveal that the physician was notified of the significant weight change. Review of the nursing progress notes dated November 18, 2022, at 7:56 a.m., revealed Resident eats 50% or less for nine consecutive meals within 3 days, Dietitian was updated. Review of the Dietitian's note dated November 19, 2022, at 3:45 p.m., revealed notified nursing due to variable intakes, and suggest house supplement three times a day until intake improves. Review of the November 2022 Medication Administration Records revealed that the house shakes three times daily were not ordered until November 21, 2022, three days after recommended by the Dietitian. Interview with the Registered Dietitian, Employee E8 was conducted on April 13, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. The Dietitian confirmed that the documented admission weight recorded in the resident's clinical records was a weight from the hospital. The Dietitian reported that the resident's weight should have been taken by the nursing staff upon admission. The Dietitian reported that although the facility's policy does not indicate a specific time for re-weigh if a significant weight change was identified, a re-weight should be done within 24-48 hours. The Dietitian reported being notified of the significant weight change but was unable to tell when. The Dietitian reported addressing the significant weight change by adding a house supplement three times daily. The Dietitian reported that the nursing staff notifies the physician of a significant weight change. Interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on April 13, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. The Dietitian confirmed that the resident's weight should have been taken upon admission and should have not used the hospital's recorded weight. The DON reported that a re-weigh should have been done within 24 hours when a significant weight change was identified. The DON also reported that the nursing (unit manager) was responsible for notifying the physician of a significant weight change. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that a physician was notified of a significant weight change identified on November 4, 2022. The facility failed to ensure Resident 9's baseline weight was taken and failed to address and notify the physician of a significant weight change timely. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records Previously cited 4/29/22 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident Care Policies Previously cited 4/29/22 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services Previously cited 4/29/22
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary psychological services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psych...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary psychological services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being one of two residents reviewed for mood and behaviors (Resident 38). Findings include: Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed a diagnosis of panic disorder (recurrent, unexpected panic attacks). Interview with Resident 38 on April 11, 2023, at 10:10 a.m. revealed that the resident had a history of panic attacks (a sudden episode of intense fear that triggers severe physical reactions when there is no real danger or apparent cause) and was almost hospitalized while at the facility due to having a panic attack that felt like a heart attack. Review of Resident 38's physician's orders revealed an order dated December 21, 2022, for psychologist evaluation and treatment as needed. Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note dated December 21, 2022, which stated: Updated [physician] on [Resident 38's] anxiety new order to increase Buspar [(medication to treat anxiety]) to 20mg [three times daily] and may see Psychologist for talk therapy. Further review of Resident 38's progress notes revealed a nursing note dated January 13, 2023, at 6:44 p.m., which stated: Resident with reports that he is not feeling well and thinks he is having a panic attack .Encouraged fluids and checked back with patient after dinner, at this time he reports he is feeling better [Physician] notified and no changes at this time. At time of last evening med pass resident reports he has chest pressure .When I checked back with him he reports he is feeling much better and believes it is anxiety. Further review of Resident 38's progress notes revealed a nursing note dated January 26, 2023, at 6:17 p.m., which stated: Resident with report of panic attack and reports he has been feeling increasingly anxious the past few days .Nursing supervisor notified and received new orders for Trazadone (antidepressant that can be used to treat anxiety disorders) 25 mg [at bedtime], resident was notified of change. first dose given tonight. Further review of Resident 38's progress notes revealed a nursing note dated February 27, 2023, at 9:20 a.m., which stated: Resident [complained of] not feeling well this morning, states I think I am having a heart attack, there's a freight train in my chest. Upon assessment no abnormalities to note, no objective pain. [vital signs stable.] . Resident requested to go to ER to be evaluated. EMS arrived and resident then declined to go to hospital following EMS assessment. Resident states he is feeling better at this time and said it must have been this anxiety taking over. Reassurance offered. In bed with call bell in reach, resident states he will notify staff if he begins to feel discomfort again. Cares continue. The surveyor requested copies of all of Resident 38's psychology consults since December, 2022. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023, at 10:40 a.m. confirmed that Resident 38 had not had any psychology consults from December 21, 2022 through present. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on the review facility's documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist(s) completed specialized training in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on the review facility's documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist(s) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: During an entrance conference conducted on April 11, 2023, at 9:29 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reported that the facilit's Infection Preventionist (IP)/ Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was a licensed nurse Employee E3. Employee E3 was present during the meeting and confirmed being the IP in the facility and had only been in that position for approximately one month. Facility documentation which includes Infection Preventionist completed specialized infection control training and personnel file was requested. The facility was unable to provide specialized infection control completed by the IP. An interview with the NHA on April 13, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., reported that Employee E3 was newly hired (March 27, 2023). The NHA confirmed that Employee E3 has not completed specialized infection control training before assuming the IP position. The facility failed to ensure that the facility's designated Infection Preventionist(s) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. 28 pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)Management.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Employment Screening (Tag F0606)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on policy and procedure review, employee personnel file reviews and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain criminal background checks and perform reference checks before...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy and procedure review, employee personnel file reviews and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain criminal background checks and perform reference checks before hire of four of five employees reviewed (E3, E10, E11, E13) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure, titled Abuse Protection, dated December 2016, revealed As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will conduct employee background checks. Review of Employee E3 Personnel file revealed the employee was hired on March 27, 2023, but there was no evidence the facility requested a background check from the state of Pennsylvania. Review of Employee E10 Personnel file revealed the employee was hired on January 23, 2023, but there was no evidence the facility requested a background check from the state of Pennsylvania. Review of Employee E11 Personnel file revealed the employee was hired on December 12, 2022, but there was no evidence the facility requested a background check from the state of Pennsylvania. Review of Employee E13 Personnel file revealed the employee was hired on March 13, 2023, but there was no evidence the facility requested a background check from the state of Pennsylvania. Interview with the Human Resource Manager E9 on April 13, 2023 at 11:48 AM confirmed that the facility did not have access to printed background reports for Employees E3, E10, E11, or E13, due their account being locked for non-payment. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (c) Responsibility of licensee Previously cited 4/29/2022 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(e)(1) Management Previously cited 4/29/2023 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (d) Resident care policies Previously cited 4/29/2023
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were available that were ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were available that were ordered for a resident for three of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 38, 90, and 104) and failed to ensure the disposition of medications was reconciled for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: Review of Resident 38's clinical record revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (chronic and progressive movement disorder). Review of Resident 38's physician's orders revealed an order dated December 19, 2022, for Nuplazid (used to treat the symptoms of a certain mental/mood disorders that might occur with Parkinson's disease) 10 milligrams (mg) one time daily. Review of Resident 38's December 2022, January 2023, and February 2023 Electronic Medication Administration Records (eMAR) and eMAR progress notes revealed the medication was routinely not available from the pharmacy. Review of Resident 90's clinical record revealed a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (an anxiety disorder marked by chronic excessive anxiety and worry that is difficult to control). Review of Resident 90's physician's orders revealed an order for alprazolam (Xanax - antianxiety medication) 1 milligram (mg) give one tablet in the afternoon and give one tablet at bedtime. Review of Resident 90's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated September 15, 2022, which stated: Resident out of Xanax Rx. [(prescription)]. Nursing Supervisor aware, Specialty Rx pharmacy aware. The medication isn't in stock. Review of Resident 90's September 2022 Medication Administration Record revealed the resident did not receive Xanax 1mg on September 14, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. or on September 15, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Further review of Resident 90's physician's orders revealed an order for clonazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg three times daily. Review of Resident 90's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated December 4, 2022, which stated: called MD and pharmacy in regards to clonazepam 0.5mg order. Pharmacy still hasn't received the script from [physician.] Review of Resident 90's December 2022 Medication Administration Record revealed the resident did not receive clonazepam 0.5mg on December 4, 2022 at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., or 8:00 p.m., or on December 5, 2022, at 8:00 a.m. or 12:00 p.m. Further review of Resident 90's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated February 7, 2023, which stated: regarding clonazepam [0.5] mg unavailable . RN supervisor made aware . to get an scrip from the Doctor. no behavior observed. Review of Resident 90's February 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed the resident did not receive clonazepam 0.5mg on February 7, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. or on February 8, 2023, at 8:00 a.m. or 12:00 p.m. The facility's failure to have prescribed medications available to Residents 38 and 90 was discussed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023, at 10:40 a.m. Clinical records review revealed Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an Unstageable (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) ulcer to the right heel. A review of the physician's order dated March 3, 2023, revealed an order to apply Santyl (A medication that removes dead tissue from wounds so they can start to heal) to right heal after cleansing with normal saline, covered with dressing every night shift. A review of the April 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed that the ordered Santyl treatment to the right heel was not done on April 2, 3, and 4, 2023. A review of the nursing progress notes dated March 26, 2023, at 5:20 a.m., revealed pharmacy was notified about sending Santyl ointment. A review of the nursing progress notes dated April 3, 2023, at 6:17 a.m., revealed unable to find the Santyl and placed moist 4 x 4 gauze on the resident's foot. A review of the nursing progress notes dated April 4, 2023, at 4:39 a.m., revealed Santyl was not in the facility, and did normal saline and dressing treatment to the right heel. A review of the nursing progress notes dated April 5, 2023, at 2:32 a.m., revealed awaiting Santyl from the pharmacy, normal saline wet to dry dressing was applied until then. Clinical records review failed to reveal that the physician was notified of the missed Santyl treatment to the resident's right heel on April 2,3, and 4, 2023. A review of the pharmacy packing slip and delivery revealed that the Santyl ointment was delivered on April 5, 2023, at 4:21 a.m. An interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on April 13, 2023. The DON confirmed that Santyl's treatment to the resident's right heel wound was not done due to the unavailability of the medication. The DON also confirmed that the physician was not notified of the missed Santyl treatment. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing Services
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of clinical records, Facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an accurate monthly medication regimen review and appropriate physici...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of clinical records, Facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an accurate monthly medication regimen review and appropriate physician recommendation response for five of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Resident 28, Resident 30, Resident 38, Resident 69, and Resident 90). Findings include: Review of Resident 28's clinical medical record revealed the following Pharmacy reviews where the Pharmacist made recommendations that required Resident R21's physician to respond: March 24, 2023, March 9, 2023, February 9, 2023, January 6, 2023, November 7, 2022, October 6, 2022, July 14, 2022, and June 9, 2022. The Pharmacy reviews listed above were requested for review on April 12, 2023, during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). On April 13, 2023, at approximately 1:30 P.M. The facility had only provided Pharmacy reviews for the following dates: June 9, 2022, October 6, 2022, January 6, 2023, and February 9, 2023. The facility failed to provide Pharmacy reviews from: July 2022, November 2022, December 2022, and March 2023. Upon review, it was revealed the pharmacy review from October 6, 2022, was not addressed until December 9, 2022, and the Pharmacy review from February 9, 2023, was not addressed until April 12, 2023. At the conclusion of the Full Health Survey on April 13, 2023, the facility only provided 4 out of the 8 pharmacy reviews requested and 2 of the provided Pharmacy reviews were addressed by the physician outside of the 30-day window. Review of Resident 30 ' s progress notes written by the consultant pharmacist revealed recommendations were made to changes of the medication regimen on May 10, 2022, August 9, 2022, August 16, 2022, December 8, 2022 and February 10, 2023. Review of the Note to attending Physician/prescriber revealed there was no response to the recommendations of May 10, 2022, August 9, 2022, August 16, 2022, and December 8, 2022 from the physician and the response to the recommendation of February 10, 2023 recommendation were not completed until April 12, 2023. Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. revealed there was no documentation showing that the physician responded to the pharmacy recommendation of May 10, 2022, August 9, 2022, August 16, 2022, and December 8, 2022 and that there was a delay in the response to the pharmacy recommendation of April 12, 2023. Review of Resident 38's progress notes written by the consultant pharmacist revealed recommendations were made on January 6, 2023, and March 8, 2023. Review of Resident 38's Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber revealed the March 8, 2023 pharmacy recommendation was not addressed by the physician until April 12, 2023. The surveyor asked for a copy of the January 6, 2023 recommendation, and at the conclusion of the survey was not provided with the recommendation or physician response. Review of Resident 69's Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber revealed the December 7, 2022, pharmacy recommendation was not addressed by the physician. The surveyor asked for a copy of the December 7, 2022, recommendation, and at the conclusion of the survey was not provided with the recommendation or physician response Review of Resident 90's progress notes written by the consultant pharmacist revealed recommendations were made on October 6, 2022, December 7, 2022, and March 8, 2023. Review of Resident 90's Notes to Attending Physician/Prescriber revealed the March 8, 2023 was not addressed until April 12, 2023. Further review revealed the October 6, 2022 and December 7, 2022 recommendations were not addressed by the physician. The above findings were confirmed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on April 13, 2023, at approximately 10:40 a.m. Pa Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services Pa Code 211.5.(f) Clinical records
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • 22 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $44,985 in fines. Higher than 94% of Pennsylvania facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 60/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing Staffed?

CMS rates MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing?

State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 20 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing?

MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MORDECHAI WEISZ, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 133 certified beds and approximately 123 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in POTTSTOWN, Pennsylvania.

How Does Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing Stick Around?

Staff turnover at MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing Ever Fined?

MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING has been fined $44,985 across 2 penalty actions. The Pennsylvania average is $33,529. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Manatawny Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing on Any Federal Watch List?

MANATAWNY CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.